Man, that's the best anaology I have heard about feminists to date: Like cycliists, they want to be treated as equal to automobile drivers. Until the red light comes, then they want the right to weasel through it.
Wrong. The man just have to work less. I don't see why anyone should have to work more just because he has a penis. In this hypothetical working environment, i know i would. Screw them.
is part of the reason male dominated jobs like construction or street work considered "Bad" (as in like lowlife work) is because the feminists have pushed their values onto society and made everyone think only "women's" jobs are the most worthwhile? Despite the fact that those kind of jobs that men do are necessary for society to function?
i work in a female dominated industry. i know I am better at my job than most but get an average wage. Women get to change their hours, job titles and pay with a quick chat with HR and the click of the fingers on a computer. If I want a change to my hours, job title or pay there has to be a referendum of ALL the women in the company. It's bull@#%#
I watched this with the hope that it would be useful in presenting a case to those who I find do not agree with me that there is an unbelievable amount of sexism against men that is ignored. However, I am tragically frustrated by this video. The bit about putting a 12-year-old disabled girl on the men's olympic team was atrocious. These claims are without proper background and I was extremely disappointed with the case made by this video.
@ObscureAcronymsMedia I think it was Ricky nelson that sung: "You can't please everyone, and so you've got to please yourself".
I am happy with the content and delivery of this film (and the others in the series) and I accomplished my objectives in covering the issue of equality.
22% of astronaughts were female yet only 1% of applicants were female. Numbers definately don't add up. Considering the requirements of becoming an astronaught are so high, let's assume for arguements sake that only the top 10% of either group made it in. Even operating under the assumption that women are just as capable as men, these numbers still don't add up.
No wonder there are so few feminists with math degrees. Math seems to be their greatest adversary.
Why is it we only put worth on what men do, and encourage women to be men? Aren't there jobs and skills that women have that we can encourage? Why can't people just be people and do what they're good at and if women can do something then they do it; if not, well too bad you're just like the rest of the men who can't do it either. Not every man is physically capable of being a miner or in contruction or a fireman. Hardly any men are smart enough to be astrophysicists; is that discrimination too?
I understand that part of making a video like this is over representing your point of view, and I agree with most of what you're trying to get at. That being said, women actually do make better pilots than men, they can withstand more "g"s than men. Part of what this video was (in my opinion) trying to address is acknowledging inequality where it exists, as in the brick layer example. If women are truly better at a specific task, they deserve the better pay.
@snafoofoo "Hearon and colleagues outfitted women with newly designed anti-G suits to see if that helped. It did, and the women surprised the researchers by performing as well as the men."
@snafoofoo "Results showed that G-tolerance with fit G-suits is the same compared to male fighter pilots. However, female flight performance was 15% lower than male fighter pilot performance in equal conditions. Conclusion is that female fighter pilots have to push much harder in high G environment and this effort will decrease their ability to make correct tactical maneuvers in order to get clear gun or missile shot"
@snafoofoo "If pilots can't handle the intense maneuver, they're at major risk during flights that encounter high G-force, Hearon said. Women traditionally had more trouble with the maneuver than men.
Hearon and colleagues outfitted women with newly designed anti-G suits to see if that helped. It did, and the women surprised the researchers by performing as well as the men."
(surprised, ahem)
And women do get better pay than men in some jobs, look up Warren Farrell's work.
There is another Equality issue that I notice that's happening out there; Women can easily get a Man fired for ANY reason at all. Once, I knew a man who just got a job that was somewhat fast paced, and after four weeks there he had a bad day, got a little frustrated, swore at something and then calmed down. He was then asked to leave the premises. Why? Because a woman claimed he was being belligerent. He was deemed guilty by default, not even getting a chance to plead his case.
@MikeTMerciless our society is sexist.They only support feminism.But women tend to forget that they are naturally weaker to men.It's what god has made in every being.Even in a Lion,The male is more dominant than the female.But unfortunately some women suffering from inferiority complex want to be higher than men.I thought feminism was equality,it was not supposed to be the argument that Women are superior to men.Modern Feminism is becoming evil.They are becoming a hate group like KKK.
Great post. I like the toxic female one too. Your vids here hold me back from leaning more towards equality, even though I don't think the traditional ways will ever come back again, which is opposite of what you guys seem to be saying here, that equality will never work. That's what I meant in the other vid we were talking in. I don't see them all going back to being housewives, they're too entrenched in the economy now. So in my opinion, "equality" is the only choice we have left.
@bweazel But, as this video explores: what does "equality" mean?
"Traditional" ways are nothing to do with anything. You have repeatedly commented about the films promoting a "return" to "traditional" ways of doing things. Not true. This is a poor understanding of the material.
What IS said is that the sexes are different, are complimentary and should not be adversarial, have different abilities and make different choices. From this, we should let the cards fall where they may i.e. MERITOCRACY.
Equality of outcome is not possible, and I think most people know this. All that a rational person really wants is equality of opportunity and treatment, which is all we can really ask for. It is sad that the feminists didn't get the memo. When someone is handed something that they didn't work for, it cheapens those of us that actually DID work for it.
@LadyRuin2012 Of course equality outcome is not possible and of course most people know this. But try telling this to our Feminist-run government.
Equality of opportunity is already here and has been for a long time, for men and women. However, the laws discriminating against men continue to be passed; businesses continue to be pressured with female quota's; female students are still receiving hugely more help in education despite outnumbering men and boys at all stages, especially university.
Feminists are the most revolting creatures to ever have walked the face of the earth.
No place on the face of the earth is free of their peevish shrill voices, demanding every thing and yet deserving nothing, with all of men's vices and none of men's virtues...tedious permanently offensive shallow beings who have turned their men into sniveling eunuchs concerned with being "partners" and "friends" instead of husbands, fathers and leaders of their households.....it turns the stomach, a farce!
Diversity is a strength when people with diverse skills and bachgrounds make unique contributions that others with different backgrounds can't make. But the problem occurs when diversity requires an equal distribution of people from each demographic group for every occupation or position.
Ignoring gender is exactly what gender equity should be about. Not only does this allow for real equality of opportunity based on merit, rather than outcome, but it also allows for those individuals who don't fit any gender stereotype. It gets beyond gender & identity-based politics altogether. I like that approach. And if women are better at certain tasks with respect to their social skills while men are better at other types of tasks like heavy lifting, just let the chips fall where they may.
Ignoring gender is exactly what gender equity should be about. Not only does this allow for real equality of opportunity based on merit, rather than outcome, but it also allows for those individuals who don't fit any gender stereotype. It gets beyond gender & identity-based politics altogether. I like that approach a lot.
@JesusMurphy2 ...of course strength is not everything...look around you... all things that you use and all things that makes your life easier are made and invented by MEN... if you don't like the MEN than give up from all things invented and developed by the MEN, electricity, art, literacy, clothing, architecture, toilets, everything... just strip yourself naked and go back to the woods already....
@JesusMurphy2 I should have known you were a woman. You women seem more interested in trying to be like us (men), or compete with us, and you fail miserably. Why is VAWA or affirmative action laws solely put into effect to if women are as STRONG and CAPABLE as men, huh? Tell me. Why are women constanly playing the victim card, or robbing men of their children and assets via divorce and family court? If women are so goddamn competent, than why do all these things take place. I WANT TO KNOW.
@JesusMurphy2 And tell me this, why are aren't there any female only battalions huh? I never assumed all women are weak, but why aren't more women losing their lives in war. Would you ever go on the front lines, I doubt any woman in her right mind would be foolish enough to get her ass blown to bits. And women bodybuilders are nothing but steroid junkies. You sound like a feminist, and wouldn't be surprised if you were a dyke, but it's not in my place to question your sexual preference.
@JesusMurphy2 Enough of this persistent idiocy. Why others have persevered in discussing your feeble point of view is beyond me.
When you state: "More women would be putting their lives on the line if they were allowed to", this is willful ignorance of reality and is clear misandry, as I cover in my film "Equality - War". Women do not protest the lack of females coming home in body bags.
By all means continue your discussion on your own channel but misandrists are not welcome here.
@JesusMurphy2 Hasn't it occured to you that women don't want to do hard strenuous work because their bodies aren't fit to take such physical pressure, while mens greater muscle mass, bone density, and testosterone enables them to. Women themselves would rather prefer safer jobs, especially in jobs like nursing and childcare. "Technique" didn't build the Wall of China, The Sphinxes, or even the World Trade Center. It was physical strength. Strength and determination that got the job done.
@JesusMurphy2 You sound like a mangina. Why don't women rely on "technique" when joining the military and go die in wars predominantly fought for by men if they are SO CAPABLE. And you imply that men aren't able to do certain jobs that are hard, when common sense tells you that men are built to do hard strenuous work. It's not a matter of "stereotyping", it's common sense.
I am a feminist and I believe in equal opportunities between men and women. There are differences between men and women, but there is also a lot of overlap and some women are physically stronger than some men, whereas some men are more emotional than some women... so we should not stereotype the sexes.
@artisannika What the fuck are you talking about. What do women do that enables them to be physically stronger than men? Do they die in war in large numbers? Do they bust their asses breaking back and neck, and sweating and bleeding? The last time I remembered a woman sitting her fat ass typing on a computer all day is not hard work, and men don't rely on emotion to get the job done.
@artisannika This is not a debating ground for hatemongers posing as equalists. In other words, Feminists are not welcome here. You may as well say: "I am a racist and I believe in equal opportunities between blacks and whites". Yeah, right.
Regarding individual differences between men and women, there is some truth in this, but too little to be significant in the way you suggest.. In this you display the classic ignorance of the Feminist by failing to understand when stereotypes have validity.
@JesusMurphy2 If there WPC's who could do this I would like to meet them.
The one's I have encountered stand 5'3" tall and weigh 9 stone in a wet uniform on average and that to me is neither a visual nor physical deterrent to the criminal element in UK society-more like a bunch of social workers in a police uniform.
On this youtube channel there is a equality video of a female firefighter unable to do a physical strength test whilst participating in a TV game show.......says it all really.
@JesusMurphy2 I have encountered WPC's who would be unable to make a forceable arrest of a suspect unless that same suspect gave their willing consent to be arrested-that's the reason a male police constable must accompany them on foot patrol.
WPC's demand the same level of salary but want none of the risk attached being a police officer.
Male's are indeed better at certain occupations and the police service is one of those.
Erm you say there shouldn't be female astronauts but I disagree. Space exploration is a scientific endeavour. We need to know how the female body responds in space if we ever want to exist long term in space.
Also please don't assume you know what women in general think. As a man, If anyone claimed to know what I thought I would be highly offended, but also I would regard the person as a lunatic.
Those quotes from "If Women Ruled" make me sick. They have no problem openly talking about trying to "outmanuver" men. I can't believe she said men have to be more emotional. God forbid! Then where would we be? I was talking to a relative about why I'm not a Feminist and her instict was to constantly push it on me. When I asked her about it she said that what I believe "just doesn't sound right" without ever considering what I said and without thinking. Men be more emotional? Lord help us.
Having previously worked in a large distribution ctr for a well known high street clothing chain I saw first hand the topics discussed here.
Women paid the same,but far less productive and excused from the heavier duties,combined with high levels of sick leave-not so men who were required to pick up the slack.
Management appeared reticent to pull females up on this due to accusations of sexism and a fear of a successful gender discrimination claim being brought I believe.
I love the videos....but I think you need to at least use different words. It almost sounds like you assume all women buy into it. I do understand that for the purposes of this video you have to sort of sound like that, but for the sake of trying to get brainwashed people converted I think it should sound a bit different.
@NorthStar20121 "Why do so many waste time railing against equality of outcomes"? What are you talking about? You're not making sense. The behaviour of Feminists throughout the world is crystal clear with respect to this.
Apologies if I'm wrong, but I suspect you may be a Feminist-apologist looking for a platform. If that's the case, you're invited to take your comments elsewhere.
What I said is entirely accurate: many rail against 'equality of outcomes' as though feminists were actually seeking 'equality of outcomes', and that's a waste of time.
Feminists seek legislated inequality based on a tribal pursuit of unearned advantages.
Excellent video as normal, but one thing I want to tap into which was missing.
Pregnancy and leaving. By law here in Australia (I assume it's pretty universal) if a woman is fairly pregnant, she gets a few months off work, and paid for it. Why should the boss/company pay this woman for absolutely nothing? If they're vacation days that's different. On a large basis, women quit their job after they've the birth. So while they were paid for nothing, they just quit. Totally, not, fair.
@TheAmity9 I don't understand how women can be given more free time off work than men. Pregnancy isn't an illness you have little control over, you have complete control over whether or not you get pregnant, save for the extremely rare exceptions of rape victims. But I guess in a society that permits its women to kill unborn babies, unfair job privileges is the least of our worries.
I work in construction and generally men dont care that they do 2 or three times the work of women or that women make the same wages. We men do care about is the games that women play,having sex with supervisors,filing false sexual harassement claims to keep employers from firing them for poor work, constantly daily mood changes, and not appreciating men for helping them out greatly.
I was going to make a video about equality being all about appearance, and nothing else, if you have half female staff, half black staff, and half gay staff, you're fair, anything else and you're a bigot of some sort, but you pretty much covered it in this video.
@6oodfella I think you should do one anyway, your work is very good.
But I think it's more than about halves, it's about having more women than men in any position that's at issue. If there are 50% women, that is seen as some way towards equality. If there are 75% women, that is a great deal further towards equality. If it's 100% women, why then true equality has been reached :-)
I got a pretty strong reminder of the fallacy of equality between the sexes about a month ago. My church group set up a football game, and we divided the teams between men and women. The women outnumbered us by four, they made all sorts of rules favoring themselves (such as their touchdowns counted for twice what ours did, they were allowed to tackle, but we weren't, and they could blitz twice every four downs, but we couldn't at all), and yet, the men still won. Reality bites.
@loqutor ...that only shows that women doesn't want any equality, but slave owning privileges... and congratulations for the victory against the cheating enemy...
It's a matter of capability. I work a white collar desk job, but because I'm the biggest strongest person at the office (and I just happen to be a male) who do you think gets asked to move the secretary's 300 pound desks made out of heavy oak? Who get's asked to do the heavy lifting? ME! And do I get paid to do it? Absolutely not. So if im doing EXTRA work and not getting paid for it, then why should a woman who is less capable and doing less work than a man in construction get paid the same?
@Njderig Exactly. This is an area of unfairness that any man who works in an office job encounters. It's often the work that's NOT in your job description that is foisted on men, and it goes unpaid.
@manwomanmyth Absolutely true. It's not even about the money for me, it's the fact that it is expected of me simply for being a man. Did it ever occur to them that i'm too busy working to move a damn desk? I just love how women always say "what would men do without women? Meanwhile women can't even open up a pickle jar without a man's assistance. It's really quite comical how much more women rely on men than vice versa, yet women see it exactly the opposite.
@manwomanmyth And don't forget when a wasp flies into the office, who they gonna call, a female waspbuster? No chance, the women run screaming while the men get the newspapers rolled up :)
It just so happens that I was reading my company's "workplace guidelines" today. In the section on discrimination, it listed examples of what qualified as "discrimination". Then, in the section of "What is not discrimination" it stated, "Affirmative Action is not discrimination".
Right, so, giving some members of society an advantage over another group is *not* discrimination. Got it.
Cut out the words "Men" and Women" out of EVERY lawbook and replace them with the word "human". These words also should be forbidden and only be allowed to be used in special situation. (Somehow like the word "nazi" witch is forbidden in germany and only allowed to be used for historical reasons) ....
@norxcontacts My description of Feminism has boiled down to the following: "Feminism is about removing any perceived limitations and responsibilities imposed on women, while reinforcing all of the benefits, and then doing the opposite for men (i.e. removing benefits and reinforcing limitations/responsibilities)."
In the movie, The Great Race (1965), Tony Curtis's character, the Great Leslie has an argument with a feminist (the movie takes place when the feminist movement was just getting started) and he tells her,"You're not talking about equal rights; you're talking about some convenient, feminine utopia that has all of the advantages and none of the responsibilities."
First, I find it amazing to see a movie in which a woman gets called on this.So, how have things changed this this movie back in 1965?
Your last commentator, Erin Pizzey, brings up a frighteningly interesting proposition--that governments and businesses might actually be benefitting from the increase in women workers by being able to pay them less and make more demands of them. The only issue would be that most of these laborers are non-contractual menial laborers (temps, secretaries, HR fills, etc.), so management would be diluting its talent pool unless it promotes men to outperform in key positions. Very interesting...
Of course. Businesses have benefited immensely from the propagation of feminism. Wages really haven't gone up since the 1970s but the cost of living sure has. Now except for the ultra-high earners, dual incomes are required to even have a family. Governments also got more tax money.
Where do you think feminist group funding came from?
@GiantPotato But at some point it has to come back to bite business owners in the ass... like universities stocking their classrooms with grad students and wondering why nobody's learning anything, I'd imagine the underpaid peons (male and female) who are replacing yesterday's good workers aren't going to be useful in the long run. Maybe that's part of how empires die--businesses stop thinking about what's best for the company and just try to cash in with cheap labor.
I found the brick dilemma interesting. He says there's no answer that is satisfactory to both groups but I think there is an answer, given the limited context, that can be shown otherwise. If you have a ten year old son and a five year old son and you put them both to task racking up leaves and they both put in the effort to fill as many bags of leaves as they could but the older son fills twice as many bags by virtue of his size and ability, would you pay them both the same?
@DiwataMan The "effort" is really the average woman's motivation to work. It's not even an issue of effort or time. A woman wants her part-time job to be considered just as important as a man's full-time job. A woman wants her full-time job that brings in 0.77 the amount of money a man earns to have the same household status. A woman wants her short career to be valued just as much as a man's longer career.
@DiwataMan Perhaps I'm old fashioned but I wouldn't pay them anything for doing a household chore :-)
As Angry Harry goes on to suggest, there is no real dilemma when you assess the work in isolation i.e. close your eyes and count bricks (or bags of leaves). The dilemma is a false one and only arises when you try to apply a misguided sense of "equality" to the situation and look at WHO is doing the work rather than WHAT is being done.
The man's question at 0:56 pretty much nails it. There are women at my part time job who aren't strong enough to do a lot of the tasks that the men have to do yet get the SAME PAY!!! The men have to pick up the slack for them. Women have not only gained equality but have surpassed that and actually have gained an advantage. They get to take jobs that would have gone to more physically capable men and get to demand equal pay even though there are tasks that they cannot perform. That's fair?
" if now you can sit at a keyboard and don't have to be physicality strong any more"
tell you what though a keyboard will be fucking useless where i work. i cant use it to lay a brick, saw timber, mix cement, dig a hole or lift something heavy.
if only true equality existed in the realms of seeing and addressing things logically and rationally, as you do in your vids, then much of the problem would itself vanish.
the fact that many fail to think objectively yet still succeed in having opinions only gives further evidence of the intellectual inequalitites that exist between individuals, and serves as continued damning proof of the fundamental truth of the problem of achieving "equality".
@Nimnoms I don't quite understand what you're saying.
Have you ever been in an airplane? Are the g-forces stong? They aren't at all. I don't believe that women can handle them better, but if they would, it's a matter about adaptation to it. So even if some people are handling them weakly in the beginning, you get used to it. It's why astonauts have a training. Flying a plane is much more about reflexes and a huge stress management in critical situations. Guess what gender handles stress better..
@Nimnoms how is that women can handle g force better than men...who did that study. Men have more muscle mass, bone mass, lung capacity etc. I'm pretty sure where you got that info is a malicous source. (women are better drivers, workers, parents) within the last 40-50 years all of a sudden males are crap at everything and women do so well. we need to combat these things
The whole g tolerance thing. It is based on their height. You see, a short man handles g forces better than a tall man. It has something to do with distance from the heart to extremities or something like that. But if you really want to make women look good at this task, all you have to do is forget to account for height differences. It is obvious as anything that physics does not care about genitalia... but researchers do.
@utubehayter Very well said. I have lost count of the number of people who do not allow for the source of such information, particularly with who funds such studies.
The less-then-half-truth goes like this: shorter people suffer slightly less from g-force effects; women are generally shorter than men; therefore, it's said that women handle g-force better than men. However, short men are left out. Why? Because short men handle g's better than short women as there are other factors involved.
I know who funds such studies.. It is the whole conglomerate of government funded defense "research" agencies. I am glad to report that most of this so-called "research", is a conclusion searching for a justification. And most of the money is given on EO terms.
Man, that's the best anaology I have heard about feminists to date: Like cycliists, they want to be treated as equal to automobile drivers. Until the red light comes, then they want the right to weasel through it.
MrBastilleDay 5 days ago
the result of of culture Marxism it will only get worse.
ClickForArse 1 week ago
1:45 "There is no solution"
Wrong. The man just have to work less. I don't see why anyone should have to work more just because he has a penis. In this hypothetical working environment, i know i would. Screw them.
newtubetubetube 3 months ago
is part of the reason male dominated jobs like construction or street work considered "Bad" (as in like lowlife work) is because the feminists have pushed their values onto society and made everyone think only "women's" jobs are the most worthwhile? Despite the fact that those kind of jobs that men do are necessary for society to function?
ShriekoftheVulture3 3 months ago
i work in a female dominated industry. i know I am better at my job than most but get an average wage. Women get to change their hours, job titles and pay with a quick chat with HR and the click of the fingers on a computer. If I want a change to my hours, job title or pay there has to be a referendum of ALL the women in the company. It's bull@#%#
MatthewDavine 4 months ago in playlist More videos from manwomanmyth
Men are willing to take more risks and work in hazardous situations, of course some women are willing too but those numbers are small.
commonloon0 5 months ago in playlist More videos from manwomanmyth
I watched this with the hope that it would be useful in presenting a case to those who I find do not agree with me that there is an unbelievable amount of sexism against men that is ignored. However, I am tragically frustrated by this video. The bit about putting a 12-year-old disabled girl on the men's olympic team was atrocious. These claims are without proper background and I was extremely disappointed with the case made by this video.
ObscureAcronymsMedia 8 months ago
@ObscureAcronymsMedia I think it was Ricky nelson that sung: "You can't please everyone, and so you've got to please yourself".
I am happy with the content and delivery of this film (and the others in the series) and I accomplished my objectives in covering the issue of equality.
manwomanmyth 8 months ago 5
@ObscureAcronymsMedia This video made an excellent case. You are in denial.
cracer112 6 months ago
22% of astronaughts were female yet only 1% of applicants were female. Numbers definately don't add up. Considering the requirements of becoming an astronaught are so high, let's assume for arguements sake that only the top 10% of either group made it in. Even operating under the assumption that women are just as capable as men, these numbers still don't add up.
No wonder there are so few feminists with math degrees. Math seems to be their greatest adversary.
TheLordmep 10 months ago
Why is it we only put worth on what men do, and encourage women to be men? Aren't there jobs and skills that women have that we can encourage? Why can't people just be people and do what they're good at and if women can do something then they do it; if not, well too bad you're just like the rest of the men who can't do it either. Not every man is physically capable of being a miner or in contruction or a fireman. Hardly any men are smart enough to be astrophysicists; is that discrimination too?
TwyztdValkyrie 10 months ago
I understand that part of making a video like this is over representing your point of view, and I agree with most of what you're trying to get at. That being said, women actually do make better pilots than men, they can withstand more "g"s than men. Part of what this video was (in my opinion) trying to address is acknowledging inequality where it exists, as in the brick layer example. If women are truly better at a specific task, they deserve the better pay.
snafoofoo 10 months ago
@snafoofoo "Hearon and colleagues outfitted women with newly designed anti-G suits to see if that helped. It did, and the women surprised the researchers by performing as well as the men."
heyheyolek 9 months ago
@snafoofoo "Results showed that G-tolerance with fit G-suits is the same compared to male fighter pilots. However, female flight performance was 15% lower than male fighter pilot performance in equal conditions. Conclusion is that female fighter pilots have to push much harder in high G environment and this effort will decrease their ability to make correct tactical maneuvers in order to get clear gun or missile shot"
Female Military Pilots in Finnish Air Force
Tuomo Leino, M.D.
BOOMkhopadshot 8 months ago
@snafoofoo "If pilots can't handle the intense maneuver, they're at major risk during flights that encounter high G-force, Hearon said. Women traditionally had more trouble with the maneuver than men.
Hearon and colleagues outfitted women with newly designed anti-G suits to see if that helped. It did, and the women surprised the researchers by performing as well as the men."
(surprised, ahem)
And women do get better pay than men in some jobs, look up Warren Farrell's work.
BOOMkhopadshot 8 months ago
There is another Equality issue that I notice that's happening out there; Women can easily get a Man fired for ANY reason at all. Once, I knew a man who just got a job that was somewhat fast paced, and after four weeks there he had a bad day, got a little frustrated, swore at something and then calmed down. He was then asked to leave the premises. Why? Because a woman claimed he was being belligerent. He was deemed guilty by default, not even getting a chance to plead his case.
MikeTMerciless 1 year ago
@MikeTMerciless our society is sexist.They only support feminism.But women tend to forget that they are naturally weaker to men.It's what god has made in every being.Even in a Lion,The male is more dominant than the female.But unfortunately some women suffering from inferiority complex want to be higher than men.I thought feminism was equality,it was not supposed to be the argument that Women are superior to men.Modern Feminism is becoming evil.They are becoming a hate group like KKK.
BLASTXyzzzz1234 7 months ago in playlist Feminism is bad and men are discriminated too
Great post. I like the toxic female one too. Your vids here hold me back from leaning more towards equality, even though I don't think the traditional ways will ever come back again, which is opposite of what you guys seem to be saying here, that equality will never work. That's what I meant in the other vid we were talking in. I don't see them all going back to being housewives, they're too entrenched in the economy now. So in my opinion, "equality" is the only choice we have left.
bweazel 1 year ago
@bweazel But, as this video explores: what does "equality" mean?
"Traditional" ways are nothing to do with anything. You have repeatedly commented about the films promoting a "return" to "traditional" ways of doing things. Not true. This is a poor understanding of the material.
What IS said is that the sexes are different, are complimentary and should not be adversarial, have different abilities and make different choices. From this, we should let the cards fall where they may i.e. MERITOCRACY.
manwomanmyth 1 year ago 4
lmao at Arnold in Commando
suchafool990 1 year ago
Equality of outcome is not possible, and I think most people know this. All that a rational person really wants is equality of opportunity and treatment, which is all we can really ask for. It is sad that the feminists didn't get the memo. When someone is handed something that they didn't work for, it cheapens those of us that actually DID work for it.
LadyRuin2012 1 year ago 2
@LadyRuin2012 Of course equality outcome is not possible and of course most people know this. But try telling this to our Feminist-run government.
Equality of opportunity is already here and has been for a long time, for men and women. However, the laws discriminating against men continue to be passed; businesses continue to be pressured with female quota's; female students are still receiving hugely more help in education despite outnumbering men and boys at all stages, especially university.
manwomanmyth 1 year ago
Feminists are the most revolting creatures to ever have walked the face of the earth.
No place on the face of the earth is free of their peevish shrill voices, demanding every thing and yet deserving nothing, with all of men's vices and none of men's virtues...tedious permanently offensive shallow beings who have turned their men into sniveling eunuchs concerned with being "partners" and "friends" instead of husbands, fathers and leaders of their households.....it turns the stomach, a farce!
mysweeteventhorizon 1 year ago
Diversity is a strength when people with diverse skills and bachgrounds make unique contributions that others with different backgrounds can't make. But the problem occurs when diversity requires an equal distribution of people from each demographic group for every occupation or position.
prschuster 1 year ago
Ignoring gender is exactly what gender equity should be about. Not only does this allow for real equality of opportunity based on merit, rather than outcome, but it also allows for those individuals who don't fit any gender stereotype. It gets beyond gender & identity-based politics altogether. I like that approach. And if women are better at certain tasks with respect to their social skills while men are better at other types of tasks like heavy lifting, just let the chips fall where they may.
prschuster 1 year ago 2
Ignoring gender is exactly what gender equity should be about. Not only does this allow for real equality of opportunity based on merit, rather than outcome, but it also allows for those individuals who don't fit any gender stereotype. It gets beyond gender & identity-based politics altogether. I like that approach a lot.
prschuster 1 year ago
The problem is feminsm wants equality of outcome not JUST equality of opportunity.
"Women weren't out to be men's equals; they were already convinced they were superior. So what were they after?"
- zed the zen priest
"...any feminist who claims to 'want equality' had better be willing to specify which privileges she is willing to give up."
- Robert Sheaffer
"The history of feminism is the history of women attempting to excommunicate each other from the High Priestess-hood."
- Amy Benfer
themaniusedtob 1 year ago
WOMEN OFF THE STREETS!!!! WOMEN OFF THE STREETS!!!! WOMEN OFF THE STREETS!!!!
sotonindeda 1 year ago
@JesusMurphy2 ...of course strength is not everything...look around you... all things that you use and all things that makes your life easier are made and invented by MEN... if you don't like the MEN than give up from all things invented and developed by the MEN, electricity, art, literacy, clothing, architecture, toilets, everything... just strip yourself naked and go back to the woods already....
sotonindeda 1 year ago
@XionYazuka My thoughts exactly-well said.
sixstringsforever 1 year ago
@JesusMurphy2 I should have known you were a woman. You women seem more interested in trying to be like us (men), or compete with us, and you fail miserably. Why is VAWA or affirmative action laws solely put into effect to if women are as STRONG and CAPABLE as men, huh? Tell me. Why are women constanly playing the victim card, or robbing men of their children and assets via divorce and family court? If women are so goddamn competent, than why do all these things take place. I WANT TO KNOW.
SimplyRich2060 1 year ago
@JesusMurphy2 And tell me this, why are aren't there any female only battalions huh? I never assumed all women are weak, but why aren't more women losing their lives in war. Would you ever go on the front lines, I doubt any woman in her right mind would be foolish enough to get her ass blown to bits. And women bodybuilders are nothing but steroid junkies. You sound like a feminist, and wouldn't be surprised if you were a dyke, but it's not in my place to question your sexual preference.
SimplyRich2060 1 year ago
@JesusMurphy2 Enough of this persistent idiocy. Why others have persevered in discussing your feeble point of view is beyond me.
When you state: "More women would be putting their lives on the line if they were allowed to", this is willful ignorance of reality and is clear misandry, as I cover in my film "Equality - War". Women do not protest the lack of females coming home in body bags.
By all means continue your discussion on your own channel but misandrists are not welcome here.
manwomanmyth 1 year ago 4
@JesusMurphy2 Hasn't it occured to you that women don't want to do hard strenuous work because their bodies aren't fit to take such physical pressure, while mens greater muscle mass, bone density, and testosterone enables them to. Women themselves would rather prefer safer jobs, especially in jobs like nursing and childcare. "Technique" didn't build the Wall of China, The Sphinxes, or even the World Trade Center. It was physical strength. Strength and determination that got the job done.
SimplyRich2060 1 year ago
@JesusMurphy2 You assume men and women are equals. Why don't men go on strike and let all the women do the hard work.
SimplyRich2060 1 year ago
@JesusMurphy2 You sound like a mangina. Why don't women rely on "technique" when joining the military and go die in wars predominantly fought for by men if they are SO CAPABLE. And you imply that men aren't able to do certain jobs that are hard, when common sense tells you that men are built to do hard strenuous work. It's not a matter of "stereotyping", it's common sense.
SimplyRich2060 1 year ago
I am a feminist and I believe in equal opportunities between men and women. There are differences between men and women, but there is also a lot of overlap and some women are physically stronger than some men, whereas some men are more emotional than some women... so we should not stereotype the sexes.
artisannika 1 year ago
@artisannika What the fuck are you talking about. What do women do that enables them to be physically stronger than men? Do they die in war in large numbers? Do they bust their asses breaking back and neck, and sweating and bleeding? The last time I remembered a woman sitting her fat ass typing on a computer all day is not hard work, and men don't rely on emotion to get the job done.
SimplyRich2060 1 year ago
@artisannika This is not a debating ground for hatemongers posing as equalists. In other words, Feminists are not welcome here. You may as well say: "I am a racist and I believe in equal opportunities between blacks and whites". Yeah, right.
Regarding individual differences between men and women, there is some truth in this, but too little to be significant in the way you suggest.. In this you display the classic ignorance of the Feminist by failing to understand when stereotypes have validity.
manwomanmyth 1 year ago 11
@artisannika ...go back to the cave you MAN HATER, and develop your own female technology and everything else...
sotonindeda 1 year ago 2
@JesusMurphy2 If there WPC's who could do this I would like to meet them.
The one's I have encountered stand 5'3" tall and weigh 9 stone in a wet uniform on average and that to me is neither a visual nor physical deterrent to the criminal element in UK society-more like a bunch of social workers in a police uniform.
On this youtube channel there is a equality video of a female firefighter unable to do a physical strength test whilst participating in a TV game show.......says it all really.
sixstringsforever 1 year ago
@JesusMurphy2 I have encountered WPC's who would be unable to make a forceable arrest of a suspect unless that same suspect gave their willing consent to be arrested-that's the reason a male police constable must accompany them on foot patrol.
WPC's demand the same level of salary but want none of the risk attached being a police officer.
Male's are indeed better at certain occupations and the police service is one of those.
sixstringsforever 1 year ago
Erm you say there shouldn't be female astronauts but I disagree. Space exploration is a scientific endeavour. We need to know how the female body responds in space if we ever want to exist long term in space.
Also please don't assume you know what women in general think. As a man, If anyone claimed to know what I thought I would be highly offended, but also I would regard the person as a lunatic.
nanakeyks 1 year ago
Those quotes from "If Women Ruled" make me sick. They have no problem openly talking about trying to "outmanuver" men. I can't believe she said men have to be more emotional. God forbid! Then where would we be? I was talking to a relative about why I'm not a Feminist and her instict was to constantly push it on me. When I asked her about it she said that what I believe "just doesn't sound right" without ever considering what I said and without thinking. Men be more emotional? Lord help us.
NewMeNow2000 1 year ago
Men and women can fit together perfectly, if they understand and obey the natural order of things.
That is what can bring happiness, and only that.
God made us to fit right, cos he doesn't make mistakes.
Feminist harpies are anti-male, victims of their own delusions and insecurities.
Equality for women will only bring in-equality for men.
If the moaning witches could just hush their beaks, and get on with things, the proper way, we would all be a hell of a lot happier!!
81mizzScarlett 1 year ago
BBB - Belligerent British Bitches
Britain enforces such a high level of denigration and hatred against men that we in Canada are tarred over by the ball-bashing wimmin stink.
Anyone ever wonder if this hate separation between men and women is sponsored by our illustrious government/corporate cabal...?
Tax the other half,state owned children, of course men goto prison for testosterone poisoning.
Yet, 'women are in crisis'. as continually hammered throughout University.
Very sad.
LookingGlassStudio 1 year ago 6
Having previously worked in a large distribution ctr for a well known high street clothing chain I saw first hand the topics discussed here.
Women paid the same,but far less productive and excused from the heavier duties,combined with high levels of sick leave-not so men who were required to pick up the slack.
Management appeared reticent to pull females up on this due to accusations of sexism and a fear of a successful gender discrimination claim being brought I believe.
sixstringsforever 1 year ago
I love the videos....but I think you need to at least use different words. It almost sounds like you assume all women buy into it. I do understand that for the purposes of this video you have to sort of sound like that, but for the sake of trying to get brainwashed people converted I think it should sound a bit different.
teamhex 1 year ago
Feminists don't want and aren't seeking Equality of Outcome.
NorthStar20121 1 year ago
@NorthStar20121 You're correct in a way. They want and seek a preferential outcome.
manwomanmyth 1 year ago 8
@manwomanmyth
So why do so many waste time railing against "equality of outcomes" when that's not what feminists are seeking?
NorthStar20121 1 year ago
@NorthStar20121 "Why do so many waste time railing against equality of outcomes"? What are you talking about? You're not making sense. The behaviour of Feminists throughout the world is crystal clear with respect to this.
Apologies if I'm wrong, but I suspect you may be a Feminist-apologist looking for a platform. If that's the case, you're invited to take your comments elsewhere.
manwomanmyth 1 year ago
@manwomanmyth
A 'feminist-apologist'?
I'm offended.
Nothing could be further from the truth.
What I said is entirely accurate: many rail against 'equality of outcomes' as though feminists were actually seeking 'equality of outcomes', and that's a waste of time.
Feminists seek legislated inequality based on a tribal pursuit of unearned advantages.
That is worth addressing.
NorthStar20121 1 year ago 42
@manwomanmyth
"Correct in a way"?
'Equality of Outcome' and 'a preferential outcome' are definitively different.
NorthStar20121 1 year ago
Excellent video as normal, but one thing I want to tap into which was missing.
Pregnancy and leaving. By law here in Australia (I assume it's pretty universal) if a woman is fairly pregnant, she gets a few months off work, and paid for it. Why should the boss/company pay this woman for absolutely nothing? If they're vacation days that's different. On a large basis, women quit their job after they've the birth. So while they were paid for nothing, they just quit. Totally, not, fair.
TheAmity9 1 year ago 3
@TheAmity9 I look at maternity leave in Equality - Toxic Women, Equality - The Glass Ceiling, and Equality - The Pay Gap.
manwomanmyth 1 year ago
@TheAmity9 I don't understand how women can be given more free time off work than men. Pregnancy isn't an illness you have little control over, you have complete control over whether or not you get pregnant, save for the extremely rare exceptions of rape victims. But I guess in a society that permits its women to kill unborn babies, unfair job privileges is the least of our worries.
NerfDeathcoil 1 year ago
I work in construction and generally men dont care that they do 2 or three times the work of women or that women make the same wages. We men do care about is the games that women play,having sex with supervisors,filing false sexual harassement claims to keep employers from firing them for poor work, constantly daily mood changes, and not appreciating men for helping them out greatly.
whitebitchnigga 1 year ago 6
Good video.
I was going to make a video about equality being all about appearance, and nothing else, if you have half female staff, half black staff, and half gay staff, you're fair, anything else and you're a bigot of some sort, but you pretty much covered it in this video.
6oodfella 1 year ago
@6oodfella I think you should do one anyway, your work is very good.
But I think it's more than about halves, it's about having more women than men in any position that's at issue. If there are 50% women, that is seen as some way towards equality. If there are 75% women, that is a great deal further towards equality. If it's 100% women, why then true equality has been reached :-)
manwomanmyth 1 year ago 2
Loved it
krishollow 1 year ago
I got a pretty strong reminder of the fallacy of equality between the sexes about a month ago. My church group set up a football game, and we divided the teams between men and women. The women outnumbered us by four, they made all sorts of rules favoring themselves (such as their touchdowns counted for twice what ours did, they were allowed to tackle, but we weren't, and they could blitz twice every four downs, but we couldn't at all), and yet, the men still won. Reality bites.
loqutor 1 year ago 3
@loqutor ...that only shows that women doesn't want any equality, but slave owning privileges... and congratulations for the victory against the cheating enemy...
sotonindeda 1 year ago
@sotonindeda I don't view women as the enemy.
loqutor 1 year ago
@loqutor ...you will, as soon as you open your eyes... they know how to stub you in the back, for many times...
sotonindeda 1 year ago
MOAR LIES!! (watch?v=yEeApYlVXzE)
ChairmanNuke 1 year ago
These things make my blood boil
Armilustrum 1 year ago 3
It's a matter of capability. I work a white collar desk job, but because I'm the biggest strongest person at the office (and I just happen to be a male) who do you think gets asked to move the secretary's 300 pound desks made out of heavy oak? Who get's asked to do the heavy lifting? ME! And do I get paid to do it? Absolutely not. So if im doing EXTRA work and not getting paid for it, then why should a woman who is less capable and doing less work than a man in construction get paid the same?
Njderig 1 year ago 15
@Njderig Exactly. This is an area of unfairness that any man who works in an office job encounters. It's often the work that's NOT in your job description that is foisted on men, and it goes unpaid.
manwomanmyth 1 year ago 10
@manwomanmyth Absolutely true. It's not even about the money for me, it's the fact that it is expected of me simply for being a man. Did it ever occur to them that i'm too busy working to move a damn desk? I just love how women always say "what would men do without women? Meanwhile women can't even open up a pickle jar without a man's assistance. It's really quite comical how much more women rely on men than vice versa, yet women see it exactly the opposite.
Njderig 1 year ago 4
@manwomanmyth And don't forget when a wasp flies into the office, who they gonna call, a female waspbuster? No chance, the women run screaming while the men get the newspapers rolled up :)
6oodfella 1 year ago
It just so happens that I was reading my company's "workplace guidelines" today. In the section on discrimination, it listed examples of what qualified as "discrimination". Then, in the section of "What is not discrimination" it stated, "Affirmative Action is not discrimination".
Right, so, giving some members of society an advantage over another group is *not* discrimination. Got it.
ColonelCosmic 1 year ago 31
@ColonelCosmic well said. war is peace ! freedom is slavery ! ignorance is strength ! love big brother !
2ravens2wolves 1 year ago 2
@2ravens2wolves Took the words out of my mouth.
manwomanmyth 1 year ago 3
Women seem to forget who makes the buildings and stuff for them to even TYPE on their petty keyboards. That office she's sitting in, a man made it.
ByakuyaZERO 1 year ago 4
5 Stars I love this video thanks
uratrick 1 year ago
I absolutely loved the cyclist analogy.
DIRTYDUNNZ 1 year ago 3
@DIRTYDUNNZ I was going to do more on this but I had to let it go due to time.
Cyclists claim to be the same as cars when it suits them and claim to be different to cars when it suits them.
It is a highly accurate analogy for the behaviour of Feminist women.
manwomanmyth 1 year ago 3
There is only ONE way to get equality:
Cut out the words "Men" and Women" out of EVERY lawbook and replace them with the word "human". These words also should be forbidden and only be allowed to be used in special situation. (Somehow like the word "nazi" witch is forbidden in germany and only allowed to be used for historical reasons) ....
weasel4442 1 year ago 4
Feminists don't want equal rights, they want more rights. And more and more and more and more.
norxcontacts 1 year ago 8
@norxcontacts Exactly. This is possibly the most concise description of Feminism that I've ever heard.
manwomanmyth 1 year ago 5
@norxcontacts My description of Feminism has boiled down to the following: "Feminism is about removing any perceived limitations and responsibilities imposed on women, while reinforcing all of the benefits, and then doing the opposite for men (i.e. removing benefits and reinforcing limitations/responsibilities)."
ColonelCosmic 1 year ago 5
In the movie, The Great Race (1965), Tony Curtis's character, the Great Leslie has an argument with a feminist (the movie takes place when the feminist movement was just getting started) and he tells her,"You're not talking about equal rights; you're talking about some convenient, feminine utopia that has all of the advantages and none of the responsibilities."
First, I find it amazing to see a movie in which a woman gets called on this.So, how have things changed this this movie back in 1965?
ColonelCosmic 1 year ago
@bxjam85 Yes.
EliteDoomer 1 year ago
Your last commentator, Erin Pizzey, brings up a frighteningly interesting proposition--that governments and businesses might actually be benefitting from the increase in women workers by being able to pay them less and make more demands of them. The only issue would be that most of these laborers are non-contractual menial laborers (temps, secretaries, HR fills, etc.), so management would be diluting its talent pool unless it promotes men to outperform in key positions. Very interesting...
milesbennettdyson 1 year ago
@milesbennettdyson
Of course. Businesses have benefited immensely from the propagation of feminism. Wages really haven't gone up since the 1970s but the cost of living sure has. Now except for the ultra-high earners, dual incomes are required to even have a family. Governments also got more tax money.
Where do you think feminist group funding came from?
GiantPotato 1 year ago
@GiantPotato But at some point it has to come back to bite business owners in the ass... like universities stocking their classrooms with grad students and wondering why nobody's learning anything, I'd imagine the underpaid peons (male and female) who are replacing yesterday's good workers aren't going to be useful in the long run. Maybe that's part of how empires die--businesses stop thinking about what's best for the company and just try to cash in with cheap labor.
milesbennettdyson 1 year ago
156 views....
and Hariet Harmans face and voice makes my penis burn from fear.
Sulvuss 1 year ago
I found the brick dilemma interesting. He says there's no answer that is satisfactory to both groups but I think there is an answer, given the limited context, that can be shown otherwise. If you have a ten year old son and a five year old son and you put them both to task racking up leaves and they both put in the effort to fill as many bags of leaves as they could but the older son fills twice as many bags by virtue of his size and ability, would you pay them both the same?
DiwataMan 1 year ago 2
@DiwataMan The "effort" is really the average woman's motivation to work. It's not even an issue of effort or time. A woman wants her part-time job to be considered just as important as a man's full-time job. A woman wants her full-time job that brings in 0.77 the amount of money a man earns to have the same household status. A woman wants her short career to be valued just as much as a man's longer career.
feministsAreCorrupt 1 year ago 6
This has been flagged as spam show
@feministsAreCorrupt That didn't answer the question.
DiwataMan 1 year ago
@DiwataMan Perhaps I'm old fashioned but I wouldn't pay them anything for doing a household chore :-)
As Angry Harry goes on to suggest, there is no real dilemma when you assess the work in isolation i.e. close your eyes and count bricks (or bags of leaves). The dilemma is a false one and only arises when you try to apply a misguided sense of "equality" to the situation and look at WHO is doing the work rather than WHAT is being done.
Meritocracy is the real answer.
manwomanmyth 1 year ago 2
The man's question at 0:56 pretty much nails it. There are women at my part time job who aren't strong enough to do a lot of the tasks that the men have to do yet get the SAME PAY!!! The men have to pick up the slack for them. Women have not only gained equality but have surpassed that and actually have gained an advantage. They get to take jobs that would have gone to more physically capable men and get to demand equal pay even though there are tasks that they cannot perform. That's fair?
kuunami 1 year ago 3
a very good video, as usual by manwomanmyth!
TheVerySpecialThommy 1 year ago
" if now you can sit at a keyboard and don't have to be physicality strong any more"
tell you what though a keyboard will be fucking useless where i work. i cant use it to lay a brick, saw timber, mix cement, dig a hole or lift something heavy.
trekkie108 1 year ago 10
if only true equality existed in the realms of seeing and addressing things logically and rationally, as you do in your vids, then much of the problem would itself vanish.
the fact that many fail to think objectively yet still succeed in having opinions only gives further evidence of the intellectual inequalitites that exist between individuals, and serves as continued damning proof of the fundamental truth of the problem of achieving "equality".
excellent analysis, as always!
knowthingman 1 year ago
when women say they want equal pay for equal work what they mean is that they want equal pay for equal job descriptions.
anime1973 1 year ago
@anime1973
They actually do get equal pay, or somewhere around 98%. The 'gender pay-gap' is another example of how not to do statistics that feminists parrot.
Nimnoms 1 year ago 4
You are wrong about being pilots. Women can actually handle g-force better than men, so that may give them a clear advantage in that field.
Nimnoms 1 year ago
@Nimnoms
The reason for that most females are shorther.
Paganiproductions 1 year ago
Comment removed
TheVerySpecialThommy 1 year ago
@Nimnoms I don't believe that that's true. but if it was, then you're saying that being a pilot is about handling g-force?
TheVerySpecialThommy 1 year ago 3
@TheVerySpecialThommy
Are you saying it's any less of a component than physical strength in construction? Women have an advantage there, so it's fair is it not?
Nimnoms 1 year ago
@Nimnoms I don't quite understand what you're saying.
Have you ever been in an airplane? Are the g-forces stong? They aren't at all. I don't believe that women can handle them better, but if they would, it's a matter about adaptation to it. So even if some people are handling them weakly in the beginning, you get used to it. It's why astonauts have a training. Flying a plane is much more about reflexes and a huge stress management in critical situations. Guess what gender handles stress better..
TheVerySpecialThommy 1 year ago
@Nimnoms how is that women can handle g force better than men...who did that study. Men have more muscle mass, bone mass, lung capacity etc. I'm pretty sure where you got that info is a malicous source. (women are better drivers, workers, parents) within the last 40-50 years all of a sudden males are crap at everything and women do so well. we need to combat these things
Jarack123 1 year ago
@Jarack123
The whole g tolerance thing. It is based on their height. You see, a short man handles g forces better than a tall man. It has something to do with distance from the heart to extremities or something like that. But if you really want to make women look good at this task, all you have to do is forget to account for height differences. It is obvious as anything that physics does not care about genitalia... but researchers do.
utubehayter 1 year ago
@utubehayter Very well said. I have lost count of the number of people who do not allow for the source of such information, particularly with who funds such studies.
The less-then-half-truth goes like this: shorter people suffer slightly less from g-force effects; women are generally shorter than men; therefore, it's said that women handle g-force better than men. However, short men are left out. Why? Because short men handle g's better than short women as there are other factors involved.
manwomanmyth 1 year ago
@manwomanmyth
I know who funds such studies.. It is the whole conglomerate of government funded defense "research" agencies. I am glad to report that most of this so-called "research", is a conclusion searching for a justification. And most of the money is given on EO terms.
utubehayter 1 year ago
@Jarack123 don't mind him, he's talking shit
TheVerySpecialThommy 1 year ago