islam is the deceit of satan know this that islam has NOTHING to offer to people: no salvation (you are not sure of your salvation unless you murder innocent people and die as martyrs), no hope, no love of god, no relationship with God, you are allah's slaves. christians are saved, they are children of God and have relationship with God. islam is rituals and bows to the black stone. christiniaty is love relationship. what a difference!! Jesus is God and He said Himself He is God
1. The Burqa Covers Up Abuse. 87% of women abused in Muslim world in Pakiland it goes up to 90%
2. The Burqa Justifies Sexual Assault on Women Who Don’t Wear It. Burqa divides women into "good girls” & "whores” and gives potential rapists, religious ammunition for their crimes
3. Civic Participation. In Islam women are not meant to be recognized as individuals, or make their own decisions
4. Segregation is Discrimination. Koran says,“Men have authority over women", bigoted creed
@miladmeah everywhere I go, any video especially that relates to Islam has some people commenting against the faith. "The women are abused", "the women are oppressed", the women this and that. Have you ever approached a Muslim women? spoken to one? Sadly there are people who abuse, oppress women but that is not on the basis of religion and something not unique to "Muslims". Segregation is not common in Islam alone. Go and do your research!
@miladmeah Can you justify the ignorant actions of these few people from the Holy Scriptures? NO! The verses you mentioned have not been understood and DON'T actually support what you claim. In the Quran it says to be modest and cover your head. It didn't say to cover your eyes, face etc. it depends on some people'd own choice or interpretation. And the wrong claims you make about no equality is proven in the Holy Quran: chapter 33 verse 35. I suggest you read it and hopefully get enlightened!
@miladmeah Can you justify the ignorant actions of these few people from the Holy Scriptures? NO! The verses you mentioned have not been understood and DON'T actually support what you claim. In the Quran it says to be modest and cover your head. It didn't say to cover your eyes, face etc. it depends on some people'd own choice or interpretation. And the wrong claims you make about no equality is proven in the Holy Quran: chapter 33 verse 35. I suggest you read it and hopefully get enlightened!
Quran 72:9 And we used to sit therein in positions for hearing [where? On the ceiling of the roof trying to enter heaven Q72:8.
The Jinns saw Muhammad sitting under a tree felt sorry for him and started to listen to his Quran verses Q 72:1
Was not Mohammed known to the devils every day while he
was reciting verses of the Quran at Mecca?
If devils watch everything happening on earth and report to Satan, why wouldn't the Jinn-devils learn about Muhammad before that day when he sat under the tree?
SubhaanAllaah, salafiyyah is not about outward appearance. I wear niqaab, am I salafi? My husband wears a thoub, has a beard & wears his pants above his ankles, is he upon the haqq? Was tawheed mentioned ONCE in this video? I know of a soofee who wears niqaab and Abaya - she worships her shaykh (aoothubillah), How about we call to tawheed & warn about shirk instead of pushing niqaab, abaya, beard, isbaal etc... Allaah alone is worthy of our worship & our supplications. He alone we ask for help.
" first believe.. the Quran..the sunnah.. " - why should any sane, rightminded, educated person believe that repressive, backward, crock of evil shit?
those scarfs are stupid and ugly. i dont understund why should women cover their hair or even face, its just stupid. who cares about their hair and faces. and why man dont have to cover, whats the fucking difference? man and woman are equal, and thats the fact. Islam is against the human rights. I would never wear anything so stupid and ugly, couse I dont have to. Anyone does´nt have to. Ind killing a woman or a man is wrong, doesnt matter who tey fuck or what they wear.
We will soon show them Our signs in the Universe and in their own souls, until it will become quite clear to them that it is the truth. Is it not sufficient as regards your Lord that He is a witness over all things?
JUST LOOK AT THIS STUPID MUSLIM.COVERED THE WAY SHE IS .WHAT A FOOL HOW CAN ANYONE IN THE RIGHT FRAME OF MIND WORSHIP AN EVIL BLOOD THIRSTY OMEN LIKE ALLAH.THEY WILL GO TO HELL.THE ONLY WAY TO HEAVEN AND TO GOD IS THROUGH JESUS CHRIST.EVERYONE KNOWS THIS.
..."So as for those in whose hearts there is a deviation (from the truth) they follow that which is not entirely clear thereof, seeking Al-Fitnah (polytheism and trials, etc.), and seeking for its hidden meanings, but none knows its hidden meanings save Allâh. And those who are firmly grounded in knowledge say: "We believe in it; the whole of it (clear and unclear verses) are from our Lord." And none receive admonition except men of understanding. (Tafsir At-Tabarî). (Aali Imran 3:7)
Read this (rather long) verse, may Allah guide you: "It is He Who has sent down to you (Muhammad SAW) the Book (this Qur'ân). In it are verses that are entirely clear, they are the foundations of the Book [and those are the verses of Al-Ahkâm (commandments, etc.), Al-Farâ'id (obligatory duties) and Al-Hudud (legal laws for the punishment of thieves, adulterers, etc.)]; and others not entirely clear." [continues.....]
@StickingToHaqq "authentic proofs": authentic proof is quite hard to define, isn't it? Say that one accepts 'authentic proof', not because he understands it but because his peers tell him to. Is he 'saved'? Well no. On the other hand, there are issues with e.g. scientific claims, with the lack of historical research regarding the Quran, interpretations... One can never say what is authentic. Accepting is not identical to being good. Live is too complex to be reduced to 'authentic' proof...
Thirdly, this hadith alone proves that the best person to follow is Rasoolullaah sallaahu alayhi wa salam himself. He is the best of salaf. And it is reported in Musnad Ahmad (4/130, 202 & 344) and by at-Tirmithi in a lengthy hadith, from Harith al-Ashari that Rasoolullaah sallaahu alayhi wa salam said:
so call with the call of Allaah which Allaah gave you al-Muslimeen, al-Mumineen, Ibaadullaah.
This is what I dont understand, if the Quran is supposedly a divine perfect text, everyone should be able to understand the message, the message should be simple enough for everyone to understand and complex enough to satisfy them all. The makes of this video obviously admit this perfect book is fallable, hence having to defend their beleiefe because this book failed to deliver. Whilst there is 1 unbeliever on this eath, this book cannot (by definition), be perfect.
2 : a system of religious beliefs and ritual; also : its body of adherents
3 : a religion regarded as unorthodox or spurious; also : its body of adherents
4 : a system for the cure of disease based on dogma set forth by its promulgator
5 a : great devotion to a person, idea, object, movement, or work (as a film or book); especially : such devotion regarded as a literary or intellectual fad b : the object of such devotion
May Allah be with the ones who unite the Muslims and may Allah destroy the ones who divide the Muslims. brother just said this Masjid is a salafi masjid. Mashallah, Islam is becoming like Christianity this is a baptist church, this is a catholic church, this is a Mormon church. Call urself Muslim period. Follow Allah, Muhammad (saws), companions, and Majority of the Scholars.
The Prophet (salla Allahu 'alayhi wa sallam) said, 'My Ummah will split into 73 sects: all of them will go to the Fire except for one.' He was asked which group this is whereupon he ('alayhis-salam) answered: 'Those who are upon what I and my companions are upon today.'
So, we stick to the truth. And there is no unity except upon truth. We can not simply call ourselves Muslims when deviations and misguidances have occurred in the ummah. Truth is separated from falsehood, walhamdulillah.
Even the raafidhah and other sects similar to that claim to be Muslims. They also claim to be upon the Qur'an and the Sunnah. But what distinguishes us from them is that we follow the way of the Pious Predecessors (as-Salaf as-Salih). And the Qur'an and the Sunnah is to be interpreted in the correct way, the way of the Salaf. So instead of saying 'I am a Muslim who is upon the Qur'an and Sunnah with the understanding of the Salaf', simply say that you are a Salafee and adhere to Salafiyyah.
Salafi is not allowed if said in a spirit of tribalism or sectarianism, because such attitudes are forbidden: Jaabir ibn Abd-Allaah said: A man from the Muhaajireen shoved a man from the Ansaar from behind, so each mans people gathered around him, saying O Muhaajireen (come and help)! or O Ansaar (come and help)! News of this reached the Prophet (SAW) and he said, Stop this, for it is repulsive. Then he said, What is this call of the people of jaahiliyyah?
Literal meaning salafism isnt the problem. But the consequence of being fanatic and biased to the modern salafi movement is the problem. When modern wahabis scholars say the ummah are divided into salaf and khalaf. This statement is a problem. This promotes secterism and division among ahul sunnah wa jummah. And they based their division on ijtihads. If your dont agree with wahabi fatwas then your are a khalaf. This leads to disdaining individuals who are not part of the modern salafi tribe.
The division is a fact, and it is mentioned in the hadith.
There is no modern or old Salafiyyah. There is one Salafiyyah, and that is the manhaj and the aqeedah that were brought forth from the early generations.
The Prophet ('alayhis-salatu was-salam) said that there will not cease to be a group from his Ummah that is upon the truth.
There will always be those, even if it may only be one person, that stick to the truth and the correct aqeedah.
Yes. But we should not break into different sects intentionally, each rejoicing on that which they are upon. So this action of MODERN Salafi is in fact sinful and not praiseworthy. Old salafi never called themselves salafi. The use of salafi words in ahadeeth and quran is a linguistic one meaning forerunner or precedents. Thus is is no benefit of calling one salafi except asabiya (fanaticism).so call with the call of Allaah which Allaah gave you al-Muslimeen, al-Mumineen, Ibaadullaah.
We are not breaking into different sects. We are remaning upon the one true group, and the one true aqeedah that our Salaf were upon. Then whosoever breaks into anything other than the manhaj of the Salaf, then THOSE are to blame and not us.
Yes but the salaf never called themself salafi. They called themselves Muslim period. Thus, in this particular aspect we are not following the true aqeedah.
Our salaf didn't call themselves salaf because they didn't have to. As for the Prophet 'alayhis-salatu was-salam, he actually said in a hadith to Faatimah (radhiya Allahu anha): "In deed I am a blessed Salaf for you."
Back then, all were upon one aqeedah. There was no need for calling oneself a Salafee.
Today, we have all these misguided sects around us; thus to separate the true aqeedah from the false ones, we ascribe ourselves to our Salaf-us-Salih.
As a Muslim you should ascribe oneself to salaf-us-salah after quran and sunnah. That isn't the problem here. The problem is it permissible for a Muslim to call himself salafi? the answer is no. Quran order us to call ourselves Muslims only. Prophet (saw) said: so call with the call of Allah which Allah gave you al-Muslimeen, al-Mumineen, Ibaadullaah. Salaf us salah never called themselves salafi. During salaf-us-salah time, they had misguided sects such as kharajites, sabaeen, etc but
Salaf-us-salah kept calling themselves Muslims only. They could have said we want to separate ourselves from these misguided sects and call ourselves something else but they never did because calling yourself a name other than Muslim is innovation. ascribing to them is not the same thing as naming your self salafi. You ascribe to them via their understanding of Islam. Calling onself salafi is a from jahiliya as it creates assabiya.
Assabiya means supporting his people to whom he belongs, whether they are right or wrong, oppressing or oppressed. The belonging to these people can be due to kith and kin, ethnicity, color, birthplace, citizenship, school of thought, or a group of people with common interest.
It is permissible to call oneself a Salafee, as the 'ulama have mentioned, with the purpose of distinguishing oneself from the innovators that exist today, and thus separating truth from falsehood.
The salaf-us-Salih did not have to call themselves "salafees", because THEY WERE THE SALAF.
To say that you are a Salafee, the letter 'ya' in the end is used when you "adhere". Thus, we adhere to our Salaf.
The latter Salaf called themselves ahl-us-Sunnah, and al-Jama'ah, ahl-ul-Hadeeth etc.
Your are so biased to wat an ulam say more than wat Allah, Prohpet, Sahabah, or majority of Muslim scholars say. The Sahaba could have took your route and say that we need to distinguish ourselves from innovators (yes, innovators existed during sahaba times) by calling themselves different name but they NEVER did. They called themselves Muslim and followed Quran and Sunnah (their actions distinguished them). U adhere to them via adhering to their actions not via naming (which is an innovation).
The further down you go down the generations, the Salaf-us-Salih started labelling themselves as ahl-us-Sunnah, ahl-ul-Athar etc. And they declared certain deviant individuals to be mubtadi'oon.
The Companions shared ONE aqeedah.
Stop following your lusts and stick to the Jama'ah. To label yourself a Salafee is praiseworthy.
Distinguishing truth from falsehood is not an innovation. Rather it is from the basics of Islam and the Sunnah of the prophets.
I am not biased. Allah 'azza wa djall has ordered us to ask those who possess knowledge (the 'ulama) in various issues. Rather, the one being biased is the one who refuses accepting what the 'ulama says after they bring forwards authentic proofs from the Qur'an, Sunnah and athar of the Salaf-us-Salih.
@StickingToHaqq "authentic proofs": authentic proof is quite hard to define, isn't it? Say that one accepts 'authentic proof', not because he understands it but because his peers tell him to. Is he 'saved'? Well no. On the other hand, there are issues with e.g. scientific claims, with the lack of historical research regarding the Quran, interpretations... One can never say what is authentic. Accepting is not identical to being good. Live is too complex to be reduced to 'authentic' proof...
@dakodar@dakodar The Muhaddithoon show what is authentic and what is not. They have a deep insight in the studies of Hadeeth and the knowledge of men (`Ilm-ur-Rijaal, knowing which ones are trustworthy in the chains of narrations etc), and they are able to distinguish the authentic ahadeeth from the unauthentic ones.
And an advice to you is to stop philosophising, for verily that will only lead oneself to further confusion. This noble religion is Islaam, not philosophy.
@StickingToHaqq So you actaually ask me to stop thinking?! So you tell me to trust others?! So you tell me that despite the fact that the Quran says to think, that I should stop doing so? So you tell me: whatever you say, stop reflecting and believe other ones interpretations? So you say that others simply have the authority to tell me what to do, not based on evidence but simply because you as a sheep accept that they knpw? Not sure that's written in the Quran is it? No, I never will, I think!
@dakodar Do not put words in my mouth please. This noble religion is Islaam. And in it is pure and clear guidance. We don't base our belief on anything EXCEPT that which was revealed unto us from the Lord of the universe.
No one has told you to be a "sheep". But in Islaam, the guidance is clear, and you follow that guidance. Questioning everything will lead you to confusion and thereafter to deviation from the truth.
@StickingToHaqq In other words, you can claim whatever you want, but there is no reason to believe that you know better than the many scholars who studied the book most likely more than you do (being professional scholars). So, though it's good for you that you find peace in your version, there is no good argument for others to accept you (and those you follow) are correct. It could be so that only 1 sect will flourish, yet nothing hints to the fact which is actually correct. Good luck!
@dakodar Who said that I know better than scholars? Once again, don't put words into my mouth please.
It seems as if you are not searching for the truth, and I am not here to debate with you but rather to clarify that which you are asking about. May Allah guide you.
@StickingToHaqq If all was so clear and very obvious, then how come there are so many different opinions on wearing a hijab, niqab, veil or nothing? If it all is so very authentic, then how come a lot of Muslims will disagree with you on so many levels? Because the Quran requires interpretation and you might disagree about these. In other words, 'authentic' is something you define as X and someone else as Y. So your opinion is absolutely perfect then, and thus authentic? Never stop thinking!
@StickingToHaqq 1. "because many of the Muslims have deviated from the true": I guess you then have 'the' true version. All should come to talk to you then.
2. "guidance is clear": well, not true as seen in the various interpretations. But then again, you disregard that argument cause you, as true follower, know the truth about Islam
3. "will lead you to confusion": so here you indeed state that questioning and thinking (mentioned in the Quran btw) is not good. So you follow...
If you have learnt about the deviated sects that exist in Islaam, then you will know that they deviated only after having philosophised about various verses. For example, they used their intellects to understand the Attributes and Names of Allah, which led to them becoming confused and thus DENYING them. Here you have a clear example of people going astray because of philosophy.
@StickingToHaqq "a clear example of people going astray because of philosophy": So how do you go about 'finding the truth' then? You simply read, listen to none and make up your own version? Or do you talk about it with others? Surprise: talking to others about religion and the interpretation of those words is philosophizing. Philosophy does not only happen in a library or school. Forgot about people telling you the meaning of words? What they mean, how you should understand them...
@dakodar When you want to understand a verse, you refer back to the Book of Allah, the Sunnah of the Prophet ´alayhis-salaam and the Righteous Predecessors (as-Salaf as-Saalih). Then you will gain a correct understanding of this religion. For verily the correct understanding is found therein.
@StickingToHaqq I don't think you actually understand what I refer to. I refer to real-live situations who demand an interpretation. Surely, not 'every' situation is described, not 'all' situations are descrined. Hence, you require 'thinking' (call it philosophy if you want) to apply the rules. Hence, you divert and might make mistakes. The claim that you NEVER make mistakes, cause your understanding is perfect is simplistic and dangerous (cause arrogant and dominant).
@StickingToHaqq No, I debate since I disagree with you, and I use arguments to show you. It's as with all 'believers' who are so convinced they're right: as soon as they find out they have no arguments, they simply claim "Poeha, I'm right anyway, whatever you say". It's good for you that you have guidance, your choice. But if I'm told to stop thinking, I think back of history and see the many consequences when people followed leaders 'who knew best'.
@dakodar Ahl-us-Sunnah wal Jama´ah have the true version of Islaam. They follow the guidance from their Lord, the Book of Allah and the Sunnah of the Prophet (salla Allahu ´alayhi wa sallam), as understood by the three first generations - as-Salaf as-Saalih. This is the guidance, and it is clear for you to follow it.
@StickingToHaqq "Ahl-us-Sunnah wal Jama´ah have the true version of Islaam": there we have it! Finally you simply provide no arguments whatsoever and are only about defending your views. Good for you to find peace, but it's a false believe that you are sure. You, as a person, rely fully on those who represent your sect. You even confess not to think about it too much, cause it might compromise your thoughts. I always am wary about such simple acceptance and even more if they try to enforce it.
@dakodar I provided arguments if you would only read them. I mentioned to you TWO AHADEETH from the Messenger of Allah salla Allahu ´alayhi wa sallam wherein he explained that there will be a group steadfast upon the truth - AL- JAMA´AH.
I rely FULLY on the Noble Prophet and the Slave of Allah, Muhammad ibn ´Abdillaah (salla Allahu ´alayhi wa sallam). And I base my belief completely upon that which was revealed unto him (´alayhis-salaam).
@StickingToHaqq "I provided arguments": no you did not. The only argument I read is that there will be sects who will be wrong. You did, and can't, provide arguments that you are part of the sect that is right. Simply stating that 'there is one true sect' does not mean that you're in that sect. I can only hope you will not aggressively impose it to others. It's scary to hear people say that thinking is wrong. Human kind heart that too much, mostly with very bad consequences.
@dakodar IN ANOTHER NARRATION of the hadeeth that I mentioned earlier, when the Companions asked the Prophet ´alayhis-salaam which sect this true sect is then he answered: "Those who are upon that which I and my Companions are upon today".
This is a clear, extremely clear indication that the only true guidance is by following the Prophet and his Companions who understood the religion better than any others after them.
There you go. And that is all I have to say. The guidance is clear.
@StickingToHaqq "Those who are upon that which I and my Companions are upon today": see again, no argument. You simply say: we should follow this. But you have not yet provided any argument to show that ALL your interpretations are right. Btw, every sect makes that claim, every Muslim believes he's on the right path, every scholar tries to comply. So ALL are wrong, and you're so very right just because you tell me you are? Would you believe me if I tell you: accept that I'm a pink unicorn! No..
@dakodar The Prophet (salallaahu 'alaihi wa sallam) said: "A group of my Ummah (nation) shall remain steadfast, on the truth, victorious, unharmed by those who oppose them, and do not support them, until the death or until the Day of Resurrection."
The Prophet ´alayhis-salaatu was-salaam said: "My Ummah will split up into seventy-three sects, all of them will be in the Fire except one sect." They asked: "Which one, O Messenger of Allah? He replied: "Al-Jama`ah (the true followers of the Prophet)."
And if you read the athar of the Salaf, the further down our Salaf went down the generations when innovations started occurring, they actually started distuingishing themselves from the innovators by labelling them as ahl-ul-Bid'ah and mubtadi'ah.
What the Salafiyyun are doing today is the exact same thing.
O you who have believed, fear Allaah as He should be feared and do not die except as Muslims. And hold firmly to the rope of Allaah all together and do not become divided. And remember the favor of Allaah upon you when you were enemies and He brought your hearts together and you became, by His favor, brothers. And you were on the edge of a pit of the Fire, and He saved you from it. Thus does Allaah make clear to you His verses that you may be guided. [aali 'Imraan 3:102-103]
Firstly, Allaah taala has clearly prohibited the Muslims from breaking into differing sects intentionally, each rejoicing on that which they are upon. So this action of theres is in fact sinful and not praiseworthy.Secondly, if calling yourself salafi was to be derived from this hadith, Fatima [ra] would have been the first one to use it. Since Rasoolullaah sallaahu alayhi wa salam was directing this towards her.
None of the generations that Rasoolullaah sallaahu alayhi wa salam praised, referred to themselves as salafis saying they follow the salaf. They all called themselves Muslims, in accordance with the Sunnah. So this claim is void of any substance.The use of statements of some la as ibn Taymiyyah and adh-Dhahabi. This does not require any criticism as sayings of scholars is not evidence and their opinions are not binding upon the Ummah.
And your statement that since times have changed and many sects have emerged. It is obligatory to identify and separate ourselves from these deviant sects (deviant in their eyes), is in fact an innovated belief and method. There existed sects amongst the previous nations, such as amongst the followers of Eesa ibn Mariam [as], and also during the time of the Sahaabah [ra]. Yet, they still referred themselves as Muslims; since this is what Allah taala had named us.
But when Jesus felt disbelief from them, he said, Who are my supporters for Allaah? The disciples said, We are supporters for Allaah. We have believed in Allaah and testify that we are Muslims.
And in ayah 78 of aali Imraan:
It is He Who has named you Muslims both before and in this
And the hadith reported by Abu Dawud from Furat ibn Hayyan [ra]Rasoolullaah sallaahu alayhi wa salam commanded to kill him: he was a spy of Abu Sufyan and an ally of a man of the Ansar. He passed a circle of the Ansar and said: I am a Muslim. A man from the Ansar said, Rasoolullaah, he is saying that he is a Muslim. Rasoolullaah sallaahu alayhi wa salam said: There are people among you in whose faith we trust. Furat ibn Hayyan is one of them.
From this I can conclude, calling towards this label of salafiya is indeed against the Sunnah and it is a call of jaahiliya which holds no benefit. And calling oneself Muslim is the right way and in accordance to the Sunnah.
The Muslims should definitely not be divided. Rather they must divide upon the truth and the one and only correct aqeedah, which is the aqeedah and the way of our Salaf-us-Salih.
However, the Prophet 'alayhis-salam said that the Ummah would split into 73 sects, all of them going to the Fire except for one. Thus, if you want to remain upon the truth, then stick to the correct way - the way of ahl-us-Sunnah wal jama'ah.
Yes. You said you follow the way of salaf-us-salah. Did the salaf-us-salih call themselves salaf. Did Abu Baker, Omar, Othman, Ali, riduallah anhum call themselves salafies? surely not. They call themselves Muslims period. In ayah 78 of aali Imraan:
It is He Who has named you Muslims both before and in this
They didn't HAVE TO call themselves anything other than Muslims, because back then the Companions were upon ONE AQEEDAH.
Today there is bid'ah and deviation everywhere! You have the tablighiyyun, the sufiyyun, the raafidhah, the khawaarij - you have loads of sects that have gone astray from the true aqeedah that the Companions were upon.
Do you now understand why we must adhere to our Salaf?
Ibn Taymiyyah rahimahullah surely is evidence, I think you misinterpreted his saying.
And this is the way of the Companions (radhiya Allahu anhum) and the methodology that they learnt from our Noble Prophet (salla Allahu 'alayhi wa sallam).
Separating truth from falsehood is the reason why Books and Messengers were revealed; separate the truth from falsehood, tawheed from shirk, etc. So whosoever turns away from ahl-us-Sunnah wal Hadeeth, and as-Salafiyyah, then that individual has left the truth and the blame is upon him for dividing himself from the Jama'ah.
And your statement that since times have changed and many sects have emerged. It is obligatory to identify and separate ourselves from these deviant sects, is in fact an innovated belief and method. There existed sects (Kharajities, Sabaeen, etc.) during the time of the Sahaabah [ra]. Yet, they still referred themselves as Muslims; since this is what Allah taala had named us.
lbn Taymiyyah (d.728H) - rahimahullaah - said: "There is no criticism for the one who proclaims the way (madhdhab) of the Salaf, who attaches himself to it and refers to it. Rather, it is obligatory to accept that from him by unanimous agreement (Ittifaaq) because the way (madhdhab) of the Salaf is nothing but the Truth (Haqq)." [Majmoo al-Fataawaa 4:149]
These statements by ibn Taymiyyah rahimahullah is not evidence and his opinions are not binding upon the Ummah. Also to note, nowhere does ibn Taymiyyah state that calling yourself salafi is permissible. He is just saying (its very obvious what he is saying) That there is no criticism who proclaim the way of salaf (Forerunners or precedents sahaba RA), attaches to it, or refers to it. He doesnt say its permissible to call onself salafi. it so clear subhanallah.
I'm glad they are pre-occupying themselves with such nonsense. This would give all the rest of us to excel in life and nail them if they deviate from the civil discourse of society.
assalamu'alaikum yaa akhi....keep strong in the way who our prophet Muhammad shalallohu alaihi wassalam and sahabah radiyallohhum ajma'in and all imams ahlussunah..my best love from your ikhwah(brother) in indonesia,may have your email or website to cantact you all?thanks wassalam
That Bint Robert looks like a puppet bobbing up and down like summat not right, coz tho she's talking we can't see her mouth move and it just looks like she's weird. Well, to dress like that she IS weird.
Islam teaches MURDER, to KILL for Allah in order to enter the Islamic paradise!!.
sura 9 : 111 Allah hath purchased of the Believers their persons and their goods; for theirs (in return) is the Garden (of Paradise): they FIGHT in HIS CAUSE(they kill for Allah), and KILL and they are KILLED
quran, Sura[24:02]The woman and the man guilty of adultery or fornication, - flog each of them with a hundred stripes: Let not compassion move you in their case, in a matter prescribed by Allah, if ye believe in Allah and the Last Day:and let a party of the Believers witness their punishment
CUTTING HANDS AND FEET sura 5:33 AND 5:38 ALL GREAT IN ISLAM!
read the full story before just taking out one part or construe everything. Show me you really know islam, not just a bunch of half narrations, and poor cause an effect relationships.
Some people from the tribe of 'Ukl came to the Prophet and embraced Islam. The climate of Medina did not suit them, so the Prophet ordered them to go to the (herd of milch) camels of charity and to drink, their milk and urine (as a medicine). They did so, and after they had recovered from their ailment (became healthy) they turned renegades (reverted from Islam) and killed the shepherd of the camels and took the camels away..
i assure you if it had been buddhists that committed 9/11 and 7/7, it would not have been muslims that felt they were being profiled in the aftermath. muslims committed these acts of terrorism and it's quite right that they should be profiled today.
You dont really know who did it, that is what cnn/fox told you! You were not the planes you dont even know bin laden, ALL YOU GOT IS WHAT MEDIA TOLD YOU. YOU ARE TOTALLY AT THEIR MERCY. I WATCHED LOOSE CHANGE. you cant be sure, and dont forget history repeats itself. the Japanese also were profiled during world war and they got reperations! apperently they didnt like being profiled either!
uh yea, and the media also tells me that israel is treating palestinians like shit... should i not believe that either? or should i just believe pro-muslim news reports? they have these guys on video tape... bank transactions and oral accounts of the passengers from flight 93. same thing with the london and madrid bombers. they were muslims... and they embodied the doctrine of islam. destroy all that is not muslim. islam is a religion of murder and hatred.
What i read acutally came from SECULAR NON MUSLIM GRASS ROOTS MEDIA, LIKE DEMOCRACY NOW, VILLIAGE VOICE, LOOSE CHANGE, etc. dont think cnn/fox gives a rats behind about you, its really corporate run media, i know people personally who worked in the media industry, journalism as we know it is being threatened by these corporations becuase we are not being heard, you are being told, if you disagree with me google the lyrics of FRANK ZAPPA'S "i'm the slime" this is the truth.
Islam is like a public toilet - you can piss in it, you can shit in it, you can wipe your ass in it, you can even have a wank in it - but eventually you have to leave because of the gut wrenching stink of ass and piss.
I fear nothing, especially your so called allah and your so called prophet mohammed (piss be upon him).
If you want to listen to this Bajan idiot and his friend in this video. that is up to you, but I have a perfect right to say what I like on youtube same as you.
Next time you see any comment from me, just shut up little man.
Now go and wash your dirty asshole - its time to pray to your dog (sorry god).....LOL
Fraithfreedom is an anti islam site, so is islam hope, they are saying fraithfreedom but they twist and take many verses of the quran out of context, leaving large gaps in historical events to make islam look like the current issues, insiuating that al-qaida, taliban, etc are true teachings of islam, hense kill them all! its to preach hate so dont listen to them.
moorejr1400,If you think they at Faithfreedom are wrong then prove them they are wrong and they promise to shut down the site. Out of 1.5 billion muslims not even one has succeeded , I wonder why? Because Islam lies as do the muslims. People all over the world have now realised how evil Islam is and started to fight back. Buddhists in the South of Thailand have been now armed by the Thai Govt,so they can fight back Muslims there.Islam is EVIL as are the Muslims. You days are numbered.
shes attractive isnt she...she really knows how to work that 9 th century satans postbox. outfit..you go girl..work that buka!...does anyone think her bomb looked big in that?
you are the biggest joke, actually speak to some producers in holly wood, you may just get your own sitcom entitled: "westernvaluesdefense comedy hour" it run 10 seasons!!! who knows?
Muslims think that barbarism, chopping hands and feet, murder is good!religionofpeace?HAHAHAHAH
Sura (5:33) - "The punishment of those who wage war against Allah and His messenger and strive to make mischief in the land is only this, that they should be MURDERED or CRUCIFIED or their HANDS and their FEET should be CUT OFF on opposite sides or they should be imprisoned; this shall be as a disgrace for them in this world, and in the hereafter they shall have a grievous chastisement"
allah said 'if u hav dispute among each other, refer back to ALLAH and his messenger', not early generation so brother i fink u need to read that ayat again.
"When there comes to them some matter touching (Public) safety or fear, they divulge it. If they had only referred it to the Messenger, or to those charged with authority among them, the proper investigators would have Tested it from them (direct). Were it not for the Grace and Mercy of Allah unto you, all but a few of you would have fallen into the clutches of Satan. "
yer and the one who hav authority over the muslim is non but Khalifa not the alim, the profet clearly stated this and said this isue belong to the Quraysh so dont me tell me that i dont know wot im sayin, and wen it comes to hukum shar'i we refer back ALLAH and his messenger
why do i bother with the ignorance wot type of point is that, even if the video said sahaba but the point is that Qur'an never mention to go back to the sahabas
The "prophet" Mohammed was a mass murderer, rapist, pillager, terrorist and pedophile who, in his 50s, had sexual relations with a 9-year-old girl, his thirteenth wife Aiyesha - Aiyesha is quoted in the Hadith, a commentary on the life of Mohammed considered no less sacred than the Koran itself by 1.2 billion Muslims around the world: "Narrated Aiyesha: That the prophet wrote the marriage contract with her when she was six years old, and he consummated his marriage when she was nine years old."
blow the fucking pussy shaped Hajra-e-Aswad stone in the fucking black stone called Kabba in that fucking Mecca with a Hydrogen Bomb during Hajj to get rid of this fucking evil ideology called islam
that is correct, it is THE GOD, forgot the mention the definite article, so Allah fully vocalized is Allahu WHICH IS THE GOD, THE ONLY TRUE GOD, ONLY HIM, AND IT CANNOT BE MADE PLURAL OR FEMININE, NO GENDER, ONE GOD, and no human can possess this name if so abdu has to come before it such as Abdullah, the same goes for the rest of the devine attributes.
so . when one of us "american" goes and do some stupid , like the shit you have done and will keep on doing , at that case we are the worst nation ever ... wake up you idiot .. dont judge a nation based on out of hand idiots like you
The lady in black mentions that mohammed was a perfect example of who we should follow as muslims. He married a 6 year old girl when he was 54; this is a big crime against chilhood. Please do not follow his example
buffgirl1986 You butthead who are u to ask ppl not to follow the prophet? People like u with sh*t in their mind are still bubbling and parroting the same old story that the prophet married a 6y.o girl and that's a crime. You ignorant stupid whore u better count how many bastards u slept with. That's better for u than speaking ill of the honest and the clean..
Second, he married her at 6 and didn't touch her until she was 9 and there are a lot of proofs which say that 9y.o girls at that time were complete women, esp that they were in Sahara where the weather is hot. Even now, in India, a hot country, some girls get married at 8y.o.
You are pathetic. Each and every muslim man I have spoken to in person is even more ignorant and messed up as you. It is like talking to a brick wall! "9y.o girls at that time were complete women" WHAT? Get some help sir.. A 54 yr old sleeping with a 6 or 9 yr or even 13 year old child is a peadophile. If you had an underaged daughter would you give her to an old man? It does not matter if he is the messenger of god or santa clause. I hope you do not do the same, you will go to hell for it.
HHAHAHA buffgirl1986 You are funny but stupid and ignorant. Yes for u i'm pathetic but for me u are very pathetic. Believe me u have no knowledge neither about history nor about human physiology and The female reproductive system. I bet u were the laziest at school. Also ur info about climate effects on humans body is 0%. I'd hope to see ur marks at school. You little monkey!
I'll show u how much lazy and ignorant u are. But then u should . Look at this wikipedia page. You'll find statistics about the age at which males & females get married around the world at present. Notice that it differs from one place to another bcz many factors control the matter. See that in Russia for example girls can marry at 14 ??? WHAT??? Yes baby they do ..
So, if Russia is a very cold country and at present girls can get married there at 14 then why can't u accept that girls can get married at 9 more than 14 centuries before and in Sahara which is a very hot place, knowing that genetic and environmental factors affect the pubertal timing greatly???!
Ok, calm down..Why do u have to type 10 messages when we only need 1 response? Sure a 14 year old girl in Russia or elsewhere can marry. Will she marry a 17 year old boy or will she marry a 54 year old man? If you have a 6 or 9 year old child now/in future, will you give her hand to a 54 year old man? Thats all you have to answer without swearing, thanks.
If u want to know the real peadophiles u just close ur eyes and choose any old man in ur country and ask him how many little girls he raped!! If an old man (the prophet) married a 9y.o girl 14 centuries ago where it was normal then he is a peadophile. But if the bastards in ur country rape 9y.o girls everyday then they are free and civilized!!.. Yes, i have to type 10 msgs bcz some ppl don't understand from 1 msg and u need to explain things fully so that they can grasp the meaning at the end
No, the old man would be found and put into prison as it is not allowed. There are many paedophiles and I am just worried that they would be attracted to islam as they can not only have sex with a child but marry one. Mohammed was a paedophile and you should not follow his example, end of story
"you should not follow his example, end of story".. HHAHAHA You see! You said before that talking to Muslims "is like talking to a brick wall" .. In fact, it's u who is a brick wall. I noticed this in ur 1st comment and that's why i called u a butthead. Well, civilized whore don't forget what i told u earlier .. Start looking for a dog or a donkey in ur area it would be of much benefit when u are thrown away after being well used!!
Sure you muslim fanatic go mental and do jihad on youtube! post 1000 responses.. I will type it again.. Mohammed was a Paedophile and no man should follow his example.
buffgirl1986 You are a catastrophe! Being weak in giving sound proof plus parroting the others' mickey mouse views, u should go burry yourself before i do jihad on u .. I'm a Muslim and much powerful than u, slapping u on the face with ur language and providing u with scientific info that u ignore .. hehehe.. civilized bitch! .. Plus, while u are the bastards' toilet, following the prophet Mohammed has made me clean and honest.. That's why many ppl in ur area embrace Islam everyday
you are such an idiot .... i switched to islam .. do you know why ... i was just like you ... i mis judged it . but once i knew that i understod it wrong and few are doing the islam wrong ... now i am in
If u check ur previous comments u would know that at the beginning u were against the idea that a 9y.o girl may be a complete woman .. You said: "9y.o girls at that time were complete women" WHAT?" .. Well, as i told u before many girls in India get married at the age of 8 and in some parts of the Rif region they get married at even 6y.o at present believe me. And most often the man's age is btwn 20 and 30 but in few cases he can be 50 and ppl there accept it with no objection
Also to say that a 54 y.o man sleeping with a 6 or 9 yr or even 13 year old child is a peadophile may be true in the present, but centuries back in history this wasn't a problem at all. Rather, it was something normal either among Muslims or Christians. But now bcz u've become civilized (hehehe) this seems unacceptable to u .. And in none of his teachings he tells women to marry at 9. On the contrary, he taught us not to force women to get married with someone they don't want.
This has been flagged as spam show
Malwina77ful 4 months ago
ALL KNOWING ALLAH 'CAN' BE BORN AS HUMAN
Quran 21 says no human sperm went into Mary. Jesus born is God (Allah)
WORDS COME OUT VIA BREATH. Q 21:19 Word made flesh
Q 21:19 What is MANIFESTED via Allah IS FLESH of ALLAH
Q 51:56 HUMANS! worship Allah (Jesus)
Q 21 WHAT IS BORN OF ALLAH is SON of allah
Humans are 3 in 1 (body, soul, conscience) SAME: FATHER, SON, HOLY SPIRIT
Muslim Allah is al-illah, Desert moon god Habul
Muslim Allah in Quran 14:4 Muhammad was sent for the dumb illiterate Arabs ONLY
miladmeah 5 months ago
Muhammad as a Pagan, practiced sex with a child
Is 9 year old child's vagina BIG ENOUGH TO TAKE THE DONKEY DICK OF A 52 yrs OLD MAN?
Muhammad's guilt in Quran 34:50 [WHO SUFFERS LOSS IF Muhammad was wrong?] Yes - All the Muslims in the world
Q 8:1; 20% of war loot belongs to Muhammad
Bukhari v3b37ch8n495p280 says“When Allah made the prophet wealthy through conquests” 1/5 of ALL spoils of war was put into treasury
($50k for Mosque @: Alisina.or g)
Arabic Originals & translations @: myspear.or g
miladmeah 5 months ago
1. The Burqa Covers Up Abuse. 87% of women abused in Muslim world in Pakiland it goes up to 90%
2. The Burqa Justifies Sexual Assault on Women Who Don’t Wear It. Burqa divides women into "good girls” & "whores” and gives potential rapists, religious ammunition for their crimes
3. Civic Participation. In Islam women are not meant to be recognized as individuals, or make their own decisions
4. Segregation is Discrimination. Koran says,“Men have authority over women", bigoted creed
'europenews.dk'
miladmeah 7 months ago
@miladmeah everywhere I go, any video especially that relates to Islam has some people commenting against the faith. "The women are abused", "the women are oppressed", the women this and that. Have you ever approached a Muslim women? spoken to one? Sadly there are people who abuse, oppress women but that is not on the basis of religion and something not unique to "Muslims". Segregation is not common in Islam alone. Go and do your research!
ImamTime 5 months ago
THE TRUE PATH OF ISLAM
Yes, drinking a glass of wine is sin, but killing a man for converting to Christian is a holy act worthy of paradise
Farag Foda (1946 - 8/6/1992) an important Egyptian thinker, human rights activist, was declared an apostate & foe of Islam. Shot dead in his office
Killing of Paki Gov S Taseer, S Bhatti & Rape of infidel Lara Logan in Egypt
Quran 9:73-74, 5:54 says kill apostates
MUSLIMS! - Being deceived by a false prophet does not bring Paradise, it brings hellfire
miladmeah 7 months ago
@miladmeah Can you justify the ignorant actions of these few people from the Holy Scriptures? NO! The verses you mentioned have not been understood and DON'T actually support what you claim. In the Quran it says to be modest and cover your head. It didn't say to cover your eyes, face etc. it depends on some people'd own choice or interpretation. And the wrong claims you make about no equality is proven in the Holy Quran: chapter 33 verse 35. I suggest you read it and hopefully get enlightened!
ImamTime 5 months ago
@miladmeah Can you justify the ignorant actions of these few people from the Holy Scriptures? NO! The verses you mentioned have not been understood and DON'T actually support what you claim. In the Quran it says to be modest and cover your head. It didn't say to cover your eyes, face etc. it depends on some people'd own choice or interpretation. And the wrong claims you make about no equality is proven in the Holy Quran: chapter 33 verse 35. I suggest you read it and hopefully get enlightened!
ImamTime 5 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Quran 72:9 And we used to sit therein in positions for hearing [where? On the ceiling of the roof trying to enter heaven Q72:8.
The Jinns saw Muhammad sitting under a tree felt sorry for him and started to listen to his Quran verses Q 72:1
Was not Mohammed known to the devils every day while he
was reciting verses of the Quran at Mecca?
If devils watch everything happening on earth and report to Satan, why wouldn't the Jinn-devils learn about Muhammad before that day when he sat under the tree?
miladmeah 5 months ago
SubhaanAllaah, salafiyyah is not about outward appearance. I wear niqaab, am I salafi? My husband wears a thoub, has a beard & wears his pants above his ankles, is he upon the haqq? Was tawheed mentioned ONCE in this video? I know of a soofee who wears niqaab and Abaya - she worships her shaykh (aoothubillah), How about we call to tawheed & warn about shirk instead of pushing niqaab, abaya, beard, isbaal etc... Allaah alone is worthy of our worship & our supplications. He alone we ask for help.
amazpadz 8 months ago
" first believe.. the Quran..the sunnah.. " - why should any sane, rightminded, educated person believe that repressive, backward, crock of evil shit?
freeman8128 9 months ago
those scarfs are stupid and ugly. i dont understund why should women cover their hair or even face, its just stupid. who cares about their hair and faces. and why man dont have to cover, whats the fucking difference? man and woman are equal, and thats the fact. Islam is against the human rights. I would never wear anything so stupid and ugly, couse I dont have to. Anyone does´nt have to. Ind killing a woman or a man is wrong, doesnt matter who tey fuck or what they wear.
MrTitnik 11 months ago
Allah said in the Quran
We will soon show them Our signs in the Universe and in their own souls, until it will become quite clear to them that it is the truth. Is it not sufficient as regards your Lord that He is a witness over all things?
waelhamad77 1 year ago
Take off your mask..
thiery572 1 year ago
Under islamic sharia law the age of consent for a girl is 9 YES nine years old!!!!
this is the law that they want on British soil ? stand up to the islamization of the UK,
support the English defence league !!!
bollox679 1 year ago
I'm sorry, all I could learn from this video is that an "unregistered user can only convert video with watermark".
LessthanJake14 1 year ago 2
This has been flagged as spam show
JUST LOOK AT THIS STUPID MUSLIM.COVERED THE WAY SHE IS .WHAT A FOOL HOW CAN ANYONE IN THE RIGHT FRAME OF MIND WORSHIP AN EVIL BLOOD THIRSTY OMEN LIKE ALLAH.THEY WILL GO TO HELL.THE ONLY WAY TO HEAVEN AND TO GOD IS THROUGH JESUS CHRIST.EVERYONE KNOWS THIS.
tarryarah 1 year ago
Comment removed
abdullahalmahmood 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Allahu Fuckbar
JenkemLover 1 year ago
..."So as for those in whose hearts there is a deviation (from the truth) they follow that which is not entirely clear thereof, seeking Al-Fitnah (polytheism and trials, etc.), and seeking for its hidden meanings, but none knows its hidden meanings save Allâh. And those who are firmly grounded in knowledge say: "We believe in it; the whole of it (clear and unclear verses) are from our Lord." And none receive admonition except men of understanding. (Tafsir At-Tabarî). (Aali Imran 3:7)
StickingToHaqq 1 year ago
Read this (rather long) verse, may Allah guide you: "It is He Who has sent down to you (Muhammad SAW) the Book (this Qur'ân). In it are verses that are entirely clear, they are the foundations of the Book [and those are the verses of Al-Ahkâm (commandments, etc.), Al-Farâ'id (obligatory duties) and Al-Hudud (legal laws for the punishment of thieves, adulterers, etc.)]; and others not entirely clear." [continues.....]
StickingToHaqq 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@StickingToHaqq "authentic proofs": authentic proof is quite hard to define, isn't it? Say that one accepts 'authentic proof', not because he understands it but because his peers tell him to. Is he 'saved'? Well no. On the other hand, there are issues with e.g. scientific claims, with the lack of historical research regarding the Quran, interpretations... One can never say what is authentic. Accepting is not identical to being good. Live is too complex to be reduced to 'authentic' proof...
dakodar 1 year ago
Ok sister Masha'allah!!!
Muslimprincess79 1 year ago
Thirdly, this hadith alone proves that the best person to follow is Rasoolullaah sallaahu alayhi wa salam himself. He is the best of salaf. And it is reported in Musnad Ahmad (4/130, 202 & 344) and by at-Tirmithi in a lengthy hadith, from Harith al-Ashari that Rasoolullaah sallaahu alayhi wa salam said:
so call with the call of Allaah which Allaah gave you al-Muslimeen, al-Mumineen, Ibaadullaah.
ai4170 2 years ago
Kill all muslims!!!
1991jerzy 2 years ago
1.6 billion that exist everywhere. Not practical. but thanks for the suggestion.
ai4170 2 years ago
I'd have to say that the enemy of my enemy is your friend.
wesharris6 2 years ago
Get this shit the fuck out of my country.
shashintokyo 2 years ago
The best way to learn Islam is to close your eyes, bend over and wait for a Mullah to shove his dick in your asshole from behind.
ahmedhusseinny 2 years ago
This is what I dont understand, if the Quran is supposedly a divine perfect text, everyone should be able to understand the message, the message should be simple enough for everyone to understand and complex enough to satisfy them all. The makes of this video obviously admit this perfect book is fallable, hence having to defend their beleiefe because this book failed to deliver. Whilst there is 1 unbeliever on this eath, this book cannot (by definition), be perfect.
lynus111 2 years ago
salafi's are murjia's (dallleeeeeeeen wa modillleeeeeen)
El7ajjaj1 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
CULT-
1 : formal religious veneration : worship
2 : a system of religious beliefs and ritual; also : its body of adherents
3 : a religion regarded as unorthodox or spurious; also : its body of adherents
4 : a system for the cure of disease based on dogma set forth by its promulgator
5 a : great devotion to a person, idea, object, movement, or work (as a film or book); especially : such devotion regarded as a literary or intellectual fad b : the object of such devotion
IslamistTube 2 years ago
May Allah be with the ones who unite the Muslims and may Allah destroy the ones who divide the Muslims. brother just said this Masjid is a salafi masjid. Mashallah, Islam is becoming like Christianity this is a baptist church, this is a catholic church, this is a Mormon church. Call urself Muslim period. Follow Allah, Muhammad (saws), companions, and Majority of the Scholars.
ai4170 2 years ago
The Prophet (salla Allahu 'alayhi wa sallam) said, 'My Ummah will split into 73 sects: all of them will go to the Fire except for one.' He was asked which group this is whereupon he ('alayhis-salam) answered: 'Those who are upon what I and my companions are upon today.'
So, we stick to the truth. And there is no unity except upon truth. We can not simply call ourselves Muslims when deviations and misguidances have occurred in the ummah. Truth is separated from falsehood, walhamdulillah.
StickingToHaqq 2 years ago
Even the raafidhah and other sects similar to that claim to be Muslims. They also claim to be upon the Qur'an and the Sunnah. But what distinguishes us from them is that we follow the way of the Pious Predecessors (as-Salaf as-Salih). And the Qur'an and the Sunnah is to be interpreted in the correct way, the way of the Salaf. So instead of saying 'I am a Muslim who is upon the Qur'an and Sunnah with the understanding of the Salaf', simply say that you are a Salafee and adhere to Salafiyyah.
StickingToHaqq 2 years ago
Salafi is not allowed if said in a spirit of tribalism or sectarianism, because such attitudes are forbidden: Jaabir ibn Abd-Allaah said: A man from the Muhaajireen shoved a man from the Ansaar from behind, so each mans people gathered around him, saying O Muhaajireen (come and help)! or O Ansaar (come and help)! News of this reached the Prophet (SAW) and he said, Stop this, for it is repulsive. Then he said, What is this call of the people of jaahiliyyah?
ai4170 2 years ago
Literal meaning salafism isnt the problem. But the consequence of being fanatic and biased to the modern salafi movement is the problem. When modern wahabis scholars say the ummah are divided into salaf and khalaf. This statement is a problem. This promotes secterism and division among ahul sunnah wa jummah. And they based their division on ijtihads. If your dont agree with wahabi fatwas then your are a khalaf. This leads to disdaining individuals who are not part of the modern salafi tribe.
ai4170 2 years ago
The division is a fact, and it is mentioned in the hadith.
There is no modern or old Salafiyyah. There is one Salafiyyah, and that is the manhaj and the aqeedah that were brought forth from the early generations.
The Prophet ('alayhis-salatu was-salam) said that there will not cease to be a group from his Ummah that is upon the truth.
There will always be those, even if it may only be one person, that stick to the truth and the correct aqeedah.
StickingToHaqq 2 years ago
Yes. But we should not break into different sects intentionally, each rejoicing on that which they are upon. So this action of MODERN Salafi is in fact sinful and not praiseworthy. Old salafi never called themselves salafi. The use of salafi words in ahadeeth and quran is a linguistic one meaning forerunner or precedents. Thus is is no benefit of calling one salafi except asabiya (fanaticism).so call with the call of Allaah which Allaah gave you al-Muslimeen, al-Mumineen, Ibaadullaah.
ai4170 2 years ago
We are not breaking into different sects. We are remaning upon the one true group, and the one true aqeedah that our Salaf were upon. Then whosoever breaks into anything other than the manhaj of the Salaf, then THOSE are to blame and not us.
StickingToHaqq 2 years ago
Yes but the salaf never called themself salafi. They called themselves Muslim period. Thus, in this particular aspect we are not following the true aqeedah.
ai4170 2 years ago
Brother, read what I am saying.
Our salaf didn't call themselves salaf because they didn't have to. As for the Prophet 'alayhis-salatu was-salam, he actually said in a hadith to Faatimah (radhiya Allahu anha): "In deed I am a blessed Salaf for you."
Back then, all were upon one aqeedah. There was no need for calling oneself a Salafee.
Today, we have all these misguided sects around us; thus to separate the true aqeedah from the false ones, we ascribe ourselves to our Salaf-us-Salih.
StickingToHaqq 2 years ago
As a Muslim you should ascribe oneself to salaf-us-salah after quran and sunnah. That isn't the problem here. The problem is it permissible for a Muslim to call himself salafi? the answer is no. Quran order us to call ourselves Muslims only. Prophet (saw) said: so call with the call of Allah which Allah gave you al-Muslimeen, al-Mumineen, Ibaadullaah. Salaf us salah never called themselves salafi. During salaf-us-salah time, they had misguided sects such as kharajites, sabaeen, etc but
ai4170 2 years ago
Salaf-us-salah kept calling themselves Muslims only. They could have said we want to separate ourselves from these misguided sects and call ourselves something else but they never did because calling yourself a name other than Muslim is innovation. ascribing to them is not the same thing as naming your self salafi. You ascribe to them via their understanding of Islam. Calling onself salafi is a from jahiliya as it creates assabiya.
ai4170 2 years ago
Comment removed
ai4170 2 years ago
Assabiya means supporting his people to whom he belongs, whether they are right or wrong, oppressing or oppressed. The belonging to these people can be due to kith and kin, ethnicity, color, birthplace, citizenship, school of thought, or a group of people with common interest.
ai4170 2 years ago
It is permissible to call oneself a Salafee, as the 'ulama have mentioned, with the purpose of distinguishing oneself from the innovators that exist today, and thus separating truth from falsehood.
The salaf-us-Salih did not have to call themselves "salafees", because THEY WERE THE SALAF.
To say that you are a Salafee, the letter 'ya' in the end is used when you "adhere". Thus, we adhere to our Salaf.
The latter Salaf called themselves ahl-us-Sunnah, and al-Jama'ah, ahl-ul-Hadeeth etc.
StickingToHaqq 2 years ago
Your are so biased to wat an ulam say more than wat Allah, Prohpet, Sahabah, or majority of Muslim scholars say. The Sahaba could have took your route and say that we need to distinguish ourselves from innovators (yes, innovators existed during sahaba times) by calling themselves different name but they NEVER did. They called themselves Muslim and followed Quran and Sunnah (their actions distinguished them). U adhere to them via adhering to their actions not via naming (which is an innovation).
ai4170 2 years ago
The further down you go down the generations, the Salaf-us-Salih started labelling themselves as ahl-us-Sunnah, ahl-ul-Athar etc. And they declared certain deviant individuals to be mubtadi'oon.
The Companions shared ONE aqeedah.
Stop following your lusts and stick to the Jama'ah. To label yourself a Salafee is praiseworthy.
Distinguishing truth from falsehood is not an innovation. Rather it is from the basics of Islam and the Sunnah of the prophets.
StickingToHaqq 2 years ago
I am not biased. Allah 'azza wa djall has ordered us to ask those who possess knowledge (the 'ulama) in various issues. Rather, the one being biased is the one who refuses accepting what the 'ulama says after they bring forwards authentic proofs from the Qur'an, Sunnah and athar of the Salaf-us-Salih.
StickingToHaqq 2 years ago
@StickingToHaqq "authentic proofs": authentic proof is quite hard to define, isn't it? Say that one accepts 'authentic proof', not because he understands it but because his peers tell him to. Is he 'saved'? Well no. On the other hand, there are issues with e.g. scientific claims, with the lack of historical research regarding the Quran, interpretations... One can never say what is authentic. Accepting is not identical to being good. Live is too complex to be reduced to 'authentic' proof...
dakodar 1 year ago
@dakodar @dakodar The Muhaddithoon show what is authentic and what is not. They have a deep insight in the studies of Hadeeth and the knowledge of men (`Ilm-ur-Rijaal, knowing which ones are trustworthy in the chains of narrations etc), and they are able to distinguish the authentic ahadeeth from the unauthentic ones.
And an advice to you is to stop philosophising, for verily that will only lead oneself to further confusion. This noble religion is Islaam, not philosophy.
StickingToHaqq 1 year ago
@StickingToHaqq So you actaually ask me to stop thinking?! So you tell me to trust others?! So you tell me that despite the fact that the Quran says to think, that I should stop doing so? So you tell me: whatever you say, stop reflecting and believe other ones interpretations? So you say that others simply have the authority to tell me what to do, not based on evidence but simply because you as a sheep accept that they knpw? Not sure that's written in the Quran is it? No, I never will, I think!
dakodar 1 year ago
@dakodar Do not put words in my mouth please. This noble religion is Islaam. And in it is pure and clear guidance. We don't base our belief on anything EXCEPT that which was revealed unto us from the Lord of the universe.
No one has told you to be a "sheep". But in Islaam, the guidance is clear, and you follow that guidance. Questioning everything will lead you to confusion and thereafter to deviation from the truth.
StickingToHaqq 1 year ago
@StickingToHaqq In other words, you can claim whatever you want, but there is no reason to believe that you know better than the many scholars who studied the book most likely more than you do (being professional scholars). So, though it's good for you that you find peace in your version, there is no good argument for others to accept you (and those you follow) are correct. It could be so that only 1 sect will flourish, yet nothing hints to the fact which is actually correct. Good luck!
dakodar 1 year ago
@dakodar Who said that I know better than scholars? Once again, don't put words into my mouth please.
It seems as if you are not searching for the truth, and I am not here to debate with you but rather to clarify that which you are asking about. May Allah guide you.
StickingToHaqq 1 year ago
@StickingToHaqq If all was so clear and very obvious, then how come there are so many different opinions on wearing a hijab, niqab, veil or nothing? If it all is so very authentic, then how come a lot of Muslims will disagree with you on so many levels? Because the Quran requires interpretation and you might disagree about these. In other words, 'authentic' is something you define as X and someone else as Y. So your opinion is absolutely perfect then, and thus authentic? Never stop thinking!
dakodar 1 year ago
@dakodar That is because many of the Muslims have deviated from the true, correct and authentic teachings of Islam.
Questions about hijaab, etc are from Islaamic jurisprudence (Fiqh). You can find some small differings among the scholars therein.
However, our belief (´Aqeedah) doesn't contain differing, and all of those from the earliest generations were upon ONE belief.
The Prophet ´alayhis-salaam informed that the Muslims would divide into 73 sects, all of them deviated except for one.
StickingToHaqq 1 year ago
@StickingToHaqq 1. "because many of the Muslims have deviated from the true": I guess you then have 'the' true version. All should come to talk to you then.
2. "guidance is clear": well, not true as seen in the various interpretations. But then again, you disregard that argument cause you, as true follower, know the truth about Islam
3. "will lead you to confusion": so here you indeed state that questioning and thinking (mentioned in the Quran btw) is not good. So you follow...
dakodar 1 year ago
If you have learnt about the deviated sects that exist in Islaam, then you will know that they deviated only after having philosophised about various verses. For example, they used their intellects to understand the Attributes and Names of Allah, which led to them becoming confused and thus DENYING them. Here you have a clear example of people going astray because of philosophy.
StickingToHaqq 1 year ago
@StickingToHaqq "a clear example of people going astray because of philosophy": So how do you go about 'finding the truth' then? You simply read, listen to none and make up your own version? Or do you talk about it with others? Surprise: talking to others about religion and the interpretation of those words is philosophizing. Philosophy does not only happen in a library or school. Forgot about people telling you the meaning of words? What they mean, how you should understand them...
dakodar 1 year ago
@dakodar When you want to understand a verse, you refer back to the Book of Allah, the Sunnah of the Prophet ´alayhis-salaam and the Righteous Predecessors (as-Salaf as-Saalih). Then you will gain a correct understanding of this religion. For verily the correct understanding is found therein.
So, NO PHILOSOPHY.
StickingToHaqq 1 year ago
@StickingToHaqq I don't think you actually understand what I refer to. I refer to real-live situations who demand an interpretation. Surely, not 'every' situation is described, not 'all' situations are descrined. Hence, you require 'thinking' (call it philosophy if you want) to apply the rules. Hence, you divert and might make mistakes. The claim that you NEVER make mistakes, cause your understanding is perfect is simplistic and dangerous (cause arrogant and dominant).
dakodar 1 year ago
@dakodar Now I see. You only debate for the sake of debates. Bye.
StickingToHaqq 1 year ago
@StickingToHaqq No, I debate since I disagree with you, and I use arguments to show you. It's as with all 'believers' who are so convinced they're right: as soon as they find out they have no arguments, they simply claim "Poeha, I'm right anyway, whatever you say". It's good for you that you have guidance, your choice. But if I'm told to stop thinking, I think back of history and see the many consequences when people followed leaders 'who knew best'.
dakodar 1 year ago
@dakodar Ahl-us-Sunnah wal Jama´ah have the true version of Islaam. They follow the guidance from their Lord, the Book of Allah and the Sunnah of the Prophet (salla Allahu ´alayhi wa sallam), as understood by the three first generations - as-Salaf as-Saalih. This is the guidance, and it is clear for you to follow it.
StickingToHaqq 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@StickingToHaqq "Ahl-us-Sunnah wal Jama´ah have the true version of Islaam": there we have it! Finally you simply provide no arguments whatsoever and are only about defending your views. Good for you to find peace, but it's a false believe that you are sure. You, as a person, rely fully on those who represent your sect. You even confess not to think about it too much, cause it might compromise your thoughts. I always am wary about such simple acceptance and even more if they try to enforce it.
dakodar 1 year ago
@dakodar I provided arguments if you would only read them. I mentioned to you TWO AHADEETH from the Messenger of Allah salla Allahu ´alayhi wa sallam wherein he explained that there will be a group steadfast upon the truth - AL- JAMA´AH.
I rely FULLY on the Noble Prophet and the Slave of Allah, Muhammad ibn ´Abdillaah (salla Allahu ´alayhi wa sallam). And I base my belief completely upon that which was revealed unto him (´alayhis-salaam).
StickingToHaqq 1 year ago
@StickingToHaqq "I provided arguments": no you did not. The only argument I read is that there will be sects who will be wrong. You did, and can't, provide arguments that you are part of the sect that is right. Simply stating that 'there is one true sect' does not mean that you're in that sect. I can only hope you will not aggressively impose it to others. It's scary to hear people say that thinking is wrong. Human kind heart that too much, mostly with very bad consequences.
dakodar 1 year ago
@dakodar IN ANOTHER NARRATION of the hadeeth that I mentioned earlier, when the Companions asked the Prophet ´alayhis-salaam which sect this true sect is then he answered: "Those who are upon that which I and my Companions are upon today".
This is a clear, extremely clear indication that the only true guidance is by following the Prophet and his Companions who understood the religion better than any others after them.
There you go. And that is all I have to say. The guidance is clear.
StickingToHaqq 1 year ago
@StickingToHaqq "Those who are upon that which I and my Companions are upon today": see again, no argument. You simply say: we should follow this. But you have not yet provided any argument to show that ALL your interpretations are right. Btw, every sect makes that claim, every Muslim believes he's on the right path, every scholar tries to comply. So ALL are wrong, and you're so very right just because you tell me you are? Would you believe me if I tell you: accept that I'm a pink unicorn! No..
dakodar 1 year ago
@dakodar The Prophet (salallaahu 'alaihi wa sallam) said: "A group of my Ummah (nation) shall remain steadfast, on the truth, victorious, unharmed by those who oppose them, and do not support them, until the death or until the Day of Resurrection."
StickingToHaqq 1 year ago
The Prophet ´alayhis-salaatu was-salaam said: "My Ummah will split up into seventy-three sects, all of them will be in the Fire except one sect." They asked: "Which one, O Messenger of Allah? He replied: "Al-Jama`ah (the true followers of the Prophet)."
StickingToHaqq 1 year ago
And if you read the athar of the Salaf, the further down our Salaf went down the generations when innovations started occurring, they actually started distuingishing themselves from the innovators by labelling them as ahl-ul-Bid'ah and mubtadi'ah.
What the Salafiyyun are doing today is the exact same thing.
StickingToHaqq 2 years ago
O you who have believed, fear Allaah as He should be feared and do not die except as Muslims. And hold firmly to the rope of Allaah all together and do not become divided. And remember the favor of Allaah upon you when you were enemies and He brought your hearts together and you became, by His favor, brothers. And you were on the edge of a pit of the Fire, and He saved you from it. Thus does Allaah make clear to you His verses that you may be guided. [aali 'Imraan 3:102-103]
ai4170 2 years ago
Firstly, Allaah taala has clearly prohibited the Muslims from breaking into differing sects intentionally, each rejoicing on that which they are upon. So this action of theres is in fact sinful and not praiseworthy.Secondly, if calling yourself salafi was to be derived from this hadith, Fatima [ra] would have been the first one to use it. Since Rasoolullaah sallaahu alayhi wa salam was directing this towards her.
ai4170 2 years ago
None of the generations that Rasoolullaah sallaahu alayhi wa salam praised, referred to themselves as salafis saying they follow the salaf. They all called themselves Muslims, in accordance with the Sunnah. So this claim is void of any substance.The use of statements of some la as ibn Taymiyyah and adh-Dhahabi. This does not require any criticism as sayings of scholars is not evidence and their opinions are not binding upon the Ummah.
ai4170 2 years ago
And your statement that since times have changed and many sects have emerged. It is obligatory to identify and separate ourselves from these deviant sects (deviant in their eyes), is in fact an innovated belief and method. There existed sects amongst the previous nations, such as amongst the followers of Eesa ibn Mariam [as], and also during the time of the Sahaabah [ra]. Yet, they still referred themselves as Muslims; since this is what Allah taala had named us.
ai4170 2 years ago
In surah aali Imraan ayah 52:
But when Jesus felt disbelief from them, he said, Who are my supporters for Allaah? The disciples said, We are supporters for Allaah. We have believed in Allaah and testify that we are Muslims.
And in ayah 78 of aali Imraan:
It is He Who has named you Muslims both before and in this
ai4170 2 years ago
And the hadith reported by Abu Dawud from Furat ibn Hayyan [ra]Rasoolullaah sallaahu alayhi wa salam commanded to kill him: he was a spy of Abu Sufyan and an ally of a man of the Ansar. He passed a circle of the Ansar and said: I am a Muslim. A man from the Ansar said, Rasoolullaah, he is saying that he is a Muslim. Rasoolullaah sallaahu alayhi wa salam said: There are people among you in whose faith we trust. Furat ibn Hayyan is one of them.
ai4170 2 years ago
From this I can conclude, calling towards this label of salafiya is indeed against the Sunnah and it is a call of jaahiliya which holds no benefit. And calling oneself Muslim is the right way and in accordance to the Sunnah.
ai4170 2 years ago
The Muslims should definitely not be divided. Rather they must divide upon the truth and the one and only correct aqeedah, which is the aqeedah and the way of our Salaf-us-Salih.
However, the Prophet 'alayhis-salam said that the Ummah would split into 73 sects, all of them going to the Fire except for one. Thus, if you want to remain upon the truth, then stick to the correct way - the way of ahl-us-Sunnah wal jama'ah.
StickingToHaqq 2 years ago
Yes. You said you follow the way of salaf-us-salah. Did the salaf-us-salih call themselves salaf. Did Abu Baker, Omar, Othman, Ali, riduallah anhum call themselves salafies? surely not. They call themselves Muslims period. In ayah 78 of aali Imraan:
It is He Who has named you Muslims both before and in this
ai4170 2 years ago
They didn't HAVE TO call themselves anything other than Muslims, because back then the Companions were upon ONE AQEEDAH.
Today there is bid'ah and deviation everywhere! You have the tablighiyyun, the sufiyyun, the raafidhah, the khawaarij - you have loads of sects that have gone astray from the true aqeedah that the Companions were upon.
Do you now understand why we must adhere to our Salaf?
Ibn Taymiyyah rahimahullah surely is evidence, I think you misinterpreted his saying.
StickingToHaqq 2 years ago
And this is the way of the Companions (radhiya Allahu anhum) and the methodology that they learnt from our Noble Prophet (salla Allahu 'alayhi wa sallam).
Separating truth from falsehood is the reason why Books and Messengers were revealed; separate the truth from falsehood, tawheed from shirk, etc. So whosoever turns away from ahl-us-Sunnah wal Hadeeth, and as-Salafiyyah, then that individual has left the truth and the blame is upon him for dividing himself from the Jama'ah.
StickingToHaqq 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
And your statement that since times have changed and many sects have emerged. It is obligatory to identify and separate ourselves from these deviant sects, is in fact an innovated belief and method. There existed sects (Kharajities, Sabaeen, etc.) during the time of the Sahaabah [ra]. Yet, they still referred themselves as Muslims; since this is what Allah taala had named us.
ai4170 2 years ago
lbn Taymiyyah (d.728H) - rahimahullaah - said: "There is no criticism for the one who proclaims the way (madhdhab) of the Salaf, who attaches himself to it and refers to it. Rather, it is obligatory to accept that from him by unanimous agreement (Ittifaaq) because the way (madhdhab) of the Salaf is nothing but the Truth (Haqq)." [Majmoo al-Fataawaa 4:149]
StickingToHaqq 2 years ago
These statements by ibn Taymiyyah rahimahullah is not evidence and his opinions are not binding upon the Ummah. Also to note, nowhere does ibn Taymiyyah state that calling yourself salafi is permissible. He is just saying (its very obvious what he is saying) That there is no criticism who proclaim the way of salaf (Forerunners or precedents sahaba RA), attaches to it, or refers to it. He doesnt say its permissible to call onself salafi. it so clear subhanallah.
ai4170 2 years ago
I'm glad they are pre-occupying themselves with such nonsense. This would give all the rest of us to excel in life and nail them if they deviate from the civil discourse of society.
zoorezou 2 years ago
The correct way to understand islam is to wear turban, strap bombs on your chest, carry ak47, beating and stoning women.
TomVu99 2 years ago
assalamu'alaikum yaa akhi....keep strong in the way who our prophet Muhammad shalallohu alaihi wassalam and sahabah radiyallohhum ajma'in and all imams ahlussunah..my best love from your ikhwah(brother) in indonesia,may have your email or website to cantact you all?thanks wassalam
soniederris 2 years ago
That Bint Robert looks like a puppet bobbing up and down like summat not right, coz tho she's talking we can't see her mouth move and it just looks like she's weird. Well, to dress like that she IS weird.
puffinstuffsmum 2 years ago
watermellen
MegaPrincess1998 2 years ago
They have no prayer space for women in the mosque in the video...booo! This would never happen at the mosques where I live in Canada
aliradulescu 2 years ago
GO HOME
mcmolotow 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Islam teaches MURDER, to KILL for Allah in order to enter the Islamic paradise!!.
sura 9 : 111 Allah hath purchased of the Believers their persons and their goods; for theirs (in return) is the Garden (of Paradise): they FIGHT in HIS CAUSE(they kill for Allah), and KILL and they are KILLED
westernvaluesdefense 2 years ago
FLOGGINGS 24:02, .
quran, Sura[24:02]The woman and the man guilty of adultery or fornication, - flog each of them with a hundred stripes: Let not compassion move you in their case, in a matter prescribed by Allah, if ye believe in Allah and the Last Day:and let a party of the Believers witness their punishment
CUTTING HANDS AND FEET sura 5:33 AND 5:38 ALL GREAT IN ISLAM!
westernvaluesdefense 2 years ago
NOW YOUR TALKIN. HEY, PAL THIS IS WHAT YOU LEFT OUT!!!
READ SURAH 24:1-5!!
...repent thereafter and mend (their conduct) Allah is Oft-Forgiving, Most Merciful.
(SURAH 24: 5)
Except for those who repent before they fall into your power: in that case, know that Allah is Oft-forgiving, Most Merciful (SURAH 5: 33)
39. But if the thief repents after his crime, and amends his conduct, Allah turneth to him in forgiveness; for Allah is Oft-forgiving, Most Merciful
(SURAH 5:39)
moorejr1400 2 years ago
This also appears in the bible, read:
MARK CHAPTER 9:43-50 christians have it too but many are ashamed to accept it so they attack islam.
moorejr1400 2 years ago
Muslims follow a sick cult leader Muhammad who gauged eyes out, and cut hands and feet. Muslims think that barbarism and violence is ok!
SAHIH BUKARI VOLUME 8, BOOK 82, HADITH .795:
The Prophet sent (some people) in their pursuit and so
they were (caught and) brought, and the Prophets ordered that
their hands and legs should be cut off and that their eyes
should be branded with heated pieces of iron, and that their
cut hands and legs should not be cauterized, till they die.
westernvaluesdefense 2 years ago
read the full story before just taking out one part or construe everything. Show me you really know islam, not just a bunch of half narrations, and poor cause an effect relationships.
moorejr1400 2 years ago
HERES THE REST OF IT!!
Some people from the tribe of 'Ukl came to the Prophet and embraced Islam. The climate of Medina did not suit them, so the Prophet ordered them to go to the (herd of milch) camels of charity and to drink, their milk and urine (as a medicine). They did so, and after they had recovered from their ailment (became healthy) they turned renegades (reverted from Islam) and killed the shepherd of the camels and took the camels away..
SAHIH BUKARI VOLUME 8, BOOK 82, HADITH .795
moorejr1400 2 years ago
i assure you if it had been buddhists that committed 9/11 and 7/7, it would not have been muslims that felt they were being profiled in the aftermath. muslims committed these acts of terrorism and it's quite right that they should be profiled today.
MorningofMourning 2 years ago
You dont really know who did it, that is what cnn/fox told you! You were not the planes you dont even know bin laden, ALL YOU GOT IS WHAT MEDIA TOLD YOU. YOU ARE TOTALLY AT THEIR MERCY. I WATCHED LOOSE CHANGE. you cant be sure, and dont forget history repeats itself. the Japanese also were profiled during world war and they got reperations! apperently they didnt like being profiled either!
moorejr1400 2 years ago
uh yea, and the media also tells me that israel is treating palestinians like shit... should i not believe that either? or should i just believe pro-muslim news reports? they have these guys on video tape... bank transactions and oral accounts of the passengers from flight 93. same thing with the london and madrid bombers. they were muslims... and they embodied the doctrine of islam. destroy all that is not muslim. islam is a religion of murder and hatred.
MorningofMourning 2 years ago
What i read acutally came from SECULAR NON MUSLIM GRASS ROOTS MEDIA, LIKE DEMOCRACY NOW, VILLIAGE VOICE, LOOSE CHANGE, etc. dont think cnn/fox gives a rats behind about you, its really corporate run media, i know people personally who worked in the media industry, journalism as we know it is being threatened by these corporations becuase we are not being heard, you are being told, if you disagree with me google the lyrics of FRANK ZAPPA'S "i'm the slime" this is the truth.
moorejr1400 2 years ago
Morningof Morning. You are right. I say Islam is evil and it's about time the non muslims to wake and fight back, time is NOW, google islam-watch
simba1936 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
The Quran does not teach peace:
9:123"O ye who believe! Fight those of the disbelievers who are near to you, and let them find harshness in you,"
5:58-"And (as for) the man who steals and the woman who steals, cut off their hands as a punishment for what they
have earned, an exemplary punishment from Allah";
8:12-"I will cast terror into the hearts of those who disbelieve. Therefore strike off their heads and strike off every fingertip of them."
Jesus said to forgive your enemies.
snnicky 2 years ago
Islam is like a public toilet - you can piss in it, you can shit in it, you can wipe your ass in it, you can even have a wank in it - but eventually you have to leave because of the gut wrenching stink of ass and piss.
throbule 2 years ago
u need to fear allah cause his religion is nothing to play with
ameer101 2 years ago
ameer101 - Let me tell you what I fear.
I fear nothing, especially your so called allah and your so called prophet mohammed (piss be upon him).
If you want to listen to this Bajan idiot and his friend in this video. that is up to you, but I have a perfect right to say what I like on youtube same as you.
Next time you see any comment from me, just shut up little man.
Now go and wash your dirty asshole - its time to pray to your dog (sorry god).....LOL
throbule 2 years ago
THAT WAS STUPID.
moorejr1400 2 years ago
moorejr140, To ridicule Islam or any individual Muslim is not stupid. google faithfreedom inthenameofallah
simba1936 2 years ago
Fraithfreedom is an anti islam site, so is islam hope, they are saying fraithfreedom but they twist and take many verses of the quran out of context, leaving large gaps in historical events to make islam look like the current issues, insiuating that al-qaida, taliban, etc are true teachings of islam, hense kill them all! its to preach hate so dont listen to them.
moorejr1400 2 years ago
moorejr1400,If you think they at Faithfreedom are wrong then prove them they are wrong and they promise to shut down the site. Out of 1.5 billion muslims not even one has succeeded , I wonder why? Because Islam lies as do the muslims. People all over the world have now realised how evil Islam is and started to fight back. Buddhists in the South of Thailand have been now armed by the Thai Govt,so they can fight back Muslims there.Islam is EVIL as are the Muslims. You days are numbered.
simba1936 2 years ago
shes attractive isnt she...she really knows how to work that 9 th century satans postbox. outfit..you go girl..work that buka!...does anyone think her bomb looked big in that?
heston99 2 years ago
if you dont have knowlege but prejudice just shouth the *&* up.
moorejr1400 2 years ago
u muslims are the biggest joke and brainwashed DUMBASSES of the earth!
You believe in a pedophile that made up a cult! What a fucking joke you people are. WIFE BEATING MORONS!
westernvaluesdefense 2 years ago 2
YOU SHOULD SAY THAT INTO A MIRROR.
moorejr1400 2 years ago
you are the biggest joke, actually speak to some producers in holly wood, you may just get your own sitcom entitled: "westernvaluesdefense comedy hour" it run 10 seasons!!! who knows?
moorejr1400 2 years ago
Muslims think that barbarism, chopping hands and feet, murder is good!religionofpeace?HAHAHAHAH
Sura (5:33) - "The punishment of those who wage war against Allah and His messenger and strive to make mischief in the land is only this, that they should be MURDERED or CRUCIFIED or their HANDS and their FEET should be CUT OFF on opposite sides or they should be imprisoned; this shall be as a disgrace for them in this world, and in the hereafter they shall have a grievous chastisement"
westernvaluesdefense 2 years ago 2
What kind of people?
who:
wage war against god
god's messenger
cause mischief in the land
etc. So these are good samaritans, right?
also read this:
Except for those who repent before they fall into your power: in that case, know that Allah is Oft-forgiving, Most Merciful.
5: 34, gee, how did you mist that!!!! its right underneath your favorate verse!!
moorejr1400 2 years ago
allah said 'if u hav dispute among each other, refer back to ALLAH and his messenger', not early generation so brother i fink u need to read that ayat again.
Pist0l1 2 years ago 3
maybe you need to read the Quran
"When there comes to them some matter touching (Public) safety or fear, they divulge it. If they had only referred it to the Messenger, or to those charged with authority among them, the proper investigators would have Tested it from them (direct). Were it not for the Grace and Mercy of Allah unto you, all but a few of you would have fallen into the clutches of Satan. "
4.083
BeMyBro 2 years ago
yer and the one who hav authority over the muslim is non but Khalifa not the alim, the profet clearly stated this and said this isue belong to the Quraysh so dont me tell me that i dont know wot im sayin, and wen it comes to hukum shar'i we refer back ALLAH and his messenger
Pist0l1 2 years ago
did i say alim?
Did the video say alim?
no they said the sahaba
thanks for proving the point
BeMyBro 2 years ago
why do i bother with the ignorance wot type of point is that, even if the video said sahaba but the point is that Qur'an never mention to go back to the sahabas
Pist0l1 2 years ago
You just said yourself that the verse meaning was to go to the khalifa
"yer and the one who hav authority over the muslim is non but Khalifa not the alim"
BeMyBro 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
fuck allah
by the way shit tunage 0.54
benjiisgangsta 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
The "prophet" Mohammed was a mass murderer, rapist, pillager, terrorist and pedophile who, in his 50s, had sexual relations with a 9-year-old girl, his thirteenth wife Aiyesha - Aiyesha is quoted in the Hadith, a commentary on the life of Mohammed considered no less sacred than the Koran itself by 1.2 billion Muslims around the world: "Narrated Aiyesha: That the prophet wrote the marriage contract with her when she was six years old, and he consummated his marriage when she was nine years old."
rokyroyal123 2 years ago
pff
its still one and the same god the christians, muslims and jews believe in, but different teaches our so high and mighty priests interpreted.
In any case lots of islams teaches aren't in line with western values, so my personal oppinion is it sucks and i will never live like this.
But as long as you think the same about christians, without blowing them up, nobody cares what you are doing down there in the middle east.
KRYPTONPRIME 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
blow the fucking pussy shaped Hajra-e-Aswad stone in the fucking black stone called Kabba in that fucking Mecca with a Hydrogen Bomb during Hajj to get rid of this fucking evil ideology called islam
Faraz70 2 years ago
GOD IS THE GREATEST
usfr122 3 years ago 2
usfr122, GOD IS THE GREATEST. Yes, but NOTallah,NOTallah,NOT allah .
simba1936 2 years ago
Allah is name for god not only by muslims but arabic speaking jews and christians as well. Please educate yourself on this name.
moorejr1400 2 years ago
The word "Allah" is not only standing for the word "god". Its standing for the Only One God who has NO Partners, no sons, nothing. There is ONLY HIM!
Saharahenna 2 years ago
that is correct, it is THE GOD, forgot the mention the definite article, so Allah fully vocalized is Allahu WHICH IS THE GOD, THE ONLY TRUE GOD, ONLY HIM, AND IT CANNOT BE MADE PLURAL OR FEMININE, NO GENDER, ONE GOD, and no human can possess this name if so abdu has to come before it such as Abdullah, the same goes for the rest of the devine attributes.
moorejr1400 2 years ago
i would like to say , dont judge a religon based on out of hand group . remember . even cristians also have bad groups .. and gangs .
be more educated
be more open minded
usfr122 3 years ago 2
you block people because you can't handle the truth about your satanic beliefs.
pedophilia, honor killing, jihad are disgusting and animalistic
as is inbreeding, polygamy and the high rate if hiv in islamic countries
you lie about everything and can not handle being confronted with the REALITY of your death cult
i wish you would wake up to realty
i bet you will block me
you can NOT handle the truth about sunni islam
americanmuslumcunt 3 years ago 2
you are a real un educated idiot
so . when one of us "american" goes and do some stupid , like the shit you have done and will keep on doing , at that case we are the worst nation ever ... wake up you idiot .. dont judge a nation based on out of hand idiots like you
usfr122 3 years ago
The lady in black mentions that mohammed was a perfect example of who we should follow as muslims. He married a 6 year old girl when he was 54; this is a big crime against chilhood. Please do not follow his example
buffgirl1986 3 years ago
buffgirl1986 You butthead who are u to ask ppl not to follow the prophet? People like u with sh*t in their mind are still bubbling and parroting the same old story that the prophet married a 6y.o girl and that's a crime. You ignorant stupid whore u better count how many bastards u slept with. That's better for u than speaking ill of the honest and the clean..
SalafBrotherhood 3 years ago
..............
SalafBrotherhood 3 years ago
Listen u bitch! First, at that time, it was normal for ppl to marry at that age, so that's a century's specific.
SalafBrotherhood 3 years ago
Second, he married her at 6 and didn't touch her until she was 9 and there are a lot of proofs which say that 9y.o girls at that time were complete women, esp that they were in Sahara where the weather is hot. Even now, in India, a hot country, some girls get married at 8y.o.
SalafBrotherhood 3 years ago
You are pathetic. Each and every muslim man I have spoken to in person is even more ignorant and messed up as you. It is like talking to a brick wall! "9y.o girls at that time were complete women" WHAT? Get some help sir.. A 54 yr old sleeping with a 6 or 9 yr or even 13 year old child is a peadophile. If you had an underaged daughter would you give her to an old man? It does not matter if he is the messenger of god or santa clause. I hope you do not do the same, you will go to hell for it.
buffgirl1986 3 years ago
HHAHAHA buffgirl1986 You are funny but stupid and ignorant. Yes for u i'm pathetic but for me u are very pathetic. Believe me u have no knowledge neither about history nor about human physiology and The female reproductive system. I bet u were the laziest at school. Also ur info about climate effects on humans body is 0%. I'd hope to see ur marks at school. You little monkey!
SalafBrotherhood 3 years ago
I'll show u how much lazy and ignorant u are. But then u should . Look at this wikipedia page. You'll find statistics about the age at which males & females get married around the world at present. Notice that it differs from one place to another bcz many factors control the matter. See that in Russia for example girls can marry at 14 ??? WHAT??? Yes baby they do ..
SalafBrotherhood 3 years ago
So, if Russia is a very cold country and at present girls can get married there at 14 then why can't u accept that girls can get married at 9 more than 14 centuries before and in Sahara which is a very hot place, knowing that genetic and environmental factors affect the pubertal timing greatly???!
SalafBrotherhood 3 years ago
The address is the following:
h t t p : // en. wikipedia. org / wiki / Marriageable _ age
Well omit the spaces .. You know!
SalafBrotherhood 3 years ago
Ok, calm down..Why do u have to type 10 messages when we only need 1 response? Sure a 14 year old girl in Russia or elsewhere can marry. Will she marry a 17 year old boy or will she marry a 54 year old man? If you have a 6 or 9 year old child now/in future, will you give her hand to a 54 year old man? Thats all you have to answer without swearing, thanks.
buffgirl1986 3 years ago
If u want to know the real peadophiles u just close ur eyes and choose any old man in ur country and ask him how many little girls he raped!! If an old man (the prophet) married a 9y.o girl 14 centuries ago where it was normal then he is a peadophile. But if the bastards in ur country rape 9y.o girls everyday then they are free and civilized!!.. Yes, i have to type 10 msgs bcz some ppl don't understand from 1 msg and u need to explain things fully so that they can grasp the meaning at the end
SalafBrotherhood 3 years ago
No, the old man would be found and put into prison as it is not allowed. There are many paedophiles and I am just worried that they would be attracted to islam as they can not only have sex with a child but marry one. Mohammed was a paedophile and you should not follow his example, end of story
buffgirl1986 3 years ago 2
"you should not follow his example, end of story".. HHAHAHA You see! You said before that talking to Muslims "is like talking to a brick wall" .. In fact, it's u who is a brick wall. I noticed this in ur 1st comment and that's why i called u a butthead. Well, civilized whore don't forget what i told u earlier .. Start looking for a dog or a donkey in ur area it would be of much benefit when u are thrown away after being well used!!
SalafBrotherhood 3 years ago
Sure you muslim fanatic go mental and do jihad on youtube! post 1000 responses.. I will type it again.. Mohammed was a Paedophile and no man should follow his example.
buffgirl1986 3 years ago
buffgirl1986 You are a catastrophe! Being weak in giving sound proof plus parroting the others' mickey mouse views, u should go burry yourself before i do jihad on u .. I'm a Muslim and much powerful than u, slapping u on the face with ur language and providing u with scientific info that u ignore .. hehehe.. civilized bitch! .. Plus, while u are the bastards' toilet, following the prophet Mohammed has made me clean and honest.. That's why many ppl in ur area embrace Islam everyday
SalafBrotherhood 3 years ago
more power to you ...... i am on your side .... god is the greatest , mohamad is his messenger
usfr122 3 years ago
and you have brain damage.
embryocargo 2 years ago
you are such an idiot .... i switched to islam .. do you know why ... i was just like you ... i mis judged it . but once i knew that i understod it wrong and few are doing the islam wrong ... now i am in
usfr122 3 years ago
If u check ur previous comments u would know that at the beginning u were against the idea that a 9y.o girl may be a complete woman .. You said: "9y.o girls at that time were complete women" WHAT?" .. Well, as i told u before many girls in India get married at the age of 8 and in some parts of the Rif region they get married at even 6y.o at present believe me. And most often the man's age is btwn 20 and 30 but in few cases he can be 50 and ppl there accept it with no objection
SalafBrotherhood 3 years ago
Also to say that a 54 y.o man sleeping with a 6 or 9 yr or even 13 year old child is a peadophile may be true in the present, but centuries back in history this wasn't a problem at all. Rather, it was something normal either among Muslims or Christians. But now bcz u've become civilized (hehehe) this seems unacceptable to u .. And in none of his teachings he tells women to marry at 9. On the contrary, he taught us not to force women to get married with someone they don't want.
SalafBrotherhood 3 years ago