Why is there a lot of religous bullshit in the comments. All this crap about the existence of god has nothing to do with this, Its a fucking comedy song. Leave your religous crap for conversations with your own people, all your going to do here is cause problems
ALTHOUGH I'M A CONSERVATIVE CHRISTIAN (Baptist), I no longer believe that the Bible teaches eternal torment or suffering. The Bible teaches eternal punishment, but it's not eternal torment. In my popular Internet article, TRADITIONAL DOCTRINE OF HELL EVOLVED FROM GREEK ROOTS, I explain how and why teaching of eternal torment entered early into Christianity and how Scriptures have been misinterpreted and taken out of context to support that teaching. ~Babu G. Ranganathan (B.A. theology/biology)
SCIENCE SHOWS THAT THE UNIVERSE could not have sustained itself eternally because of entropy (even in an open system). Einstein confirmed that space, matter, and time had a beginning! That beginning had to be supernatural because natural laws have no ability to bring the universe into existence from nothing. The supernatural cannot be proved by science but science points to a supernatural intelligence for the origin and order of the universe ~ HOW FORENSIC SCIENCE REFUTES ATHEISM (Article)
EINSTEIN CONFIRMED that space and time are just as physical as matter. That's why space and time can be altered by gravity, and space produces particles. Einstein's equations show that the universe couldn’t be eternal. It had a beginning. Einstein believed, because of science, in the existence of God behind the origin and order of the universe. He didn't believe in a personal God like Christians do, but he did believe science pointed to the existence of an all powerful and intelligent Creator
THE SCIENTIFIC CASE AGAINST ATHEISM: Please read this Internet article of mine published in Russia's English Pravda. It will be a real eye-opener for all who think belief in a Creator is merely subjective blind faith. Also read my article, LIFE ON MARS NO SURPRISE (In the Earth's past there was powerful volcanic activity which spewed life-containing dirt and rocks (meteors) into outer space. Mars may literally have millions tons of Earth soil)
NATURAL LIMITS TO EVOLUTION: Only evolution within "kinds" is genetically possible (i.e. varieties of dogs, cats, etc.), but not evolution across "kinds" (i.e. from worm to human). How were species living and reproducing if their vital structures, organs, reproductive systems hadn't evolved yet? Read my Pravda Internet article: WAR AMONG EVOLUTIONISTS! I discuss: Punctuated Equilibrium, "Junk DNA," genetics, mutations, natural selection, fossils, genetic/biological similarities between species
DAWKINS, HITCHENS, AND HAWKING REFUSE TO DEBATE with creationists who are SCIENTISTS, such as the scientists at The Institute for Creation Research. Dawkins and his friends only debate non-scientist creationists. Read articles by scientists supporting creation at The Institute for Creation Research site. Read analysis from creation scientists about the latest news concerning fossils, astronomy, etc. that you won't read in the main stream media. Visit the Institute for Creation Research site.
WHAT IS SCIENCE? Science simply is knowledge based on observation. No one observed the universe coming by chance or by design, by creation or by macro-evolution. These are positions of faith. The issue is which faith the scientific evidence best supports. Natural laws can explain how an airplane or living cell works, but it's irrational to believe that undirected natural laws can bring about an airplane or a living cell. Read my Internet article: HOW FORENSIC SCIENCE REFUTES ATHEISM
NATURAL SELECTION DOESN'T PRODUCE ANYTHING. It can only "select" from what is produced that has survival value. If a variation occurs that helps a species survive, that survival is called being "selected." That's all its is. There's no conscious selection by nature. It's a passive process. Natural selection is a figure of speech. The term itself is a tautology. Natural selection only operates once there is life and reproduction, not before. Read my article: HOW FORENSIC SCIENCE REFUTES ATHEISM.
NATURAL SELECTION IS NO BLIND WATCHMAKER because it can only "select," not produce or arrange. If a variation survives, that's called being "selected." Natural selection operates only once there is life and reproduction, not before, so it couldn't have been involved in life's origins. A partially-evolved cell (an oxymoron) would quickly disintegrate. It couldn't wait ("survive") millions of years for chance to complete it and then make it alive! Read: HOW FORENSIC SCIENCE REFUTES ATHEISM
IMAGINE A FISH WITH PART FINS, part feet with the fins evolving (transitioning) into feet. What survival benefit would there be? The fish couldn't use its fins or its feet, and there are no fossils showing such a creature ever existed. They only exist on automobile bumper stickers! There are no true transitional forms, either living or fossilized. Evolutionists realize this fact! Read my Internet article: WAR AMONG EVOLUTIONISTS!
APES ARE QUITE COMFORTABLE IN HOW THEY WALK, just as humans are quite comfortable in how they walk. Even a slight change in the position of a muscle or bone, for either, would be excruciatingly painful and would not be an advantage for survival. There's no hard evidence that humans evolved from ape-like creatures anymore than there's hard evidence that apes evolved from four-legged-pawed dog-like creatures. Read Internet article: MISSING LINKS THAT NEVER WERE.
GENETIC INFORMATION CANNOT HAPPEN BY CHANCE, so it's more logical to believe that genetic similarities between all forms of life are due to a common Designer who designed similar functions for similar purposes. It doesn't mean all forms of life are biologically related! Also, "Junk DNA" isn't junk. These non-coding segments of DNA have recently been found to be vital in regulating gene expression. Read my popular Internet article: HOW FORENSIC SCIENCE REFUTES ATHEISM
ALL REAL EVOLUTION ( i.e. varieties of dogs, cats, etc.) in nature is the expression, over time, of already existing genes. Evolution is possible only if there’s information (genes) directing it. Only variations of already existing genes are possible, which means only limited evolution and adaptations are possible. Nature has no ability to invent new genes via random mutations caused by random environmental forces. That’s evolutionary faith, not science. Read my article, WAR AMONG EVOLUTIONISTS!
DO EYES CARRY SCARS OF EVOLUTION? Read this fantastic Internet article by biologist and creationist Brian Thomas. Thomas refutes every argument of a "flawed" design for the eye, and explains how and why the so-called flaw is actually the best thing for the eye. Read the article! It's amazing what facts evolutionists will ignore. Numerous times evolutionists have been proven wrong about their interpretation of a structure as being flawed or useless
Perfection. Absolute perfection. Anyone who can find this offensive searches way too hard to find insults (and he insults everybody, so they all cancel each other out).
IRONIC... but it's the deluded, SUV-drivin', MEGA-church worshipin', WAL-Mart shoppin', NRA-lovin', over-weight and bloated CHRISTIAN HYPOCRITES who park their lard-laden asses in their double-wide LAZY-BOYZ... starin' LIKE SHEEP IN HEADLIGHTS at their super-wide-screens, decked out like doofuses in their NFL-approved, over-priced size XXXL jerseys... chippin n' dippin their lives away.
PRAY for 'em because they are yearnin' for... the elusive JAY-SUS?... the RUPTURE?... nope... NASCAR!!!
@TheBiAtheist Well... i know it's a wee bit "stereotypical" (heh, heh), but having grown up in "the bible belt"... the Land of Kudzu and KKKrosses... there's more than several grains of truth contained in that diatribe:-)
If these deluded folks only had a clue... but since the jesus myth has been hammered into their brains from childhood, and reinforced culturally in every possible way... very unlikely.
Cheers to all who seek... not parroting the myths thrust upon them!
@TheBiAtheist Not to start a personal dialogue on this thread... but since you asked, we moved to Colorado 5 years ago... and i grew up in Atlanta. Colorado has it's "red-neck" conservative, NRA-lemming, bible-thumpers in the rural areas and smaller cities (esp. Colorado Springs... crass mega-church capital!), but not as obnoxious or obese:-)
@LordCbass The only place I made an apology was in your imagination. I'm taking back nothing. But feel free to keep right on lying if it makes you feel better - you know - like how the underpinning of all religion works.
@dunbar9finger I see you like denial. But feel free to keep right on lying if it makes you feel better - you know - like how the underpinning of all religion works.
@LordCbass - Keep in mind that the context of my statement was in response to your attempt to post as if "he's agnostic" was somehow a correction to the post I made. That's why I presumed you were operating under the incorrect definitions that make it seem as if the two are mutually exclusive. If you were operating under the correct definitions, then you'd have no reason to "correct" what I said.
@ChiSportsNut18 You're upset because someone openly expresses their lack of belief in a god??? Yet, you feel perfectly entitled to express your lutheraneism? :O
@ChiSportsNut18 - what an incredibly horrible and un-American attitude. You don't think someone should even express their beliefs or lack thereof? The fact that you'd judge someone for such a thing shows clearly that you haven't understood a word that your supposed Savior said. Shame on you! Shame! You don't deserve to live in the land of the free, and if there is a heaven, you may well find yourself denied entry due to your small-mindedness.
I'm sorry. What I said was rude and uncalled for to any viewers of this video. I was in a bad mood and feeling tired when I typed in what I did. There's no harm in it now because my comment got erased.
@TheMrCompletely OK - write that in verse - set a melody to it - and get out there with your own banjo!! Prove him [Steve, of course] wrong!! That channel I can subscribe to!! HAHAHAHAHAHA
@LordCbass I never said he can't be an agnostic. I said he was an atheist. Are you one of those people operating under the misconception that "atheist" and "agnostic' are mutually exclusive? Well, as someone who IS both, I can tell you you're wrong. Most of the time the misconception that they're exclusive comes from an incorrect definition of "atheism" that presumes "I don't believe in god" is identical to "I believe god is disproven." They're not.
@LordCbass Of course I didn't mention it - for the same reason I didn't mention his favorite color or what kind of car he drives - because just like those things, his agnosticism is irrelevant to the point I was making that this was a song written BY an atheist. (The fact that it's an atheist who also happens to be an agnostic too wasn't worth mentioning because agnosticism doesn't preclude atheism.)
this almost makes up for him being such an asshole.....in his defense, its hard to stay happy when the majority of the world are crazy religious psychos
@Skrothn : I was using John Lenon's song "Imagine", which is well liked by a lot of atheists, as an example to counter the ideas that "atheists only sing the blues".
Oh. That makes sense. It still sucks that everyone always thinks of atheists as sad or angry people that like to argue. I kind of make it worse too since I am usually angry and like to argue :( But I think that attributes to everyone, and not just atheists.
Yo, damnthedog -- fix the spelling of "Atheists" in your video title -- it will make it easier for folks to find your version, which is the clearest and best on YouTube.
THANK you for posting this!! I want to learn this song! I was there, and looks like somewhere right near you. You didn't by any chance get video of the back of that bass, did you?? If so, please post!!
Can I get the lyrics to this? :P
princeofperiaByte 3 weeks ago
This was crazy funny!
zestydude87 3 weeks ago
Is Steve Martin atheist? Just curious.
NickKentucky 1 month ago
Why is there a lot of religous bullshit in the comments. All this crap about the existence of god has nothing to do with this, Its a fucking comedy song. Leave your religous crap for conversations with your own people, all your going to do here is cause problems
6Levayan6Music6 2 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
I like to picture a group of beluga whales jamming to this.
94Cioppa 3 months ago
Kierkegaard was a Christian Existentialist.
OneTrueEdge 5 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
ALTHOUGH I'M A CONSERVATIVE CHRISTIAN (Baptist), I no longer believe that the Bible teaches eternal torment or suffering. The Bible teaches eternal punishment, but it's not eternal torment. In my popular Internet article, TRADITIONAL DOCTRINE OF HELL EVOLVED FROM GREEK ROOTS, I explain how and why teaching of eternal torment entered early into Christianity and how Scriptures have been misinterpreted and taken out of context to support that teaching. ~Babu G. Ranganathan (B.A. theology/biology)
Mogley52 5 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
SCIENCE SHOWS THAT THE UNIVERSE could not have sustained itself eternally because of entropy (even in an open system). Einstein confirmed that space, matter, and time had a beginning! That beginning had to be supernatural because natural laws have no ability to bring the universe into existence from nothing. The supernatural cannot be proved by science but science points to a supernatural intelligence for the origin and order of the universe ~ HOW FORENSIC SCIENCE REFUTES ATHEISM (Article)
Mogley52 5 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
EINSTEIN CONFIRMED that space and time are just as physical as matter. That's why space and time can be altered by gravity, and space produces particles. Einstein's equations show that the universe couldn’t be eternal. It had a beginning. Einstein believed, because of science, in the existence of God behind the origin and order of the universe. He didn't believe in a personal God like Christians do, but he did believe science pointed to the existence of an all powerful and intelligent Creator
Mogley52 5 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
THE SCIENTIFIC CASE AGAINST ATHEISM: Please read this Internet article of mine published in Russia's English Pravda. It will be a real eye-opener for all who think belief in a Creator is merely subjective blind faith. Also read my article, LIFE ON MARS NO SURPRISE (In the Earth's past there was powerful volcanic activity which spewed life-containing dirt and rocks (meteors) into outer space. Mars may literally have millions tons of Earth soil)
Mogley52 5 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
NATURAL LIMITS TO EVOLUTION: Only evolution within "kinds" is genetically possible (i.e. varieties of dogs, cats, etc.), but not evolution across "kinds" (i.e. from worm to human). How were species living and reproducing if their vital structures, organs, reproductive systems hadn't evolved yet? Read my Pravda Internet article: WAR AMONG EVOLUTIONISTS! I discuss: Punctuated Equilibrium, "Junk DNA," genetics, mutations, natural selection, fossils, genetic/biological similarities between species
Mogley52 5 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
DAWKINS, HITCHENS, AND HAWKING REFUSE TO DEBATE with creationists who are SCIENTISTS, such as the scientists at The Institute for Creation Research. Dawkins and his friends only debate non-scientist creationists. Read articles by scientists supporting creation at The Institute for Creation Research site. Read analysis from creation scientists about the latest news concerning fossils, astronomy, etc. that you won't read in the main stream media. Visit the Institute for Creation Research site.
Mogley52 5 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
WHAT IS SCIENCE? Science simply is knowledge based on observation. No one observed the universe coming by chance or by design, by creation or by macro-evolution. These are positions of faith. The issue is which faith the scientific evidence best supports. Natural laws can explain how an airplane or living cell works, but it's irrational to believe that undirected natural laws can bring about an airplane or a living cell. Read my Internet article: HOW FORENSIC SCIENCE REFUTES ATHEISM
Mogley52 5 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
NATURAL SELECTION DOESN'T PRODUCE ANYTHING. It can only "select" from what is produced that has survival value. If a variation occurs that helps a species survive, that survival is called being "selected." That's all its is. There's no conscious selection by nature. It's a passive process. Natural selection is a figure of speech. The term itself is a tautology. Natural selection only operates once there is life and reproduction, not before. Read my article: HOW FORENSIC SCIENCE REFUTES ATHEISM.
Mogley52 5 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
NATURAL SELECTION IS NO BLIND WATCHMAKER because it can only "select," not produce or arrange. If a variation survives, that's called being "selected." Natural selection operates only once there is life and reproduction, not before, so it couldn't have been involved in life's origins. A partially-evolved cell (an oxymoron) would quickly disintegrate. It couldn't wait ("survive") millions of years for chance to complete it and then make it alive! Read: HOW FORENSIC SCIENCE REFUTES ATHEISM
Mogley52 5 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
IMAGINE A FISH WITH PART FINS, part feet with the fins evolving (transitioning) into feet. What survival benefit would there be? The fish couldn't use its fins or its feet, and there are no fossils showing such a creature ever existed. They only exist on automobile bumper stickers! There are no true transitional forms, either living or fossilized. Evolutionists realize this fact! Read my Internet article: WAR AMONG EVOLUTIONISTS!
Mogley52 5 months ago
Comment removed
Mogley52 5 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
APES ARE QUITE COMFORTABLE IN HOW THEY WALK, just as humans are quite comfortable in how they walk. Even a slight change in the position of a muscle or bone, for either, would be excruciatingly painful and would not be an advantage for survival. There's no hard evidence that humans evolved from ape-like creatures anymore than there's hard evidence that apes evolved from four-legged-pawed dog-like creatures. Read Internet article: MISSING LINKS THAT NEVER WERE.
Mogley52 5 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
GENETIC INFORMATION CANNOT HAPPEN BY CHANCE, so it's more logical to believe that genetic similarities between all forms of life are due to a common Designer who designed similar functions for similar purposes. It doesn't mean all forms of life are biologically related! Also, "Junk DNA" isn't junk. These non-coding segments of DNA have recently been found to be vital in regulating gene expression. Read my popular Internet article: HOW FORENSIC SCIENCE REFUTES ATHEISM
Mogley52 5 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
ALL REAL EVOLUTION ( i.e. varieties of dogs, cats, etc.) in nature is the expression, over time, of already existing genes. Evolution is possible only if there’s information (genes) directing it. Only variations of already existing genes are possible, which means only limited evolution and adaptations are possible. Nature has no ability to invent new genes via random mutations caused by random environmental forces. That’s evolutionary faith, not science. Read my article, WAR AMONG EVOLUTIONISTS!
Mogley52 5 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
DO EYES CARRY SCARS OF EVOLUTION? Read this fantastic Internet article by biologist and creationist Brian Thomas. Thomas refutes every argument of a "flawed" design for the eye, and explains how and why the so-called flaw is actually the best thing for the eye. Read the article! It's amazing what facts evolutionists will ignore. Numerous times evolutionists have been proven wrong about their interpretation of a structure as being flawed or useless
Mogley52 5 months ago
Perfection. Absolute perfection. Anyone who can find this offensive searches way too hard to find insults (and he insults everybody, so they all cancel each other out).
ladywhen 8 months ago
notice at 2:02 the red lights dim and they look like Stars of David! how's that for irony!! haha... love this song!!! Steve Martin is a legend!
mostlythemusic 9 months ago
Can anyone name an atheist blues song? I'd like to hear it.
niltomega 10 months ago
@niltomega that it's the point of the joke or i think so :P
horriblequin 7 months ago
I'm a Christian, and I might think this is funny, but I can't understand most of the the words... Are the lyrics posted anywhere???
MrSnacko 10 months ago
IRONIC... but it's the deluded, SUV-drivin', MEGA-church worshipin', WAL-Mart shoppin', NRA-lovin', over-weight and bloated CHRISTIAN HYPOCRITES who park their lard-laden asses in their double-wide LAZY-BOYZ... starin' LIKE SHEEP IN HEADLIGHTS at their super-wide-screens, decked out like doofuses in their NFL-approved, over-priced size XXXL jerseys... chippin n' dippin their lives away.
PRAY for 'em because they are yearnin' for... the elusive JAY-SUS?... the RUPTURE?... nope... NASCAR!!!
NooGods 10 months ago 4
@NooGods Best comment ever.
TheBiAtheist 1 month ago
@TheBiAtheist Well... i know it's a wee bit "stereotypical" (heh, heh), but having grown up in "the bible belt"... the Land of Kudzu and KKKrosses... there's more than several grains of truth contained in that diatribe:-)
If these deluded folks only had a clue... but since the jesus myth has been hammered into their brains from childhood, and reinforced culturally in every possible way... very unlikely.
Cheers to all who seek... not parroting the myths thrust upon them!
NooGods 1 month ago
@NooGods What state do you live in? I'm in Georgia. They act like Jesus was born here.
TheBiAtheist 1 month ago
@TheBiAtheist Not to start a personal dialogue on this thread... but since you asked, we moved to Colorado 5 years ago... and i grew up in Atlanta. Colorado has it's "red-neck" conservative, NRA-lemming, bible-thumpers in the rural areas and smaller cities (esp. Colorado Springs... crass mega-church capital!), but not as obnoxious or obese:-)
NooGods 1 month ago
@NooGods I live 45 minutes south of Atlanta. I know exactly what you mean.
TheBiAtheist 1 month ago
@NooGods Hate much?
zestydude87 3 weeks ago
As a committed Christian, I take it as tongue-in-cheek. I think it's hilarious!
lfbensonjr 10 months ago
"watch football in thier underpants>" lol
dancebecausewecan 11 months ago
Hilarious!
tmomaslomez 11 months ago
This is an absolute hoot! ;o) Hope to go to Merlefest this year - I wish Steve would be there...
rightwinggal 1 year ago
Or just click my channel, if you want to see a good atheist song.
GodlessInfinity 1 year ago
:P Atheist Songs are normally comical actually, look up "Ted Haggard is Completely Heterosexual" if you're interested. ;)
GodlessInfinity 1 year ago 2
why were ppl refunded their money at a steve martin show recently???
ilsy74 1 year ago
I love it! Yes we have rock and roll!
linnie221 1 year ago 2
Brilliant! Athesists don't have much of anything.
gurucarcar 1 year ago
Steve Martin is a good Freethinker and Vegetarian. But has nobody told him about the Symphony Of Science by John Boswell?
SaganAppreciationSoc 1 year ago
atheism>agnostic
LordCbass 1 year ago
@LordCbass yeah. an agnostic is just a lazy atheist.
gurucarcar 1 year ago
It is true... I always spell god with a lower case.
Ablack51 1 year ago
I wasn't apologizing. I was taking the time to use more words so I could walk you through what I said the first time.
dunbar9finger 1 year ago
@dunbar9finger you can't take back apologies. thats rude
LordCbass 1 year ago
@LordCbass The only place I made an apology was in your imagination. I'm taking back nothing. But feel free to keep right on lying if it makes you feel better - you know - like how the underpinning of all religion works.
dunbar9finger 1 year ago
@dunbar9finger I see you like denial. But feel free to keep right on lying if it makes you feel better - you know - like how the underpinning of all religion works.
LordCbass 1 year ago
@LordCbass victory for me, I'm atheist
LordCbass 1 year ago
@dunbar9finger god (pun intended) your dumb.
LordCbass 1 year ago
@LordCbass What about my dumb? My dumb what?
dunbar9finger 1 year ago 2
@dunbar9finger hahaha, you. are. dumb.
LordCbass 1 year ago
@LordCbass - Keep in mind that the context of my statement was in response to your attempt to post as if "he's agnostic" was somehow a correction to the post I made. That's why I presumed you were operating under the incorrect definitions that make it seem as if the two are mutually exclusive. If you were operating under the correct definitions, then you'd have no reason to "correct" what I said.
dunbar9finger 1 year ago
Hahahaha. Im having this played at my funeral
jamieclark420 1 year ago 31
Comment removed
ChiSportsNut18 1 year ago
@ChiSportsNut18 You're upset because someone openly expresses their lack of belief in a god??? Yet, you feel perfectly entitled to express your lutheraneism? :O
Can you not hear how bigotted that sounds?
elliesmall 1 year ago
@ChiSportsNut18 - what an incredibly horrible and un-American attitude. You don't think someone should even express their beliefs or lack thereof? The fact that you'd judge someone for such a thing shows clearly that you haven't understood a word that your supposed Savior said. Shame on you! Shame! You don't deserve to live in the land of the free, and if there is a heaven, you may well find yourself denied entry due to your small-mindedness.
TheMrCompletely 1 year ago
@TheMrCompletely
I'm sorry. What I said was rude and uncalled for to any viewers of this video. I was in a bad mood and feeling tired when I typed in what I did. There's no harm in it now because my comment got erased.
ChiSportsNut18 1 year ago
@ChiSportsNut18 Oh - well, OK. I was jus' havin' a li'l fun!!
Septagon47 1 year ago
@TheMrCompletely OK - write that in verse - set a melody to it - and get out there with your own banjo!! Prove him [Steve, of course] wrong!! That channel I can subscribe to!! HAHAHAHAHAHA
Septagon47 1 year ago
Haha. No. This song is not anti atheist. I am a very strong atheist, but I can recognize satire when I hear it. I was laughing so hard at this!
trinity0408 1 year ago
To all the idiots who think this song is anti-atheist. Steve Martin wrote it and he IS an atheist. This was meant as self-deprecating humor.
dunbar9finger 1 year ago
@dunbar9finger he's agnostic
LordCbass 1 year ago
@LordCbass I never said he can't be an agnostic. I said he was an atheist. Are you one of those people operating under the misconception that "atheist" and "agnostic' are mutually exclusive? Well, as someone who IS both, I can tell you you're wrong. Most of the time the misconception that they're exclusive comes from an incorrect definition of "atheism" that presumes "I don't believe in god" is identical to "I believe god is disproven." They're not.
dunbar9finger 1 year ago
@dunbar9finger you did not state that he was agnostic regardless of your aloof statement
LordCbass 1 year ago
@LordCbass Of course I didn't mention it - for the same reason I didn't mention his favorite color or what kind of car he drives - because just like those things, his agnosticism is irrelevant to the point I was making that this was a song written BY an atheist. (The fact that it's an atheist who also happens to be an agnostic too wasn't worth mentioning because agnosticism doesn't preclude atheism.)
dunbar9finger 1 year ago
@dunbar9finger apology accepted
LordCbass 1 year ago
is steve martin atheist?
jubjub444 1 year ago
@jubjub444 good question is he?
tomata182 1 year ago
@jubjub444 Does it matter? Would you like him less?
matthewtaylorbrown 1 year ago
@matthewtaylorbrown i would like him more!
jubjub444 1 year ago
this almost makes up for him being such an asshole.....in his defense, its hard to stay happy when the majority of the world are crazy religious psychos
sethmusic 1 year ago
I wish Steve Martin still did stand up. This is hilarious!!!!
MeaningofLif 1 year ago
i can't understand a single word... can someone help me out?
El3ctricPenguin 1 year ago
I'm an agnostic-atheist and I think this song is pretty funny!
Zeeboe 1 year ago
You've probably been told this before but...
it's "atheist".
ravengirl1960 1 year ago
Four words might be enough to debunk this song: "Imagine all the people..."
MitchLampert 1 year ago
@MitchLampert Why do you wanna debunk SATIRE? I LOVE it!
waldegg 1 year ago
@MitchLampert
lolwut?
Skrothn 1 year ago
@Skrothn : I was using John Lenon's song "Imagine", which is well liked by a lot of atheists, as an example to counter the ideas that "atheists only sing the blues".
MitchLampert 1 year ago
@MitchLampert
Oh. That makes sense. It still sucks that everyone always thinks of atheists as sad or angry people that like to argue. I kind of make it worse too since I am usually angry and like to argue :( But I think that attributes to everyone, and not just atheists.
Skrothn 1 year ago
this is hilarious.
danielleoh 1 year ago
always loooved Steve :-)
waldegg 1 year ago
That was so funny
Ajohnzzile0819 1 year ago
Fabulous -
leland61 1 year ago
This IS funny!
spriggig 1 year ago
Brillaint!
dominictemple 1 year ago
Comment removed
arbitterm 1 year ago
That was awesome! Steve Martin is great!
aGuy 1 year ago
LMAO. OMG, this is priceless. I love Steve Martin now.
jaflizard 1 year ago 26
This is funny?
ZupraVisor 1 year ago
This is awesome! You must have been front row! We were back at the campsite and heard it on the radio...so cool to see it on you tube. Nice video.
aburtch 1 year ago
Yo, damnthedog -- fix the spelling of "Atheists" in your video title -- it will make it easier for folks to find your version, which is the clearest and best on YouTube.
caraphyllis 1 year ago
Great fun Nancy, it's really nice to hear you giggling away as well lol...
Mark......
gerdenshed 1 year ago 2
@gerdenshed I was definitely giggling! But this is not my vid, Mark! Very glad to find that somebody captured this moment! NAncy
merlefest2010 1 year ago
It was HILARIOUS!!! He had us in tears! So glad you caught this!!!
NAncy
merlefest2010 1 year ago
@merlefest2010
Oops I thought this was your video Nancy ;0)
Mark....
gerdenshed 1 year ago
nice! thanks!
kakamoonie 1 year ago
I was There ! It was Great !
Thanks !
CaribianaJoe 1 year ago
THANK you for posting this!! I want to learn this song! I was there, and looks like somewhere right near you. You didn't by any chance get video of the back of that bass, did you?? If so, please post!!
lisabethweber 1 year ago
YAY! Thanks for posting this. I love me some Steve Martin!!!
poptartgoddess 1 year ago