Added: 1 year ago
From: WhitneyTheGreatest
Views: 59,893
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (61)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • Did he kiss her at the start ?

  • It's not about it being too sexual, it's the fact that he was white and she was black. Many American's are still sensitive about this especially BM American's...You've only got to check out the negative stuff on here if you don't believe me. Interracial relationships are only ok if it's a BM with a WW

  • it's interesting that they played a deleted scene from the movie on TV

  • I believe they Really took this out because they were all over Kevin's behind about this scene. Well no matter, Mixed marriages are still happening.

  • @Bedeborah hell yea!!! lol 

  • WHITNEY HAD A LOOK LIKE OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO HE UNDRESSING ME LOL

  • @kwilcox1126 ikr!!!!! its dramatic but yet..its a lil funny... but with all respect R.I.P Whitney

  • @kwilcox1126 "oh reeeeeeeally, kevin costner? you realllyyyyy tryna take my stockings down all slow and sexy?!" LOL...okay well thats what i was thinking. but i loved this scene. i am bummed they cut the love scene out :/

  • AND IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII­IIIIIIIJA WILL ALWAYS LOVE YOU

  • Such a sensual scene...

  • Comment removed

  • Also i could live with Gosling and Beyonce. Or Alicia Keys or Michael Fassbender. Just please God not Rihanna!

  • I watched this scene before i realised that it was after the concert scene and honestly without that background info, she looks aroused. He looks like hes fighting his arousal by avoiding her gaze. In isolation of the preceding scene, its v hawt!

  • Kevin Costner is a WOMANISER. He cheated on his wife many times before finally divorcing. He went on to seduce a married woman before settling with a woman (now his wife) who is 20 years younger than him. He has 7 children with 3 different women! He got his own demons as well.

    Whitney wouldn't be better off with him.

  • @Comeflywithme101 i beg to differ

  • @Comeflywithme101 she would have been better off with kevin then bobby!! thats for sure!!

  • @JENNA4981 dont know , addicts tend to gravitate towards each other . in that she had a lot more in common with brown than with costner am not sure it would have worked because of her addictions

  • @Comeflywithme101 well that's your opinion but should i go on and say your allegations are unfounded.

  • @Comeflywithme101 ,

    as far is we know he never hit a woman, and didn't go to jail

    for not paying child support..and he's no junkie..!!!

  • @Piatequila amen!!

  • kevin, you can guard my body anytime.

    man, whitney and kevin had PASSION!

  • I think the Bodyguard could have been so more substantial and passionate...and this scene just proved it! I think the editing really affects the flow of the movie because when you watch the movie you don't really get why they fall in love. They should have kept it as passion/infatuation becuz as a love story it's not convincing.

  • I actually just read on line a new version of the DVD is being produced. It will be out soon.

  • @Pattyhughespjh OH MY GOSH. As long as they cast it correctly (I'm rooting for for Beyonce and Ryan Gosling... or some other male actor along those lines). But no matter what - the female casted needs to be able to do Whitney justice.

  • @noevoe978 im not sure about bey but amen for ryan gosling. id rather see someone like alicia keys in the role. then again, i dont think they should remake this film but it's interesting to see what possibilities we can come up with for roles!

  • @christentze I wouldn't mind Alicia. If they are intending to use the same songs from the original Alicia Keys might have some trouble delivering vocally, but she is an amazing talent, so I'd love to see her. But Gosling is a definite show in after seeing Drive.

  • @christentze ..They just announced a stage production with Heather Headley. Can't wait. Heather's voice is amazing.And she can act.

  • I think the studio might now release the DVD with added footage. If anyone finds it please let me know. I will also keep you posted. ( * ;

  • Kevin costner <3

  • THE SCENE DIDN'T 'FINISH', THERE WAS A LITTLE BIT MORE AFTER THE ENDING, MAINLY A SPEAKING PART WITH HER LETTING HIM KNOW, WHY SHE WAS BEHAVING IN SUCH AN AGGRESSIVE MANOR TOWARDS HIM AND OTHERS. I SO WISH THEY'D REDISTRIBUTE THE DIRECTORS CUT VERSION ONCE AGAIN.

  • @jebeja Where can we found that deleted scene? Thank you so much

  • they make such a cute couple they really should've gotten together.

  • @890tyra He was married. This is a movie.

  • There was a lot more cut out. Before this movie came out by chance I was at the Fallbrook Mall in West Hills, CA and walking past the movie theater. I was approached and asked to pre-screen a movie and fill out a questionnaire at the end. This was the only movie I ever saw this way. After Costner undresses her she stands up and turns her back and she's completely nude. The light from the bathroom behind her shines between legs and shows her entire junk. I couldn't believe it when I saw it.

  • @lilManDwight, Maybe that's why Costner wanted 'that' and other more "graphic" scenes (heavy kissing included) cut, mainly because he says it didn't fit or feel right with what the movie was really about. Also, the scene above has been cut as well, as it does go a little bit further here too, with more speaking parts to it.

  • Yes thhis scene is kind of sexy, but you can tell its not meant to be sexual. It definitely should've been kept in the movie.

  • THEY LOOKED LIKE THEY WERE LUSTIN 4 EACH OTHER BUT BOTH R MARRIED,

  • Rachel's face at 00:41 is CREEPY! You can tell she's really shook up by what happened at the club. I also noticed that she was moving her lips saying something but I dont know what. She may have been in a state of "Shock" but I've defintiley seen that look on people's faces before when something tramuatic happens!

  • Comment removed

  • Comment removed

  • Comment removed

  • Comment removed

  • raterroyale, Cmaster2007, I think you're right. Look closely at her face, she's still in SHOCK by what happended at the club they'd just left. She looks like sex is the 'last' thing on her mind at the moment, and I bet you he sensed that and didn't want to go there. Good for him. Don't know about the 'audience' reaction back then, but even I could tell sitting in the theatre that she wasn't go there at that moment.

  • @jebeja

    Yes jebeja, I agree. Now I will admit that Rachel was a LITTLE turned on by him undressing her (Hence why she asked him out on a date the next day) But for the most part she was not in the mood for any sexual activity and neither was Frank.They could barely look at each other and you could tell they were embarrased. I remember seeing this in the Movies with my family when I was 4 and the audience was definitley shocked! This one guy next to us felt bad for her.

  • @Cmaster2007 Such a dumb-ass. Why would you feel embarrassed for anybody who is acting. The notion behind all this was to portray that picture of a desperate woman. please don't display ya ignorance on YouTube. I feel so embarrassed for you just now. So STFU.

  • they must of had sometype of feelings 4 each other

  • Also I dont see what's so sexual about this. It was maybe sexual because of her outfit but from the looks on their faces NEITHER of them were in the mood for sex. He was trying to help her. You know it's bad when her eyes are moving back and forth scanning the room and she was talking to herself. That shows that she was so shooken up by the incident she wasnt in her right mind.I've seen that happen to many people before!

  • @Cmaster2007 jk? That girl wanted some dick dude.

  • @jimih64

    No she didnt! She couldnt even move so how did she want some dick? I'm telling you she was shook up and scared!

  • @Cmaster2007 It's got nothing to do with moving. It's all in the eyes.

    That girl wanted some fat dick bro.

  • @jimih64

    Naw TRUST me! Neither of them wanted to do anything. They were both just uncomfortable given the situation. Her eyes were moving like that because she couldnt believe what was going on.

  • @Cmaster2007 Naw dude trust ME. Both of them wanted to do something. They were both just horny given the situation. Her eyes were moving like that because she's hurtin' for a squirtin' from the hot meat injection.

  • @jimih64

    Naw they didnt. He could barely look at her. Especially at 1:21! And even at 1:58 when he's about to take her top off she moves her arms as to say that she doesnt want him to touch her. The audience had probably already done some "sexual" things to her which is why she was looking like that.

  • @CommentaryX

    No I think they should have left it in the movie! It was awkward but plenty of successful movies have awkward moments in them. Like raterroyale said this scene shows how shook up she was about the whole club incident. Alot of people think it's a joke to be passed around in a audience like she was but when they're trying to rip your clothes and hair apart and trying to hurt you. that's whne it gets serious. So I would have deleted some other things and kept this in there.

  • очень эротишно)) после подобных сцен становится понятнее, почему он в частности согласился на эту работу и почему все это привело к логическому развитию...

  • I think they should've kept this in the movie. It shows how shook up she really was about the whole incident at the club, and shows a bit more or the caring side of Frank's character, and that he understands he needs to do more than just keep Rachel from getting killed.

  • @raterroyale, the deleted scene is in the 'Director's Cut' version, which I'm trying very hard to find.

  • @jebeja please let me/us know if you do find it one day. I've been looking for it since 2004, and I'd think with the internet it'd be easy, but whoever has the director's cut (the director probably ha) has it under lock and key.

  • @raterroyale, I agree with you because when it was presented in the movie, it added credibility to the scene (editing it out makes absolutely NO sense). According to Costner about 15-20 minutes or maybe a little bit over were deleted drom the film (I so wish someone had the scenes). Thanks for posting. Maybe the 'Director's Cut' has the missing scenes??

  • @jebeja

    Yes this explains everything. In the original version they just show him putting her to sleep with the dolls and I was wondering if he undressed her, or maybe she undressed with him in the room in with her! I probably would've took out some of the other scenes and added this one to it!

  • @raterroyale

    I fully agree. It shows a lot of compassion on

    frank's part for Rachel after the incident. It was a tender moment that should have been left in.

Loading...
Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more