Funny, there were questions about both candidates eligibility, but only one was heard in court, the wrong one. Am I seeing a case of discrimination here? Both issues were the same, but only the white guy has to prove he's eligible?
Gisybel is clarity353 and about 100 other youtube accounts she cancelled when people blocked her for harassment. Seems she has no life and comes here 24/7 to bash anyone who stands up for the Constitution. She's a communist and a schizo. Be forewarned.
Prove Obama ever said he was a "natural born citizen" on fight the smears? Notice he didn't? Wonder why huh? Cuz he knows he's not. Clever use of words, but he and YOU haven't fooled anyone. This will continue to be in the courts. The bailout is now in the courts for the second time. First by Bloomberg. Now the second patriot act is up, only by Obama and people are starting to see he's nothing but another Bush. He has a Clinton payback team to keep Bill from talking like he threatened to do.
Let's see what else. All the troops from Iraq, that Bambi didn't want in this war, are now just going to be redirected to Pakistan and increased. He's going to police America, take away all your gun or at least the ammo to shoot them with, starting with the gun dealers, your ass is going to be drafted this year. Enjoy your president. He's not mine. I don't intend to do a damn thing he says. I'm on vacation for the next 4 years. You can go be his slave. He's bleeding your money already. Have fun
Hey Pete, did you bother reading the court opinons in cases they deny. Sometimes it takes until mid-year before they come out. Go do some homework because you obviously did none. Natural born citizen was clear enough for John Bingham, Pete. How come you don't know? It was clear enough for those who relied on Vattel Law of Nations that the Supreme Court accepts as a legal reference, too. Seems you don't know much about that either. You need a history lesson and an education. I know more than you!
Yes, Vattel is cited by the SC often, but Lynch v Clarke and Wong Kim Ark both speak pretty directly on what constitutes a natural born citizen, and both say that your interpretation is incorrect. They are both still valid caselaw and would be precedent for any future case on this.
And it's pretty rare for the SC to issue any opinion at all when they deny cert, so I wouldn't hold my breath for any opinion from them in Donofrio or any other NBC case.
I hate to tell you this, but one look at Lynch v. Clarke and I see nothing but a bunch of cases after that that disagreed with that judge. They said that the judge in Lynch was making up law, not interpreting it. He said that's not judicial, it's legislative. Lynch judge decided that he didn't want a bunch of "alien generations" running around so that's why he decided what he did. What the hell kind of bs is that for a judge? Truth is, I can name 50 cases that disagree with you too.
I'm really not sure where you're getting that from. The Lynch decision is still good law, was cited positively in Wong Kim Ark, and has been used in treatises about citizenship this year.
The specificity of your language makes it seem like you haven't made this up, but I'm not sure where you're coming from here.
But please, name me 50 cases that disagree with this interpretation of natural born citizen.
And citizenship was defined by the 14th Amendment; anybody born in the US is a citizen.
yeah i'm gonna do that in a little box like this. don't be stupid and go look it up yourself and don't say you did, because that idiotic explanation of 14th amend just proved you're a moron. read it again, subject to THIS jurisdiction and no other. that don't include dual citizens bud.
"All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States" And no other? That appears nowhere within the amendment. Maybe you should reread the 14th amendment if you think it said "and no other."
Further, this was interpreted in Wong Kim Ark to include people born within the US to alien parents to be citizens at birth.
Again, you could provide specific language, or a source. I've found nothing. You could also send a PM.
And you think Wong is constitutional, eh? It's not. I could prove that and I can't even vote yet. That interpretation makes Wong a dual citizen, one of china and one of the U.S. The framers disallowed double allegiances. If that point went to court, you realize what would happen, right? Right?
Yes, Wong certainly is. Courts are bound to follow it on the basis of stare decisis unless they feel it's clearly wrong. Given that it's been positively cited hundreds of times since and that it's become a major bedrock of our interpretation of what it means to be an American citizen, I doubt it's getting overturned any time soon.
Again, citizenship got defined by the 14th Amendment, as interpreted by the SC - if you're born on American soil, you're an American from birth.
Again, this country doesn't recognize dual citizens as eligble for the presidency. Quote me where that statue took effect because I'd like to read it. Far as I know, the framers used patrus sequitur patrem for freemen. Patrus sequitur ventrem applied to property only. THAT was the common law understood by the law of nations. The condition is, you follow the nationality of your father, not your mother. I don't where you got that being born here makes you eligible to run for POTUS, it doesn't.
Obama's dual citizenship expired automatically at his 21st birthday.
Being born in the US makes you eligible for the presidency. This is really not a controversial idea. See Jill Prior on the Natural Born Citizenship Clause, 97 Yale L.J. 881 (1988).
Again, name a single current legal scholar who believes there's a difference between a native-born citizen and a natural born citizen. Just like you could name 50 cases that disagree with Lynch v. Clarke.
I think you need to study more and go back in history a lot more than you come off as being learned at. You simply don't know what you're talking about. Try reading a history book. Being born here doesn't make you a citizen, even per the 14th amend. Maybe you should go read the entire line next time.
Under the 14th, unless you are a member of an invading military, a child of a foreign diplomat (or maybe an illegal immigrant) if you are born in the US, you're an American citizen from birth. You're the one who's putting forth a seriously extreme interpretation of the constitution. You're going to have to provide some support for your position.
You're an idiot, the 14th says "subject to the jurisdiction thereof" when they asked what it meant, they said, "Owing no other allegiance to anyone else, THAT is what it means!" direct quote by the way. Nice try, but I do my homework. You can't fool me. You can pull the wool over some other dummy's head, but I'm not you're average stupid kid. In fact, none of us are as stupid as you think we are and we're going to be in power soon, over YOU.
You may do your homework, but if this is as obvious as an idea as you believe it to be, cite a single current legal scholar who agrees with you. I'll go ahead and bet you didn't even look at the article I cited earlier.
Wong Kim Ark is binding SC precedent and holds that anybody born within the US (with exceptions I mentioned) are American citizens from birth. This was questioned and defined by the Supreme Court, and while you may think they decided wrong, it's been done for over a century.
If you had any idea how many flip-flopping precedents there were on this subject, you wouldn't have made that statement. Ark specifically said they weren't even ruling on NBC, they said he was a citizen only. The Lynch case made up still another "class" of citizens out of thin air. You may love your Obamaboy, but try taking off the blinders next time and see it for what it is, LIES. The framers said no foreign influence, period. You can't change the Const. without an amendment so don't try it.
That's why these justices say, "oh i'm not talking about POTUS, i'm just making another class of citizens" which they had no right to do anyway. Because they know damn well they can't without an amendment and certainly not about some Wong kid who wasn't even running for POTUS. Then years later it's YOU people who decide it applies to POTUS candidates. We still have a POTUS clause and you didn't prove the framers included dual citizens in that clause, because you can't. It doesn't EXIST.
qwerty has this impression that if you just dump a kid here as a foreigner and take him off to foreign lands, it's ok to come back and have the kid run for POTUS. God, I'd love to be a fly on the wall if one of the framers came back and saw this mangling of their constitution. They'd probably hang people like you. I know they didn't mean that and why? Because I read their books, you obviously aren't literate enough nor care to see what they had to say about it. They wrote it, not you.
All this shit is, is a backdoor'ing of the constitution little by little by all you communists until you wake up one day and there all you are, thinking we're all stupid and telling everyone that every foreigner or half-breed can run for POTUS. It's a lie. They couldn't change the constitution so they whittled it down with BS decisions and legislations to get around it. It's obvious. It's blatant. It's disgusting and treason. You're out to kill off this country and more and more people know it.
if there's a subsequent case which overturns Wong Kim Ark, cite it! If there is a current scholar who agrees with you, cite it! If a Framer wrote a book defining NBC, CITE IT!
You can make assertions all you want, but they don't make them true in any way, shape or form.
So long as that person dumped here is natural born, 35 years old and has spent 14 years in the US, then yes, that person can run for POTUS!
The Writings of George Washington, Alexander Hamilton, James Madison, the rest of the Founders, IDIOT! Go READ it! You're a dumbass! Ark NEVER said he was a "natural born citizen". In fact, the Judge dissenting said children follow the condition of their FATHER and has ALWAYS been the way. That IS the way the Founders said it and any judge is going to have to go BACK in history when they decide NBC and then YOU are going to LOSE, faggot.
The fact that you are citing the dissent as support shows how little you understand how the law works. The dissent forms no part of law and is not binding on anyone.
You are right in that the SC did not explicitly define Ark as NBC, but there is LOTS of dicta in the opinion to suggest they would if that was the question they had to answer.
Again, name just one case that overruled Ark or Lynch v. Clarke. You said you could name 50, I only want you to name one.
The dissent proves that was the common law and even the civil law going back to the signing of the Constitution and before even that! This judge just decided to make up his own and you know what that means? He can be discarded. Not only that, but he never decided what an NBC was. The dissent hints to that! So where does that put your boy Obama? In the fucking dual citizen (foreign influence) category where he belongs and when THAT comes out, there's gonna be hell to pay.
Pro-tip: you cannot simply discard a Supreme Court majority opinion because you believe it to be incorrectly decided.
Pro-tip: when making a legal argument, try to avoid citing dissents. They're dissents because a majority of the Supreme Court disagrees with that opinion.
However, I'll ask for a fourth time: name a single SC decision that overturns Wong, or a single current legal scholar who agrees with your position.
Oh yes I can esp. when Ark specifically SAID they weren't deciding who was a natural born citizen. That Judge KNEW he was trying to cross the line because all the legal precedents before him disagreed and so did the dissenting opinion. Guess what? You can't use Ark to make Obama eligible for POTUS because the SCOTUS even admitted they weren't deciding that. So go cry more. It ain't gonna fly but the rest of the cases that prove what the framers meant and the writings of the framers will.
Pro-tip: When trying to defend your marxist buddy, try not to use law that admitted it had nothing to do with the presidency. you're not taking over this country. it's going back to the way it was intended to be. You will be the minority around here. You abort all your kids anyway. The new generation is brought up right and will make things right. I'll put ppl like you on a boat and cast it out to sea if you keep running your mouth.
It wasn't a majority opinion asshole and get it through your fucking thick head - IT HAS NOTHING TO DO WITH THE PRESIDENCY and the new precedent is coming soon. Before Obama thinks he can take over the SCOTUS too.
HUNDREDS I said, that's right.. HUNDREDS! Go read United States Supreme Court Reports By United States. Supreme Court, Lawyers Co-operative Publishing Company
Go fuck yourself jerkoff. I'm done with your communist crap. You're gonna find out how it's gonna be around here and it won't be your way. That's a fact. You're not in charge here. This generation will be. You're going down and I'll probably run for President one of these days and call out people like you and remind everyone what the framers warned about- people like you. You're an asshole and a scumbag. Go fuck yourself.
The doctrine you keep citing of citizenship coming from one's father has not been invoked in ANY case since the dissent of Wong. The reason for that is the majority (yes, 6 out of 9 is a majority!) held that anybody born on American soil is an American from birth, with limited exceptions.
You argue that there's a distinction between native born citizen and NBC, but cite absolutely no support, either because you're too stupid to look it up, or actually have and realize that there is none.
I'm a scumbag because I asked you to name a single case that agrees with your position, and instead you referred me to the 540+ volume SC Reports.
If you read carefully (something you seem incapable of) you'll see that I haven't expressed support or opposition to Obama. All I've done is dispute your legal argument, that there is a difference between a native born citizen and a natural born citizen. No serious scholar agrees with your position, no court decision agrees with your decision.
"Children, born in England, of such aliens, were therefore natural-born subjects." Wong, 169 U.S. 655. The opinion discusses English common law and concludes that children born of aliens were natural born subjects. He doesn't outright declare the same to be the case here, but it's really strong evidence.
It's like banging my head against a wall, because I know you never will name a single case that overrules Wong or cite a scholar that supports this position.
@qwertyman129 "The Supreme Court has never explicitly ruled on whether children born in the United States to illegal immigrant parents are entitled to birthright citizenship via the 14th Amendment,although it has generally been assumed that they are. A birth certificate (a.k.a Certificate of Live Birth for children born in certain states) issued by a U.S. state or territorial government is evidence of citizenship, ..." United States v. Wong Kim Ark, 169 U.S. 649 (1898)
patrus sequitur patrem, faggot. Go look it up. It was the common law at the signing of the constitution and that is going to reflect what an NBC is because I read those history books and that is what they said. You're a commie jerkoff and this next generation is gonna have severe penalities for you jackasses. You THINK you're getting away with this tax and crap bill that just went through the house. Just you wait. We're changing this country BACK to the way it was meant to be and you LOSE.
The Federalist Papers don't define natural born citizen, nor does the Constitution. If you have read this to be clear in so many history books, name one, just one book that supports you! A single one! It shouldn't be that hard!
Yes, Partus sequitur patrem, a lovely piece of sexist common law. If your father isn't a citizen, you aren't a citizen. Often switched to ventrem to make slavery easier to sustain. Last time it appears in an American case is the dissent of Wong. Well done.
The fucking Constitution doesn't define what a citizen is either jerkoff. It doesn't define what a arms are either, but you guys sure as hell want to put limits on those while giving yourselves blanket access to stuff the framers NEVER intended. Read the fucking history dickwad and you won't come off as so pathetically ignorant. This shit stops NOW. You're not getting away with what you're doing. The whole fucking thing is going to come out and Obama and your ilk will probably go to jail.
That sexist law, as you call it, was the law and the adopted by the framers. Women couldn't vote or own property, so there. Goes back to the Roman Empire, go blame them jackass. Shows what you don't know. The legal precedent backs up that position of the framers and that's the only thing that matters, what they meant by NBC and that little latin clause is going to put your boy back in Kenya where he belongs. He's no American and neither are YOU.
You follow the nationality of your FATHER, not your mother and there's NO precedent that says otherwise regarding who is eligible to the presidency. show me one and don't point to the 14th amend., that says SUBJECT TO THE JURISDICTION THEREOF and Obama ADMITS he was subject to Great Britain. Case closed, he can't be President!
There's hundreds of precedent during the time the framers were alive and beyond that backup the FACT that the common law was that you followed the condition of the father concerning nationality. Every case follows the ancestry when deciding nationality and it depended on the father. The writings of the framers acknowledge it and cite it, including Vattel who wrote a book on Internat'l Law which the courts used and cited also as a backup to their Const, proving that was exactly what they meant.
Hundreds of precedents you say? NAME ONE! You keep upping the number. First you said there were 50 cases that proved me wrong, now you say there are hundreds. All I'm asking for is one case that says that Wong is overturned and that we're back to this standard that maybe never even existed of a NBC being the child of two American citizens.
1. Name a single case that overturns Wong.
2. Name a single current legal scholar that believes that a native born citizen is not a natural born citizen
Pete william has lost all credibility with that stunt he pulled on the Donofrio case. He's not fooling anyone and neither his this video. You guys lied and you got caught. You fail.
"My teacher"(a lawyer) told me that Natural born citizen is being born in U.S Natural, "natura" is Latin for birth. "Natural born citizen" is not defined in the Constitution. Obama is a Natural born citizen, because he was born in Hawaii and his mom was American. His UK citizenship was given to him as a baby and that will not compromise loyalty to U.S. Obama is qualified to be President and there is nothing you and the other clowns can do. All lawsuits have been DISMISSED, OK??
You clearly do not understand the role of the Supreme Court. The court UPHELD the constitution here with judicial restraint. They had good reason to deny this case under the political question doctrine also not to mention this guy had no standing. Submitting your birth certificate to the correct parties has nothing to do with showing it to the SC or showing it on TV or mailing you a personal copy! Even if he did all of that there would still be idiots out there that don't believe it.
the courts cannot intervene before there is a crime..
when obama takes office willfully and knowingly that his father was not of this country- only then will he be arrested and charged with a crime.. the law is the law- nobody can beat the law.. 051
Did you hear this report? DISMISSED! as per US Constitution 14th Amendment Article IV, Section 1, Clause 1, makes Obama a natural born citizen by birth. Barack Obama's participation in his British citizenship was non-existent, to the extent that does not compromise loyalty to the US. Citizenship is NOT based on parentage but on where someone is born and he was born in Hawaii. Case Closed. End of Conspiracy theories, get the facts no more lies.
You're a liar, too. Everyone knows all your alts, clarity, gisybel and all the others you were blocked using so you cancel them everytime you are blocked. You're not fooling anyone. You just created that account yesterday. Do you think we're stupid? Everyone and I mean EVERYONE is onto you.
You're so stupid it's not even funny. The 14th amendment was CHANGED from "natural born citizen" to "citizen". Gee, I wonder why? Could it be because they knew the difference and you don't? You're such a freakin idiot, clarity. No one likes you. Everyone hates you as a matter of fact. You have no life. You get blocked everyone you go. You constantly make new accounts to spread your lies around. Just die already.
You just hate Obama and you and all obamanots are ignorants, Dont' bother me anymore with your frustration. HE WON, move out of town or kill yourself!
I hate people like you. You're hypocrites. You dems were the ones crying over McCain in 2000 and then again in 2008 for the same damn reason. Now it's get off my back because it's your man? Get the hell away from me you hypocrite.
And everyone knows you're clarity, Gisybel. Making another account now again? How many do you need to agree with yourself? See a shrink and then jump off a cliff.
You are paranoic and immature I don't have to jump off a cliff because I am happy obama won and I am going to the Inauguration dumb. And let me tell you I never liked McCain he is an old fart idiot and I was always democrat.
You're an idiot. I hope you lose every dime and no social security or job. I hope you rely on your precious bambi for your every need and get drafted. It's already in the news today that as soon as the bailout goes through, you're going, male or female. Get hopping, boy. Do your homage to Mr. kenyan.
How stupid of you believing he is Kenyan all of you obamanots that is the only thing you do blah blah, why don't you prove it? Go ahead prove his Kenyan bc. That is why all the lawsuits have been dismissed, because you and all those lawyers are just clowns with no proof, hahaha. The judges are wipping their butts with these lawsuits lol!
His father is Kenyan. Obama admits his birth dual loyalties. He claims he's a "native born citizen" but only has a certification of live birth that Hawaii hands out to everyone, including people NOT born in this country. ALL FACT, straight from Hawaii Vital Statistics and Obama's own mouth. No further proof required. Native born is not natural born. He's not eligible. Neither was McCain. Neither was Calero who was thrown off the ballot by 5 other secretaries of state for the same reason.
Ok then we are going to have a British president, how cool! I don't want to discuss this with a very ignorant person.
Watch this: Is Obama a natural born American citizen? by southsidetokyo, here in Youtube you'll see why all the lawsuits are going to be dumped. I don't need your response and read my lips: He is not going to be removed from Office. Case Closed
Wrong! YOU are going to have a usurper who is pretending to be president. He's not MY president. You elected the idiot. I'm not taking any orders. You go do it!
No, see? I am pretty sure if he shows his long bc all of will say is fake too. Watch the video and see for yourself the proof,it is a TV report on Obama's citizenship. And the opinion of the Supreme Court.
Wanna bet stupid? This is a free country. I'll do what I want. I'm be on medical leave for the next 4 years? What are you going to do? Argue with my doctor? Back injury, sorry. No can do anything you say. Oh and you can pay for it too. HAHHAHAHAHAHA
the communists are still trying to divert attention to the BC issue.. they know obama is not natural born because he told everyone his father was not of this country.. obama will be impeached- there's no way around that..
He'll be removed one way or the other, either as the worst usurper in history in 4 years or in handcuffs when the truth comes out, and it will. The truth came out about Chester Arthur and the truth will come out about Obama. Just like the truth already came out about you Gisybel/clarity, etc., etc.schizo
Cant beleive you americans are allowing this illegal action. The media cares more about pointless stupid matters like palins wardrobe and terrorists but no one knows obamas true identity?.Why are you Amercans taking their lies sitting down? Your government has flaunted your constitution and allowed this non american citizen to become YOUR president and your taking it up the yazoo like little girls.
If you Americans let this illegal action slip by YOU are to blame and feel sorry for your country
Neither of your parents have to be americans for you to be eligible to be president of the united states. BUT you HAVE to be born on american soil. No matter your past ancestery, all you have to do is be born on American Soil.
And Obama was most certainly born in Kenya Africa. On African soil, not American soil.
No. no where in the constitution does it say both parents have to be US citizens. It says you must be A Natural Born Citizen. And one can not be a "Natural Born Citizen" if you were born in Kenya and are a citizen of Indonesia.
obama cannot be an american president because he will naturally be loyal to his mothers country and loyal to his fathers country.. this is against the constitution. go to RallyCongress[dot]com. 051
Age and Citizenship requirements - US Constitution, Article II, Section 1
No person except a natural born citizen, or a citizen of the United States, at the time of the adoption of this Constitution, shall be eligible to the office of President; neither shall any person be eligible to that office who shall not have attained to the age of thirty-five years, and been fourteen years a resident within the United States.
UNCONSTITUTIONAL because by nature you will be loyal to your father's country AND to your mother's country.. spread the word fast because it's the JOB of congress to uphold the constitution when swearing in a new president.. 005
There is a million dollar reward for anyone who can produce the birth certificate. Why doesn't obama produce the certificate and give the money to charity? Seems pretty selfish and evil if he doesn't.
Germany is no where near democratic. A girl in my class just came here from there because her parents want her to have a chance at college. In Germany you go to school for 13 years,then are forced into serving the governemnt for a year, then only a select few get to go to college, in Germany you MUST take care of your parents - it is part of their constitution..nursing homes are only for the people whose kids have died. Germans' freedoms aren't at all like our freedoms.
Also, in Germany kids have to be really good at their extracurricular activites. A school bands came here to talk to us, they are much better at music than we are, but that's because only 3 kids in the whole orchestra play sports (this was 8th grade)the school (government) wants you excel at one thing so you don't try everything like you do here
Yeah, I had a friend in the Navy who grew up in Germany. I do think there's still something to be said for a rounded, liberal arts education but it's interesting.
I certainly wouldn't make fun of Germany today. It's doing a lot of things well.
Do you ever think that if Hilary/McCain were real oponents of Obama why they didn't investigate his citizenship? Obama was put in by the Shadow Govt/Bankers
Or maybe they did investigate his citizenship and found out that he was born in Hawaii. Did you know that Hillary Clinton REALLY wanted to be president? She didn't bring it up. Nor McCain, nor Fox News. Nor the FBI. Not the CIA. You think he wasn't vetted by any of them. Face reality. McCain lost. Obama won.
Why don't Obama just show his Birth Certificate? I mean he is President and the people have the Right to see it. I could care less who Won out of that bunch, they are all Puppets of the Real Master's
The point is that he doesn't HAVE to produce anything until compelled to by a court. He is allowing his enemies to reveal themselves, spend their time and money on something that the FBI is required, by law, to investigate BEFORE he can recieve federal funding, secret service protection or any other public benefits....this does not include security clearances he holds from being a Senator.
WHAT EVER. you see my friend, there is a problem with your second sentence. Barack Obama does not have to show mr. Berg his birth certificate. that is HIS Right. dont you all think there is a reason why every court this goes to throws it out. because it is nonsense, if there was any relevence to this, both clinton and mccain would have brought it up
This is not the Berg case, this is the Donofrio case - there are 14 such cases across the country right now.He has to show it to the states' attorney generals where he was on the ballot, but the states where the law applied did not due their due dilegence.
They have rejected ALL of the cases. They are not going to interfere after all the flack they got in 2000 for picking Bush. And there is no reason to. These people are trying to prove that Obama is not American enough to be President. That is the real motive behind these frivalous lawsuits.
melora72, not only have they not "rejected ALL of the cases," but the stronger Wrotnowski's in conference this Friday. And yes, we are trying to uphold Constitution's provision for Presidential loyalty to America. I'm not sure this CNN guy is correct when he says it's being argued that *both* parents had to be citizens of the US. My understanding is it's ok if one parent has foreign citizenship if it is not transfered to child at birth, which is what happened in BO's case with UK law.
It only takes one senator and one congressman to request a stay of election until Obama shows proof. If they don't stand up before Jan 20 it's all over for America. God's gable is gonna fall. And there will be no going back cause Obama will put in at least four liberal supreme court justices. This will shape America four next 40 years. McCain was our last hope to overturn abortion, gay marriage and the policy of pushing Israel in giving away land for peace.
1st off, the supreme court justices are posted for life, so until one either retires, dies, falls extremely ill, or is forces to resign do to bad behavior, Obama cannot replace them.
2nd, EVERY president fills the open post with whoever they want,usually one from his own party.
3, It should be obvious that Obama is standing by his word and filling positions with both liberals and republicans
lastly Mccain was YOUR last hope because the American the Majority, Voted for Obama
Wow. Sad day for all Americans. If Obama had one bit of integrity and he had nothing to hide, he would RUN to the SCOTUS and hand deliver a certified copy of his long form COLB. Obviously he is a liar and a fraud.
Outstanding! The Supremes seem to have effectively CANCELLED the requirement that a Federal employee properly submit his credentials in order to get a job.
In fact, they might just have cancelled the Constitution that created them. How's that for a crisis, kiddies? Forget the freeze dried waffles and wampum.
Sock away another couple boxes of fizz, and keep 'em DRY. It's gonna be a LONG WINTER
yeah. im glad that the american people have no right to enforce the constitution. far as us libs are concerned we should be able to wipe our filthy butts with it.
Thank you for posting this, Politicophobia1776.
writersblock26 4 months ago
@writersblock26 Your welcome. Thank you for watching.
Politicophobia1776 3 months ago
Funny, there were questions about both candidates eligibility, but only one was heard in court, the wrong one. Am I seeing a case of discrimination here? Both issues were the same, but only the white guy has to prove he's eligible?
joebananatube 8 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
“FONT FACE, POST ’67 SELECTRIC | NWO WHITEHOUSE DECEPTION!”
Lt. Col. Terrence Lakin KNOWS online!
Online, American Thinker's site details monkey business:
Obama-abomination. "Joe Farmer" rips through the
"the dude’s" lies. LEARN: about flabby lips; all aspects
of Hawaii's HRS 338-5; HRS 338-17.8;
HRS 338-14.3; jailbait-Dr. Fukino; res judicata;
His Excellency Peter Ogego, Kenyan Ambassador to
US-CONFIRMED–born, Kenya; WRIF FM Detroit; ‘Ouch
SEE: USA PROOF!!! Obama Birth Certificate Fraud
LogicCheck 10 months ago
Those old chicken shits don't give a damn about our constitution.
hsharrott 1 year ago
Well, what would you aspect? Justice?
starr522 1 year ago
cuz the usa has been taken over by commie terrorist
FLIP36D 2 years ago
Gisybel is clarity353 and about 100 other youtube accounts she cancelled when people blocked her for harassment. Seems she has no life and comes here 24/7 to bash anyone who stands up for the Constitution. She's a communist and a schizo. Be forewarned.
ginsley12 3 years ago
You are very immature and you can't prove anything not even can you prove I'm that person. Bye loser!
Gisybel 3 years ago
Prove Obama ever said he was a "natural born citizen" on fight the smears? Notice he didn't? Wonder why huh? Cuz he knows he's not. Clever use of words, but he and YOU haven't fooled anyone. This will continue to be in the courts. The bailout is now in the courts for the second time. First by Bloomberg. Now the second patriot act is up, only by Obama and people are starting to see he's nothing but another Bush. He has a Clinton payback team to keep Bill from talking like he threatened to do.
ginsley12 3 years ago
Let's see what else. All the troops from Iraq, that Bambi didn't want in this war, are now just going to be redirected to Pakistan and increased. He's going to police America, take away all your gun or at least the ammo to shoot them with, starting with the gun dealers, your ass is going to be drafted this year. Enjoy your president. He's not mine. I don't intend to do a damn thing he says. I'm on vacation for the next 4 years. You can go be his slave. He's bleeding your money already. Have fun
ginsley12 3 years ago
Hey Pete, did you bother reading the court opinons in cases they deny. Sometimes it takes until mid-year before they come out. Go do some homework because you obviously did none. Natural born citizen was clear enough for John Bingham, Pete. How come you don't know? It was clear enough for those who relied on Vattel Law of Nations that the Supreme Court accepts as a legal reference, too. Seems you don't know much about that either. You need a history lesson and an education. I know more than you!
ginsley12 3 years ago
Yes, Vattel is cited by the SC often, but Lynch v Clarke and Wong Kim Ark both speak pretty directly on what constitutes a natural born citizen, and both say that your interpretation is incorrect. They are both still valid caselaw and would be precedent for any future case on this.
And it's pretty rare for the SC to issue any opinion at all when they deny cert, so I wouldn't hold my breath for any opinion from them in Donofrio or any other NBC case.
qwertyman129 2 years ago
I hate to tell you this, but one look at Lynch v. Clarke and I see nothing but a bunch of cases after that that disagreed with that judge. They said that the judge in Lynch was making up law, not interpreting it. He said that's not judicial, it's legislative. Lynch judge decided that he didn't want a bunch of "alien generations" running around so that's why he decided what he did. What the hell kind of bs is that for a judge? Truth is, I can name 50 cases that disagree with you too.
ginsley12 2 years ago
I'm really not sure where you're getting that from. The Lynch decision is still good law, was cited positively in Wong Kim Ark, and has been used in treatises about citizenship this year.
The specificity of your language makes it seem like you haven't made this up, but I'm not sure where you're coming from here.
But please, name me 50 cases that disagree with this interpretation of natural born citizen.
And citizenship was defined by the 14th Amendment; anybody born in the US is a citizen.
qwertyman129 2 years ago
yeah i'm gonna do that in a little box like this. don't be stupid and go look it up yourself and don't say you did, because that idiotic explanation of 14th amend just proved you're a moron. read it again, subject to THIS jurisdiction and no other. that don't include dual citizens bud.
ginsley12 2 years ago
"All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States" And no other? That appears nowhere within the amendment. Maybe you should reread the 14th amendment if you think it said "and no other."
Further, this was interpreted in Wong Kim Ark to include people born within the US to alien parents to be citizens at birth.
Again, you could provide specific language, or a source. I've found nothing. You could also send a PM.
qwertyman129 2 years ago
And you think Wong is constitutional, eh? It's not. I could prove that and I can't even vote yet. That interpretation makes Wong a dual citizen, one of china and one of the U.S. The framers disallowed double allegiances. If that point went to court, you realize what would happen, right? Right?
ginsley12 2 years ago
Yes, Wong certainly is. Courts are bound to follow it on the basis of stare decisis unless they feel it's clearly wrong. Given that it's been positively cited hundreds of times since and that it's become a major bedrock of our interpretation of what it means to be an American citizen, I doubt it's getting overturned any time soon.
Again, citizenship got defined by the 14th Amendment, as interpreted by the SC - if you're born on American soil, you're an American from birth.
qwertyman129 2 years ago
Again, this country doesn't recognize dual citizens as eligble for the presidency. Quote me where that statue took effect because I'd like to read it. Far as I know, the framers used patrus sequitur patrem for freemen. Patrus sequitur ventrem applied to property only. THAT was the common law understood by the law of nations. The condition is, you follow the nationality of your father, not your mother. I don't where you got that being born here makes you eligible to run for POTUS, it doesn't.
ginsley12 2 years ago
Obama's dual citizenship expired automatically at his 21st birthday.
Being born in the US makes you eligible for the presidency. This is really not a controversial idea. See Jill Prior on the Natural Born Citizenship Clause, 97 Yale L.J. 881 (1988).
Again, name a single current legal scholar who believes there's a difference between a native-born citizen and a natural born citizen. Just like you could name 50 cases that disagree with Lynch v. Clarke.
qwertyman129 2 years ago
I think you need to study more and go back in history a lot more than you come off as being learned at. You simply don't know what you're talking about. Try reading a history book. Being born here doesn't make you a citizen, even per the 14th amend. Maybe you should go read the entire line next time.
ginsley12 2 years ago
Under the 14th, unless you are a member of an invading military, a child of a foreign diplomat (or maybe an illegal immigrant) if you are born in the US, you're an American citizen from birth. You're the one who's putting forth a seriously extreme interpretation of the constitution. You're going to have to provide some support for your position.
qwertyman129 2 years ago
You're an idiot, the 14th says "subject to the jurisdiction thereof" when they asked what it meant, they said, "Owing no other allegiance to anyone else, THAT is what it means!" direct quote by the way. Nice try, but I do my homework. You can't fool me. You can pull the wool over some other dummy's head, but I'm not you're average stupid kid. In fact, none of us are as stupid as you think we are and we're going to be in power soon, over YOU.
ginsley12 2 years ago
You may do your homework, but if this is as obvious as an idea as you believe it to be, cite a single current legal scholar who agrees with you. I'll go ahead and bet you didn't even look at the article I cited earlier.
Wong Kim Ark is binding SC precedent and holds that anybody born within the US (with exceptions I mentioned) are American citizens from birth. This was questioned and defined by the Supreme Court, and while you may think they decided wrong, it's been done for over a century.
qwertyman129 2 years ago
If you had any idea how many flip-flopping precedents there were on this subject, you wouldn't have made that statement. Ark specifically said they weren't even ruling on NBC, they said he was a citizen only. The Lynch case made up still another "class" of citizens out of thin air. You may love your Obamaboy, but try taking off the blinders next time and see it for what it is, LIES. The framers said no foreign influence, period. You can't change the Const. without an amendment so don't try it.
ginsley12 2 years ago
That's why these justices say, "oh i'm not talking about POTUS, i'm just making another class of citizens" which they had no right to do anyway. Because they know damn well they can't without an amendment and certainly not about some Wong kid who wasn't even running for POTUS. Then years later it's YOU people who decide it applies to POTUS candidates. We still have a POTUS clause and you didn't prove the framers included dual citizens in that clause, because you can't. It doesn't EXIST.
ginsley12 2 years ago
qwerty has this impression that if you just dump a kid here as a foreigner and take him off to foreign lands, it's ok to come back and have the kid run for POTUS. God, I'd love to be a fly on the wall if one of the framers came back and saw this mangling of their constitution. They'd probably hang people like you. I know they didn't mean that and why? Because I read their books, you obviously aren't literate enough nor care to see what they had to say about it. They wrote it, not you.
ginsley12 2 years ago
All this shit is, is a backdoor'ing of the constitution little by little by all you communists until you wake up one day and there all you are, thinking we're all stupid and telling everyone that every foreigner or half-breed can run for POTUS. It's a lie. They couldn't change the constitution so they whittled it down with BS decisions and legislations to get around it. It's obvious. It's blatant. It's disgusting and treason. You're out to kill off this country and more and more people know it.
ginsley12 2 years ago
if there's a subsequent case which overturns Wong Kim Ark, cite it! If there is a current scholar who agrees with you, cite it! If a Framer wrote a book defining NBC, CITE IT!
You can make assertions all you want, but they don't make them true in any way, shape or form.
So long as that person dumped here is natural born, 35 years old and has spent 14 years in the US, then yes, that person can run for POTUS!
qwertyman129 2 years ago
The Writings of George Washington, Alexander Hamilton, James Madison, the rest of the Founders, IDIOT! Go READ it! You're a dumbass! Ark NEVER said he was a "natural born citizen". In fact, the Judge dissenting said children follow the condition of their FATHER and has ALWAYS been the way. That IS the way the Founders said it and any judge is going to have to go BACK in history when they decide NBC and then YOU are going to LOSE, faggot.
ginsley12 2 years ago
Don't worry asshole. Just because you got one judge to agree with your sorry commie ass doesn't mean the one in NJ will. Obama has until Monday.
ginsley12 2 years ago
The fact that you are citing the dissent as support shows how little you understand how the law works. The dissent forms no part of law and is not binding on anyone.
You are right in that the SC did not explicitly define Ark as NBC, but there is LOTS of dicta in the opinion to suggest they would if that was the question they had to answer.
Again, name just one case that overruled Ark or Lynch v. Clarke. You said you could name 50, I only want you to name one.
I won't hold my breath.
qwertyman129 2 years ago
The dissent proves that was the common law and even the civil law going back to the signing of the Constitution and before even that! This judge just decided to make up his own and you know what that means? He can be discarded. Not only that, but he never decided what an NBC was. The dissent hints to that! So where does that put your boy Obama? In the fucking dual citizen (foreign influence) category where he belongs and when THAT comes out, there's gonna be hell to pay.
ginsley12 2 years ago
Pro-tip: you cannot simply discard a Supreme Court majority opinion because you believe it to be incorrectly decided.
Pro-tip: when making a legal argument, try to avoid citing dissents. They're dissents because a majority of the Supreme Court disagrees with that opinion.
However, I'll ask for a fourth time: name a single SC decision that overturns Wong, or a single current legal scholar who agrees with your position.
qwertyman129 2 years ago
Oh yes I can esp. when Ark specifically SAID they weren't deciding who was a natural born citizen. That Judge KNEW he was trying to cross the line because all the legal precedents before him disagreed and so did the dissenting opinion. Guess what? You can't use Ark to make Obama eligible for POTUS because the SCOTUS even admitted they weren't deciding that. So go cry more. It ain't gonna fly but the rest of the cases that prove what the framers meant and the writings of the framers will.
ginsley12 2 years ago
Pro-tip: When trying to defend your marxist buddy, try not to use law that admitted it had nothing to do with the presidency. you're not taking over this country. it's going back to the way it was intended to be. You will be the minority around here. You abort all your kids anyway. The new generation is brought up right and will make things right. I'll put ppl like you on a boat and cast it out to sea if you keep running your mouth.
ginsley12 2 years ago
It wasn't a majority opinion asshole and get it through your fucking thick head - IT HAS NOTHING TO DO WITH THE PRESIDENCY and the new precedent is coming soon. Before Obama thinks he can take over the SCOTUS too.
ginsley12 2 years ago
HUNDREDS I said, that's right.. HUNDREDS! Go read United States Supreme Court Reports By United States. Supreme Court, Lawyers Co-operative Publishing Company
Then open your big trap because you're an idiot.
ginsley12 2 years ago
Go fuck yourself jerkoff. I'm done with your communist crap. You're gonna find out how it's gonna be around here and it won't be your way. That's a fact. You're not in charge here. This generation will be. You're going down and I'll probably run for President one of these days and call out people like you and remind everyone what the framers warned about- people like you. You're an asshole and a scumbag. Go fuck yourself.
ginsley12 2 years ago
Fucking jerkoff coming in here and saying Wong Kim Ark case decided that foreigners could be president now. What a fucking ASSHOLE!
ginsley12 2 years ago
The doctrine you keep citing of citizenship coming from one's father has not been invoked in ANY case since the dissent of Wong. The reason for that is the majority (yes, 6 out of 9 is a majority!) held that anybody born on American soil is an American from birth, with limited exceptions.
You argue that there's a distinction between native born citizen and NBC, but cite absolutely no support, either because you're too stupid to look it up, or actually have and realize that there is none.
qwertyman129 2 years ago
I'm a scumbag because I asked you to name a single case that agrees with your position, and instead you referred me to the 540+ volume SC Reports.
If you read carefully (something you seem incapable of) you'll see that I haven't expressed support or opposition to Obama. All I've done is dispute your legal argument, that there is a difference between a native born citizen and a natural born citizen. No serious scholar agrees with your position, no court decision agrees with your decision.
qwertyman129 2 years ago
"Children, born in England, of such aliens, were therefore natural-born subjects." Wong, 169 U.S. 655. The opinion discusses English common law and concludes that children born of aliens were natural born subjects. He doesn't outright declare the same to be the case here, but it's really strong evidence.
It's like banging my head against a wall, because I know you never will name a single case that overrules Wong or cite a scholar that supports this position.
qwertyman129 2 years ago
@qwertyman129 "The Supreme Court has never explicitly ruled on whether children born in the United States to illegal immigrant parents are entitled to birthright citizenship via the 14th Amendment,although it has generally been assumed that they are. A birth certificate (a.k.a Certificate of Live Birth for children born in certain states) issued by a U.S. state or territorial government is evidence of citizenship, ..." United States v. Wong Kim Ark, 169 U.S. 649 (1898)
sitabanu 1 year ago
Cite where they say that. I have the case in front of me. Cite a page number, or a direct quote, because that language is not in there.
You're just outright making shit up at this point.
qwertyman129 2 years ago
patrus sequitur patrem, faggot. Go look it up. It was the common law at the signing of the constitution and that is going to reflect what an NBC is because I read those history books and that is what they said. You're a commie jerkoff and this next generation is gonna have severe penalities for you jackasses. You THINK you're getting away with this tax and crap bill that just went through the house. Just you wait. We're changing this country BACK to the way it was meant to be and you LOSE.
ginsley12 2 years ago
The Federalist Papers don't define natural born citizen, nor does the Constitution. If you have read this to be clear in so many history books, name one, just one book that supports you! A single one! It shouldn't be that hard!
Yes, Partus sequitur patrem, a lovely piece of sexist common law. If your father isn't a citizen, you aren't a citizen. Often switched to ventrem to make slavery easier to sustain. Last time it appears in an American case is the dissent of Wong. Well done.
qwertyman129 2 years ago
The fucking Constitution doesn't define what a citizen is either jerkoff. It doesn't define what a arms are either, but you guys sure as hell want to put limits on those while giving yourselves blanket access to stuff the framers NEVER intended. Read the fucking history dickwad and you won't come off as so pathetically ignorant. This shit stops NOW. You're not getting away with what you're doing. The whole fucking thing is going to come out and Obama and your ilk will probably go to jail.
ginsley12 2 years ago
That sexist law, as you call it, was the law and the adopted by the framers. Women couldn't vote or own property, so there. Goes back to the Roman Empire, go blame them jackass. Shows what you don't know. The legal precedent backs up that position of the framers and that's the only thing that matters, what they meant by NBC and that little latin clause is going to put your boy back in Kenya where he belongs. He's no American and neither are YOU.
ginsley12 2 years ago
You follow the nationality of your FATHER, not your mother and there's NO precedent that says otherwise regarding who is eligible to the presidency. show me one and don't point to the 14th amend., that says SUBJECT TO THE JURISDICTION THEREOF and Obama ADMITS he was subject to Great Britain. Case closed, he can't be President!
ginsley12 2 years ago
There's hundreds of precedent during the time the framers were alive and beyond that backup the FACT that the common law was that you followed the condition of the father concerning nationality. Every case follows the ancestry when deciding nationality and it depended on the father. The writings of the framers acknowledge it and cite it, including Vattel who wrote a book on Internat'l Law which the courts used and cited also as a backup to their Const, proving that was exactly what they meant.
ginsley12 2 years ago
Hundreds of precedents you say? NAME ONE! You keep upping the number. First you said there were 50 cases that proved me wrong, now you say there are hundreds. All I'm asking for is one case that says that Wong is overturned and that we're back to this standard that maybe never even existed of a NBC being the child of two American citizens.
1. Name a single case that overturns Wong.
2. Name a single current legal scholar that believes that a native born citizen is not a natural born citizen
qwertyman129 2 years ago
What matters is what the framers thought, not what these idiot judges change their minds about all day long.
ginsley12 2 years ago
let's just say, you're going to find out when this gets heard, one way or the other.
ginsley12 2 years ago
Pete william has lost all credibility with that stunt he pulled on the Donofrio case. He's not fooling anyone and neither his this video. You guys lied and you got caught. You fail.
ginsley12 3 years ago
"My teacher"(a lawyer) told me that Natural born citizen is being born in U.S Natural, "natura" is Latin for birth. "Natural born citizen" is not defined in the Constitution. Obama is a Natural born citizen, because he was born in Hawaii and his mom was American. His UK citizenship was given to him as a baby and that will not compromise loyalty to U.S. Obama is qualified to be President and there is nothing you and the other clowns can do. All lawsuits have been DISMISSED, OK??
clarity353 3 years ago
If I had a dime for every account you claimed you were a law student under, clarity, I'd be rich.
Knock it off with your lies. You never even graduated grammar school. Anyone could tell that by reading your idiotic ramblings.
ginsley12 3 years ago
Folks--Obama had to prove his citizenship to get on the ballot. Hawaii confirms he was born there. His mother was an American citizen.
Mind you, he could show a video tape of his birth and it still wouldn't satisfy some people. Sad, really.
zahir13 3 years ago
You clearly do not understand the role of the Supreme Court. The court UPHELD the constitution here with judicial restraint. They had good reason to deny this case under the political question doctrine also not to mention this guy had no standing. Submitting your birth certificate to the correct parties has nothing to do with showing it to the SC or showing it on TV or mailing you a personal copy! Even if he did all of that there would still be idiots out there that don't believe it.
afinlv 3 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
I would never have voted for Obama
if anyone would have been told
he was not natural born before
I voted. I've been cheated and
I WON'T TOLERATE IT. 107
az10101010 3 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
ONE WAY OR THE OTHER
before he takes office
or after he takes office
obama WILL NOT be president
IT'S AGAINST THE LAW
his father is a foreigner
059
az10101010 3 years ago
the courts cannot intervene before there is a crime..
when obama takes office willfully and knowingly that his father was not of this country- only then will he be arrested and charged with a crime.. the law is the law- nobody can beat the law.. 051
az101010 3 years ago
if he is a illegal alien then he has broken the law just for even being in the country.
leemer12 3 years ago
Did you hear this report? DISMISSED! as per US Constitution 14th Amendment Article IV, Section 1, Clause 1, makes Obama a natural born citizen by birth. Barack Obama's participation in his British citizenship was non-existent, to the extent that does not compromise loyalty to the US. Citizenship is NOT based on parentage but on where someone is born and he was born in Hawaii. Case Closed. End of Conspiracy theories, get the facts no more lies.
clarity353 3 years ago
check again what makes one eligible to be president as a natural born.. might surprise you..
also now see this at the checkstand:
Obama Election
ILLEGAL!
Shocking charges threaten
his presidency
this ain't going away- bush never
had is so good..
az10101010 3 years ago
I am in law school, almost finishing. You can't tell me what makes a person elegible.
Obama is and you'll see him as the 44th President of the U.S. Case Closed!!
clarity353 3 years ago
"US Citizenship is NOT based on parentage"
correct..
now ask your teacher what is the difference between citizenship and natural born citizen..
az10101010 3 years ago
clarity353 is the one running around making new accounts to come to each of these threads. She's a total O-bot nutcase schizophrenic.
ginsley12 3 years ago
idiot I am not clarity I am me Gisybel. You are the paranoic.
Gisybel 3 years ago
You're a liar, too. Everyone knows all your alts, clarity, gisybel and all the others you were blocked using so you cancel them everytime you are blocked. You're not fooling anyone. You just created that account yesterday. Do you think we're stupid? Everyone and I mean EVERYONE is onto you.
ginsley12 3 years ago
You're so stupid it's not even funny. The 14th amendment was CHANGED from "natural born citizen" to "citizen". Gee, I wonder why? Could it be because they knew the difference and you don't? You're such a freakin idiot, clarity. No one likes you. Everyone hates you as a matter of fact. You have no life. You get blocked everyone you go. You constantly make new accounts to spread your lies around. Just die already.
ginsley12 3 years ago
You just hate Obama and you and all obamanots are ignorants, Dont' bother me anymore with your frustration. HE WON, move out of town or kill yourself!
Gisybel 3 years ago
I hate people like you. You're hypocrites. You dems were the ones crying over McCain in 2000 and then again in 2008 for the same damn reason. Now it's get off my back because it's your man? Get the hell away from me you hypocrite.
ginsley12 3 years ago
And everyone knows you're clarity, Gisybel. Making another account now again? How many do you need to agree with yourself? See a shrink and then jump off a cliff.
ginsley12 3 years ago
You are paranoic and immature I don't have to jump off a cliff because I am happy obama won and I am going to the Inauguration dumb. And let me tell you I never liked McCain he is an old fart idiot and I was always democrat.
Gisybel 3 years ago
You're an idiot. I hope you lose every dime and no social security or job. I hope you rely on your precious bambi for your every need and get drafted. It's already in the news today that as soon as the bailout goes through, you're going, male or female. Get hopping, boy. Do your homage to Mr. kenyan.
ginsley12 3 years ago
How stupid of you believing he is Kenyan all of you obamanots that is the only thing you do blah blah, why don't you prove it? Go ahead prove his Kenyan bc. That is why all the lawsuits have been dismissed, because you and all those lawyers are just clowns with no proof, hahaha. The judges are wipping their butts with these lawsuits lol!
Gisybel 3 years ago
His father is Kenyan. Obama admits his birth dual loyalties. He claims he's a "native born citizen" but only has a certification of live birth that Hawaii hands out to everyone, including people NOT born in this country. ALL FACT, straight from Hawaii Vital Statistics and Obama's own mouth. No further proof required. Native born is not natural born. He's not eligible. Neither was McCain. Neither was Calero who was thrown off the ballot by 5 other secretaries of state for the same reason.
ginsley12 3 years ago
Ok then we are going to have a British president, how cool! I don't want to discuss this with a very ignorant person.
Watch this: Is Obama a natural born American citizen? by southsidetokyo, here in Youtube you'll see why all the lawsuits are going to be dumped. I don't need your response and read my lips: He is not going to be removed from Office. Case Closed
Gisybel 3 years ago
Wrong! YOU are going to have a usurper who is pretending to be president. He's not MY president. You elected the idiot. I'm not taking any orders. You go do it!
ginsley12 3 years ago
what this video, Is Barack Obama a natural born American citizen by southsidetokyo.
Gisybel 3 years ago
No. keep your lying videos and your schizo alts. Try a history book, idiot.
ginsley12 3 years ago
No, see? I am pretty sure if he shows his long bc all of will say is fake too. Watch the video and see for yourself the proof,it is a TV report on Obama's citizenship. And the opinion of the Supreme Court.
Gisybel 3 years ago
If you don't take orders you'll go to jail, dumb.
Gisybel 3 years ago
Wanna bet stupid? This is a free country. I'll do what I want. I'm be on medical leave for the next 4 years? What are you going to do? Argue with my doctor? Back injury, sorry. No can do anything you say. Oh and you can pay for it too. HAHHAHAHAHAHA
ginsley12 3 years ago
Obama, Michelle and Dean are going to jail, not me.
ginsley12 3 years ago
no, they are not. They are all legal.
Gisybel 3 years ago
the communists are still trying to divert attention to the BC issue.. they know obama is not natural born because he told everyone his father was not of this country.. obama will be impeached- there's no way around that..
az101010 3 years ago
Shut up, Gisybel. Just because YOU say so doesn't make it true. Get over yourself. You're pathetic and obsessed.
ginsley12 3 years ago
He'll be removed one way or the other, either as the worst usurper in history in 4 years or in handcuffs when the truth comes out, and it will. The truth came out about Chester Arthur and the truth will come out about Obama. Just like the truth already came out about you Gisybel/clarity, etc., etc.schizo
ginsley12 3 years ago
How old are you? 10? watch the video and you'll see.
Gisybel 3 years ago
Cant beleive you americans are allowing this illegal action. The media cares more about pointless stupid matters like palins wardrobe and terrorists but no one knows obamas true identity?.Why are you Amercans taking their lies sitting down? Your government has flaunted your constitution and allowed this non american citizen to become YOUR president and your taking it up the yazoo like little girls.
If you Americans let this illegal action slip by YOU are to blame and feel sorry for your country
vincenz55 3 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
UNCONSTITUTIONAL because BY NATURE you will be
loyal to your father's country AND loyal to your
mother's country. The law requires a president
to be loyal only to the US with both parents
being a US citizen. Spread the word and go to
RallyCongress[dot]com because it's the JOB of
congress to uphold the constitution BEFORE
swearing in a new president. Forget the BC.062
az10101010 3 years ago
Neither of your parents have to be americans for you to be eligible to be president of the united states. BUT you HAVE to be born on american soil. No matter your past ancestery, all you have to do is be born on American Soil.
And Obama was most certainly born in Kenya Africa. On African soil, not American soil.
eclecticshaman 3 years ago
"not conservativism, it's sore loserism"
-David Horowitz
dvrjosh 3 years ago
eclectic- you got it backwards.. both parents MUST be US citizens..
also obama is a citizen because his birth was registered in hawaii and nowhere else..
az10101010 3 years ago
No. no where in the constitution does it say both parents have to be US citizens. It says you must be A Natural Born Citizen. And one can not be a "Natural Born Citizen" if you were born in Kenya and are a citizen of Indonesia.
eclecticshaman 3 years ago
obama cannot be an american president because he will naturally be loyal to his mothers country and loyal to his fathers country.. this is against the constitution. go to RallyCongress[dot]com. 051
az10101010 3 years ago
Age and Citizenship requirements - US Constitution, Article II, Section 1
No person except a natural born citizen, or a citizen of the United States, at the time of the adoption of this Constitution, shall be eligible to the office of President; neither shall any person be eligible to that office who shall not have attained to the age of thirty-five years, and been fourteen years a resident within the United States.
jimitl5 3 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
UNCONSTITUTIONAL because BY NATURE you will be
loyal to your father's country AND loyal to your mother's
country. The law requires a president to be loyal only
to the US with both parents being a US citizen. Spread
the word and write to members of congress because it's
the JOB of congress to uphold the constitution BEFORE
swearing in a new president. 033
az10101010 3 years ago
UNCONSTITUTIONAL because by nature you will be loyal to your father's country AND to your mother's country.. spread the word fast because it's the JOB of congress to uphold the constitution when swearing in a new president.. 005
az10101010 3 years ago
There is a million dollar reward for anyone who can produce the birth certificate. Why doesn't obama produce the certificate and give the money to charity? Seems pretty selfish and evil if he doesn't.
Smetch 3 years ago
we see just how 'American' obama is in the future -- -don't be surprised when we are looking more like germany that the U.S. by the time he is done
RockTheFacts 3 years ago
Germany is a pretty nice place today :)
dvrjosh 3 years ago
Germany is no where near democratic. A girl in my class just came here from there because her parents want her to have a chance at college. In Germany you go to school for 13 years,then are forced into serving the governemnt for a year, then only a select few get to go to college, in Germany you MUST take care of your parents - it is part of their constitution..nursing homes are only for the people whose kids have died. Germans' freedoms aren't at all like our freedoms.
RockTheFacts 3 years ago
Also, in Germany kids have to be really good at their extracurricular activites. A school bands came here to talk to us, they are much better at music than we are, but that's because only 3 kids in the whole orchestra play sports (this was 8th grade)the school (government) wants you excel at one thing so you don't try everything like you do here
RockTheFacts 3 years ago
Yeah, I had a friend in the Navy who grew up in Germany. I do think there's still something to be said for a rounded, liberal arts education but it's interesting.
I certainly wouldn't make fun of Germany today. It's doing a lot of things well.
dvrjosh 3 years ago
Is Justice Thomas a Racist?
rocksiphone 3 years ago
Do you ever think that if Hilary/McCain were real oponents of Obama why they didn't investigate his citizenship? Obama was put in by the Shadow Govt/Bankers
rocksiphone 3 years ago
Or you could apply Murphy's Law...
dvrjosh 3 years ago
Or maybe they did investigate his citizenship and found out that he was born in Hawaii. Did you know that Hillary Clinton REALLY wanted to be president? She didn't bring it up. Nor McCain, nor Fox News. Nor the FBI. Not the CIA. You think he wasn't vetted by any of them. Face reality. McCain lost. Obama won.
melora72 3 years ago
Why don't Obama just show his Birth Certificate? I mean he is President and the people have the Right to see it. I could care less who Won out of that bunch, they are all Puppets of the Real Master's
rocksiphone 3 years ago
The point is that he doesn't HAVE to produce anything until compelled to by a court. He is allowing his enemies to reveal themselves, spend their time and money on something that the FBI is required, by law, to investigate BEFORE he can recieve federal funding, secret service protection or any other public benefits....this does not include security clearances he holds from being a Senator.
gwhitetx 3 years ago
His enemies, the people of the United States who has the right to know is an enemies of Obama?
Did you hear Obama say he had no contact with the Illinois Governor that got arrested today and some guy that works for him said he did?
That Governor wanted money for the current Senate seat, you mean he didn't want any money from Obama?
rocksiphone 3 years ago
WHAT EVER. you see my friend, there is a problem with your second sentence. Barack Obama does not have to show mr. Berg his birth certificate. that is HIS Right. dont you all think there is a reason why every court this goes to throws it out. because it is nonsense, if there was any relevence to this, both clinton and mccain would have brought it up
SEEPRICE 3 years ago
This is not the Berg case, this is the Donofrio case - there are 14 such cases across the country right now.He has to show it to the states' attorney generals where he was on the ballot, but the states where the law applied did not due their due dilegence.
RockTheFacts 3 years ago
They have rejected ALL of the cases. They are not going to interfere after all the flack they got in 2000 for picking Bush. And there is no reason to. These people are trying to prove that Obama is not American enough to be President. That is the real motive behind these frivalous lawsuits.
melora72 3 years ago
melora72, not only have they not "rejected ALL of the cases," but the stronger Wrotnowski's in conference this Friday. And yes, we are trying to uphold Constitution's provision for Presidential loyalty to America. I'm not sure this CNN guy is correct when he says it's being argued that *both* parents had to be citizens of the US. My understanding is it's ok if one parent has foreign citizenship if it is not transfered to child at birth, which is what happened in BO's case with UK law.
EncompassedRunner 3 years ago
It only takes one senator and one congressman to request a stay of election until Obama shows proof. If they don't stand up before Jan 20 it's all over for America. God's gable is gonna fall. And there will be no going back cause Obama will put in at least four liberal supreme court justices. This will shape America four next 40 years. McCain was our last hope to overturn abortion, gay marriage and the policy of pushing Israel in giving away land for peace.
spiritledd 3 years ago
1st off, the supreme court justices are posted for life, so until one either retires, dies, falls extremely ill, or is forces to resign do to bad behavior, Obama cannot replace them.
2nd, EVERY president fills the open post with whoever they want,usually one from his own party.
3, It should be obvious that Obama is standing by his word and filling positions with both liberals and republicans
lastly Mccain was YOUR last hope because the American the Majority, Voted for Obama
read a book
SEEPRICE 3 years ago 2
Well hello media! Where ya been? Thanks for covering this story - NOW THAT'S IS OVER!
CNN (ESPECIALLY,) NBC, CBS, MSNBC:
YELLOW DOG JOURNALISM AT IT'S BEST!
hangingonat60 3 years ago
Wow. Sad day for all Americans. If Obama had one bit of integrity and he had nothing to hide, he would RUN to the SCOTUS and hand deliver a certified copy of his long form COLB. Obviously he is a liar and a fraud.
dcalimited 3 years ago
Wow, so much for the constitution
johnr25ks 3 years ago
Outstanding! The Supremes seem to have effectively CANCELLED the requirement that a Federal employee properly submit his credentials in order to get a job.
In fact, they might just have cancelled the Constitution that created them. How's that for a crisis, kiddies? Forget the freeze dried waffles and wampum.
Sock away another couple boxes of fizz, and keep 'em DRY. It's gonna be a LONG WINTER
derfreebie 3 years ago
yeah. im glad that the american people have no right to enforce the constitution. far as us libs are concerned we should be able to wipe our filthy butts with it.
allentgary 3 years ago