Que mierda su "cover", ahi es cuando la guitarra se vuelve descarada.../you suck... it´s sound horrible... i´m pianist, and a composer, the guitar doesn´t fits at all in this song, plus before you try to make some "chages" in a song, you should make a little research of who is Glass, and whats the meaning of this song, an then your interpretacion.
This was REALLY great and thank you for posting. I am also a guitarist and recently i have been composing songs on my classical acoustic using inspirations from Philip Glass and it is working quite well. I may post them soon when (and if ever) I finish. Thanks again for posting.
LOOK DUDE DONT LISTEN TO WHAT PEOPLE SAY THEY DONT KNOW THE BEAUTY OF A GUITAR THEY ARENT MUSICIANS THEY DONT UNDERSTAND I THOGUHT THIS WAS FUCKIN AWSOME DUDE.DID YOU USE SCALES OR JUST MESSED AROUND?U HAVE A TALENT THE SONG WAS MISSING SOMETHING AND THIS IS IT
Wow people are jerks haha. Well I have to say its pretty sweet. I play guitar as well, hell I play heavy metal music and I listen and enjoy Philip Glass. Seeing and hearing this is an awesome mix.
Seems people can't accept other's tastes so easily =/
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
tasteless. you don't understand this music and you turned something beautiful into something wretched. don't go around adding shitty guitar parts to pieces that are already perfect and complete.
@yougonndie what a fucking dick! what do you know about music?! it is great to experiment and improvise with different things, it can only improve your musicianship. perfection is a concept so ridiculous to apply to art it does not surprise me you also use the word tasteless. taste is relative, but you are an absolute asshole.
Very cool. As far as the comment, "Contrary to popular ..." goes, I have to disagree. Minimalism is routed strongly in a "Marxist" effort to combat the musical elite of the time. One reason why Glass' solo piano work is so easy to play is because it is meant to be played by people of all skill levels. It brings the music to people of all backgrounds. And just like Riley's "In C," the communal element of improvisation is very strong. This type of project fits the bill well.
Contrary to popular approval, i do not like the guitar arrangement, specially considering the theory behind glass' music. Please, do not attempt to make another glass song with these kind of arrangements.
Beautiful.. Love the mix of guitar and piano. The tone of the guitar is perfect. Don't listen to the purists. It sounds great as it is. It would really sound great if it were really put on tracks and mixed. Maybe it is a little repetitious but that's the nature of the song anyway. The tone sounds like something the Scorpions used on the Animal Magnetism album.
man... i give you credit for liking glass, but to turn it in to a bunch of cheese, i slapped my forehead? somethings you just cant mix. it just reminded me of 80's power ballads. sorry bro.
Contrary to what most say. I can see you have great phrasing techniques. It is the slower tempo music that is more difficult to put feeling into and you do it well. listen to Nigel Kennedy play Bach 1041 part two. Kennedy has an amazing ability to put so much life into slow melodies, as do you.
This is a great solo. But it's not the opening to Glassworks, as you advertised, so I have to rate you down. Sorry, mate. 2 stars, and only that because you know how to choose some notes.
I think I would have liked this better if I hadn't heard the original before. The guitar is nice, but I think it would fit the song better if that part was put on strings. Also, you should get a more ambient tone: more reverb/delay, less gain. And add more vibrato to your held bends.
I was expecting a tasteful finger pick of the original. You have good technique but a big distorted solo over this piece makes it sound really cheesey.
i like the electronic addition...but i don't like the tone of the guitar. you need a less focused tone...a more ambient one. good taste in music though :)
No way, this is awesome. These naysayers remind me of armchair writing group critics who are more concerned with "proper" style rather than purpose or what the art evokes. That being said, I don't believe that it defeats the "minimalist" purpose either, it doubles the effect of simplicity in that the guitar complements the piano and enhances the lonely emotional beauty of Glass's piano piece.
I don't think so. The electric guitar just sounds loud and obnoxious next to this soft piece. The two instruments are typically used to convey such different emotions. I can definitely see this being done with a similar song, just not this one.
Well, that's a matter of opinion. Seems like a lot of people do like this. I would say that perhaps he departs from the style of the original, like turning folk into country, (yech), and we like the new style while "traditionalists" don't. Hey, maybe alexstrat can claim a new style! In any case, I think it's a matter of taste. I do like the original version very much, so maybe the style theory doesn't hold water? Heavy metal has its own beauty as well, and perhaps this has the same issue.
I appreciate experimenting, but I do agree that soloing on a highly conspicuous guitar sound is antithetical to the entire point Mr. Glass's subtle minimalism. A gentle ebow may have been nice. I was really hoping to hear something fingerstyle, oh well.
Siebenkaas, what were you expecting? A techno remix? This is one man's guitar rendition of the original piece - which, if you listen closely - is a very mellow piece. Therefore, it's not going to be something with 80 beats per minute. I think this particular version is done exceedingly well, and managed to honor Glass's original piece as well.
well, maybe that's the point that i didn't expect anything, i know glass's concert for violin and like it, keep it in honour, let's say; but this here sounds like parts of "i'll send all my loving to you" used in the worst spaghetti movie soundtrack i've ever heard (and the movie would probably show a cactus growing there for a 100 min), and thats why i fall asleep. sooorryy, can't help it. i'll go and have a look how the original was - ahm - meant
I think this is a really nice accompaniment to the piano piece. It's almost like a combination of the almost mathematical (but still beautiful) piano by Glass and the extremely emotional guitar solo "Watermelon in Easter Hay" by Frank Zappa.
You know what would really impress me? If you arranged this piece for solo guitar...maybe on a nylon string...let me know if you are up for the challenge. Scott
Piñatón compadre. There´s no need for this. Sorry I didn´t like it. Probably the guitar alone, without the piano (an enriched version)... Yes, I´m sure it works better. But not this way. Anyway, it´s a nice try and a proof that you love this great music.
Your tone is great and you play with a good sense of touch, similar to Andrew Latimer from the band Camel. You shouldn't waste time with Glass though. His composing is overly fluffed-up bullshit and even a ton of awesome guitar-playing couldn't save the piece from being boring and trite.
i'v listened through this vid a few times and still i cannot find any homosexual content (or other sexual content for that matter). have a misunderstood you ? I am REALLY cOnFuSeD by guitar terminology... i find words such as:
"masturbatory"; "shread"or "shred"; "palyer dum bass"
and now "gay" Guitar ppl seem to have a secret language... it intrugues me ! please .... what does "gay" mean in this context and be glad of yr help with the other words too.
This is really pretty - but I'd have the guitar in the background with the piano being the main feature instead of the other way around, if you plan on making future recordings. Good job!
doesn't really matter how much distortion he has because it just how he sees the song...that's whats great about music it can be seen however you want.
use more technical skill!!!
TheAsianNetwrok 6 months ago
Que mierda su "cover", ahi es cuando la guitarra se vuelve descarada.../you suck... it´s sound horrible... i´m pianist, and a composer, the guitar doesn´t fits at all in this song, plus before you try to make some "chages" in a song, you should make a little research of who is Glass, and whats the meaning of this song, an then your interpretacion.
julipidupi 6 months ago
This was REALLY great and thank you for posting. I am also a guitarist and recently i have been composing songs on my classical acoustic using inspirations from Philip Glass and it is working quite well. I may post them soon when (and if ever) I finish. Thanks again for posting.
NoobOnTheCob 6 months ago 2
Fantastic ! Very very beautifull! Congratulations!
wagl10 9 months ago
very well worked, hard to get the sound 100% correct, but you aced it!
setabnareik 10 months ago
you just btecced a perfectly good song :(
scratchcardlottery 11 months ago
this is what philip glass is for. accompanying a solo musician.
musicman9897 1 year ago
LOOK DUDE DONT LISTEN TO WHAT PEOPLE SAY THEY DONT KNOW THE BEAUTY OF A GUITAR THEY ARENT MUSICIANS THEY DONT UNDERSTAND I THOGUHT THIS WAS FUCKIN AWSOME DUDE.DID YOU USE SCALES OR JUST MESSED AROUND?U HAVE A TALENT THE SONG WAS MISSING SOMETHING AND THIS IS IT
DarkDietyLink 1 year ago
Wow people are jerks haha. Well I have to say its pretty sweet. I play guitar as well, hell I play heavy metal music and I listen and enjoy Philip Glass. Seeing and hearing this is an awesome mix.
Seems people can't accept other's tastes so easily =/
MrJackoL 1 year ago 2
This is absolutely terrible. Never do this again.
attentat1986 1 year ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
tasteless. you don't understand this music and you turned something beautiful into something wretched. don't go around adding shitty guitar parts to pieces that are already perfect and complete.
yougonndie 1 year ago
@yougonndie what a fucking dick! what do you know about music?! it is great to experiment and improvise with different things, it can only improve your musicianship. perfection is a concept so ridiculous to apply to art it does not surprise me you also use the word tasteless. taste is relative, but you are an absolute asshole.
Ariel799 1 year ago 3
Very good. I am sure Mr Glass would love this!
witpikkewyn 1 year ago
nice guitar! very good playing! listed the whole song, thats a good thing;) peace up
Rodney1985 1 year ago
Very cool. As far as the comment, "Contrary to popular ..." goes, I have to disagree. Minimalism is routed strongly in a "Marxist" effort to combat the musical elite of the time. One reason why Glass' solo piano work is so easy to play is because it is meant to be played by people of all skill levels. It brings the music to people of all backgrounds. And just like Riley's "In C," the communal element of improvisation is very strong. This type of project fits the bill well.
ChastainProductions 1 year ago
Contrary to popular approval, i do not like the guitar arrangement, specially considering the theory behind glass' music. Please, do not attempt to make another glass song with these kind of arrangements.
Razorgabo 1 year ago
hey really good version dude!! of this good song!
gzayas145522 1 year ago
PROFOUNDLY BEAUTIFUL! IF YOU SOLD THIS SINGLE IN A RECORD SHOP I WOULD BY IT!! YOU ARE VERY TALENTED... FANTASTIC..
beatifullady100 1 year ago
Amazingly beautiful! Bravo!
janineroux 1 year ago 4
wow that really added to the song
NerdFury 1 year ago 3
Very nice with the guitar.... listen to mine at the piano...
Philipianistemaurice 1 year ago
Omg....awsome. 5 stars from me too :)
mof67 1 year ago 3
BEAUTIFUL!!!
KRISTY1000CYBORG 1 year ago
Nice but you could reduce a little the treble in your amplifier.
It needs to sound a little smoother :P
Other than that, 5 stars to you =)
caralhosvosfodam 1 year ago
Reminds me of Pink Floyd.
JimmyAGIV 2 years ago 2
This sounds really pretty :) Don't listen to the people saying you ruined it; they're just philistines :)
AnimeGirl375 2 years ago
I love it. It's beautiful. Works very well with the original recording.
BiNate82 2 years ago
Beautiful.. Love the mix of guitar and piano. The tone of the guitar is perfect. Don't listen to the purists. It sounds great as it is. It would really sound great if it were really put on tracks and mixed. Maybe it is a little repetitious but that's the nature of the song anyway. The tone sounds like something the Scorpions used on the Animal Magnetism album.
Cruezz 2 years ago
man... i give you credit for liking glass, but to turn it in to a bunch of cheese, i slapped my forehead? somethings you just cant mix. it just reminded me of 80's power ballads. sorry bro.
scottryjones 2 years ago
Contrary to what most say. I can see you have great phrasing techniques. It is the slower tempo music that is more difficult to put feeling into and you do it well. listen to Nigel Kennedy play Bach 1041 part two. Kennedy has an amazing ability to put so much life into slow melodies, as do you.
bristolblueglasssw 2 years ago 3
I agree. I not a music expert but I appreciate people trying new ideas and experimenting.
bhfabe 2 years ago 13
this sucks.
Razorgabo 2 years ago
wow playing root notes over a genius work what the fuck give up music forever thanks in advance
totlolrofl 2 years ago
Make it stop!!!!!!!!!
urbanmagik 2 years ago 14
shit as hell. Sorry but sometimes some melodies do not fit to another.
daweon 2 years ago
This is a great solo. But it's not the opening to Glassworks, as you advertised, so I have to rate you down. Sorry, mate. 2 stars, and only that because you know how to choose some notes.
slackbassist 2 years ago 3
You just took a solo (a particularly boring one too) over the piece, I'm REALLY disappointed. I was expecting some cool finger-picking too.
MarvelousMatthewWut 2 years ago
hey man, if you'd like to see this piece fingerpicked on guitar, please check my video!
mathijsgitaar 2 years ago
It's like being served Pink Floyd over Glass.
johnnowa1953 2 years ago 2
A conventional guitar player that doesn't know anything else that add distor and a lead. You need to try harder. A beautiful song.
rodrigo3hm 2 years ago
I think I would have liked this better if I hadn't heard the original before. The guitar is nice, but I think it would fit the song better if that part was put on strings. Also, you should get a more ambient tone: more reverb/delay, less gain. And add more vibrato to your held bends.
Overall, very good!
pharamund 2 years ago
I was expecting a tasteful finger pick of the original. You have good technique but a big distorted solo over this piece makes it sound really cheesey.
dpollock 2 years ago 3
Nice work.
FalconPunched2012 2 years ago
Perfectly haunting...
brendantellsall 2 years ago
me parecio excelente!
ganesha59 2 years ago
i like the electronic addition...but i don't like the tone of the guitar. you need a less focused tone...a more ambient one. good taste in music though :)
StringQuartetFan 2 years ago 2
guitar player point of view, nice well done, dunno bout the minimalist side coz i only just started it for my GCSE.
ScaredWarble 2 years ago
No way, this is awesome. These naysayers remind me of armchair writing group critics who are more concerned with "proper" style rather than purpose or what the art evokes. That being said, I don't believe that it defeats the "minimalist" purpose either, it doubles the effect of simplicity in that the guitar complements the piano and enhances the lonely emotional beauty of Glass's piano piece.
ijzerkoekie 2 years ago 2
I don't think so. The electric guitar just sounds loud and obnoxious next to this soft piece. The two instruments are typically used to convey such different emotions. I can definitely see this being done with a similar song, just not this one.
padaalsa 2 years ago
Well, that's a matter of opinion. Seems like a lot of people do like this. I would say that perhaps he departs from the style of the original, like turning folk into country, (yech), and we like the new style while "traditionalists" don't. Hey, maybe alexstrat can claim a new style! In any case, I think it's a matter of taste. I do like the original version very much, so maybe the style theory doesn't hold water? Heavy metal has its own beauty as well, and perhaps this has the same issue.
ijzerkoekie 2 years ago
The contrast is what makes it so good. It's unexpected and conveys mixed feelings.
FalconPunched2012 2 years ago
autsch
Tungstenium74 2 years ago
sorry, but this defeats the purpose of the art
freshhh1994 2 years ago
Comment removed
DaveDobbsJr 2 years ago
wtf... oh no...
you should make this to a song of hans zimmer - but NOT to a arrangement of philip glass...
dont like it, sorry dude..
tonileibham 2 years ago
It's really good!
Well done!
5 stars
sp0k1ng 2 years ago 4
I appreciate experimenting, but I do agree that soloing on a highly conspicuous guitar sound is antithetical to the entire point Mr. Glass's subtle minimalism. A gentle ebow may have been nice. I was really hoping to hear something fingerstyle, oh well.
moonlitesymphony 2 years ago
I like the execution, but the idea makes Philip Glass' pointless.
reinwoerstz 2 years ago
great, i love it!
craven75 2 years ago
guitar gives really interesting harmony in this version. I like it!!
Ninotchka14 3 years ago
I prefer Philip Glass originals. But is quite well
Jeschumacher 3 years ago
This Piece Does Not Need Noise Vomit. You've created a monster...
blix000 3 years ago 4
haha noise vomit
but i like it
iamthedirector 3 years ago
Beautiful.
CrackSnortingSailor 3 years ago
congratulations, the tab please?
mayestick 3 years ago
enio morricone ?
Zio86tobia 3 years ago
adiós nonino!!!
adiós no-ni-nooooo...
temo lo que pueda suceder si sigo mirando a este tipito arruinar una pieza de Glass...
genitival 3 years ago
beautiful!
i love the piano version a lot.. and your version is nearly better :D
great! <3
DaLlLY69 3 years ago
very good!
it's simple, yet powerful
i like it :D
glokc19 3 years ago 3
i agree!
RJDR444 3 years ago
yeah, i feel like: glass didn't mean this piece of music to be a desert for a 1000-years-slow-motion growing of an almost electric cactus
siebenkaas 3 years ago
i like music, but this is more boring than being dead
siebenkaas 3 years ago
Siebenkaas, what were you expecting? A techno remix? This is one man's guitar rendition of the original piece - which, if you listen closely - is a very mellow piece. Therefore, it's not going to be something with 80 beats per minute. I think this particular version is done exceedingly well, and managed to honor Glass's original piece as well.
Teressa1981 3 years ago
well, maybe that's the point that i didn't expect anything, i know glass's concert for violin and like it, keep it in honour, let's say; but this here sounds like parts of "i'll send all my loving to you" used in the worst spaghetti movie soundtrack i've ever heard (and the movie would probably show a cactus growing there for a 100 min), and thats why i fall asleep. sooorryy, can't help it. i'll go and have a look how the original was - ahm - meant
siebenkaas 3 years ago
interesting :)
chubbaustralia 3 years ago
interesting :)
chubbaustralia 3 years ago
this makes me wish, that Mike Oldfield had done some more stuff of Glass'(apart from North Star)!
mauki1111 3 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
this is absolutely shite! 0 points to you for zero effort. Work harder
clubsandwedge 3 years ago
I think this is a really nice accompaniment to the piano piece. It's almost like a combination of the almost mathematical (but still beautiful) piano by Glass and the extremely emotional guitar solo "Watermelon in Easter Hay" by Frank Zappa.
Excellent job. =)
adoblivione 3 years ago
Great work! Do you know of any guitar books that show you how to play this kind of music on guitar?
oscarfuentes1988 3 years ago
magnifique... tu la jouera devant moi *-*
kisss
Sophiadk 3 years ago
You know what would really impress me? If you arranged this piece for solo guitar...maybe on a nylon string...let me know if you are up for the challenge. Scott
souellette22 3 years ago
All the harmonies are either (stolen) from Opening or if not they are those worn harmonies one can find in any boring pop song.
petrisz 3 years ago
bad bad bad, is not Opening, is a very bad guitar noise.
jpkinkanetjp 3 years ago 3
Piñatón compadre. There´s no need for this. Sorry I didn´t like it. Probably the guitar alone, without the piano (an enriched version)... Yes, I´m sure it works better. But not this way. Anyway, it´s a nice try and a proof that you love this great music.
BPLince 3 years ago
Häh? *Homosexual content*? If someone WANTS to see any sexual content it WILL find it (and the other way round) - it's that easy, guys! ;-)
Sterndi1 3 years ago
5☆5☆5☆5☆5☆tars from: smi-ren-ger!.
smirenger 3 years ago
Your tone is great and you play with a good sense of touch, similar to Andrew Latimer from the band Camel. You shouldn't waste time with Glass though. His composing is overly fluffed-up bullshit and even a ton of awesome guitar-playing couldn't save the piece from being boring and trite.
cleomagoolando 3 years ago
nonsense
shisha86 3 years ago 2
I disagree with the composing comment, i don't think his music is boring... just repetitious, which isn't bad...
witmachine 3 years ago 2
It really is so very beautiful, I was kind of amazed that it worked so well. I'd love to see you do some more Philip Glass.
tonyirwin50 3 years ago
Thank you so much, I will try some others ;-)
alexstrat 3 years ago
@alexstrat pfff
Regulateur1982 1 year ago
This is incredible. I wish more people would make music like this.
Teressa1981 3 years ago
very beautiful..
gabriela3forgues 3 years ago
Beautiful.
gtgtclolmwah 3 years ago
Man. I'm a violin player, but this makes me want to go out and learn the guitar!
AliceMoving 3 years ago
check out my how not to move a piano vid i think you will like it
ronaldsmusicfactory 3 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
gay
Fisherdec 4 years ago
Fisherdec
i'v listened through this vid a few times and still i cannot find any homosexual content (or other sexual content for that matter). have a misunderstood you ? I am REALLY cOnFuSeD by guitar terminology... i find words such as:
"masturbatory"; "shread"or "shred"; "palyer dum bass"
and now "gay" Guitar ppl seem to have a secret language... it intrugues me ! please .... what does "gay" mean in this context and be glad of yr help with the other words too.
robbie
xx
sirheadmaster 3 years ago 4
Very nice. Now I want to try myself. But damn, have two midterms tomorrow.
LesPaulProgRocker 4 years ago
Nice job ;)
TuRuRuTuTu 4 years ago
this is so fucking badass -- loved it. but agree with the one who said the guitar should be background, with piano up louder
Necrosorrow 4 years ago
wow! this is beautiful...
Aliszja85 4 years ago
This is really pretty - but I'd have the guitar in the background with the piano being the main feature instead of the other way around, if you plan on making future recordings. Good job!
takeodoi 4 years ago
what do you use for equipment?
pontiuspd 4 years ago
Amp: Line 6 Spider II 112
Guitar: Les Paul Copy with Seymour Duncan Alnico Pro II
;-)
alexstrat 4 years ago
This is brilliant. I'd love to hear this cleanly recorded. Excellent work!
steph1971 4 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Verry good job, 5 stars!
Rodney1985 4 years ago 2
Very cool man! i dig this, 5 starz!
ebealienhead 4 years ago
Less distortion please. It overpowers the piano.
zakkilhoffer 4 years ago
doesn't really matter how much distortion he has because it just how he sees the song...that's whats great about music it can be seen however you want.
alecbc9 4 years ago
precise and understated.. i liked it.. :)
goforkt 4 years ago
Mooi man! En mooie gitaar ook!
Tjoppy 4 years ago