bel sti, good radar detector but they never designed that model for a market out of the US, the bel sti-r with the same microwave reciever out performs the 9500ci and sti (same recievers) ,because of its ability to scan in narrow ka band, jackcc5. as redline doesnt have narrow ka software it wont be better than the sti-r or v1 in WA
sorry, I hadn't removed anything, the author removed his own comment. except now, I mistakenly removed yours Rowan!! sorry. There is no confirmation with Youtube, it just does things. I was saying the RedLine probably has the STI antenna. Why they are being bought up here is beyond me.,
why? it just has a Bel STI antenna in it. The STI and 9500ci both do poorly against the Multanova. There is no reason why the RedLine should be any different.
bel sti, good radar detector but they never designed that model for a market out of the US, the bel sti-r with the same microwave reciever out performs the 9500ci and sti (same recievers) ,because of its ability to scan in narrow ka band, jackcc5. as redline doesnt have narrow ka software it wont be better than the sti-r or v1 in WA
rowan4321 2 years ago
sorry, I hadn't removed anything, the author removed his own comment. except now, I mistakenly removed yours Rowan!! sorry. There is no confirmation with Youtube, it just does things. I was saying the RedLine probably has the STI antenna. Why they are being bought up here is beyond me.,
radarsaustralia 2 years ago
Comment removed
Jackcc5 2 years ago
have you testest this unit? it is probably the best multanova detector we have seen. 500m over a hill detection is extremely good................
radarsaustralia 2 years ago
Comment removed
Jackcc5 2 years ago
why? it just has a Bel STI antenna in it. The STI and 9500ci both do poorly against the Multanova. There is no reason why the RedLine should be any different.
radarsaustralia 2 years ago
i think it's because it Has a Digital antenna it seems to our perform the v1 in most case's in detection range
Jackcc5 2 years ago