Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (209)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • This is a nice video......

    I just wonder why NASA does not develop

    a safe source of energy such as this one here and get rid of all these toxics from our life

    It is all described in the

    top magnetic generator

    search for it in Google

  • Is that you Rube Goldberg? Is this me?

  • Generateur discoide 24 V site Weeb discoide1451

  • can you expain to me what this is? is it just an induction motor? or what :)

    thanks

  • Here is my advice for you - there is a website that review the current

    magnetic generators in the market - Go To Google and search for

    "Top Magnetic Generator" click the first results and - Walla

    TopMagneticGenerator(dot)Com

  • @SurvivalGuide2012 "Walla" ?

    LOL ! Speak French much, moron?

  • This reminds me of that quack computer scientist in Charlie and the Chocolate Factory.

    "I am now telling the computer EXACTLY what it can do with a lifetime supply of chocolate!"

  • ah ?? what exactly are you trying to prove here.???

  • Oh, btw. I hear your motor speeding up, when you switch something it begins to slowing down. This is not free energy nor over unity device. Just stored mechanical energy in flywheel. That way you can get more energy out in short time, but total power is lost.

    That is how capacitor works: you charge it relative long time, while discharging may be so short that you get very high peak power out, but average power is the same or lower due to loses. This is still not over unity device. Sorry.

  • The only funny thing is option: "transcribe audio", and I got: "I hijacked school kids for current....". LOL :-)

  • EVERY TIME THAT THRES A PERPETUAL ENERGY PURPOSE THERE ARE TOO MANY HATERS

  • Btw for safety reasons one should ALWAYS TAKE OFF metal wristwatch, rings and jewelery when manipulating electric devices... duh.

  • The motor speeds up because the generator load is reduced through a reduction of cEMF and a reduction of the opposing magnetism in the excitation field. Well, of course it speeds up, you just reduced the torque required for the motor to turn the generator.... if you hook an external load to this thing, there will be no benefit. This rig speeds up when its only load is itself. There's no free power here. We simply see a speed increase in response to a torque decrease. Smoke and mirrors.

  • hey can you send me full details of this project as early as possible to my email id

  • There are still some things that are not fully understood, take the Michael Faraday paradox  (the magnet and disc experiments) Have fun!

  • i'll bet you get a better result if you were to use a starship rodin coil. and if you put the thing in a vacuum..

  • ___ w w w diymagneticmotor com has some serious PLAN

  • PCHT dot weebly dot com ..........check out that theory!

  • i think it would have been better to explain your setup and how everything is wired together first.

  • bullshit man.

  • if u are able to use electricity to run the bench grinder and create electricity to then run the bench grinder and have excess that is energy created. (Which is impossible) Why don't you put another coil and wheel on the other side of the bench grinder to be more efficient and make more electricity.

  • everything i have seen so far is a scam. Example: 12v motor spinning a 200v motor and getting 100v out of it and you get free energy.

  • Perhaps I'll test this theory and gather the equipment necessary for it as well. It would be easier to control then a magnet-driven design that came across my plate the other day. In fact, this particular method of energy generation would serve as a great benifit in the 100 Year Ship IRT from DARPA.

  • I can't really say that I'm so much interested in the scientific fact behind it (since the principles of its operation isn't really that terribly complicated) but I can certainly wonder about the possible scale that this could be reproduced at to power the average consumer-level home. Of course a method of cooling would have to come into play with the motor itself to stave of some of the friction. But as one coil pulls energy for the motor another could be set up for a UPS type system.

  • If free energy is possible then you are the biggest douche in the universe. Write a paper, try to work the sience behind it so others can replicate your work. And win a nobel prize in the procces ;).

    I rather live in a world where thermodynamics are true than in a world where it's false and we have people not sharing the answer to world hunger, war etc. The answer is energy.

  • you rule Thane !! i hope you are being well rewarded for releasing this stuff

  • The New And Improved Generator ( speed )

  • Comment removed

  • one can apparently get out more energy than put in. I think your demonstrations make this more clear than any others. Thanks. Perhaps electromagnetic fields have more dimensions to them than we realize? Or the 180 degrees is a mirror reflection that is like 2 mirrors endlessly reflecting back and forth. If this was the case one must stop the reflections to uncouple the back EMF from the EMF. Thanks

  • I think your demonstration is great. I have been trying to make sense of all of these over unity devices and have concluded that our understanding of electromagnetic fields is incomplete. It seems the power a field can generate when it is converted to mechanical energy does not necessarily lessen the energy contained in that field. The field goes through 2 90 degree changes mag-elec-mag and returns as back EMF that reflects the apparent load. If one can uncouple it or turn it another 180 deg..

    

  • Listening to all these people critcize this guy for at least trying i can see why we are still using fossile fuels. Everybody wants to pretend like they know it all and bash a guy for trying while they have no solutions what so ever an merely add on to the problem. Like an old professor wants said to me if you're not part of the solution you must be part of the problem. Boy was he so right. By the way it takes alot less energy to come up with negative comments then it is to actually do something

  • @2ndtonone1000 Well if we're trying to conserve energy then wouldn't making useless comments be the better option?

  • @M5000thesdgversion You mean like you just did? Seems like you probably need to follow your own advice and stop trying to be a smart ass.

  • Comment removed

  • @2ndtonone1000 Didn't you know they have added hateraid to the national water supply lol

  • got to love all the naysayers that come on here and diss this guy for at least trying. i don't agree with some things with your experiment but i do commend you for trying. Listening to all these other people i'd like to see if they have something better probably not because its easy to criticize others when you haven't put in the work or did anything other then quoting from a physics book that his idea is flawed. Then please by all means let me see you do better then.

  • thank you great idea

  • @007bond66 dont be such a tightas*, its an effort that worked

  • Fantastic. This is the information I have been looking for. Cancellation of Lenz law. Exciting, isn't it? Could you provide me with schematic? hope it is not intellectual property anything. Could air core wok in the same manner? What's the theoretical background of acceleration of high voltage coil? my email address is may7charlie@yahoo.ca Thanks again Charlie from Alberta (cold country)

  • if this is the case then a heavy roatating mass will add to the overall out dut.

  • thats generator !

  • hey there @ThaneCHeins, i've been watching these vid's and i noticed no one has added another lement in their models, "static electricity" if you added a simple baloon and whool winter hat you could boost your amps considerably. just an idea i had

  • Watching this idiot waste money on experiments and nonsense results that I can debunk with the knowledge obtained from a high school physics course makes me very sad. Is it just me, or are we dumbing down as a species?

  • @raycod84 No, it's just you :)

  • it's a great pity that 'so called' (or insinuated) university approved' experimenters don't even partake of the depth of education that was common in my youth!!!

    I agree with all the posts that state 'unsure measurements' and more in than out.

    However, the experimenters are apparently totally unaware of the effects of a shorted magnetic field, shame your shallow reseaerch. MaY I suggest that you start with the amplidyne circuit, and just visualise the similarities??? of course it will unload!!

  • He said flux, hehe hehe.

  • Sounds like your asking a bunch of questions

  • @peckiledorf It will (at half the voltage)

  • In one episode of The Simpsons Lisa invented a perpetual motion machine. Homer shouted "I'll teach you to break the laws of thermodynamics" and tried to strangle her.

  • 1 amp in 2 amps out WILL NEVER HAPPEN!

  • @peckiledorf if you really think so take that same design and now add another more copper coil on the opposite side front and back.

  • @Lrure yea yea yea

  • perpetual motion machines which consist of magnets do not have to break any laws of physics or create energy out of nothing.

    alot of energy is stored in the form on magnetism. That has not been created from nothing!

  • I'll believe this when you get a BRITISH patent on it. (they take a rather dim view of perpetual motion and free energy machines and you'll probably be shown the door) As to the poster who called me a "dickhead" (bad manners) what qualifications have you got? As to the voltmeter results I'd bet a pound to a Zimbabwe dollar that misleading results are occurring because of "wattless power". (a lot of volt-amperes being produced does NOT mean that real power is available)

  • @techdavey1000 a first year electronics student knows that a resistive load means the phase angle between the voltage and current is zero, which means the power equals volts time amps. What part of basic electricity do you not understand ?

  • @fgleich Look dude, I passed my exams over 40 years ago. In those days real power (as opposed to imaginary) was V x I x cos phi (cos phi is the power factor which is unity for a pure resistance) Here is a trick you can play. Make up a resonant circuit and use a voltmeter and ammeter across either the coil or capacitor. You will get lots of volts and lots of amps BUT you won't have a lot of power, certainly not V x I because V & I are NOT IN PHASE. Now which part of this do YOU not understand?

  • @techdavey1000 If you'd have read my post, you'd have noticed I said the phase angle in a resistive load is zero, and what he had in the transformer experiment is a resistive load. The power in a resistive load is volts times amps. You need to go back and read before making your post dude.

  • wow. your transfered electrical energy into mechanical energy back into electrical energy AND you lost energy due to friction in the process

  • now add another element in this model, on the spinner cover it with rubber and on the wire coil put a piece of whool cloth, see how much more power u make. and let me know!

  • ha i can make any ammount of power from ,,nothing,, :) ...

  • Why are you wasting your time on this, and encouraging other to waste their time and resources. It is a very well understood field and you discover nothing, so don't bother posting this pointless mechanics as if you have achieved anything.

  • Comment removed

  • Se ci mettevi qualche spira in più avevi una tensione più alta.

  • @Sparviero17 scusa ma secondo te sti qua ci capiscono qlcs se gli scivi in italiano?

  • Comment removed

  • hi. amateur physicist in a levels. question: what energy efficiency does your device have? anything above 100 percent if you were to define your system so it is closed would violate the first law of thermodynamics. also, lenzs law is well supported by maxwells equations. to violate one would be to violate the other. i am extremely interested in your work and would be grateful for a blueprint or diagram outlining the apparatus.

  • so where does the extra energy come from? i mean, on the subatomic level... i'm not trying to say it's not possible or anything, im just genuinly intrested about where the increase of energy comes from?

  • have you thought about using a vacuum?

  • ya ya right. Free energy. Show me your electric bill.

  • @ThaneCHeins Actually, it's "you're".

  • I want my 5:29 back please

  • thank you for your work and keep it up

  • It saddens me to see all these "free energy" or perpetual motion machine demonstrations and I have to question the defective education systems that allow so many people to be tricked by charlatans. With the exception of nuclear reactions the scientific facts are that ENERGY CANNOT BE CREATED OR DESTROYED it merely changes from one form to another. How many people have been scammed I wonder and how much money have they lost? As to the "power" wattless power perhaps? Cos phi not unity?

  • Dear techdavey1000, A scientific "fact" is merely a reference point for our current level of understanding just as it was a scientific fact that, "the Earth was the center of the universe" and "that it was also flat", and "only wooden boats could float" and "only birds could fly" etc, In addition it took energy for you to think and type those thoughts and at some point that energy had to be CREATED.If you were to compare how much we know vs how much there is yet to learn - we know nothing. T

  • @ThaneCHeins

    I agree with the fact we know nothing in comparison to what there is to kow but to say the energy u use to think is 'created' is utter non-sense... wat do u think u eat food for? :S

  • @ThaneCHeins

    "In addition it took energy for you to think and type those thoughts and at some point that energy had to be CREATED"

    -False, no energy aws created for that, the energy used to type those words comes for chemical energy from the food you eat.

    "With the exception of nuclear reactions "

    -false, nuclear energy is no exeption to that at all. In nuclear fission (i.e. the nuclear power plants we have today) the energy comes from transforming mass to energy. Remeber E = mc^2

  • @ThaneCHeins So true, tumbs up for that. To days Over Unity test in my lab show a clear output of 214,731 Watt while input was 26 Watt. Double shecked the killawatt meter with 4 otter meeters so input is correct. Output was also shecked many times with warious instruments while load was a lightbulb. The reason this is so has to do with that I have found a "sweet spot" in the magnetic field that is bypassing Lens Law. I can generate el without lens effect due to that and spesical alloys.

  • @ThaneCHeins Hell Yeah. I love the way you think dude. No homo. (not that there is anything wrong with being gay. to each their own.)

  • @ThaneCHeins Nice and very well thought out answer. Mr Techdavey1000 is, using common not so scientific vernacular, a dick head. This is also a fact. Not evidenced by any appendages sprouting from his head, but simply by his retort. There is an old saying: A little knowledge is dangerous. What was the final upshot of this video? the input was coming from where? from the generator or from a mains power source? and what was the input to output final ratio? I'm just curious. Thanks in advance.
  • @ThaneCHeins Right...and we know enough now. Over unity is in the EXACT SAME CATEGORY as the myths you listed. We've been over it. We know that the Earth is not the center of the universe. We know that metal boats can float. And we know that over unity is not going to happen. Thankfully you have only slapped some magnets on a bench grinder, but I see otherwise intelligent people putting huge amounts of effort into a complete dead end. It's a pity...they could help us figure out real alternates.

  • Comment removed

  • @ThaneCHeins One problem, you use wire, which has resistance therefore the idea of 100% efficiency is out the window even if you had a generator/alternator and a motor that was100% efficient they would eventually stop turning. Another idea here, friction, does the motor have bearings/bushings, I would hope so, their you go losing your efficiency again. I'm all for free energy but I don't think this is the way to do it.

  • @ThaneCHeins The energy created for him to think and type his thought as well as mine yours and others comes from the sun. Sun provides energy for plants which other animals eat. We eat the plants and the other animals gaining the energy from the sun allowing us to live. all you are doing is transferring energy eventually this machine would degrade or cease to work however, if it lasts a long time then that's not a big issue now is it. The energy is still coming from somewhere.

  • @ThaneCHeins Today the scientists are measuring the diameter of an electron, they are calculating

    spectrum of a planet many many light years from us, putting intelligent robots in mars, etc.etc.

    and you are claiming you found something they don't know? or they haven't even scratched it yet

    No my friend, it will never happen, wake up and touch the reality

  • @ThaneCHeins Even if we grant you your wish, and reserve the strong definition of fact for concepts within an abstract, mathematical framework, you cannot avoid the evidence that has been accumulated for centuries now regarding conservation of energy. At our scale, there has not been a single experiment which demonstrated a deficiency in the theoretical framework of the current standard model - which precludes results such as those you present here.

  • @ThaneCHeins HE's not talking about a fact, he's talking about a LAW. In a world without friction you could have a perpetual motion machine that was 100% efficient but in order to have free energy it would have to create more energy than is put into it, this is impossible. What you need to realize is this kind of "free energy" is as rudimentary impossible as combining two chemicals in a reaction and ending up with more matter than you started with. Your argument is disingenuous and simplistic.

  • @ThaneCHeins The energy wasn't created. It's transferred from the kinetic energy of his muscles, which came from respiration, using the energy of the his blood glucose. The glucose came from the food he ate. The food he ate could have been from a growing plant: which absorbs light energy from the sun. The Sun's heat and light energy comes from the nuclear fusion that occurs in it's centre. Mass is a different manifestation of energy btw. All of this is theory but it is tried, tested and just.

  • @ThaneCHeins You do realize that's why people... eat... right? Chemical energy stored in the molecular bonds of the food is used for all bodily functions, including thinking. It's not created, it's converted from the energy stored in the food (look it up, that's why we breathe, we need oxygen to "extract" the chemical energy of the food through a chemical process called oxidation).

  • @ThaneCHeins creo que el nombre del aparato es engañoso. Es cierto que no exsisten caminos cerrados en la ciencia pero se pueden hacer conjeturas bastante sensatas sobretodo en el campo de lo macro .

    A mi me dio a entender el nombre que se intentaba crear una maquina de movimiento perpetuo pero es evidente que se le esta injectando energia de alguna fuente al circuito y que el video no muestra suficiente como para suponer que lo que este sucediendo es autosostenible.

  • @ThaneCHeins You're right, energy was created by him typing that. All energy was created at the beginning of the Universe. In this case, the energy was stored in a piece of bread that he then ate and which his body converted to electricity which then converted to kinetic energy releasing it as heat with each muscle movement and keystroke which then dissipated into the atmosphere for use again by the Universe. But more energy was never put out than was put in.

  • @ThaneCHeins those were very old assumptions not based on science. The 'world was flat' was based on peoples opinion that they couldn't see over the horizon. the boats was due to fact they didn't know about different hull shapes. Energy cannot be created, unless your splitting atoms as energy is mass. So that is the only way to create it. Here your not splitting atoms, so your only losing energy as heat and sound. Regardless of your results, if you did make energy, the gov would 'silence' you.

  • @ThaneCHeins

    okay, so i translate your arguing:

    So according to you, actualy it is easily possible that the earth is the centre of the universe and it is indeed flat. Or banana shaped. It is just the current level of understanding of the universe makes us think it is an oblate spheroid. A few yeas later it may be proved false.

  • You are so rong!

    2 words

    casimir effect

  • @techdavey1000 you need to start questioning the facts given you through schooling, a lot of them are wrong. For instance, university teaches that michelson-morley's experiment had null results ( supposedly showing that light's velocity was constant in all frames of reference ), but the actual experiment's notes say something different. Another researcher, Dayton Miller, showed that his experiments gave increasing interference with increasing altitude, showing light's velocity is NOT constant

  • @techdavey1000 yes but even in nuclear reactions there is no energy created! bonding energy between parts of the atoms due to differences in current are transformed into kinetik and then with the help of technology into thermic!

    But still ur fully right: you can create "free energy", even the name for that is wrong...

  • @techdavey1000

    even nuclear reactions doesn't create energy, you just

    set it free with fission, by splitting atoms or with fusion,

    by converting mass to energy.

    Overunity is a scam, none of these so called inventors

    using there own devices, they just selling it.

    You can't free energy unless you steal it!

  • @techdavey1000

    Well done, A very scientific and realistic answer.

  • @techdavey1000 nuclear reaction doesnt destroy energy it just changes it into a new form and thats heat.

    In other words energy is always there just changes forms.

  • @techdavey1000 no one said this energy came from nothing. it may come from an as yet undetermined source and/or path. free energy doesn't have to mean it comes from nothing, it could mean that we humans do not have to account for its generation by the loss of other resources that we need. free energy may end up being nothing more than an existing flow that we haven't yet tapped into. in the grand scheme of things, the universe is infinite. so would be energy.

  • @techdavey1000 You are 100% correct. You must have taken the same physics courses that I did. However, no one can explain why permanent magnets don't "wear out". The field remains constant no mater how many times you pass a field coil thru the magnetic field. There is something here that needs explaination and further research. Besides, it's FUN.

  • @cochise7979

    Why is that so magis that magnets don't "wear out".

    Gravitation is why does' not wear out?

    Actualy we know nothing about where all these forces and matters came from and why and how, and we never will. period.

    But we understand and see how these stuffs work, and what are they doing, what properites they have.

    That's why we can utilize them.

  • all i want to know is .... can the output be converted into a death ray?

  • @ckickenhead Well you would need a lot more power than the Perpetia machine makes! I heard a story about the British Star Wars. (the US were spending zillions, Brit budget was $45,000) Old radar stuff was tandemd up into a dish. Waveguides were pumped up with inert gas to stop arcing. Guzzled terrific power but dead ready cooked birds would drop out of the sky! When the beam was lowered it blew up a dynamite store 5 miles away. It ought to be used on the Taleban.

  • Thank you for your work.

  • @ThaneCHeins it's; you're

  • wow...shit looks like not works...but...A ryobi motor looks tight.

  • Very cool. Thank you for uploading this. Gotta love the potential electron.

  • sooooooooooooo Ottawa U is the place to go to school after i get my Associates?

  • you people who say the laws of.... suck. you are defeated without even trying. I think they should not teach laws of peoples past thinking. and forge your owne. thanks Heins and cheers to you . if you ever build this use cap. or supercaps because there is alot of wasted energy because you can't force power into a battery it will only flow slowly into the battery.

  • @MrJetjoe What do you mean, "you people" ? lol. always wanted to say that. I hear there are new lithiums that CAN be force charged in 4 min.

  • Comment removed

  • You need to be extremely careful with the measurements, the power factors of many of these components will be far from unity. Also AC measurement accuracy of most digital multimeters assumes a sine wave of a limited frequency range. I am glad to see people do these experiments but you have to be very careful to not delude yourself as to what is happening.

  • Hello, Your HC coil leads are placed wrong. You need to move the black lead over one to the left to get a proper current reading and the current needs to go thru the meeter and not have the meter just across the circuit..thanks.

  • I believe nine is meant since nine and the nine enthusiasm that never dies to succeed.

    Cheers

    Magnets are the one magic that we never grow out of.

    So much safer than playing with Mercury, like I did in the fifties. That was a special laboratory as a kid.

  • If a laser pointer was used as items in the background are mentioned pointed at, it would be a little easier to follow along. Maybe watched a few times more is necessary.

    The magnetic loaded wheel looks well balanced.

    I have to admit, it's exciting being mad scientist.

    Even when your nine.

  • wHAT WOULD IT TAKE TO put a FLYWHEEL on this. To use the coil on a pulse of a 3 minute cycle for example, using KINETIC energy AND THE FLYWHEEL for 3 minutes free energy. This until the next pulse hits it etc. What would the data show then in comparison to continual usage. I think comparisons of these two methods would be important to those of us on the same idea of magnets and EMF coils.

  • @Philscbx it sounds like it's all over the place

  • good job Thane, i can see that you negated lenz's law .how much current can you flow and keep negating lenz's law? the educated in this world use to adamantly declare our planet was the center ,that it was flat,and today that the planet is not perpetually moving at this time.because of the notion of conservation of energy. I think you dicovered a big piece of the puzzle.

  • a Real energy free engine will not require any power at all to start. So its a childs experiment with magnets, nothing new. By the way this is called electromagnetism, basic physics :)

  • No load acceleration is easy its just the world of confusing motor EM dynamics thats making everyone including the inventor confused.

    If it really does generate free energy then you should just hook it up to a thermal load dump to get the output energy which should be infinite and then it should cause the load dump to explode if your device works correctly.

  • Visit freemicrosoftpoint[DOT]com

  • why does it accelerate?

  • It seems to me that the power required to power the motor is a lot more than the out put it's producing.Along with that we are not all university professors and have a university workshop at our disposal.If you really want people to produce some of their own energy a simplified set up and exspination, and less over technical jargon would go a long way.

  • Just to note he is not affiliated with the university in any way.

  • Dude you rock! Nice to see a inventor at work.

  • Dude you rock! Nice to see a crackpot at work.

  • Oh no. Please my comment was a compliment.  Why do you wish to argue? And why reply to my comment. Its the most generic one? Looking conversation? I would love to debate some of the latteral fundamentals here if you have the time.

  • Negative people always see negativity and are good for nothing. Positive people keep going and pick up the pieces.  Quote from a smart man. Not me.

  • Please send me the plans to make, along with plans for attaching wings making entire apparatus capable of powered manned flight, once complete i will subscribe to your channel, thank you in advance

  • I thought a single coil was single phase which makes v12 dc power only? or am I wrong?

  • I guess what they mean when they say free energy is that after it's build it pays for itself in the long run and you will soon be ready to live off the grid. No more payments to your electric company.

  • hey is it the coil touches the magnet then produce electricity?how do u wind the coil.i'm working on a prototype of magnetic generator.

    if u want to know more or can give me some useful info u can type back t me.

  • You should take this to the Dragon's Den. I'm sure those guys would give you a million for 50% of the company to continue to refine this. You also need to hook it up to a computer and some sort of input device that would read the position of the magnets and change the phase on the coil according to the speed of the rotor. Also some sort of mechanism to give the rotor it's initial push instead of using your hands.

  • @xrdeem

    I like the idea of sensors seeing all to alter settings.

  • can you show the circuit>????????????????

  • There's exactly one interesting test / demonstration for any free energy machine: remove all incoming sources of power and let it run, under load, for a couple of weeks. Until you can do that, it's safe to assume that any apparent free energy generated is an illusion.

  • He never said he has made a free energy machine! Maybe you should watch this again and this time listen!

  • Face it its just a bunch of motors that does nothing.

  • @jhuger Orbo?

  • @MrMichael33904 Orbo!

    (I have no idea what you're talking about)

  • @jhuger Orbo technology is controversial - science tells us that energy can not be created - yet Orbo does this. Orbo is an over unity technology - it provides more energy out than is put in. search term = Orbo

  • @MrMichael33904 Just another permanent magnet based scam

  • Just to silence critics. What if his goal is over unity but instead finds that he can come closer to just unity? Efficiency is still a good by product is it not? You do not need to be a physicist to apply an idea. None of Americas celebrated inventors were of the caliber of todays yet they did their thing. Negative people always see negativity and are good for nothing. Positive people keep going and pick up the pieces.

  • 100% efficiency would be wonderfully welcome.

    The bitterness comes from the prevalence of 'investor seekers' that prey upon the fervor generated by these claims of over-unity power generation.

    There is the overall annoyance factor of suck claims to those of use that have a basic understanding of thermodynamics.

  • @mcskifter i agree. what you give is what you get would be wonderful. and more than enough.

  • @dmgcat over unity is impossible, unity is theoretical

  • I didn't even watch this: but there is free energy. It just depends on your definition of free. Then you need to look at WHY Tesla had every penny pulled from his, TeslaMagnifingTransmiter project, by JPMorgan.

    Then you need to ask yourself why everyone who has come close too but dies mysteriously, or has their funds pulled from them right before they have a chance to prove it publicly!!!!!!!

  • Sarcasm detection FAIL

  • Take some actual courses in Physics.

  • the most famous scientific equation- E=mc^2. Conservation of mass and energy, since (as you most adeptly explained) mass and energy are interchangeable. The source for the energy in a solar panel is the SUN. And yes, for the record, I am in the dark ages (I don't even use computers or take physics lessons)

  • Perpetual motion produces more energy in the form of work than is supplied to it. Solar panels do not do this, they convert the sun's energy into electrical potential. I don't know if perpetual motion is possible, but solar panels are not an example of such a device.