Perhaps they could employ someone who could speak acceptable english next time. 'Fum' (thumb), 'Wiv' (with), 'Lihel' (little)....you get the idea. The letter T is there for a reason, if you don't use it you sound like you've escaped from a production of Oliver or My Fair Lady. I've seen italian and spanish reviewers with a better english pronounciation that this.
Hi, Recently I observe some shift in y-axis once I take a snap. Do you have any idea of why this is happening? Little more detail: I see a an object which is completely in the frame. After taking the snap, the object lies little bit shifted from the frame. Thanks for the support.
@praburamanathan The Alpha 350 does not have a 100% viewfinder. I think its about 95%, which means you get a bit more in the picture than you see in the viewfinder. It should be an even amount on each side but perhaps in your case it isn't.
I have the A350 and i love it so far but will have to sell it because i notice i record alot of mini videos and it makes sense to just carry around one dslr tht can do both record movies and take great pictures..sad to see it go but if anyone is in the market for one let me know.
turn on > menu > right > right > right > right > right (Spanner 1) > down > down > down > down (second to bottom) > select > (up to the very top) > Select.
Image stabilisation in the BODY (A.350)does-away with the need to buy expensive Image-Stabilized-Lenses as you would if you buy the Canon on Nikon equiv'. = Worth getting the A.350 'Twin-Lens-kit' (18-70mm & 55-200mm) NOW (while you can), as it's been replaced by the A.380 = much dearer (no-better !)
Some dealers still stock the A.350, but be quick, as the A.380 has mainly replaced it on the dealers shelves - naturally, at more £/$ (roll-eyes !).
I'm getting ready to jump into a DSLR. Though, I can't figure out which would be the best one to buy atm. I am leaning towards Sony, even though there lens selection is a little bit fewer than the competition, there cameras just seem to be the better buy. Out of research I've done between the 330, and its competition, the camera seems to have the same picture quality as the competition, or better. I hope this is true.
I have a Tamron 17-50 2.8 which is excellent. It has a slight wide angle at the 17mm range and no wide angle at the 50mm telephoto end. Stop the lens up to f/4 and pictures are SUPER sharp. The slight wide angle is perfect for group shots with out adding much distortion, and there is very little darkness in the corners. It's well worth the $400. You can see other reviews on it online, and it usually has 5/5 or 4.5/5 marks. Best thing you can do, is go to a store and try a few lenses on.
my brother has the d80 and by all means it is nice but in your hands you can tell sony def did a great job the speed and clarity of this camera is as good as the nikon with more features plus with this it can match all your other stuff you have tv,computer,camera,printer,ps3,desktop,laptop,cell phone,psp,
I bought the a300 which is the exact same camera aside from the pixel resolution. I have the 18-70 + 75-300mm pack but I barely use either lens. I bought a used Minolta 50mm 1.7 prime lens on ebay for about $100 and a brand new Tamron 17-50 2.8 wide angle lens and they are amazing for low light, indoor shots.
the leader brand in what??? please tell me you are not talking about the dslr market... neither in the consumer nor in the professional segments of dslr the sony stands a chance against nikon or canon. btw. i own a a350. i am satisfied, but by no means sony is top of the noth...
Im looking to get a camera with very high detail within the image when zoomed in thorugh Photoshop,I was impressed with 10mp but What are the photos like taken from this have you got any you could send me?
well i dunno if i would call it a downside cause its just that you wont be able to see the image stabilization at work, but wether it is in the Lens or the Body shouldn't matter as they both work effectively, its just very reassuring when its on the lens because when it is turned on you can see the effect in the view finder.
There's pros and cons for each, Optical Stabilisation is arguably more effective because it can be matched to the lens (ie a big tele lens needs a different solution a shorter one), but more expensive since you have to buy the IS again every time you buy a new lens instead of just once, as with in-camera IS. But I think any differences are subtle and marginal and not worth agonising over.
thats cool
CamaraMountClamp 3 months ago
Perhaps they could employ someone who could speak acceptable english next time. 'Fum' (thumb), 'Wiv' (with), 'Lihel' (little)....you get the idea. The letter T is there for a reason, if you don't use it you sound like you've escaped from a production of Oliver or My Fair Lady. I've seen italian and spanish reviewers with a better english pronounciation that this.
maureenOWW 1 year ago
@maureenOWW Yes, I misspelled 'than' for comedy effect.
maureenOWW 1 year ago
Hi, Recently I observe some shift in y-axis once I take a snap. Do you have any idea of why this is happening? Little more detail: I see a an object which is completely in the frame. After taking the snap, the object lies little bit shifted from the frame. Thanks for the support.
praburamanathan 1 year ago
@praburamanathan The Alpha 350 does not have a 100% viewfinder. I think its about 95%, which means you get a bit more in the picture than you see in the viewfinder. It should be an even amount on each side but perhaps in your case it isn't.
WhatDigitalCamera 1 year ago
Hehe Polak się znalazł.
Patryk199356 1 year ago
Thank you for the video.
AssemMuhammed 2 years ago
the lens and the picture quality sucks. get a 450d instead
AirUpThere996 2 years ago
>dy2dlb: you can find the a350 manual online, google it :)
georasken 2 years ago
I have the A350 and i love it so far but will have to sell it because i notice i record alot of mini videos and it makes sense to just carry around one dslr tht can do both record movies and take great pictures..sad to see it go but if anyone is in the market for one let me know.
latin2c 2 years ago
How much are you asking for it?
Snakeman418 2 years ago
help me please. my aunt gave me sony a350 but the nenu is in japanese language. what should i do?
dy2dlb 2 years ago
turn on > menu > right > right > right > right > right (Spanner 1) > down > down > down > down (second to bottom) > select > (up to the very top) > Select.
That will change it to english.
cfish3r 2 years ago 6
thanks but i didnt work. one else should i do?
dy2dlb 2 years ago
learn japanese
crisno1 2 years ago
hahaha, Your right.
dy2dlb 2 years ago
god, i understand thats the only way to describe how to do it but its so funny XD
panzarw 2 years ago
one more vote for the 350!
aerospace82 2 years ago
Image stabilisation in the BODY (A.350)does-away with the need to buy expensive Image-Stabilized-Lenses as you would if you buy the Canon on Nikon equiv'. = Worth getting the A.350 'Twin-Lens-kit' (18-70mm & 55-200mm) NOW (while you can), as it's been replaced by the A.380 = much dearer (no-better !)
Some dealers still stock the A.350, but be quick, as the A.380 has mainly replaced it on the dealers shelves - naturally, at more £/$ (roll-eyes !).
Sony DT.55-200mm makes Twin-set = good-value
Hunstanton29 2 years ago
I would buy the a350 because of the optical image stabiliser. Its cheaper with buying lenses without a image stabiliser.
Innmanu 2 years ago
I'm getting ready to jump into a DSLR. Though, I can't figure out which would be the best one to buy atm. I am leaning towards Sony, even though there lens selection is a little bit fewer than the competition, there cameras just seem to be the better buy. Out of research I've done between the 330, and its competition, the camera seems to have the same picture quality as the competition, or better. I hope this is true.
SheldonA27 2 years ago
Sony Style has the a350 + 2 lenses + the veritcal grip for $699.99. Savings of $480.
ndn2369 2 years ago
I have this one! And I love it! I have a question.
Which wide-angle lens is the best for Alpha 350?
I'd be so gald, if someone answered back :)
CornflakeGirl95 2 years ago
I have a Tamron 17-50 2.8 which is excellent. It has a slight wide angle at the 17mm range and no wide angle at the 50mm telephoto end. Stop the lens up to f/4 and pictures are SUPER sharp. The slight wide angle is perfect for group shots with out adding much distortion, and there is very little darkness in the corners. It's well worth the $400. You can see other reviews on it online, and it usually has 5/5 or 4.5/5 marks. Best thing you can do, is go to a store and try a few lenses on.
ryanking23 2 years ago
do you have Sony A350??
CornflakeGirl95 2 years ago
Yes I do. And it is wonderful...
ryanking23 2 years ago
no just the 17-80mm
you can get the body and stock lens
for 560
the d80 is 600 and only 10.2 meg
i think the sony is better quality beacuse
my brother has the d80 and by all means it is nice but in your hands you can tell sony def did a great job the speed and clarity of this camera is as good as the nikon with more features plus with this it can match all your other stuff you have tv,computer,camera,printer,ps3,desktop,laptop,cell phone,psp,
socal1000 2 years ago
i thought u got 2 lenses with it...eh
PRAGMATICIST 2 years ago
350 body only = about £400
Carl Zeiss lens you recommended = £500
total = £900
would it not be better to just get a better camera kit to start with? say something like Nikkon D90 kit.
ketz555 2 years ago
I bought the a300 which is the exact same camera aside from the pixel resolution. I have the 18-70 + 75-300mm pack but I barely use either lens. I bought a used Minolta 50mm 1.7 prime lens on ebay for about $100 and a brand new Tamron 17-50 2.8 wide angle lens and they are amazing for low light, indoor shots.
bradleypaul10 3 years ago
if you want to buy this camera, which lens pack would you buy ??
18-70 + 75-300
or
18-50 + 55-200
What's your opinion ???
Ricky230180 3 years ago
I'd buy the 18-70mm + 75-300mm pack
sybyabraham 3 years ago 3
anybody knows which lens he recommend?
ashleewang 3 years ago
Sony alpha 350 or Canon EOS 450D?
jackin9p 3 years ago
ive got the same question, its killing me, i cant make up my mind of which to go for , did u end up buying either one
quack18 2 years ago
I bought the 450d, because it was for sale with 20% discount in The netherlands :D
Its pretty nice..
jackin9p 2 years ago
a300 or pentax k200d? :/ Hard to choose for me :(
galaris 3 years ago
alpha 350 or nikon d60 ?
haz0510 3 years ago
sony!
kezamizogabi 3 years ago
how about id D80?
which one
D80 or alpha 350 ?
haz0510 3 years ago
sony is still the leader brand,so go 4 it!
A350 is absolutely stunning..quality and everything is perfect in it.
Nikon is all right but..u know not that good
kezamizogabi 3 years ago
the leader brand in what??? please tell me you are not talking about the dslr market... neither in the consumer nor in the professional segments of dslr the sony stands a chance against nikon or canon. btw. i own a a350. i am satisfied, but by no means sony is top of the noth...
so please get your facts straight
alocan 3 years ago 2
it depands what company you like,because there are no best camera in the world, it is just only getting better.
tanhockjun 3 years ago
See some image samples from this and other cameras at our website. Go to Equipment>Digital SLRs>Sony.
WhatDigitalCamera 3 years ago
Would You recomend this for simple Photoshoots?
Im looking to get a camera with very high detail within the image when zoomed in thorugh Photoshop,I was impressed with 10mp but What are the photos like taken from this have you got any you could send me?
madsdesigns 3 years ago
will u recommend buyers to buy this sony alpha 350? what are the pros and cons? if we were to compare it with a canon 450D,which will work best?
rebelle505 3 years ago
450 D
TechnologicMe 3 years ago
Are there any down-sides about having the image stabilization in the camera instead of in the lense?
n40798 3 years ago
well i dunno if i would call it a downside cause its just that you wont be able to see the image stabilization at work, but wether it is in the Lens or the Body shouldn't matter as they both work effectively, its just very reassuring when its on the lens because when it is turned on you can see the effect in the view finder.
hope that helps.
Minyahil 3 years ago
There's pros and cons for each, Optical Stabilisation is arguably more effective because it can be matched to the lens (ie a big tele lens needs a different solution a shorter one), but more expensive since you have to buy the IS again every time you buy a new lens instead of just once, as with in-camera IS. But I think any differences are subtle and marginal and not worth agonising over.
WhatDigitalCamera 3 years ago