I fear it will never be available. They just redesigned the wing because it was plunder. Then they redesign the price, then nobody likes the heavy carbon shi(t)p anymore.
id buy one me if I won the lottery, definitely, its not stupidly expensive 80 grand, I wouldn't pay 80 grand on a car though even if I could afford it, to watch 40 grand drop out of its ass in no time.
this video is basically an ad. i have no problem with that, i chose to watch it. but having to watch some other ad in order to see this one just sucks donkey balls, all day long
this video is basically an ad. i have no problem with that, i chose to watch it. but having to watch some other ad in order to see this one just sucks donkey balls, all day long
I love hitting the F5 till there is no advertising for annoying me. Even if it takes about one minute, I won't let youtube get the gratification of molesting me with dull and uninsipred commercial. Human win!
The price makes the plane unavailable to over 85% of the population of the US, GB, Canada or Australia. Of the 15% left only a small percentage would purchase. It's a great plane but it can only exist in the dreams of most people. Make one that is available to those that have to drive a $10,000 car. Seems no one wants poor customers. We are the ones that can only look at the pictures.
@MyBowelsAreLoose The last thing anyone needs, is poorly made airplanes with cheap parts flying the skies. This is rather inexpensive in the world of aviation. It COSTS money to make these aircraft safe and reliable. Before you start trolling, do some research.
wow i luv the head lights one the non flying one. and the fact any one can fly it like a car. Yikes. probably need to loose that part of the marketing and maybe the headlights. maybe the car look makes it easy to fly.
I am going to wait until they get a model that has VTOL, as well as submarine capabilities. I don't know why this is not already available, I mean its 2010! It would compliment my underwater lair well I think. That and sharks with laser beams attached to their heads of course.
it sounds really cool, but as a sport reacreational aircraft (sra) it is useless if it is incapable of vertical take-off and landing. An amphibius sra with hovering and vertical capabilities will not be a bad idea in short, a hybridised amphibius recreational sports helioplane (HARSH)
Depends where you live 232lalas. Vertical take-off is not necessary at all if your live on the coast or a place with many lakes. In Canada, lakes have been used as "runways" for many years with the "Beaver" plane equipped with pontoons. There are lakes within every 5 miles spreading across the country including networks of refueling docks and shops. The Icon's range is 300 miles. I am sure if you were efficient at flight planning you could make this plane work anywhere.
Runs on Unleaded, that's cool.
ScientificExploits 21 hours ago
Who's your daddy?
MrSchpankme 1 week ago
I fear it will never be available. They just redesigned the wing because it was plunder. Then they redesign the price, then nobody likes the heavy carbon shi(t)p anymore.
tinolino58 4 weeks ago
Let me have one!
Let me have one!
kongcodejsf 1 month ago
i want one with a bunk bed ... and a propane stove ... and a toilet and shower.
Austyg 1 month ago
perfect
Phughy 1 month ago
get the one with the parachute opition, you still need a couple hundred feet so you do not DIE!
sqeakgeek 3 months ago
Dear Santa...
TheNinjaModz 3 months ago 3
range?
loveEncsi 4 months ago
@loveEncsi someone didn't pay attention to the vid
PwnforceFrank 3 months ago
@PwnforceFrank i did. was just a little fast with my question
loveEncsi 3 months ago
@loveEncsi 300miles, watch the video :)
Phughy 1 month ago
@Phughy wrote it in the middle of the video. was to eager
loveEncsi 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
vote this up if you found out this was a real plane from parkzone.
TRAPBOULTERNAS 4 months ago
Comment removed
whitecarish 4 months ago
[jxe nfrjq ct,t!
Ottonturk 5 months ago
wil it crash very hard???
azezrtyuuiopqsdfghjk 5 months ago
only 89k pounds..... I WANT ONE O.O
TheJeffersonpimp 5 months ago
Never gotten a thumbs up before. I'd like to atleast double those numbers
Carz1100 5 months ago
but the question is, will it blend?
Mariochaz 5 months ago 15
@Mariochaz you are not exactly mr current events are you... you might as be here dropping references to somthing from the 60s
jackoadeetayo1 3 months ago
@Mariochaz Yes. Tom Dickson will blend anything that gets in his way :-P
bloodred32567 1 month ago
dude . . . . I like cheese
TheTristan70 5 months ago
Boobies
a3itor 5 months ago 3
bad thing i believe is that since his engine doesnt have too much power it needs bigger wings, if the wings were smaller it would be more awesome
henrique6996 6 months ago
£89,000!!!!!!!!!!!!! does it come with rocket launchers? because it looks like it should.
GAFAAAAAA 6 months ago
id buy one me if I won the lottery, definitely, its not stupidly expensive 80 grand, I wouldn't pay 80 grand on a car though even if I could afford it, to watch 40 grand drop out of its ass in no time.
Sudstah 6 months ago
ROTAX BITCHES!!!!
jtangjerd 6 months ago
Check out the "Akoya" airplane: lands on ground, water & snow, better performances, got cabin parachute, etc etc...
MrC5N 7 months ago
Now slap on a jet engine on this like an eclipse 400. Oh mama!!! I'll wear a fighter pilot helmet before I get into it.
shaheertanveerakhan 7 months ago
dear santa....
lrgoose 7 months ago
this video is basically an ad. i have no problem with that, i chose to watch it. but having to watch some other ad in order to see this one just sucks donkey balls, all day long
cheezyridr 7 months ago 3
this video is basically an ad. i have no problem with that, i chose to watch it. but having to watch some other ad in order to see this one just sucks donkey balls, all day long
cheezyridr 7 months ago
Sick plane, I want one!
hellfire0990 7 months ago
150mil dolares
nopi316 7 months ago
@nopi316 seriosly?
AJsfree2toke 7 months ago
@AJsfree2toke seriously if that's what it's worth a friend
nopi316 7 months ago
oh so love it, i wish i could have it.
amdddr 7 months ago
"Look it actually works" no shit Sherlock!
mobspeak 7 months ago
its just 89 thousand pounds ... wow man that's very cheap ..... i want two ... a black one and a white one ...........
mraheels 8 months ago 17
@mraheels It's cheap for an aircraft..
Speedcorp 1 month ago
Looks like an RC plane :P
FMXPRO199 9 months ago
I love hitting the F5 till there is no advertising for annoying me. Even if it takes about one minute, I won't let youtube get the gratification of molesting me with dull and uninsipred commercial. Human win!
Oldenways 9 months ago
the price is less than half of a house in southern california. I could get a second ......
lanceehansen 9 months ago
"You don't hafta be mega rich..." so normal rich works?
bassicj 9 months ago
The price makes the plane unavailable to over 85% of the population of the US, GB, Canada or Australia. Of the 15% left only a small percentage would purchase. It's a great plane but it can only exist in the dreams of most people. Make one that is available to those that have to drive a $10,000 car. Seems no one wants poor customers. We are the ones that can only look at the pictures.
MyBowelsAreLoose 9 months ago 2
@MyBowelsAreLoose The last thing anyone needs, is poorly made airplanes with cheap parts flying the skies. This is rather inexpensive in the world of aviation. It COSTS money to make these aircraft safe and reliable. Before you start trolling, do some research.
alitmz 9 months ago
I LIKE POOP
oliver18754 9 months ago 3
Dear Santa...
ThinkBiker 9 months ago 3
Anybody else noticed that the computer animation olooked a lot better then the real footage of the plane?
myslmysl 10 months ago 3
Comment removed
100CommonCents 10 months ago
how much??????????
TheDragonSlayer03 11 months ago
i like you
kevinkillsit 11 months ago
@kevinkillsit you like me?
taseer3142 11 months ago
28 Seconds of advertisement to watch a 60 second video. 60 Seconds of pure AWESOMENESS!
175myles 11 months ago
how many people can ride that??...
PrinceSean46 11 months ago
@PrinceSean46 2 people can ride.
taseer3142 11 months ago
WTF
I could put it in the trunk of my car..!
evilguigui21 1 year ago
i like the interior
khaled6100 1 year ago
@khaled6100 yeah man me too.
taseer3142 11 months ago
139,000??!?!?! i could buy a house with that eff that i need to prioritize
antwaa2n000 1 year ago
@antwaa2n000 Im thinking somthing like this could be an entertainment attraction at a state park or lake resort
rcacad 11 months ago
that is very cool and affordable.
MrROTD 1 year ago
umm. wht is that in u.s. dollars?
nazizombiekiller367 1 year ago
@nazizombiekiller367 $139,900.
FantasticBob7000 1 year ago
wow i luv the head lights one the non flying one. and the fact any one can fly it like a car. Yikes. probably need to loose that part of the marketing and maybe the headlights. maybe the car look makes it easy to fly.
kirbybitten 1 year ago
wow i luv the head lights one the non flying one. and the fact ANY ONE CAN fly it like a car. Yikes.
kirbybitten 1 year ago
Im gonna buy 1 you watch me
Cichlid180 1 year ago
COOLEST THING EVAH!
And the designers just nailed it with the price, still expensive but not unreachable. :D
rock3tcat 1 year ago
yo quiero uno
pablomlg1977 1 year ago
anyone got 89 grand to lend me?
comptonassjt 1 year ago
I want one....and it better come with a year supply of condoms.
TubeTripping 1 year ago
good price, good speed, good range, nice interior, quiet, transportable.. can you fault it?
ItsMRMONEY 1 year ago
@ItsMRMONEY no
taseer3142 11 months ago
how much mony
ipwnthenoob1 1 year ago
Hell ya! Now we just need some genius like Ford to believe everyone should have one in their driveway!
briansmobile1 1 year ago
Soon cars will fly :P
sandor139 1 year ago
@sandor139 i dont think so.
taseer3142 11 months ago
@taseer3142 :)
sandor139 11 months ago
so f@cking cool !!!
vj198 1 year ago
biggest problem is that you can not have retractable landing gear and auto retractable wings... weight doesnt permit!!
mttbritten 2 years ago
i like pinneaple
TheMarisolS 2 years ago 52
@TheMarisolS i like ponnies.. wanna be my friend? :D
m1ck3n 1 year ago
@TheMarisolS and i like mango.
taseer3142 11 months ago
@TheMarisolS
I don't get it?
92benno92 9 months ago
@TheMarisolS i only like them after being in salt water
touchsmart0 8 months ago
very sexy, but 75k too much
repubslikeback 2 years ago
98k
siebelebieb 2 years ago
@repubslikeback well you don't need to be MEGA rich, you just need to be rich instead :O what a relief!
Arvak777 1 year ago
@repubslikeback
repubslikeback 1 year ago
do you need a sports lince to fly it?
otterpat 2 years ago
I am going to wait until they get a model that has VTOL, as well as submarine capabilities. I don't know why this is not already available, I mean its 2010! It would compliment my underwater lair well I think. That and sharks with laser beams attached to their heads of course.
sean2me 2 years ago
nice
mato4445 2 years ago
Wow, Its like the corvette of sports planes. Sweet!
ModKillr 2 years ago
it sounds really cool, but as a sport reacreational aircraft (sra) it is useless if it is incapable of vertical take-off and landing. An amphibius sra with hovering and vertical capabilities will not be a bad idea in short, a hybridised amphibius recreational sports helioplane (HARSH)
232lalas 2 years ago
How many SRA's have VTOL ability and are not helicoptors.
trulynot 2 years ago
Depends where you live 232lalas. Vertical take-off is not necessary at all if your live on the coast or a place with many lakes. In Canada, lakes have been used as "runways" for many years with the "Beaver" plane equipped with pontoons. There are lakes within every 5 miles spreading across the country including networks of refueling docks and shops. The Icon's range is 300 miles. I am sure if you were efficient at flight planning you could make this plane work anywhere.
rckn4ever 2 years ago
красавец
authorigor 2 years ago
pretty sure that is one of the coolest things i have ever seen
wafflecone38 3 years ago 62
@wafflecone38 pretty sure I agree with you!
alitmz 9 months ago