Clinton Edwards Caught Conspiring with Mic on...

[gablio77]

STAGED AS FUCK

[eightyrogue]

You wouldn't understand the context unless you were closing following the race at the time like I was. They were talking about getting Mike Gravel and Dennis Kucinich excluded from further debates. After this, Mike Gravel was never seen at another debate.

[globelX]

Funny how things work out - the group was made smaller - but with only Obama and Biden left. The ones deemed not serious.

[kdTV2Lvr]

Isn't that the point of a nomination? To get rid of the opponents?

[alteredlame666]

They were talking about the rest of the candidates. They wanted a it just to be Hillary, Edwards, and Obama.

[Pwells1]

This is completely out of context. They aren't trying to rig an election. The press will jump on anything (and so will internet conspiracy theorists) no matter how trivial, in order to get ratings (or attention).

[bwetebest]

Everyone Now understands that only BARACK OBAMA has the Audacity to lead this Country at a point when its moral authority on challenging real Global issues like Environment change, Terrorism,poverty and diseases is questioned.

Lets wake up for one Purpose Change! then we shall look into our differences later.

I am Fired up

Barack Obama 08

[0rip0]

@bwetebest - How's that "change" thing working out for you? Sucker.

[webmonkeymon]

I love this video! it is how it works behind the scenes. Politicians only care about winning the race. ofcourse they do not want give up time to those who most likely will not win. That means they will get less time infront of viewers. They both agree easily. They say its about change and I am sure they are serious about change, but they do not care more about their kinds of changes not fundamental political change. The only people who want that is the american people.

[nodoubtish]

This is completely out of context... I mean come on.

[luxeluxe]

Edwards '08!

[cartmanj24]

Ron Paul 08

[madmonkey756]

how in the hell are we gonna get Mike Gravel to be president now? what can we do to get him the nomination??

[gravel2008]

We're doing our best.

[Baroque1750]

Lol...waste of time.

[Lotsofnickles]

The Fix Is In folks!

[bnk1310]

Are we supposed to learn something from this outof context video clip and the broken text with in it, which allegedly "interprets" what might have been said by two politicians in a noisy crowded room?

[Jimraynor45]

Unless you know what they really said, you should embrace it unless you know better.

[castaway83]

If I was an American I'd vote Ron Paul. At least he tells it to ye guys straight. Hillary Clinton! Are ye mad?

[pingish]

I am an American, and I'm voting Ron Paul. Ron Paul 2008!

[janmee6]

The illusion of voting right before our eyes and ears.... I hope not our next president..limiting our decision to vote for who we really want....... lets see we have a choice to vote for Hillary or Edwards!!

[kkloud99]

If you ask yourself after a candidate speaks - What did he really just say? Does it have any meaning? You'll find that its just empty words that sound nice but have zero substance. They just say - I'm against it, it has to change! In the end they never answered the question or say what exactly what their going to do about it.

Gravel does though! He has really solutions! Go listen!

[dasamasa]

MIKE GRAVEL

[DjDialogic]

that is why we should all support Obama!!!!

[well99]

It was pretty lame of them.I dont care what party I want to hear all the canidates messages.I know politics is about the one with big bucks but they damn sure havent bought my vote.

[cyncmaster150]

This video is proof that the democrats have already chosen there President and vice... It will be Hillary or Edwards as presedent and the other as vice. The rest of the democrats are just duds, for people to vote for so Hillay/ Edwards can still win the majority. They're both two-faced liars. If republicans want to win the 08 election all they have to do is play this clip over and over, it will destroy the democratic nominae's

[bzzz52]

they should call Fidel. I'm sure he would help them with the next debate. I,ve got to beleive shes got his Number in her blackberry.

[windows2k3pro]

True

[bms4lifem3]

wow....its a conspiracy that rivals the Iraq war. Trumps Cheney's energy meetings. rolls eyes

[sashaqueenie]

Really, what is so terrible about their exchange.

It wasn't sexual.

It wasn't malicious.

It's all part of politics.

There are more heinous crimes committed by the White House cronies, Gonzales and Karl Rove.

[electrorocket]

Of course it's malicious. It's malicious to the idea of freedom of choice we're supposed to have. By 'serious' candidates, they mean candidates hand selected by the elite.

[sashaqueenie]

You had Freedom of Choice and what has that brought America????!!!!

You chose a cheerleading, recovering alcoholic, born-again-Christian as the President not once but twice!!! Talk about malicious.

You and the Neocons doomed America with your choices.

[CBHellion]

Really? I thought they meant the candidates who actually have a chance at winning and aren't in it just to gain publicity. There's more conspiracy in the White House than in these few comments from the front runners.

[allileoop]

"who actually have a chance at winning"

Who decides who has a chance at winning? Hilary? The media? How about letting THE PEOPLE decide who is most serious by LETTING EVERYONE TALK

[utubesucks2003]

I actually agree with what Edwards and Hillary are speaking about, only that they should be cut out.

[CBHellion]

Exactly. Smaller panels, more serious debate.

[allileoop]

Why not just cut it down to Hilary and Edwards then. Hey I know, how about just Hilary.

Smaller doesnt mean more serious... it means less diversity of opinions.

[allileoop]

If small=serious the Bush has the most serious brain ever

[sashaqueenie]

The truth of the matter is this:

Bush would have gone to Iraq regardless of whether Hillary, Edwards or the rest of Congress had agreed to or not. He has already stated:

Bush Says He Will Not Withdraw From Iraq Even If Laura And Barney The Dog Are The Only Ones Supporting Him

[utubesucks2003]

Actually there was a microphone leak similar to this where Barney was venting some serious lamenting about the current Iraq situation, but of course the white house spun it.

[WhiteHousedotGov]

UNIVERSAL HEALTHCARE NOW!

Click on my name, to see my flagged anti-Bush video.

Powerful.

Hated by censors.

Loved by others.

Leave a comment, to let me know what you think...

[sashaqueenie]

This is worse than Bush's cronyism?

This is worse than the lies and dishonesty of the Bush administration? The weapons of mass destruction, Libby's pardon and the escapades of Osama who is alive and well?

Remember, the ones who bash Hillary and Edwards are the very same people who put Bush in the White House, not once but twice. America is now the laughing stock of the entire world.

[FlamingHound]

dude, who said it's worse? Hillary and Edwards are political chameleons. both voted for the war when Kucinich knew and said it was based on lies.

[sashaqueenie]

They voted it because your Bush cherry picked intel and presented on a silver platter that Iraq was a threat.

Don't blame them. Blame the Captain of the ship, the one who was on watch when Sept 11th happened.

It happened during his watch and he still has not made right what happened. The real culprit has not been caught.

Hold Bush accountable.

I don't see that happening, Mr. 28%.

[electrorocket]

The real culprit is the elephant in the living room. Come on, it's so obvious Bush need only capture himself to make it right. I mean, there's not even any charges against Osama for 9/11! His supposed confession is not even him! Come on people, wake up!

[allileoop]

I do blame them. Dems and Repubs are both corrupt. We need a REAL change, not just a superficial one.

VOTE RON PAUL

Watch some of his vids on his youtube channel. I guarantee youll be hooked after listening to him for an hour.

I was a dem, I registered repub just to vote for Ron Paul

[allileoop]

RON PAUL 2008!

[puppydogbreath]

Great News.

Mike has been invited to participate in the LGBT debate.

Bad News.....

Gravel not being invited to yet another debate. The AFL-CIO debate (America's Union Movement).

I hope everyone will take the time to call.

Contact: Steve Smith

(202) 637-5018

(202) 412-4440 (cell)

Please, your call will make a difference.

[Krabbas]

Haha. John Edwards calling some other Dems "not serious". Pot. Kettle. Black.

[electrorocket]

The CFR plans to dismantle US sovereignty and usher in a new world order. Edwards, Clinton, Bush, Gore, Giuliani, McCain, ALL of the candidates, D and R are members. That makes the only candidates that are 'serious' Gravel, Kucinich, and #1, Ron Paul!

[gmfutube]

GRAVEL is my first choice, but you are exactly right about what is going on!

Why the hell can't people see any of this?

Shouldn't the fact that these 3 HONEST men are being pushed aside BECAUSE they are honest and not part of "the game"?

[electrorocket]

Why can't they see this? Is that a rhetorical question? It's because the powers ushering in the one world government are the same ones that control the major media, silly!

Ron Paul 2008!!!

[CBHellion]

I don't see a problem with their comments. They are talking about having a smaller, more private debate with the top front runners in order to make it a better debate. People like to generate conspiracy theories about secret alliances and backstabbing like these politicians are evil and vindictive. The fact of the matter is that they know how the game is played. They know what works and what doesn't. People are reading way too much into their conversation.

[gmfutube]

This isn't THEIR fucking game! wtf is wrong with you that you are willing to let a handful of people tell you who you can even hear from in a debate when the 1st primary is 6 mos away?

My god, you people are as stupid as the neo-cons.

[CBHellion]

WTF is wrong with you that you take a few comments and turn it into more than it should be? Smaller panels means more one on one time from the candidates. Try not reading too much into things. It makes you look like an idiot freaking out.

[allileoop]

"Smaller panels means more one on one time from the candidates."

Which candidates? Not all of them. Just the ones Hialry and Edwards think are OK. Get it? If you are running for office, you shouldnt get to decide who you debate.

If you only debate people who agree with you its not much of a debate. Its the same reason the repubs tried to keep Paul out of the debates.

"It makes you look like an idiot freaking out."

Well you look like a sheep. BAAAAAA

[allileoop]

LOL

Why not let them choose who gets to be president then?

[CBHellion]

Yes, because they are obviously conspiring to hijack the primary. Come on people, lets stop with the conspiracy.

[selfTrust1]

The link you gave did not work

On another note, I hate CFR members (Hilary and Edwards). Don't complain when we have one currency with Mexico and Canada. It's on its way.

[selfTrust1]

Americans are dumber than I thought. I thought for sure that after Bush that people would scrutinize the candidates, but apparently not. No one seems to care that Hilary is willing to go to war with Iran, and she won't even mention Bush's impeachment. Scary to know what the next few generations will be up against. Research the candidiates,and don't let the media decide for you.(Yeah right.)

[drunkdecoy]

Meh people know Clinton wouldnt go to war with Iran short of Iran declareing war themselves. Why would she mention Bush's impeachement, WHY i ask you. The only thing it would do is cause more wasteful press, its simple math they dont have the votes for impeachment so bringing it up will be a waste of time.

[gmfutube]

MIKE GRAVEL didn't "have the votes" when he did a one man filibuster to end the draft, and therefore the war in Vietnam!

That is a BS excuse!

[gmfutube]

We are indeed, aren't we? It is simply amazing that this nation ever became anything with people this stupid.

People get desperate and die to make improvements and their children and grandchildren throw it all away because they are lazy and ignorant.

[allileoop]

RON PAUL 2008

repubs and dems are two sides of the same coin

RON PAUL IS DIFFERENT

[FellowesGuy]

Pure evil

[shaire99]

Gee,  thanks for posting this 'Grand Conspiracy'. Think I'll post my grandmother talking to the mailman. Sure do appreciate it.

[allileoop]

Its not a "grand conspiracy"

It yet another indication that our politicians aer corrupt

The reason we hold debates is to find out where the CANDIDATES stand, not some of them, not the front runner, but ALL OF THEM.

They are trying to silence people to gain more power for themselves. She cant debate gravel or kucinich because they have been steadfast and consistent

[bigsid920]

This tells us a lot about Clinton and Edwards. They smile and shake your hand and at the same time go behind your back and try to exclude you from debates. Remember this the next time you see them on TV shaking hands with registered voters.

[micsc50]

Edwards is doing her. Bill can't.

[gemini067]

misc50, I don,t think anyone could do hillary, it is the other way around, hillary is doing all of us.

[micsc50]

The Breck Boy will do anything to get in the White House. Even if it means doing Hillary . He wants to make sure she comes after him for her VP. Edwards would screw a snake in a rock pile if it will get him in power.

[gmfutube]

and somebody forgot the vasoline.

[SOMUCHFORFREEMEDIA]

My channel has the ruth behind this video.

[thereallurker]

sorry, there's no conspiracy here. first of all, the video doesn't mention what they're talking about and anyway, candidates can campaign however ever they want to.

[deandreasx]

Thank you so much they are not doing anything wrong they are saying that there are too many people and not enough time to talk about the real issues

[allileoop]

Phooey

The ones they cut out are the only ones willing to talk about the real issues. Who are they to decide who gets to talk? That should be our decision. Not the people who are running. Would you let them decide who gets the nomination?

[CBHellion]

Please, everyone knows who is a contender in this upcoming election and who is not. They're being real. Lets hear from the people who might actually be nominated.

[gmfutube]

Nothing stopping them from telling you anything right now.

Who are YOU, or the Media to say who can be nominated this early?

Are you aware that JFK was way behind and "had no chance" later than this?

[gmfutube]

The comments here show just how many people who think they are "liberal" or for "change" are just as bad as the neo-cons in their wish to stifle dissension.

WTF is wrong with people? Why can't they see how dangerous these people are?

Why can't they see that they have 2 honest candidates who DO talk about the issues NOW

GRAVEL & KUCINICH!

[deandreasx]

They never once said who will get the nomination but who they want to debate there is there choice not ours no one can stop who gets the nominatoins but if they want to set up their own debate why shouldn't they

[allileoop]

When you control the information you can bend it any way you want.

People use the debates for information, if they exclude someone people have less chance of hearing that candidates views or voting for them

They know this. If it was Romney and Guiliani who did this I bet youd be outraged.

Dems and Repubs, 2 sides of the same coin

RON PAUL IS OUR ONLY HOPE

[deandreasx]

no one HAS to come to the debates they choose two if they want to have MORE debates on the side that will allow the SERIOUS candidates a good chance to be heard what is wrong with that, to be fair i think they should have just said it out in the open but no the less ALL the candidate have there own media outlet to get there point across no one is trying to silent them

[deandreasx]

but if i had to debate Bill Richardson i would be pissed the man doesn't know what he is talking about and is just taking up space I love Mike Gravel but sadly he is way behind in the polls does that mean that no one should debate him no but if i was Hillary or John i would want to try and beat the real competition so what if they dont debate every one who is running if the other candidates like cry baby dennis kucinich stays true to his word he will come out on top in the end

[allileoop]

"Cry baby" Thats a pretty juvenille way of talking about a candidate.

The polls, have you ever been called? Know anyone who has? Who does the polls? Who do they call?

You see only what they want you to see.  If it were repubs doing this you'd be disgusted (as would I )

[allileoop]

"that will allow the SERIOUS candidates "

Who gets to decide who the "serious" candidates are? The candidates themselves? Thats silly

Know what the difference between people who watch TV for to learn about candidates and people who use the net to learn about candidates is?

TV watching is passive, you see what they want you to see (as shown by Hilary and Edwads here)

The internet is interactive. You find what you look for.

[deandreasx]

We will have to agree to disagree but on a common note i dont watch tv because of the high propaganda and i only get my information off of the Internet last year i got rid of my tv altogether, also you are right in saying who gets to decide who is serious but they have the right to have an opinion about which of the candidate in their minds isn't focus on winning as their are if a Repub were to win i would prefer it be Ron Paul but my choice for dem is Mike Gravel

[allileoop]

HAHA Theres two things we agree on, Ron Paul is my man too. I like Gravel and I like Kucinih, but Ron Paul is the whole package. I was a dem, I registered repub just for Paul. I joined a meetup group, this guy is the real deal.

I absolultely WILL NOT vote for any of the other republicans. Gawd if Paul, kucinich or Gravel dont make the nominatiosn I will do one of two things

Vote for Ron Paul anyways - write in

Vote for whatever Dem comes along

sad but true

[gmfutube]

Not all of the candidates have the money to get their message out. The ones who DO are trying to exclude the ones who don't.

WHY? Because they are afraid of what the others say.

e.g like when Gravel nailed Hillary on Bill's fictional "surplus" which was no more than an acounting trick using SS funds.

[deandreasx]

Since not all of the candidate have money to get the message out we have to punish those who do, I dont think anyone is TRYING to decide who get nominated but just giving an opinion on who they think should be nominated Richardson needs to say something or get off the stage

[grantdwalker1]

Russia pulls out of CFE Treaty, Iran asks Japan for Yen instead of U$ for its oil, warning of a hot terrorist summer, falling U$DX nears 80 points; to find out what is going on, check out my recent videos.

[gmfutube]

Time is running out.

[sashaqueenie]

Hillary is right. Focus on a small group of candidates and let them stand up for what they believe in.

Too many cooks ruin the dish.

[micsc50]

She's one of the crooks.

[CBHellion]

I agree completely. There should be several smaller debate panels instead of one big one. That way, you hear more than bits and pieces of their policies.

[allileoop]

Then why call it a "debate" just have each candidate release a clip of what they stand for

Its a DEBATE because they are supposed to DEBATE the other candidates.

[gmfutube]

What is stopping her and Edwards & Obama from standing up for what they believe in now?

Gravel and Kucinich have made their beliefs plain in 1/3 of the time.

[TarotFate]

Need a change?

Vote Ron Paul 2008!

[VerminSupreme08]

Vote Vermin Supreme in 2008

click verminsupremedotcom for less information

[ezs21]

of course FOX found this, who else? But it's true though. We don't need 10 candidates up there when only 3 have a real chance. I mean, Dennis has only 1% in the polls, he can't win with numbers like that. Hillary has 38%, of course she would say that. Look at the republican side, there's so many candidates it's ridiculous. Hillary and Giuliani are the only ones who I believe can win, it just depends on if the nation stays democratic or becomes more republican.

[gmfutube]

Because the first primary vote is 6 mos away and WE the PEOPLE have a RIGHT to hear ALL of the candidates.

Either this is a Debate or it is Entertainment.

[magicstik62]

Why am I not surprised? lol.. I wonder if a lot of people that has been defending her to this point will start scratching their heads. NOT!!!!! Oh well. I can at least hope, can't I???

[HughJNuss]

Disgusting.

[bigsid920]

Good point she shakes their hands and says thanks at the same time plotting to take them out of the debates. That says a lot about both of them. Don't trust them.

[Jadedbylife]

Who gives a crap! I don't believe anything faux news reports anyway! And if they do want to eliminate Kucinich and the other loser candidates than good for them! Go HILLARY 08!

[rjbischof]

Jaded indeed as you welcome enslavement by your Master.

[xxxbeanerxxx]

Fuck Hillary!!!stupid bitch dances around the issues always blames some one else just like when bill got his cocked suck by monica. hillary blamed Monica who accedintly triped and feel in to bill cock

[hellotimetogo]

you don't care about what you just heard? and you think fox news made this up?

You are beyond hope my friend.

[willdfw5]

Actually it was reported by most news organizations

[willdfw5]

OF course she shakes the hand of Dennis Kucinich a second later when she goes back for some more chit chat with Edwards. OUCH!!!

[hellotimetogo]

she shakes his hand because that's what evil does.