Sukhoi T-50 PAK-FA Shooting missile air to air (must see)

[aviakurs]

fake

[calripson]

As long as Russia can drop a tactical nuke from an Iskander or a strategic nuke from a Topol on the airbase where all those gee whiz F-22s eventually have to land, they don't in the ultimate sense add up to ****.

[alleksart]

красивый мультик, только шлейф ракеты всё испортил)) и вернул в реальность))

[YaHuyeyuNna]

But the news is the combat suite including missiles for PAKFA is on schedule and will be completed/ready by 2014

[YaHuyeyuNna]

It's not fake it is CGI quite obviously. Russians would not reveal footage like this unless you are Indian DRDO

[luckyStrike89ru]

FAAAAKE.

[bujoun76]

Very nice CG work! The only "giveaway" was the smoke from the missile.

[nimaside]

That looks pretty realistic. Nice job.

[rikrdolevy]

is that a brahmos missile?

[Hatinonthehaters]

Great graphics

[xalekcey]

Aerodynamics laws one for all. Therefore similarity. Russia № 1 in the world. Russia will save this world. Which now malicious, bloody and false. If it is necessary. Why when to whom that is bad, he asks the help from Russia? Instead of at America. Because the USA-devils. Russia-angel. And planes at them beautiful as angels.

[triplepogi2009]

Must've fired the EW-1 Trinity... (Ace Combat Assault Horizon reference lol)

[sergeikozin47]

russian jets are ugly, but very tough and powerful

half the price, twice the power.

[mrvishal1000]

@sergeikozin47 dude the f 16 eurofighter, f 15 looks very nimble, and ugly.... just look at mig 25, mig 31, su 30 , su 27 , su 35, su 47 they look so beautiful... (and only the f 22 f35 sr 71 are beautiful like them)

[zero48411]

fake.

[tommo1307]

Probably good aircraft but I'am waiting for Mikoyan to make a move.

[xero993]

@tommo1307 They won't be making any - plans for a light 5th generation fighter (like an F-16/F-35 if the PAK FA was Russia's F-15/F-22) were cancelled a few years ago.

[Mig42MFI]

Fake,100%

[SAMTOMAS]

@gunguy702 its very beautiful aircraft.live with it

[gunguy702]

@SAMTOMAS still looks ugly

[Hatinonthehaters]

@gunguy702 ROFL you're such a fucking hater hahahahha. eat a dick.

[gunguy702]

@Hatinonthehaters i dont think you were "rolling on the floor laughing" at me.Read and look up some stuff and youll understand things a bit more.

[Schrodingerscatnip]

@gunguy702 you're kidding right? this thing looks awesome!

[gunguy702]

@Schrodingerscatnip question,where are the weapons bays?

[Iggy82xl]

@gunguy702

Between the engines?

[gunguy702]

@Iggy82xl not enough space.my guess is that it can carry 2 missles in the intakes.so much for weapons.

[Iggy82xl]

@gunguy702

It can cary 4 medium range missiles in the bay between the engine. There is speculation that the two blisters at the root of the wings are bays for 1 short range missile each.

[gunguy702]

@Iggy82xl then were does the heavy radio and avionics go?then were does the fuel go?this is not a very good design.Unless they have created stealth pylons,bombs,and missile.then,in that case,these 5th generation designs are much more deadly than we civilians think.

[Iggy82xl]

@gunguy702 You are asking questions that you can answer for yourself by googling PAK-FA images. While most of them are speculations, some of them are very sound,

In case you're bored, I can give a gist of it: avionics (as in most planes) are in the neck/cockpit area, one huge fuel tank is in the back part of the neck, between the engine intakes, fuel in other places is all over the plane, in wings, between engines and weapons bays (PAK-FA has 4 of those btw), etc...

[gunguy702]

@Iggy82xl ahh i see thank you.

[RDD756]

i dont wanna sound like a nerd but.. its the same color as the one in assault horizon and i like it for that :D

[kertaspaper94]

@RDD756 Its the other way around.

[RDD756]

@kertaspaper94 haha yeah i know.

[SAMTOMAS]

@warhead2121 F50, a high-performance adidas football shoe

[SubZero1703]

@warhead2121 ROFL!

[Dassaulteam]

It's a very beautiful fake ^^

[Shadowthedgehog1]

@Dassaulteam LOL they let America waste a fortune on stealth aircraft design, and then copy it for themselves. The USAF should have kept their F-22 secret and let eyewitnesses believe those are aliens

[Dassaulteam]

@Shadowthedgehog1

T50 it's not a copy of F22. Stealth planes are the same design

[Shadowthedgehog1]

@Dassaulteam Yeah, but the ones who discovered that design were the Americans. I know there's more to it than just the fuselage shape, but it's somewhat likea shortcut.

[parapobabam]

@Shadowthedgehog1 "In the 1970s, a key piece of the stealth formula emerged when the Americans discovered an obscure 20-year-old scientific paper by Pyotr Ufimtsev, a Russian scientist who had proposed reducing RCS by building an aircraft with flat surfaces and irregular angles, rather than the usual aerodynamically streamlined profile." educate yourself.

[Shadowthedgehog1]

@parapobabam That's about what I was told by someone I had an argument with earlier - only, he said it was Nazi Germany and not the U.S.

Go argue about it with the other "educators" - the Russians, British, Neo-Nazis, the dinosaurs, whoever you want. I'm fine with knowing only what I see (I saw the United States constructing stealth fighters first, while others didn't care for the idea - that's enough for me)

[eyeAMtwinkEE]

@parapobabam And later on, when Pyotr moved to the states and was confronted with the American fruits of his studies from the 70's, Ufimtsev stated he knew the capabilities, bu the Soviets ignored him. You still have to credit the US for stealth technology, sorry.

[parapobabam]

@eyeAMtwinkEE why are you sorry? they chose not to develop stealth, knowing that it would be hugely expensive and ultimately a failure. stealth can be detected with 70s radars. there is a reason why america doesn't attack technologically advanced countries.

[eyeAMtwinkEE]

@parapobabam Maybe at extremely close ranges. According to the Russian Ministry of Defense the S-300 can't even detect the F-22 until about 24km out, let alone engage the F-22. The S-400, about 98km. Keep in mind most of the F-22's munitions can be deployed at 3-4x that range, stealth is vital. American hasn't attacked technologically advanced nations because most technologically advanced nations don't provide a good reason to attack them.

[iviciaable]

@eyeAMtwinkEE Wow..where did you get these classified numbers about S-300 and S-400 !? :)) Eurofighter Typhoon which have mid power PESA radar made a lock on F-22 at more then 40 km in one of the exercises . What about newest Russian AESA radars with double power..not to speak about X 10 power of latest SAM systems. So yes, USA will get good reason..if they conclude that they are technologically superior to Russia...so we will have to wait better times for USA :)

[zuenpin]

cool~~~

[Pakizfam]

not orignal :-)

[t1000eg]

THATS SOME SHIT HOT FOOTAGE

[Zuchrizal]

The launching sound is badass!

[fighterace2688]

military meshes!

[Ma3gau]

wow it looks amazing thank u bro!