first off what i said has nothing to do with the crusades so i dont know why you pulled that out of your ass. second alexander the great anal raped the muslims. the indians gave them way more trouble than the persians. third try and make more sense next time.
I don't think the Persians were practicing Islam yet when Alexander trounced them. Actually, I don't think anyone was practicing Islam. Or Christianity, for that matter.
Ehem...By "muslims" I hope you mean "Zoroastrians," because the Persians followed the prophet Zoroaster in the 4th century BC, not Muhammed of Islam, who wouldn't be born for another nine centuries. I mean, for Christ sake, Zoroaster's religion was taken up by the Parthians and Sassanids of Persia. Kind of hard to miss that. Please, try to make more sense next time.
you could have taken out a lot of the foresters with your towers if you had them on fire at will, because they launch ballista rounds out from the slit at the top, above where the gate flips down.
i havent played for a while, so maybe this feature was eliminated, but if it wasn't it could save a lot of work
cool acsent dude go britan you sound smart, I'm into history too lol. Got barbairian invasion or Madievel total war orrrrrr Alexander? If not there awesome.
Well, the wall-towers release a continual stream of automatic flaming-bolts which target your siege equipment as you close in, without any assistance from archers on the walls, and you need at least 3 rams to advance at the same time to get one to reach the gate intact (when dealing with walls this size). So in practice I'm pretty sure it wouldn't have made much difference.
i know a way to break the gate of a 'huge city' like rome:
take your catapults, set them to flaming pots, and order them to attack the 'gatehouse'(Not the gate). once it is destroyed, use a battering ram to break the gates.
I find that, on epic stone walls, that most of the defenders on a wall are killed by artillery fired from the siege towers. I call it 'green mist' for this is the colour that these artillery shots are. Know what I mean?
Do you have any intention of playing Empire or M2TW? Because I just picked up Medieval 2 on sale.... I miss your videos.
Cornbinks 2 months ago
make more rtw videos please! ill lick you.
dogslobber45 1 year ago
Parthia actually won? Fascinating. Though the defenders mistakes were as astounding.
Khlae 1 year ago
hey cluny are you considering doing more co-commentary with PrinceofMacedon?
blurayz3 1 year ago
@blurayz3 No, I'm done with RTW for now.
ClunytheScourge1 1 year ago
@ClunytheScourge1 oh ok man :)
blurayz3 1 year ago
great battle Cluny
PatriotGabe 1 year ago
vomit stain haha
GizmoMofo7 2 years ago
love the strategic prowess mixed with comedy
brekgar 2 years ago
haha hillman climb
brekgar 2 years ago
but hillmen is better than eastern infantry right?
johnluppin 2 years ago
@johnluppin they are about even if u look at the stats
lucifer66633 2 years ago
This is probably my favourite seige battle ever. i watch this whenever I want to see elephants running thourgh the streets of Rome.
dcsmith5100 2 years ago
I saw the title, and was like... "Parthia, siege? They couldn't win a siege for anything.
Dauntless07 2 years ago
Don't the siege towers get ballistas or something when u face epic walls?
MandaloreV 2 years ago
They do, and the roman turtle formation is powerless against it lol.
PrinceNation 2 years ago
i have played alexanderthegreat he is terrible
GameMan53 2 years ago
lol your a retard
joeratti 2 years ago 2
first off what i said has nothing to do with the crusades so i dont know why you pulled that out of your ass. second alexander the great anal raped the muslims. the indians gave them way more trouble than the persians. third try and make more sense next time.
joeratti 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
hey hey dont take notice of him he's muslim which means he's a moron
GameMan53 2 years ago
I don't think the Persians were practicing Islam yet when Alexander trounced them. Actually, I don't think anyone was practicing Islam. Or Christianity, for that matter.
HRCSJSUAMMAS 2 years ago 2
@joeratti
Ehem...By "muslims" I hope you mean "Zoroastrians," because the Persians followed the prophet Zoroaster in the 4th century BC, not Muhammed of Islam, who wouldn't be born for another nine centuries. I mean, for Christ sake, Zoroaster's religion was taken up by the Parthians and Sassanids of Persia. Kind of hard to miss that. Please, try to make more sense next time.
EricMetalGuitarist 1 year ago
nicely done, but i ask myself wheter it would have worked if your opponent wasn't so stupid with placing/choosing his troops
romanphoenix999 2 years ago 3
This has been flagged as spam show
just like the muslims of today. heads stuck up their asses.
joeratti 2 years ago
i thought the exact same thing :0
littlemonty94 2 years ago 3
you could have taken out a lot of the foresters with your towers if you had them on fire at will, because they launch ballista rounds out from the slit at the top, above where the gate flips down.
i havent played for a while, so maybe this feature was eliminated, but if it wasn't it could save a lot of work
nhf2001 2 years ago
head stuck up each others arses thats funny
darkforest0113 2 years ago
Whould u battle once Prince_of_Macedon??? im curious what factions whould u chose and who will win of course ;).
K0ragg 2 years ago
this was a cool battle lol what a huge wall
K0ragg 2 years ago
An "epic" wall in the game's jargon.
ClunytheScourge1 2 years ago
(no racism included in that comment).
adventure299 2 years ago
cool acsent dude go britan you sound smart, I'm into history too lol. Got barbairian invasion or Madievel total war orrrrrr Alexander? If not there awesome.
adventure299 2 years ago
I have BI, ALX and M2. If you're interested, you can find some of my BI and ALX battle videos on my account.
ClunytheScourge1 2 years ago
Parthians are great in the field, but they are quite lame on walls, as they have no good infantry.
LionOfCarthage 3 years ago
It's only a pity we can't train cataphract-camels to climb ladders, I guess.
ClunytheScourge1 3 years ago
Yep.
ClunytheScourge1 3 years ago
wouldnt it be better that you attacked the walls first with your towers and when you are fighting the archers, attacks the gate with the ram?
rolle16 3 years ago
Well, the wall-towers release a continual stream of automatic flaming-bolts which target your siege equipment as you close in, without any assistance from archers on the walls, and you need at least 3 rams to advance at the same time to get one to reach the gate intact (when dealing with walls this size). So in practice I'm pretty sure it wouldn't have made much difference.
ClunytheScourge1 3 years ago
yep...
i know a way to break the gate of a 'huge city' like rome:
take your catapults, set them to flaming pots, and order them to attack the 'gatehouse'(Not the gate). once it is destroyed, use a battering ram to break the gates.
carthagertw 3 years ago
I find that, on epic stone walls, that most of the defenders on a wall are killed by artillery fired from the siege towers. I call it 'green mist' for this is the colour that these artillery shots are. Know what I mean?
Helbrechtstein 3 years ago 3
I refuse to build walls above stone after experiancing epic stone wall tower's siege towers. Those ballistae are more powerful than ETW artillery!
Rogue0071 3 years ago
Sure does look cool though.
ClunytheScourge1 3 years ago