Added: 4 years ago
From: artynz
Views: 5,933
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (20)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • at 0:32 you can see jupiter's pole censored. There is light coming out from there, watch the cassini jupiter pole video to see that light without a patch.

  • is that a birth mark at ;20?

  • If you want to see harmonics and cymatics on a planetary scale, just check out the hexagon on Saturn's north pole, it's very obvious to those who are familiar with the geometries of cymatics.

  • Yes, I thought that I mentioned Saturn's hexagon also. I certainly intended to.

  • So Jupiter is ringing like a giant bell. Could this be why the planet emits strange sounding Electromagnetic waves that some say when amplified and turned into audio sound like spooky, ghostly, quire music?

  • Yes. All planets have music related to dimensions. The earth has the Schumann resonance at about 7.6 Hz plus harmonics.

    Jupiter's fundamental oscillation at the surface would be 1.50 Hz and harmonics of that. The 72nd harmonic should therefore be about 108 Hz if totally electrical.

    For cloud motions though, there would be much lower frequency waves also depending on sound propagation in the atmosphere.

  • do you think harmonic can be used a way to power a ship like a wave can push ships

  • Potentially I think so. I have deliberately avoided research into this area because we do not need more energy. We destroy our environment with excess energy use.

  • wasn't there a probe sent to jupiter some years ago that sent back video of the inside of the planet.

  • There was one that dropped into the atmosphere and measured stuff as it went down. Not sure there is much to see inside there (maybe some lightning?) but maybe it did gas analysis and pressure etc.

  • Not sure I understand what you mean here. Your assumption does not sound logically bases. Alternative energy is usually regarded as beneficial in general.

  • You are right. However no-one thinks about the result of using excessive amounts of energy. I observe that humans have a propensity to only think of the intended results of their actions and don't consider all the other unintended side-effects. That is why medicine, agriculture, transport, and many other things, have terrible side effects.

  • Yes however I don't believe in self enforced ignorance and limitation. Take for example nuclear power. As safe as it is and a solution to carbon dioxide emitions we fear it so we continue to dump tons of CO2 into the atomosphere as we are unwilling to surrender our standard of living, It is a self enforced ignorance that caues people to fear nuclear energy, not based on substance. If it was the French should have three heads and six eyeballs.

  • I am still skeptical about nuclear energy. There is the question of long lived waste products.

  • So what is the question?

    We know we have to store it. Underground in non-siesmic locations. Like Yukka mountain. There it will remain for 1500 years or as long a nessessary. We allready know this.

  • @Neillil411

    Or, to avoid contamination of the environment as much as possible, launch it to the Sun on rockets fueled by liquid hydrogen. The nuclear waste is safely disposed of and with little to no harm to the planet. The waste eventually, perhaps after billions of years dispersed in a star, become cosmic dust and eventually become nuclear fuel for another planet yet to form.

  • @3DPlanets 1.8% of all space launches results in a failure, usually catastrophic.

    You really want a sounding rocket packed with hazardous & radioactive waste to explode in the upper atmosphere?

  • @ganymedeIV4

    Carry the rockets on high-altitude planes, launching them like NASA's Pegasus rocket or Virgin Galactic's SpaceShipOne. Problem solved.

  • @3DPlanets how did that solve the problem? your still using a rocket that can explode, you just started higher up in the atmosphere.

    Wouldn't you rather develop the J.E.T reactor and be done with nuclear fuel altogether?

  • @ganymedeIV4

    Can =/= will.

  • The harmonic clouds, particularly at 1.38, look like Rossby Wave Turbulence. Is your theory compatible with Rossby wave turbulence or is it an alternative?

    Rossby-wave turbulence in a rapidly rotating sphere. N Schaeffer, P Cardin - NONLINEAR PROCESSES IN GEOPHYSICS, 2005

    Note Fig 4.

    Also, Peter L., 2001. Resonant Rossby Waves and the Swinging Spring. Bull. Amer. Met. Soc., 84, 605-616. is a good introduction to Rossby waves, resonance and harmonics.

  • I had not heard of Rossby wave turbulence before. BTW, there is no article on it in wikipedia. It seems to me that it explains large structures from small. In that case harmonics theory is going the other way, explaining small structures from large.

  • Excellent theory... Nice find...

Loading...
Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more