Great video, I download the 3 a340s including the 600 on simaviation and all of them failed to load the bodie of the plain every time, but the wings were visible and present, how did you upload your a340- 600 to fsx, please.
no, it does not land the plane automatic. the vor09 approach is a gps route entered in the fgmc via waypoints. i turned of the ap at about 400 feet above ground und landed manually.
it´s just a lot of practice to land right on the centerline.
yes it´s a manual landing without ILS, but i use the VOR09 Approach entered in the FGMC both via GPS Waypoints and the PJM VOR frequence tuned into the NAV. The rest is calculating a reasonable descentrate depending on your approachspeed and a lot of practice for the final approach to land nearly somewhere behind the pianobars and centered on the runway. by the way the PAPI is a good help too.
how do you activate the VOR09 Approach does it land the plane auto? i tried landing in TNCM using GPS becasue no ILS but the airplane landed at the side of the runway.. and there si no traffic in my flytampa st maarten scenery.. pls help me dude..
my computer has a 2.8 GHz Pentium 4. Im thinking of buyng a Ge Force 8500 512mb and update my Ram to 1.5 GB(i have Windows XP). Do you think í will be able to play the game in high with 15 to 20 fps rate?
ummm, I would say yes. I would probably go with the 8600 GTS or GT 512 or 256mb card. I would say more ram too. and if you could dual core. I have a dual core 2.13GHz 2 G ram and 8600 GT 256 mb computer. Runs about 10 to 15 on average well depends what airport.
ummm, I would say yes. I would probably go with the 8600 GTS or GT 512 or 256mb card. I would say more ram too. and if you could dual core. I have a dual core 2.13GHz 2 G ram and 8600 GT 256 mb computer. Runs about 10 to 15 on average well depends what airport.
Somebody Help me! I have FSX Demo and I have the old version of Princess Julianna Airport. I downloaded the new one but its not showing up. Can someone give me a video I can look at to help me or something!
I don´t think it´s a hard landing. The soundeffect are only a bit loud. For a TNCM Landing DME/VOR Approach without ILS and Autolanding it should be ok.
You have to make some adjustments to the panel configuration. Search avsim or other FS Websites for a documentation on how to make Overland FS2004 planes FSX compatible, or if you want it the easy way i mail you my config.
O.O I live in Belleair Beach, right next to clearwater, i love Tampa! Didnt know they added so much in the addon around the airport. Xgraphics and Active Sky X are worth getting, but they have a heavy price tag for somehting you can go without
This video is not about the Tampa Airport. It´s about the landing of an Air France Airbus A340-300 at Princess Juliana Airport(TNCM, Netherland Antilles), which is a regular scheduled flight from Paris Charles De Gaulle Airport. The scenery used in FSX is from FlyTampa software company.
FPS differ between 15 and 20 when flying without recording with Fraps. When i record the video with Fraps, the FPS reduces about 2-3 FPS, because Fraps uses some CPU time for it´s simple type of compression.
This is possibly the best FSX vid ive seen, Ive just bought Active Sky and GFX and it makes a fantastic improvement to FSX.... This is a lovely vid mate...
The difference in terms of clockspeed is above 1 GHz, 2.13 compared to 3.2. It does have some impact, especially when your are running Aktive Sky X or other tools like FDC Live Cockpit X, FSC 8 etc. in the background. It should give some FPS, but i really didn´t test it out yet. I am also limited by my Graphics-Card which is an ATI 1950 Pro, and ATI Cards usually don´t do well in FSX. Nvidias are a lot better when counting FPS. So my next task is to buy an 8800 GTS and rework the video.
Thanks mrburner2007. I was wondering how well the X1950 Pro scaled, but it's hard to tell with this title since it requires both CPU and GPU resources. Be interesting to see at what point it bottlenecks. It looks good on your system, but I agree that a Geforce 8800 GTS would be better..would you get the 320MB or the 640MB one?. Your PSU would be pulling a few amps as well, with that upgrade :)
Yes, it really requires a lot CPU and GPU power, and of course you need at least 2 Gigs of RAM, otherwise it´s almost unplayable.
My point is, that i always want to play FSX with 1280x1024, at highest settings and FSAA, including lens flare and light bloom which cost an aweful lot of gpu power.
I will try the 320MB GTS, which is about 100 Euros cheaper here in Germany than the 640MB version. I own a 450W BeQuiet Straight Power PSU. It should do the job with the GTS.
i got a question, my laptops processor is an intel centrino duo @ 1.66ghz 1.67ghz, fsx runs smoothly on my pc but at mid-lows n lows i only got aircraft and scenary on high; but the case is would it make a difference if i overclock my processor, thou i dont even noe how, so how do u overclock a prossesor? is a laptop
My system specs are in the Videoinfo, but here they are again:
Gigabyte 965P DS3, Core 2 Duo E6400 overclocked at 3.2 GHz, ATI 1950 Pro, 2 Gigs of DDR2-800. FSX nearly at full detail + 6 times Fullscale Antialasing.
what traffic do you have on FS
jetblueilikeful 8 months ago
how you record the video fsx?
boyzde972 8 months ago
mine is all messing up showing me 2 white center lines on the runway does anyone no the problem?
hongkong57 9 months ago
DOwload link please. :D
jamskie2425 10 months ago
Jesus Christ, learn to FLARE
kozarac5 1 year ago 2
i realy need this update for this airport(only if its freeware)
plz put link in reply!
THX
ryan0157 1 year ago
good landing and graphics subscribe to mi channel please
to see my videos
dellave1 1 year ago
where did you get the scenery?
Blaedin 1 year ago
Great video, I download the 3 a340s including the 600 on simaviation and all of them failed to load the bodie of the plain every time, but the wings were visible and present, how did you upload your a340- 600 to fsx, please.
JH4292 1 year ago
can someone reply on this comment??? how come other fsx users have a jetway on their TNCM airport and I dont??? ps reply
blueynasser14 1 year ago
nice scenery.....but the landing was........HORRIBLE.!
georgeiulian89 1 year ago
how do u get tht view
hawk45653 1 year ago
Great landing! Right in the middle of the centerline too! 5 stars.
mylife1221 2 years ago
Shitty landing! i bet the bottom part of the fuselage needed repair! scenery is BEAUTIFUL but work on ur landings!!!!!
fromsalone2 2 years ago 2
and with flaps fully retract lol
GIANNHSPEIRAIAS 2 years ago
is this how the airport looks like in real life. or is just an add-on to make look nicer
cd949604 2 years ago
this is how the airport looks like in real life!
fromsalone2 2 years ago
just a bit of lag there
QantasFan747 2 years ago
nice graphics and nice landing.
teduwas 2 years ago
SOMEBODY CAN HELP ME!!!, When I try to land in TNCM I land under the runway please help me !!
Mrmartinnico 2 years ago
Can someone give me a link for the
A340-300 Air France overland? I can't find it.
FLIGHTCOMPANY 2 years ago
The repaint only.
FLIGHTCOMPANY 2 years ago
the sky looks awesome
greatbrita 2 years ago
Not the best landing but nice video!
microsoftflightsim08 2 years ago
you did not flare!!!!!!!!!!!
sasvarp001 2 years ago
awesome video but hard landing !
fernousdu972 2 years ago
he dun a hard landing because at his speed it would have flew up again
planeboys 2 years ago
rofl 1200 thats sad really spend it on life?...
WarGodKills 2 years ago
when you get flytampa do you just install it or do you need other shit
nathanbrett15 2 years ago
no, it does not land the plane automatic. the vor09 approach is a gps route entered in the fgmc via waypoints. i turned of the ap at about 400 feet above ground und landed manually.
it´s just a lot of practice to land right on the centerline.
mrburner2007 2 years ago
hey man...how do u land like tat in tncm..i kno its manual landing..and i tried to do manual...buh i never get it rite...can u teach me plz :)?
3913792 2 years ago
yes it´s a manual landing without ILS, but i use the VOR09 Approach entered in the FGMC both via GPS Waypoints and the PJM VOR frequence tuned into the NAV. The rest is calculating a reasonable descentrate depending on your approachspeed and a lot of practice for the final approach to land nearly somewhere behind the pianobars and centered on the runway. by the way the PAPI is a good help too.
mrburner2007 2 years ago
how do you activate the VOR09 Approach does it land the plane auto? i tried landing in TNCM using GPS becasue no ILS but the airplane landed at the side of the runway.. and there si no traffic in my flytampa st maarten scenery.. pls help me dude..
seaboo143 2 years ago
nice landing video and all does this plane come with this addon(does the complete addon for 37.00$come with planes)
777janek 3 years ago
no but moving cars hold redome of the airport. on my comp i cant run Captiansim there
TDJP123 2 years ago
if you flared more it would have been perfect.
fsimpro 3 years ago
BANG!, passengers would be suing for whip lash!
Pearcey2006 3 years ago 5
with add-on scenery installed and running, do you need to have all the scenery settings up?
jimbotrains 3 years ago
u get the scenery from fly tamps but it costs money
Rubber290 3 years ago
i have it for free! i gt it from a torrent :)
XxXDELTAxFOXTROTXxX 3 years ago
Great thing to say on the internet, your truly a genius.
OhHaHaThatsCool 3 years ago 2
Cool Vid guy!!!
5*
FatMancubus 3 years ago
soes anybody know where i can fget TNCM scenery plz plz plz reply if u know. :):):)
tereoneonetwo 3 years ago
thepiratebay(dot)org/tor/4226809/FSX_-_Fly_Tampa(TNCM)%5B973%5D.zip
...I downloaded it 5 mins ago and it amazing.
=)
ncodrington 3 years ago
LH993, i've got a nvidia geforce 512mb too, but nvidia has tricked you. the graphics card doesn't use all 512mb
joblowflight5 3 years ago
but its far from a good st mateen landing
Ramster211 3 years ago
question: what are "active sky x" and "graphics x" for?
schllimann 3 years ago
Active Sky is a weather addon and Graphics X is a texture addon for runways etc.
mrburner2007 3 years ago
ur landing is quite good good vid
allibowthepilot 3 years ago
that landing sounded like something broke
26Waltey 3 years ago
my computer has a 2.8 GHz Pentium 4. Im thinking of buyng a Ge Force 8500 512mb and update my Ram to 1.5 GB(i have Windows XP). Do you think í will be able to play the game in high with 15 to 20 fps rate?
LH993 4 years ago
ummm, I would say yes. I would probably go with the 8600 GTS or GT 512 or 256mb card. I would say more ram too. and if you could dual core. I have a dual core 2.13GHz 2 G ram and 8600 GT 256 mb computer. Runs about 10 to 15 on average well depends what airport.
thefsxflyer 3 years ago
ummm, I would say yes. I would probably go with the 8600 GTS or GT 512 or 256mb card. I would say more ram too. and if you could dual core. I have a dual core 2.13GHz 2 G ram and 8600 GT 256 mb computer. Runs about 10 to 15 on average well depends what airport.
thefsxflyer 3 years ago
ur crp at landing, u touch down way to late
Ramster211 4 years ago
i bet your landings are crap too so shut up
tootoo50 4 years ago
oh yea ram its me tootoo50 dont u see where the markers tell you the area where you should touch down he touched down at the right time u fuck tard
aircanadapilotz 3 years ago
Ramster211: Actually he didn't touch down late! He touched down just before the LZ. ; )
colesy93 3 years ago
will this run the game well?
will this run fsx ok? E6400 INTELCORE2 2.3GHz NVIDIA 8500GT 512MB 200GB HDD 1x2GB
hatakekakashi1914 4 years ago
I have an pentium D 2,8 GHz, 1Gb RAm, ATI Radeon X1300 512Mb and my FSX works really slow. what might be the problem?pls help! thx
maddoxomar 4 years ago
To less RAM, 2GB should be the minimum.
To slow GFX-Card. Buy something like Geforce 8800 or Radeon 2900 HD.
If you don´t want to buy something, set the GFX-Setting of FSX to low.
mrburner2007 4 years ago
thx a lot!
maddoxomar 4 years ago
why'd you fully idle the engines at 50 ft?this makes harder landings =) good job on teh video though =D
xenycexvlad 4 years ago
Somebody Help me! I have FSX Demo and I have the old version of Princess Julianna Airport. I downloaded the new one but its not showing up. Can someone give me a video I can look at to help me or something!
KingOfKingsJ 4 years ago
Great landing, great scenery, great video. :)
harryg94 4 years ago
what do u mean "killing the passengers"?
taranpreet1 4 years ago
It reall bugs me alot that in FSX Princess Juliana is not as big as it is in real life
seb13gp 4 years ago
did you use DX10 or DX9?
Love the landing!
accodiman 4 years ago
you killed all the little kids
fighterpilot122 4 years ago
BooooMM :D LoL Super landing
nakatags 4 years ago
good job on killing the passengers lol
Gidien2000 4 years ago
yea amen, feel bad for the little infants who hit their heads on the side of the plane and now are mentally retarded. Keep trying. Smaller plane.
duk309 4 years ago
That was not a landing. That was an explosion. LOL.
I liked the video, but the sound effects is quite exagerated.
reguard 4 years ago
Nice landing! And WOW what a Graphic!!:):)
alexander9419 4 years ago
The reversers have tabs you see and that a good invention because it slows the plane down
henry160596 4 years ago
where did you get the plane from? thanks reply back pls
extremes46 4 years ago
nice approach, the 343 was the PSS or another model??
Regards
GastonSaez 4 years ago
It´s the Overland(Simmers Sky) model of the 343.
mrburner2007 4 years ago
soz nice vid mate
Jorwill64 4 years ago
nice vid mat
Jorwill64 4 years ago
sick and serious wiked video keep them coming my fsx videos suck :(
andym551 4 years ago
hey man, what's is your system config?
Kristopher209 4 years ago
where u got that plane nd sound effects
trl123x 4 years ago
hey if i want to buy fs scenery will it work for fsx??
kurfew1100 4 years ago
pretty hard landing... :/
NoFL88 4 years ago
I don´t think it´s a hard landing. The soundeffect are only a bit loud. For a TNCM Landing DME/VOR Approach without ILS and Autolanding it should be ok.
mrburner2007 4 years ago
Actually i havent even saw you flare... Maybe its because of angles. Maybe. Nice vid anyway.
NoFL88 4 years ago
It was not really necessary to flare a lot as i was landing with only 5 % fuel left and a relativly low approachspeed and plenty of runway left.
mrburner2007 4 years ago
did u have 2 put ur product key again when u downloaded the service pack sinse i lost the productkey n i dont know if 2 take the risk
trl123x 4 years ago
damm i try it out n it keeps asking for the product key n i lost it, my fsx is dun
trl123x 4 years ago
nvr mind, sp1 already works i just downloaded the crack from another place. but i dont see any difference w/ sp1
trl123x 4 years ago
active sky x makes a world of a difference
Garbage101 4 years ago
is that the ney fly tampa st maarten for fsx if it is can u tell me how u got it?
matthew1137 4 years ago
spec computer?
lehustler123 4 years ago
Gigabyte 965P DS3, Core 2 Duo E6400 overclocked at 3.2 GHz, ATI 1950 Pro, 2 Gigs of DDR2-800. FSX with SP1
mrburner2007 4 years ago
Wow awesome landing and great vid. It almost looks real. Well done!
flightsimrob 4 years ago
this FS X is almost real! that's cool
coair1952 4 years ago
ok! !
lehustler123 4 years ago
I dont have the panels and gauges in my airbus A340-300
lehustler123 4 years ago
You have to make some adjustments to the panel configuration. Search avsim or other FS Websites for a documentation on how to make Overland FS2004 planes FSX compatible, or if you want it the easy way i mail you my config.
mrburner2007 4 years ago
where you got the panels?
lehustler123 4 years ago
Panels are original Overland Airbus panels, or what do you mean ?
mrburner2007 4 years ago
O.O I live in Belleair Beach, right next to clearwater, i love Tampa! Didnt know they added so much in the addon around the airport. Xgraphics and Active Sky X are worth getting, but they have a heavy price tag for somehting you can go without
Rifrro 4 years ago
This video is not about the Tampa Airport. It´s about the landing of an Air France Airbus A340-300 at Princess Juliana Airport(TNCM, Netherland Antilles), which is a regular scheduled flight from Paris Charles De Gaulle Airport. The scenery used in FSX is from FlyTampa software company.
mrburner2007 4 years ago
very nice video! gave it 5 stars but how many fps did you get?
TK2506 4 years ago
FPS differ between 15 and 20 when flying without recording with Fraps. When i record the video with Fraps, the FPS reduces about 2-3 FPS, because Fraps uses some CPU time for it´s simple type of compression.
mrburner2007 4 years ago
ONE OF YOU TUBE'S BEST
CoCaptain 4 years ago
AWESOME! JUST AWESOME 10/5!
aat08 4 years ago
hey is this a340 professional?
lufthansaflightno195 4 years ago
No, i am not. I´m only doing a lot of Flightsimtraining. TNCM approaches are my favourite ones.
mrburner2007 4 years ago
This is possibly the best FSX vid ive seen, Ive just bought Active Sky and GFX and it makes a fantastic improvement to FSX.... This is a lovely vid mate...
andyrooo636 4 years ago
That sea looks nice. How much difference did you get between default and overclocked speeds? thanks.
JiggaJagga 4 years ago
The difference in terms of clockspeed is above 1 GHz, 2.13 compared to 3.2. It does have some impact, especially when your are running Aktive Sky X or other tools like FDC Live Cockpit X, FSC 8 etc. in the background. It should give some FPS, but i really didn´t test it out yet. I am also limited by my Graphics-Card which is an ATI 1950 Pro, and ATI Cards usually don´t do well in FSX. Nvidias are a lot better when counting FPS. So my next task is to buy an 8800 GTS and rework the video.
mrburner2007 4 years ago
Thanks mrburner2007. I was wondering how well the X1950 Pro scaled, but it's hard to tell with this title since it requires both CPU and GPU resources. Be interesting to see at what point it bottlenecks. It looks good on your system, but I agree that a Geforce 8800 GTS would be better..would you get the 320MB or the 640MB one?. Your PSU would be pulling a few amps as well, with that upgrade :)
JiggaJagga 4 years ago
Yes, it really requires a lot CPU and GPU power, and of course you need at least 2 Gigs of RAM, otherwise it´s almost unplayable.
My point is, that i always want to play FSX with 1280x1024, at highest settings and FSAA, including lens flare and light bloom which cost an aweful lot of gpu power.
I will try the 320MB GTS, which is about 100 Euros cheaper here in Germany than the 640MB version. I own a 450W BeQuiet Straight Power PSU. It should do the job with the GTS.
mrburner2007 4 years ago
i got a question, my laptops processor is an intel centrino duo @ 1.66ghz 1.67ghz, fsx runs smoothly on my pc but at mid-lows n lows i only got aircraft and scenary on high; but the case is would it make a difference if i overclock my processor, thou i dont even noe how, so how do u overclock a prossesor? is a laptop
trl123x 4 years ago
Very nice video!! Very good!
da070893 4 years ago
where did you download the scenery from princess juliana airport
fsxA321airbus 4 years ago
at the pirate bay torrent site !!! It is still not officially released by FlyTampa.
mrburner2007 4 years ago
Nice Video! Your Ram, processor, Video Card?
leop4rdo19 4 years ago
My system specs are in the Videoinfo, but here they are again:
Gigabyte 965P DS3, Core 2 Duo E6400 overclocked at 3.2 GHz, ATI 1950 Pro, 2 Gigs of DDR2-800. FSX nearly at full detail + 6 times Fullscale Antialasing.
mrburner2007 4 years ago