KQED Spark - Anna Maltz

[aprilanryan]

whyyyyyyyyyy

[kgsz]

Ouch. Blurring outfit? That's so stupid :>

[naaaaf11]

تتتتتتتتتتتت



[danielzspace]

this is fucked up man who dresses their child ,like that, im pretty sure my mom didnt dress me like that and take pictures of me

[rebelwordz]

now thats art

[keesso9]

uhhh why did she put it on her kid this is wierd wtf

[ThamelasStormrage]

$2,453,732.26 in tax money was spent by the National Endowment for the Arts to produce this work of "art."

[Kullg4r]

Three words: what the fuck?

[chubbywater2]

no

[brianmorena]

Lol! They look comfortable...but why even bother wearing clothes if they are pretending to be nakid~!

[YManCyberDude]

I like the flies that kept grouping around the naughty bits...

[AdonBlackheart]

umm. i wonder if shes seen the furry fetish? this is jacked up.

[kionie1]

I want one of those boobie sweaters!!

[zuniga6412]

I think the whole thing is stupid.

[LiberalElitistMedia]

Was God blurring out the dirty parts?

[chip261]

2:00 its not blurred

[c1o2d3y]

@cjeb2003 "Not that they really have anything to offer the rest of the planet to begin with because they don't."

alright bro you guys can keep your tea & crumpets, we want hollywood, and our TV shows back

[cjeb2003]

@c1o2d3y LOL!!!! I'll take me tea and crumpets any day over that trash that you call television and Hollywood! Just remember where the Pinewood studios (where a majority of the greatest movies are made!) are located! Now, the other challenge, quite obviously, is finding a real American who has any real talent! That indeed is a very rare animal! LOL!!!!

[MrShtirlitz]

I can't get my eyes off the blurred parts!

[djmarkcotter]

why does furry "material" have to be blurred out? especially if children are wearing it? whose sinless souls are we protecting/ little old ladies?

[camrob99]

@djmarkcotter More importantly, why not be really cutting edge and due nude family fotos? And unless she's having people where the other gender's "skin" how is it "shaking up people's ideas about gender, etc."?

[SavandKev]

Hope they don't develop those pictures at walmart. :(...... Hope they throw away the camera and the suits... why god.........why

[blazetheblunt]

Stereotypes are canceled by these suits..Awesome idea. .....T.v,internet, Advertising. caused world hate... Well "how you look Matters" Thanks alot money hungrey society .

[TheAncientMind]

Our problem is allowing culture to develop our way of life and thats a problem we continue to make.

[tumbledon]

I agree..

[SavandKev]

Don't know what to say....

[aspiasu]

seems like a great idea

[AceDevilProductions]

Somewhat interesting, but I fail to see the point of it.

[joelybarrios]

whoa.

[TheCerealCruncher]

i would just go naked :)

[hugo2x]

that's just weird

[schwmp01]

What is wrong with people?

[3232James]

3 words... get a life

[blackrose8412]

Nudity to cover up nudity. Amazing.

Hey, let's just skip clothing altogether! Just cut out the middle man!

[CyndiLylyk]

If the adults want to do this...whateva! But when you put a child in the mix...not cool!

[tumbledon]

you have a child there seeing all that! I would be very uncomfortable...if I saw my parents putting on naked suits. And the made me put one on....I'm an artist...very open minded...But that is pushing it with the childs naked suit...

[ninjamatic5000]

No. If you were a child that age, I don't think you would care all that much. They seem to be having a good time

Young children don't care about nudity until we tell them that being nude is evil.

[soothsayer0]

people,

this is San Francisco. so there's your answer.

[cbautista51]

what is purpose?????

[nyxsushi]

Wait whats the point its either your naked or your wearing clothes???

[hellllomiss]

umm this is the weirdest thing i have seen all year long....and they actually like it

[bufprochi1]

bruno wore it

lol

[Sobersnowman]

These people are just overall weird, and I think it's a bad idea to bring the children into this. I mean I would have no problem if they did this as fully-consenting adults in their own home, but bringing the children into it because you believe its a good idea isn't the best reason to justify it.

[munciesORIGINAL]

why exactly are the privates blurred out?

but the boobs are not?

[GonPolitics]

well in europe boobs aren't regarded as privates

[darthguy3]

what's with the censor? This is all about nudity and still they don't want it to contain nudity? Geez...

[TinyVessels00]

Everyone is naked under their clothes.

[ljungren13]

adam and eve white? i doubt that

[cjeb2003]

@ljungren13 Why?

[cecilygreenbean]

I think that's great! We're all born naked.

[Hippototproductions]

epic fail

[cannibalsaint]

Fail.

[claudalaud]

"it's about being with people, it's about having a good time"

really? really.

[cursedweirdo]

super funny. Nice one!

[omgitskumako]

why did they censor the man suit :S?

i mean, then they should censor the woman suit as well :S..

[pidner]

What the deal,why not just go naked if you like the look and save some doe.

[MsIMListening2U]

They look so snuggly warm.

[patriciaredstone]

Love it! "a different skin" ... very appropriate. I wish they hadn't blotted out the crotches - it's just fabric!

[nitdkim]

there should be option of negative stars...

[Thelovelychristinaa]

LMFAO

my Halloween costume!

[L0VESC]

freakin' weird.

[nattecca]

WOHO GO SF!

[racheldeboerinmaui]

the amount of negativity against even the suggestion or reproduction of nudity on people is absolutely overwhelming. obviously we in the west have a huge issue with our bodies if it triggered this much hate comments. its a shame people hate their own bodies so much they are afraid of anything different or new examining it. no one yells bloody murder during halloween when we see men with huge penis costumes on hmmm?

[racheldeboerinmaui]

its called art people. they are actually clothed with just the fascimile of nudity on them. what is the big deal? its funny. our bodies are not evil or sinful. no one saw anyone naked because it was a knitted version of nudity.

[OweenaCo]

Such nagitive input. Personally I saw nothing wrong here. There will no child having trauma over this suit, he was having fun with it.

[shawnster172]

Well, It's cooler than a Snuggie.

[EIPtuningR32]

no doubt.lol

[sealio9]

fantastic how artful

[MrTunafillets]

I really need to stop accepting random youtube videos from ym friend.

[Burt0n1566]

wow...

[Shortyyyz]

this is weird

[oldvision]

It's sad at how ashamed humans are of their bodies.

[reefstudy]

Not all humans, just Americans.

[debbieswinyer]

Pretty cool!!!

[Grooveraider]

Well ofcourse, this is San Francisco !  One these days i'm moving there :P

[UserUnfriendly21]

......whaaat?

[5uspended4nimation]

Ya gotta love YouTubes " featured Videos" opening page . Christ

[caryallendavis]

just take your clothes off. Simple.

[wowwooter]

imop it was the suit you were born in and shouldn't be ashamed in wearing

[wastedchicks]

i don't get it

[rsmelser]

yea ok ,a fuzzy naked suit.. but why the kid?

[myY0UTUBEchanneI]

pixels?

[jidjid123]

lol!

[geojorge1369]

Get over yourselves!  What's your problem with a dipiction of the human body?

[KCHweed]

I just...I just...don't understand...what was the point of this? The suits defeat the purpose of wearing clothing, so it really has no purpose at all. I think? CONFUSED : /

Why does this woman think that these "suits" don't depict sexual subject matter (aka the definition of porn)? I mean just because it isn't outrightly sexual doesn't mean it isn't. Much like I would make a dog wear a dog suit, even though I can't see the real dog, I still see and visual and imagine a dog.

[sirayray]

I DONT UNDERSTAND.

[apol7lo]

There was an attempt to make us think about how we view nudity and try to get us to re-examine our attitudes. Imagine putting someone in prison for 3 years for showing off their genitals. But sadly, though it was a good effort, it will be lost on most who view this.

We prefer what we inherit rather than risk learning and growing. But do be warned, there is a price that is paid for being afraid to examine yourself.

[cclovesyoutoob]

It's a cute knitted Pajama.  Relax everyone.

[csatteson]

This would be a great SNL skit!

[MusicNeverDies18]

Ohemgee it totally would! We should write in and tell them to do this as a skit!

[Holret]

Ok, so the point of wearing clothes is to cover the privates so.. Why cover the privates to pretend they are not covered?

[juggalojeff]

What is the point, should just go nude for real, basically same difference

[tlambert]

Just in time for Halloween!

[TheGeordy]

BORING

[kittercat2]

i don't think that's rite that they blur out the guy down below but not the woman's top.

[jenerikuser]

ruined my day

[astanhope]

The fact that we Americans have to digitally blur CLOTH GENITALIA is embarrassing.

Save us from the image of the KNIT PEN1S, please!

[IFukdYourGirlfriend]

This is ridiculous.

[TexasTeaJane]

Hmm interesting lol

[banandababa]

Really really strange.......how do people come up with these things?!

[ninalapinta]

why did they blur out the penises? I miean...they were just knitted.

[aerockster]

It's against the law in most places.

[aerockster]

Hey I'm all for public nudity, nothing good comes from sexual repression. 5 stars for the principle. I certainly don't think it should be illegal to walk around naked, WHICH IT IS.

[FranzoC09]

Well, its quite odd to say the least, but if its what goes on its what goes on.

[deraifu]

....interesting

[ezravision]

i thought this would be a funny idea with spandex unitards and airbrushed shading, but nobody else I mentioned it to did. Too close for comfort, I guess. Halloween concept.

[sisterfuzz]

some people musy be really bored to do this

[clayguy1]

Think about how little sexual problems people would have if everyone went naked. Personaly, I'd probably clear out this whole part of Montana if I went naked... lol

[bebikute9496]

crazy :]]

[playartun]

yea.... seriously...o_0

[demir30]

serieusly ?

[secoxxx]

lol, sweet suits

[runswithscissorsalot]

weird!!!!!!!!!

[Southparknscrubs]

what?!

[ghostfire1234]

now lets see if gucci and prada will put this on the runway...

[aatif123456789]

what is theis

[ihmen]

aint it hard when you discover that, adam and eve werent white

[sinepgod]

i kno, they were pink

[dorkymagenta]

we may not even know that adam and eve actually 'were,' and even if so we wouldnt know whether they were white or not. :)

[TheIniquitous]

Why are genitals (even fake in this case) censored but everyone approves violence?

[hobo59]

grrrrrrrreat !

[Consophist]

WOT THE FOCK ?

[lonewolfqaz]

Who would have thought a fuzzy fabric penis would be considered more inappropriate than a pubic hair covered vulva.

[Tesla7zap]

Why would anyone ever want to put this on?

[MeLikeMusiic]

thats just disturbing!

[cptaixel]

I've seen the picture floating around the net, and I thought watching the video would explain these bizarre suits....but ..

[GooberMcNutly]

So, they can show female crotches but not male crotches? Hmmm.

[TheKentuckyBatman]

Um... they do censor the female crotch.

[Mayhem30]

ok ...

[spullen]

no thanks

[solidkingcobra]

O_O!

-_-

[derekaitken]

Why not just be actually naked?

I am so confused!