Mr. Chandler, you don't get the point of terrorism.
Anyone from outside the US laughs about your theory, because terrorism is real and happens in countries all over the world.
ETA, IRA, Al-Quida, RAF etc. You think all these organisations... are govenment 'inventions'? It may be interesting to think that the government intends to kill its own citizens. But don't forget there are always extremist nuts around.
@StopFundingIsrael Whether some other country had a hand in 9/11 I don't know, but they could not possibly have done it without coordinating with US agencies. We need to get our own house in order before pointing fingers elsewhere.
What?! Build a fence to keep American murderers out of foreign counties? How many Americans go into Mexico and Canada and kill their citizens? The problem is Mexican drug cartels are killing OUR citizens. They are also the ones who kill innocent Mexicans in Mexico's border towns, not Americans. I don't see how this has anything to do with the so called war on terror though, as the US has NOT secured its boarders. Proof that they are not worried about Drug Lords OR terrorists crossing over.
@Quintapus You don't know ironical humor when you see it. The only reason drug cartels exist, however, is because we make it profitable through prohibition and the phony drug war. It is high time to take the profit motive out of drugs and treat addiction as a disease.
@strange NIST didnt use the actual numbers. They decreased the steel dimensions, calculated with more kerosin, increased the heat etc. It was a simulation to suit their theory.
@MichaelParentiOrg I don't know why this was flagged as spam. (I unflagged it.) I don't know if MichaelParentiOrg is actually Michael Parenti or not, but the comment is valid.
@DavidSChandler Thank you David much appreciated! This friends channel is indeed created with Dr. Parenti's consent. He can't answer all mail personallly although he tries to do so as much as possible. Sadly Dr. Parenti is familiar with being "censored" as so many others who speak out uncomfortable truths but we are not sure what happened in this case... we did notice Dr. Parenti/his channel is very limited in the number of post allowed recieving YT Spam warnings on regular base.
@DavidSChandler Dr. Parenti has a facebook profile where he answers his fans personally and recently started his own Blog! I'll send you the links in a personal message, you can find many more links on his channel.
Thanks again for your support and sharing your own work!
David, I agree that fearmongering about terrorism hasn't done any good in the USA, and the War on Terror has been conspicuous in its failure. But are you pretending that Al Qaeda and terror networks don't exist? Or just that the 3,000 civilians killed on 9/11 aren't that important in the big picture?
And as far as "conjuring up" a nonexistent enemy, what are you and AE911Truth doing with your pseudoscientific claims about controlled demolition of the WTCs?
@unRompecabezas Al Qaeda exists. It was created by the CIA to fight the soviets in Afghanistan. There is overwhelming evidence that the North and South Towers and WTC7 were brought down with explosives. See 911speakout org
@unRompecabezas 'pseudoscientific ' ? there is nothing theoretical about the well documented anomalies that prove beyond all reasonable doubt that additional energy sources were present in the destruction of wtc 1 2 & 7. For ex: the 100 day fires w/excessive temps (2800f a week later) Molten metal documented in the fema BPAT & small iron spheres in the dust. WTC7 in symmetrical freefall, how explosive 1&2 were the it pulverized all that concrete and over 1000 people remain unaccounted for, etc
@winston2015 "Well-documented anomalies"? You mean to tell me you think there's something suspicious about not being able to locate victims' remains when 100-story buildings collapse and leave a huge pile of rubble that smolders for weeks?
i guess you didnt hear or see about the huge planes crashing into the world trade center. The buildings blow up, and 3000 people dead. Yeah, thats not a threat!
I just cannot believe that anyone can look at the facts of 9/11 and not see that the problems and conflicts with official accounts go waaayyyy beyond anticipated anomalies in any unprecedented event! Molten metal, -'high temp erosion' documented by gov scientists in may 2002 (see FEMA BPAT App C), 99 days fires 'would not go out,' temps to 2800f (see Bechtel readings), pulverized concrete, 1100 missing bodies, dissembled superstructures, WTC7, the micro-spheres (not fly ash!), harrit report etc
As I very much doubt it. the same could be done for WT1+2 but that is a much harder fish to fry. The explosive connections pdfs are getting there though, way over my head mind. But it's coming, all of this revolves around eventually pressing RUN on a computer model and replicating what happened to 1,2 and 7.
It's a brain trick. If the brain recieves one visual stimuli with other crap facts it has to except it, a connection is made.
If you parody, present another visual stimuli that matches real life more than the other, the brain will dismiss the lesser automatically. That's what brains do on a simple level. That's why 9/11 worked so well and that's why it WILL work so well.
The brain cannot handle two versions, it will automatically drop the funky one and then what is it left with?
I've googled it and have found no evidence of anybody trying to prove the demolition via physics models. If there was a new report that is what they would do.
I read the report last night and my computer is not quite up to it. Making tunes yes but not the physics of a 46 story building. Maybe lots of peoples pcs number crunching through the night could do it, i don't know how to do that.
I'm sure it would take a while to match the sequence but once it was done it would work every time
It may be a demonstration of the obvious, but it is not that obvious or we wouldn't be having this conversation. Using the same software to match to the newly released evidence, to figure out the detonation sequence is not obvious. I'm on your side dude but if we want to prove it then PROVE IT. At the moment it is a collection of facts.
A report with a picture of the physics model on the front actually looking like real life is a BIG thing.
@STRANGEtownVIDEO "I'm correct in thinking nobody has thought of it before then?"
I didn't mean to imply that. It's just that most of the modeling I have seen is centered around demonstrations that it couldn't happen the way NIST said it happened. Simply blowing out 8 floors would be more of a demonstration of the obvious, but it might be worth doing anyway.
If for some reason guys can't do it, give me links to the relevant software and building plans and I'll do it because I'm sick and tired of this terror bullshit.
But if you do do it let me know as i have a song brewing in my mind for this too.
My email is strangetowncollectiveATliveDOTcoDOTuk. I'd love to talk less publically so to speak if you would too.
Use their report against them. Copy it but use the truth, the undeniable check it out yourself because WE are NOT HIDING CALCULATIONS and MEASUREMENTS TRUTH.
PROVE IT rather than dis-proving theirs.
Then call them out on it. The visual LOVELYNESS of such a video on youtube, viraled through email will be a beautiful sight. And approachable by anybody watching it. If I'm right,
2011 is gonna be the year we get NIST's BALLS ON A PLATTER.
Supposed "terrorist threats" is constantly pushed on the people through the media. Comedians make jokes about "terrorists", dumbed down FACEBOOK using women talk non-stop about people "looking like terrorists", the news bombards you with "terrorist plots" that no one else but them knows about, and so on and so on..
This just shows how stupid people have become to constantly fall for the same simple-minded ploy. Again and again and again...
Do you know who died from the anthrax letters? The editor and photographer for the publisher of National Enquirer who published the photos of the Bush twins drunk. Remember that photo of them falling down drunk? So what does that tell you. The guy who did it at Ft. Detrick was jewish. WhatReallyHappenedDOTCom has the whole story. I believe his name was Dr. Zack. Remember the phony letters said ""Death to Israel" on them? Total arab set up. Just like 9-11. Google the "Dr. Alan Sabrosky interview"
Terrorism is a psychological device used to stampede people into war or whatever else is wanted. Meaning, if you want to attack country "X" or group "Y" you create a group that is associated or similar to that group and you attack *yourself,* giving you plausible claimability to say said group "fucked with us" and justification for a "defensive" retaliation.
This is what Ed Landsdale did in the Philipines to get Magsaysay elected. Its the most obvious thing in the world.
After viewing a few of your videos I'm left wondering if you actually hold a degree in Physics? Just to be clear, I know you teach physics I'm asking if you hold a degree in physics. Thanks :)
Very heavy ... you see, when "joe nobody" dies because of a drive-by or dies of cancer because he has smoked for 40 years.... that doesn't cost AMERICA (that is daddy big bux) a lot of money, HOWEVER an event like 9/11/2001 that completely destroys the WTC and seriously damages many other buildings, that cost big bux! So it is the reason why we have a "war on terror" ....
HEAVY!
& just like the War on Poverty or War on Drugs, ... its bogus!
alienentity1: Yes, the terrorist threat is used to take away our liberties. It is also used to make war in lots of places. Government and media manipulate public opinion so "we the people" beg them to do these things. Professional demolition brought down the 3 buildings on 9/11. Was it US insiders, Terrorists, or Other?
ShaeFan: David is suggesting that we shouldn't live by fear of what MIGHT happen. You agree with David when you state "assess risks based on evidence". Yet, you insinuate that nuclear threat is more imminent than terrorist threat.
The point is that the terrorism threat is non existent. It is solely based in government and media newsspeak and doubletalk. The nuclear and terrorism and lightening threats can only exist if we believe and act on any newsspeak and doubletalk about them.
I totally agree that the terrorism threat is greatly exaggerated, and is used as an excuse to cut down civil liberties and also to invade other countries.
But 9/11 Truthers destroy their own credibility by focusing on outlandish conspiracy theories that have no relevance to the truth of terrorism.
Every time a truther claims the WTC towers were demolished by the government, they deflect away from serious criticism of the government.
This is your best argument, David. The CD stuff is ridiculous
Everyone should ask themselves Cui Bono - who benefits?
The war on Tobacco would not justify a police state. The war on terror puts the American people in a state of fear that allows the state to bamboozle us into giving up our Liberty at an unprecedented rate.
"He that would make his own Liberty secure, must guard even his enemy from oppression. For if he violates this duty, he establishes a precedent that will surely reach to himself." - Thomas Paine
I fear David SChandler's life is going to be shorter than he realizes... Anyone who brings light to this issue will have to deal with heart conditions, brain tumors, pancreatic cancer or worse... be subject to character assassination.
Surprised you still have this up after the attempted act of terrorism aboard flight 253. Could you please address the following questions?
Do you believe that... a. The US Government had anything to do with flight 253 and b. that terrorism is not a significant cause for concern. It seems both of your exceedingly weak arguments are falling apart in one fell swoop.
Has it ever crossed your mind why Al Qaeda only uses operatives who are half-baked, and who know very little about blowing up aircraft?
Operatives who are spectacularly ineffective after one almost perfect attack in Hollywood blockbuster-style gave Bush an open cheque for war from both a nation and a world, who had put their critical thinking faculties on hold?
All your liberties have vanished, barring those that keep you a consumer-slave.
Yes, it is all a scam. Don't waste time worrying about it though, the new world order will not succeed. As a matter of fact it will fail and fall so fast so hard that it will never again rise its ugly head ever again for eternity.
David, the weakness in your primary argument in this video is that concern for an existential threat cannot be based solely on numbers of past deaths. Rather it is based on the number of potential deaths if an event occurs.
Using your standard of past deaths, one could conclude that nuclear weapons are not a threat because no American has yet died from one. Yet such weapons are an appropriate concern, or should be.
I'm suggesting you are correct that foreign terrorism is less a threat than we are told, but not because there have been relatively few American deaths. Instead its because the government lies to us. False flag operations have destroyed Americans' trust in anything the government says about terrorism.
We therefore face two threats as sitting ducks: real jihad and false flag attacks orchestrated by government.
Thanks for your important analysis of the WTC1 corner column destruction.
@ShaeFan Nuclear weapons aren't a threat. The only country ever to use them in war has been the USA, because we're the only ones with the audacity and lack of conscience to blow up tens of thousands of people in two different residential/agricultural areas that were not militarily involved. Not only killing people, but leaving radiation to poison their progeny and people for ages to come. I'm not afraid of Nukes. Nuclear power is all over the place...should we be worried about that too?
As an aside did you state that the anthrax situation was not investigated? Despite the fact that you clearly have not researched the anthrax incident you still manage to speculate about the perpetrator and possible ties to the government...amazing. I guess I shouldn't be surprised this is the type of speculative, knee jerk, irresponsible statement that dominates the truth movement.
Physman2011 you are either really retarded or have you're head up in your deep ass. It appears that you've missed seeing how the 3 NYC buildings came down deliberately by demolition all the same exact way in its foot print. Not to mention, one of them wasn't hit by a plain. Thermite and related chemicals have been found all over NYC from the dust, that it self is enough proof to prosecute these 9/11 Central Banking Enron lying piss of shit people. Now stop lying and start uniting with the truth.
When you call someone retarded you should make sure you don't make blatant errors in your post (i.e. plain instead of plane). Seems like you're just repeating the truther propaganda 1. Buildings fell into their own footprint (yes gravity pulls straight down) 2. Thermite and related chemicals (just because particular elements were, possibly, found in the dust does not mean that thermite was used. That's why the only chemist to make that claim published in an open source journal).
And it's "piece of shit" not "piss of shit" at least get your insults right. Do you live in the United States...your profile states you do but I find that hard to believe.
The only way I can describe you! Ignorant idiot, even numbers which prove a point dont get through your stupid head. If youre an American I am ashamed to be categorized as an American next to morons like you. Either you are really stupid or you work for these scrums
Well you've resorted to name calling...not too surprising really. Anyway I don't have any more time to waste on you. Are there any truthers out there who will engage in civil, intelligent debate?
Have you done any research? The 1993 WTC bombing, the US embassy bombings in Tanzania and Kenya, the USS Cole bombing not to mention those attacks that have been foiled (e.g. 2000 plot to bomb LAX). Stating that terrorism is not a threat based solely on the statistics is disingenuous and specious at best. As you mention in your video the purpose of terrorism is to instill a sense of terror.....which the statistics you cite do not measure.
You're both cherry picking and avoiding what i showed you.
Regardless of anything else. Again 6 of the 10 member of the 9/11 commission said the investigation was botched and a criminal investigation should be done.
This was in the Washington Post. Regardless of everything else. That alone should make you question everything.
I've said my peace, be safe.
P.S. cross your finger and hope 10/15 doesn't happen either.
Shows that the tower was falling at FREEFALL speeds. This means that the building below the impact site was providing NO resistance. The huge solid core basically disappeared. The anti-topple theory is one explanation which fits the data and the video evidence. Of course any such demolition system would be a matter of national security and secret. This type of system would be a logical followup to the attack that happened in 1993.
There is the anti-topple theory that goes like this:
You rig these buildings so they can be destroyed in the event that they are about to topple. They waited until the last possible moment to push the button and probably started the sequence immediateley after the buildings started to fail at the impact points. Thus we see what we saw in the videos. Instead of toppling over at the weak impact points the buildings were vaporized from the top down. This was done as a safety measure.
agile, thats weak and premeditated. JLaw, There are many difficult points in any adequate description. "Official"/you or "inside job"/US.... Sound cancellation technology can offset sounds. the WTC can "consume" noise. There are videos with a series of few distinct explosion sounds occurring. It goes down sequentially 8-10 floors per/sec. I posted my '59 Vette: 12.8sec@112mph. The WTC arguably was quicker. Just seems odd. All of it. Why not 40 floors and a big 60 story mess? all of it.
What you need to do is pay close attention to the modern developments in demolition technology. The once thought "impossible" (by you OCT'ers) top-down demolition has been done a handful of times now. There is even demolition software out there that can accurately predict the exact way a building will collapse once rigged. All the concrete pulverization, etc is simulated. Pay attention to these developments and you will know (sooner or later) what they used.
You know...I would definitely like to know where people get the loony idea that buildings are designed to collapse a certain way. I really would. WHO THE H DESIGNS A BUILDNIG WITH COLLAPSE IN MIND? YOU DESIGN A BUILDING THATS AS STRUCTURALLY STABLE (AND ECONOMICAL) AS POSSILBLE. You don't say "oh lets remove some I-beams here and there so, if the bldg collapses, it has a smoother ride down.
You don't build two 500,000 ton structures in fear of collapse. You build it to support itself.
Mr Chandler a thinking person such as yourself can easily see the real truth of 911 , However many other thinking people who are locked into there POSITIONS and POWER are afraid to question the gov's offical STORY ....Those of us who fear not will stand with you and TRUMPET the truth as loud as we can. Thank you sir for your courage. The best to you .............Chris
The murders did not bring down the buildings like they should have is your argument if murders bought down the buildings they would have cared more about reducing property damage. That can only makes sense to a 9/11 Commission/NIST conspiracy theorist.
The video and audio tracks have been proven to have been tampered with. That is why many of them do have any audio in them to cover up the sound of all the explosions that all kinds of eyewitness talk about.
I showed the evidence that at least one person in the government was involved in 911 at the very least as an accessory to first degree murder and the evidence that people should have been subpoenaed by the 9/11 Commission conspiracy theorist but were not by the statement made by Patty Casazza which has been out there for a long time. There is no late breaking news in any of that or that there are many crimes the US government has committed against humanity and have never been investigated.
911 was used to start 2 wars and kill hundreds of thousands of people and anybody who does not know that war is the most profitable thing a central bank and the military industrial complex can undertake is completely brainwashed out of reality completely and is not worth wasting any time with and then to suggest beyond that, that Alex Jones and Steven Jones are saying these things to make money after all that is just completely insane.
Energy must not only be added but the release of that energy must be timed and targeted correctly to achieve the results we saw. Compare ground zero at Hiroshima and Nagasaki to WTC.
The floors above the impact zone disintegrate and explode off to the side of the building not that any of that would matter but that is what in fact happens.
Task #1: The energy in gravity cannot cause the near free fall speeds.
Task #2: The energy in gravity cannot cause a symmetrical failure.
Task #3: The energy in gravity cannot cause the pulverization.
There is just way too much resistance in WTC 1, 2 and 7 for gravity to complete the work necessary for just one of those tasks in each building to the bottom let alone to complete all 3 tasks simultaneously in each building. Energy cannot be used twice at the same time.
What has to happen to get that fast of a global collapse is thousands of joints across the full area have to simultaneously break the resistance below the falling debris above it before it collides with the resistance below it otherwise the collapse will at the very least be slowed down by that resistance below the near free falling speeds of debris above it.
Look at the debris photos. WTC 1, 2, and 7 disintegrated and were global collapses completely leveled in rubble. Buildings just do not come down like that by chance or luck if they could there would be no need for controlled demolition companies. Gravity just does not contain anywhere near enough energy to produce what we saw. No science was ever needed to prove that, their conspiracy theory is that ridiculous. It does not matter what they say is going on in the buildings. Gravity cannot do that
You cannot get anywhere near free fall speed without removing all the resistance below that which is falling from above before it collides with the resistance below not to mention a global collapse and the complete pulverization we saw.
WTC 1 and 2 were designed to withstand 10 times the load from what is above it so as you proceed down the building the amount of resistance increases. WTC 1 and 2 debris explodes off to the side as both buildings disintegrate into dust clear down to the bottom while facing increasing resistance to stop the collapse from below. Gravity does not contain any where near enough energy to do that, it is not even anywhere near close.
Yeah - terrorism is a scam - 300,000 Darfuris have not really been murdered, 100,000 Algerian civilians were not really butchered by Islamists, the Taliban do not really murder civilians in Swat, fundamentalists do not really destroy girl's schools or throw acid in their faces..... Beslan, Bali, Mumbai, Madrid and London never happened.....
Good point about anthrax: once the case against Steven Hatfill collapsed, the government lost interest.
The anthrax letters pointed to Hatfill because the return address of one included "The Greendale School". Greendale was a suburb of Salisbury, Rhodesia (now Harare, Zimbabwe) where Hatfill worked. Hatfill lied about his accomplishments on his resume. He made a good villain for the story. Find the people who framed Steven Hatfill and you have your terrorists. The government is not interested.
That being said. The govt would use these statistics to say that all the laws, security measures etc they have have employed since 2001 have prevented further attacks on U.S soil.
This is one way they might try to squeeze out of it.
I still believe there are plenty of things about 911 and this so called was on terror that don't add up. Lets keep questioning!
I was the first to post on this video, the only video DSC allows posting on. I said then "Your work is going to be important to the future..." that comment still here on page one and is still true. the WTC's were loaded with very sophisticated explosives. The sequential 8-12 floors per second is unrefutable.
Thank you. Good to see at least 1 fellow American looks at the information and THINKS about what it means. Indeed, I always wondered why do we Americans lose freedoms and rights when we were not the culprits. Bleah.
The war on "terrorism" is nothing but tilting at windmills. The mere "terrorist" concept is nothing more than an illusion, created by the US government in order to mentaly manipulate the population to go into war at these fabled enemies. It is not the first time this method is utilized by the leaders of a nations (e.g Adolf Hitler.) Very much like the US government (when they destroyed the world trade center and blamed "terrorists") Hitler burned down the Reichtag and blamed communists.
The anthrax thing was wrapped up by blaming it on a guy "Who just by shear luck (LOL)" happened to kill himself just before they charged him with it.
Of course they found the guy years later just when he doesn't want to live anymore. I love how people buy these stories so quickly.
Wake up people, because any one of us might be unlucky enough to be on the wrong plane or open the wrong envelope with Anthrax or be in the wrong city when a baby nuke goes off.
Holy Moly, you have a disconcertingly fertile manner of unleashing idea viruses sir!
Where the hail have you been? I've scoured video land seeking your simple, comprehensive explanations of our reality - especially since the 9 11 show came on the air.
Marshall McLuhan was right. This medium packs a heck of a message and I thank you for yours, Mr. Chandler. Excellent video.
this has been my thought for a while! terror is a state of mind! i like to say a way of thinking! this is how we are controled.not with guns,by thought process!!
Hey David, I appreciate your views. The statistics helped me put things in perspective. I'd love to hear what you have to say about the military industrial complex, and it's role in 911 and the war on terror.
You could make a drinking game out of every time bush says terrah on his recent speech. It's a propaganda buzz word. People don't understand that it's such a huge world, everything under the sun happens, and they can mold public opinion merely by the direction of their cameras.
bush didnt even plant WMD in Iraq to cover his ass. I would have. seriously, If i had just masterminded some huge conspiracy to knock down the towers with hijackings so I could have a reason to do whatever in the world, I would have made sure we planted weapons on Iraq to keep credibility. thats CIA 101. bush didnt. because there was no conspiracy.
still, planting evidence is so common and easy even a small amount of anything should have been possible. The police do it all the time. the sheer volume of false allegations against Iraqi govt and Afgh' should have produced a UN outcry. not a peep, realy (dixie chicks?). so, thats also odd.
so your suggesting Bush would have been too afraid to plant WMD in Iraq due to scrutiny, yet he would risk sending demolition teams and brainwashing multiple people into hi-jacking planes to knock down buildings and pentagon in his own country? do you guys ever think about what you believe?
Do you believe everything your told? Sure, things the hardcore conspiracy theorist say may be wrong - but the official conclusions seem a bit off. Do you not see that?
Im not asking you to change what you think - so there is no need to get so defensive..
what are you telling me?...you are half for the conspiracy and half not? actually I do meet you half way.I believe our leaders were guilty of complacency. I believe its possible they got info this could happen and due to the audacity of the info they figured it wouldnt happen. that doesnt equal war criminal. it pretty much means they dropped the ball.but secret demolition teams?brainwashed pilots? not going to buy it ever.
If i say i'm a conspiracy theorist does that mean i naturally agree with all what is mentioned? No. I do believe elements, but i also think some of it is rubbish also. I never said "bush was to blame". Im not that stupid. I feel something went on, too many official "facts" dont add up and needs re-evaluation. Too many influential people have questioned the offical report. Im no idiot who take loose change as definitive proof. I dont have a theory, im not in a position to comment. (cont..)
(..cont) It worries me that so many RELEVANT people discard the report. You seem bright, and not some gun ho youtube armchair know it all, so i'd hope to think you see why i think what i do.
look, dont be vague.there are only 3 options. they themselves planned it(ie inside job)....they didnt plan it...or they were lax with our security out of complacency.
the facts add up more on the side of complacency then any idioctic idea they sent secret demolition tams and brainwashed pilots and hired mostly saudi pilots when they were trying to blame Iraq. cripes theres another headscratcher that dooms this conspiracy idea!
Jlaw, its not hard to find falling blds. "Koyaniskwatsi", FF Coppola c. 1980 has a series of imploded blds (and Chemtrails, but i digress). All you have to do is remove the lower material out of the way from the whats above in a timely manner. It doesnt matter where you start. I recorded 911 out of Fresno Ca area and on one piece you do hear explosions. there is no shortage of witness' reporting multiple explosions. I have a "collapse" play list showing xlt close up of sequential explosions.
Actually the wittneses you CT's about hearing explosions are taken out of context, which is a typical tactic you guys use. There were plenty of noises that day that were explosions, from falling debris to bodies to airplane etc... this does not mean it was demolitions, cameras would of clearly picked it up and evidence of explosives would be EVERYWHERE over the city.
Wrong terrorism is not a crime like a simple murder. its a TACTIC, used to frighten people out of their normal lifestyle. to say it is "minimal" is just sad and wrong. Bombings,Kidnappings and Hostage-Takings,Armed Attacks and Assassinations,Arsons and Firebombings,Hijackings and Skyjackings,robberies and extortion,Cyber Terror. After 9/11 the stock market shut down and we went into a recession. During the 90's we IGNORED 6 terror attacks and look where inaction got us. You are out of touch.
Why would you diminish and trivialize the damage this tactic called "terrorism" has had on people lives and economies around the world by calling it a "scam"?
You also say that you "don't believe there is a terrorism problem around the world"
Tell that to the families who had loved ones die in Madrid,England,Pakistan,Israel,families of 9/11. This tactic TARGETS innocent civilians and sit on your little elite high horse calling it a "Scam". No don't be hysterical about it, but it is reality.
> Why would you diminish and trivialize the damage this tactic called "terrorism" has had on people lives and economies around the world by calling it a "scam"?
Any time someone is killed, it is devastating for their loved ones. The difference between this "tactic" and murder is the government has jumped on this as a rationale to go to war and shred the Constitution. The scale of the violence doesn't justify this response, even on an international level, but especially in the US.
Rational? Umm yes the 9/11 attack, the Cole attack, the embassy attacks are an act of war, that groups like Al-Quada have chosen to take part in and have declared more attacks on the US and our allies. i can't think of a better reason to go to war in Afganistan and Rid the world of these sick radicals. Why don't you start blaming them for once instead of the "government" and speaking of the constitution the #1 job of the president is to protect its citizens, invading Afghanistan was necessary.
Pop. Mech? Show me any such statement by MIT, etc. No one wants to step into this. It is quiet. I am not an alex jones or D. Avery fan. I have read posts like yours before. allmost 'borg like. The media fed us live lies. And the bld's fell at 8 floors per sec. my 1959 500+hp Corvette did 12.8@113. w/ a good launch 11.8s.@120ish. WTC is faster than my vette. if you say it fell in 14-15 sec, thats still a 90+mph 1/4mile. weird.
Yes, Popular Mechanics and MIT etc.. all have done investigations into the claims and facts surrounding 9/11. I have the links to these website for ANYONE who wants to see REAL experts instead of a little college boy with Mac who knows jack about structural engineering and demolitions.
Those stats are interesting, can you give me a link to it-I'd love to see it for myself. Should all the men and woman who have died in this useless war been included within those stats? Their deaths are a byproduct of 911, aren't they?
> Their deaths are a byproduct of 911, aren't they?
No. Iraq is not about 9/11. 9/11 is a false rationale for the Iraq war. The thousands of American deaths and the million+ Iraqi deaths are a direct consequence of Bush administration policy.
your work will be important in showing to the public how the wtc buildings faling were not pancakes! 10 pancakes per second is pancake batter. i am surprized at how many people in the SF Bay area with 'real' educations think (like i did untill 9-1-07) the "Nova"/"history channel" documentary version is accurate. I cant even get OLD friends to look at this. they get emotional.
Give me a break, Not just the History channel disagrees with that absurd 9/11 conspiracy nonsense. So does MIT,Purdue U,Columbia U,American Scientific Mag,Pop Mechanics,Implosion world demolitions,American Society of Civil engineers,National Institute for Science and Technology Etc.. of course never mind the real experts when you have non experts like Dylan Avery or Alex Jones on your side making money off of selling their moronic theories to dopey kids or haters.
Well, tell me how much Larry Silverstein and Frank Lowy made out of insurance for WTC towers as well as those who bought put options days before 9/11.
As we write the insurance payments are not going to reach $7.1 billion. The current situation is $4.6 billion at a maximum, although this may be subject to change (up or down) as a result of court rulings.
And of course this isn't profit for Silverstein. The money is being provided for him to rebuild the WTC complex, and it turns out that's quite expensive ($6.3 billion in April 2006.
What about that Liberty Bonds? - Congress approved $8 billion in "Liberty Bonds"...If New York actually uses its 9/11 rebuilding money at Ground Zero, and Silverstein gets all the Liberty Bonds (with their low interest rate of about 6.5 percent), his future income from the towers would be worth $5.7 billion to $7.5 billion in today's dollars. At those values, the project is economical even if rents never rise to Midtown levels(end quote). Silverstein's no fool. He made/makes sure he gets more.
Hmmm, ok...for one thing around $4.6 billion in insurance money, $6.3 billion in costs to rebuild, Not such a great deal, then. Whats more, dont imagine the insurance companies have handed over all of this money. Secondly,you think Larry planned the attack with random dudes to fly planes into not only the two WTC's but also the pentagon and a random plane in the air over PA, So he could rebuild some buildings where the Two WTC's hoping that he would make "future money"? makes zero sense.
Well, didn't I tell you that WTC was not popular anymore and they wanted to get rid of them. In order to do so properly, they had to remove all the asbestos etc toxic materials before destroying the towers but that would have cost a billion or two dollars. They saved a LOT there. Also, 9/11 is a combination of all kinds of crimes. But their ultimate goal was to start wars. Afghan, Iraq, never ending 'War on Terror'(fraud), and war on our freedom and rights!
1. There is NOTHING in Afganistan it a baron desert.
2. Saddam had broken the cease fire agreement of 1992 which made it 100% legal for us to invade, not only that he broke 17 UN resolutions the last one being a "FINAL" resolutions with
"serious consequences" to befall if he broke it, which he did. He supported terrorists and had training camps in iraq, and he murdered over 500,000 of his own people. So we did not need to do some moronic attack on ourselves to do these things.
Change of the subject cause you couldn't deny what I wrote? Haven't you read "ONE HUNDRED FIFTH CONGRESS SECOND SESSION FEBRUARY 12, 1998"? Read what Mr. Malesca of Unocal told your lawmakers then. And you don't seem to know what happened on July 25, 1990 between then-US Ambassador to Iraq April Glaspie and President Saddam Hussein. Along with 'Kuwaiti refugee girl Naira's testimony' at the Congress. We were all lied to, mate. It's time to wake up! And who gave Saddam the weapon? THE U$A!!
Its not changing the subject you said some stupid unprovable claim about knocking down the towers on 9/11 so they would not have to pay for asbestos removal. That does not deserve an answer, its incorrect.
Who gave Saddam what weapon? he got weapons from all over the place is the owner of a Gun Store responsible for a murder if the murder uses the gun NO! Saddam is responsible for his own actions, we did not make him kill a half a million of his own people.
Well, you need to tell me how much it would have cost to remove all the toxins if they properly destroyed those buildings. Also,
U.S. Exports of Biological Materials to Iraq
The Senate Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs has oversight responsibility for the Export Administration Act. Pursuant to the Act, Committee staff contacted the U.S. Department of Commerce and requested information on the export of biological materials during the years prior to the Gulf War. (continued)
(2)After receiving this information, we contacted a principal supplier of these materials to determine what, if any, materials were exported to Iraq which might have contributed to an offensive or defensive biological warfare program. Records available from the supplier for the period from 1985 until the present show that during this time, pathogenic (meaning "disease producing"), toxigenic (meaning "poisonous"), and other biological research materials were exported to Iraq pursuant ...
(3)to application and licensing by the U.S. Department of Commerce. Records prior to 1985 were not available, according to the supplier.
(end) Your country provided those WMD to Saddam. I have a list of the weapons the US gave him that my friend in the US military sent me. That's what Saddam used on Kurds. And talking about figures, the US killed half a million children and babies via sanctions, and Madeleine Albright said, "We Think the Price Is Worth It." Seems that's fine with you, eh?
(4)Saddam already is being tried in the killings of more than 140 Shiites in a town north of Baghdad.(from AP article). If Saddam was to be executed(though I'm not sure if real Saddam really died or not), so is Albright. And Bush et al for killing more than 1.2million innocent Iraqis during this invasion which was based on lies such as 9/11. Oh, you ignore the story about April Glaspie and Naira, who turned out to be then Kuwaiti Ambassador's daughter! All Hill and Knowlton's job. Performance!
Mr. Chandler, you don't get the point of terrorism.
Anyone from outside the US laughs about your theory, because terrorism is real and happens in countries all over the world.
ETA, IRA, Al-Quida, RAF etc. You think all these organisations... are govenment 'inventions'? It may be interesting to think that the government intends to kill its own citizens. But don't forget there are always extremist nuts around.
NotableJInx2 3 months ago in playlist Weitere Videos von DavidSChandler
@NotableJInx2 "One mans terrorist is another mans freedom fighter!"~Gerald Seymour
santuryu 3 weeks ago in playlist WAKE UP!
@santuryu
idiot.
NotableJInx2 2 weeks ago
God Bless you David you make the teaching profession proud!
pauladamkim 3 months ago
Sexual behaviors, 20,000????
What am I missing here?
I must be doing it wrong...or right...or maybe not damn near enough.
motonegros 4 months ago
While we can deny that a criminal class is running the anglo-saxon empire.
Everything scam possible is before our eyes. To deny it is living is fear.
Our societies time to grow up is now or live as indebted slaves forever.
Divorcing ourselves from the criminal class is the only hope.
Catherine Austin Fitts
911truthncDotOrg 4 months ago
They destroyed the amtrax strain archive. So no investigation was possible.
pcuimac 4 months ago
You've been on Youtube since 2006 and you've never heard of israeli involvement in Sept 11? Or the 200 caught spying? Or even the 5 dancing israelis?
I think thats a scam right there despite your good intentions seeking truth.
StopFundingIsrael 6 months ago
@StopFundingIsrael Whether some other country had a hand in 9/11 I don't know, but they could not possibly have done it without coordinating with US agencies. We need to get our own house in order before pointing fingers elsewhere.
DavidSChandler 4 months ago
What?! Build a fence to keep American murderers out of foreign counties? How many Americans go into Mexico and Canada and kill their citizens? The problem is Mexican drug cartels are killing OUR citizens. They are also the ones who kill innocent Mexicans in Mexico's border towns, not Americans. I don't see how this has anything to do with the so called war on terror though, as the US has NOT secured its boarders. Proof that they are not worried about Drug Lords OR terrorists crossing over.
Quintapus 7 months ago
@Quintapus You don't know ironical humor when you see it. The only reason drug cartels exist, however, is because we make it profitable through prohibition and the phony drug war. It is high time to take the profit motive out of drugs and treat addiction as a disease.
DavidSChandler 4 months ago
@strange NIST didnt use the actual numbers. They decreased the steel dimensions, calculated with more kerosin, increased the heat etc. It was a simulation to suit their theory.
fisheye441 8 months ago
"The real danger we face is not from terrorism but what is being done under the pretext of fighting it."
Michael Parenti
MichaelParentiOrg 8 months ago
@MichaelParentiOrg I don't know why this was flagged as spam. (I unflagged it.) I don't know if MichaelParentiOrg is actually Michael Parenti or not, but the comment is valid.
DavidSChandler 4 months ago
@DavidSChandler Thank you David much appreciated! This friends channel is indeed created with Dr. Parenti's consent. He can't answer all mail personallly although he tries to do so as much as possible. Sadly Dr. Parenti is familiar with being "censored" as so many others who speak out uncomfortable truths but we are not sure what happened in this case... we did notice Dr. Parenti/his channel is very limited in the number of post allowed recieving YT Spam warnings on regular base.
MichaelParentiOrg 4 months ago
@DavidSChandler Dr. Parenti has a facebook profile where he answers his fans personally and recently started his own Blog! I'll send you the links in a personal message, you can find many more links on his channel.
Thanks again for your support and sharing your own work!
Kind Regards, Michael Parenti YT friends
MichaelParentiOrg 4 months ago
David, I agree that fearmongering about terrorism hasn't done any good in the USA, and the War on Terror has been conspicuous in its failure. But are you pretending that Al Qaeda and terror networks don't exist? Or just that the 3,000 civilians killed on 9/11 aren't that important in the big picture?
And as far as "conjuring up" a nonexistent enemy, what are you and AE911Truth doing with your pseudoscientific claims about controlled demolition of the WTCs?
unRompecabezas 10 months ago
@unRompecabezas Al Qaeda exists. It was created by the CIA to fight the soviets in Afghanistan. There is overwhelming evidence that the North and South Towers and WTC7 were brought down with explosives. See 911speakout org
DavidSChandler 4 months ago
@unRompecabezas 'pseudoscientific ' ? there is nothing theoretical about the well documented anomalies that prove beyond all reasonable doubt that additional energy sources were present in the destruction of wtc 1 2 & 7. For ex: the 100 day fires w/excessive temps (2800f a week later) Molten metal documented in the fema BPAT & small iron spheres in the dust. WTC7 in symmetrical freefall, how explosive 1&2 were the it pulverized all that concrete and over 1000 people remain unaccounted for, etc
winston2015 1 month ago
@winston2015 "Well-documented anomalies"? You mean to tell me you think there's something suspicious about not being able to locate victims' remains when 100-story buildings collapse and leave a huge pile of rubble that smolders for weeks?
unRompecabezas 1 month ago
i guess you didnt hear or see about the huge planes crashing into the world trade center. The buildings blow up, and 3000 people dead. Yeah, thats not a threat!
KripDrip 10 months ago
The terror "scam" you're talking about is only speaking about the U.S., there are countries that are threaten by terrorists.
4FunPlayin 11 months ago
I just cannot believe that anyone can look at the facts of 9/11 and not see that the problems and conflicts with official accounts go waaayyyy beyond anticipated anomalies in any unprecedented event! Molten metal, -'high temp erosion' documented by gov scientists in may 2002 (see FEMA BPAT App C), 99 days fires 'would not go out,' temps to 2800f (see Bechtel readings), pulverized concrete, 1100 missing bodies, dissembled superstructures, WTC7, the micro-spheres (not fly ash!), harrit report etc
winston2015 1 year ago
Last one.
So are you saying somebody has done it already?
As I very much doubt it. the same could be done for WT1+2 but that is a much harder fish to fry. The explosive connections pdfs are getting there though, way over my head mind. But it's coming, all of this revolves around eventually pressing RUN on a computer model and replicating what happened to 1,2 and 7.
STRANGEtownVIDEO 1 year ago
It's a brain trick. If the brain recieves one visual stimuli with other crap facts it has to except it, a connection is made.
If you parody, present another visual stimuli that matches real life more than the other, the brain will dismiss the lesser automatically. That's what brains do on a simple level. That's why 9/11 worked so well and that's why it WILL work so well.
The brain cannot handle two versions, it will automatically drop the funky one and then what is it left with?
The truth.
STRANGEtownVIDEO 1 year ago
I've googled it and have found no evidence of anybody trying to prove the demolition via physics models. If there was a new report that is what they would do.
I read the report last night and my computer is not quite up to it. Making tunes yes but not the physics of a 46 story building. Maybe lots of peoples pcs number crunching through the night could do it, i don't know how to do that.
I'm sure it would take a while to match the sequence but once it was done it would work every time
STRANGEtownVIDEO 1 year ago
It may be a demonstration of the obvious, but it is not that obvious or we wouldn't be having this conversation. Using the same software to match to the newly released evidence, to figure out the detonation sequence is not obvious. I'm on your side dude but if we want to prove it then PROVE IT. At the moment it is a collection of facts.
A report with a picture of the physics model on the front actually looking like real life is a BIG thing.
STRANGEtownVIDEO 1 year ago
@STRANGEtownVIDEO "I'm correct in thinking nobody has thought of it before then?"
I didn't mean to imply that. It's just that most of the modeling I have seen is centered around demonstrations that it couldn't happen the way NIST said it happened. Simply blowing out 8 floors would be more of a demonstration of the obvious, but it might be worth doing anyway.
DavidSChandler 1 year ago
If for some reason guys can't do it, give me links to the relevant software and building plans and I'll do it because I'm sick and tired of this terror bullshit.
But if you do do it let me know as i have a song brewing in my mind for this too.
My email is strangetowncollectiveATliveDOTcoDOTuk. I'd love to talk less publically so to speak if you would too.
Love ya Dave, you were the one that inspired me.
STRANGEtownVIDEO 1 year ago
Use their report against them. Copy it but use the truth, the undeniable check it out yourself because WE are NOT HIDING CALCULATIONS and MEASUREMENTS TRUTH.
PROVE IT rather than dis-proving theirs.
Then call them out on it. The visual LOVELYNESS of such a video on youtube, viraled through email will be a beautiful sight. And approachable by anybody watching it. If I'm right,
2011 is gonna be the year we get NIST's BALLS ON A PLATTER.
Love ya Dave!
STRANGEtownVIDEO 1 year ago
(This is all gonna be back to front)
Use explosives that are under their threshold, then you can use ALL the evidence in your report and they can't argue as it's out of their remit.
Then make a video with the three videos
NIST REAL LIFE OUR VIDEO in sync
HA! HA! Give the report to Buildingwaht who have just been on Fox and watch the sparks fly!!
STRANGEtownVIDEO 1 year ago
Dave, it's the best idea I've ever come up with. I'm correct in thinking nobody has thought of it before then?
Y'know your video with the reporters mic:
BOOM BOOM boom boom boom boom boom boom boom
If you can sequence the explosions to match that.......
Then you A&E guys can do your own report. Copy NIST's.
Use the same font and size paper etc just like drinks cans are the same but with different logos (A&E logo).
STRANGEtownVIDEO 1 year ago
Hi Dave
Why don't you use the software NIST used with a model of WT7 and blow out 18 floors in a controlled demolition sequence?
Bet you it looks like the real life video
STRANGEtownVIDEO 1 year ago
@STRANGEtownVIDEO
You know, that is actually not a bad idea.
DavidSChandler 1 year ago
Supposed "terrorist threats" is constantly pushed on the people through the media. Comedians make jokes about "terrorists", dumbed down FACEBOOK using women talk non-stop about people "looking like terrorists", the news bombards you with "terrorist plots" that no one else but them knows about, and so on and so on..
This just shows how stupid people have become to constantly fall for the same simple-minded ploy. Again and again and again...
Shehasnomorals 1 year ago
Great video good ideas backed up by actual facts which is refreshing, I wonder where fox news gets given there tripe from ?
yourmumstube78 1 year ago
Do you know who died from the anthrax letters? The editor and photographer for the publisher of National Enquirer who published the photos of the Bush twins drunk. Remember that photo of them falling down drunk? So what does that tell you. The guy who did it at Ft. Detrick was jewish. WhatReallyHappenedDOTCom has the whole story. I believe his name was Dr. Zack. Remember the phony letters said ""Death to Israel" on them? Total arab set up. Just like 9-11. Google the "Dr. Alan Sabrosky interview"
777Lazerus 1 year ago
@warshell514
Highly enlightened comment right there. I bet you watch wrestling and think its real too?
gosciu555 1 year ago
Terrorism is a psychological device used to stampede people into war or whatever else is wanted. Meaning, if you want to attack country "X" or group "Y" you create a group that is associated or similar to that group and you attack *yourself,* giving you plausible claimability to say said group "fucked with us" and justification for a "defensive" retaliation.
This is what Ed Landsdale did in the Philipines to get Magsaysay elected. Its the most obvious thing in the world.
gosciu555 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
basically, in a nut-shell, you have your head so far up your ass you don't know if you're coming or going
shanquilla562 1 year ago
Yep, and more people die each year from seasonal flu (30,000+) than by swine flu...16,000+
Cstrife234 1 year ago
David,
After viewing a few of your videos I'm left wondering if you actually hold a degree in Physics? Just to be clear, I know you teach physics I'm asking if you hold a degree in physics. Thanks :)
Physman2011 1 year ago
Wow man, I get it!
the light bulb just flashed on!
Very heavy ... you see, when "joe nobody" dies because of a drive-by or dies of cancer because he has smoked for 40 years.... that doesn't cost AMERICA (that is daddy big bux) a lot of money, HOWEVER an event like 9/11/2001 that completely destroys the WTC and seriously damages many other buildings, that cost big bux! So it is the reason why we have a "war on terror" ....
HEAVY!
& just like the War on Poverty or War on Drugs, ... its bogus!
Charlie666XZ 1 year ago
alienentity1: Yes, the terrorist threat is used to take away our liberties. It is also used to make war in lots of places. Government and media manipulate public opinion so "we the people" beg them to do these things. Professional demolition brought down the 3 buildings on 9/11. Was it US insiders, Terrorists, or Other?
ChristianFam6 1 year ago
ShaeFan: David is suggesting that we shouldn't live by fear of what MIGHT happen. You agree with David when you state "assess risks based on evidence". Yet, you insinuate that nuclear threat is more imminent than terrorist threat.
The point is that the terrorism threat is non existent. It is solely based in government and media newsspeak and doubletalk. The nuclear and terrorism and lightening threats can only exist if we believe and act on any newsspeak and doubletalk about them.
ChristianFam6 1 year ago
I totally agree that the terrorism threat is greatly exaggerated, and is used as an excuse to cut down civil liberties and also to invade other countries.
But 9/11 Truthers destroy their own credibility by focusing on outlandish conspiracy theories that have no relevance to the truth of terrorism.
Every time a truther claims the WTC towers were demolished by the government, they deflect away from serious criticism of the government.
This is your best argument, David. The CD stuff is ridiculous
AlienEntity1 1 year ago
Everyone should ask themselves Cui Bono - who benefits?
The war on Tobacco would not justify a police state. The war on terror puts the American people in a state of fear that allows the state to bamboozle us into giving up our Liberty at an unprecedented rate.
"He that would make his own Liberty secure, must guard even his enemy from oppression. For if he violates this duty, he establishes a precedent that will surely reach to himself." - Thomas Paine
schwank167 1 year ago
David,
Google Tegenlicht energy risk.
A recent Dutch documentry
Maybe you'll find it interesting.
WTFaboutWTC7 1 year ago
Thanks David for all your work with AE 9/11 truth.
You are true patriot sir!
NefariousEquivocator 1 year ago
I fear David SChandler's life is going to be shorter than he realizes... Anyone who brings light to this issue will have to deal with heart conditions, brain tumors, pancreatic cancer or worse... be subject to character assassination.
Good luck David.
batfly 1 year ago
Israel--not Muslims--did 9/11 along with traitors within the US we might name "Kosher Nostra" or "Zioncons"
Rediscover911 com
We are conditioned not to criticize those who deceptively scheme to control us.
whole2th 1 year ago
Surprised you still have this up after the attempted act of terrorism aboard flight 253. Could you please address the following questions?
Do you believe that... a. The US Government had anything to do with flight 253 and b. that terrorism is not a significant cause for concern. It seems both of your exceedingly weak arguments are falling apart in one fell swoop.
Physman2011 2 years ago
Has it ever crossed your mind why Al Qaeda only uses operatives who are half-baked, and who know very little about blowing up aircraft?
Operatives who are spectacularly ineffective after one almost perfect attack in Hollywood blockbuster-style gave Bush an open cheque for war from both a nation and a world, who had put their critical thinking faculties on hold?
All your liberties have vanished, barring those that keep you a consumer-slave.
The best slave needs no chains.
zen4men 1 year ago
Yes, it is all a scam. Don't waste time worrying about it though, the new world order will not succeed. As a matter of fact it will fail and fall so fast so hard that it will never again rise its ugly head ever again for eternity.
puffrooster 2 years ago
Thank you for this cogent discussion of an important issue.
2leftfield 2 years ago 2
Thanks for some simple facts!
Some people must have slammed cold numbers into their heads, before realizing a scam!
Tressco 2 years ago
David, the weakness in your primary argument in this video is that concern for an existential threat cannot be based solely on numbers of past deaths. Rather it is based on the number of potential deaths if an event occurs.
Using your standard of past deaths, one could conclude that nuclear weapons are not a threat because no American has yet died from one. Yet such weapons are an appropriate concern, or should be.
ShaeFan 2 years ago
Are you suggesting we live by fear of what might possibly happen rather than assess risks based on evidence?
DavidSChandler 2 years ago 6
Comment removed
ShaeFan 2 years ago
I'm suggesting you are correct that foreign terrorism is less a threat than we are told, but not because there have been relatively few American deaths. Instead its because the government lies to us. False flag operations have destroyed Americans' trust in anything the government says about terrorism.
We therefore face two threats as sitting ducks: real jihad and false flag attacks orchestrated by government.
Thanks for your important analysis of the WTC1 corner column destruction.
ShaeFan 2 years ago
@ShaeFan Nuclear weapons aren't a threat. The only country ever to use them in war has been the USA, because we're the only ones with the audacity and lack of conscience to blow up tens of thousands of people in two different residential/agricultural areas that were not militarily involved. Not only killing people, but leaving radiation to poison their progeny and people for ages to come. I'm not afraid of Nukes. Nuclear power is all over the place...should we be worried about that too?
Cstrife234 1 year ago
@ShaeFan
Yeah but Nuclear weapons exist as oppose to "terrorists" which is a scam.
gosciu555 1 year ago
This man is honest and true to himself, whatever you believe about 9/11.
To call him names only tells us about the name caller.
whatever2dont 2 years ago 4
As an aside did you state that the anthrax situation was not investigated? Despite the fact that you clearly have not researched the anthrax incident you still manage to speculate about the perpetrator and possible ties to the government...amazing. I guess I shouldn't be surprised this is the type of speculative, knee jerk, irresponsible statement that dominates the truth movement.
Physman2011 2 years ago
Physman2011 you are either really retarded or have you're head up in your deep ass. It appears that you've missed seeing how the 3 NYC buildings came down deliberately by demolition all the same exact way in its foot print. Not to mention, one of them wasn't hit by a plain. Thermite and related chemicals have been found all over NYC from the dust, that it self is enough proof to prosecute these 9/11 Central Banking Enron lying piss of shit people. Now stop lying and start uniting with the truth.
Annuunnaki 2 years ago
When you call someone retarded you should make sure you don't make blatant errors in your post (i.e. plain instead of plane). Seems like you're just repeating the truther propaganda 1. Buildings fell into their own footprint (yes gravity pulls straight down) 2. Thermite and related chemicals (just because particular elements were, possibly, found in the dust does not mean that thermite was used. That's why the only chemist to make that claim published in an open source journal).
Physman2011 2 years ago
And it's "piece of shit" not "piss of shit" at least get your insults right. Do you live in the United States...your profile states you do but I find that hard to believe.
Physman2011 2 years ago
The only way I can describe you! Ignorant idiot, even numbers which prove a point dont get through your stupid head. If youre an American I am ashamed to be categorized as an American next to morons like you. Either you are really stupid or you work for these scrums
Annuunnaki 2 years ago
Well you've resorted to name calling...not too surprising really. Anyway I don't have any more time to waste on you. Are there any truthers out there who will engage in civil, intelligent debate?
Physman2011 2 years ago
Since intelligence is not anywhere near your vicinity this is the only way to deal with traitors like you.
Annuunnaki 2 years ago
@Physman2011 Ask elsewhere. They all do the same thing. Name calling and childish ad hominem attacks.
759009946576 1 year ago
Have you done any research? The 1993 WTC bombing, the US embassy bombings in Tanzania and Kenya, the USS Cole bombing not to mention those attacks that have been foiled (e.g. 2000 plot to bomb LAX). Stating that terrorism is not a threat based solely on the statistics is disingenuous and specious at best. As you mention in your video the purpose of terrorism is to instill a sense of terror.....which the statistics you cite do not measure.
Physman2011 2 years ago
Comment removed
reinvestigate911 2 years ago
Comment removed
reinvestigate911 2 years ago
Comment removed
reinvestigate911 2 years ago
Comment removed
reinvestigate911 2 years ago
I guess you didn't understand my comment.
Physman2011 2 years ago
Thank you for speaking the truth and waking up the sheeples of our country!
Annuunnaki 2 years ago
LOL epic we both have the same first n last name badazz
davchandler 2 years ago
Please reconcile this stupidity with current event.
Thanks in advance.
drzhivagho 2 years ago
5*
Thank you!
Marc57273 2 years ago 8
You're both cherry picking and avoiding what i showed you.
Regardless of anything else. Again 6 of the 10 member of the 9/11 commission said the investigation was botched and a criminal investigation should be done.
This was in the Washington Post. Regardless of everything else. That alone should make you question everything.
I've said my peace, be safe.
P.S. cross your finger and hope 10/15 doesn't happen either.
st4ticblu3 2 years ago
Watch David's video on the tower falling data.
Shows that the tower was falling at FREEFALL speeds. This means that the building below the impact site was providing NO resistance. The huge solid core basically disappeared. The anti-topple theory is one explanation which fits the data and the video evidence. Of course any such demolition system would be a matter of national security and secret. This type of system would be a logical followup to the attack that happened in 1993.
agile1111 2 years ago
There is the anti-topple theory that goes like this:
You rig these buildings so they can be destroyed in the event that they are about to topple. They waited until the last possible moment to push the button and probably started the sequence immediateley after the buildings started to fail at the impact points. Thus we see what we saw in the videos. Instead of toppling over at the weak impact points the buildings were vaporized from the top down. This was done as a safety measure.
agile1111 2 years ago
agile, thats weak and premeditated. JLaw, There are many difficult points in any adequate description. "Official"/you or "inside job"/US.... Sound cancellation technology can offset sounds. the WTC can "consume" noise. There are videos with a series of few distinct explosion sounds occurring. It goes down sequentially 8-10 floors per/sec. I posted my '59 Vette: 12.8sec@112mph. The WTC arguably was quicker. Just seems odd. All of it. Why not 40 floors and a big 60 story mess? all of it.
IExposeMormonism 2 years ago
What you need to do is pay close attention to the modern developments in demolition technology. The once thought "impossible" (by you OCT'ers) top-down demolition has been done a handful of times now. There is even demolition software out there that can accurately predict the exact way a building will collapse once rigged. All the concrete pulverization, etc is simulated. Pay attention to these developments and you will know (sooner or later) what they used.
JSSTyger 2 years ago
btw Bushco owns the history channel, nat geo, etc.
JSSTyger 2 years ago
You know...I would definitely like to know where people get the loony idea that buildings are designed to collapse a certain way. I really would. WHO THE H DESIGNS A BUILDNIG WITH COLLAPSE IN MIND? YOU DESIGN A BUILDING THATS AS STRUCTURALLY STABLE (AND ECONOMICAL) AS POSSILBLE. You don't say "oh lets remove some I-beams here and there so, if the bldg collapses, it has a smoother ride down.
You don't build two 500,000 ton structures in fear of collapse. You build it to support itself.
JSSTyger 2 years ago
watch?v=GsUtvOW6SR0
watch?v=xD126r9ihaw
watch?v=-duOjP-cevk
watch?v=moc0KK4zYDk
watch?v=6Y9EGC60GDw
ujisx 2 years ago
I see you've stopped taking your medications.......?
I bet you also believe that the moon landing was fake, that Elvis is still alive and that Kennedy was assassinated by aliens......
xXxRadicalDreamerxXx 2 years ago
"prescription drugs: 32,000" deaths per year in the USA - DavidSChandler
More Americans die by the hand of thier own doctor and pharmacist, than at the hand of a "terrosit".
Thanks for speaking the truth, David.
DrChebutykin 2 years ago 2
Very well said. If the people could only wake up!
TheEndofLore 2 years ago
Mr Chandler a thinking person such as yourself can easily see the real truth of 911 , However many other thinking people who are locked into there POSITIONS and POWER are afraid to question the gov's offical STORY ....Those of us who fear not will stand with you and TRUMPET the truth as loud as we can. Thank you sir for your courage. The best to you .............Chris
ahblisschris 2 years ago 4
Thank you, it's good to hear someone with intelligence speak to the realities of what's really going on in this country.
wat700son 2 years ago 10
Comment removed
ujisx 2 years ago
Listen from (6:30-6:55).
watch?v=w4Vrsjs_cLg
Then this one.
watch?v=ESaIEVxLnK4
ujisx 2 years ago
The murders did not bring down the buildings like they should have is your argument if murders bought down the buildings they would have cared more about reducing property damage. That can only makes sense to a 9/11 Commission/NIST conspiracy theorist.
The video and audio tracks have been proven to have been tampered with. That is why many of them do have any audio in them to cover up the sound of all the explosions that all kinds of eyewitness talk about.
ujisx 2 years ago
I showed the evidence that at least one person in the government was involved in 911 at the very least as an accessory to first degree murder and the evidence that people should have been subpoenaed by the 9/11 Commission conspiracy theorist but were not by the statement made by Patty Casazza which has been out there for a long time. There is no late breaking news in any of that or that there are many crimes the US government has committed against humanity and have never been investigated.
ujisx 2 years ago
911 was used to start 2 wars and kill hundreds of thousands of people and anybody who does not know that war is the most profitable thing a central bank and the military industrial complex can undertake is completely brainwashed out of reality completely and is not worth wasting any time with and then to suggest beyond that, that Alex Jones and Steven Jones are saying these things to make money after all that is just completely insane.
JLaw012 obviously confused and lost.
watch?v=dvFuRYyEkiU
ujisx 2 years ago
Energy must not only be added but the release of that energy must be timed and targeted correctly to achieve the results we saw. Compare ground zero at Hiroshima and Nagasaki to WTC.
The floors above the impact zone disintegrate and explode off to the side of the building not that any of that would matter but that is what in fact happens.
watch?v=xG2y50Wyys4
Here is the ridiculous 911 physics.
watch?v=klat9sGGwVU
ujisx 2 years ago
Comment removed
ujisx 2 years ago
Task #1: The energy in gravity cannot cause the near free fall speeds.
Task #2: The energy in gravity cannot cause a symmetrical failure.
Task #3: The energy in gravity cannot cause the pulverization.
There is just way too much resistance in WTC 1, 2 and 7 for gravity to complete the work necessary for just one of those tasks in each building to the bottom let alone to complete all 3 tasks simultaneously in each building. Energy cannot be used twice at the same time.
ujisx 2 years ago
What has to happen to get that fast of a global collapse is thousands of joints across the full area have to simultaneously break the resistance below the falling debris above it before it collides with the resistance below it otherwise the collapse will at the very least be slowed down by that resistance below the near free falling speeds of debris above it.
ujisx 2 years ago
Look at the debris photos. WTC 1, 2, and 7 disintegrated and were global collapses completely leveled in rubble. Buildings just do not come down like that by chance or luck if they could there would be no need for controlled demolition companies. Gravity just does not contain anywhere near enough energy to produce what we saw. No science was ever needed to prove that, their conspiracy theory is that ridiculous. It does not matter what they say is going on in the buildings. Gravity cannot do that
ujisx 2 years ago
You cannot get anywhere near free fall speed without removing all the resistance below that which is falling from above before it collides with the resistance below not to mention a global collapse and the complete pulverization we saw.
ujisx 2 years ago
WTC 1 and 2 were designed to withstand 10 times the load from what is above it so as you proceed down the building the amount of resistance increases. WTC 1 and 2 debris explodes off to the side as both buildings disintegrate into dust clear down to the bottom while facing increasing resistance to stop the collapse from below. Gravity does not contain any where near enough energy to do that, it is not even anywhere near close.
watch?v=dtx_GcFCs6c
ujisx 2 years ago
Yeah - terrorism is a scam - 300,000 Darfuris have not really been murdered, 100,000 Algerian civilians were not really butchered by Islamists, the Taliban do not really murder civilians in Swat, fundamentalists do not really destroy girl's schools or throw acid in their faces..... Beslan, Bali, Mumbai, Madrid and London never happened.....
Keep repeating the lie and it will be believed.
Yawn..........
AdultAlchemist 2 years ago
No... We DO have terrorists. It's just not what the TV says it is.
And we have had a categorization for terrorism for a long time.
whatshendrix 2 years ago
You're right.
Gilgamesh73 2 years ago
Good point about anthrax: once the case against Steven Hatfill collapsed, the government lost interest.
The anthrax letters pointed to Hatfill because the return address of one included "The Greendale School". Greendale was a suburb of Salisbury, Rhodesia (now Harare, Zimbabwe) where Hatfill worked. Hatfill lied about his accomplishments on his resume. He made a good villain for the story. Find the people who framed Steven Hatfill and you have your terrorists. The government is not interested.
Skeptic121 2 years ago
I don't believe the govt account of things.
That being said. The govt would use these statistics to say that all the laws, security measures etc they have have employed since 2001 have prevented further attacks on U.S soil.
This is one way they might try to squeeze out of it.
I still believe there are plenty of things about 911 and this so called was on terror that don't add up. Lets keep questioning!
tapiwakay 2 years ago
I was the first to post on this video, the only video DSC allows posting on. I said then "Your work is going to be important to the future..." that comment still here on page one and is still true. the WTC's were loaded with very sophisticated explosives. The sequential 8-12 floors per second is unrefutable.
IExposeMormonism 2 years ago
Thank you. Good to see at least 1 fellow American looks at the information and THINKS about what it means. Indeed, I always wondered why do we Americans lose freedoms and rights when we were not the culprits. Bleah.
Austyg 2 years ago
did saddam attack the america.. noooooo. it's just dust in the eye. they are paving the way for israel. bastards
mythraWASaChristian 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
The war on "terrorism" is nothing but tilting at windmills. The mere "terrorist" concept is nothing more than an illusion, created by the US government in order to mentaly manipulate the population to go into war at these fabled enemies. It is not the first time this method is utilized by the leaders of a nations (e.g Adolf Hitler.) Very much like the US government (when they destroyed the world trade center and blamed "terrorists") Hitler burned down the Reichtag and blamed communists.
fingtyin 2 years ago
The anthrax thing was wrapped up by blaming it on a guy "Who just by shear luck (LOL)" happened to kill himself just before they charged him with it.
Of course they found the guy years later just when he doesn't want to live anymore. I love how people buy these stories so quickly.
Wake up people, because any one of us might be unlucky enough to be on the wrong plane or open the wrong envelope with Anthrax or be in the wrong city when a baby nuke goes off.
The guilty must be put away.
MoJoSB 2 years ago
You have my respect, great videos, great viewpoint! 5 stars.
90210bt 3 years ago
"Should we be having a war on aspirin".
HA HA HA. Go David.
loccysmif 3 years ago
ahhhhhh
aceman911 3 years ago
im trying to post a comment, it won't let me. have we lost our right for freedom of speech on the internet too!
aceman911 3 years ago
Spot on, this is what I have been saying too.
Spread the word, wake up sheeple.
Terrorism is mentioned a number of times a day on the BBC bullsh*t news.
Lookup2Wakeup 3 years ago
Holy Moly, you have a disconcertingly fertile manner of unleashing idea viruses sir!
Where the hail have you been? I've scoured video land seeking your simple, comprehensive explanations of our reality - especially since the 9 11 show came on the air.
Marshall McLuhan was right. This medium packs a heck of a message and I thank you for yours, Mr. Chandler. Excellent video.
barrywilliamsmb 3 years ago
As I've said, the purpose of the War on Terror isn't to wage war against terror, but to use terror as an excuse to wage war.
Great video.
Ewilds 3 years ago
this has been my thought for a while! terror is a state of mind! i like to say a way of thinking! this is how we are controled.not with guns,by thought process!!
sn9696 3 years ago
Hey David, I appreciate your views. The statistics helped me put things in perspective. I'd love to hear what you have to say about the military industrial complex, and it's role in 911 and the war on terror.
bassofone 3 years ago
Hi David, thanks for great statistics....your research is appreciated!
Scoppertop 3 years ago 2
David, I agree 100% with everything you say. RIP to all those who lost their lives on September 11th.
Love from Ireland.
SarPixie1986 3 years ago 2
David, I agree 100% with everything you say. RIP to all those who lost their lives on September 11th.
Love from South Africa.
annie46664 3 years ago
Word.
bobbygnosis 3 years ago
Bush has even texanized the term.. terrah
You could make a drinking game out of every time bush says terrah on his recent speech. It's a propaganda buzz word. People don't understand that it's such a huge world, everything under the sun happens, and they can mold public opinion merely by the direction of their cameras.
mutedmajority 3 years ago
This is great, David!!
Well done! ;O)
aftertruth 3 years ago 2
Gees you're boring and wrong again! 1 American death caused by terrorists IS a problem! (ever heard of planning?)
JudyandPaul 3 years ago
bush didnt even plant WMD in Iraq to cover his ass. I would have. seriously, If i had just masterminded some huge conspiracy to knock down the towers with hijackings so I could have a reason to do whatever in the world, I would have made sure we planted weapons on Iraq to keep credibility. thats CIA 101. bush didnt. because there was no conspiracy.
glennjridge 3 years ago
not a bad point. But the facts remain that 911 is highly anomalous and the evidence demand a better investigation
hypnotstcollector 3 years ago
i think the scrutiny of the devices by the UN would have been clear they were not iraqi. He'd be caught with his hand in the cookie jar.
benbramz 3 years ago
still, planting evidence is so common and easy even a small amount of anything should have been possible. The police do it all the time. the sheer volume of false allegations against Iraqi govt and Afgh' should have produced a UN outcry. not a peep, realy (dixie chicks?). so, thats also odd.
hypnotstcollector 3 years ago
so your suggesting Bush would have been too afraid to plant WMD in Iraq due to scrutiny, yet he would risk sending demolition teams and brainwashing multiple people into hi-jacking planes to knock down buildings and pentagon in his own country? do you guys ever think about what you believe?
glennjridge 3 years ago
Do you believe everything your told? Sure, things the hardcore conspiracy theorist say may be wrong - but the official conclusions seem a bit off. Do you not see that?
Im not asking you to change what you think - so there is no need to get so defensive..
benbramz 3 years ago
what are you telling me?...you are half for the conspiracy and half not? actually I do meet you half way.I believe our leaders were guilty of complacency. I believe its possible they got info this could happen and due to the audacity of the info they figured it wouldnt happen. that doesnt equal war criminal. it pretty much means they dropped the ball.but secret demolition teams?brainwashed pilots? not going to buy it ever.
glennjridge 3 years ago
If i say i'm a conspiracy theorist does that mean i naturally agree with all what is mentioned? No. I do believe elements, but i also think some of it is rubbish also. I never said "bush was to blame". Im not that stupid. I feel something went on, too many official "facts" dont add up and needs re-evaluation. Too many influential people have questioned the offical report. Im no idiot who take loose change as definitive proof. I dont have a theory, im not in a position to comment. (cont..)
benbramz 3 years ago
(..cont) It worries me that so many RELEVANT people discard the report. You seem bright, and not some gun ho youtube armchair know it all, so i'd hope to think you see why i think what i do.
benbramz 3 years ago
look, dont be vague.there are only 3 options. they themselves planned it(ie inside job)....they didnt plan it...or they were lax with our security out of complacency.
the facts add up more on the side of complacency then any idioctic idea they sent secret demolition tams and brainwashed pilots and hired mostly saudi pilots when they were trying to blame Iraq. cripes theres another headscratcher that dooms this conspiracy idea!
glennjridge 3 years ago
/watch?v=7Ng5qwtR59A
JLaw012 3 years ago
Just like on this video where you see that CLEARLY the building gave way, ZERO explosions are seen or heard.
/watch?v=-vng4QFwQaY&feature=email
JLaw012 3 years ago
Jlaw, its not hard to find falling blds. "Koyaniskwatsi", FF Coppola c. 1980 has a series of imploded blds (and Chemtrails, but i digress). All you have to do is remove the lower material out of the way from the whats above in a timely manner. It doesnt matter where you start. I recorded 911 out of Fresno Ca area and on one piece you do hear explosions. there is no shortage of witness' reporting multiple explosions. I have a "collapse" play list showing xlt close up of sequential explosions.
hypnotstcollector 3 years ago 2
Actually the wittneses you CT's about hearing explosions are taken out of context, which is a typical tactic you guys use. There were plenty of noises that day that were explosions, from falling debris to bodies to airplane etc... this does not mean it was demolitions, cameras would of clearly picked it up and evidence of explosives would be EVERYWHERE over the city.
JLaw012 3 years ago
Wrong terrorism is not a crime like a simple murder. its a TACTIC, used to frighten people out of their normal lifestyle. to say it is "minimal" is just sad and wrong. Bombings,Kidnappings and Hostage-Takings,Armed Attacks and Assassinations,Arsons and Firebombings,Hijackings and Skyjackings,robberies and extortion,Cyber Terror. After 9/11 the stock market shut down and we went into a recession. During the 90's we IGNORED 6 terror attacks and look where inaction got us. You are out of touch.
JLaw012 3 years ago
> its a TACTIC, used to frighten people out of their normal lifestyle ...
> During the 90's we IGNORED 6 terror attacks and look where inaction got us
Let me get this straight.
A. The purpose of terrorism is to create fear and hysteria.
B. I am out of touch because I am encouraging people not to be fearful and hysterical.
What are you really trying to say?
DavidSChandler 3 years ago
Why would you diminish and trivialize the damage this tactic called "terrorism" has had on people lives and economies around the world by calling it a "scam"?
You also say that you "don't believe there is a terrorism problem around the world"
Tell that to the families who had loved ones die in Madrid,England,Pakistan,Israel,families of 9/11. This tactic TARGETS innocent civilians and sit on your little elite high horse calling it a "Scam". No don't be hysterical about it, but it is reality.
JLaw012 3 years ago
> Why would you diminish and trivialize the damage this tactic called "terrorism" has had on people lives and economies around the world by calling it a "scam"?
Any time someone is killed, it is devastating for their loved ones. The difference between this "tactic" and murder is the government has jumped on this as a rationale to go to war and shred the Constitution. The scale of the violence doesn't justify this response, even on an international level, but especially in the US.
DavidSChandler 3 years ago
Rational? Umm yes the 9/11 attack, the Cole attack, the embassy attacks are an act of war, that groups like Al-Quada have chosen to take part in and have declared more attacks on the US and our allies. i can't think of a better reason to go to war in Afganistan and Rid the world of these sick radicals. Why don't you start blaming them for once instead of the "government" and speaking of the constitution the #1 job of the president is to protect its citizens, invading Afghanistan was necessary.
JLaw012 3 years ago
Pop. Mech? Show me any such statement by MIT, etc. No one wants to step into this. It is quiet. I am not an alex jones or D. Avery fan. I have read posts like yours before. allmost 'borg like. The media fed us live lies. And the bld's fell at 8 floors per sec. my 1959 500+hp Corvette did 12.8@113. w/ a good launch 11.8s.@120ish. WTC is faster than my vette. if you say it fell in 14-15 sec, thats still a 90+mph 1/4mile. weird.
hypnotstcollector 3 years ago
Yes, Popular Mechanics and MIT etc.. all have done investigations into the claims and facts surrounding 9/11. I have the links to these website for ANYONE who wants to see REAL experts instead of a little college boy with Mac who knows jack about structural engineering and demolitions.
JLaw012 3 years ago
By the way maybe you should take a good look at what a REAL demolition LOOKS and SOUNDS like.
/watch?v=7Ng5qwtR59A
JLaw012 3 years ago
Those stats are interesting, can you give me a link to it-I'd love to see it for myself. Should all the men and woman who have died in this useless war been included within those stats? Their deaths are a byproduct of 911, aren't they?
idolyzer 3 years ago
> Their deaths are a byproduct of 911, aren't they?
No. Iraq is not about 9/11. 9/11 is a false rationale for the Iraq war. The thousands of American deaths and the million+ Iraqi deaths are a direct consequence of Bush administration policy.
DavidSChandler 3 years ago
well said sir, this terrorism stuff is a big scam. they bother people at the airports now.
photofu 3 years ago
your work will be important in showing to the public how the wtc buildings faling were not pancakes! 10 pancakes per second is pancake batter. i am surprized at how many people in the SF Bay area with 'real' educations think (like i did untill 9-1-07) the "Nova"/"history channel" documentary version is accurate. I cant even get OLD friends to look at this. they get emotional.
hypnotstcollector 3 years ago
Give me a break, Not just the History channel disagrees with that absurd 9/11 conspiracy nonsense. So does MIT,Purdue U,Columbia U,American Scientific Mag,Pop Mechanics,Implosion world demolitions,American Society of Civil engineers,National Institute for Science and Technology Etc.. of course never mind the real experts when you have non experts like Dylan Avery or Alex Jones on your side making money off of selling their moronic theories to dopey kids or haters.
JLaw012 3 years ago
Dylan Avery and Alex Jones making money?
Well, tell me how much Larry Silverstein and Frank Lowy made out of insurance for WTC towers as well as those who bought put options days before 9/11.
aftertruth 3 years ago
Yes they make money off this..
As we write the insurance payments are not going to reach $7.1 billion. The current situation is $4.6 billion at a maximum, although this may be subject to change (up or down) as a result of court rulings.
And of course this isn't profit for Silverstein. The money is being provided for him to rebuild the WTC complex, and it turns out that's quite expensive ($6.3 billion in April 2006.
JLaw012 3 years ago
What about that Liberty Bonds? - Congress approved $8 billion in "Liberty Bonds"...If New York actually uses its 9/11 rebuilding money at Ground Zero, and Silverstein gets all the Liberty Bonds (with their low interest rate of about 6.5 percent), his future income from the towers would be worth $5.7 billion to $7.5 billion in today's dollars. At those values, the project is economical even if rents never rise to Midtown levels(end quote). Silverstein's no fool. He made/makes sure he gets more.
aftertruth 3 years ago
Hmmm, ok...for one thing around $4.6 billion in insurance money, $6.3 billion in costs to rebuild, Not such a great deal, then. Whats more, dont imagine the insurance companies have handed over all of this money. Secondly,you think Larry planned the attack with random dudes to fly planes into not only the two WTC's but also the pentagon and a random plane in the air over PA, So he could rebuild some buildings where the Two WTC's hoping that he would make "future money"? makes zero sense.
JLaw012 3 years ago
Hi JLaw012, Happy New Year!
Well, didn't I tell you that WTC was not popular anymore and they wanted to get rid of them. In order to do so properly, they had to remove all the asbestos etc toxic materials before destroying the towers but that would have cost a billion or two dollars. They saved a LOT there. Also, 9/11 is a combination of all kinds of crimes. But their ultimate goal was to start wars. Afghan, Iraq, never ending 'War on Terror'(fraud), and war on our freedom and rights!
aftertruth 3 years ago
Give me a break.
1. There is NOTHING in Afganistan it a baron desert.
2. Saddam had broken the cease fire agreement of 1992 which made it 100% legal for us to invade, not only that he broke 17 UN resolutions the last one being a "FINAL" resolutions with
"serious consequences" to befall if he broke it, which he did. He supported terrorists and had training camps in iraq, and he murdered over 500,000 of his own people. So we did not need to do some moronic attack on ourselves to do these things.
JLaw012 3 years ago
Change of the subject cause you couldn't deny what I wrote? Haven't you read "ONE HUNDRED FIFTH CONGRESS SECOND SESSION FEBRUARY 12, 1998"? Read what Mr. Malesca of Unocal told your lawmakers then. And you don't seem to know what happened on July 25, 1990 between then-US Ambassador to Iraq April Glaspie and President Saddam Hussein. Along with 'Kuwaiti refugee girl Naira's testimony' at the Congress. We were all lied to, mate. It's time to wake up! And who gave Saddam the weapon? THE U$A!!
aftertruth 3 years ago
Its not changing the subject you said some stupid unprovable claim about knocking down the towers on 9/11 so they would not have to pay for asbestos removal. That does not deserve an answer, its incorrect.
Who gave Saddam what weapon? he got weapons from all over the place is the owner of a Gun Store responsible for a murder if the murder uses the gun NO! Saddam is responsible for his own actions, we did not make him kill a half a million of his own people.
JLaw012 3 years ago
Well, you need to tell me how much it would have cost to remove all the toxins if they properly destroyed those buildings. Also,
U.S. Exports of Biological Materials to Iraq
The Senate Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs has oversight responsibility for the Export Administration Act. Pursuant to the Act, Committee staff contacted the U.S. Department of Commerce and requested information on the export of biological materials during the years prior to the Gulf War. (continued)
aftertruth 3 years ago
(2)After receiving this information, we contacted a principal supplier of these materials to determine what, if any, materials were exported to Iraq which might have contributed to an offensive or defensive biological warfare program. Records available from the supplier for the period from 1985 until the present show that during this time, pathogenic (meaning "disease producing"), toxigenic (meaning "poisonous"), and other biological research materials were exported to Iraq pursuant ...
aftertruth 3 years ago
(3)to application and licensing by the U.S. Department of Commerce. Records prior to 1985 were not available, according to the supplier.
(end) Your country provided those WMD to Saddam. I have a list of the weapons the US gave him that my friend in the US military sent me. That's what Saddam used on Kurds. And talking about figures, the US killed half a million children and babies via sanctions, and Madeleine Albright said, "We Think the Price Is Worth It." Seems that's fine with you, eh?
aftertruth 3 years ago
(4)Saddam already is being tried in the killings of more than 140 Shiites in a town north of Baghdad.(from AP article). If Saddam was to be executed(though I'm not sure if real Saddam really died or not), so is Albright. And Bush et al for killing more than 1.2million innocent Iraqis during this invasion which was based on lies such as 9/11. Oh, you ignore the story about April Glaspie and Naira, who turned out to be then Kuwaiti Ambassador's daughter! All Hill and Knowlton's job. Performance!
aftertruth 3 years ago