Added: 3 years ago
From: hcflyeaglejet
Views: 74,368
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (34)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • this video made my clitoris come out of its clitoral hood

  • Did you make them from scratch or buy them?

  • this is clearly gonna be an f 15 :)

  • Looks heavy. What's the weight?

  • that shit slap

  • That shit make BOOM !!!

  • this must be the technology that the russians copied off of.... lol

  • My nipples just got hard!

  • try usting kinked feathers of spring steel around the nozzle for that "authentic" look. that'd be really cool!

  • Indigenous! 

  • Those look like the rig from Dreamworks Model Products. is that right?

  • THRUST VECTORING OWNS THE SKY!!!

  • @zzztubazzz how about you get a life you fucking moron

  • That's sooooooo fuckin' WIN it's ridiculous. Is it gonna be EDF or Turbine?

  • Is it a model of F-15 project?

  • How'd you accomplish that... gimbles?

  • What advantage would be gained my making the nozzle diameter dynamically change as in the real OVT?

  • @allroudnpower : the same advantage as on the real OVT...controlling the exhaust and the thrust more efficiently.

  • @allroundpower

    Controlling the diameter of the nozzle allows better efficiency at low engine power. At low power, a smaller nozzle provides better efficiency than a wide open nozzle. Air/thrust passes through quicker than a wide open one (same concept of blowing through a small hole versus a larger one--smaller hole means air moves faster) but at high engine output, you open it wide because it would cause a bottleneck otherwise.

  • @rpenri agreed . But if you look carefully the diameter of the nozzle is fixed. No variation. It only changes the direction regarding form the original axis of the plane. It could only help when doing some aerobatics where some operations can't be done only by the airfoil profile and the thrust.

  • @princeigorash

    What? You realize that I answered a kid's question, and not commenting on the video in general, right? And FYI, I already know the principle and physics behind OVT...no need to educate someone who isn't even asking why.

  • @rpenri LoL why you need to be so hostile . It was just an observation . I didn't mean to anger you . :((

  • nice work

    hmm is that RC using a real jet ?

  • Is it gonna be an R/C F-15 ACTIVE?

  • Holy thrust vector batman

  • Bahaha

    Nice man

  • @64thAggressors @b101aa2 It is sad for Israel that the proponents of the Lavi rejected my un-detailed early 1987 proposal to add 3D vectoring to the Lavi, claiming that 3D-post-stall agility & maximized take-off/landing/flight-agilit­y-safety & recovery is none-sense even after my 1st in aviation history flight tests of STVS (with 3D vectoring). [May 18, 1987 by Aviation Week. Facebook cite ["Benjamin Gal-Or"]. Their rejection failed the Lavi future, at least.

  • I want to see it in action! good luck with this project!

  • how about the roll?

  • Comment removed

  • awesome!

  • can you possibly make a propeller vesrion of that?

    also, if you know anything about making a twin brushless motor plane can you make me a diagram? nice vid :-D !!!!

Loading...
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more