Well he is only human, I remember hearing that his mothers side of the family suffer from heart disease problems and he has alot of his mother in him(genetically speaking).
I have jus had 5 stents inserted into TWO main coronary arteries...except they didnt TELL me they used 5. they wrote four..but i had to had the stents looked at and the surgeon in the ER said--...the legal limit per artery is TWO stents--theu used THREE in one artery and forged the paperwork. extra stent may cause my artery it to tear and I wil l die instantly ...Sir Paul--Who is yout Surgeon , I need a lawyer and a NEW surgeon.
@majorgeeek your argument is invalid. please try again, dipshit.
he is a genius. READ about him. like, seriously, you really don't know enough to make a valid argument. you haven't been making a valid argument this entire time, and the reason I am insulting is because you deserve the insults. you're just a little fucker, you know that? please shut up... oh, and I have slight OCD... I have to reply -.- oh, and you really don't know what gtfaysb means, do you?
@majorgeeek you sir, have FAILED. Paul is a genius. If you can't see that, then you're dumber than I thought... which is kinda impossible... but you have proven it not to be. seriously, have you EVER read about him... like, his full history? I don't think you have, and you should.
@majorgeeek -hangs head- it doesn't need to say "by the way, Paul McCartney is a genius" but how he grew up and how he became what he is today and everything in between does prove that he has genius. seriously, you are LOSING give it up, everyone is against you! so shut the fuck up, i am tired of your fucking shit. du bist ein großer scheißen Kopf
@majorgeeek FYI, I'm Jewish, so talking about Nazis or any of that shit is extremely insulting. Paul is a genius. dude, STFU. seriously. please. no one likes you. if you don't comment, I don't respond, got it? please, do everyone a favor, and shut your trap because no one wants to hear your bullshit.
@emmaexplosions saying Paul is a genius does not make him a genius - heck he can't even read music so he's a pretty dinb sort of genius??? - I note being Jewish hasn't stopped you from behaving like a foul mouthed Nazis
@majorgeeek no, see, my great-grandparents were fresh off the boat Austrian and a lot of my family was killed in the holocaust. I know holocaust survivors, and I don't like the word "nazi" outside of school. it's quite insulting to someone with my connections. and if you keep saying what you did, that's like being racist actually when I told you that it's very insulting. now, unless you want to be a racist bastard, i suggest you shut your asshole mouth, and quit talking to me.
@majorgeeek Paul is a fucking genius. END OF STORY. please don't reply to this. I am really fucking annoyed. and the fact that he can't read music actually makes him more of a genius. I agree with garethb1961, you really haven't read enough about Mozart or Paul to make a valid opinion on this. seriously, shut up. please. I really can't take it anymore.
@emmaexplosions sounds like you forgot your medication - Mozart sets the genius benchmark - you cannot have a discussion about music genius without Mozart - in this respect Paul is irrelevant - a bit like your opinions
@majorgeeek uh, dude, you really don't get it. Paul actually is a genius. Mozart was good too, but Paul is a genius as well. READ ABOUT THEM. god damn it. Oh, and btw, I'm actually very pissed right now, so shut the fuck up you fucking dipshit. please do us all a favor and go away.
@emmaexplosions what is there to get??? the onus is on YOU to prove he is a genius because there is practically no evidence to suggest Paul McCartney is a genius - either put up or shut up
@majorgeeek shut up yourself. I HAVE proved that Paul's a genius, you're just too stubborn to accept that. seriously, if I see that you commented ONE more time, i will kill myself because I am fed up with your fucking shit.
@majorgeeek uh, no, dude, look at ALL the facts that i have put. that makes him a genius. he has done so many things and is able to do so many things, only a music genius could do all that. you are obviously a dipshit who does not have any friends. you are too stubborn to accept the fact that Paul is a music genius. GET OVER IT, YOU'RE NOT WINNING. he is a genius.
@majorgeeek now, if you've been trying to say that it is your OPINION that he isn't a genius, then you are an idiot for not stating that from the beginning. we wouldn't be fighting if you had said it was your OPINION. everything you've been saying is like you've been trying to get me to believe it is FACT.
is it your OPINION or do you believe it's FACT? please tell me.
@emmaexplosions it is a fact that Paul is a successful musician but has not reached intellectual pinnacle of a music genius - it is also a fact you are a full-blown fuckwit
@majorgeeek don't be insulting yourself. see, you were acting like it was fact, not opinion, dipshit. you should have said early on that it was opinion. you are the fuckwit here, i am not. an i am tired of fucking fighting with you because you are one of the most stubborn idiots i've ever known. telling a ginormous (yes, I know ginormous isn't a real word -.-) Beatles fan that Paul is not a genius is one of the dumbest things ever. you cannot tell us otherwise. you. are. a. MORON. fuck off
@majorgeeek there you go again you just can't stop being a fuckwit - why just Paul??? why not call Clapton a genius, and Stevie Wonder, Ringo Starr, - If you call Paul a genius then you might as well call anyone a genius - where's your evidence??????????
@majorgeeek are you fucking serious? you clearly have no idea of the bass guitar or MUSIC for that matter if you seriously believe what you just said... you should be smashed into pieces by one of macca's bass guitars for this grave, insolent crime!
@rajbeast if you are trying to show Paul is a genius then you have failed - why is it so important to make him a genius?? he clearly is not a music genius - he is a very successful and popular musician/writer but he has not reached the highest intellectual level of achievement - in fact he cannot even read music
back to the issue - Paul McCartney is a solid successful musician/writer however he is not a music genius - in fact Lennon is closer to derserving that honour
back to the issue - Paul McCartney is a solid successful musician/writer however he is not a music genius - in fact Lennon is closer to derserving that honour
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
nthier are you for real??? genius relates to highest level of human musical achievement perhaps Mozart or Beethoven - if you think Paul is in that category then you are an idiot
aRe YoU sErIOus majorgeeek? goddam. Mozart and Beethoven is fine, but I seriously doubt they could have written pop-rock as well as lennon/mccartney. Get off the classical high horse and realize their is other great music. Miles Davis and Lee Morgan are also easily on the genius list.
@nthier no - rock is too limited a medium to define a genius - genius level represents the very highest level of human intellectual achievement eg the genius of Mozart, Beethoven - Paul may be great but he is not up to their standard and it helps if you can read music
@majorgeeek the fact that he can't read music makes him even MORE of a genius! He can play SO damn well and remember EVERY note without ever having to write it down. I think that takes true genius to be able to do that. Now stop being so uptight with Mozart and Beethoven. take it from a cellist who plays that Beethoven and Mozart in orchestra. PAUL IS A FUCKING GENIUS.
@majorgeeek OI! I'm a freaking cellist, so freaking take it from me!! it really takes true genius to remember all those chords!! seriously, you're not gonna win. he can remember EVERY SONG that he's EVER WRITTEN and play them perfectly without writing it down! How can someone who's NOT a genius do that? oh, and read up on him... his childhood, his music career, he is a genius. end of story!!!!
@majorgeeek really? because your definition of "genius" was high intellect... I don't think they had good education back in the time of Beethoven or Mozart -.- dude, cut the crap, he's a genius and you know it. end of story!! you really are a geek. now look, I told you before, I am a cellist, and I have played Mozart, and Bach, and Beethoven, and all that other stuff, but I have also played Beatles songs. HE'S A FREAKING GENIUS! Have you ever HEARD Blackbird? OH MY GOD, IT'S BEAUTIFUL!!
@emmaexplosions you sound more like a freakin idiot - and Paul is no genius because he hasn't reached the highest levels of human achievement - in a world of geniuses Paul is average
@majorgeeek hey, guess what Paul did? he wrote stuff for orchestra =) Classical stuff. you're a freaking idiot. did you know that you're losing this battle because you have no friends and everyone here hates you? geez. you really don't get it, do you? you see, you obviously don't know everything about Paul because you're too stubborn to learn. I'm probably smarter than you... scratch that, I AM smarter than you XDD
@emmaexplosions what's with all the insults and battle stuff??? Paul wrote classical stuff with the help of a computer since he cannot read music - in any case it was a massive flop - it is a wonder your "probably smarter" brain can generate enough power to use a keyboard
@majorgeeek wow, you're a moron. Paul composed so many fucking songs that no bloody artist could be him at that, Paul can basically play every instrument known to man, he was in 2 successful bands and is 68 but still rocking out like a 20 year old! He is very wise and smart! He is clearly the genius..of all geniuses
BTW, he also went into the Guinness world record book as the MOST successful musician.
It's a wonder how you can even read... I'm really starting to wonder how you're fighting me..
@emmaexplosions playing multiple instruments, being in successful bands and 68 and still rocking, wise and smart and the rest of it are not definitions of genius - put simply so that even a retrograde like you can understand - Paul has not reached the highest intellectual level of achievement and creativity to be called a genius - compared to Mozart Paul's music ability is on par with a worm - the fact that he appeals to morons like you works against him too
@majorgeeek oh, so you're talking about intellect? we have a better education now than they did back in the time of Mozart, dipshit. do you understand you are LOSING? geez. if you don't like Paul, just say so. don't be insulting him... you are the moron here... and how many times do I have to tell you that I AM A CELLIST. what instrument do you play? he is extremely creative too, so what the hell are you talking about? the fact that you are trying to win against Paul fans is completely idotic.
@emmaexplosions no you were wrong before and you are wrong now - not surprising you resort to insults since you have nothing intelligent to say - I am not insulting Paul - he is an excellent performer and I like his music however he is not a music genius - there is nothing wrong with that - if you call him a genius then you might as well call anyone a genius
@majorgeeek actually, you ARE insulting him, and I'm going through something really rough in my life, so would you shut up and accept the fact that you are actually wrong!? he IS a genius. END OF STORY, moron. to be able to do the things that he does is true genius. so fuck off and shut up because everyone here is tired of your shit. gtfaysb. try to figure that out, and if you can't, you're a fucking loser and an idiot. leave me the fuck alone!!!!
@majorgeeek Paul McCartney got an award from the President, performed for the president, been in 2 successful bands and has his own career, is still performing and going on tours, So just fuck off :] Paul can kick your ass
@majorgeeek "Gee" are you an idiot? Oh why yes you are, fuck off, no one cares about your whiny ass little problems, go fuck yourself and listen to the gay ass screeching noises that you call "music" Paul McCartney can kick your ass.
Paul is incredibly talented. That's why he doesn't need to learn to read music - a very basic one.
Find me someone who could play such so many instruments, composed/performed such so many timeless songs - without ability of reading any piece of music?
In fact, it just makes him unique. There will be no second like Paul - in the World of Geniuses or whatever.
@Cigaraholic it is obvious you are very fond of Paul McC however you offer not one shred of realistc evidence that Paul is a music genius - why? because there is no eveidence - the world is filled with unique musicians which are not even close to music genius
@Cigaraholic Paul McCartney is not a music genius because he has not reached the highest intellectual achievement and creativity of a genius - it seems obvious you ignore the fact that popularity is not a measure of genius
@Cigaraholic sure - it's common knowledge Paul's solo career never came close to the former fame of Beatles - most of his hits were all co-written - he may be popular but then so too are many other musicians who even better than he - ergo Paul is not a music genius
Paul solo career was not as good as The Beatles era, but still in the TOP of everything. You expect a legendary man can beat a legendary band, which was made by himsel also? You're nut.
Well well well, even God can be hated by someone like you I see.
This WORLD know Paul is one of the greatest legend, musician, singer ever, so only a moron who want to downgrade him? Who cares.
@kitty9tales He wouldn't consume gelatin because that is derived from animals.
No, he probably was lacking in omega 3 if he didn't eat fish and consuming too much omega 6 which is found in vegetable oils. The normal balance is 1 to 1 for optimum heart health.
back to the issue - Paul McCartney is a solid successful musician/writer however he is not a music genius - in fact Lennon is closer to derserving that honour
I would think just the opposite. Being Paul McCartney n not being able to read music makes u more impressive, n therefore a genius in my book. Think about it...
But instead of learning how to read music, he became the writer/composer of more hits than probably any other musical artist of the 20th century, or any your favorite Classical artists (or John). So in his case, clearly, being brilliant has been a breeze.
the Beatles was not only Paul - most of early hits were co written Lennon & McCartney - his later hits never reached the Beatles brilliance which proves Paul is not brilliant
The Beatles set the bar for pop/music acts of the 20th century. No act, individual or otherwise, has had such an impact (including the individual members of the group themselves). Now, if you personally don't like Paul's extensive catalog in the 40 years since the band broke up, and you feel Paul's lost it since his Beatles' days, that's a totally subjective thing. In other words, YOU think Paul hasn't been brilliant as a solo artist. That doesn't mean Paul is not a brilliant artist/music genius
The facts- he's one half of the core singing/songwriting team of the greatest pop/rock band of all-time, he's listed as the most successful musician/composer in pop music history by Guinness, his body of work spans over 50 years with contributions in virtually all areas of music, and he's composed tons and tons of hits as a Beatle and a solo artist- are overwhelmingly in favor of the brilliant genius argument.
Agreed. Talent is a measure of genius. And, insomuch as Paul's knack for song composition, natural gift for creating memorable melodies, harmonizing skills, and multi-instrumental acumen have guided his 50-plus year music career- one which has left us with oodles and oodles of classic songs/brilliant melodies- Paul's talent is special. He's one of the greatest muscians/composers of all-time because that's what our ears have always told us...
The problem with your argument is that, according to you, Paul McCartney becomes a genius if/when he learns how to read music (which is something I'm sure he could do anyway, if he tried). You also seem to feel that Mozart was somehow better than Paul. I'm not sure why you think this. Paul has written more music than Mozart... you're taking a completely subjective approach. You say "Paul isn't as good as he was as a Beatle." I could just as easily retort "Wolfgang wasn't great until his 30's."
@Christien23 your logic is backward - Paul doea not even come close to the benchmark of music genius - its up to you to prove his genius which you cannot because he is not a genius
"It's up to you to prove his genius which you cannot beccause he is not a genius." OK, I just looked up the word genius in my Concise Dictionary and found these definitions: "An exceptional natural capacity of intellect"; "A person having such capacity"; "Natural ability or talent." Note the words "Natural" and Talent", geek. As in, Paul is a naturally gifted songwriter/musician- one who never learned how to play music. This is what I've been saying. How do u not understand this?
@Christien23 mayor greek is right, he is no genius he did write good music and so did lennon but non of them are "GENIUS" although lennon kicks most ass
You really haven't paid attention if you think he hasn't achived periods post Beatles of great success- His Wings period was phenomenally successful - had more top 40 hits than any other artist in the 70's, Band On The Run was voted album of the year by Rolling Stone in 1974 Mull Of Kyntyre is still the biggest non charity single in the UK and in his first Wings tours, he played NO Beatle tunes- Comparing artists is odious as Lennon once said and comparing him to Mozart is unfair - just enjoy
So not being sarcastic here- define genius...For Me, he is one, Lennon, Dylan, Marley, Hendrix perhaps Miles Davis as far as the modern error- his innovations with the Beatles and his gift for melody give him strong consideration-His repuattion might not stand along with the great masters of classical music but his melodies will be heard just as theres are...
the word genius is not correct to descibe Paul. Genius ability ranks as the HIGHEST mental ability/ achievement possible - although Paul is good achieving genius ranking is still a greasy pole for him
The Beatles was not only just Paul McCartney - nearly all their songs written by Lennon and McCartney - Paul never came even close to the former fame of the Beatles and is struggling to make the best top fifty
Fuck this gay show! This show is becoming a problem to Paul McCartney. You people are really beginning to piss me off! You're a disgrace, Showbiz! You're making up rumors about Paul McCartney that aren't true, and that's also upsetting him. You bitches need to get a life and leave Paul alone. How 'bout talk shit about Britney Spears or The Jonas Brothers? Those people fit in your 'gay category', you stupid ignorant fucks!
Well, I'm older than a lot of you, or the whole lot of you, judging from the way you write. Pop music began when they started selling sheet music at the turn of the century. Put the Beatles in perspective. They changed the course of pop music in a few short years. Name a writer/performer before or after them with as much impact. Anyone can get on youtube and youngsters can collect thousands of sound files, but have you heard the Fred Rich Orchestra?
Compared to anyone in my opinion. I rate him the greatest musician ever - Mozart and Beethoven included. I am pretty confident you don't know McCartney or Mozart well enough to form a valid opinion on this.
@garethb1961 - re earlier comment where you rated Paul as the "greatest musician ever - Mozart and Beethoven included." - just what exactly do you mean???
@garethb1961 back to the issue - Paul McCartney is a solid successful musician/writer however he is not a music genius - in fact Lennon is closer to derserving that honour
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
you are wasting time over silly argument - fact is Paul is not a music genius, never was and never will be and his performances at 67 are embarresing to watch
I heard about this but didn't know if it was true. I guess it is...but I mean, all the better for Macca right? :)
I'm sure it wasn't neccesary, but more of taking care of things. A lot of people do this all the time, but still, like with anyone else it worries me a bit.
He's doing good though so I guess there isn't anything to worry about :)
I don't know if this is true or not, but if so, it is NOT surgery. It is done in a "cath lab " with the patient fully awake, takes about 30 minutes and the only incision is in the groin area, about a half inch long. This is often done as a preventative measure to avoid serious heart problems in the future. The patient is usually discharged within 48 hours, is told to quit smoking (if he or she did), watch the salt intake, exercise more and is usually put on specific preventative medications.
well he is 67 now so it's possible that this was done last year or before that at some time. paul's dad passed away suddenly in 1976 at the age of 74., when paul was in the middle of his ' wings over america ' tour, so it was very likley his heart that gave out. I can't honestly imagine that paul will still be touring when he's 74, but maybe he will, who knows?
u scare me with ur comment to be honest . i dont want to hear anything like this, though i know noone can escape from death. wishing his life would last for the longest as possible !
yes I would agree with you. & he's still good at it.. .. I would be happy if he just keeps making music in the studio for many years to come..when he did that interview with Letterman he seemed completely out of it like he wanted to be somewhere else, I'd never seen that in paul before so he is getting older, like all of us, I'm 51 & I've been listening to his music since I was 6 in 1964 so its almost like he's part of the family LOL
My job is current Beatles' news, and lies are not an immediate reason to sue. John and George's deaths prove they're human. What's the point of that 1st comment? On your seond comment, I can't argue with assumptions. This is so important to you you felt you had to reply twice??? You are trying to make a point on very shaky ground here it seems to me.
He is getting old so his heart is starting to give him troubles. After all those songs he wrote, stress is releasing itself as blue meanies throughout his bloodstream. He pisses blue liquid...lol Can you believe this?
Glad to hear that Paul is fine! And if Paul were really dead,he would not continue to amaze us with all of his awesome talents!!!! Wake up people!!!!! To say he's dead is just plain dumb.........
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
You must have no eye for detail, b/c it's so obvious it's not the same person. I guess you must believe that someone can change eye color, eyebrows, nose, forehead, hair part, height, voice, etc, all in the space of 4 months. Believe whatever you want, but that's just dumb.
It's been proven by forensic science that Paul McCartney was replaced in 1966. Differences in the mandibular curve, tragus, palate, canines, and nasal spine proved it wasn't the same guy in 1967 as before. Sorry if you can't accept that, but it's the truth.
Well it's not a secret anymore now is it?
Beatlelove100 5 days ago
This is definitely a secret plan to keep Macca alive. A world without him is unthinkable.
LouisJopling 6 months ago 10
how does shoving somthig up the groin help the heart???
facebook121000 8 months ago 3
@facebook121000 Very long plastic tube.
tlatosmd 6 months ago
@ therockfairy777....LOL
ogoniok 8 months ago
Well he is only human, I remember hearing that his mothers side of the family suffer from heart disease problems and he has alot of his mother in him(genetically speaking).
treejahone 10 months ago
thank god hes okay(: i would've been so sad if he was unhealthy :( I want to meet Paulie someday. :)
rissygirly22 10 months ago 5
I hope you guys know that Paul denied the rumours of this operation. He's fine, kicking and making amazing music :)
LasgalenOsten 1 year ago
Heart of the country!!!
lynnda99 1 year ago 22
Shit...no pressure on the doctor...NOT!
adampower1973 1 year ago 37
Are the surgery tools for sale?
Therockfairy777 1 year ago 2
majorgeek is musical wasteland!!!
mallard4998 1 year ago
I have jus had 5 stents inserted into TWO main coronary arteries...except they didnt TELL me they used 5. they wrote four..but i had to had the stents looked at and the surgeon in the ER said--...the legal limit per artery is TWO stents--theu used THREE in one artery and forged the paperwork. extra stent may cause my artery it to tear and I wil l die instantly ...Sir Paul--Who is yout Surgeon , I need a lawyer and a NEW surgeon.
DavelovesRealMusic 1 year ago
It isn't secret anymore.
ps3fanforever 1 year ago
fuck!!! He had an operation??
marniedrew 1 year ago
@marniedrew what big deal is it
MsBobohj 1 year ago
@MsBobohj It is to me. Bothered?
marniedrew 1 year ago
I'd like to pass Kylie through my groin.
steveconn 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
LIKE THIS IS YOU THINK majorgeeek SHOULD SHUT THE FUCK UP!
emmaexplosions 1 year ago
THUMBS UP IF YOU THINK majorgeeek IS AN IDIOT!!
emmaexplosions 1 year ago
@emmaexplosions the reason you insult is because you cannot rationally disprove - Paul McC is not a genius
majorgeeek 1 year ago
@majorgeeek your argument is invalid. please try again, dipshit.
he is a genius. READ about him. like, seriously, you really don't know enough to make a valid argument. you haven't been making a valid argument this entire time, and the reason I am insulting is because you deserve the insults. you're just a little fucker, you know that? please shut up... oh, and I have slight OCD... I have to reply -.- oh, and you really don't know what gtfaysb means, do you?
Sir, you FAIL.
emmaexplosions 1 year ago
@emmaexplosions your comment is very silly - and you have not prven a thing - Paul McC is no genius
majorgeeek 1 year ago
@majorgeeek you sir, have FAILED. Paul is a genius. If you can't see that, then you're dumber than I thought... which is kinda impossible... but you have proven it not to be. seriously, have you EVER read about him... like, his full history? I don't think you have, and you should.
Goodbye =D
emmaexplosions 1 year ago
@emmaexplosions PaulMcC full history does not indicate a genius - if it does then cite the reference
majorgeeek 1 year ago
@majorgeeek -hangs head- it doesn't need to say "by the way, Paul McCartney is a genius" but how he grew up and how he became what he is today and everything in between does prove that he has genius. seriously, you are LOSING give it up, everyone is against you! so shut the fuck up, i am tired of your fucking shit. du bist ein großer scheißen Kopf
you have failed. please die =D
emmaexplosions 1 year ago
@emmaexplosions rubbish - quit your Nazis raving - Paul is no genius and with you on his side who needs enemies
majorgeeek 1 year ago
@majorgeeek FYI, I'm Jewish, so talking about Nazis or any of that shit is extremely insulting. Paul is a genius. dude, STFU. seriously. please. no one likes you. if you don't comment, I don't respond, got it? please, do everyone a favor, and shut your trap because no one wants to hear your bullshit.
thank you, and fuck off.
emmaexplosions 1 year ago
@emmaexplosions saying Paul is a genius does not make him a genius - heck he can't even read music so he's a pretty dinb sort of genius??? - I note being Jewish hasn't stopped you from behaving like a foul mouthed Nazis
majorgeeek 1 year ago
@majorgeeek no, see, my great-grandparents were fresh off the boat Austrian and a lot of my family was killed in the holocaust. I know holocaust survivors, and I don't like the word "nazi" outside of school. it's quite insulting to someone with my connections. and if you keep saying what you did, that's like being racist actually when I told you that it's very insulting. now, unless you want to be a racist bastard, i suggest you shut your asshole mouth, and quit talking to me.
emmaexplosions 1 year ago
@majorgeeek Paul is a fucking genius. END OF STORY. please don't reply to this. I am really fucking annoyed. and the fact that he can't read music actually makes him more of a genius. I agree with garethb1961, you really haven't read enough about Mozart or Paul to make a valid opinion on this. seriously, shut up. please. I really can't take it anymore.
emmaexplosions 1 year ago
@emmaexplosions sounds like you forgot your medication - Mozart sets the genius benchmark - you cannot have a discussion about music genius without Mozart - in this respect Paul is irrelevant - a bit like your opinions
majorgeeek 1 year ago
@majorgeeek uh, dude, you really don't get it. Paul actually is a genius. Mozart was good too, but Paul is a genius as well. READ ABOUT THEM. god damn it. Oh, and btw, I'm actually very pissed right now, so shut the fuck up you fucking dipshit. please do us all a favor and go away.
emmaexplosions 1 year ago
@emmaexplosions what is there to get??? the onus is on YOU to prove he is a genius because there is practically no evidence to suggest Paul McCartney is a genius - either put up or shut up
majorgeeek 1 year ago
@majorgeeek shut up yourself. I HAVE proved that Paul's a genius, you're just too stubborn to accept that. seriously, if I see that you commented ONE more time, i will kill myself because I am fed up with your fucking shit.
emmaexplosions 1 year ago
@majorgeeek oh, and you haven't proved that he isn't a genius. therefore, he is.
emmaexplosions 1 year ago
@emmaexplosions geeze your'e stupid - going by your retarded reasoning puts everyone in category of genius - what a fuckwit
majorgeeek 1 year ago
@majorgeeek uh, no, dude, look at ALL the facts that i have put. that makes him a genius. he has done so many things and is able to do so many things, only a music genius could do all that. you are obviously a dipshit who does not have any friends. you are too stubborn to accept the fact that Paul is a music genius. GET OVER IT, YOU'RE NOT WINNING. he is a genius.
emmaexplosions 1 year ago
@majorgeeek now, if you've been trying to say that it is your OPINION that he isn't a genius, then you are an idiot for not stating that from the beginning. we wouldn't be fighting if you had said it was your OPINION. everything you've been saying is like you've been trying to get me to believe it is FACT.
is it your OPINION or do you believe it's FACT? please tell me.
emmaexplosions 1 year ago
@emmaexplosions it is a fact that Paul is a successful musician but has not reached intellectual pinnacle of a music genius - it is also a fact you are a full-blown fuckwit
majorgeeek 1 year ago
@majorgeeek don't be insulting yourself. see, you were acting like it was fact, not opinion, dipshit. you should have said early on that it was opinion. you are the fuckwit here, i am not. an i am tired of fucking fighting with you because you are one of the most stubborn idiots i've ever known. telling a ginormous (yes, I know ginormous isn't a real word -.-) Beatles fan that Paul is not a genius is one of the dumbest things ever. you cannot tell us otherwise. you. are. a. MORON. fuck off
emmaexplosions 1 year ago
@majorgeeek there you go again you just can't stop being a fuckwit - why just Paul??? why not call Clapton a genius, and Stevie Wonder, Ringo Starr, - If you call Paul a genius then you might as well call anyone a genius - where's your evidence??????????
majorgeeek 1 year ago
@majorgeeek are you fucking serious? you clearly have no idea of the bass guitar or MUSIC for that matter if you seriously believe what you just said... you should be smashed into pieces by one of macca's bass guitars for this grave, insolent crime!
rajbeast 1 year ago
@rajbeast if you are trying to show Paul is a genius then you have failed - why is it so important to make him a genius?? he clearly is not a music genius - he is a very successful and popular musician/writer but he has not reached the highest intellectual level of achievement - in fact he cannot even read music
majorgeeek 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
back to the issue - Paul McCartney is a solid successful musician/writer however he is not a music genius - in fact Lennon is closer to derserving that honour
majorgeeek 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
back to the issue - Paul McCartney is a solid successful musician/writer however he is not a music genius - in fact Lennon is closer to derserving that honour
majorgeeek 1 year ago
you all know that he never had the operation and had issued a statement on his own webpage about it not being true
kitty9tales 1 year ago
So even vegetarians can have clogged arteries?
ricointx 1 year ago
that sounded really gross.... Oh well :D
bubblegumicecream00 1 year ago
pretty sure the album "Ram" is proof of Paul's genius. What albums have you done?
nthier 1 year ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
nthier are you for real??? genius relates to highest level of human musical achievement perhaps Mozart or Beethoven - if you think Paul is in that category then you are an idiot
majorgeeek 1 year ago
aRe YoU sErIOus majorgeeek? goddam. Mozart and Beethoven is fine, but I seriously doubt they could have written pop-rock as well as lennon/mccartney. Get off the classical high horse and realize their is other great music. Miles Davis and Lee Morgan are also easily on the genius list.
nthier 1 year ago
@nthier no - rock is too limited a medium to define a genius - genius level represents the very highest level of human intellectual achievement eg the genius of Mozart, Beethoven - Paul may be great but he is not up to their standard and it helps if you can read music
majorgeeek 1 year ago
@majorgeeek the fact that he can't read music makes him even MORE of a genius! He can play SO damn well and remember EVERY note without ever having to write it down. I think that takes true genius to be able to do that. Now stop being so uptight with Mozart and Beethoven. take it from a cellist who plays that Beethoven and Mozart in orchestra. PAUL IS A FUCKING GENIUS.
emmaexplosions 1 year ago
@emmaexplosions Paul cannot read music then he doesn't know music then he is no music genius
majorgeeek 1 year ago
@majorgeeek OI! I'm a freaking cellist, so freaking take it from me!! it really takes true genius to remember all those chords!! seriously, you're not gonna win. he can remember EVERY SONG that he's EVER WRITTEN and play them perfectly without writing it down! How can someone who's NOT a genius do that? oh, and read up on him... his childhood, his music career, he is a genius. end of story!!!!
emmaexplosions 1 year ago
@emmaexplosions no that is no definition of genius - keep trying
majorgeeek 1 year ago
@majorgeeek really? because your definition of "genius" was high intellect... I don't think they had good education back in the time of Beethoven or Mozart -.- dude, cut the crap, he's a genius and you know it. end of story!! you really are a geek. now look, I told you before, I am a cellist, and I have played Mozart, and Bach, and Beethoven, and all that other stuff, but I have also played Beatles songs. HE'S A FREAKING GENIUS! Have you ever HEARD Blackbird? OH MY GOD, IT'S BEAUTIFUL!!
emmaexplosions 1 year ago
@emmaexplosions you sound more like a freakin idiot - and Paul is no genius because he hasn't reached the highest levels of human achievement - in a world of geniuses Paul is average
majorgeeek 1 year ago
@majorgeeek
Uhm, sorry but are you Heather Mill?
Cigaraholic 1 year ago
@majorgeeek hey, guess what Paul did? he wrote stuff for orchestra =) Classical stuff. you're a freaking idiot. did you know that you're losing this battle because you have no friends and everyone here hates you? geez. you really don't get it, do you? you see, you obviously don't know everything about Paul because you're too stubborn to learn. I'm probably smarter than you... scratch that, I AM smarter than you XDD
emmaexplosions 1 year ago
@emmaexplosions what's with all the insults and battle stuff??? Paul wrote classical stuff with the help of a computer since he cannot read music - in any case it was a massive flop - it is a wonder your "probably smarter" brain can generate enough power to use a keyboard
majorgeeek 1 year ago
@majorgeeek wow, you're a moron. Paul composed so many fucking songs that no bloody artist could be him at that, Paul can basically play every instrument known to man, he was in 2 successful bands and is 68 but still rocking out like a 20 year old! He is very wise and smart! He is clearly the genius..of all geniuses
BTW, he also went into the Guinness world record book as the MOST successful musician.
It's a wonder how you can even read... I'm really starting to wonder how you're fighting me..
emmaexplosions 1 year ago
@emmaexplosions playing multiple instruments, being in successful bands and 68 and still rocking, wise and smart and the rest of it are not definitions of genius - put simply so that even a retrograde like you can understand - Paul has not reached the highest intellectual level of achievement and creativity to be called a genius - compared to Mozart Paul's music ability is on par with a worm - the fact that he appeals to morons like you works against him too
majorgeeek 1 year ago
@majorgeeek oh, so you're talking about intellect? we have a better education now than they did back in the time of Mozart, dipshit. do you understand you are LOSING? geez. if you don't like Paul, just say so. don't be insulting him... you are the moron here... and how many times do I have to tell you that I AM A CELLIST. what instrument do you play? he is extremely creative too, so what the hell are you talking about? the fact that you are trying to win against Paul fans is completely idotic.
emmaexplosions 1 year ago
@emmaexplosions no you were wrong before and you are wrong now - not surprising you resort to insults since you have nothing intelligent to say - I am not insulting Paul - he is an excellent performer and I like his music however he is not a music genius - there is nothing wrong with that - if you call him a genius then you might as well call anyone a genius
majorgeeek 1 year ago
@majorgeeek actually, you ARE insulting him, and I'm going through something really rough in my life, so would you shut up and accept the fact that you are actually wrong!? he IS a genius. END OF STORY, moron. to be able to do the things that he does is true genius. so fuck off and shut up because everyone here is tired of your shit. gtfaysb. try to figure that out, and if you can't, you're a fucking loser and an idiot. leave me the fuck alone!!!!
emmaexplosions 1 year ago
@emmaexplosions Paul McC is not a genius - your insults will not change that - atcually you should heed some of you OWN advice and put up or shut up
majorgeeek 1 year ago
@majorgeeek Paul McCartney got an award from the President, performed for the president, been in 2 successful bands and has his own career, is still performing and going on tours, So just fuck off :] Paul can kick your ass
RickyGervaisFreak 1 year ago
@RickyGervaisFreak gee Paul got an award from the president gee does that make him a genius gee golly derrrrrr - another village idiot
majorgeeek 1 year ago
@majorgeeek "Gee" are you an idiot? Oh why yes you are, fuck off, no one cares about your whiny ass little problems, go fuck yourself and listen to the gay ass screeching noises that you call "music" Paul McCartney can kick your ass.
RickyGervaisFreak 1 year ago
@majorgeeek
Paul is incredibly talented. That's why he doesn't need to learn to read music - a very basic one.
Find me someone who could play such so many instruments, composed/performed such so many timeless songs - without ability of reading any piece of music?
In fact, it just makes him unique. There will be no second like Paul - in the World of Geniuses or whatever.
Cigaraholic 1 year ago
@Cigaraholic it is obvious you are very fond of Paul McC however you offer not one shred of realistc evidence that Paul is a music genius - why? because there is no eveidence - the world is filled with unique musicians which are not even close to music genius
majorgeeek 1 year ago
@majorgeeek
Look around you and see how many people have the same idea with you.
Evidence is unnecessary because the rest of the world have the same idea with me.
And it's obviously that you can't deny all the facts i've said below, so quit youtube and get a life.
Or just admit you're Heather Mill then I'll ignore you right after.
Cigaraholic 1 year ago
@Cigaraholic Paul McCartney is not a music genius because he has not reached the highest intellectual achievement and creativity of a genius - it seems obvious you ignore the fact that popularity is not a measure of genius
majorgeeek 1 year ago
Comment removed
Cigaraholic 1 year ago
@majorgeeek
Sorry, do you know anything about Paul McCartney? Or just his name?
Cigaraholic 1 year ago
@Cigaraholic sure - it's common knowledge Paul's solo career never came close to the former fame of Beatles - most of his hits were all co-written - he may be popular but then so too are many other musicians who even better than he - ergo Paul is not a music genius
majorgeeek 1 year ago
@majorgeeek
The Beatles was the best one of music history.
Paul solo career was not as good as The Beatles era, but still in the TOP of everything. You expect a legendary man can beat a legendary band, which was made by himsel also? You're nut.
Well well well, even God can be hated by someone like you I see.
This WORLD know Paul is one of the greatest legend, musician, singer ever, so only a moron who want to downgrade him? Who cares.
Nice try but not impressive enough.
Cigaraholic 1 year ago
@Cigaraholic legendary musician is not a definition of genius - I don't hate Paul - I think you are an idiot
majorgeeek 1 year ago
@majorgeeek
So you're jealous of him. I get it.
And I don't think you know how to use your brain to think, so forgive me to put your worlds into trash bag.
Cheer.
Cigaraholic 1 year ago
If he had consumed enough collegen and gelatin, this never would have happend to him
kitty9tales 1 year ago
@kitty9tales He wouldn't consume gelatin because that is derived from animals.
No, he probably was lacking in omega 3 if he didn't eat fish and consuming too much omega 6 which is found in vegetable oils. The normal balance is 1 to 1 for optimum heart health.
periperigord 1 year ago
i saw hem on a conert 09 novemer
it was fu**ing GREAT !!!
NanenMauricio 1 year ago
back to the issue - Paul McCartney is a solid successful musician/writer however he is not a music genius - in fact Lennon is closer to derserving that honour
majorgeeek 1 year ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
some secret - I suppose with better blood low to the brain he will now compose some real music ----- or perhaps not?
majorgeeek 1 year ago
@majorgeeek i was gonna say some thing but your name sez it all
lotec51 1 year ago
@lotec51 you typical yank wank
majorgeeek 1 year ago
first off your a child. and i won't have a battle wits with you,your unarmed.i do see you have 4 thumbs down
lotec51 1 year ago
@lotec51 yes it is far better idea to look like a fool than open your mouth and confirm it
majorgeeek 1 year ago
Uuuurgh I would hate to do that
Flamethh 1 year ago
well for a start music genius can read music
majorgeeek 2 years ago
I would think just the opposite. Being Paul McCartney n not being able to read music makes u more impressive, n therefore a genius in my book. Think about it...
Christien23 1 year ago
no thanks that sounds like backward logic - if Paul were a genius reading music would have been a breeze
majorgeeek 1 year ago
But instead of learning how to read music, he became the writer/composer of more hits than probably any other musical artist of the 20th century, or any your favorite Classical artists (or John). So in his case, clearly, being brilliant has been a breeze.
Christien23 1 year ago
the Beatles was not only Paul - most of early hits were co written Lennon & McCartney - his later hits never reached the Beatles brilliance which proves Paul is not brilliant
majorgeeek 1 year ago
The Beatles set the bar for pop/music acts of the 20th century. No act, individual or otherwise, has had such an impact (including the individual members of the group themselves). Now, if you personally don't like Paul's extensive catalog in the 40 years since the band broke up, and you feel Paul's lost it since his Beatles' days, that's a totally subjective thing. In other words, YOU think Paul hasn't been brilliant as a solo artist. That doesn't mean Paul is not a brilliant artist/music genius
Christien23 1 year ago
@Christien23 - you are wrong - Paul is not brilliant nor genius - the facts speak for themselves - do some basic research
majorgeeek 1 year ago
The facts- he's one half of the core singing/songwriting team of the greatest pop/rock band of all-time, he's listed as the most successful musician/composer in pop music history by Guinness, his body of work spans over 50 years with contributions in virtually all areas of music, and he's composed tons and tons of hits as a Beatle and a solo artist- are overwhelmingly in favor of the brilliant genius argument.
Christien23 1 year ago
rubbish - success and fame is not a measure of genius
majorgeeek 1 year ago
Agreed. Talent is a measure of genius. And, insomuch as Paul's knack for song composition, natural gift for creating memorable melodies, harmonizing skills, and multi-instrumental acumen have guided his 50-plus year music career- one which has left us with oodles and oodles of classic songs/brilliant melodies- Paul's talent is special. He's one of the greatest muscians/composers of all-time because that's what our ears have always told us...
Christien23 1 year ago
@Christien23 your description fits over a thousand musicians of 20C none of whom are geniuses
majorgeeek 1 year ago
The problem with your argument is that, according to you, Paul McCartney becomes a genius if/when he learns how to read music (which is something I'm sure he could do anyway, if he tried). You also seem to feel that Mozart was somehow better than Paul. I'm not sure why you think this. Paul has written more music than Mozart... you're taking a completely subjective approach. You say "Paul isn't as good as he was as a Beatle." I could just as easily retort "Wolfgang wasn't great until his 30's."
Christien23 1 year ago
Your approach is weak. It doesn't make any sense.
Christien23 1 year ago
@Christien23 the reason you cannot prove Paul is a genius is because he isn't a genius.
majorgeeek 1 year ago
You haven't proved Paul isn't a genius, dude. I'm even less convinced of that now than I was when I got into this debate with you.
Christien23 1 year ago
@Christien23 your logic is backward - Paul doea not even come close to the benchmark of music genius - its up to you to prove his genius which you cannot because he is not a genius
majorgeeek 1 year ago
"It's up to you to prove his genius which you cannot beccause he is not a genius." OK, I just looked up the word genius in my Concise Dictionary and found these definitions: "An exceptional natural capacity of intellect"; "A person having such capacity"; "Natural ability or talent." Note the words "Natural" and Talent", geek. As in, Paul is a naturally gifted songwriter/musician- one who never learned how to play music. This is what I've been saying. How do u not understand this?
Christien23 1 year ago
no bumkin - if you call Paul a genius then you might as well call everyone a genius - when will you wake up?
majorgeeek 1 year ago
@majorgeeek You're an idiot.
Christien23 1 year ago
you are wrong there as well - fact is you still cannot prove Paul is a genius
majorgeeek 1 year ago
@Christien23 mayor greek is right, he is no genius he did write good music and so did lennon but non of them are "GENIUS" although lennon kicks most ass
masonhi 1 year ago
You really haven't paid attention if you think he hasn't achived periods post Beatles of great success- His Wings period was phenomenally successful - had more top 40 hits than any other artist in the 70's, Band On The Run was voted album of the year by Rolling Stone in 1974 Mull Of Kyntyre is still the biggest non charity single in the UK and in his first Wings tours, he played NO Beatle tunes- Comparing artists is odious as Lennon once said and comparing him to Mozart is unfair - just enjoy
slappyabromowitz 2 years ago 4
slappybromwitz - success is not a function of genius
majorgeeek 2 years ago
So not being sarcastic here- define genius...For Me, he is one, Lennon, Dylan, Marley, Hendrix perhaps Miles Davis as far as the modern error- his innovations with the Beatles and his gift for melody give him strong consideration-His repuattion might not stand along with the great masters of classical music but his melodies will be heard just as theres are...
slappyabromowitz 2 years ago
the word genius is not correct to descibe Paul. Genius ability ranks as the HIGHEST mental ability/ achievement possible - although Paul is good achieving genius ranking is still a greasy pole for him
majorgeeek 2 years ago
he was one quarter of the worlds number one group a genius in my mind.
paulallen34 2 years ago
@paulallen34 stop writing nonsense - Paul's picutre next to Mozart's - what a monumental joke
majorgeeek 2 years ago
assholes like you piss me off, the beatles were the worlds number one group even 40 years later there still talked of.
paulallen34 2 years ago 2
The Beatles was not only just Paul McCartney - nearly all their songs written by Lennon and McCartney - Paul never came even close to the former fame of the Beatles and is struggling to make the best top fifty
majorgeeek 2 years ago
Paul was never a genius - he simply has not got the ability or creativity to belong to that inately elite category
majorgeeek 2 years ago
He is a Genious !
mmmvvvify 2 years ago
mmmvvvify maybe Paul is a "Genious" - but he is not a genius
majorgeeek 2 years ago
you shouldnt talk. i would use the word genius but paul can write a song in his sleep better than you
MrLetschangetheworld 2 years ago
fatty deposits? thought this bloke were a veggystarian...must have been the crappy sixites fags and pepper steaks.
simonbath 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
no argument - musically speaking Paul McDungbeetle is dead anyway - he is nothing more but a past icon of western commercialism
majorgeeek 2 years ago
Fuck this gay show! This show is becoming a problem to Paul McCartney. You people are really beginning to piss me off! You're a disgrace, Showbiz! You're making up rumors about Paul McCartney that aren't true, and that's also upsetting him. You bitches need to get a life and leave Paul alone. How 'bout talk shit about Britney Spears or The Jonas Brothers? Those people fit in your 'gay category', you stupid ignorant fucks!
Alien8990 2 years ago 2
at least all those people are young and sexually active which is a whole lot more than Paul
majorgeeek 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Well, I'm older than a lot of you, or the whole lot of you, judging from the way you write. Pop music began when they started selling sheet music at the turn of the century. Put the Beatles in perspective. They changed the course of pop music in a few short years. Name a writer/performer before or after them with as much impact. Anyone can get on youtube and youngsters can collect thousands of sound files, but have you heard the Fred Rich Orchestra?
shimanagashimono 2 years ago
Comment removed
shimanagashimono 2 years ago
Comment removed
shimanagashimono 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Paul is not a music genius - and at 67 his moribund performance is embaressing to say the least
majorgeeek 2 years ago
Wait. Fair is fair. Have your fun. But Paul pretty much IS; hands down You are lame and so's your remark!
biggibson49 2 years ago
Paul was a musical genius. His lame-ass replaCIAment is not.
faulconandsnowjob 2 years ago
music genius? - compared to whom? - not Mozart
majorgeeek 2 years ago
Compared to Faul he was
faulconandsnowjob 2 years ago
Compared to anyone in my opinion. I rate him the greatest musician ever - Mozart and Beethoven included. I am pretty confident you don't know McCartney or Mozart well enough to form a valid opinion on this.
garethb1961 2 years ago 7
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Paul McC is not a music genius nowhere near the genius of Mozart
majorgeeek 2 years ago
gareth - don't be absurd - if you call McCartney a genius then lets call anyone a genius!
majorgeeek 2 years ago
@garethb1961 - re earlier comment where you rated Paul as the "greatest musician ever - Mozart and Beethoven included." - just what exactly do you mean???
majorgeeek 1 year ago
@garethb1961 any one who says Paul McC is greater musician than Mozart is not operating on all cylinders
majorgeeek 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@garethb1961 back to the issue - Paul McCartney is a solid successful musician/writer however he is not a music genius - in fact Lennon is closer to derserving that honour
majorgeeek 5 months ago
majorgeeek 1 year ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
you are wasting time over silly argument - fact is Paul is not a music genius, never was and never will be and his performances at 67 are embarresing to watch
majorgeeek 2 years ago
I think that who is wasting time is you to make fool comments.
ccbgable 2 years ago
hahaha every last comment on the first page has a thumbs down XD wtf!
CrimsonBaby11 2 years ago
do you think this is real?????
TheDannyford 2 years ago
yes, very simple procedure.I had it done and was back at work next day.
kooodeal 2 years ago
Paul is alive and well, living quietly in Scotland.
pleased9 2 years ago
I heard about this but didn't know if it was true. I guess it is...but I mean, all the better for Macca right? :)
I'm sure it wasn't neccesary, but more of taking care of things. A lot of people do this all the time, but still, like with anyone else it worries me a bit.
He's doing good though so I guess there isn't anything to worry about :)
Long live Paulie!! :D
loveisyou18 2 years ago
that guy sure was nice
he said some other dude had the same surgery and had a freakin heart attack
nice to know he cares bout Macca's health
Twilightteen12295 2 years ago
I don't know if this is true or not, but if so, it is NOT surgery. It is done in a "cath lab " with the patient fully awake, takes about 30 minutes and the only incision is in the groin area, about a half inch long. This is often done as a preventative measure to avoid serious heart problems in the future. The patient is usually discharged within 48 hours, is told to quit smoking (if he or she did), watch the salt intake, exercise more and is usually put on specific preventative medications.
proken58 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Paul may pass away soon. Another dead Beatle
LollieSmith 2 years ago
Comment removed
kooodeal 2 years ago
Heather Mills,
can I set your leg on fire? =)
allscreaming 2 years ago 3
May I supply the lighter fluid and the matches?
hobbitbuddy 2 years ago
The heart surgery was a LIE created by Heather Mills to try to show that Paul was too sickly to have custody over Beatrice..
csillag4 2 years ago
Someone clone Macca b4 he dissapears
boliboy2299 2 years ago 7
well he is 67 now so it's possible that this was done last year or before that at some time. paul's dad passed away suddenly in 1976 at the age of 74., when paul was in the middle of his ' wings over america ' tour, so it was very likley his heart that gave out. I can't honestly imagine that paul will still be touring when he's 74, but maybe he will, who knows?
brucewayne909 2 years ago
u scare me with ur comment to be honest . i dont want to hear anything like this, though i know noone can escape from death. wishing his life would last for the longest as possible !
taegooksaram 2 years ago 2
i think that if he lives to 90 he'll still be touring lol what can we say the guy loves makin music
soccergirl97979 2 years ago 6
yes I would agree with you. & he's still good at it.. .. I would be happy if he just keeps making music in the studio for many years to come..when he did that interview with Letterman he seemed completely out of it like he wanted to be somewhere else, I'd never seen that in paul before so he is getting older, like all of us, I'm 51 & I've been listening to his music since I was 6 in 1964 so its almost like he's part of the family LOL
brucewayne909 2 years ago 3
This comment has received too many negative votes show
I heard that he actually had a heart put in.
MrGuypod 2 years ago
No, that was the Tin Woodsman.
sSurrenderDorothy 2 years ago
So many lies make it to "news" I'd need to have this verified before I believed it. I don't think it's true.
beatlesnumber9 2 years ago
Weel, let me tell you: Paul is just a human being after all, fame and enormous musical talent apart. he is subject to disease as death as well.
On the other hand, what you say is true but at this point he would've sued and everybody would know.
chinchonchinchon 2 years ago
Assuming that it is true: Paul is an obsessive vegetarian...
I respect his intention of being respectful to animal life, but this doesn't eqaul always radiant health.
chinchonchinchon 2 years ago
My job is current Beatles' news, and lies are not an immediate reason to sue. John and George's deaths prove they're human. What's the point of that 1st comment? On your seond comment, I can't argue with assumptions. This is so important to you you felt you had to reply twice??? You are trying to make a point on very shaky ground here it seems to me.
beatlesnumber9 2 years ago
He is getting old so his heart is starting to give him troubles. After all those songs he wrote, stress is releasing itself as blue meanies throughout his bloodstream. He pisses blue liquid...lol Can you believe this?
jpsmart59 2 years ago
Glad to hear that Paul is fine! And if Paul were really dead,he would not continue to amaze us with all of his awesome talents!!!! Wake up people!!!!! To say he's dead is just plain dumb.........
3994446 2 years ago
If I were married to Heather Mills, I'd probably need a heart operation (or several), too.
scandalouzmegz 2 years ago 6
oh, you know. obviously paul is dead. i mean, honestly, barefoot? must be!
/sarcasm
wickedredlights 2 years ago 2
This comment has received too many negative votes show
You must have no eye for detail, b/c it's so obvious it's not the same person. I guess you must believe that someone can change eye color, eyebrows, nose, forehead, hair part, height, voice, etc, all in the space of 4 months. Believe whatever you want, but that's just dumb.
faulconandsnowjob 2 years ago
Only dumb ting is you, asshole.
ericthedead4 2 years ago
It's been proven by forensic science that Paul McCartney was replaced in 1966. Differences in the mandibular curve, tragus, palate, canines, and nasal spine proved it wasn't the same guy in 1967 as before. Sorry if you can't accept that, but it's the truth.
faulconandsnowjob 2 years ago