For those that are interested. It is a gas container that was blown up. The fuel flask was positioned directly infront of it. You may ask why a gas container was used instead of C4. Well I guess no sane
person will strap C4 to a nuclear flask. Also for explosive power you really cant beat a gas cylinder. The recommended safety zone for emergency personnel around a single gas cylinder that may blow up is 200m, that tells you the power of it, imagine the power of a container the size used.............
Was the gas container filled with propane or something like that? And was the red stuff pumped below it undyed (offroad) diesel fuel?
torque395 1 year ago
wow Scott (BUG)
believersunderground 2 years ago
Comment removed
BrianDavid79 2 years ago
And the point in this was?
euanpw 4 years ago
to partially prove the integrity of the flask maybe??????????
hijack72 4 years ago
For those that are interested. It is a gas container that was blown up. The fuel flask was positioned directly infront of it. You may ask why a gas container was used instead of C4. Well I guess no sane
hijack72 4 years ago
person will strap C4 to a nuclear flask. Also for explosive power you really cant beat a gas cylinder. The recommended safety zone for emergency personnel around a single gas cylinder that may blow up is 200m, that tells you the power of it, imagine the power of a container the size used.............
hijack72 4 years ago
OMFG!!!!! BIG EXPLOSION!!! YAY!!!!
Pensinspace 4 years ago
hewnce?
Pensinspace 4 years ago
what was the point of blowning up the flask?Was it to prove that type was unsafe.
DuoLawrence 5 years ago
its a gas tank wagon not a nuclear flask transporter
grid56032uk 4 years ago