@FarceTheory Wow....you really didnt understand the nature of this thing did you? perhaps you should watch it again...it Ionizes the air around it causing it to levitate WITHOUT any moving parts....quite unlike a fan!
@FarceTheory OMG!! LMAO@U This is just too easy! You do realize how that thing works right? It has its bladed impeller unit hidden in its base that sucks in air just like a vacuum cleaner....then it forces the air up through an empty chamber & blows it through a small groove in the loop. Helped by the Coanda Effect and other reasons all based on aerodynamic reasons, it then sucks air from inside the hole causing a pretty decent air stream! PLENTY of moving parts, my friend! /watch?v=8he8afjQyd8
@FarceTheory Are you retarded.....seriously I really want to know...I feel kind of guilty arguing with you....R U a child or something? Anyway...My first comment was very clear...I have no Idea what you think it said, as the "contridiction" U point out has nothing to do with anything I said....I said its unlike a fan because it moves air WITHOUT MOVING PARTS!!!.......
LOL You’re the one to throw a fit on a simple fact. If I said Deep Space One was a rocket would you throw a fit too. You did bust me out on the dyson never did by one. Assumed it was ion. Anyways take care. PS It’s a FAN!
@FarceTheory That I threw a fit suggests I read your original comment in horror, urgently needing to correct your "facts" The truth is I just find people making fools of themselves entertaining. Had U admitted U were wrong in the begining I would have respectfully accepted this....but instead U kept digging a deeper hole, eventually arguing a bizarre theory that I had contridicted myself by suggesting something about powered devices, and flowing gas...which I never mentioned anywhere! LMAO!
Its not a fake. This is a device that uses high voltage electricity,(not sunlight) to power it. The air is ionized by the upper tips and flows down into the grid creating a wind. There are devices today, look on youtube, that do the same but some try to say its anti gravity.
Hey everyone,peace and love: I used to make a real pest of myself trying to tell everyone that lifters would fly in vacuums, and I was wrong. It's only an ion-wind effect, You can see for yourself: NASA/CR—2004-213312 (google that) and look at page 6, paragraph one. Also google 'gravitec inc data talley', download the pdf and read the conclusions on page 91. They are both PDF's that everyone can find, and I apologize for being so insane.
There is a great website by Jean Naudin - France that shows how to make these - I have used color CRT power supplies and made my own power supplies. Appears to ionize air in atmosphere and will fly with polarity reversed - had my students make a lot of these for rapid prototyping assignment. Just look up 'lifters' in Google. Works in vacuum but better with Xenon gas (several of the deep space probes) do to low thrust - less accelerant needed
@penceetc lolll the mythbuter try it in a vacuum chamber and it did not work so its kind of imposible to use in space ....... anyway the technology look kool and promizing but ue such a power full source of power compare to the weigth lifted its almost unusefull like they say it have to be powered from the ground ...anyways an old propeler do more then that ... its like that super low temperature levitation .. good for desk display but for the rest its useless
@penceetc Actually in hard vacuum they have been reported not to function at all. Due to the lack of air to ionize. Both mythbusters and NASA have showen this happen in thier tests.
your right they need air to operate, the russians space missions had compressed air for long term missions... they found that very little air is needed for prolonged yet small thrust
i wonder if there could be any thrust from Casimir effect in a vacuum
@purplemom07 Surpressed? If that is so then why does this appear to be some sort of an infomercial made by the military? Why does NASA not try to hide the fact that they have experimented with these in the past or at least refrain from publishing thier results publicly? Why does no one seem to be hiding anything that they have done with these? I see evidence that the technology exists but I see any evidence of any attempt to hide it... it is just not in use because it is not particularly usefull
PLEASE DON'T READ THIS you will die in seven days if you don't post this comment on 10 videos in the next hour. if you do, tomorrow will be the best day of your life
When configured as a TT Brown electrokinetic appratus, it uses less Wattage, and has more power, speed, and thrust. For example, this 4 x4 foot square device uses 30,000 Volts @ 3 milliAmps, or 90-Watts. By comparison, the 6-foot diameter Beamship Variation III, (on YouTube), uses less than 60-Watts, and LEAPS to the ceiling. Different patents, different methodologies. Ion-wind has an upper limit in air, and will not fly in vacuum, unlike the Biefeld Brown effect which does, with less input.
WOW! I bought one at the electronics store. It's called a fan.
FarceTheory 1 year ago
@FarceTheory Wow....you really didnt understand the nature of this thing did you? perhaps you should watch it again...it Ionizes the air around it causing it to levitate WITHOUT any moving parts....quite unlike a fan!
frankensteinmoneymac 1 year ago
@frankensteinmoneymac Look up "Dyson air multiplier"
FarceTheory 1 year ago
@FarceTheory OMG!! LMAO@U This is just too easy! You do realize how that thing works right? It has its bladed impeller unit hidden in its base that sucks in air just like a vacuum cleaner....then it forces the air up through an empty chamber & blows it through a small groove in the loop. Helped by the Coanda Effect and other reasons all based on aerodynamic reasons, it then sucks air from inside the hole causing a pretty decent air stream! PLENTY of moving parts, my friend! /watch?v=8he8afjQyd8
frankensteinmoneymac 1 year ago
@frankensteinmoneymac Congratulations! You contradicted your first comment by stating A fan is a powered device used to create flow within a gas.
FarceTheory 1 year ago
@FarceTheory Are you retarded.....seriously I really want to know...I feel kind of guilty arguing with you....R U a child or something? Anyway...My first comment was very clear...I have no Idea what you think it said, as the "contridiction" U point out has nothing to do with anything I said....I said its unlike a fan because it moves air WITHOUT MOVING PARTS!!!.......
frankensteinmoneymac 1 year ago
LOL You’re the one to throw a fit on a simple fact. If I said Deep Space One was a rocket would you throw a fit too. You did bust me out on the dyson never did by one. Assumed it was ion. Anyways take care. PS It’s a FAN!
FarceTheory 1 year ago
@FarceTheory That I threw a fit suggests I read your original comment in horror, urgently needing to correct your "facts" The truth is I just find people making fools of themselves entertaining. Had U admitted U were wrong in the begining I would have respectfully accepted this....but instead U kept digging a deeper hole, eventually arguing a bizarre theory that I had contridicted myself by suggesting something about powered devices, and flowing gas...which I never mentioned anywhere! LMAO!
frankensteinmoneymac 1 year ago
Hummmm......wonder who holds the patten?
mrperling 1 year ago
Curtain of safety around the US??? How deluded were they in those days???
hoplite46 1 year ago
I guess we'll see the Technology when the anti-christ is ready to make his move.
stybarrow 1 year ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
yea, im pretty sure this is a clever fake.
14ledzeppelin14 2 years ago
@14ledzeppelin14
Actually they still do this stuff today, check out JL Naudin or "Lifters"
nightmathzombieethan 2 years ago 2
Its not a fake. This is a device that uses high voltage electricity,(not sunlight) to power it. The air is ionized by the upper tips and flows down into the grid creating a wind. There are devices today, look on youtube, that do the same but some try to say its anti gravity.
Texmurphy51 1 year ago
if this was in the 1950's just think what they could do with it now. and im sure its been funded well too.
Gwaltney420 2 years ago 4
Exactly right, matey.
Beamshipcaptain 2 years ago
@gwaltney420 you know whats sad we all know were being lied to by our governments and kept from these big secrets and no one gives a shit
p6a9u1l42 1 year ago
i agree. fuck the government for that
clbgeballe 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Hey everyone,peace and love: I used to make a real pest of myself trying to tell everyone that lifters would fly in vacuums, and I was wrong. It's only an ion-wind effect, You can see for yourself: NASA/CR—2004-213312 (google that) and look at page 6, paragraph one. Also google 'gravitec inc data talley', download the pdf and read the conclusions on page 91. They are both PDF's that everyone can find, and I apologize for being so insane.
BeanshipCaptain 2 years ago
There is a great website by Jean Naudin - France that shows how to make these - I have used color CRT power supplies and made my own power supplies. Appears to ionize air in atmosphere and will fly with polarity reversed - had my students make a lot of these for rapid prototyping assignment. Just look up 'lifters' in Google. Works in vacuum but better with Xenon gas (several of the deep space probes) do to low thrust - less accelerant needed
penceetc 2 years ago 15
@penceetc wow i want you for a teacher! where are ya? lol cool idea
indibabs122275 1 year ago
@penceetc lolll the mythbuter try it in a vacuum chamber and it did not work so its kind of imposible to use in space ....... anyway the technology look kool and promizing but ue such a power full source of power compare to the weigth lifted its almost unusefull like they say it have to be powered from the ground ...anyways an old propeler do more then that ... its like that super low temperature levitation .. good for desk display but for the rest its useless
GHOSTTOYS 1 year ago
@penceetc Actually in hard vacuum they have been reported not to function at all. Due to the lack of air to ionize. Both mythbusters and NASA have showen this happen in thier tests.
MrAwsome514 1 year ago
@MrAwsome514
your right they need air to operate, the russians space missions had compressed air for long term missions... they found that very little air is needed for prolonged yet small thrust
i wonder if there could be any thrust from Casimir effect in a vacuum
Zoidborg1 1 year ago
This is evidence enough of a suppressed technology...
purplemom07 2 years ago 15
looks like proof to me. more proof of course.
KKinsane2009 2 years ago 5
@purplemom07 Surpressed? If that is so then why does this appear to be some sort of an infomercial made by the military? Why does NASA not try to hide the fact that they have experimented with these in the past or at least refrain from publishing thier results publicly? Why does no one seem to be hiding anything that they have done with these? I see evidence that the technology exists but I see any evidence of any attempt to hide it... it is just not in use because it is not particularly usefull
MrAwsome514 1 year ago
This couldn't have anything to do with all of those flying triangle UFOs people have seen flying around, could it?
chriskendall1 2 years ago 8
Yes, it bloody-well could!
Beamshipcaptain 2 years ago
jonolot - wow
rychodragon197 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
PLEASE DON'T READ THIS you will die in seven days if you don't post this comment on 10 videos in the next hour. if you do, tomorrow will be the best day of your life
deanpoeki 3 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
tickle and lick my cleanly shaven, swingy loose ,meaty balls!!!untill i have a great big fucking shoot off!!!!!!!!
joecobra1234 3 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
eat my balls
halo599999 3 years ago
If only it were faster...
39Hool 3 years ago 2
When configured as a TT Brown electrokinetic appratus, it uses less Wattage, and has more power, speed, and thrust. For example, this 4 x4 foot square device uses 30,000 Volts @ 3 milliAmps, or 90-Watts. By comparison, the 6-foot diameter Beamship Variation III, (on YouTube), uses less than 60-Watts, and LEAPS to the ceiling. Different patents, different methodologies. Ion-wind has an upper limit in air, and will not fly in vacuum, unlike the Biefeld Brown effect which does, with less input.
Beamshipcaptain 2 years ago 3
Watch the skies!
3Deity 4 years ago 4