Military did test the C-Mag and as it turned out. It's not nearly as reliable as this commercial stated. It jamed constantly in sandy environment. That's why they didn't adopt this.
Also, another advantage of linked munition is the ability to topoff even during firing by simply linking more munitions to the current belt. Something an enclosed magazine can't do.
I think that this 100 round mag is good for some defensive situations (or cleaning some rooms if offensive ones), if I go to action I would want to have some 30 round mags ,some 40 round mags and one 100 round mag
no i would dissagre when you shot a mg249 off a belt the rounds are kept in a canvas bag under the gun and they make c mags with clear backs so u can see the rounds
try 250 online.... ouch for those savvy enough to comment on youtube, but not to do research online... in fact, you can get it for less than 250, but then you don't get the dry-lube and the fancy pouch....
and the cost of the bullets has to do WHAT with the magazine again? oh wait, it doesn't, the cost for 100 rounds of .223/5.56 is THE SAME no matter what magazine you use...
what does that even mean? "100 bullets in a round"???
If you waste them or not has NOTHING to to with the magazine but all to do with YOU! You can "waste" 30 rounds out of a regular mag just as easy. If anything, you should think for a second about the crap you post. Not even a coherent sentence here. Lets not even talk about logic. First you argue that 100 rounds is more expensive depending on the mag you use, now the mag is what determines how you use them. People like you shouldn't even vote
if its a c-mag, its meant so they can lay down cover or sustained fire. thus "wasting?" them with a purpose. also they dont need a magazine to tell them how to fire, thats what the DISCIPLINE is for
@emokalowns to tell you the truth m16 is not just called m16. there are "classes" if you will like m16a1,m16a2,m16a3,and m16a4 and i think that it look it up
yeah, lets see... the battle load of a soldier is 6 mags of 30 rounds each... a 100 round c mag weighs less than 3 loaded 30 round box mags.... let me do the math here.... I'll take 2 cmags over 6 box mags any day when weight is my only concern, cause I get 20 rounds more for less weight....
dude would you like to carry 200 punds on a gun at once or carry less in your pockets. with the c mag it would be realy heavy and gravity would pull your gun down.
100 rounds, not 200 "punds" (a mix of rounds and pounds?)... and with all the stuff they hang from guns these days, you know rail systems, forward grips, bi pods, flashlights, all kinds of lasers, scopes, etc... I doubt a magazine weighing slightly more than double (remember, it weighs less than 3) wouldn't be that bad... oh way, it ISN'T... cause I've done it... its not forward, so it doesn't pull you down (lack of a lever).... besides, its more to fill the gap between a 249 and an m4 anyway...
Wow.... I can completely understand why no military took them seriously.... In the opening video, there's a guy with a desert eagle, and they keep referring to the magazine incorrectly as a "clip". I would think that a company that makes magazines would know the difference between a magazine and a clip....
wow, thats strange... I guess I must have dreamt up those reports of it jamming in afghanistan because of sand, since NO military ever took them seriously.... wonder how they got there....
I have two for personal use. I was also a saw gunner in the USMC. I carried six of them instead of running around with belts. I will put my life on the c-mag. I think out of 100,000 rounds that I put through the saw in a year with them I only had a few maby five jams. I beat the hell out of them and they kept going. I say get one, two would be better, before the price goes up even moor.
Semper Fi marine! I hope the guy who said that "no military took them serious" reads your post.... Where did you put those rounds through it? I heard it jamming up in afghanistan (and actually costing lives because of it, two guys with jamming cmags got caught behind enemy lines) early on...
nah. The 90 rounder is a piece of junk(might be what yer thinking of). C-Mag's are awesome, haven't had a jam in over 20K rounds. As long as you lube it with the graphite composite that they give you, should last forever.
no, I'm pretty sure I heard that about the betamag... not the 90 rounder... saw those at a gun show this weekend... they are way too big and they're junky... its horrible... plus it throws all the weight to one side...
should also mention that the molle bag that comes with it, you can put 5 normal m4 mags in it, and it fits tightly, so great to throw on yer molle backpack, belt, vest, whatever. :-)
Wow you must be making crazy bucks now that Obama is in office and all our civil rights have gone out of the window, the cops just came and took all my guns and made me watch some liberal propaganda. Oh how different our lives are now compared to when Bush was in power, the freedom she is gone.
there are reports on DefendAmerica that allege the C-mag is frequently jamming and that soldiers disapprove of it. it puts stress on the magazine release system as well
THAT IS THE PROBLEM IF THE TEACHERS OR THE PRINCIPLE HAD A GUN then it wouldn't of happened
7777777drake 3 months ago in playlist More videos from lastopher7
I use an m16 drum mag fires 2500 bullets!
Moviesayer 9 months ago
howcome they dont use that on Afganistan or Iraq
mitsubishidiamante 1 year ago
@mitsubishidiamante they do use c-mags in a limited capacity in units in afghanistan
agricola 2 months ago
Why is he firing left handed?
henrytdsimmons 1 year ago
Military did test the C-Mag and as it turned out. It's not nearly as reliable as this commercial stated. It jamed constantly in sandy environment. That's why they didn't adopt this.
Also, another advantage of linked munition is the ability to topoff even during firing by simply linking more munitions to the current belt. Something an enclosed magazine can't do.
danshyu 1 year ago 3
C-Mag. Gives weapons a bigger balls to deal with enemies.
HardcoreGamer10000 1 year ago
3:30 - 4x30 round clips this guy is promoting for the beta c magazine and he doesn't know the difference between a clip and a magazine?
darkchild256 1 year ago
Comment removed
MahBoiProduction 1 year ago
its funny how the narrator says c-maaaaag haha
dakingofdanoobs 1 year ago
i 've found the rpk drum is much better, the c mag is so un reliable
QQ20034 1 year ago
If you didn't want to buy a C-Mag after this you must have no soul.
bobboberstand 1 year ago
I think that this 100 round mag is good for some defensive situations (or cleaning some rooms if offensive ones), if I go to action I would want to have some 30 round mags ,some 40 round mags and one 100 round mag
ww2footage 2 years ago
theres 1 thing better with belt fed MGs, u can see how many rounds are left.
Suomipanzerdiv13 2 years ago
no i would dissagre when you shot a mg249 off a belt the rounds are kept in a canvas bag under the gun and they make c mags with clear backs so u can see the rounds
lastopher7 2 years ago 6
Hell I'll sell you mine for $250
762minigun 2 years ago
i bet the mag is exspensive and then the cost of the bullets to fill it up will start to get very costly
bluefire9998 2 years ago
yea i went to a local gun shop and inquired about the price and i was told it cost around $350...ouch
TheLonewolf313 2 years ago
try 250 online.... ouch for those savvy enough to comment on youtube, but not to do research online... in fact, you can get it for less than 250, but then you don't get the dry-lube and the fancy pouch....
Larryud45 2 years ago
yea i eventually did a little research and found that i could purchase the c mag much cheaper than i thought
TheLonewolf313 2 years ago
and the cost of the bullets has to do WHAT with the magazine again? oh wait, it doesn't, the cost for 100 rounds of .223/5.56 is THE SAME no matter what magazine you use...
Larryud45 2 years ago
Comment removed
bluefire9998 2 years ago
what does that even mean? "100 bullets in a round"???
If you waste them or not has NOTHING to to with the magazine but all to do with YOU! You can "waste" 30 rounds out of a regular mag just as easy. If anything, you should think for a second about the crap you post. Not even a coherent sentence here. Lets not even talk about logic. First you argue that 100 rounds is more expensive depending on the mag you use, now the mag is what determines how you use them. People like you shouldn't even vote
Larryud45 2 years ago
Comment removed
bluefire9998 2 years ago
@bluefire9998
so only take 30, nomatter how many fit in your mag? I don't get your point. And if you don't have self control, fine. I have plenty...
Larryud45 2 years ago
Hehhaha he voted for Obama. i hope Obama won't ban certain guns
chich311 2 years ago
lol so true
emokalowns 1 year ago
if its a c-mag, its meant so they can lay down cover or sustained fire. thus "wasting?" them with a purpose. also they dont need a magazine to tell them how to fire, thats what the DISCIPLINE is for
eghotchkin 2 years ago
Comment removed
emokalowns 1 year ago
they made the m16 3 shot burst because of people like you
emokalowns 1 year ago
@emokalowns you mus be a call ofduty fan haha no comment
bluefire9998 1 year ago
yes the game is fun but its true they couldnt rain american troops not to waste all there ammo
emokalowns 1 year ago
@emokalowns to tell you the truth m16 is not just called m16. there are "classes" if you will like m16a1,m16a2,m16a3,and m16a4 and i think that it look it up
bluefire9998 1 year ago
wouldent the bullets be to heavy to carry 100 rounds all at once instead of switching out clips
19jakeproductions 2 years ago
yeah, lets see... the battle load of a soldier is 6 mags of 30 rounds each... a 100 round c mag weighs less than 3 loaded 30 round box mags.... let me do the math here.... I'll take 2 cmags over 6 box mags any day when weight is my only concern, cause I get 20 rounds more for less weight....
Larryud45 2 years ago
dude would you like to carry 200 punds on a gun at once or carry less in your pockets. with the c mag it would be realy heavy and gravity would pull your gun down.
19jakeproductions 2 years ago
100 rounds, not 200 "punds" (a mix of rounds and pounds?)... and with all the stuff they hang from guns these days, you know rail systems, forward grips, bi pods, flashlights, all kinds of lasers, scopes, etc... I doubt a magazine weighing slightly more than double (remember, it weighs less than 3) wouldn't be that bad... oh way, it ISN'T... cause I've done it... its not forward, so it doesn't pull you down (lack of a lever).... besides, its more to fill the gap between a 249 and an m4 anyway...
Larryud45 2 years ago
ALL AT A NEW LOW COST!!! $300
warnerd14 2 years ago
Wow.... I can completely understand why no military took them seriously.... In the opening video, there's a guy with a desert eagle, and they keep referring to the magazine incorrectly as a "clip". I would think that a company that makes magazines would know the difference between a magazine and a clip....
RAG3T3K 2 years ago 11
never noticed that was a eagle they only show it for a 1/4 of a sec thats a pretty good call
lastopher7 2 years ago
they were referring to the different feed clips for the M16/M249 Saw models not a magazine its self.
scottdaniels13 2 years ago
wow, thats strange... I guess I must have dreamt up those reports of it jamming in afghanistan because of sand, since NO military ever took them seriously.... wonder how they got there....
Larryud45 2 years ago
@RAG3T3K This wouldn't have been a military video. And the military does use C-mags. They are given to support units.
fdsman 1 year ago
@RAG3T3K not only that, but you'd usually conserve ammo in the field. After Vietnam shooting auto rather in bursts only occurs in front of cameras.
R5H4D0W 4 months ago
The music in these comercials is so bad!
J0uzze 2 years ago
thats why i made my other video
lastopher7 2 years ago
@J0uzze who cares about the music....the mags work thats what counts
mikea12001 1 year ago
@J0uzze but its so funky freash
MrTheree 1 month ago
the saw should hold up to over 9000S BULLETS!
trevorjohn9 2 years ago
They should make a 200 round drum
Cwayne28 3 years ago 4
it would be to heavy
lastopher7 2 years ago
Comment removed
lucianchapar 3 years ago
that made no sense.
fusionstar916 3 years ago
ya i dont no what he said ethier
lastopher7 3 years ago
Comment removed
lucianchapar 3 years ago
the C drum looks like nuts on the M16 lol
andyroo89 3 years ago 21
@andyroo89 thats what the mexican cartel calls them
acemace3618 2 months ago
wow i wonder how good those c mags are i heard they are unrelyable
choopdewoot 3 years ago
I heard that they jam easily
andyroo89 3 years ago
I have two for personal use. I was also a saw gunner in the USMC. I carried six of them instead of running around with belts. I will put my life on the c-mag. I think out of 100,000 rounds that I put through the saw in a year with them I only had a few maby five jams. I beat the hell out of them and they kept going. I say get one, two would be better, before the price goes up even moor.
interintohell 3 years ago 2
How does the reliability compare to 30-rd box magazines?
xxwzaebd 2 years ago
Semper Fi marine! I hope the guy who said that "no military took them serious" reads your post.... Where did you put those rounds through it? I heard it jamming up in afghanistan (and actually costing lives because of it, two guys with jamming cmags got caught behind enemy lines) early on...
Larryud45 2 years ago
nah. The 90 rounder is a piece of junk(might be what yer thinking of). C-Mag's are awesome, haven't had a jam in over 20K rounds. As long as you lube it with the graphite composite that they give you, should last forever.
meshuggahfan 3 years ago
no, I'm pretty sure I heard that about the betamag... not the 90 rounder... saw those at a gun show this weekend... they are way too big and they're junky... its horrible... plus it throws all the weight to one side...
Larryud45 2 years ago
should also mention that the molle bag that comes with it, you can put 5 normal m4 mags in it, and it fits tightly, so great to throw on yer molle backpack, belt, vest, whatever. :-)
meshuggahfan 3 years ago
C-mag was the first thing I bought when the communist gun ban expired....its SWEET!!
BrynMawrYamBag 3 years ago
Obama's a stupid nigger.
Deadperson213 3 years ago
ur a stupid racist -.-
SDKsa1 3 years ago
Its a great mag system! I have 13 of them and have never had a problem. Great for full auto shoots.
coltcomphbar 3 years ago
man 13 there not cheap what cals u have them
lastopher7 3 years ago
10 m16-ar15, and 3 mp5
coltcomphbar 3 years ago
nice but why youu got so many
lastopher7 3 years ago
Comment removed
coltcomphbar 3 years ago 7
ya maccain ist that great on sticken up for the 2A eather but obomba would shit on our rights
by the way is that what happend in 1994
lastopher7 3 years ago
I heard they wanted to make it permanent.
majormayhem1 3 years ago
@coltcomphbar
Wow you must be making crazy bucks now that Obama is in office and all our civil rights have gone out of the window, the cops just came and took all my guns and made me watch some liberal propaganda. Oh how different our lives are now compared to when Bush was in power, the freedom she is gone.
markraykhenberg 1 year ago
there are reports on DefendAmerica that allege the C-mag is frequently jamming and that soldiers disapprove of it. it puts stress on the magazine release system as well
5master11111 3 years ago
ya i could see why the thing wheighs allot
lastopher7 3 years ago
It's a shame they didn't make somthing easier to carry in webbing or on a vest. And LOL at the repeating of "Tactical supremecy"
dom1940 3 years ago
who could they make it easyer to carry
lastopher7 3 years ago
this is an old commercial look at the pistol grip an m16a2 and stock on m249
Fansler308 3 years ago
ya its deffanly old by the look of the guns
lastopher7 3 years ago
loks like a penis.....=P
pwnst4r 3 years ago
LOL, never mentioned the weight and mobility, and personal storage limitation of the C-mag.
deltafreelancer 3 years ago
well they compaired it to reglier mags but what is the personal storage limition
lastopher7 3 years ago
C-Mags are awesome but unawsomely expensive
btoku69 3 years ago
ya im not gona pay over 100 for a mag
lastopher7 3 years ago
You should develop for HK416 the future US army standard weapon, its perfect
moritsuna 3 years ago
i dont hinck there gunna use the 4 16
lastopher7 3 years ago
They have the HK 416 takes the same magazines as the M16/M4 style weapons so it can take this magazine.
Lord666Belial 3 years ago
duh
Fansler308 3 years ago
I was replying to the comment from moritsuna where he said they should develop a beta mag for the HK 416.
Lord666Belial 3 years ago
ya i dont see why he said duh
lastopher7 3 years ago
ya i dont see why he said duh
lastopher7 3 years ago
My wife and I got to shoot Springfield
Armory's SOCOM II. It was sweet. It is the
civilian version of the M-14. I was in the
Navy so have to depend on my Army friends.
They tell me that the M-14 was one of the best and most reliable weapons they used. Trying to talk my wife into letting me get one. Wish me luck!
raccoonbrat 4 years ago
ya thats a nice gun you could pick up a c mag for that
lastopher7 4 years ago
It would be heavy as hell to have 100 rounds of .308 under a m1a. Where do they sell ones for the m1a?
GotIt123 3 years ago
every where i go they say that they will have them in stock in 1 to 2 months but they never do
Fansler308 3 years ago
I get that same kind of run around here with Armalite uppers and 5.45 Wolf. It is impossible to get a straight answer with the big chain stores.
GotIt123 3 years ago
ya thats ture
lastopher7 3 years ago
It would be heavy as hell to have 100 rounds of .308 under a m1a. Where do they sell ones for the m1a?
GotIt123 3 years ago
..crap..double post...my bad.
GotIt123 3 years ago