No body said that a plane went through the building! Maybe a jet engine may have made it all the way through, or some landing gear. This video is dubious! What do you expect to happen when a jumbo jet hits a tower at over 500 MPH? That is was going to crumble up like a cigarette smashed into a solid brick and fall straight down? Come on bro, get out of cartoon land. This is real physics in real life. Now you know what an 767 does to a building.
"diversionary pathetic pettiness". what are you on?, what confirmation?.. you make no sense. I was just pointing out evidence was removed and destroyed from a crime scene, do you not think this is right? when you see something that is clearly wrong should we not point it out?, if there has been an injustice don't we owe it to the victims, to speak up and give them a voice?.
For your information, Wtc complex was not treated as a crime scene as it should have been, as a lot of the evidence was quickly removed, shipped abroad or destroyed, like the steel, so full scale forensic tests could not be done to gage the exact temperatures reached in critical locations by steel analysis, that could have proved or disproved foul play, why?
Forensics?.. what the hell you on about, it is very easy to tell that the planes are fake, so it's pointless arguing that they are not. That is why I asked what problems you would encounter and why, if you had to fake these plane images. If you at least try to answer my question you'll see for yourself why the planes are fake.
What I am saying is it's a pointless argument because it is provable by analyzing the footage. Yet you are arguing that the planes are real, so why talk about video analysis if by your own admission you have no clue?.
SlackerSlayer, Why cant you answer my question? I thought you were an authority on video manipulation, or that's what you tried to make out, the reason I asked you is anyone who knew anything about the problems of superimposing fake plane images into near real-time footage would understand how to tell they are fake.
You don't need a detailed analysis, I think maybe a Ape with a high intellectual caliber for ape's could figure it out... scientists have trained an ape to understand and communicate with 500 words in sign language.. problem is "INSIDE" & "JOB" are not among them.
yea whatever, you are obviously too dumb to understand this, your little brain is just not up to the task...when a car crashes into another car does it go through it...moron, did you see in the plane in person? i think not...
I not saying that nothing hit the Towers, I think it was a Global Hawk, or a V2 type rocket/missile. Some eye witnesses reported a small plane, missile. Also an eye witness to the crash of flight 93 said it was a small plane that flew over her car before crashing, and then later she identified it as a Global Hawk from looking at pictures. These kind of false flag attacks have been planned before.
I agree, the preponderance of the evidence is overwhelming. And I can totally understand the mindset of people who cannot accept the fake planes, it's a very troubling realization of the extent of the deception. but still, it MUST be addressed, and not brushed under the carpet.
I understand fully, but with the greatest respect, I don't think you do. You need to look at all the evidence, I guarantee you if you dig deep enough you will Chang your mind, as I could not possibly change it for you, which is very sad as I have invested a lot of time and effort in understanding what really happened on Sep 11, I was also like you but ended up proving myself wrong.
I think you should think about it, do a little research into the construction of the Towers, the construction of a Boeing 767, crash physics, physics in general, especially Newtons 3rd Law. I have nothing to gain by saying the planes were fake, I say it because it's true, and very very easy to see if you take your time and look at all the footage.
For example we have multiple shots of the 2nd plane with different flight paths and speeds, these are impossible contradictions.
There is no reaction with the face of the building!! the plane passes effortlessly through with not even a bent wing tip, then it exerts its energy inside the building!!, and just to add insult to injury the nose makes it all the way through intact...give me a break..fake planes.
Again a solid object, you cant compare solid objects with a plane!... a coke can is a lot better comparison than a bullet or pencil. If it is a solid object then the line of thinking is flawed from the outset therefore your conclusions will be incorrect. And I'm not a comedian, its called common sense.
a tornado can put a pencil through a phone pole. so i don't see a problem with a plane going through a building. whether or not a plane goes straight through a building isn't even relevant to the inside job or not debate as far as i can tell.
A boeing 767 (which was what these planes were) weighing approximately 380,000 lbs and going a minimum of 380 mph is going to plow through anything it comes into contact with. It wouldn't bounce off the WTC and then crumble to the ground. It IS possible for a plane to go through a steel building.
your right. planes flew into the towers. thank you for your in depth analysis. all the conflicting shots of flight 175 flying at completely different speeds and angles must be some optical illusion. you rock amanda!
In regards to the personal footage and how it is faked. Did the graphic artist get a hold of these personal films to edit them as well. Sorry, but this theory that you no planers have, doesn't add up.
YES!!! Amanda !!!! The genuine home movies. The videos taken by locals. The untampered, authentic home videos captured by horrified eyewitnesses. You've awakened me from my thoughtless slumber. Thank you for your comments, you are my hero.
Millions of people are in Manhattan when the planes hit the twin towers. Surely, you don't believe that they were ALL paid actors and non of the "real" people that go to work in NYC at 8am were told not to come in? And then all the countless videos from "locals" who were paid off...Gave their films to a single graphic artist so he can insert a "2D" plane into the film? Do you think they would risk an "unpaid" local to film a missile or an explosion with no plane? I don't think so. Ludicris.
I claim that planes hit the towers. We all saw it happen! Not to mention the billions of people that saw it, and recorded it. I loved your skill at label slapping. Call me a "CTer" again.....I love it!
Your comments have forced me to change where I stand on this. Hard to think that I could have been so dumb. Oh well, at least now I see the truth. Thanks to you.
ME? Planes hit those towers amanda, I don't think thats very boring. Do you? How dare you disrespect people that weren't bored when those planes that weren't scheduled to take off that day hit those buildings. If your going to call someone boring, you really should back your boring claim with facts. Here's one......puppies are cute.
You are misinterperting what I am writing. You think I am disrespecting people that were on the planes that day? That's a laugh. I would love to back up my "boring" claims with facts. What is the point though? You won't read the articles I give to you and you won't let the FACTS seep into your thick skull. You want to read the websites and articles support your ridiculous theory. So why should I bother giving you evidence?
What are facts anyway? The world is flat. WE have freedom of the press. Planes hit the WTC on 911. We choose our leaders through elections. You are very smart. These are the facts Amanda.
No offence dude, lol, but maybe planes arent made of solid iron, but what the hell do u think it's going to do when it hits a building at 300-500 mph with that size and weight? Only 1 thing, BLOW THROUGH. A piece of FOAM blew a hole in the shuttle cuz it was going 17000 mph. I think a plane has more wieght/mass than a small piece of foam, but then I'm just GUESSING. A damn car woulda blew into that building were it going that fast.
Your wrong. The shuttle accident was caused by one of the protective tiles being damaged allowing heat from re-entry inside the shuttle. Not a piece of foam going through the shuttle. Your making lame excuses for a lie that you choose to believe. Every single South tower hit video is phoney.
No, it's ultimate destruction was from the reentry heat, correct. But the HOLE WAS caused by foam breaking off, which knocked off/broke through the tile, which allowed the heat to enter the shuttle wing. Sorry, I'm right.
A 757 would never melt into any building at any speed. And, no , your still wrong. There was no hole. A tile was knocked off during take off. A hole would have kinda ended it right then and there. Now go eat or something.
lol, eat, yeah. a piece of foam knocked off the tile, thus leaving a hole, thus allowing heat to enter, now go on believing that a huge jumbo jet traveling at 500 mph is going to just evaporate on the spot after hitting a building or something. What do u think those buildings were made of, 3 feet thick depleted uranium? They weren't.
What if the aircraft was stationary and steal beams fell on it @ 300-400 mph? What do you see happening? Would the parts struck by the beams end up on the other side of them? Or....would they be crushed underneath them?
So if 200,000 plus pounds of metal are traveling at around 300-400 mph you expect them to just bounce off a building that's about 50 years old? (Weight/speed firgures given at boeing's company website. Age of wtc found on the wiki)
Who's phisic? Speed and Gravity have nothing to do with this video. Look up Newtons third law. To whatever force that is applied their is always an opposite and equal reaction to that applied force. Don't see that take place in Any of the second hit videos. A plane can not fly inside a building.
You obviously have no clue what Newton's laws mean. Equal and opposite forces? So if I push on a coke can with 30 lbs of force... 30 lbs of force is exerted back on my hands? Equal and opposite right? 200,000 pounds of aircraft don't just STOP.
This has been flagged as spam show
No body said that a plane went through the building! Maybe a jet engine may have made it all the way through, or some landing gear. This video is dubious! What do you expect to happen when a jumbo jet hits a tower at over 500 MPH? That is was going to crumble up like a cigarette smashed into a solid brick and fall straight down? Come on bro, get out of cartoon land. This is real physics in real life. Now you know what an 767 does to a building.
bubbasteve8 2 months ago
We need a new 911 investigation; on that we can all agree.
ronheri 3 years ago
haha bullshit. If it wasn't a plane, then what was it? A UFO possibly? Hahah
codi79 3 years ago
Well, we agree on something. :)
Anunnaki12 4 years ago
"diversionary pathetic pettiness". what are you on?, what confirmation?.. you make no sense. I was just pointing out evidence was removed and destroyed from a crime scene, do you not think this is right? when you see something that is clearly wrong should we not point it out?, if there has been an injustice don't we owe it to the victims, to speak up and give them a voice?.
Anunnaki12 4 years ago
For your information, Wtc complex was not treated as a crime scene as it should have been, as a lot of the evidence was quickly removed, shipped abroad or destroyed, like the steel, so full scale forensic tests could not be done to gage the exact temperatures reached in critical locations by steel analysis, that could have proved or disproved foul play, why?
Anunnaki12 4 years ago
Forensics?.. what the hell you on about, it is very easy to tell that the planes are fake, so it's pointless arguing that they are not. That is why I asked what problems you would encounter and why, if you had to fake these plane images. If you at least try to answer my question you'll see for yourself why the planes are fake.
Anunnaki12 4 years ago
What I am saying is it's a pointless argument because it is provable by analyzing the footage. Yet you are arguing that the planes are real, so why talk about video analysis if by your own admission you have no clue?.
Anunnaki12 4 years ago
SlackerSlayer, Why cant you answer my question? I thought you were an authority on video manipulation, or that's what you tried to make out, the reason I asked you is anyone who knew anything about the problems of superimposing fake plane images into near real-time footage would understand how to tell they are fake.
Anunnaki12 4 years ago
Well you tell me Mr know it all, if you had to put fake plane images into delayed "live feed", what problems would you encounter and why?..
Anunnaki12 4 years ago
Yeah I've never understood how anti-planners could not explain how the personal footage was faked...Or how anything else was faked for that matter.
AmandaF0001 4 years ago
And I think you should learn about stabilization. :)
Anunnaki12 4 years ago
You don't need a detailed analysis, I think maybe a Ape with a high intellectual caliber for ape's could figure it out... scientists have trained an ape to understand and communicate with 500 words in sign language.. problem is "INSIDE" & "JOB" are not among them.
Anunnaki12 4 years ago
what's this draw in to the explosion crap, nobody is saying this...you sir/maddam are a fool to think those planes were just that...learn physics...
wasy35 4 years ago
Hologram? I never said any thing about holograms or projectors....Please don't put words in my mouth. And I will pay you the same courtesy.
Anunnaki12 4 years ago
yea whatever, you are obviously too dumb to understand this, your little brain is just not up to the task...when a car crashes into another car does it go through it...moron, did you see in the plane in person? i think not...
photofu 4 years ago
don't be such a dumbass...its not that difficult to understand...planes don't melt into buildings, they crash against them....simple physics?
photofu 4 years ago
I not saying that nothing hit the Towers, I think it was a Global Hawk, or a V2 type rocket/missile. Some eye witnesses reported a small plane, missile. Also an eye witness to the crash of flight 93 said it was a small plane that flew over her car before crashing, and then later she identified it as a Global Hawk from looking at pictures. These kind of false flag attacks have been planned before.
Do a Google search for "Operation Northwoods".
Anunnaki12 4 years ago
I agree, the preponderance of the evidence is overwhelming. And I can totally understand the mindset of people who cannot accept the fake planes, it's a very troubling realization of the extent of the deception. but still, it MUST be addressed, and not brushed under the carpet.
Anunnaki12 4 years ago
I understand fully, but with the greatest respect, I don't think you do. You need to look at all the evidence, I guarantee you if you dig deep enough you will Chang your mind, as I could not possibly change it for you, which is very sad as I have invested a lot of time and effort in understanding what really happened on Sep 11, I was also like you but ended up proving myself wrong.
Anunnaki12 4 years ago
I think you should think about it, do a little research into the construction of the Towers, the construction of a Boeing 767, crash physics, physics in general, especially Newtons 3rd Law. I have nothing to gain by saying the planes were fake, I say it because it's true, and very very easy to see if you take your time and look at all the footage.
For example we have multiple shots of the 2nd plane with different flight paths and speeds, these are impossible contradictions.
Anunnaki12 4 years ago
Move on troll, nothing to see here!
guntherznadz 4 years ago
There is no reaction with the face of the building!! the plane passes effortlessly through with not even a bent wing tip, then it exerts its energy inside the building!!, and just to add insult to injury the nose makes it all the way through intact...give me a break..fake planes.
Anunnaki12 4 years ago
Again a solid object, you cant compare solid objects with a plane!... a coke can is a lot better comparison than a bullet or pencil. If it is a solid object then the line of thinking is flawed from the outset therefore your conclusions will be incorrect. And I'm not a comedian, its called common sense.
Anunnaki12 4 years ago
planes don't melt into buildings...thanx...
photofu 4 years ago
a tornado can put a pencil through a phone pole. so i don't see a problem with a plane going through a building. whether or not a plane goes straight through a building isn't even relevant to the inside job or not debate as far as i can tell.
cyberpsygen7 4 years ago 2
you dont know shit about physics.
chibangin007 4 years ago
A pencil is a solid object, so to try and make a comparison with a plane is insane, trust me. A better comparison would be a coke can.
Anunnaki12 4 years ago
How much are you paid?
Ketiara 4 years ago
Amanda you really need to do a study of CRASH PHYSICS.
SeekNTruth 4 years ago
A boeing 767 (which was what these planes were) weighing approximately 380,000 lbs and going a minimum of 380 mph is going to plow through anything it comes into contact with. It wouldn't bounce off the WTC and then crumble to the ground. It IS possible for a plane to go through a steel building.
AmandaF0001 4 years ago
your right. planes flew into the towers. thank you for your in depth analysis. all the conflicting shots of flight 175 flying at completely different speeds and angles must be some optical illusion. you rock amanda!
guntherznadz 4 years ago
I'm sorry you can't answer the question without sarcasm.
AmandaF0001 4 years ago
what was the question?
guntherznadz 4 years ago
In regards to the personal footage and how it is faked. Did the graphic artist get a hold of these personal films to edit them as well. Sorry, but this theory that you no planers have, doesn't add up.
AmandaF0001 4 years ago
YES!!! Amanda !!!! The genuine home movies. The videos taken by locals. The untampered, authentic home videos captured by horrified eyewitnesses. You've awakened me from my thoughtless slumber. Thank you for your comments, you are my hero.
guntherznadz 4 years ago
Again, you are avoiding the question. You prove that you are a true CTist. How can I put it so that you may understand?
AmandaF0001 4 years ago
Millions of people are in Manhattan when the planes hit the twin towers. Surely, you don't believe that they were ALL paid actors and non of the "real" people that go to work in NYC at 8am were told not to come in? And then all the countless videos from "locals" who were paid off...Gave their films to a single graphic artist so he can insert a "2D" plane into the film? Do you think they would risk an "unpaid" local to film a missile or an explosion with no plane? I don't think so. Ludicris.
AmandaF0001 4 years ago
Please, enlighten me since you know so much about what you are talking about yet make no sense at all.
AmandaF0001 4 years ago
ME enlighten you?......As if I could. I think I'm falling in love w/ your mind. Thank you for these posts, please write more.
guntherznadz 4 years ago
Thanks for proving your like all the other CTist. No evidence to present and can't back up your claims. Have fun trying to prove your point.
AmandaF0001 4 years ago
I claim that planes hit the towers. We all saw it happen! Not to mention the billions of people that saw it, and recorded it. I loved your skill at label slapping. Call me a "CTer" again.....I love it!
guntherznadz 4 years ago
You claim that planes hit the towers?! Certaintly does contradict this video.
AmandaF0001 4 years ago
Your comments have forced me to change where I stand on this. Hard to think that I could have been so dumb. Oh well, at least now I see the truth. Thanks to you.
guntherznadz 4 years ago
Your boring.
AmandaF0001 4 years ago
why? Because I won't argue w/ you? Go spend some time w/ your family if your so bored. ugh
guntherznadz 4 years ago
I never said I was bored. You're just boring.
AmandaF0001 4 years ago
ME? Planes hit those towers amanda, I don't think thats very boring. Do you? How dare you disrespect people that weren't bored when those planes that weren't scheduled to take off that day hit those buildings. If your going to call someone boring, you really should back your boring claim with facts. Here's one......puppies are cute.
guntherznadz 4 years ago
You are misinterperting what I am writing. You think I am disrespecting people that were on the planes that day? That's a laugh. I would love to back up my "boring" claims with facts. What is the point though? You won't read the articles I give to you and you won't let the FACTS seep into your thick skull. You want to read the websites and articles support your ridiculous theory. So why should I bother giving you evidence?
AmandaF0001 4 years ago
Fact#1 Your television is brainwashing you.
Fact#2 You don't even know it.
Fact#3 Your heart is not in this issue. Your only reason for posting is to engage in a debate which has but one outcome.
guntherznadz 4 years ago
What are facts anyway? The world is flat. WE have freedom of the press. Planes hit the WTC on 911. We choose our leaders through elections. You are very smart. These are the facts Amanda.
guntherznadz 4 years ago
No offence dude, lol, but maybe planes arent made of solid iron, but what the hell do u think it's going to do when it hits a building at 300-500 mph with that size and weight? Only 1 thing, BLOW THROUGH. A piece of FOAM blew a hole in the shuttle cuz it was going 17000 mph. I think a plane has more wieght/mass than a small piece of foam, but then I'm just GUESSING. A damn car woulda blew into that building were it going that fast.
tylerdurden246 4 years ago 2
Your wrong. The shuttle accident was caused by one of the protective tiles being damaged allowing heat from re-entry inside the shuttle. Not a piece of foam going through the shuttle. Your making lame excuses for a lie that you choose to believe. Every single South tower hit video is phoney.
guntherznadz 4 years ago
No, it's ultimate destruction was from the reentry heat, correct. But the HOLE WAS caused by foam breaking off, which knocked off/broke through the tile, which allowed the heat to enter the shuttle wing. Sorry, I'm right.
tylerdurden246 4 years ago
A 757 would never melt into any building at any speed. And, no , your still wrong. There was no hole. A tile was knocked off during take off. A hole would have kinda ended it right then and there. Now go eat or something.
guntherznadz 4 years ago
lol, eat, yeah. a piece of foam knocked off the tile, thus leaving a hole, thus allowing heat to enter, now go on believing that a huge jumbo jet traveling at 500 mph is going to just evaporate on the spot after hitting a building or something. What do u think those buildings were made of, 3 feet thick depleted uranium? They weren't.
tylerdurden246 4 years ago
Including the personal footage?
AmandaF0001 4 years ago
bedtime for planehuggers!
chibangin007 4 years ago
hell yeah bro! people are finding out everyday! those planes we saw on tv were fake!
chibangin007 4 years ago
What if the aircraft was stationary and steal beams fell on it @ 300-400 mph? What do you see happening? Would the parts struck by the beams end up on the other side of them? Or....would they be crushed underneath them?
guntherznadz 4 years ago
nice counter. no reply graham?
edyken77 4 years ago
So if 200,000 plus pounds of metal are traveling at around 300-400 mph you expect them to just bounce off a building that's about 50 years old? (Weight/speed firgures given at boeing's company website. Age of wtc found on the wiki)
grahambcp 4 years ago
nah do what you want. i say my opinion. i live in usa and dont thing its a inside job like many say!
splcst659 4 years ago
Hey if thats your opinion then thats your opinion. You should watch September Clues parts 1-5. You might learn some things that you never knew.
guntherznadz 4 years ago
do you know phisic? speed/gravity....
splcst659 4 years ago
Who's phisic? Speed and Gravity have nothing to do with this video. Look up Newtons third law. To whatever force that is applied their is always an opposite and equal reaction to that applied force. Don't see that take place in Any of the second hit videos. A plane can not fly inside a building.
guntherznadz 4 years ago
You obviously have no clue what Newton's laws mean. Equal and opposite forces? So if I push on a coke can with 30 lbs of force... 30 lbs of force is exerted back on my hands? Equal and opposite right? 200,000 pounds of aircraft don't just STOP.
grahambcp 4 years ago 2
Wonder why they couldn't make the WTC out of the same material as that hijacked plane and hijacker's passport which survived the carnage?
muckletoon 4 years ago
love the hail damage photo
genghis6199 4 years ago