He has more wonderful vocal range, he more handsome and bright and clean
And that's right, a measure of choose who is better singer is how he could sing the most DIFFICULT song easily and made an unbelivable tone that none can do the same thing. Not only sing sing sing '' ha hu ha hi" because everybody can sing (or dancing), everybody.
In response to all of the endless bickering on this video: These singers are both great, Andy Williams is just more technically skilled. It doesn't mean he is better, as that is a subjective term for the listener to decide.
2 men in a class of there own the worlds best Entertainer and one of the worlds best voices together just having fun ya want passion watch sammy sing what kind of fool am i ya want vocal talent watch andy singing speak softly love the last note he sings is amazing
@CateMdll R U OUT OF YOUR MIND ..Sammy was one of the greatest singers of the century the most talented of the rat pack and a triple triple threat he blew that performance out of the water while Andy could just stand there in amazement he was the most underrated talent ever born to this Earth and as a white person the fact is it absolutely was in my opinion because he was Black
@kyolym and Andy was known to be quite a snob with some performers it is a well known fact that he snubbed Barbra Streisand from being a guest on his show because he though she was unattractive which is why she has never preformed with him and refused to come on his show when she was asked again after she became a huge star she has mentioned this snub once in an interview years ago. Sammy on the other hand was a good friend of Barbras although they never preformed together.
I wonder what it was like back then to turn on the tv set and see something like this rather than what we see now? Must have been very nice. Wish I was there instead!
Scooping's often done when the note is either difficult to reach or place and you slide onto it. It's occasionally an ornamentation. Davis is less assured in placement and intonation so he scoops to get to notes he can't hit directly.
Nope, range isn't about taste. It's about vocal capacity, training and technique. Your preferences don't alter the vocal capacities of artists. You may simply prefer a singer for other reasons. Nope, diction and intonation are not about taste, they are technical skills. Andy doesn't scoop on difficult pitch intervals, he has better technique. Davis does scoop and bend when notes are difficult for him, because his technique is of a lesser caliber.
I didn't mean to imply range was about taste, I said I was leaving it out... then again it doesn't matter very much either as long as they have a decent range, some highly acclaimed singers had a poor range, similarly you could have the best range going and horrible tone, that gets you nowhere. Crosby scooped, what is the problem with scooping a note? You are mistaking adornments with lack of skill. I prefer Sammy's diction and intonation on a lot of songs. You don't. Your opinion and mine vary.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
There are as many techniques as there are singers. Also, don't forget that singers of older styles scooped a lot just as a way to ornament their voices. You have to acknowledge that they had two totally different voices suited to different types of music. For instance, Sammy's vibrato is much more attractive to me than Andy's, because it is more vigorous. Also, Sammy was born with a naturally smaller range than Andy. It doesn't speak about his way singing that his range is smaller.
No, it speaks to Sammy Davis' inferior instrument. You may like the way he sings better than the way Andy Williams sings, but Williams has the better instrument and the better technique.
No, wrong again. It isn't inferior, it's just less efficient. Whether or not one is actually better is subjective because there are so many factors to consider, such as beauty and phrasing. Let me guess, you're some university student or voice teacher that only hears technique and fails to comprehend musicality, phrasing, and passion. That is so typical of today's singers: they forget that a voice is a means to an end, and that that particular end is to express something.
No subjectivity isn't relevant to musicality or beauty, taste may lead you to prefer an inferior voice and efficiency is indeed a factor in beauty. I'm a choreographer singer and dancer, and have been for 30 years. Your childish insult to universities and their faculties speaks to your ignorance. All the university voice teachers with whom I've studied are expressive and passionate. The better a voice is, the more potential it has for expression.
Ignorance? Explain to me why, in the past 100 years, singing has gone to shit. Listen to the great tenors of the past: Caruso, Gigli, Bjorling, etc. Now look at what we have today: Piotr Beczala and Juan Diego Florez: that's it. Somewhere along the line, we screwed up, and the only people to blame are teachers. Also, if you think for a second that a technically perfect voice is more expressive, listen to B.B. King, Jeff Buckley, or nearly any blues singer for that matter.
Yes, your comments about university faculty were ignorant. There is much fine singing today and many fine teachers. Yes, a technically perfect voice has great capacity for expression. Whether you dislike two tenors is immaterial.
I'm saying that those are the ONLY two tenors worth listening today. Whether or not a voice is technically perfect has no meaning. What makes us sing is a desire to unleash our emotions. That's it plain and simple. I've seen many singers who were technically perfect, but lacked that singular quality.
Two tenors are immaterial to your assertion. Technical skill is the underpinning of great singing. Many people who lack technique sing poorly, but singing isn't technique alone. If you have good technique you have a better instrument with which to express things and the likelihood of a longer, healthier career.
It doesn't change the fact that your idea of technically perfect singing seems to be based on how high a person can sing (because Andy Williams is able to sing higher). Have you heard of something called a baritone?
"Andy Williams has SUPERIOR RANGE, pitch accuracy, diction and intonation in comparison with Sammy Davis."
By the way, they're both in tune the entire time and Andy Williams actually gasps a little bit in the first minute, which is considered a sign of bad breathing. And they're both equally understandable when it comes to diction. All your bullshit comparisons amount to almost nothing. They are two different artists and you have to respect that.
@phantom4087 very well-said. that explains why masses today think mariah carey and christina aguilera are good singers, forgetting that scaling octaves does not and should not equate to good singing. modern-day 'good' singers have totally neglected the emotion/phrasing component that was expressed so well by singers like sammy.
No, it's not taste, There are objective standards for vocal skill and dance technique. Andy Williams has superior range, pitch accuracy, diction and intonation in comparison with Sammy Davis and Davis is an accomplished tap dancer and Williams is not. Art isn't solely a matter to taste, it's also a matter of objective standards.
I'll leave out "superior range" as I admit I haven't watched them both and concluded "oh he has a 3 octave range and he has a 21/2 octave range". But it is all to taste, I have never found Andy to have better pitching than Davis, and clearly Andy's diction and intonation are to your taste. I prefer Sammy's on many an occasion (though I probably prefer Andy's version of Impossible Dream). Your objective standards are not the same as mine. Simple. Otherwise everybody would think the same.
To a degree, but vocal talent, ability to hold a note for a prolonged time, timing, tune and tone all define vocal and singing talent. Andy had few equals in popular music at that time.
To bad we don't have professional singers that can perform like this anymore. It seems back then in the 30's,40's,50's,60's, and 70's we had real talent in the entertainment industry( movies, tv shows, music, and comedy). Now everything is dumbed down and second rate garbage. Must be a reflection of our sad pathetic society.
Man. Sammy just steals the show again ^_^. He didn't get to steal with his singing so he just broke out in dance! Amazing. Can ANYONE steal his thunder? SAMMY FTW!!!! But I gotta admit, I do like Andy Williams more now lol.
Excuse you who do not know anything about Sammy, He was just as good or better, this was Andys show , he's the guest star, mayber before you talk you should learn more about Sammy! He was a powerhouse of a voice!!
I disagree. I consider Williams to be the best of the crooners, better than Sinatra and Bennett. He was a clearly better singer than Davis, but Davis was a FAR better entertainer. He was the whole package on stage, great dancer, very good singer, and he was comedic as well. He was great.
Your personal insults and attacks aside, my comment was related to how great a singer Andy Williams is, not a negative comment about anyone else. Sammy was a great singer. That is without question. Andy was just a slight notch above in terms of singing. Now, as to dancing, Sammy was amazing!
How can you send me a message saying andy williams is better than Sammy davis jr.????
What is that? and for the record Sammy runs circles around andy williams. "i'm not that kind of person to compare, but you seem the type that likes to cause trouble. "good day sir"
I assume since this has Sammy Davis Jr and you're talking about MJ you're saying that he could dance Sammy under the table...which of course is not true. MJ never had the ability that Sammy had nor James Brown. Now today in comparison with him in the 80's. Yes, I'm sure he could dance most under the table because most dancers today suck and all the greats and legends are no longer with us or are too old to perform like they once did.
And they reckon Michael Jackson can dance! Man, put him next to Sammy and he'd just look stupid. With that speed, timing, and reflexes Sammy would have been a darn good boxer!
They were knocking each other out.
fourpreps 1 month ago
WOW!!!! *Shiny eyes* 8D
spiritfired 5 months ago
jaw dropping...unbelievable talent
crazybluedevil4 6 months ago
Andy is better
He has more wonderful vocal range, he more handsome and bright and clean
And that's right, a measure of choose who is better singer is how he could sing the most DIFFICULT song easily and made an unbelivable tone that none can do the same thing. Not only sing sing sing '' ha hu ha hi" because everybody can sing (or dancing), everybody.
so....
Andy is an EXTRAORDINARY singer.
CateMdll 8 months ago 7
Damn- this stuff is timeless. No fireworks. No light show. No gimmicks. No lavish set. No Gaga costumes.
Just raw talent harnessed by gifted pros.
This is why these guys and their peers were "entertainers" and "performers" ... not "artists".
"Artists". Spare me, please.
1981OSNY 8 months ago
I know this is waaaaaaaay off topic but MEN WERE A LOT MORE COMFORTABLE BEING CLOSE TO EACH OTHERS FACES BACK THEN. It's on all of the old vids.
MscBlggr 9 months ago
sammy davis jr was the early michael jackson, he was one of a kind.
raygluv57 1 year ago
my goodness andy's got soul!!! haha I love it!! those two are amazing and timeless!
ClassicsWEREandARE 1 year ago 2
First beatboxer = Sammy?
Hoobahoo 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
In response to all of the endless bickering on this video: These singers are both great, Andy Williams is just more technically skilled. It doesn't mean he is better, as that is a subjective term for the listener to decide.
pie0my 1 year ago
Excellent,thanks for posting this!
menotyoudude 1 year ago
I got to tell you men ....i haven't watch tv since 9/11,yo me tv is crap and death
ashbrauw 1 year ago
Such original talent!!
wezie13 1 year ago
2 men in a class of there own the worlds best Entertainer and one of the worlds best voices together just having fun ya want passion watch sammy sing what kind of fool am i ya want vocal talent watch andy singing speak softly love the last note he sings is amazing
grantieboy19 1 year ago 16
@grantieboy19 Can sammy make those unbelieveable angelic last note? without dance of course..
Sammy is a great entertainer not a great singer
Andy is a wonderful singer!!
Do not deny love story and moon river, or do not listen to those songs at all, ever!
CateMdll 8 months ago 4
@CateMdll Both Andy Williams and Sammy Davis Jr. were/are excellent vocalists. This video is definitely a treat to see.
Phlincke 4 months ago
@CateMdll R U OUT OF YOUR MIND ..Sammy was one of the greatest singers of the century the most talented of the rat pack and a triple triple threat he blew that performance out of the water while Andy could just stand there in amazement he was the most underrated talent ever born to this Earth and as a white person the fact is it absolutely was in my opinion because he was Black
kyolym 1 day ago
@kyolym and Andy was known to be quite a snob with some performers it is a well known fact that he snubbed Barbra Streisand from being a guest on his show because he though she was unattractive which is why she has never preformed with him and refused to come on his show when she was asked again after she became a huge star she has mentioned this snub once in an interview years ago. Sammy on the other hand was a good friend of Barbras although they never preformed together.
kyolym 1 day ago
Great footage! We share a love for classic jazz! 5 awesome stars!
enjoythevoyage 2 years ago
SO MUCH TALENT!!
atowari 2 years ago
I wonder what it was like back then to turn on the tv set and see something like this rather than what we see now? Must have been very nice. Wish I was there instead!
bookworm1818 2 years ago
sammy was so good
Blackjesus3 2 years ago
Scooping's often done when the note is either difficult to reach or place and you slide onto it. It's occasionally an ornamentation. Davis is less assured in placement and intonation so he scoops to get to notes he can't hit directly.
bang2b 2 years ago 9
Nope, range isn't about taste. It's about vocal capacity, training and technique. Your preferences don't alter the vocal capacities of artists. You may simply prefer a singer for other reasons. Nope, diction and intonation are not about taste, they are technical skills. Andy doesn't scoop on difficult pitch intervals, he has better technique. Davis does scoop and bend when notes are difficult for him, because his technique is of a lesser caliber.
bang2b 2 years ago 7
This has been flagged as spam show
I didn't mean to imply range was about taste, I said I was leaving it out... then again it doesn't matter very much either as long as they have a decent range, some highly acclaimed singers had a poor range, similarly you could have the best range going and horrible tone, that gets you nowhere. Crosby scooped, what is the problem with scooping a note? You are mistaking adornments with lack of skill. I prefer Sammy's diction and intonation on a lot of songs. You don't. Your opinion and mine vary.
Xahne 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
There are as many techniques as there are singers. Also, don't forget that singers of older styles scooped a lot just as a way to ornament their voices. You have to acknowledge that they had two totally different voices suited to different types of music. For instance, Sammy's vibrato is much more attractive to me than Andy's, because it is more vigorous. Also, Sammy was born with a naturally smaller range than Andy. It doesn't speak about his way singing that his range is smaller.
phantom4087 1 year ago
No, it speaks to Sammy Davis' inferior instrument. You may like the way he sings better than the way Andy Williams sings, but Williams has the better instrument and the better technique.
bang2b 1 year ago 7
This has been flagged as spam show
No, wrong again. It isn't inferior, it's just less efficient. Whether or not one is actually better is subjective because there are so many factors to consider, such as beauty and phrasing. Let me guess, you're some university student or voice teacher that only hears technique and fails to comprehend musicality, phrasing, and passion. That is so typical of today's singers: they forget that a voice is a means to an end, and that that particular end is to express something.
phantom4087 1 year ago
No subjectivity isn't relevant to musicality or beauty, taste may lead you to prefer an inferior voice and efficiency is indeed a factor in beauty. I'm a choreographer singer and dancer, and have been for 30 years. Your childish insult to universities and their faculties speaks to your ignorance. All the university voice teachers with whom I've studied are expressive and passionate. The better a voice is, the more potential it has for expression.
bang2b 1 year ago 6
This has been flagged as spam show
Ignorance? Explain to me why, in the past 100 years, singing has gone to shit. Listen to the great tenors of the past: Caruso, Gigli, Bjorling, etc. Now look at what we have today: Piotr Beczala and Juan Diego Florez: that's it. Somewhere along the line, we screwed up, and the only people to blame are teachers. Also, if you think for a second that a technically perfect voice is more expressive, listen to B.B. King, Jeff Buckley, or nearly any blues singer for that matter.
phantom4087 1 year ago
Yes, your comments about university faculty were ignorant. There is much fine singing today and many fine teachers. Yes, a technically perfect voice has great capacity for expression. Whether you dislike two tenors is immaterial.
bang2b 1 year ago 8
I'm saying that those are the ONLY two tenors worth listening today. Whether or not a voice is technically perfect has no meaning. What makes us sing is a desire to unleash our emotions. That's it plain and simple. I've seen many singers who were technically perfect, but lacked that singular quality.
phantom4087 1 year ago
Two tenors are immaterial to your assertion. Technical skill is the underpinning of great singing. Many people who lack technique sing poorly, but singing isn't technique alone. If you have good technique you have a better instrument with which to express things and the likelihood of a longer, healthier career.
bang2b 1 year ago 7
This has been flagged as spam show
It doesn't change the fact that your idea of technically perfect singing seems to be based on how high a person can sing (because Andy Williams is able to sing higher). Have you heard of something called a baritone?
phantom4087 1 year ago
No, nothing I said indicated any such thing. I myself am a baritone.
bang2b 1 year ago 4
This has been flagged as spam show
Ok, now you're just lying: here's your quote:
"Andy Williams has SUPERIOR RANGE, pitch accuracy, diction and intonation in comparison with Sammy Davis."
By the way, they're both in tune the entire time and Andy Williams actually gasps a little bit in the first minute, which is considered a sign of bad breathing. And they're both equally understandable when it comes to diction. All your bullshit comparisons amount to almost nothing. They are two different artists and you have to respect that.
phantom4087 1 year ago
Range isn't "higher", it's higher and lower. Two artists, and one is superior as a singer. The other as a dancer.
bang2b 1 year ago 10
@bang2b Hahaha right
Vvie007 1 year ago
@bang2b The better a voice is, the more potential it has for expression.
I love this line..
CateMdll 8 months ago 4
This has been flagged as spam show
@phantom4087 very well-said. that explains why masses today think mariah carey and christina aguilera are good singers, forgetting that scaling octaves does not and should not equate to good singing. modern-day 'good' singers have totally neglected the emotion/phrasing component that was expressed so well by singers like sammy.
kokede 1 year ago
No, it's not taste, There are objective standards for vocal skill and dance technique. Andy Williams has superior range, pitch accuracy, diction and intonation in comparison with Sammy Davis and Davis is an accomplished tap dancer and Williams is not. Art isn't solely a matter to taste, it's also a matter of objective standards.
bang2b 2 years ago 12
This has been flagged as spam show
I'll leave out "superior range" as I admit I haven't watched them both and concluded "oh he has a 3 octave range and he has a 21/2 octave range". But it is all to taste, I have never found Andy to have better pitching than Davis, and clearly Andy's diction and intonation are to your taste. I prefer Sammy's on many an occasion (though I probably prefer Andy's version of Impossible Dream). Your objective standards are not the same as mine. Simple. Otherwise everybody would think the same.
Xahne 2 years ago
Andy's a better singer than Sammy. Sammy's a better dancer, quite plainly. The rest is a matter of taste.
bang2b 2 years ago 16
Plainly speaking - it is ALL a matter of taste.
Xahne 2 years ago
To a degree, but vocal talent, ability to hold a note for a prolonged time, timing, tune and tone all define vocal and singing talent. Andy had few equals in popular music at that time.
Waldo99 2 years ago 15
This has been flagged as spam show
@bang2b I prefer Sammy's singing to Andy's.
filmmekker 1 year ago
classic
yoimlo 2 years ago 2
What a rhythm and that musicality!!!!
Excellent!!!
ziamolly08 2 years ago 2
Truly awesome! Sammy is great!!!!
juicyphxaz 2 years ago
Agreed, and Andy is just a little better, but both are great.
Waldo99 2 years ago 7
Awesome! Thanks for posting!
SergioVellatti 2 years ago
Hahaha lookit those legs go. That's one cool cat.
nndaystar 2 years ago 6
Oh mein Gott, waren die gut............!
eigenstimme 2 years ago
lol lol lol Wow !!!!!
kiaketa 2 years ago 2
LOL XD
Xab3lly 2 years ago 2
CLASSIC WHERE ARE ALL THE GREATS????
mmgdavis 2 years ago 5
The great stage in the sky for the most part.
Waldo99 2 years ago
No one today can try to compare! Peace
dolly244 2 years ago 5
Goddamn...that's all I could say. O_O
bksgoldglove 2 years ago
To bad we don't have professional singers that can perform like this anymore. It seems back then in the 30's,40's,50's,60's, and 70's we had real talent in the entertainment industry( movies, tv shows, music, and comedy). Now everything is dumbed down and second rate garbage. Must be a reflection of our sad pathetic society.
KaraLarson26 3 years ago 11
2 brilliant entertainers!
TheGreatAndyWILLIAMS 3 years ago 5
Earthshaking amounts of talent in one place. This is really stunning.
ASSEMblerEX 3 years ago 3
I enjoyed Andy's soulfulness in this one almost as much as Sammy did! Good Times!
Merbeck0327 3 years ago
Amazing!
gangerollo 3 years ago
This video is SPECTACULAR! I enjoyed it thoroughly! Thank you so much for posting!
kenslavin1961 3 years ago
OMG!...what a legendary pair!..the great Andy Williams and the legendary Sammy Davis Jnr!...oh God how can you beat that?
LoverOfEverythingOld 3 years ago 3
Andy sounds out of breath but he still sings so well. I feel like he must have done something tiring before this performance.
Captain0Fish 3 years ago
That is odd, isn't it? Yet he does it throughout the song, so maybe he wasn't used to belting out? He couldn't have been nervous?
UltraAmbiguousID 3 years ago
Man. Sammy just steals the show again ^_^. He didn't get to steal with his singing so he just broke out in dance! Amazing. Can ANYONE steal his thunder? SAMMY FTW!!!! But I gotta admit, I do like Andy Williams more now lol.
draganryo 3 years ago 9
On a bad "off" day, both of these guys would blow all of today's best stars out of the water!
This was a lot of fun-thanks, burtmurdoch-God bless you!
owenatkins 3 years ago 19
my grandpa was so talented now I know where I get it from
alexissingleton 3 years ago
bravo...ten stars.
cannuckistan 3 years ago
Now THIS is talent! SDJ...what a classy and talented guy he was!
visor109 3 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
sammy wow possibly one of the maost talented rthymically men to ever walk the earth. and that dancing possibly the best ever. thanks sammy
chuckkenn 3 years ago
He's almost as good a singer as Andy Williams, but not quite.
Waldo99 3 years ago 7
This has been flagged as spam show
Excuse you who do not know anything about Sammy, He was just as good or better, this was Andys show , he's the guest star, mayber before you talk you should learn more about Sammy! He was a powerhouse of a voice!!
cammicty 3 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
please my granfather was waaaaaaaay better than what's his name.
alexissingleton 3 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
I love Andy, but Sammy was surely the better singer.
winsome1235 3 years ago
I disagree. I consider Williams to be the best of the crooners, better than Sinatra and Bennett. He was a clearly better singer than Davis, but Davis was a FAR better entertainer. He was the whole package on stage, great dancer, very good singer, and he was comedic as well. He was great.
Waldo99 3 years ago 8
This is fantastic I love it!
prodigiesofpeace 3 years ago
Sammy is one of the best improvisor there is.
LetItFloat 3 years ago
America's Golden Era of talent.
Makes you wonder if a duo like this went on American Idol (never watch that show), if the judges would have the good taste and sense to keep them.
roxyrowboat 3 years ago 3
I love a lot !
coc177 3 years ago
They are fantastic !!!! Andy will always be my favorite singer but Sammy's amazing dancer that Michael Jackson will look like an amateur.
kundimanpinoy 3 years ago 7
This has been flagged as spam show
To your foolish comment, in the 60's Micheal danced tap, and everything, he danced with James brown, do your research first before you speak.
Today MJ is still amazing and can dance most under the table! Don't demean his dancing because you don't have the rhythm and cannot dance!
cammicty 3 years ago
Your personal insults and attacks aside, my comment was related to how great a singer Andy Williams is, not a negative comment about anyone else. Sammy was a great singer. That is without question. Andy was just a slight notch above in terms of singing. Now, as to dancing, Sammy was amazing!
Waldo99 3 years ago 8
This has been flagged as spam show
How can you send me a message saying andy williams is better than Sammy davis jr.????
What is that? and for the record Sammy runs circles around andy williams. "i'm not that kind of person to compare, but you seem the type that likes to cause trouble. "good day sir"
juicyphxaz 2 years ago
We simply disagree. As noted, both are great in my opinion. While you see only one as great, I appreciate both.
Waldo99 2 years ago 6
I assume since this has Sammy Davis Jr and you're talking about MJ you're saying that he could dance Sammy under the table...which of course is not true. MJ never had the ability that Sammy had nor James Brown. Now today in comparison with him in the 80's. Yes, I'm sure he could dance most under the table because most dancers today suck and all the greats and legends are no longer with us or are too old to perform like they once did.
draganryo 3 years ago
All of the above - Youtube rules! Sammy was show biz incarnate. Andy still sings great. Rock On. (David Essex, how'd he get in here?)
soundslikefrank 3 years ago
And they reckon Michael Jackson can dance! Man, put him next to Sammy and he'd just look stupid. With that speed, timing, and reflexes Sammy would have been a darn good boxer!
RIP Champ!
gragrn 3 years ago 8
Pretty brave of Andy, who is very talented, to get up there with Sammy, who really has no peer.
u2baah 4 years ago 6
utube is so much better than tv....its great 2 see these old shows and great talent! cheers!!!
mettanc 4 years ago 23
u r so right... ;)
burtmurdoch 4 years ago
I second that...
catquack 4 years ago 5
yes it dose.most tv shows have crappy story,
very racist,utube is 100 times better!
choiyounghi 4 years ago 3
I adore Sammy, but I'm afraid I've been taking Andy for granted. Shame on me.
misspaddylee 4 years ago 10
doesn't matter... the legends unleashed in youtube... =)
burtmurdoch 4 years ago
Perfect. I play this duet over & over, studying it, relishing it. Astonishing Talents.
SWTrevor 4 years ago 4
they were amazing...
burtmurdoch 4 years ago
This was DELIGHTFUL!!!
Keedeeg 4 years ago
sure do KeeDeeG =D...sorry sis kinda bz lately with works i wanna grab some mp3's frm ure latest hits alfie. hehehe...
burtmurdoch 4 years ago
fabulous!
sdjr1fan 4 years ago 2
thanks. =D
burtmurdoch 4 years ago