It’s impossible for a company to get what it wants most if managers have to make a choice between their own values and company priorities. slap Company
He's right. There is no such thing as original thought. All which you know, which is acculative knowledge is derived from experience of that knowledge at first hand as a child observed from looking at others or learning from another.
While I believe he´s onto something concidering human intelligence, the assumption that only humans have language is plain wrong. However, we have taken the language further than any other species, in terms of storing and making knowledge available to ourselves.
I think people often fail in two ways:
Nr.1. Giving other species humanlike qualities which they dont have.
Nr.2. Failing to see/denying qualities other species actually DO have, in fear of doing nr.1
Fascinating commentary. I just question the cultural assumption that animals don't have language. Of course they do. We just have not cracked the code
I have seen experiments where a chicken was taught to recognize words.
I like the fact that we have taught dolphins 1000 words and ways to become suicide bombers for the navy but we don't understand one word they are saying to us. We are twisted.
Just more evidence of our desire to control rather than conform.
I think if people start to really use psychology to understand our own functions in terms of language, then we'll be able to recognize that language system used by animals. I personally believe animals DO have a language -- are we humans arrogant to accept it, and just want to be... superior? I think yes.
As we are all one, it is the ONE that likes to express it self through everything, the variety, even in terms of vertical complexity, is an enrichment, To deny evolution and human complexity is to deny the greatness of a part of existence, a form form of existential fashism, kinda like anti-civilatory ecofashism, both divides the world in good and bad, just as much as the dogmas they try to oppose, mirroring them without surpassing them.
cultural assumption? come on... of course animals have language it is just extremely rudimentary, instinctive and a reflection of much less complex and self-aware brains. there is no cultural assumption there - simple biology. language has it's origin in the brain - the more complex the brain the more complex the language.... ruff, ruff, howwwwwl becomes shakespeare...
The relationship isn't so simple. Examine a small song bird flying through a bush and then study aerodynamics - you'll find that the computational ability and flight control abilities are far beyond what people or robots can achieve.
Language is a freak adaptation, a new kind of networking ability that uses noise to spread information between individuals. In itself it isn't complicated. What is special about humans is that we find such noise so useful. Hence why we're good at it.
I think what he means by slowing down development means becoming stuck in a process of learning during an entire life instead of becoming an organism that follows it's instincts through chemical command within it's DNA. We have the freedom of conscious thought, which raises the question, who has more freedom? The human who bares the weight of the world on his back, or the simpler animal which has a life where survival becomes it's only worry? Who really has the most freedom?
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
What a complete moron. Humans a re so stupid, they might go toward a raging forrest fire while the animals are smart enough to get out of Dodge? Humans slowed their rate of development? Mutation? Heck! Billions of experiemnets prove mutation does not cause permanent morphological change!
This is so much more interesting and necessary than anyone's 2 or 3000 year old sacred writings and so much more interesting and enlightening than chemical formulas and mathematical equations.
Neotony = An extended "Open" space to learn by playing - But then we invent School - where we shut done play and so maybe play curiosity and wonder
robbiepat 1 week ago
It’s impossible for a company to get what it wants most if managers have to make a choice between their own values and company priorities. slap Company
slapcompany 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
This reflects what Jung said about the "Collective Experience" of the mind. Fascinating how these thoughts converge.
Bognarfan 1 year ago
This reflects what Jung said about the "Collective Experience" of the mind. Fascinating how these thoughts converge.
Bognarfan 1 year ago
He's right. There is no such thing as original thought. All which you know, which is acculative knowledge is derived from experience of that knowledge at first hand as a child observed from looking at others or learning from another.
WLDInternationale 2 years ago
While I believe he´s onto something concidering human intelligence, the assumption that only humans have language is plain wrong. However, we have taken the language further than any other species, in terms of storing and making knowledge available to ourselves.
I think people often fail in two ways:
Nr.1. Giving other species humanlike qualities which they dont have.
Nr.2. Failing to see/denying qualities other species actually DO have, in fear of doing nr.1
bloodcream 2 years ago 2
professor ron paul
mikezephyr 3 years ago 2
You saw that resemblance too, seems quite uncanny.
Slavesrevolt 3 years ago 2
Fascinating commentary. I just question the cultural assumption that animals don't have language. Of course they do. We just have not cracked the code
ziaparker 4 years ago 3
I have seen experiments where a chicken was taught to recognize words.
I like the fact that we have taught dolphins 1000 words and ways to become suicide bombers for the navy but we don't understand one word they are saying to us. We are twisted.
Just more evidence of our desire to control rather than conform.
Slavesrevolt 3 years ago 3
I think if people start to really use psychology to understand our own functions in terms of language, then we'll be able to recognize that language system used by animals. I personally believe animals DO have a language -- are we humans arrogant to accept it, and just want to be... superior? I think yes.
neostryke 3 years ago 2
As we are all one, it is the ONE that likes to express it self through everything, the variety, even in terms of vertical complexity, is an enrichment, To deny evolution and human complexity is to deny the greatness of a part of existence, a form form of existential fashism, kinda like anti-civilatory ecofashism, both divides the world in good and bad, just as much as the dogmas they try to oppose, mirroring them without surpassing them.
Fendefadst 3 years ago
@ziaparker
cultural assumption? come on... of course animals have language it is just extremely rudimentary, instinctive and a reflection of much less complex and self-aware brains. there is no cultural assumption there - simple biology. language has it's origin in the brain - the more complex the brain the more complex the language.... ruff, ruff, howwwwwl becomes shakespeare...
JAYDUBYAH29 1 year ago
@JAYDUBYAH29
The relationship isn't so simple. Examine a small song bird flying through a bush and then study aerodynamics - you'll find that the computational ability and flight control abilities are far beyond what people or robots can achieve.
Language is a freak adaptation, a new kind of networking ability that uses noise to spread information between individuals. In itself it isn't complicated. What is special about humans is that we find such noise so useful. Hence why we're good at it.
Hrimpurstala 1 year ago
Hey...Read "Power vs. Force"
moneymasterjet 4 years ago
As always, Brian Swimme gives us a glimpse into the miracles of our universe!
EXCELLENT!
jenniferjones1000 4 years ago 6
I think what he means by slowing down development means becoming stuck in a process of learning during an entire life instead of becoming an organism that follows it's instincts through chemical command within it's DNA. We have the freedom of conscious thought, which raises the question, who has more freedom? The human who bares the weight of the world on his back, or the simpler animal which has a life where survival becomes it's only worry? Who really has the most freedom?
brums05 4 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
What a complete moron. Humans a re so stupid, they might go toward a raging forrest fire while the animals are smart enough to get out of Dodge? Humans slowed their rate of development? Mutation? Heck! Billions of experiemnets prove mutation does not cause permanent morphological change!
NephilimFree 4 years ago
This is so much more interesting and necessary than anyone's 2 or 3000 year old sacred writings and so much more interesting and enlightening than chemical formulas and mathematical equations.
osunbooks 4 years ago
Interesting, if a little slow in delivery.
Altres 4 years ago
good series
amarbleinspace 4 years ago
Agreed
TYSOHN 4 years ago