I really can't understand how people can get bored by this, it's amazing! I still can believe principles as these can exist. Very good job with the video :)
@picknicktooclick Never understand this? Dude, I study this shit. I will be doing this 4 work later. I love learning about physics and im quite confident that I will get this down, so plz bother someone else.
btw, Im also a martial artist and have a girlfriend, so plz stfu bout that stuff...
THE [ SALEN-GA FLAT EARTH PARADOX ] OF QUANTUM PHYSICS- THE EARTH IS GLOBALLY ROUND TO AN ASTRONAUT AND IS LOCALLY FLAT TO A PEDESTRIAN. A MUCH MORE CLEARER PARADOX THAN SCHRODINGER'S DEAD/LIVE CAT. THE POWERFUL SALENGA PARADOX IS BASED ON HENRI POINCARE'S [ RELATIVITY OF SIMULTANEITY WHICH STATES: " A THING OR PHENOMENA IN NATURE, AND IT'S LOGICAL OPPOSITE ARE BOTH ANTI-LOGICALLY VALID AND TRUE, DEPENDENT UPON A PARTICIPATOR(PHYSICS OBSERVER)EXPERIENCING THE THING OR PHENOMENA".
Just FYI, the uncertainty principle is not a fancy way of saying "I don't know".
It is more a way of saying "I know X is in this area somewhere, but it is impossible for me to pinpoint exactly where it is at any given point in time." With the added probability cloud we can of course tell where X is most of the time but with temporal uncertainty.
It is the simple act of observation which changes the data about the observed object, speed and location. You can't know both.
@melis256 The uncertainty principle gives no physical limitation on identifying the location of a particle. Only that the product of the uncertainty in position and momentum need be greater than some constant. So I can locate where the object is exactly, but its momentum would be completely uncertain.
@melis256 FYI I understand what its saying but here is where you and everyone fail to see. it can not be predicted by using the uncertainty principle. That I can agree with. Why? Well once you except something as being impossible you are lost to that mentality. Your equations try to work around instead of solving! Nothing is impossible only the method by which you approach the problem does it become futile.
Do you actually know how to measure something which does not emit anything in its neutral state? You throw something at it! Be it any kind of particle which can bounce back to your detector, this usually a photon. But oh, it changed the momentum/energy (and maybe even the heading) of the particle you measured because that is exactly what photons do when they interact.
Now you show me a way to measure without interaction.
@melis256 first off they are never at rest (neutral) this is your reference. As you can see here starts the problem. Your reference point is not a fixed point. even if you go with realitivity you might be fixed in reference to something else but it is not out of influence of the rest of the universe. Also all matter and photons are made of waves. which is standing (in reference to itself). But a wave of what? space itself over time and now your back over hundred years to idea of the Ether.
@melis256 first off they are never at rest (neutral) this is your reference. As you can see here starts the problem. Your reference point is not a fixed point. even if you go with realitivity you might be fixed in reference to something else but it is not out of influence of the rest of the universe. Also all matter and photons are made of waves. which is standing (in reference to itself). But a wave of what? space itself over time and now your back over hundred years to idea of the Ether.
@melis256 I wish I did have the answers you seek but all of us are still shooting in the dark. There is the other problem. You can get close but here is something to help Warp things even more. Say you measure 1 amp of current in a wire. Well what about all the other electrons? You could have 10 amps flowing one direction and 9 amps in the other and never know it. Does it matter well if you only look at the ripple in the water then you missed the ocean and sky! And to the back to class I go.
Quantum theory was invented by insecure mathematicians as a tool for exerting their will over those who aren't big enough losers to spend thousands of hours learning insufferably boring and convoluted theories that are obviously false constructions intentionally meant to get revenge on people who spend their time having sex and rolling in meadows and fields, activities that they themselves are incapable of. Have you ever, like, SEEN a quantum entanglement, lol?
It is the simple fact that you can not know the position and the momentum of a partical simutaniously that teleportation will never be possible, using known physical and quantum boundaries. Knowing that tells me that just because it is not possible NOW does not mean it will be impossible forever.
I just realized how counterintuitive this is. In our scale of everyday life large masses generally occupy large space. At the quantum level lagre masses occupy small space. This is the revere of our understanding that Large masses will occupy large spaces. This is of course because of differences in the probabilities of finding them in any particular space will increase as particles lose mass, but nevertheless more space for less mass is a very interesting paradox.
Those who ask 4 help (others need not read). OK, Heisenberg's uncertainty principle states that "the speed (or momentum) and position of a particle at an instant cannot both be known exactly". The more precisely you measure one, the less less you can find out about the other. Heisenberg argued that the very act of observing a particle changes it, making precise knowledge impossible. "So neither the past more the future behavior of any subatomic particle can be predicted with certainty".
Seriously people, what the fuck does this all mean?!?! It really is meaningless.. So you can put tiny words on things that are way beyond our comprehension!!! It does not mean you understand it better!!! Even if I have 1000 words for this universe, I am no closer to understanding it than before. Its sort of pointless =P just a thought
@BomaBoi pointless for people who dont understand it, i dont understand, it, but just because i dont it does not mean no one else does. you have to remember there will also be people who know more in a certain area then you, especally in an area that they have been working with for there whole life
How many Lies do you think you have told in your life? Have you ever stolen anything, even something small? Have you ever looked at a person with lust? Ever used GOD's name as a curse word? If so, GOD sees you as a Lying, thieving, blasphemous, adulterer at heart. The Guilty will end up in Hell. That's not GOD's will. You broke GOD's laws, but Jesus paid your fine! (IF) you Repent, and trust in Christ alone, GOD will forgive every sin you have ever committed, and grant you Eternal life!
The Uncertainty Principle (mathematical way to state "I don't know")
If a scientist doesn't know the anwser they hide it in math. If only they could just say "I don't know" Why because then there wouldn't be 50 years wasted before someone else comes along and says this guy doesn't know what the hell he was talking about and here is the anwser!
@dujl Are you so certain I'm incorrect that you would stick to a path of belief that you have. Here is a tip for you math is representation of what we are trying to understand with a degree of accuratisy. So by using the uncertainty principle in equations you fail to understand the reason so many more questions arrise then answers and lets not forget its still a part of the quantum theory which in itself is speculation. Deal in facts not speculation.
wow, this is fantastic stuff. I never understood it doing A levels, but just got enought to pass and move on to become engineer. This video really broke it down. Fantastic, thanks for posting.
@wolfgange63 exactly ,..and why we are bout to switch up to HUE-mans,.. a step above human,so we can learn more in dpeth stuff,.. or just so we can ride around on beams of light or something snicker,..well ya never know i would like to go light surfing wouldn't you. :)
I don't mean to be rude. But what get's me is the statement that "since the electron has a very tiny mass, it can occupy a large region of space." doesn't seem to make sense. More mass occupies more space.
@DoeJonable Mass is the measurement of something's inertia, or how much it resists acceleration (A skinny person can be pushed more easily than a fat person). An electron has less MASS, which is correlated to it's inertia so it moves around the atom much faster thus "occupying" more space. Since protons have a much greater mass, they will move much less and occupy less space. The usage of occupy here means a particle will EXIST/be in a greater area. It does not mean it will take up more space.
Heisenberg’s principle says that the position and the momentum of an electron cannot be determined at the same time. The problem with this idea is that distance multiplied by momentum cannot result energy as in his dx*dp>=h/4pi equation. It's a blunder. In addition the momentum can be well determined when electrons hit an object or can be watched in cloud chambers. Electrons can behave like waves similar to water or air but to show one electron like fog is absurd. Bohr’s model cannot be saved.
@inverseight h doesn't have the dimension of an energy. It's an action, so energy * time with fits quite well to length * momentum. [J*s = kg*m^2/s^2 * s = kg*m^2/s = m * kg*m/s]
@TheAllboutwin You cannot know the velocity and position of an electron at the same time, since observing the position of the electron will cause it to stop. Its like a ball that continuously bounces around a room, and as soon as you observe it in any way, it freezes in space until you stop observing it.
@TheAllboutwin I will propose this: - If a particle has a given velocity, how can you measure position if the maximum accurate value of position approaches certainty, which is no velocity, which contradicts the Given. Conversely, if a particle has a given position, how can you measure velocity if the maximum accurate value of velocity approaches certainty, which is no position, which contradicts the Given.
If moving, position is indeterminate, if still, velocity is indeterminate.
I don't understand this at all. The other videos similar to this one I can grasp, but this is just downright confusing to me. Is there another video or website that could explain this better?
n=1 doesn't mean one electron otherwise is wouldn't be a hydrogen atom. n=2 means a different energy state, or for the Bohr model, a higher orbit for the electron. There are eight different energy states for each atom that electrons can occupy. So to picture it, for a hydrogen atom, your not adding electrons, your adding energy to reach a higher orbit that gives you the dumbbell shape. Make sense? (probably not) Read In Search of Shrodingers Cat if your interested. Great Introduction.
@Claypool185 hmm but I am still having trouble imagining dumbbell shaped atom. Perhaps I will munch through that book. I had that in my Goodreads list actually...its time to get it.
@jprg1966 I will win Nobel peace prize for nuking Izrael and Iran all together, but going back to atom, they had to come up with image of orbital shapes somehow. Obviously they did not take pictures. I guess they calculated them mathematicaly.How they came up with that.
Sorry, I am fairly new to that, and maybe I put my question wrong.
Did Bohr assume a world view in motion like a movie? Context' what is the point to defining reality other than mans vanity questioning what its all about' its not mathematics there is no moving picture of time' only the constant displacement to any and all forms of matter? you cannot see energy you can only see the physical effects' the question is how does energy maintain any power or where does any form of energy originate'
thumbs up sa tanan section EF kung ikanapulo na nmu nga balik2 ug tanaw, pwo wla lng japun kai nasabtan. . . . tsk2 ........ unsa na lng kha ang akong i-comment ani!.
Unification of Isolated science and GOD particle exist within Human body which is CERN Laboratory of Nature.for details see YOU TUBE VK SONAKIA and read article on all voices.com -certainty-tool-is-higgin-boson-or-god-particle-which-exist-in-human-body.We have already developed next generation easy to learn unified science.world scientist are welcome to see and test FIT-Future Imaging Tool technology
@crashpilot2 Read the Holy Bible it talks about things that men couldn't have possible known without the help of an all knowing God for example, it talks about the charateristics of the stars of the Orian, It mentions the characteristics of the Pleiades, and mentions the star Arcturus all in the book of Job. Form a scientific stand point the Bible will blow any book away.
I thank You Tube for the opportunity to see this, have it out there and share it with my daughter and, hopefully, some future physicists. Because, God knows, based upon these ignorant comments, we are lost. Physics, Calculus, Trigonometry....High School education,,,Hello? Sorry but it pisses me off that Who Can Dance viewers can vote on something they haven't even TRIED to understand,,,,Gee, it might just take some work?
@doerrthecricket It's because of what are called "boundary conditions" in physics. Basically, it's interactions with other particles dictates where it can exists and how probable it is to measure it in that region. So it's not just the mass (energy) content but where that mass is "free" to exist (be measured really). I know, it's abstract but makes incredibly accurate predictions. Nobody understands why.
Beyond that, the principle basically states that there are pairs of what are called conjugate properties. These are any two properties that when you multiply their units together you get energy multiplied by time. Momentum and position are two such conjugate properties. Since momentum depends equally on both mass and velocity when you have less mass you have less momentum so the uncertainty in momentum is lowered. In order for the inequality to remain true the uncertainty in position increases.
@doerrthecricket This is because the uncertainty in property one times the uncertainty in property two must be greater than or equal to a number (called h-bar which is a constant - always the same number). So if you become less uncertain about one property the other must become more uncertain. So sine we have a good idea of the energy and mass of an electron we have a good idea of it's momentum and, hence, don't really know "where it is" when we're know so much about it's mass and energy.
@doerrthecricket The HU principle arose completely mathematically and actually has to do with using wave forms in infinite sums to construct waves from other wave families (say making a square or maybe sawtooth wave from just sine and cosine summed infinitely and with different periods and amplitudes). It was Heisenberg who correctly applied this concept to QM because it's the exact same math. QM at this point is only understandable via mathematical abstraction. More answer than you wanted? =D
It's so amazing that when you look at the huge things in space; planets, stars, galaxies...they appear to work and take shapes similar to the subatomic particles they are made of.
@lattask8er Right, their is always similar patterns. Even with tornado's/hurricanes/galaxies and potentially entire universes. From the biggest our brain can't fathom to the smallest our eyes can't see. So what's up with all these god damn circles?! lmao
@ Best0fScience .I was reading about the uncertainty principle..and there was a problem in which it was calculated that if the uncertainty in position is about 10 to the power -8 then the uncertainty in the velocity was about 10 to the power +4 of a sub atomic particle like electron.I want to know what it means physically.Is it like the velocity could be any thing between 1 to 10 to the power +4 m/s? please clear my doubt. and please use a bit simpler approach.
this video was great. I was hypnotized and understood everything until the white light portion. Very nice 3d depiction of things. and no the voice isn't condescending...you pompous idiots...
this video was great. I was hypnotized and understood everything until the white light portion. Very nice 3d depiction of things. and no the voice isn't condescending...you insignificant people...
Could the difference between quantum and classical physics be because quantum physics represents the passage of time itself?
This theory is based on just two postulates,
1. The first is that the quantum wave particle function explained by Schrödinger’s wave equation represents the forward passage of time or Arrow of Time photon by photon.
2. The second is that Heisenberg’s Uncertainty Principle that is formed by the wave function is the same uncertainty we have with any future event.
@nickharvey7 it could something on those borders, infinite spectrums of realitys components, including time and space, and relation to quantum mechanics, may explain how everything indeed can happen at once without our attention to it because we are conditioned with our mind and leashed by our mental and sensual capacity to procede along with the wave we are surfing to, in this era and area of existence, to quickly summarize. it can all be found in more detail by comparing quantum and macro phys
@420dankykush Time has the geometry of Einstein’s curvature of spacetime explained in his theories of relativity. We also have time dilation round objects of great mass and when an object accelerates towards the speed of light. In this theory time is a continuous process of creation or change that forms the geometry of spacetime within an ever changing dynamic Universe.
4-20-2012 You got a job? Go on strike until they legalize cannabis! It's the only way to get full scale recreational legalization! Be the change! All you have to do is spread the word to everyone you know and every website you visit! Start a chainmail, get pro pot organizations involved. Blog about it. Like it. Thumbs up this message everywhere you see it! Let this message grow like a weed! We are the Marijuana Nation! On 4-20-2012 don't go to work instead toke up and protest! WE ARE DEFIANT!
@technowaves77 .... What he is saying is that because is very small the electron moves much faster and much more than the proton so by moving more and faster it occupies more space in the form of the cloud.
@cursedsword If we know the electrons momentum then we cant know the position and vica versa. You lose perspective of one or the other at these small atomic levels. Lets say we have a bumble bee with a blinkinglight atached to it in a dark room with a flower in the center. The bumblbee is the electron and the flower is the neutron. The blinking bumble bee will most likely be seen in the center of the room orbiting the flower but this doesnt mean it will aways be in the center.
@kidrymoe Sounds like it could be a good analogy but how you worded it did not make sense to me, so I am guessing you ran out of space to write it on youtube comments
@roadkill1001 Yes I ran out of space. The basic concept is that you can never now the exact position of an electron only the probability of finding an electron in a certain space. A bumble bee will probably stay close to a flower but it will not always be in the area of probability, just like an electron. We use heisenburgs uncertaintity principle in order to find this probability along with shrodingers wave equation to find a electrons position.
I really can't understand how people can get bored by this, it's amazing! I still can believe principles as these can exist. Very good job with the video :)
Ubuntu3011 3 days ago
This shit bores the fuck out of me. Go get some girlfriends nerds and stop worrying about things you will never understand.
picknicktooclick 5 days ago
@picknicktooclick: I worry about what you don't understand.
hartistry1957 4 days ago
@picknicktooclick Never understand this? Dude, I study this shit. I will be doing this 4 work later. I love learning about physics and im quite confident that I will get this down, so plz bother someone else.
btw, Im also a martial artist and have a girlfriend, so plz stfu bout that stuff...
zeldamage001 4 days ago
@picknicktooclick
Don't like? Then don't watch and most importantly, don't comment on it.
melis256 3 days ago
fucking uncanny valley
godzillaleas 5 days ago
HEISENBERG :3
myhoots 5 days ago
I wish i could get a hold of the music/ambience used in this video, so relaxing.
Nicolea9000 1 week ago
This has been flagged as spam show
THE [ SALEN-GA FLAT EARTH PARADOX ] OF QUANTUM PHYSICS- THE EARTH IS GLOBALLY ROUND TO AN ASTRONAUT AND IS LOCALLY FLAT TO A PEDESTRIAN. A MUCH MORE CLEARER PARADOX THAN SCHRODINGER'S DEAD/LIVE CAT. THE POWERFUL SALENGA PARADOX IS BASED ON HENRI POINCARE'S [ RELATIVITY OF SIMULTANEITY WHICH STATES: " A THING OR PHENOMENA IN NATURE, AND IT'S LOGICAL OPPOSITE ARE BOTH ANTI-LOGICALLY VALID AND TRUE, DEPENDENT UPON A PARTICIPATOR(PHYSICS OBSERVER)EXPERIENCING THE THING OR PHENOMENA".
CONDUIT99PERCENT 1 week ago
great vid!
bygota 1 week ago
mathemathics - Perfect Universal Language
quantum theory - best guess or representation of reality on the micro scale
Unenlightened individual - one who does not seek wisdom but believes he is all knowing
That last one is just for you dujl
jmtomes2001 1 week ago
@jmtomes2001
Just FYI, the uncertainty principle is not a fancy way of saying "I don't know".
It is more a way of saying "I know X is in this area somewhere, but it is impossible for me to pinpoint exactly where it is at any given point in time." With the added probability cloud we can of course tell where X is most of the time but with temporal uncertainty.
It is the simple act of observation which changes the data about the observed object, speed and location. You can't know both.
melis256 3 days ago
@melis256 The uncertainty principle gives no physical limitation on identifying the location of a particle. Only that the product of the uncertainty in position and momentum need be greater than some constant. So I can locate where the object is exactly, but its momentum would be completely uncertain.
ThoughtGaze 2 days ago
@ThoughtGaze
Or you can measure the momentum of the particle but wouldn't with certainty be able to know its next position.
Isn't that actually a little bit beautiful? :)
melis256 2 days ago
@melis256 FYI I understand what its saying but here is where you and everyone fail to see. it can not be predicted by using the uncertainty principle. That I can agree with. Why? Well once you except something as being impossible you are lost to that mentality. Your equations try to work around instead of solving! Nothing is impossible only the method by which you approach the problem does it become futile.
jmtomes2001 2 days ago
@jmtomes2001
Do you actually know how to measure something which does not emit anything in its neutral state? You throw something at it! Be it any kind of particle which can bounce back to your detector, this usually a photon. But oh, it changed the momentum/energy (and maybe even the heading) of the particle you measured because that is exactly what photons do when they interact.
Now you show me a way to measure without interaction.
melis256 1 day ago
@melis256 first off they are never at rest (neutral) this is your reference. As you can see here starts the problem. Your reference point is not a fixed point. even if you go with realitivity you might be fixed in reference to something else but it is not out of influence of the rest of the universe. Also all matter and photons are made of waves. which is standing (in reference to itself). But a wave of what? space itself over time and now your back over hundred years to idea of the Ether.
jmtomes2001 1 day ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@melis256 first off they are never at rest (neutral) this is your reference. As you can see here starts the problem. Your reference point is not a fixed point. even if you go with realitivity you might be fixed in reference to something else but it is not out of influence of the rest of the universe. Also all matter and photons are made of waves. which is standing (in reference to itself). But a wave of what? space itself over time and now your back over hundred years to idea of the Ether.
jmtomes2001 1 day ago
@melis256 I wish I did have the answers you seek but all of us are still shooting in the dark. There is the other problem. You can get close but here is something to help Warp things even more. Say you measure 1 amp of current in a wire. Well what about all the other electrons? You could have 10 amps flowing one direction and 9 amps in the other and never know it. Does it matter well if you only look at the ripple in the water then you missed the ocean and sky! And to the back to class I go.
jmtomes2001 1 day ago
finalmente una spiegazione facile!!
ombra306 1 week ago
This has been flagged as spam show
DOnt listen to this, its all theory, an atom has never even been seen, FACT.
Afewdollarsmore1 1 week ago
Watching the intro OVER AND OVER AGAIN. Okay i shall watch the content now.
surfthecentre 2 weeks ago
Leave off the sound effects and the music and you might have a pretty good instructional video.
If you must have sound effects and music, I suggest you make a cooking video.
drtom312 2 weeks ago
@drtom312 If you don't want effects read a book.
LegendLength 2 weeks ago 4
Looks like they used gmod to make the people animations lololol
rockoman100 2 weeks ago
Cool video but... The uncertainty principle in this video is off by a factor 2... On purpose for some reason?
TakesTwoToTango 3 weeks ago
WOW! awesome graphics. I helps a lot ! thanks
dahmer1552000 3 weeks ago
how fast do electrons move?
newgle 3 weeks ago
@newgle Lol, good one :p
TakesTwoToTango 3 weeks ago
This has been flagged as spam show
ส็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็ส็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็ส็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็ส็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็ส็็็็็็็็็็็ส็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็ส็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็ส็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็ส็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็ส็็็็็็็็็็็ส็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็ส็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็ส็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็ส็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็ส็็็็็็็็็็็ส็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็ส็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็ส็็็็็
PSNDaSingh 3 weeks ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Quantum theory was invented by insecure mathematicians as a tool for exerting their will over those who aren't big enough losers to spend thousands of hours learning insufferably boring and convoluted theories that are obviously false constructions intentionally meant to get revenge on people who spend their time having sex and rolling in meadows and fields, activities that they themselves are incapable of. Have you ever, like, SEEN a quantum entanglement, lol?
version191 3 weeks ago
his voice makes me feel like im floating on an electron cloud
holyhelo5speak 1 month ago
It is the simple fact that you can not know the position and the momentum of a partical simutaniously that teleportation will never be possible, using known physical and quantum boundaries. Knowing that tells me that just because it is not possible NOW does not mean it will be impossible forever.
RiaRadioFMHD773 1 month ago
@RiaRadioFMHD773 keep in fact that this is from 2008, oh yeah you just got pwned.
TeamIsOnMyBack 1 month ago
@TeamIsOnMyBack watch?v=-FqLCLooayM&feature=related
TeamIsOnMyBack 1 month ago
@TeamIsOnMyBack read below the video:
Uploaded by Best0fScience on Jan 23, 2010
Looks like 2 years ago yesterday, not 4 but I fail to see your point. Time is just another dimension (4th)
RiaRadioFMHD773 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@RiaRadioFMHD773 i sent you my link in another comment, lulz. the video i sent, watch?v=-FqLCLooayM&feature=related , is from 2008.
TeamIsOnMyBack 1 month ago
-:))
MagnaYu 1 month ago
lol... even the equation is wrong.
CalemBendell 1 month ago
hmm, looks like dark side of the moon to me.
Phaedron777 1 month ago
This really bohred me
DeathG4n 1 month ago
Seriously, how hard is it to pronounce TWO using one syllable?
frazzzer8888 1 month ago
This narrator should stick to voiceovers for meditative yoga DVDs.
He's killing the credibility of scientific exploration.
frazzzer8888 1 month ago
physics are so interesting
infectedsubincision 1 month ago
I just realized how counterintuitive this is. In our scale of everyday life large masses generally occupy large space. At the quantum level lagre masses occupy small space. This is the revere of our understanding that Large masses will occupy large spaces. This is of course because of differences in the probabilities of finding them in any particular space will increase as particles lose mass, but nevertheless more space for less mass is a very interesting paradox.
chenalos 1 month ago
Those who ask 4 help (others need not read). OK, Heisenberg's uncertainty principle states that "the speed (or momentum) and position of a particle at an instant cannot both be known exactly". The more precisely you measure one, the less less you can find out about the other. Heisenberg argued that the very act of observing a particle changes it, making precise knowledge impossible. "So neither the past more the future behavior of any subatomic particle can be predicted with certainty".
matt2beck 1 month ago
It is very "clear" to understand. But without a large background in science, it is still difficult to understand.
matt2beck 1 month ago
Seriously people, what the fuck does this all mean?!?! It really is meaningless.. So you can put tiny words on things that are way beyond our comprehension!!! It does not mean you understand it better!!! Even if I have 1000 words for this universe, I am no closer to understanding it than before. Its sort of pointless =P just a thought
BomaBoi 1 month ago
@BomaBoi pointless for people who dont understand it, i dont understand, it, but just because i dont it does not mean no one else does. you have to remember there will also be people who know more in a certain area then you, especally in an area that they have been working with for there whole life
messi996 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
How many Lies do you think you have told in your life? Have you ever stolen anything, even something small? Have you ever looked at a person with lust? Ever used GOD's name as a curse word? If so, GOD sees you as a Lying, thieving, blasphemous, adulterer at heart. The Guilty will end up in Hell. That's not GOD's will. You broke GOD's laws, but Jesus paid your fine! (IF) you Repent, and trust in Christ alone, GOD will forgive every sin you have ever committed, and grant you Eternal life!
EXALTEDDIRT 1 month ago
The Uncertainty Principle (mathematical way to state "I don't know")
If a scientist doesn't know the anwser they hide it in math. If only they could just say "I don't know" Why because then there wouldn't be 50 years wasted before someone else comes along and says this guy doesn't know what the hell he was talking about and here is the anwser!
jmtomes2001 1 month ago
@jmtomes2001 The Unicertainty Principle (what allows you to write stuff on the computer) and many many many many manyyyy other things.
lolnclol 1 month ago
@jmtomes2001 Obviously you don't know anything about the uncertainty principle.
dujl 1 week ago
@dujl Are you so certain I'm incorrect that you would stick to a path of belief that you have. Here is a tip for you math is representation of what we are trying to understand with a degree of accuratisy. So by using the uncertainty principle in equations you fail to understand the reason so many more questions arrise then answers and lets not forget its still a part of the quantum theory which in itself is speculation. Deal in facts not speculation.
jmtomes2001 1 week ago
@jmtomes2001 Spoken like a true ignoramous. Come back when you have an understanding of either mathemathics or quantum theory, but rather both.
dujl 1 week ago
Wow I understood NOTHING in this vid!!
ctsfinestjon 1 month ago
CERTAINLY, KEVIN.
frustumator 1 month ago 55
@frustumator ahahahahahha :D
dragovic90srb 2 weeks ago
Mr 47 teaches physics now?
andygaras 2 months ago
WTF?
MegaRoFLL 2 months ago
"Certainly, Kevin."
Really, why do they bother giving them names?
TuahShinguru 2 months ago
I used to be able to find a particles exact position....then I took an arrow to the knee.
dviator86 2 months ago
Comment removed
pommyrooter 1 month ago
@dviator86, Is your name Chuck Norris? I DIDN'T THINK SO XD
pommyrooter 1 month ago
wow, this is fantastic stuff. I never understood it doing A levels, but just got enought to pass and move on to become engineer. This video really broke it down. Fantastic, thanks for posting.
ofosusam 2 months ago
The guy in the purple shirt has mantits.
goldenweapon 2 months ago
Well put. Good job.
ASquared007 2 months ago
I love that humans know stuff.
elatus 2 months ago 46
@elatus, Yeah stuff is cool, so are things.
pommyrooter 1 month ago
@elatus Yea cause monkeys couldn't so we had to evolve! LOL... yea right!
wolfgange63 4 weeks ago
@wolfgange63 exactly ,..and why we are bout to switch up to HUE-mans,.. a step above human,so we can learn more in dpeth stuff,.. or just so we can ride around on beams of light or something snicker,..well ya never know i would like to go light surfing wouldn't you. :)
MrMentalflossed 3 weeks ago
I've been mind molested and mind fucked, but never mind raped.....
dj69918 2 months ago
Kevin has Digital Palsy.
hartistry1957 3 months ago
I don't mean to be rude. But what get's me is the statement that "since the electron has a very tiny mass, it can occupy a large region of space." doesn't seem to make sense. More mass occupies more space.
DoeJonable 3 months ago
@DoeJonable its more like it can move around more so the places where it could possibly be are greater.
TheLyreLiar 3 months ago
@DoeJonable Mass is the measurement of something's inertia, or how much it resists acceleration (A skinny person can be pushed more easily than a fat person). An electron has less MASS, which is correlated to it's inertia so it moves around the atom much faster thus "occupying" more space. Since protons have a much greater mass, they will move much less and occupy less space. The usage of occupy here means a particle will EXIST/be in a greater area. It does not mean it will take up more space.
Kelavmeister 2 months ago
@DoeJonable Why would more mass occupy more space? There is a thing called density.
himpllx 1 month ago
Why is Kevin talking to Lex Luthor about quantum mechanics?
nightthewolfhanyou 3 months ago
What is the song used in this clip?
ErebusGodOvDarkness 4 months ago
Heisenberg’s principle says that the position and the momentum of an electron cannot be determined at the same time. The problem with this idea is that distance multiplied by momentum cannot result energy as in his dx*dp>=h/4pi equation. It's a blunder. In addition the momentum can be well determined when electrons hit an object or can be watched in cloud chambers. Electrons can behave like waves similar to water or air but to show one electron like fog is absurd. Bohr’s model cannot be saved.
inverseight 4 months ago
@inverseight h doesn't have the dimension of an energy. It's an action, so energy * time with fits quite well to length * momentum. [J*s = kg*m^2/s^2 * s = kg*m^2/s = m * kg*m/s]
mrtompkins1 1 month ago
So this is why we see colors??
INMATE2468 4 months ago
@INMATE2468
Your brain allows you to see collors, the information reaching your eye is just wavelength
DeZorgenkindjes 3 months ago
I've seen like 30 different explanations for the Heisenburgh uncertainty principle, could anyone give me a concrete answer? Thanks.
TheAllboutwin 4 months ago
@TheAllboutwin You cannot know the velocity and position of an electron at the same time, since observing the position of the electron will cause it to stop. Its like a ball that continuously bounces around a room, and as soon as you observe it in any way, it freezes in space until you stop observing it.
Best explanation I can give.
DahPurpleHippo 4 months ago
@TheAllboutwin I will propose this: - If a particle has a given velocity, how can you measure position if the maximum accurate value of position approaches certainty, which is no velocity, which contradicts the Given. Conversely, if a particle has a given position, how can you measure velocity if the maximum accurate value of velocity approaches certainty, which is no position, which contradicts the Given.
If moving, position is indeterminate, if still, velocity is indeterminate.
flamencoprof 1 month ago
we all just need to smoke a blunt, that's all. everyone just drop what you're doing and find one.
l1nkie 4 months ago 2
@l1nkie I already did and still do not get it ! care to explain why ?!?
amcrabbit 4 months ago
I don't understand this at all. The other videos similar to this one I can grasp, but this is just downright confusing to me. Is there another video or website that could explain this better?
DerangedFox 4 months ago
Comment removed
TheZurgalicious 4 months ago
Comment removed
TheZurgalicious 4 months ago
This has nothing to do with Heisenberg uncertainty principle!!!!!
theyasin33 4 months ago 2
CERTAINLY KEVIN!
RebornMB 4 months ago 2
surely it'd be cheaper and less creepy to use real people for the vid?
MrJonnydubb 4 months ago 2
Question: Does the wave particle duality apply to all particles?
Is it OK to see the wave particle duality and the uncertainty principle as one ? I am having trouble grasping those 2
Tygrychu 4 months ago
It's really mind blowing!! I'm curious how did this come into existence???
shiza223 5 months ago
im not trying to brag or anything, but i can determine the position and momentum of a particle at the same time.
454ffv 5 months ago
Considering n=1 means 1 electron. How can a dumbbell shape be possible where nucleus is not in the center of electron's orbit?
I was (and am) like .."Huh?"
chan625 5 months ago
@chan625
n=1 doesn't mean one electron otherwise is wouldn't be a hydrogen atom. n=2 means a different energy state, or for the Bohr model, a higher orbit for the electron. There are eight different energy states for each atom that electrons can occupy. So to picture it, for a hydrogen atom, your not adding electrons, your adding energy to reach a higher orbit that gives you the dumbbell shape. Make sense? (probably not) Read In Search of Shrodingers Cat if your interested. Great Introduction.
Claypool185 5 months ago
@Claypool185 hmm but I am still having trouble imagining dumbbell shaped atom. Perhaps I will munch through that book. I had that in my Goodreads list actually...its time to get it.
Thanks for the reply :)
chan625 4 months ago
Do we know WHY electron cloud takes such strange shapes?
rycka1983 5 months ago
@rycka1983 You will probably win the Nobel prize if you can answer that one.
jprg1966 4 months ago
@jprg1966 I will win Nobel peace prize for nuking Izrael and Iran all together, but going back to atom, they had to come up with image of orbital shapes somehow. Obviously they did not take pictures. I guess they calculated them mathematicaly.How they came up with that.
Sorry, I am fairly new to that, and maybe I put my question wrong.
rycka1983 4 months ago
The talking people animations made me lol so fucking hard
bluetyee 5 months ago
freakin' awesome
chan625 5 months ago
This is just explaining something called spectroscopy....
chessdude3 5 months ago
the music is awesome? what genre would the music best fit into? not trance? or techno? maybe techno classical? haha someone help?
thatdamnbrownman 5 months ago
sa mga CHEM 51 AGC.. wa koy nasabtan,, hahay. HAHAHA
eulachster 5 months ago
Did Bohr assume a world view in motion like a movie? Context' what is the point to defining reality other than mans vanity questioning what its all about' its not mathematics there is no moving picture of time' only the constant displacement to any and all forms of matter? you cannot see energy you can only see the physical effects' the question is how does energy maintain any power or where does any form of energy originate'
AlbertEinsteinSr 5 months ago
thumbs up sa tanan section EF kung ikanapulo na nmu nga balik2 ug tanaw, pwo wla lng japun kai nasabtan. . . . tsk2 ........ unsa na lng kha ang akong i-comment ani!.
kimkim91492 5 months ago
ambot ani uie. . .
kimkim91492 5 months ago
A picture is worth a thousand words!
And
An animation is worth a couple of fat books!
Photon98 5 months ago 57
Is he saying "schrodinjer"? shrow-dinger? shrow-din-jer? Crazy Germans! Gotta love those sexy physicists.
aqouby 5 months ago
Unification of Isolated science and GOD particle exist within Human body which is CERN Laboratory of Nature.for details see YOU TUBE VK SONAKIA and read article on all voices.com -certainty-tool-is-higgin-boson-or-god-particle-which-exist-in-human-body.We have already developed next generation easy to learn unified science.world scientist are welcome to see and test FIT-Future Imaging Tool technology
vk sonakia
unified field scientist
bhopal
INDIA
vksonakia@yahoo.co.in
vksonakia 6 months ago
Chuck Norris is able to determine both a particle's precise position and momentum simultaneously.
p7byrd 6 months ago 145
@p7byrd
hahahahhahahhha awesome and true.
Xylok 5 months ago
@p7byrd That's derived from the Norris certainty principle.
rvyyn 1 month ago
@p7byrd Or simply state that chuck Norris can do everything that is humanly possible and impossible at any condition and at any time. lol
pwnear 1 month ago
@p7byrd no chuck norris IS EVERY PARTICLE
TheMannInTheShadows 1 month ago
Watch this video when high.
pianosidechat 6 months ago
@crashpilot2 I'm working on it. The problem is just like string and M theory testing it is much more difficult than just special relativity itself.
1965ace 6 months ago
@crashpilot2 watch my video popsicle masterpiece
RespectMyHate 6 months ago
I love being taught physics by Professor X!
SuperDayv 6 months ago
@crashpilot2 Read the Holy Bible it talks about things that men couldn't have possible known without the help of an all knowing God for example, it talks about the charateristics of the stars of the Orian, It mentions the characteristics of the Pleiades, and mentions the star Arcturus all in the book of Job. Form a scientific stand point the Bible will blow any book away.
RespectMyHate 6 months ago
can anyone tell me why would the electron be larger if its mass is low and proton smaller if its mass is higher ??
gogetassj495 6 months ago
I have a "broadband universe" theory that unites special relativity with string theory,
1965ace 6 months ago
Great video = instant sub. Thank you for popularizing science.
wkrepelin 6 months ago
I thank You Tube for the opportunity to see this, have it out there and share it with my daughter and, hopefully, some future physicists. Because, God knows, based upon these ignorant comments, we are lost. Physics, Calculus, Trigonometry....High School education,,,Hello? Sorry but it pisses me off that Who Can Dance viewers can vote on something they haven't even TRIED to understand,,,,Gee, it might just take some work?
spcam777 6 months ago 2
Those lips move like steel.
Hower98 6 months ago
How did I...get here?
AlexMitan 6 months ago
This would be better if G-man was narrating.
EMMETTXD 6 months ago
0:04 *looking up from reading the comments*
Yupp, I shit myself.
choppaholic26 6 months ago
Why is it that the electron with a small mass takes more room than a proton with "big" mass?
doerrthecricket 7 months ago
@doerrthecricket It's because of what are called "boundary conditions" in physics. Basically, it's interactions with other particles dictates where it can exists and how probable it is to measure it in that region. So it's not just the mass (energy) content but where that mass is "free" to exist (be measured really). I know, it's abstract but makes incredibly accurate predictions. Nobody understands why.
wkrepelin 6 months ago
Beyond that, the principle basically states that there are pairs of what are called conjugate properties. These are any two properties that when you multiply their units together you get energy multiplied by time. Momentum and position are two such conjugate properties. Since momentum depends equally on both mass and velocity when you have less mass you have less momentum so the uncertainty in momentum is lowered. In order for the inequality to remain true the uncertainty in position increases.
wkrepelin 6 months ago
@doerrthecricket This is because the uncertainty in property one times the uncertainty in property two must be greater than or equal to a number (called h-bar which is a constant - always the same number). So if you become less uncertain about one property the other must become more uncertain. So sine we have a good idea of the energy and mass of an electron we have a good idea of it's momentum and, hence, don't really know "where it is" when we're know so much about it's mass and energy.
wkrepelin 6 months ago
@doerrthecricket The HU principle arose completely mathematically and actually has to do with using wave forms in infinite sums to construct waves from other wave families (say making a square or maybe sawtooth wave from just sine and cosine summed infinitely and with different periods and amplitudes). It was Heisenberg who correctly applied this concept to QM because it's the exact same math. QM at this point is only understandable via mathematical abstraction. More answer than you wanted? =D
wkrepelin 6 months ago
I wonder if the shapes have to do with frequencies? The more energy, the higher the frequency, the higher the shell?
816bigbear 7 months ago
man those characters are creeeeeepy. "Cer-tain-ly Ke-VIN!" lol
thesmallsketch 7 months ago
Hmm... I remember these from High School Chemistry.
OnixFilms 7 months ago
It's so amazing that when you look at the huge things in space; planets, stars, galaxies...they appear to work and take shapes similar to the subatomic particles they are made of.
lattask8er 7 months ago
@lattask8er Right, their is always similar patterns. Even with tornado's/hurricanes/galaxies and potentially entire universes. From the biggest our brain can't fathom to the smallest our eyes can't see. So what's up with all these god damn circles?! lmao
lightitupfool 7 months ago
HOW IN THE FUCK CAN THEY KNOW THESE THINGS!?! At best this is a abstract representation of the real thing.
Imphipis 7 months ago
@Imphipis equationss define all that, they haven't seen it. They calculate through equations all that.
strawberry5999 7 months ago
hey .please clear my doubt.....
veena20101 8 months ago
nothing bout uncertainty principle??
shnk75 8 months ago
To all the chemists out there: its true that the shapes of all the orbitals are derived from quantum mechanics
kurtilein3 8 months ago
i can see That quantum mechanics is full of ciRcular reasOning. light absorbed here matches Light emmited there... its a falLacy.
nobrainQQ 8 months ago
@ Best0fScience .I was reading about the uncertainty principle..and there was a problem in which it was calculated that if the uncertainty in position is about 10 to the power -8 then the uncertainty in the velocity was about 10 to the power +4 of a sub atomic particle like electron.I want to know what it means physically.Is it like the velocity could be any thing between 1 to 10 to the power +4 m/s? please clear my doubt. and please use a bit simpler approach.
veena20101 8 months ago
God is real. He created these things
RespectMyHate 8 months ago
@RespectMyHate prove it :D
ettore666 8 months ago
@ettore666 You already have it, just look around, this place was designed by a mastermind, its not that hard to see.
RespectMyHate 8 months ago
@RespectMyHate Thats not a prove, prove me with facts not with your view of the world or the universe.
In terms of religions and filosophys the Tao is much more real then any god.
ettore666 8 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
I BELIEVE ALL OF THIS TIES IN WITH THE NEHME THEOREM
aznpeetah 8 months ago
this video was great. I was hypnotized and understood everything until the white light portion. Very nice 3d depiction of things. and no the voice isn't condescending...you pompous idiots...
blimp656 8 months ago
this video was great. I was hypnotized and understood everything until the white light portion. Very nice 3d depiction of things. and no the voice isn't condescending...you insignificant people...
blimp656 8 months ago
Mmm, Thumbs up if you paused this video at least once because you didn't quite understand a few things.. :)
TookMe20min2findThis 8 months ago 24
@TookMe20min2findThis
i think pausing the video whenever you need to think is a VERY GOOD idea!
kurtilein3 8 months ago
Could the difference between quantum and classical physics be because quantum physics represents the passage of time itself?
This theory is based on just two postulates,
1. The first is that the quantum wave particle function explained by Schrödinger’s wave equation represents the forward passage of time or Arrow of Time photon by photon.
2. The second is that Heisenberg’s Uncertainty Principle that is formed by the wave function is the same uncertainty we have with any future event.
nickharvey7 8 months ago
@nickharvey7 it could something on those borders, infinite spectrums of realitys components, including time and space, and relation to quantum mechanics, may explain how everything indeed can happen at once without our attention to it because we are conditioned with our mind and leashed by our mental and sensual capacity to procede along with the wave we are surfing to, in this era and area of existence, to quickly summarize. it can all be found in more detail by comparing quantum and macro phys
420dankykush 8 months ago
@420dankykush Time has the geometry of Einstein’s curvature of spacetime explained in his theories of relativity. We also have time dilation round objects of great mass and when an object accelerates towards the speed of light. In this theory time is a continuous process of creation or change that forms the geometry of spacetime within an ever changing dynamic Universe.
nickharvey7 8 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
4-20-2012 You got a job? Go on strike until they legalize cannabis! It's the only way to get full scale recreational legalization! Be the change! All you have to do is spread the word to everyone you know and every website you visit! Start a chainmail, get pro pot organizations involved. Blog about it. Like it. Thumbs up this message everywhere you see it! Let this message grow like a weed! We are the Marijuana Nation! On 4-20-2012 don't go to work instead toke up and protest! WE ARE DEFIANT!
!
WiiLink89 8 months ago
did david lynch make this video?
jorgepeterbarton 9 months ago
His voice is so condescending...
ArtistryofDebauchery 9 months ago
@technowaves77 .... What he is saying is that because is very small the electron moves much faster and much more than the proton so by moving more and faster it occupies more space in the form of the cloud.
beni2500 10 months ago
Soo the current model of electron clouds is made based on the uncertainty principle because we don't know the electron's momentum?
cursedsword 10 months ago
@cursedsword If we know the electrons momentum then we cant know the position and vica versa. You lose perspective of one or the other at these small atomic levels. Lets say we have a bumble bee with a blinkinglight atached to it in a dark room with a flower in the center. The bumblbee is the electron and the flower is the neutron. The blinking bumble bee will most likely be seen in the center of the room orbiting the flower but this doesnt mean it will aways be in the center.
kidrymoe 10 months ago
@kidrymoe Sounds like it could be a good analogy but how you worded it did not make sense to me, so I am guessing you ran out of space to write it on youtube comments
roadkill1001 10 months ago
@roadkill1001 Yes I ran out of space. The basic concept is that you can never now the exact position of an electron only the probability of finding an electron in a certain space. A bumble bee will probably stay close to a flower but it will not always be in the area of probability, just like an electron. We use heisenburgs uncertaintity principle in order to find this probability along with shrodingers wave equation to find a electrons position.
kidrymoe 10 months ago