Secret Agent Insurance Adjuster - Doyle Raizner LLP deposition Video

[insurancegame]

It's because of scam insurers that lawyers have many clients.

[duckjd]

About the only legitimate questions in this video are: do you have a job and who do you work for. Even those are not relevant to what appears to be a case against an insurance company. They are however appropriate as background questions and the answers can be checked (with a call) to test this truthfulness.. Frankly if the witness refused to answer this at a deposition I am not convinced a judge would order him to without the lawyer laying some kind of foundation for the question.

[lhpgators]

WOW! What a savvy attorney. Look at this drunk lawyer IN COURT!! ht tp://ww w.youtube. com/watch?v=yV2qtvbIPFE&fe ature=related

Is he in your practice? Lawyers are the issue. Like the ones sending out blind mailers to home owners asking if they have a crack in the house. "Call us and we'll teach you how to file a claim." Which then requires the insurance carrier to pay for geological testing which costs $10,000.00+. Frivolous claim? Unnecessary expense? …continued

[lhpgators]

Ahhh who cares right? If the homeowner is coached to tell their carrier "I'm worried about sinkholes" even if there is no basis for their worry, the carrier is required to shell out $10K for testing. …continued

[lhpgators]

Then the geotech reports come back and say "well its probably normal settlement and/or high levels of clay in the soil and/or normal expansion and contraction and/or improper compaction of the first 2" to 4" inches of earth under the slab........but, we cannot rule out sinkhole (because if a sinkhole does in fact open up 200 years from now, we don't want to be liable). …continued

[lhpgators]

What the attorneys don't tell the home owner is if you get a geotech to not rule out sinkhole, then your property tax record states you have a sinkhole. Ever want to sell your house? good luck. Even if the geotech report is truthful and says "no sinkhole" then you, the homeowner, will need to rectify the foundation issue at your own expense, otherwise good luck getting any carrier to insured your property. Either way, the homeowner loses and the attorney gets paid.

[DeleteMeifyoucan]

@KE4RWS I have an extremely valid and effective argument against yours, but I can't say it without approval of certain people. I work for an agency, the name of which I can't disclose to you. I also can't give you the name of my supervisor, a phone number or any way to verify if I work for the FB... agency. I started there right after I quit my job as a janitor. Just know that my argument beats yours solely because I'm a secret agent.

See how easy it is. I get this all the time from "agents"