No 'villain' can approach the text wanting to be a Villain. If this is the case, he comes out boring and contrived like this one did. Not too mention, there is little to no service done to the script. If you read Edmund's speech, this on in particular, there are direct places where Shakespeare dictates how the actor should be approaching the text. Like John Barton says, the tools to form the speech are given to the actor by Shakespeare; it is up to the actor to recognize and use them.
Boring. Edmund doesn't see himself as a villain, he is merely doing what he thinks is right in order to get what he believes he deserves: civil rights. I should empathize with Edmund, not view him as a generic, plotting villain. Also, Shakespeare is all about discovering the thought word by word, this actor delivers the speech as if he has thought out everything he is going to say ahead of time. This is toward the purpose of being "cool", which is in no way unique or an interesting choice.
I remember watching this film adaptation in English and having a huge grin on my face whenever he came on. Such a good English accent though. I had no idea he was American until I read the comments.
Breathtaking performance. Is it wrong that I kind of want him to win just so I can hear talk. Really sexy villain. He would be great as the villain Cymbeline.
Whilst I have seen this production in it's entireity,and quite liked Edmund, I must say that this speech is a tad...bland. It's kinda emotionless- even a bit more sarcasm would be appreciated
First and foremost... WOW. Philip Winchester's performance as Edmund in this monologue is the most moving and sexually charged delivery a Shakespearean rendition has ever seen. Note the way he draws out the final consonant with such longing and power in words like 'wake' and 'legitimate.' It is awe inspiring. I know I'm not alone in thinking this.
Philip is truly amazing! And just like everyone else I would never guess he was American. The accent was flawless and the emotion in he eyes was fantastic. I cried when Crusoe was cancelled :'(
I haven't seen this adaptation (I missed it first time round) and was curious enough to look at clips on YouTube - while others have piqued my interest, this one has left me cold. It follows a similar reading that Kenneth Brannagh directed in the 80's, too foppish for me. If you want to see Edmund with a nasty streak and this speech delivered with some self-justified venom, check out the 1982 Jonathan Miller with Michael Kitchen playing the role - the outfits are a little Blackadder II, but...!!
I would say this was alot more relevant to the actor Philip and not Edmund. as for this being the best version on youtube, once again I'd completely disagree. As ukdeejay said Michael Kitchen's is considerably better.
I couldn't agree more. He is very good. Just notice the accent! Where have you ever seen an american actor dominating a perfectly convincing British accent so damn well?? I think I can say it is unprecedented. Well done, Mr Winchester. I definitely want to see more of him!
I actually wasn't a big fan of the show, even though I loved most of the actors in it! Unfortunately, it is possible to have a great cast and still botch things a little... I only saw it for Philip Winchester, and the snippets we got of Sean Bean... And they certainly didn't disappoint. ;)
You're so right about the accent. I was convinced he was from England, I never even thought otherwise. Then, when I looked up a bio of him and it said he was from America, I actually thought it was lying to me. =] Most people slip up at least once or twice with accents, but his is just flawless.
His British accent is good and so is his rendition of the monologue; however, a contemporary British accent for Shakespeare is no more historically accurate than an American midwestern one. Neither accents nor language or, really anything else for that matter, are static.
On the other hand, perhaps the other actors in this production are British and his accent was required for continuity's sake?
@hwuoahc thought he was absolutely brilliant too, but no surprise that he can speak with a perfect english voice as he trained at LAMDA, one of london's most prestigious drama schools.
No 'villain' can approach the text wanting to be a Villain. If this is the case, he comes out boring and contrived like this one did. Not too mention, there is little to no service done to the script. If you read Edmund's speech, this on in particular, there are direct places where Shakespeare dictates how the actor should be approaching the text. Like John Barton says, the tools to form the speech are given to the actor by Shakespeare; it is up to the actor to recognize and use them.
SpaceVisionTV 1 month ago 2
Boring. Edmund doesn't see himself as a villain, he is merely doing what he thinks is right in order to get what he believes he deserves: civil rights. I should empathize with Edmund, not view him as a generic, plotting villain. Also, Shakespeare is all about discovering the thought word by word, this actor delivers the speech as if he has thought out everything he is going to say ahead of time. This is toward the purpose of being "cool", which is in no way unique or an interesting choice.
CymbalRush 1 month ago 2
I remember watching this film adaptation in English and having a huge grin on my face whenever he came on. Such a good English accent though. I had no idea he was American until I read the comments.
TinselFairy 6 months ago
Breathtaking performance. Is it wrong that I kind of want him to win just so I can hear talk. Really sexy villain. He would be great as the villain Cymbeline.
mmgringoire2 6 months ago
so attractive
loreney65 8 months ago
I haven't seen any other versions to compare it too, but he's certainly a very pretty Edmund, which helps... :P
Meadowgirl1901 11 months ago
I love how he has that grin on his face of pure mischef! Brilliant!
rloveruns 1 year ago 3
Whilst I have seen this production in it's entireity,and quite liked Edmund, I must say that this speech is a tad...bland. It's kinda emotionless- even a bit more sarcasm would be appreciated
SleepyChocolateNinja 1 year ago
Just stopping by for my daily dose of Winchester. Once again, awestruck.
banjoteeth 1 year ago 2
@banjoteeth well put!
chocotier 2 weeks ago
Just viewed this once again and, once again, incredible.
banjoteeth 1 year ago
So bad. Boring and unoriginal.
sawblade5089 1 year ago
First and foremost... WOW. Philip Winchester's performance as Edmund in this monologue is the most moving and sexually charged delivery a Shakespearean rendition has ever seen. Note the way he draws out the final consonant with such longing and power in words like 'wake' and 'legitimate.' It is awe inspiring. I know I'm not alone in thinking this.
banjoteeth 1 year ago
Philip is truly amazing! And just like everyone else I would never guess he was American. The accent was flawless and the emotion in he eyes was fantastic. I cried when Crusoe was cancelled :'(
HowlandGirlsStudios 1 year ago
Hard to believe this guy is American.
KnightofDuroch 2 years ago
I haven't seen this adaptation (I missed it first time round) and was curious enough to look at clips on YouTube - while others have piqued my interest, this one has left me cold. It follows a similar reading that Kenneth Brannagh directed in the 80's, too foppish for me. If you want to see Edmund with a nasty streak and this speech delivered with some self-justified venom, check out the 1982 Jonathan Miller with Michael Kitchen playing the role - the outfits are a little Blackadder II, but...!!
ukdeejay 2 years ago
"check out the 1982 Jonathan Miller with Michael Kitchen playing the role - the outfits are a little Blackadder II, but...!!"
I suspect it's the other way around. That is, I think Blackadder II is specifically riffing on that particular production of Lear.
hbobrien 2 years ago
Best version of the monologue on youtube. really inspirational and relevant to Edmund and not the actor
tischeno2 2 years ago 5
I would say this was alot more relevant to the actor Philip and not Edmund. as for this being the best version on youtube, once again I'd completely disagree. As ukdeejay said Michael Kitchen's is considerably better.
heman86 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
he says the last line really gay lol
baileyboy12345678910 2 years ago
Wonderfulllllllllll work!
Mateezy 2 years ago
favorite line of life now! "Now gods! Stand up for bastards!" just makes me giggle...this performance is FANTASTIC! totally swoon worthy
Nurisbaby 2 years ago
You are so right...Philip Winchester definitely does not get enough attention!!!
+ King Lear rocks my socks. *nods*
MegGem1 2 years ago 2
I couldn't agree more. He is very good. Just notice the accent! Where have you ever seen an american actor dominating a perfectly convincing British accent so damn well?? I think I can say it is unprecedented. Well done, Mr Winchester. I definitely want to see more of him!
hwuoahc 2 years ago 10
YES YES YES...Too bad "Crusoe" was canceled...fantastic show as well!!
MegGem1 2 years ago
I actually wasn't a big fan of the show, even though I loved most of the actors in it! Unfortunately, it is possible to have a great cast and still botch things a little... I only saw it for Philip Winchester, and the snippets we got of Sean Bean... And they certainly didn't disappoint. ;)
hwuoahc 2 years ago
I thought it was a pretty good show, considering the fact that they kept it clean, haha! It's a step above the rest in terms of that.
Philip Winchester (or Philly Winny as I call him) was pretty darned great in it...especially the parts where he just *had* to take his shirt off...:P
And Sean Bean was awesome as well. :) :)
MegGem1 2 years ago
You're so right about the accent. I was convinced he was from England, I never even thought otherwise. Then, when I looked up a bio of him and it said he was from America, I actually thought it was lying to me. =] Most people slip up at least once or twice with accents, but his is just flawless.
WildQueenie 2 years ago
@WildQueenie
His British accent is good and so is his rendition of the monologue; however, a contemporary British accent for Shakespeare is no more historically accurate than an American midwestern one. Neither accents nor language or, really anything else for that matter, are static.
On the other hand, perhaps the other actors in this production are British and his accent was required for continuity's sake?
joshchopin 1 year ago
@hwuoahc thought he was absolutely brilliant too, but no surprise that he can speak with a perfect english voice as he trained at LAMDA, one of london's most prestigious drama schools.
thefletchishere 3 months ago