Added: 4 years ago
From: elcrowing
Views: 964
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (33)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • HOMOSEXUAL SEX, ie sodomy, is the BEST WAY TO TRANSMIT SEXUALLY TRANSMITTED DISEASE, minus exclusively vaginal diseases, though i would imagine you gays certainly harbour those. ANAL SEX IS HOMOSEXUALITY!!!!!!!!!!

  • How doesn't it work?

    And how the fuck am I a sexist? Really. Explain this to me, please.

  • @elcrowing

    homosexuality doesnt work because - gays do not procreate. the purpose for penetrative sex is to produce children, it is also pleasurable, however there is no physical, moral, or worldy benefit or gain to 'pleasure' souly.

    you are a sexist, because you believe you can do what only a woman can do, and disregard hetrosexuals for dismissing homosexual activity as is prerequisit to loving, non-sodomisitic hetrosexual love making.

  • You are misreading, the article is saying, that being a homosexual, you are more likely to be immuno-supressed, and you are more likely to have sex with people whos cleanliness you are not aware of. because of these reasons YES gay men have more illnesses and diseases. they are not part of the general public because YOU YOURSELVES HAVE SEPERATED FROM US, CLAIMING SAME-SEX IS PURPOSEFUL.

  • YEH THANKS TO DIRTY HIV RIDDLED GAYS.

  • just like many sexually transmitted diseases, because homosexuality is wrong. its like drug abuse, pleasure for no actual gain.

  • There's nothing to be gained from being in love and engaging in sexual activity with the person you love?

    Of course, because you're not having children, you're obviously just an evil faggot out to destroy white, straight America!

  • @elcrowing

    had nothing to do with white.

    do you fuck ur mum and dad because you love them?

  • @daenumen Oh, that delightfully tired argument? It's been awhile since I've heard that one. Good show.

    I shouldn't have to explain to you that that is a different kind of love, and could apply in the case of straight relationships just as much as it could with gay ones, but whatever.

  • @elcrowing

    one you still refuse to accept. ur rectum was designed to contain feces, not to contain penis. the vagina was designed for that, ie thicker walls. also its purpose is for procreation.

    you can love someone without engaging in sexual activity. infact love and sexual activity have little in relation, other than people may choose to have sex when in love. sex does not have to be penetrative, and considering the damage anal does, its certainly not loving, just lustful.

  • @daenumen

    Love and lust can most certainly go hand in hand.

    And LOL. You're calling me a sexist? REALLY? That's adorable, kid.

    I'm not gay, by the way. I'm bisexual. Of course to people like you that either doesn't exist or there's no difference. So whatever.

    I don't believe I'm better or worse than anyone else on the merits of being a crossdresser. Who the fuck cares?

    And no, the human race WOULDN'T be sustainable if only gay people exist...but who thinks that anyway?

  • @daenumen

    or do you get fucked by men because ur perverted, and believe you have the beauty of a woman? or even worse are so sexist against women that you believe your impersonation of their being is better than they are? would the human race be sustainable if there were only gays in a natural way? are you sure you are batting for the right team?

  • Feel free to put that last comment up if you want. I may not like you but regardless, removing that last one was an attempt to reply.

    But the stupid faggot can't operate a computer, apparently.

  • @elcrowing

    and now you hate me for caring for the survival of my species, and wanting to help take from you the sadness caused by your perversion, ie bullying, being outcast, physical damage ie prolapse, and higher chances to catch stds, and for what, to be a rebel?

    i wish a gay/bi-sexual person would be able to explain why/what makes/made them gay, without sticking there nose up at me like im just another common, ignorant to the world's workings, hetrosexual.

  • Yes, I am so full of hatred for you. I pity you.

    And the birth rate at this point is staggering. You have NOTHING to worry about regarding the fate of our species. As of right now we're doing just fine.

    As for my bisexuality, I am capable of sexual attraction to both women and men. I'm not sure why that's such a hard concept to grasp.

    I am also happily taken by a woman, so even by your standards I'm not some "rebel".

    And not every gay person is sad. A good portion aren't. Just...wow.

  • @elcrowing

    ? i dont need your pity? or your sarcasm.

    actually the birthrate amongst 'white' people has fallen below the sustainable rate, so yeh, gays arent whites.

    i realise the semantics, ive asked why do you and how did you 'realise' you were that way?

    you are rebellious to the social norm of men dressing as men.

    tell me of one gay person that didnt loose when turning gay? friends, family, continence, prospect of children without the aid of a machine, being 'different', ?

  • I don't consider myself a rebel by any stretch of the imagination. I dress in clothes that make me feel comfortable. Mens' clothing doesn't do that for me. If that's rebelling, whatever. I'm not fussed about social norms.

    People don't "turn gay". And yes, unfortunately people do face persecution for coming out, but in the end losing people that won't respect you for who you are is better than living a lie.

    Of course I don't expect you to understand that, feeling it's a choice.

  • @elcrowing

    i cannot understand how dressing 'like' a woman makes you feel comfortable, you face persecution doing so, by everyone except those that are ignorant to nature, ie men and women are different.

    people do 'turn gay', ie 'coming out of the closet'. at some point during puberty sexual expression emerges, hence you turn gay. biologically you should be straight.

    how did you realise you were gay, and not straight? you still havent answered the question, like all gays do, you avoid.

  • I realized I was bisexual when, coming to the age of puberty, I realized I was attracted to men as well as women. What's so complicated about that? I must be missing something here. There's really nothing beyond that.

    And I couldn't care less about persecution. I'd rather dress how I do and feel comfortable than dress like a manly manly man and feel like shit about myself.

  • @elcrowing

    must suck to have bad taste. women are far more attractive.

    are you a smoker, if so, how many and what brand?

    you dont have to dress like a 'manly man', mens clothes are more about being comfortable or smart, minus all the new gay fashion rubbish.

    what attracts you to men, and what attracts you to women.

    i find women attractive because they have characteristics i like, they are gentle and soft spoken in comparison to myself, and they feel nice to hold.

  • @elcrowing

    you gain nothing but the pleasure of having it, like drugs, and give up the sanctity and functionality of your rectum and anal sphincter in the process.

  • Note that The Annals of International Medicine found ONE study that "concluded that men living in predominately gay ZIP codes in San Francisco are 13 times more likely to be infected by ONE STRAIN of MRSA than their heterosexual neighbours."

    This article implies that the entire MRSA virus is due to gay sex.

    This douche researcher from the University of California, San Francisco said "We think that it's spread through sexual activity,"

    We THINK? Ugh.

  • I found that on Wikipedia, as I was writing a letter to David Wilkins, the Public Relations dude from Reuters.

    Even though a piece of this is true, this truth has been skewed in a really offencive way.

  • MRSA is also becoming a problem in pediatric settings,[52] including hospital nurseries.[53] A 2007 study found that 4.6% of patients in U.S. health care facilities were infected or colonized with MRSA.[54] One 2008 study concluded that men living in predominately gay ZIP codes in San Francisco are 13 times more likely to be infected by one strain of MRSA than their heterosexual neighbors.

  • MRSA's bacteria can live on surfaces and infect others for weeks later. It's been targeting studants and athlets just for having body contact. It's a cross contamination with 85% of cases were people getting infeted in hospitals.

    Watch out, wash your hands, take showers, clean and desinfect sharing surfaces, personal itens, etc..

    There is not such a thing called "gay deseases". The worst "desease" of our society is called prejudgment.

    Anyone can contract MRSA.

  • MRSA's bacteria can live on surfaces and infect others for weeks later. It's been targeting studants and athlets just for having body contact. It's a cross contamination with 85% of cases were people getting infeted in hospitals.

    Watch out, wash your hands, take showers, clean and desinfect sharing surfaces, personal itens, etc..

    There is not such a thing called "gay deseases". The worst "desease" of our society is called prejudgment.

    Anyone can contract MRSA.

  • i thought you were a girl!!

    :O

  • Gee, what the fuck is wrong with people ? Do they remember that homosexuals are human beings and have the same physical features than heterosexual people.

    It' s clearly not a problem of a man having sex with another man. The problem is always the same : use condoms and do tests to know if you or your partner have some diseases.

    I am straight and even I am pissed off by this. And like you said, Tony, it' s really sad that an usually reliable source such as Reuter would publish such garbage.

  • Gee, what the fuck is wrong with people ? Do they remember that homosexuals are human beings and have the same physical features than heterosexual people.

    It' s clearly not a problem of a man having sex with another man. The problem is always the same : use condoms and do tests to know if you or your partner have some diseases.

    I am straight and even I am pissed off by this. And like you said, Tony, it' s really sad that an usually reliable source such as Reuter would publish such garbage.

  • it is retarded! I agree with You Tony..they just targeted homosexuality as everyone else does...it is bullcrap!

  • We had an outbreak of MRSA. Passed around in schools and hospitals and such...

    It's really sucky that the quote made it in that article, probably just as much as sucky as the article being printed online.

  • Wow, sugar. That's so retarded. How can they say that? It's a really bad freaking staph infection. Anyone can get them. Grrrr. That just pisses me off. I <3 ya Tony!

    -Courtney

Loading...
Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more