Added: 3 years ago
From: RandyMedion
Views: 67,286
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (126)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • That's awesome that them boys across seas get down on American muscle like we do. Hell some of the sickest muscle cars I've seen have been from Europe.

  • Dudes hair is perfect for that car!

  • For all ya tards here that think Honda is so great, did you see my video response to this? The T/A At the track was walking Z06's, Porsche GT2 and GT3's and even an unsuspecting Lotus Elise! All the cars in the track were highly modified which made it fair game for the SD-455 Lurking behind them! So now you see..even with the Porsche's HUGE TURBOS and the Z06's Mighty LS-6 or 7 The Tin Indian's BIG BORE MOnster which is running 690 HP still blew the bejeesus out of the competition and the world!

  • Is the mullet ok or did it catch some fire?

  • @camaro75v8 Yeah the car can be replaced as long as the mullet isnt harmed...

  • DO IT FOR JOHNNY!

  • i love trans am, i have on myself, but i just dont like 79-81

  • Holy rare export lights!

  • I to have a 79 TA blue with white leather power everything and ac. I wouldnt trade it for ANY imported car. America FTW

  • Do you have any quarter mile ets from either the hemi or bird!!! Is the hemi a half ton?? shortwide bed? single cab? Thumbs up!! Looks like carb smoke from the pontiac, thumbs up!!!

  • @curtknows101 I think they do between 15.0 and 15.7 but I'm not sure, 0-60 in 7.9 sec

  • @RandyMedion Thanks man, that sounds about right and just needed input to back up my theory haha, thankyou curtknows101

  • @RandyMedion daaaamn thats slow...

  • That's not a mullet, dumb asses.

  • Pontiac is sweet. Old cars FTW

  • If you didn't give him a head start you would of beat it

  • Dude that Pontiac is awesome! I couldn't tell if that was the Ram honking that aftermarket horn or the Trans Am. If it was the T/A, put the originals back in...they sound so much better and probably commanded more respect lol.

  • hemi=awesome (algebra for that ass) lol who needs x

    but 6.6l v8...in a car....a freanin trans am lol i wouldnt take those odds if im a betting man, and i drive 5.7 hemi :)

    sweet tho. id drive either! (american muscle...nothing better)

  • that shit is sick as hell man

  • Sweet car! I didn't realize they have a 6.6 in em...bad ass!!

  • Bad ass trans am every one who shit talked about this car are just hating ignore them and they'll get the hint no one cares what they have to say congratulations on owning such a classic!!!

  • Mullets the other sign of a shallow jean pool! Do you have to have a mullet when you buy a 70's camaro? Is that a members only jacket? I bet cletus still plays pong! OMFG awesome!

  • lol its john travolta racing in the boonies

  • i beat the same trans am in my 05 cadillac dts (300hp northstar) and i had a passenger too! he wouldnt run again! he was scared of the caddy!

  • @mrdjeuro

    Dude,

    your such a troll. Lemme guess. your driving a p.o.s. 92 civic, right. Your not getting looks either way So your just pissed off you can't afford a legendary classic like this. So why don't you hope off here and go make someretarded noise with your fart can p.o.s.

  • @mrdjeuro

    Actually, your wrong on this one. I daily drive an 81 Trans Am. It's the same as a 79( thought I should tell you since you don't know) Every chick I'm around or meet love the trans am and they are absolutely not dikes. But when it comes to a acura, they don't give them imports a second look. While your looking at my tail lights my girl will say what a loser. My pontiac will shit on what ever it is you drive, if you your even old enough to drive.

  • @transamfan81 lmfao yeah i bet girls love starring at a piece of old shit from a company that went bankrupt.. if people loved those cars, they would still buy them.. too bad pontiacs a piece of shit.. well i guess in a hick country thats all you can get

  • i whooped the shit out of a v8 manual trans am with my 01 acura cl... trans am is shit

  • @mrdjeuro yea but when you tell a girl you drive a acura, she could care less, when you tell a girl you drive a trans am, it has history and class, so what if your faster, my dad can beat up your dad!!

  • @davidlundy41 sorry to tell you, 99% of girls dont like muscle cars... most like classy, expensive, and nice looking cars.. and if the girls youre with like muscle cars, sorry, theyre dikes.. HENCE tell a girl you drive an acura (expensive, classy, new car) she will DEFINETLY be more impressed than saying (i drive a 1979 pontiac)... most girls dont know shit about cars and the older the year and the shittier the name, they will laugh.. SORRY REDNECK!

  • @mrdjeuro actually not a redneck, just born in the wrong era. it just shows your level of intelligence when you infer im a redneck because i prefer muscle to import. 

  • @mrdjeuro Wow. Do you go to the tanning salon and also get pedicures for these high maintinance,material girls that aparently like you just for your glorified honda?

  • @REVMSTR69 no i just dont go for dikes like you

  • @mrdjeuro dude, how stupid are you? i've had many many cars as classics and more recent cars, to be honest they like older cars better for what reason? you can take care of something for a lot longer than you have to keep paying for it,instead of going to out to buy a new one when it breaks down, you actually fix the vehicle as in your relantionship would be - something goes wrong, you fix it NOT something goes wrong - get a new one

  • @Fckinwhitepplz lmfao if you women are over 50, maybe they like old pieces of shit then ok.. my age around 20, sorry most of them dont care what class or engine it has, they like what's expensive and looks good.. beamers, benz, and betleys. not pontiacs, fords, and chevys.. all american hick cars

  • @mrdjeuro my woman ain't 50, besides thats a beautiful age to be, to be honest your lookin at gold diggers, the woman i look at are love machines

  • looks like his haircut is from 1979 too...

  • did the engine blow in the car??? what's up with the smoke coming from it a lil bit into the race?

  • @Sasuke1891Sakura sand on the road

  • was that the guy from grease?

  • wouldnt touch that transam with a 20 foot pole

  • His ta is slow I love ta but his is just slow but his paint is nice

  • dude i love that paintjob, freekin sweet

  • shit thats like watching paint dry

  • firebird + mullet = awesomeness

  • thats a nice trans am i cant wait until i get one trans ams nice muscle cars.

  • The aerodynamics of that mullet was why he won!

  • the horn sounded girly

  • Yeah it's not a real trans am, just a 79 firebird. Still badass though, must have done a good bit of motor work.

  • Good to know you can beat a RAM in that bitch. Got a buddy with one, won't he be surprised his stupid little hemi got walked all over by a 30 year old car! I'm digging the color by the way.

  • Nothing like a redneck with a mullet !!!! I bet he lives in a double wide

  • @RandyMedion he might be talking about joe dirt

  • hey are those new hemis quad overhead cam?

  • no way, screw quad cams. long live pushrods! the new hemi is similar configuration to original hemi, just smaller and much improved.

  • This one. The one I commented on.

  • Damn! he got the car, the mullet, if only he had a blond named Debbie, he'd be the complete package lol

  • @mikegotta400ex no shit, I pulled in the cruise-in behind my pal steve. he in his 79 TA and me and my 71 Formula, either way as he passed some people I aproached them and could hear them laughing their butt off saying "oh my god, he's even got the mullet"..... and he you know he did and I had never even put it together before. How is this so obvious to other people? ha ha ha

  • trans am isn't a make dumbass it's a model

  • who said t/a was a make dumb fuck!

  • dodge hemi what a joke t/a is alot better than and dodge

  • well tat depends on what your doing, racing a pickup truck against a sports car your not going to win but maybe through some mud or up a steep hill in the winter or even a tug o war the truck has got it.

  • @boobsmaster well those t/a's are junk

  • well i agree they have some issues and the doors are prone to hinge failure but i would drive one

  • hey was patrick swayze driving the trans am?lol

  • i have a 79 trans am with 403 OLDS it has a 650 holley carb and i can get it from 0-60mph in 5.1 secs i ran it against a mustang in london

  • 70's mullet man ftw lol

  • who ever commented that 455 will walk 454 s knows nothing ! and a 6.6 isnt a 400 !

  • a 6.6 litre pontiac is definatly a 400 lol ive owned one since i was 14 and im actualy stroking it to 461 cubic inches. i also have a 6.5 litre chevy diesel that comes in at 396 ci. theres a formula to figure it out but im not sure what it is

  • liter x 61.5

  • there are like 16.5 cc in one cubic inch and1000 cc in one liter. eg, 16.5x396=6534 roundit to the nearest hundred and you have a 6.5 liter

  • @boobsmaster to figure out cubic inches to liters... cubic inches multiplied by 2.54 three times and divide by 1000. i.e. 396x2.54x2.54x2.54=6489.277344­. round down if it is not .5 or higher. gives you 6489. divide by 1000 and you get 6.489 round up from hundredths. you get 6.5L. you got the number right but formula wrong. just for the heck of it, try mustang 5.0L. ford lied! 302ci x 2.54 x 2.54 x 2.54 =4948.89. divide by 1000 and round. 4.949. not quite 5.0.... should have been called a 4.9L

  • im sure your right i was just quoting google and they say... 1 cubic inches = 16.387064 cubic centimeters. so i usualy just use this and multiply 16.387064 by the number of cubic inches and round. also ford already called the 300 six a 4.9 liter but im not sure what engine was made first.

  • @boobsmaster yeah but it was a 4.9L I6. so they would have a 4.9L I6 and a 4.9L V8. i know what you are saying tho. i just kinda wonder how many engines have the wrong conversion to liters....so far every one i have figured out is right. and actually my friend used to have a 302 in his lincoln. i think it was a mark VI? it was an 89 anyways. but his engine was listed in his owners manual as a 4.9L V8. he showed it to me after i kept telling him a 302 was a 5.0L.

  • @boobsmaster you must have messed up your math somewhere. that google number is right. oh you rounded the 16.387064 to 16.5...thats what heppened. you cant round before-hand. makes a big difference when multiplying.

  • @solberg205 A 6.6 litre motor is a 400 or a Olds 403.

  • or a duramax 402

  • forget the 454 lets play with a 572 now that is lovely

  • you can put a 454 in any car all depends on your creativity you could put it in a mini coopper like i say its the creativity on your setup it has been done

  • Has that thing got a " Mullet " ......LOL

  • @TheLizardKing1967

    lol, i was thinking the same thing!! he fits the car perfect!!!

  • I never said I agreed with it, I was just commenting on how everyone else was confused by the car having a 454. Of course it would have been a 403, or maybe a 400 if it came with a stick. I just wanted people to know that it's not some impossible task to swap motors, and if the guy says it has a 454, then he's not lying, or incorrect, he just did a motor swap at some time.

  • You people realize how easy it is to put a 454 in one of these right? As if any of those cars are numbers matching nowadays.

  • Who the hell would want a 454 in place of a 400 Pontiac? Not me. If we're talking engine swaps, a 455 is a direct bolt in and will walk 454 Camaros all day long. BUT if it's a '79 it should be a 403 Olds motor which was a turd anyways

  • yea some lucky t/a owners snatched up ones with 400's early in the year after they announced they were discontinuing them that year so the rest of that year they slapped in the pontiac turbo 301's which were dogs and also the olds which were junk too, but im thinking they were olds 350's? i could be wrong but i think they were

  • Na, olds 403s. DOGS and you're right, EARLY 79s were 400s

  • @tylermckenna olds motors r not junk at all ...

  • Well in 79, Trans Ams that came with a Pontiac 400 had manual transmissions only. The automatics had Olds 403 in them. It wasn't until 80 they started doing those turbo Trans Ams with the sluggish 301s.

    Can't beat a Pontiac 400.

  • that color is gorgeous!

    that car is fucking beautiful :D

  • its also missing the air extractors on the front fenders. google image 79' trans am and see for yourself

  • its not even a real trans am. its just a firebird with a T/A spoiler, hood, scoop, and stickers. How I know: theres no holes in either the front or rear fenders for mounting wheel spats and the taillights arn't blacked out which all 79' T/As had from the factory. Still kicks ass tho.

  • It has a Trans Am motor

  • @RandyMedion prove that it has a trans am motor

  • @ROBBY639 give me your email I'll send a picture of the motor

  • @oldskoolskater233 im glad im not the only one who could tell that

  • @oldskoolskater233 no all '79 T/A's do not have that from the factory. I know for a fact they don't

  • @oldskoolskater233 im sorry but your wrong in many ways, i own a 78 formual trans am and it has no vents on fenders, and no spoiler, it is a formula and if you try to arue im sorry man but the vin says it all.

  • @oldskoolskater233 It could have been a special order car dude. I drive a special order 1989 Trans Am and the only thing Trans Am on the car is the motor and the interior. It has the Formula hood, suspension and WS6 rims and the rest is all base Firebird. The only reason it registers as a Trans Am is because of the motor.

  • Wow. A Trans Am driver rockin the mullet. What a surprise!

  • its a 403 because it says 6.6litre. If it was a 400 it would say T/A 6.6

  • It's a 400 T/A 6.6

  • @RandyMedion same with mine.

  • smokey and the bandit!! nice car bro

  • if he floored it he would win by a mile cause i own 1980 trans am BLK/BLK with 4 speed

  • if the car was a 4 speed standard it would of beat that truck by lots more

  • 403 and 400 are both considered to be 6.6L. All trans ams that year came with the 6.6L unless they didnt come with the decals im pretty damn sure. I got a 79 myself with a 403 and my shakers decals has the 6.6l decals

  • Olds 403 equiped were "6.6 litre "decals. Pontiac 400 were " TA 6.6" decals The only way to get a Pontiac 400 in 1979 was with a 4 speed. Olds 403 motors were only available with a automatic.

  • if it has the 454 then it must be a 78 not a 79 unless he dropped it in there becuz the 79 trans am doesnt come stock with a 454 lol just saying

  • Pontiacs NEVER came stock with a 454, since that was a Chevy motor. The 455 Pontiac was discontinued well before the 1977 model year, so if you are talking stock motors that car can only have a 400 or a 403.

  • lol i know a 454 is a chevy motor.. i was saying thats what he has in it.. it came stock with a 403 turbo 3 speed auto.. its now a 454 bored to a 460.. minor performance mods.. elderbrock heads.. i think its a 800 racing carbuerator... optima battery..and traction bars.. its 520hp to the wheels

  • I have the same car. It looks like the same color too.

  • 400 or 403?

  • just noticed myself, the title says 6.6l so it should be a 400

  • my uncle has the exact same car only its the bandit edition and its a 454 lol

  • A 454? That's a Chevy motor! Did you mean 455? That was a Pontiac motor, but it was not available in the Bandit Edition. They only came with a 400.

  • guy actually has a mullet!

  • ahahaha

  • hemi is not for speed but torque

  • yeah because your a dumbass

  • I'd take the HEMI over that car

  • wow

    what a beautiful car

  • thanks a lot!

  • Ik zou op het eind ook remmen als 't beestje zo begint te roken.

  • dat is zand op de weg

  • Ah!, Lekkere motor trouwens in de Trans Am

  • haha ja, is opgevoerd! hij is van mij en mn zusje:P

Loading...
Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more