Added: 2 years ago
From: njwildberger
Views: 4,694
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (9)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • Thank you for posting these videos. One thing I didn't fully understand from WT36 is why vector g is defined as g = lambda*a + (1-lambda)(d-a) instead of g = a + lambda(d-a). The end result is the same, so I guess it's the same one way or another, I just don't understand the rationale behind the first definition. I hope you could shine some light on this definition. Thanks in advance.

  • Thank you very much for your videos.

    

  • @8:30 - how did you solve for mu and ignore (1 - lambda)

  • @samruby82 nevermind got it. you go over the technique of treating any vectors as unique representations in the basis vectors in WildLinAlg2.

  • Terimkasih banyak pak BERGER...

  • Thanks a lot, That lesson is so great.

  • these lectures are so great !!!!!

  • This series is superb.

  • Great lesson.

Loading...
Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more