Added: 3 years ago
From: blackhistorychannel
Views: 8,146
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (179)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • you dont die hiv or aids, you die from normal diseases, your antibodies are low,thats all.

    the hiv story is to sell the vaccines, voila, all in one sentence

  • this woman is crazy...nothing in the medical profession is 100% and they do not say the test is a predictor of if you are to get AIDS...it is folks like this...look at her ethnicity...that are working to wipe out the black community...YOU NEED TO KNOW YOUR STATUS AND IF YOU THINK YOU DON'T THAN YOU ARE THE FOOL..I worked in the field of HIV/AIDS for twenty years and they also tell you that you can get a false positive result but the RNA test is fail proof...

  • for all people especially poor people dont take no test. For black or melanated people, DO NOT GIVE BLOOD. They need your blood to survive for the future. 2012 -2017 the world will change big time, We have the cure in our blood to cure anything on earth. They give you disease when you take the medicine. just like swine flu. do not take no pharmucutical drugs. cdc is controlling the population. wake up.,

  • it's the white male that is thee aids carrier...jest like who originated small pox?, the bubonic plague ?, & eats bloody rare meats, which carry virusus through the blood pathlogens?....

    plus who cheats more on their pale-wives, durring their 3rd world travels, so the euro-pee-on can sleep with refugee hookers & young boys ???

    the white male is the aids carrier!

  • look at the guy with lizard eyes at 3:47 and 4:00

  • looooooooooooooooooooooool your video suckj man it is all lies and bull shiiiiiit

    and this woman dying from hiv just like you loooooooooooool

    when you becom a doctor ?

    when you becom CDC ?

    WHEN YOU BECOME THE WORLD LABS ?

    GEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEET A LIFE

  • @ra3d4e Go look at the disclaimer put there by the manufacturers. It's on my channle right under the Pope. Also...that's Kary Mullis in the 2nd part you idiot. He won the Nobel Prize for inventing the PCR

  • looooooooooooooooooooooool your video suckj man it is all lies and bull shiiiiiit

    and this woman dying from hiv just like you

  • This woman looks like a corpse that's been made to talk.

  • @SilvaSkaduwee Hahaha. Yeah. She sure does.

  • Go see this video....on youtube

    Nobel Laureate Montagnier: HIV Can Be Cleared Naturally - House of Numbers

    He admits that "hiv' won't make healthy people sick and that immune problems can be treated with nutrition. He slams the drugs and vaccines a being about profit not health.

    Pass it on.

  • koolaid

    yeah thanx i havew seen that and som :)

    def diet is the key to prevention!

  • Cool, ;)

    glad it was unnecessary

  • STOP PRESS!! STOP PRESS!!

    Check these PEER-REVIEWED articles:

    Koolaid et al (2009) No bog standard for HIV: AIDS testing is crap. J Scatological Reasearch 1: 1-2

    Koolaid et al (1801) False HIV positive results in persistent and runny (verbal) diarhhoea. Scatological Reviews 1: 1-98

    Annie64 (1962) Shit enough and the public will believe the shit. Scatology Today 1: 1-9

  • Roflol.

  • Comment removed

  • Are you a denialist or do you believe that HIV was deliberately made? I get confused by your nutcaes.

  • Hm! Seems like you are a denialist.

  • Ah kookaid trick number 2. Select outdated studies and quotes, and pretend they are the state of the science.

    "Life expectancy of individuals on combination antiretroviral therapy in high-income countries: a collaborative analysis of 14 cohort studies" The Lancet, Volume 372, Issue 9635, Pages 293 - 299, 26 July 2008

    Is pretty clear. HAART Is increasing life spans.

  • "Life expectancy at age 20 years increased from 36·1 (SE 0·6) years to 49·4 (0·5) years."

    "Life expectancy in HIV-infected patients treated with combination antiretroviral therapy increased between 1996 and 2005"

  • And with that, I shall retire. I know that within seconds kookaid will be here and spam me off the page. It is part of her illness. Of course she will copy paste.

  • Well kookaid you obviously have your entire life to waste on lying to people. You will go to your death bed knowing you did nothing but evil in your life.

    Live with it.

    I don't have time to waste on scum like you. I am too busy saving lives.

  • Science... like your claim "Don't leave out that there is NO increase in life span anyway.."

    "The crude death rate was 0.24 event/person-year among patients taking HAART and 0.88 event/person-year among those not taking HAART" AIM July 2001, Volume 135 Issue 1, pp 17-26

    If you don't die kookaid, you are living longer. That is an increase in life span.

  • the reason kookaid is desperately spamming me off the page, and lurking here so she can post within seconds after I do is because she made the mistake of referring to a study that debunks several of her claims.

    I can only assume she did that because she is too dumb to read the study & understand it.

    And kookaid, I am not marking you spam. The system does that automatically when you copy paste. So you need to start coming up with new lines of bullshit.

  • Hit show spam...why NOT see what the shill want sooo desperately to be censored?

    ;)

  • Inflammatory reactions involving opportunistic infections, AIDS-associated malignant conditions, and other noninfectious diseases have recently been described in patients infected with HIV-1. These conditions often appeared shortly after the introduction of HAART

    Ann Intern Med. 2000 Sep 19;133(6):447-54

    — DeSimone JA, et al, Aids Researchers

    Rethinkaids com quotes section

  • Combination drug therapy, or the triple-drug cocktailoften provokes severe side effects These drugs are as dangerous as chemotherapy, warned Dr. James Kahn, UCSF associate professor of medicine

    — Science Daily, Sep 4, 2001

  • Risk of progressing to severe immunodeficiency [abnormal CD4 cell counts] was 64% higher [in this group of HIV-positive European children, mostly with mothers involved with intravenous drugs] when receiving ART [Anti-Retroviral Therapy]

    Pediatrics. 2001 Jul;108(1):116-22

    — The European Collaborative Study

  • Google...20 Unanswerable Questions for AIDS Inc.

    20. Why have improvements in "virological responses" ("viral load" and CD4 counts) to HAART NOT translated into decreased clinical progression to AIDS and death (31)?

    Links to the PEER REVIEWED studies are included in the article.

  • THIS is the study in question

    1. May, MT et al, 2006. "HIV treatment response and prognosis in Europe and North America in the first decade of highly active antiretroviral therapy: a collaborative analysis", Lancet. 2006 Aug 5;368(9534):427-8,

    NOT the one the shill posted

  • ccr5cxcr4 aka Humanshot aka Humanshot1 aka humanshot2 aka Humanshot etc etc aka Conotoxin aka Ilfousdateguole aka Travian College etc etc is all the same pharma shill troll boy. I have the list of his shill accounts on my channel and SOME of the videos he pulls his lies and spamming campaigns on.

    He does it EVERYWHERE he goes to EVERY one who disagrees with him.

  • AIDS INC...on youtube is CLASSIC shill work. Not the video...scroll through comments. It's hilarious. The shill...posting under Ilfousdetaguole about 4 months ago actually accuses ME of having a million shill accounts and spamming HIM

    except who is getting spammed and who is giving himself applause? DUH! Lmao

    Humanshot1 also makes a rare appearance too. The idiot can't keep track of all his accounts

  • HIV-1 RNA was NOT prognostic for mortality

    Prognosis of HIV-1-infected patients up to 5 years after initiation of HAART: collaborative analysis of prospective studies. AIDS. 2007 May 31;21(9):1185-97.

    Rethinkaids com quotes on tests section

  • patient's prognostic data at time of starting ART:

    Age in years: 16 to 29 30 to 39 40 to 49 50 or over

    CD4 cell count: under 25 25-49 50-99 100-199 200-349 350 or over

    HIV-1 RNA copies/ml: under 100,000 100,000 or over

    CDC disease stage: A or B C

    HIV transmission through injection drug use: yes no

    kookaid. Staring at the sun going blind.

  • Google...20 Unanswerable Questions for AIDS Inc.

    11. Why are very high "viral loads" found in HIV-negative individuals? (19-21)

    20. Why have improvements in "virological responses" ("viral load" and CD4 counts) to HAART not translated into decreased clinical progression to AIDS and death (31)?

    direct links to the studies are included in the article

  • And kookaid why would treating a "fictitious virus" with "deadly drugs" improve mortality? Durrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr.

  • google...A Cure for US AIDS Travel to Canada

    .... Corroborating these drug risks, a recent study by Danish health authorities was published in the Annals of Internal Medicine and reviewed all those HIV+ in Denmark. This study found that 25% refused the offered antiHIV regimens but nevertheless had the lowest mortality rates, with projected life expectancies close to the average Dane, despite being HIV+.

  • Prognosis of HIV-1-infected patients up to 5 years after initiation of HAART: collaborative analysis of prospective studies. AIDS. 2007 May 31;21(9):1185-97.

    ROFLOL! All that study shows is that HAART Is effective! Imagine that. Prognosis for mortality improves when you treat the disease...

    "The CD4 cell count at initiation was the dominant prognostic factor in patients starting HAART."

    "Baseline HIV-1 viral load was associated with a higher probability of progression"

  • In most people, the (antiretroviral) drugs cause a sharp fall in viral load. However, some patients do not experience such an effect, and these people are far more likely to develop AIDS or to die. This fact in itself very strongly suggests that HIV causes AIDS.

  • Yep. Kookaid lurking and spamming. Can't let anyone else get a word in edgewise because the science is so clear.

    She is a glassy eyed cultist.

  • In a European study of babies born to HIV-positive women, none of those who tested negative developed AIDS, compared to 30% of those who tested positive. By their first birthday, 17% of the HIV-positive babies had died.73 A similar study in Uganda found that more than half of HIV-positive babies died before their second birthdays, compared to one sixth of those who were HIV-negative.74

  • Alternative theories cannot explain why HIV tests should be so effective at predicting illness and death in so many diverse groups of people from all parts of the world.

    It is even possible to predict the likelihood that someone will soon develop AIDS by measuring the amount of HIV in their blood, which is known as "viral load". Such measurements can be made using PCR, branched-DNA signal-amplification (bDNA) or quantitative microculture techniques.

  • For example, the table below - based on a long term study of 1,604 patients - illustrates just how useful bDNA forecasts can be:75

    Viral load (RNA copies per millilitre of blood plasma) /Proportion of patients developing AIDS within six years :

    less than 500 5.4%

    501-3,000 16.6%

    3,001-10,000 31.7%

    10,001-30,000 55.2%

    more than 30,000 80.0%

  • Just thought you should know kookaid spammed you off the page with her typical copy paste bullshit.

  • In the UK between 1979 and 1992, death rates increased massively among HIV-positive haemophiliacs, but remained unchanged among the rest.71 Similar research in the USA found that HIV-positive haemophiliacs were 11 times more likely to die over a ten-year period, compared with those who tested negative.72

  • A mountain of evidence shows that much can be predicted from a positive test result. For example:

    Around half of people develop AIDS-defining conditions within 10 years of HIV infection, if they don't take antiretroviral drugs. Only a few do not develop AIDS within 20 years

    During a 16-year, large-scale monitoring study of homosexual and bisexual men in the US, 60% of HIV-positives died compared with 2.3% of HIV-negatives.70

  • It was less than a minute from my post until kookaid had spammed my comments. I applaud your efforts to inform her, but as you can see, she has no interest in peer reviewed science.

  • Why before an AIDS epidemic breaks out in one country we always observe the spreading of HIV amongst the population?Why wherever HIV is rare,AIDS cases are few and wherever HIV is widespread we observe many cases of AIDS?

  • Lol...oh NO you don't. The hetero aids epidemic was cancelled last summer (except for black people) Even in BRAZIL! Brazil has 1 MILLION new cases of syphilis EVERY year!

    June 2008

    Dr. Kevin de Cock of the World Health Organization: "[T]here will be no generalised epidemic of Aids in the heterosexual population outside Africa."

    google

    There Will Be No Heterosexual AIDS Epidemic, Experts Admit

  • The results of the largest and longest study of hetero transmission are included in the article along with some studies of Tiajuana, Tel Aviv and African hookers and can also be found here...'The Padian Waffle" and Helpforhiv com has the direct link to the study in question

    And then there's this article...EPIDEMIOLOGICAL EVIDENCE AGAINST HETEROSEXUAL TRANSMISSION OF HIV AND AGAINST PREVENTION-CAMPAIGNS

  • Results of the following studies are presented:

    1. Anonymous unlinked testing of blood from the umbilical cord

    2. Blood donors in Germany

    3. Military conscripts in Austria

    4. Prostitutes in Europe

    5. Thailand (STD's and HIV)

    6. Back-calculation of HIV-incidence in Germany

    7. Condoms sold in Germany

    #7 is very interesting. Germans do not like condoms. Germans do not buy condoms. Sales went from 2 per person per year to 2.3 per person per year.

    No hiv epidemic there either.

  • google the evidence that hiv causes aids

    Answer this smart guy

    If hiv does not cause AIDS

    how come when we infect a T cell culture with HIV we see the HIV invade and repliicate in those cells and then those very cells die?Why the very same culture does fine if it is not infeceted with HIV?Why antiretrovirals prevent the onset of AIDS if they manage ti reduce the HIV viral load in a HIV + person?

  • lol...You DON"T..Google...20 Unanswerable Questions for AIDS Inc.

    6. Why do "viral load", CD4 counts, and culturable virus have almost no correlation with each other (13, 14)?

    18. Why are exactly the same cells that HIV is said to kill in vivo not killed in vitro where productively infected cultures continue to produce 1000s of infectious particles per day for use in the various "AIDS tests" and are not protected by antibodies or "antiretroviral" drugs (29)?

  • Coming at it from another point of view, AIDS onset at high CD4+ cell levels is associated with high HIV load. AIDS research and human retroviruses 16(2):103-7, 2000 Jan 20

    The higher viral load at relatively high CD4+ cell levels in men who subsequently developed AIDS within 6 months supports the hypothesis that elevated levels of HIV precede CD4+ decline and are the major factor in determining risk of AIDS even at high levels of CD4+ cell levels.

  • "Don't leave out that there is NO increase in life span anyway.." Another kookaid lie easily debunked. And she calls OTHER people liars. She is pathological.

    "The crude death rate was 0.24 event/person-year among patients taking HAART and 0.88 event/person-year among those not taking HAART" AIM July 2001, Volume 135 Issue 1, pp 17-26

    For kookaid, who obviously cannot understand scientific documents. Not dying means you live longer.

  • Karen Mullis might be a nobel laurete but he has NEVER PERFORMED ORIGINAL RESEARCH ON HIV AND AIDS something he has in common with Duesberg the other famous denialist.

    I prefer to listen to people who have worked with the HIV in the lab and with AIDS patiens.

  • The data that confirm that HIV causes AIDS are contained in a number of papers and they come from different fields like epidimiology,virology,patholog­y,clinical studies.Unfortunately for you those data confirm that HIV causes AIDS.

  • Um...the LATEST from Italy?

    Google...Official Italian data: no causal connection between HIV and AIDS

  • Um...YES he has you liar. Go check MULLIS in my favorites. He talks about working on an hiv project there.

  • "There are not sufficient enough data to understand the properties of HIV because the scientific literature is nothing more than opinions, poorly conducted studies and reviews of poorly conducted studies."

    — Dr. Howard Urnovitz, PhD, Microbiologist and Immunologist, Science Director, Chronic Illness Research Foundation, co-founder and CEO, Chronix Biomedical. Dr. Urnovitzs team developed the only FDA-licensed urine-based diagnostic test for antibodies to HIV.

    Rethinkaids com quotes

  • DID Howard ever performed original research on HIV?Did he EVER worked with HIV in the lab in vitro?Did he treat AIDS patients?

  • I LIE when I say that Mullis NEVER EVER EVER WORKED with HIV?

    Really?Well unfortunately for you,Mullis actually never worked with HIV.He is also not a virologist but a biochemist.Furthemore since we begun talking about Nobles Montagnier which discovered the HIV was awarded a NOBEL for his discovery.(that is the HIV discovery).

  • "HAART, was introduced in the care of children around 1995 in North America and Western Europe. Within a year or two the effect was clear to all physicians and nurses involved, the dying stopped. The attrition of the cohort of infected children by irreversible opportunistic infection and death ceased, and almost all who were alive, in whatever state of health, at the

    beginning of HAART, remain alive." CICE Hiroshima University, JICE , Vol.10 No.1 (2007) pp.101 - 113

  • I recommend people hit show spam if you're looking at comments. Why not see what the shill wants censored?

    ;)

  • More kookshit. Quote from another study where they did not isolate HIV and imply that means that no-one else has. These people did (along with a few 1000 other studies)

    Simultaneous isolation of HIV-1 and HIV-2 from an AIDS patient., Lancet. 1988 Dec 17;2(8625):1389-91

    Phenotypic variations and switches in HIV isolated from the blood and the gastrointestinal tissues of patients with HIV-1 infection, Journal of Medical Virology, Volume 52 Issue 1, Pages 31 - 34, 1998

  • HIV never isolated from AIDS patients? Bullshit. 20 years behind again. Happens every day:

    Simultaneous isolation of HIV-1 and HIV-2 from an AIDS patient., Lancet. 1988 Dec 17;2(8625):1389-91

    Phenotypic variations and switches in HIV isolated from the blood and the gastrointestinal tissues of patients with HIV-1 infection, Journal of Medical Virology, Volume 52 Issue 1, Pages 31 - 34, 1998

  • Well I am a biotechnologist and the things you claim about

    1)hiv not been isolated

    2)hiv not causing aids

    3)antiretrovirals not working

    4)hiv tests not working ARE PURE SHIT.

    Pray tell what are YOUR QUALIFICATIONS ?Where did you graduate from?

  • what are your credentials mykoolaid?What kind of degree do you have?

  • typical kookaid. Can't address the science, so attack the person. And anyone who provides peer reviewed science proving her a bullshitter is automatically a shill.

    I am honored to keep company with scientists and doctors that she labels shills.

  • kookaid, living decades in the past. Of course HIV has been isolated from patients and is done routinely now in labs.

    "Genotypic and phenotypic characterization of HIV-1 isolated from patients" Antiviral Res. 1995 Oct;28(2):133-46

    "Active cAMP-dependent Protein Kinase Incorporated within Highly Purified HIV-1 Particles Is Required for Viral Infectivity and Interacts with Viral Capsid Protein"

    Isolated, and purified. Long ago. Not even very hard to do.

  • Use cold pressed organic virgin coconut oil, as a lubricant and that will destroy HIV, and many other STDs. This is verified by scientific study, w w w . lauric . org / clinical . html, w w w . coconutoil . com / viruses . htm & w w w . coconutoil . com / hiv . htm These are studies that were and are being conducted by independent researches with no benefit to gain from his information. This is not research you will ever learn about from the MSM. Read & don't let fear mongering limit your life

  • i think it's still better to get tested, there's not really a downside. if it tests positive either you have aids or another transferable disease, so it's best you abstain from sex anyways. it'd probably be smarter to get tested multiple times, so the temporary things that can cause the false positives wont affect it.

  • The downside is you get treated like a social leper and will be pressured togo on toxic immusuppressive drig cocktails.

    Do you not understand? The "hiv tests" do NOT test for "hiv"

    They are NONspecific antibody tests and antibodies cross react all the time. Without the gold standard it's IMPOSSIBLE to make a specific diagnosis.

    Might be flu, might be pregnancy, might be herpes, might be TB, might be x 70

    Helpforhiv com has the list and references

  • that's what i'm saying, it'd still be safer to not have sex under any of those conditions anyway, so the risks are minimal. you can just get tested again later to see if it was a temporary condition. take a pregnancy test beforehand. people can go 6 months without sex especially if they have a high chance of having some sort of STD

  • Why take a test with no standards? A spelling test has standards.

  • You do have a point though. The tests are ok for a random test of general health. That's what they were originally intended for. Google...

    Why the HIV Tests Can't Tell You Whether You Have HIV

    By Dr. Rodney Richards who worked on the development of the first "hiv tests". Who better to go to about the tests than the scientist who worked on them? It's available at the HEALTORONTO site

  • Bulshit and that comes from a biotechnologist.Antibody tests are 98% accurate.And if you do not trust antibodies try PCR which detects the viral RNA.And if you want to be even more accurate try a virus culture.

  • No, using and antibody test to confirm an antibody test is like using a bible to "confirm' a bible. You have no independent means of verifying those results.

    "The AMPLICOR HIV-1 MONITOR Test is not intended to be used as a screening test for HIV or as a diagnostic test to confirm the presence of HIV infection. "

    I have the link direct to the disclaimer at my channel.

  • "In a letter to the [U.S.] Department of Health and Human Services last year, I suggested that their position that HIV is the sole cause of AIDS is substantially based on scientists studying complex mixtures of biological fluids with unknown numbers of regulatory genes and concluding that one big structural gene, HIV, is causing the syndrome. This is medical incompetence at its worst."

  • "There are not sufficient enough data to understand the properties of HIV because the scientific literature is nothing more than opinions, poorly conducted studies and reviews of poorly conducted studies.

    — Dr. Howard Urnovitz, PhD, Microbiologist and Immunologist, Science Director, Chronic Illness Research Foundation, co-founder and CEO, Chronix Biomedical. Dr. Urnovitzs team developed the only FDA-licensed urine-based diagnostic test for antibodies to HIV.

    Rethinkaids com quotes section

  • I had no idea that structural genes come with a full viral envelope.

  • The HIV-1 PCR assay was designed to monitor HIV therapy, not to diagnose HIV infectionIn patients (like ours) with a low prior probability of disease, almost all positive test results are false positive. (False Positive HIV Diagnosis b HIV-1 Plasma Viral Load Testing. Ann Intern Med, 1999.)

    Also see...20 Unanswerable Questions for AIDS Inc.

    11. Why are very high "viral loads" found in HIV-negative individuals? (19-21)

  • PCR is not an antibody test

    Viral culture is not an antibody test.

  • I know PCR is not an antibody test. It is also not confirmation of the antibody tests. Google....."PCR FOR THE SO-CALLED MEASUREMENT OF HIV VIRAL LOAD"

    by..

    Etienne de Harven,..Emeritus Professor of Pathology, University of Toronto. He worked in electron microscopy primarily on the ultrastructure of retroviruses throughout his professional career of 25 years at the Sloan Kettering Institute in New York, and 13 years at the University of Toronto.

  • Also "viral culture" is no substitute for direct isolation.

  • Google..."HIV HAS NEVER BEEN ISOLATED FROM AIDS PATIENTS"

    &

    PURIFY? WHO NEEDS THAT? (SO SAYS ROBERT GALLO)

  • Do you have any idea what viral culture means?It means bringing the viruses which are contained in speciments from patients in direct contact with their host cells thus allowing to those viruses to invade those cells reproduce and produce a large number of viral particles that can be detected more easily than a single virus.

  • Creating something in a petri dish which did NOT exist in the patient does not impress me.

    Get yourself some scientifically valid tests and get back to me.

  • Creating something in a petri dish?CREATING?Culture is not "creating".Its allowing a living organism to reproduce by placing it in a proper inveroment.Whatever.You may believe HIV does not exist its your funeral.

  • An appeal to emotion? Will the dread virus of mass destruction smite me for questioning it?

    Sorry but trying to implant phobias in me to prevent me asking questions does not work.

  • No not an appeal to emotion.I am just giving up.

  • 3) Serological tests for so-called HIV seropositivity, being based on the same non specific markers, also lack specificity and do not demonstrate any HIV infectious process.

    4) Public credulity is abused by the constant publication of HIV images that all derive from electron microscopy of laboratory cell cultures, and NEVER derive directly from AIDS patients.

    December 8, 2003, address to European Parliament Conference on AIDS in Africa, Brussels

  • by..

    Etienne de Harven,..Emeritus Professor of Pathology, University of Toronto. He worked in electron microscopy primarily on the ultrastructure of retroviruses throughout his professional career of 25 years at the Sloan Kettering Institute in New York, and 13 years at the University of Toronto.

    Rethinkaids com quotes on aids section

  • I almost forgot his first point...

    1) HIV particles have never been demonstrated by electron microscopy in the blood stream of AIDS patients allegedly presenting with high viral load.

    December 8, 2003, address to European Parliament Conference on AIDS in Africa, Brussels

    Rethinkaids com

  • modern ELIZA tests are 98% accurate.The infection can be confirmed with even greater accuracy with PCR (which detects the viral RNA),with western blot which can detect the viral antigens like p24 and if you want to be even more certain with viral culture.One test may be wrong but several kinds of tests?very unlikely.

  • There is no point in discussing anything with kookaid. She is a cultist. And she sells quack therapies so she has a vested financial interest in misleading people about HIV. Check her other accounts annie46664 and oliviahadassah (among hundreds of others).

    She spends all day every day on youtube trying to gain customers, and mislead people from groups she hates (homosexuals, blacks, Jews).

    She is soulless.

  • Spontaneous generation, you mean? Or, a Frankenstein virus?

    I got to hand it to you, kooly babe, you beat even Big Brother as hilarious entertainment.

  • You can not be more direct than a viral culture!

  • The best proof that HIV causes AIDS is the fact that if antiretroviral drugs (drugs that prevent HIV from replicating) manage to reduce the HIV viral load in a HIV + patient then the development of full blown AIDS and death is prevented up to 80%.