Response to 9/11 conspiracy theories about Wescam

[RochesterGT]

Are all you morons that think it was a controlled demolition doing it to just be part of some dumb ass group where you can circle jerk to bullshit stories about how thousands of American citizens died? You are all un-American and should not be allowed to continue being a part of this country.

[CNN911Fakes]

@RochesterGT says

"You are all un-American and should not be allowed to continue being a part of this country"

clearly a guy working on constituional issues; right up there with George, bill, george and barry, ah er, barack.

It clearly was not so controlled, they destroyed St. Nick's church and vaporized wtc4 when they brought down wtc2. See my featured video on wtc4.

[wedudoni]

dream on, jcannon87

[ahlf07]

what is the point of this video

[JZJYRWO]

Newton's laws of motion prove conspiracy.

[TribeOfGadIsraelite]

We Scam, read it, come on now

[rondlite]

the use of Wescam is not a conspiracy. Is just a fact.

[ChilloutSessionZ]

for anyone to say 911 is not a conspiracy is a complete fool who is ignorant and does not want to admit to themselves that our government will kill us and they will do it again.

[Montera15]

it was just a decal on the transmitter

[willease]

This is stupid. The videos on 911 clearly show the wescam and not a radio beacon.

[masztif]

hmm... this explains nothing to me...

[muckletoon]

The 911 WTC plane krash videos are faker than silicone tits.

[stbays]

@muckletoon

You're saying silicon tits don't exist? 0.0 Someone tell the media, all those women have gotten something else shoved in their chests!

Yes I know what you really meant, but you're ignoring all the witnesses and multiple live shots of the planes. The No Plane theory started on a lie and continued from there. You want to say the government blew up the buildings, that's your business, but try not denying the obvious truths ok? Take care.

[muckletoon]

@stbays

Only shills and low IQ monkeys still believe the cartoon physics on display in the videos of a plane supposedly hitting the WTC. The films of F175 depict lies and so do you, my friend.

[stbays]

@muckletoon

You forgot the third option. Clearly not everyone buys the CTs and for good reason. They aren't unified. There are so many completely different theories, it's hard to accept any of them. When the whole "Truth" movement gets behind a single theory, I'll be more willing to take it seriously.

BTW, no I'm not accepting your comment on my profile. Only open minded people get to post there.

[muckletoon]

@stbays

I know your site was a haven for major league shills.

[stbays]

@muckletoon

My profile is home to people who are on both sides of the debate. I just don't allow debatable comments on my profile. I consider these people open minded cause they haven't forced me to delete their comments.

For example, I am a Christian, however I do not allow pro or con religious comments on my profile.

[apocalypsynch]

Why does the background in *this* shot move corresp. w/ the movement of the chopper like ur shot does? Seems like a matter of "monkeycamming" (moving the view around later 2 sim. chopper movement) b/c right when the anchor sez, "a half hr ago", the view does move a little 4 the first time. How do we even know it's actual footage taken from a chopper & not some Future Combat Systems technology? (FCS does allow cityscapes to be rendered in real time)

watch?v=1NF8cxyccdM

[gidsum29]

Its only "obvious" to individuals with less than average intelligents . You cant solve this one with Saturday morning cartoons or common sense DUMBFUCK! Its called MOMENTUM!

[p12wxyz]

not to mention far too much time on their hands the disrespectful cocks!

[kaferere]

gidsum, "intelligents" ! ! ? !LOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOL­OLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOL No, I can't stop! HAAAAAAHAAAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA! I'm surprised you didn't say "It's called MOMENTOS"!!! HAAAAHAAAAAHAHAHAHAHAHA! Who's been watching cartoons gidsum? Guess that's where you "larnded Inglish,HYUK_YUK_YUK!

[gidsum29]

The best argument for a conspiracy asshole is "spelling lessons". WEAK!!!!!

[kaferere]

@gidsum29, On the contrary, it's a perfect argument against people like yourself. Your comment was accusing truth seekers of being of low intelligence, the implication being that you are of higher intelligence, but you laughingly expose yourself as having little intelligence because in fact you neither know how to spell "intelligence" nor pronounce it. For the record, that's called "irony". With such a low attention to detail, is it any wonder you believe the official conspiracy? Again, LOL.

[gidsum29]

Sure.......Star Treks on at 11 dipshit. My point was that it would be nice if you took some physics lessons...I see you got the spelling covered. NEXT!!

[kaferere]

gidsum29, Given that Star Trek is fiction supported by computer graphics, I would've thought that it would be rather suited to your tastes not mine as it has a lot in common with the official conspiracy nonsense. You do realize that Mr. Spock isn't really a Vulcan don't you? Oh you don't! Sorry to break it to you but his ears aren't real either. Interesting that you know what time it's on though. I wouldn't have been able to tell you. BTW you missed an apostrophe, "Star Trek's on....." See? LOL.

[gidsum29]

@kaferere I think it's "Ironic" that you notice such simple things(like apostrophes) but can swallow the obvious FACT that there are a such thing as terrorists. Planes have been hijacked for decades dipshit. Did Uncle Sam do those too; or do a shit load of people have to die to get the conspiracy idiots fired-up? Go back to the grassy knoll weirdo. So which one of the "made-up" storys do you believe in?

[kaferere]

@gidsum29, go back to sleep sweetheart, everything's going to be alright. Eat another bigmac, drink another coke, put your thrash metal cd on, open your superman comic, shhhh, It's all going to be fine. Night-night.

[Oz1976]

@OFthePeople yes...controlled demo....the twin towers fell like NO OTHER CONTROLLED DEMO EVER. Controlled demos fall out from the bottom up, blowing out the floors upwards with the top floor collapsing last...clearly this is how the twin towers fell right? Idiot.

[RasgaSaias]

If you look closer you'll see that this isn't as stable as it was in the 9/11 footage. Maybe they had less turbulence then.

[YougeneDebs]

Thanks for this! You might be the person I've been looking for.

64-dollar Q:

Could a Wescam, circa 2001, zoom in so close on an object that is 12 miles away and get it so close that you could read the graffiti on it?

Please conduct this experiment: hover over 59th Street and 9th Avenue (or so) NYC and try to "pull" in the Varrazano-Narrows Bridge. Bonus points will be awarded for framing a bridge pillar with the Liberty Plaza building on the left and the new Liberty Tower on the right.

[RasgaSaias]

That I would like to see!

[FreqBand]

Yes, you can see the power of a zoom here.

?v=cKxkWpnGatA

Not sure if it's a wescam though.

=FB

[YougeneDebs]

Thanks for trying, but that didn't look like 12 miles from camera to car. How far apart were they? 5 miles?

We're looking 12 miles of distance between the camera and object.

I really really really appreciate your efforts in this matter.

Thanks!!!

[NaturalThreat1]

balls

[FreqBand]

Are you referring to a certain video that shows graffiti on the bridge ?

[YougeneDebs]

You saw some grafitti, too? I'm kidding. But, yes. I'm refering to any TV footage that zoomed in on the bridge pillars from 12 miles away and brought them up close and personal. Do you know of any 12-mile zoom shots? Thanks again!

[NLoog]

watch?v=-YX5AQK1BAM

[g4sy]

Just the link on the helicopter? Uh I see no similarity between your video and the one you responded to.

[PollenB]

Conspiracy? What Conspiracy? The one about a man with a beard in a cave in Afghanistan? Thats the only conspiracy Im aware of.

h t t p : // video . google . co . uk / videoplay?docid=80455423876724­51515&hl=en-GB