Thank you for posting these videos. One thing I didn't fully understand from WT36 is why vector g is defined as g = lambda*a + (1-lambda)(d-a) instead of g = a + lambda(d-a). The end result is the same, so I guess it's the same one way or another, I just don't understand the rationale behind the first definition. I hope you could shine some light on this definition. Thanks in advance.
Thank you for posting these videos. One thing I didn't fully understand from WT36 is why vector g is defined as g = lambda*a + (1-lambda)(d-a) instead of g = a + lambda(d-a). The end result is the same, so I guess it's the same one way or another, I just don't understand the rationale behind the first definition. I hope you could shine some light on this definition. Thanks in advance.
pvgelder1976 2 weeks ago in playlist WildTrig
Thank you very much for your videos.
neuraltap 5 months ago
@8:30 - how did you solve for mu and ignore (1 - lambda)
samruby82 1 year ago
@samruby82 nevermind got it. you go over the technique of treating any vectors as unique representations in the basis vectors in WildLinAlg2.
samruby82 11 months ago
Terimkasih banyak pak BERGER...
kahayan 1 year ago
Thanks a lot, That lesson is so great.
MultiBrados 1 year ago
these lectures are so great !!!!!
AenimaD4X 1 year ago
This series is superb.
peterhi503 2 years ago
Great lesson.
786HKHM 2 years ago