so many fucking stupid stoners here, makes my head spin. Grow the fuck up and stop wasting your life in a weed haze, where all you do is squirt out one conspiracy theory after another, i hate you all.
@behemuth - The only conspiracy theory is the one that the US Government put out on 9/11/01. Anyone who believes that nonsense is a vacuous robot and certainly no patriot at all.
@uutttg really? you mean the government that bush sat at the helm of, that is no longer in power, or has it become the evil jewish run government now that he is not at the helm anymore?
You are not a patriot if you suspect your own country of mass murder, nor do you make much sense considering the ensuring war have put you in a economical crisis.
this was 2001, and you can clearly see planes hitting the buildings, and they say they used holograms and other bullshit... really? grow up
@behemuth You're not looking at the evidence like most of the blue pill takers. You seem to be into a Road Runner physics believing commercial aircraft and jet fuel were responsible for the complete destruction of the WTC (7 buildings).
@mujaku oh? evidence you say? based on empirical scientific study of what happened? or random speculation by random morons you don't know?
Is this evidence for a energy weapon? let me ask you, what kind of energy weapon can do this? what fits the description? why don't you with all the evidence tell me. Or are you just gonna say "the energy weapons!!"? many EW's are known, none can do this, or even to metal in general.
@behemuth You need to take a lesson from Sherlock Holmes:
"How often have I said to you that when you have eliminated the impossible [fire and demolition], whatever remains [directed free-energy technology], however improbable, must be the truth?" [brackets mine]
@mujaku First of all, jet fuel burns at high enough temperature to severely weaken steel, to the point it cannot hold a fraction of its original weight. Which caused the towers to collapse. If that was a steel bar that turned to dust, instead of say concrete, then it is strange... but the answer should not be as random as energy weapons as imagined by sci fi movies, not as how they actually function in reality.
@behemuth Jet A and JP4 fire cannot burn a jet engine even under high pressure, so they are not going to weaken either the outer palisades or the massive core support columns. FEMA's 9/11 report states the jet fuel burned off after only a few minutes. In 1975 WTC North Tower was on fire (the 11th floor). It burned in temp. in excess of 1,292°F for 3 hours. No trusses were weakened or needed to be replaced. Nor was the core damaged.
@mujaku You do remember a 747 crashed into the tower right? that would weaken the building considerably, and even after a few minutes where a entire fuel tank is being combusted... the building would weaken even more. And if it burned out after a few minutes, the fire would still be going strong. This was on a whole other scale than in 1975, you can't really compare the two in the damages they could cause... a 747 filled with fuel obviously would do more damage.
@behemuth Nobody saw a plane hit the first tower. The only known film is blurry, showing no details. The second tower was allegedly hit by a 767 - not a 747. There is video, however, showing a spherical, wingless craft 39x17 hitting it - not a large Boeing. The weakening-the-building theory is untenable and unscientific based upon the solid design of the building itself. The FEMA report on 9/11 said that the jet fuel burned off after a few minutes.
@mujaku Yes it would burn off, but by that time the temperature would be very high, and would not drop fast considering the building was already on fire by that point...
As for the first plane hit, there are many who claim to have seen it, as for video... we got one by chance, not that many got cameras trimmed at every plane or at the WTC at any time you know.
As for the spherical wingless craft, nonsense... just another UFO "whats that i captured on film" nonsense...
@behemuth Kerosene fires just don't get that hot. Check out kerosene heaters, for example. In a jet engine the kerosene is put under pressure reaching much higher tempretures - not the same thing as burning on the 80th floor what little is left. I would not dismiss Richard D. Hall's analysis. Have you seen the video of the ball? If not check it out.
@mujaku Thing is... there were 20 odd plus stories above the crash point, and as you said.. there were little left. a plane just smashed into it at 500mph, the resulting fires would not have to melt or even severely weaken the steel/concrete/supports. it was already weakened by the impact. There is nothing odd of a skyscraper collapsing after being hit by a 747.
@behemuth It was not a 747. The supposed plane was a 767 and they can't fly that fast at low altitude because of the humidity. The alleged plane was going much slower (not 500 mph). An NBC live shot just before impact shows not a plane but a wingless ball. Check this out on YouTube: "New 9 11 Video Analysis by Richard D Hall (Part 1)" (3:31).
@mujaku So the answer would be directed energy weapons and secret prototype planes being used in broad daylight, headed towards a skyscraper in flames, over Manhattan during the busy hours of the day?
really? you think the government were able to plan and execute this, without leaks... and that was their plan?
@behemuth We have to follow the evidence - not avoid the evidence just because the evidence and what it implies is dissonant. Planes and fire didn't bring the buildings down - nor did a controlled demolition. And yes, there was a wingless sphere or ball - NBC video that escaped the censors shows this.
@mujaku you keep repeating the word evidence... just what is that footage (if real) evidence for? nothing... assuming it was not altered, it might as well be something coming from a off angle. It is certainly not evidence for DeW's or unknown aircraft, since it fits no description and was not seen or reported by anyone else. To make it into evidence for something is way too easy, i could claim it 9/11 was work of aliens and that footage could by your standards be evidence for that too.
@behemuth Where is your proof that a 747 crashed into the WTC at 500 mph? There is no clear video of a plane crashing into the first tower. As for the second, the only authentic non-Photoshopped footage shows a ball or orb, not your alleged 747!
@behemuth Boy, doesn't look like a 747 to me dude. The wingspan of a 747 is about 212 ft. while the width of WTC1 is 207 ft. So much for your "hard evidence". Here is the video about the ball hitting WTC2, the footage of which comes from NBC: watch?v=q4VQs57m4So
@mujaku ... you're just willfully ignoring evidence, thats all you're doing... That video was made by a private hand held device... and was released shortly after the planes hit. So it cannot have been tampered with. Secondly, you can even see part of the plane's wing being chipped off to the right of the tower, and the entire width of the power is seen being hit. How is it too small? You're talking as if it were a 50-100ft difference but it looks pretty accurate to your dimensions.
@mujaku So i'll be so coy as to suggest what many conspirators like to do... open your eyes... Cause that raw footage is clearly not a orb, but a large plane. You can even hear the jet engines.
What was said about the energy of tornadoes was what caught me. Years and years back, my Mother-in-law sent a letter about some things told to her by her nieces who were caught in a tornado in Topeka, Kansas. The strange happenings included all the cars being deposited in a certain area. Her niece went looking for her car, and found it, and when she unlocked the trunk, she found a fur coat inside that didn't belong to her, and apparently had somehow gotten into the locked trunk.
@Craziejane69 that is wild.it just reminded me,when an officer was going threw wreckage a day after tornado hit,and heard a baby crying,it led him to a pile of debris,where a Bedroom Bureau Drawer was standing upright,he heard the cry again,and started opening drawers,the third drawer he opened,lying naked was an infant,with 'No bruises,No scratches,No wounds what so-ever,the baby was sucked from mothers arms,into the eye of tornado,miles away.how did the baby get inside,n no harm
they used hollowgrams to fake the planes hitting the towars look at project blue beam we have this technology look at the i phone 5 thats coming out in has this technology in it
Why did it collapsed to dust, when anything of the Towers steel remained?! Only the concrete & all the wallboard was dust after the collapse, which was mysterious enough in case of the concrete! There was some concrete/steel melted together in the "Wtc meteorite", but that the steel went to dust is just a lie!!! Btw, the Hutchinson effect was never proven!
@74pbg Where is the 600 Miles of Structural Steel? The official story, claims it fell into the Basement. The Basements are nearly Empty. The "Wtc meteorite" is "Fused Material" NOT "Molten Steel". The Hutchinson Effect WAS Proven by Nikola Tesla in as early as 1893!
@74pbg Read the book "where di the towers go" it highlights it all. The hutchison effect was there alright, every effect he produces using his equipment happened at 9/11. Nobody said every single bit of steel and rubble was dustified, just most of it, i think the rubble pile as small as it was compared to what should have been there should speak volumes about how much steel should have been there. Can you explain where all that steel went? i dont think many of us can
@cyberbid The rubble pile should have been 12 percent of 110 storeys. Not even close. More troubling is the lack of seismic evidence. There were no P and S waves generated by the alleged falling chunks of the building. The strangest of all were magnetometer readings in Alaska and w. Canada during the time of 9/11. They were off the charts.
i swear these things look very old,as if they have aged hundreds or thousands of years.why did they replace the soil,why did a building have mold growing up the side,mold takes a long time to grow.why do the cars have rust,concrete and steel would turn to dust in time.but what if they invented a way to speed up time,on one area,would explain why they only found small bones,and no file cabinets,only paper,paper/plastic/rubber is the only thing that ages well,don't disintegrate.im freakin out man
heres a wild theory that would explain the cars,buildings,windows..and the mold that grew in building..they have technology that can "Age an area"..it looks as if,these things have been aged hundreds of years,focusing on the towers,but hitting small outer section,would explain why they fell in dust,and out of sequence,and explain whole glass missing,and mold growing seemingly in seconds,some fell at certain age,while others took longer,they actually showed us this in movie with a "time wave" Huh
@TheDrac3000 Your comment is interesting indeed! Just made me think of an episode of Ancient Aliens on season 3 called Aliens and evil places, in this episode it talks about 9 hikers that got mutilated under bizarre circumstances, more importantly some of the victims had internal wounds with no damage to the exterior skin or bones and some of the hikers aged in their 20's and 30's had aged to look they were in their 70's or 80's! UFO's were seen in the vicinity aswell
@cyberbid I'm going to check that out,about the hikers,sounds good...thanks,i thought i would hear a lot of neg. stuff on that...it does make you think though,we don't know what' kind of tech. they really have. and what i can't get over,are things like,mold,rust,missing glass,concrete turning to dust,soil disintegration..this happens with age,with these particular elements...just makes you think...peace friend!
thats what i've been saying...especially Now,when all these "so-called" new videos are coming out,,is this..why is their not "One video" that shows the 2nd plane hitting,from an avg. person on the street,even the new ones coming out now,from NY apts etc..filming 1st tower whole time,then skips to 2nd tower after its hit...their is not enough odds in the universe for this to be true..
U.S. Court system has obstructed every noble effort to bring 9/11 justice on many levels. Had Ms. Wood prevailed, trials for treason would have rightfully followed.
As it stands, all 3 branches of USGov have peddled "NOBLE LIES" regarding OK City, and both WTC attacks, peddling false "official" stories, pursuant to Title 50 USC "National Security."
Worse yet, the US Courts seal most evidence in all 9/11 cases, such as Pentagon footage. Never forget, US judges profit w/ NATL DEF stock they own.
when will david icke recognise this evidence and why does he allow his moderators on his forum sabotage this truth...ive been banned,andrew johnson is constantly attacked by a certain poster called 'stanrodd'....
its great to see dr judy woods research breaking out everywhere now...this truth cannot be stopped...when will alex jones recognise it? she was on rense dot com as well...thousands listen to his show
Other matters ignored by the American herd's Road Runner explanation of 9/11 (impossible events) such as why does almost all the falling debris have vapor trails? Normally, a falling steel beam, for example, would be falling without a vapor trail. What is actually happening in the 9/11 pictures is the vapor trails connected with the falling objects are, in fact, objects in the process of disintegrating while they fall, turning into fine dust!
You people have WAYYYYYY too much time on your hands. Next time you see the Presidential Freemason Illuminati Jewish Alien Antichrist with his HAARP gun tell me conspiracy geniuses.
Oh yeah, 1:47:25. A bullet will bounce off a steel girder--that's a very misleading analogy. A 767 going in excess of 500mph can certainly crash through the bolted-together steel facade of a building. The face of the WTC was NOT solid steel; it was a bunch of steel sections with spaces for the windows, all bolted together. You can see clearly by the shape of the hole, they just snapped. No laws of physics violated.
@belowthepovertyline okay so if the planes are the only thing that brought down the twin towers then how would you explain the third building that fell that day? or are you part of the many ignorant americans who don't even know a third building fell that day.
@daylatedollashort I'm well aware of WTC7, but whatever you think happened to it, it was not brought down by energy weapons. If you're in the controlled demo camp, that's fine, I'm not debating that. But these arguments in this video are ludicrous.
@belowthepovertyline your on a 911 conspiracy video, or corse there going to be ludicrous arguments. I honestly have no idea what happened to it, but i can tell you that there is some extremely sketchy shit involving 911. no sky scrapper in history has ever fallen from just fire alone, on this day it happened 3 times. not to mention they "never found the black boxes" the odds of not finding any of the 4 black boxes is less than 1%.
@daylatedollashort I can't tell you what happened to the black boxes from the NY planes, so I can't argue that for sure. They did recover the ones for flights 77 and 93, and the transcripts were released for the latter. Yeah, it's a conspiracy video here, but there's not going to be any resolution because JW's "science" isn't science. To MOST of us with a science background, her theories don't make any sense.
Her answer to everything, "Well, I just look at the evidence" is so fucking old. It's been TEN YEARS. Get to a point, any point. If you see a connection between Erin and 9/11, state it clearly.
And please, those jumpers jumped. You don't have to read minds to figure out a reason--people do that when they can't escape a fire, it's happened many times. That's silly and disrespectful.
Perhaps it's been 10 years because people have been bickering over theories instead of looking at the evidence (with a sense of awe and humility, rather than ego and uptightness).
RE: jumpers. They were not on fire, they were not even dirty with soot or scorched and they were mostly hanging out of the windows meaning they had air.
Yet they chose to jump to a certain death???
Perhaps if they had been on fire, but otherwise it makes no sense.
@project3ss Yes, it does make sense. People jump because of heat and smoke and seeing that escape is impossible--the women did it in the Triangle Shirtwaist factory fire and people did it in the Joelma fire in Brazil. For the latter, there's a video right here on youtube. That's the truth, and it's a far better explanation than them being hit with an energy weapon.
I really don't know enough about the credibility of Dr Woods background or the background of directed energy weapons and there existence, so it's frustrating trying to piece together whether they are on to something or just reading too far into evidence that is shaky to begin with, i.e. poor camera quality (disappearing columns)
Something else went on that day, WTC 7 is always the card that trumps all others,I'm just not sure we're going to know for sure for many, many years.
@SupersonicUK One major clue that something "different" happened to the towers than the official explanation is that there was insufficient seismic signature detected from huge amounts of building debris hitting the ground; the buildings appeared to just "dustify", the facts tend to agree.
you are all Stupid IT WAS A COMMERCIAL AIRLINER HIJACKED BY TERRORIST you have not seen the origianal video you have seen videos being edited already by anti-americans deleting the aircraft ah i smell kids here and villains
you are all Stupid IT WAS A COMMERCIAL AIRLINER HIJACKED BY TERRORIST you have seen not the origianal video being edited already by anti-americans deleting the aircraft
@Junglhorse: Your grandiloquence rates preposterous --- it is not about this or that political movement that is under consideration, it is determination of facts that Dr. Judy Wood et al strives to establish, re the 9 11 event(s); specifically, what became of a) the twin towers, b) building 7, c) what occurred with certain peripheral vicinity anomalies, d) what continued to occur at the site in the protracted aftermath of the event(s), e) evaluation of extant analysts' reports
Hope you're not confusing Saturn with Satan, totally different roots. Saturn was the Roman god of agriculture. Saturnalia a huge party following the harvest, much like Thanksgiving, but probably also involving intoxicants. In terms of Saturna Aggregate, Saturna is the name of the nearby (to me) island from which it was mined.
@cynthiav67 the buildings were designed to withstand the impact of commercial airliners. The engineers said they would probably withstand multiple impacts. I dont believe the planes brought them down, but i sure as hell dont believe it was directed energy weapons.
REVIEW SERIES, re eg, nano-crystalline and quasi-crystalline structures, as per inert gas techniques for creation of nano-materials: preparation of nano-materials by divergent routes: see this Indian VID series on u-tube: Lec-3 Nano Crystalline Materials ... there are many illuminating relevant parts to this stellar series ..... Lec-17 Mechanical Alloying; Lec-16 Rapid Solidification Processing. Thanks Dr Wood, intriguing perspective, worthy, too, of nano-analysis.
Ashayana Deane, Voyagers II, p.407-410. [published in 2002!] --- There you have your "directed energy weapon". Actually it was a sub-atomic Sonic Pulse/Beam released by the "Jehovian-Anunnaki" to fully activate their wormhole system. WTC is right above the Manhatten Vortex .The "terrorist attacks" were staged to create a public smoke screen should these Sonic Pulses cause damage/collapse of the buildings. Matches perfectly with the empirical record: Nanothermite + "Hutchison-Effect"!
Here's a fun thought, to those who are familiar with Judy Wood. The eye of hurricane Erin (2001) was geometric. Saturn's pole is geometric. Jupiter has a strange spot on it and one of it's bands is about to reappear. Juno is en route to Jupiter to "Explore and study Jupiter’s magnetosphere near the planet’s poles, especially the auroras..." Thunderstorm Solar Power Satellite? How much direct-able energy could Jupiter and Saturn generate between them? Just some things I find TERRIBLY interesting.
people have to come to terms with the fact that the majority of the steel in that building did not hit the ground. period. basic physics proves this. advanced physics explains what you see going on. do research, stop speculation
Assuming that planes did indeed hit the buildings, could they not have dissolved quickly like the buildings did? That would explain why there is little to no evidence of them, wouldn't it?
@LeeAnn663 They didn't dissolve (it's not a solute/solvent issue).
But yes, there was little evidence of the planes because they were mostly destroyed in the impacts. Hitting a skyscraper with tons of jet fuel will do that.
@LeeAnn663 newton tells us that yes, since the Harder and Denser material dissolved, then the (comparativly) light and weak plane should "dissolve" also, but that still doesnt explain why there isnt a 200,000 metric ton pile of steel beams at the base when this is over, which one would expect from a fire and kinetic damage from a fall. i Dare you to light a tank on fire, drop it off a cliff, and watch it disappear....
I wish Dr Judy the best of luck she can possibly receive. I had two accounts on scribd in dedication to this matter, with multiple evidence, and twice the accounts were removed with no warning or explanation.
Stupid question wxhy the car turn upside down from the shock blast of the falling tons and tons of debris , why why why you keep on asking why because you have no bloody idea why it was why you people are making your own imagination
@ 30:35 Dr. Wood says: "I'm not proposing at all, a ray beam from outer space. That is not what this is about. This is about an energy field. An interference of energy fields."
This theory is interesting but the only problem I have with it is kinda the same as the rest of the people, evidence but no conclusions, she goes as far as to say directed energy weapons were used, but won't say where they come from. I mean you have to have some kind of theory where it came from if you're going to say it was used.
@MetalHeadKLR650 I think you're asking too much. It's like people asking Richard Gage who the real culprits were. It's not his job - he's an architect, and studies buildings. Dr Wood is a scientist. Neither of them are criminal investigators. They just present the evidence - it's an entirely different field of expertise in determining the surrounding circumstances.
She gives a terrible interview. She should have someone else present the evidence for her. ITs intruiging but when you listen to her its not believable
The photos of burnt out cars with tires and seats left intact is consistent with other photos documented. Meaning that the photos Judy Woods has produced of the burnt cars is not unusual .
I would find it unusual if there were any evidence that the cars were on FDR Drive when they actually caught fire. Being four blocks away from the WTC demoltion would make that very suspicious. However, maybe FDR Drive was only used to stockpile burnt cars that were towed in from the WTC site and fires
Bottom Line...The Luciferians have their hands on the button. Most of these idiots die off, except the Jesuits. These demons are constant. They have had posession of Directed Energy since the 1980's. They murder people left right and centre, even their own Cardinals are afraid of them.To save the career of their own Puppet, Prime Minister, in Ireland, Bertie Ahearn, they murdered his opponent in Moscow, Liam Lawlor, also Ahearns local priest Father Kennedy, Iona Rd, murdered 2004. RIP.
@letsgomd Wow - no evidence referenced for your accusations - then you dive off into other matters not even mentioned in this video. Isn't this itself a clear indication of disinformation at work? Looks that way to me. So where is the Nano-thermite/thermite based court case or other legal action? I think you'll find it doesn't exist. If you google "thermite free rfc" (or look for that video on my channel), you will find out why.
This is The JFK Thing All Over Again...Sadly We Wont Ever Know The Truth Until The Conspirators Are All Long Dead & Gone....This is Some Pretty Compelling Evidence, But I Lean Towards a Combination of Nano-Thermite, Explosives & Some Type of Microwave or Plasma Weapon...This Isn't Any Great Consolation to The People Who Lost Loved Ones on 911, But Every Action in Life Has Either a Negative or Positive Return & That Applies to Everyone.......
Woods, to me was the first one to make sense of the DEMOLITIONS of the towers. Her education is impeccable. And, it makes sense when you consider the speed of the collapse and the outlying unusual damage. I believe this is the Hutchinson effect on steroids. Or, more likely some deep level five beta test in real time. The deaths were an ancillary benefit to the neo cons to institute their wars so as to provide the trillions they wanted to steal. The business of U.S.A is war and business is good.
WHERE DID THE BUILDINGS GO? 2. Concrete is a mixture of cement, sand and aggregate. Cement is a powder of limestone (calcuim carbonate) and clay. Aggregate is small rock or gravel. Concrete varies in weight according to type of aggregate used. I have held a type called Saturna Aggregate, a volcanic minteral so light it floats in water, used for making lightest weight concrete. Of what was towers' concrete composed? How much did it weigh?
WHERE DID THE BUILDINGS GO? 1. The award winning innovative feature of this at the time new type of tower design was that it used less material and provided greater rentable space than types hitherto used. Most of the material consisted of steel columns, concrete floors, and light gauge steel trusses. We know that the concrete was pulverized and distributed throughout Manhattan. We know that the basement was 60-70 ft deep, deep enough to hold most of remaining material?
DISSOLVING STEEL COLUMN, which is the main stimulus for this theory. I'm thinking it's a combination of two things. The column section is breaking and tipping as it falls, disturbing the cement-dust laden air, and the cameraman is doing a fade-out. Net result is a ghostly apparition of where the column had been before it dropped out of picture.
Burnt out police car with rust holes in floor between seats (if I've understood correctly): Seems to me these "rust holes" are more likely to have been screw holes to which the support stand for the cop's computer was anchored.
Trucks carting in and removing soil (1:21:38) is called site remediation, removing toxins. Laws determine a maximum contaminatiion for material dumped into the ocean. Instead of one highly contaminated bargeful (above the legal limit), you bring in fresh uncontaminated soil to dilure, and then you dump five bargefuls. The guy around 1:20 is washing off the hose of his pump which has presumably been in a contaminated liquid that he doesn't want to bring home.
For me, this is a new theory. I've seen nano-termites, thermonuclear charges and a couple of others. The intriguing thing is not which is right or wrong, but how all of them offer a more plausible explantion than the official 9/11 account.
@stepthrutuner After 25 mins of it, I'd say she's making quite a bit of sense, enough to keep me viewing and to go looking for other pro & con points of view.
@stepthrutuner You are most likely right, but until we have a theory that adequately explains events, it is best not to summarily dismiss alternatives. IMO it's better to review and analyze and use logic to explain and refute. I'm assuming that you are not content with the official version, otherwise why would you be clicking on this kind of stuff at all? Good thing about this video was that it reminded me of the dissolving column, which I'd been puzzled by 10 years ago.
@nebula25x That's great! I stand corrected. Unfortunately there's no platform for these "credible" people to be heard from other than youtube and "fringe" sites... which I don't think broadly sweeps them aside - just it's much harder for the general public to get on board. What's the solution? Ron Paul!
While I don't believe the official story - I certainly don't think some lady in her 50's skyping us through what she believes is the "silver bullet" theory - yeah... I'll pass on this one.
Unless it's from credible, established, licensed and hands on investigators - it's all conjecture and quackery till then!
WTC1 & 2 weighed 500,000 tons each, & WTC7 weighed 40,000 tons? There should be 1,040,000 tons of collapsed debris. How much of it was dustified & where did the dust go? How much of it has been received at the various places it was supposedly taken away to for recycling & whatever? Do the photos show the full picture or just a partial one? Is the evidence misleading?
im still on the fence about this new theory Judy woods has came out with, I agree that 9/11 was an inside job but i think the David Ray Griffin Theory is more accurate
Judy Wood is one of these techies who is almost inarticulate. It's really quite funny. Whatever you wanna call it it's directed weapon that's a weapon with energy which is directed it isn't kinetic energy that's something differnt ya just have ta look at the evidence these people repeat what they're told because it's what they bin told so they just repeat it it seems to be a new type a weapon it looks like cylindrtical holes they are real round scaling it they look bigger when you look closer
I HAVE read what YOU'VE said, but YOU'RE NOT getting the point.
It takes ages to get through the FACTS that the planes are forged, you hinder the info, thus making it look less valid to your viewers! You have a vital role as mediator to the viewers.
Anrdew Johson looked well pissed off with you! haha have a look at it again!?!?
It could've done with solid evidence for the plane forgery, generally it's a great explaination of the crazy physics involved.
so many fucking stupid stoners here, makes my head spin. Grow the fuck up and stop wasting your life in a weed haze, where all you do is squirt out one conspiracy theory after another, i hate you all.
behemuth 2 weeks ago
@behemuth - The only conspiracy theory is the one that the US Government put out on 9/11/01. Anyone who believes that nonsense is a vacuous robot and certainly no patriot at all.
uutttg 2 weeks ago
@uutttg really? you mean the government that bush sat at the helm of, that is no longer in power, or has it become the evil jewish run government now that he is not at the helm anymore?
You are not a patriot if you suspect your own country of mass murder, nor do you make much sense considering the ensuring war have put you in a economical crisis.
this was 2001, and you can clearly see planes hitting the buildings, and they say they used holograms and other bullshit... really? grow up
behemuth 2 weeks ago
@behemuth You're not looking at the evidence like most of the blue pill takers. You seem to be into a Road Runner physics believing commercial aircraft and jet fuel were responsible for the complete destruction of the WTC (7 buildings).
mujaku 2 weeks ago
@mujaku oh? evidence you say? based on empirical scientific study of what happened? or random speculation by random morons you don't know?
Is this evidence for a energy weapon? let me ask you, what kind of energy weapon can do this? what fits the description? why don't you with all the evidence tell me. Or are you just gonna say "the energy weapons!!"? many EW's are known, none can do this, or even to metal in general.
behemuth 2 weeks ago
@behemuth You need to take a lesson from Sherlock Holmes:
"How often have I said to you that when you have eliminated the impossible [fire and demolition], whatever remains [directed free-energy technology], however improbable, must be the truth?" [brackets mine]
mujaku 2 weeks ago
@mujaku First of all, jet fuel burns at high enough temperature to severely weaken steel, to the point it cannot hold a fraction of its original weight. Which caused the towers to collapse. If that was a steel bar that turned to dust, instead of say concrete, then it is strange... but the answer should not be as random as energy weapons as imagined by sci fi movies, not as how they actually function in reality.
behemuth 2 weeks ago
@behemuth Jet A and JP4 fire cannot burn a jet engine even under high pressure, so they are not going to weaken either the outer palisades or the massive core support columns. FEMA's 9/11 report states the jet fuel burned off after only a few minutes. In 1975 WTC North Tower was on fire (the 11th floor). It burned in temp. in excess of 1,292°F for 3 hours. No trusses were weakened or needed to be replaced. Nor was the core damaged.
mujaku 2 weeks ago
@mujaku You do remember a 747 crashed into the tower right? that would weaken the building considerably, and even after a few minutes where a entire fuel tank is being combusted... the building would weaken even more. And if it burned out after a few minutes, the fire would still be going strong. This was on a whole other scale than in 1975, you can't really compare the two in the damages they could cause... a 747 filled with fuel obviously would do more damage.
behemuth 1 week ago
@behemuth Nobody saw a plane hit the first tower. The only known film is blurry, showing no details. The second tower was allegedly hit by a 767 - not a 747. There is video, however, showing a spherical, wingless craft 39x17 hitting it - not a large Boeing. The weakening-the-building theory is untenable and unscientific based upon the solid design of the building itself. The FEMA report on 9/11 said that the jet fuel burned off after a few minutes.
mujaku 1 week ago
@mujaku Yes it would burn off, but by that time the temperature would be very high, and would not drop fast considering the building was already on fire by that point...
As for the first plane hit, there are many who claim to have seen it, as for video... we got one by chance, not that many got cameras trimmed at every plane or at the WTC at any time you know.
As for the spherical wingless craft, nonsense... just another UFO "whats that i captured on film" nonsense...
behemuth 1 week ago
@behemuth Kerosene fires just don't get that hot. Check out kerosene heaters, for example. In a jet engine the kerosene is put under pressure reaching much higher tempretures - not the same thing as burning on the 80th floor what little is left. I would not dismiss Richard D. Hall's analysis. Have you seen the video of the ball? If not check it out.
mujaku 1 week ago
@mujaku Thing is... there were 20 odd plus stories above the crash point, and as you said.. there were little left. a plane just smashed into it at 500mph, the resulting fires would not have to melt or even severely weaken the steel/concrete/supports. it was already weakened by the impact. There is nothing odd of a skyscraper collapsing after being hit by a 747.
behemuth 1 week ago
@behemuth It was not a 747. The supposed plane was a 767 and they can't fly that fast at low altitude because of the humidity. The alleged plane was going much slower (not 500 mph). An NBC live shot just before impact shows not a plane but a wingless ball. Check this out on YouTube: "New 9 11 Video Analysis by Richard D Hall (Part 1)" (3:31).
mujaku 1 week ago
@mujaku So the answer would be directed energy weapons and secret prototype planes being used in broad daylight, headed towards a skyscraper in flames, over Manhattan during the busy hours of the day?
really? you think the government were able to plan and execute this, without leaks... and that was their plan?
behemuth 1 week ago
@behemuth We have to follow the evidence - not avoid the evidence just because the evidence and what it implies is dissonant. Planes and fire didn't bring the buildings down - nor did a controlled demolition. And yes, there was a wingless sphere or ball - NBC video that escaped the censors shows this.
mujaku 1 week ago
@mujaku you keep repeating the word evidence... just what is that footage (if real) evidence for? nothing... assuming it was not altered, it might as well be something coming from a off angle. It is certainly not evidence for DeW's or unknown aircraft, since it fits no description and was not seen or reported by anyone else. To make it into evidence for something is way too easy, i could claim it 9/11 was work of aliens and that footage could by your standards be evidence for that too.
behemuth 1 week ago
@behemuth Where is your proof that a 747 crashed into the WTC at 500 mph? There is no clear video of a plane crashing into the first tower. As for the second, the only authentic non-Photoshopped footage shows a ball or orb, not your alleged 747!
mujaku 1 week ago
@mujaku ... do you even do research? here's proof for one:
watch?v=r6B7g6mt4Gk
And how will you respond to this hard evidence... i so wonder... does that look like a orb to you?
behemuth 1 week ago
@behemuth Boy, doesn't look like a 747 to me dude. The wingspan of a 747 is about 212 ft. while the width of WTC1 is 207 ft. So much for your "hard evidence". Here is the video about the ball hitting WTC2, the footage of which comes from NBC: watch?v=q4VQs57m4So
mujaku 1 week ago
@mujaku ... you're just willfully ignoring evidence, thats all you're doing... That video was made by a private hand held device... and was released shortly after the planes hit. So it cannot have been tampered with. Secondly, you can even see part of the plane's wing being chipped off to the right of the tower, and the entire width of the power is seen being hit. How is it too small? You're talking as if it were a 50-100ft difference but it looks pretty accurate to your dimensions.
behemuth 1 week ago
@mujaku So i'll be so coy as to suggest what many conspirators like to do... open your eyes... Cause that raw footage is clearly not a orb, but a large plane. You can even hear the jet engines.
behemuth 1 week ago
sorry i couldnt watch this because her voice was so annoying and she just sounded so stupid.
nitrams2011 1 month ago
What was said about the energy of tornadoes was what caught me. Years and years back, my Mother-in-law sent a letter about some things told to her by her nieces who were caught in a tornado in Topeka, Kansas. The strange happenings included all the cars being deposited in a certain area. Her niece went looking for her car, and found it, and when she unlocked the trunk, she found a fur coat inside that didn't belong to her, and apparently had somehow gotten into the locked trunk.
Craziejane69 1 month ago
@Craziejane69 that is wild.it just reminded me,when an officer was going threw wreckage a day after tornado hit,and heard a baby crying,it led him to a pile of debris,where a Bedroom Bureau Drawer was standing upright,he heard the cry again,and started opening drawers,the third drawer he opened,lying naked was an infant,with 'No bruises,No scratches,No wounds what so-ever,the baby was sucked from mothers arms,into the eye of tornado,miles away.how did the baby get inside,n no harm
TheDrac3000 3 weeks ago
they used hollowgrams to fake the planes hitting the towars look at project blue beam we have this technology look at the i phone 5 thats coming out in has this technology in it
LOPRESTI68 1 month ago
Why did it collapsed to dust, when anything of the Towers steel remained?! Only the concrete & all the wallboard was dust after the collapse, which was mysterious enough in case of the concrete! There was some concrete/steel melted together in the "Wtc meteorite", but that the steel went to dust is just a lie!!! Btw, the Hutchinson effect was never proven!
74pbg 2 months ago
@74pbg Where is the 600 Miles of Structural Steel? The official story, claims it fell into the Basement. The Basements are nearly Empty. The "Wtc meteorite" is "Fused Material" NOT "Molten Steel". The Hutchinson Effect WAS Proven by Nikola Tesla in as early as 1893!
disney9139 2 months ago
@74pbg Read the book "where di the towers go" it highlights it all. The hutchison effect was there alright, every effect he produces using his equipment happened at 9/11. Nobody said every single bit of steel and rubble was dustified, just most of it, i think the rubble pile as small as it was compared to what should have been there should speak volumes about how much steel should have been there. Can you explain where all that steel went? i dont think many of us can
cyberbid 3 weeks ago
@cyberbid The rubble pile should have been 12 percent of 110 storeys. Not even close. More troubling is the lack of seismic evidence. There were no P and S waves generated by the alleged falling chunks of the building. The strangest of all were magnetometer readings in Alaska and w. Canada during the time of 9/11. They were off the charts.
mujaku 2 weeks ago
i swear these things look very old,as if they have aged hundreds or thousands of years.why did they replace the soil,why did a building have mold growing up the side,mold takes a long time to grow.why do the cars have rust,concrete and steel would turn to dust in time.but what if they invented a way to speed up time,on one area,would explain why they only found small bones,and no file cabinets,only paper,paper/plastic/rubber is the only thing that ages well,don't disintegrate.im freakin out man
TheDrac3000 2 months ago in playlist More videos from chasluim34
heres a wild theory that would explain the cars,buildings,windows..and the mold that grew in building..they have technology that can "Age an area"..it looks as if,these things have been aged hundreds of years,focusing on the towers,but hitting small outer section,would explain why they fell in dust,and out of sequence,and explain whole glass missing,and mold growing seemingly in seconds,some fell at certain age,while others took longer,they actually showed us this in movie with a "time wave" Huh
TheDrac3000 2 months ago in playlist More videos from chasluim34
@TheDrac3000 i'm freakin freaking out man... thinking about this.
TheDrac3000 2 months ago in playlist More videos from chasluim34
@TheDrac3000 Your comment is interesting indeed! Just made me think of an episode of Ancient Aliens on season 3 called Aliens and evil places, in this episode it talks about 9 hikers that got mutilated under bizarre circumstances, more importantly some of the victims had internal wounds with no damage to the exterior skin or bones and some of the hikers aged in their 20's and 30's had aged to look they were in their 70's or 80's! UFO's were seen in the vicinity aswell
cyberbid 3 weeks ago
@cyberbid I'm going to check that out,about the hikers,sounds good...thanks,i thought i would hear a lot of neg. stuff on that...it does make you think though,we don't know what' kind of tech. they really have. and what i can't get over,are things like,mold,rust,missing glass,concrete turning to dust,soil disintegration..this happens with age,with these particular elements...just makes you think...peace friend!
TheDrac3000 3 weeks ago
thats what i've been saying...especially Now,when all these "so-called" new videos are coming out,,is this..why is their not "One video" that shows the 2nd plane hitting,from an avg. person on the street,even the new ones coming out now,from NY apts etc..filming 1st tower whole time,then skips to 2nd tower after its hit...their is not enough odds in the universe for this to be true..
TheDrac3000 2 months ago in playlist More videos from chasluim34
U.S. Court system has obstructed every noble effort to bring 9/11 justice on many levels. Had Ms. Wood prevailed, trials for treason would have rightfully followed.
As it stands, all 3 branches of USGov have peddled "NOBLE LIES" regarding OK City, and both WTC attacks, peddling false "official" stories, pursuant to Title 50 USC "National Security."
Worse yet, the US Courts seal most evidence in all 9/11 cases, such as Pentagon footage. Never forget, US judges profit w/ NATL DEF stock they own.
dpetrano 2 months ago
when will david icke recognise this evidence and why does he allow his moderators on his forum sabotage this truth...ive been banned,andrew johnson is constantly attacked by a certain poster called 'stanrodd'....
masonfreeparty 2 months ago
its great to see dr judy woods research breaking out everywhere now...this truth cannot be stopped...when will alex jones recognise it? she was on rense dot com as well...thousands listen to his show
masonfreeparty 2 months ago
Other matters ignored by the American herd's Road Runner explanation of 9/11 (impossible events) such as why does almost all the falling debris have vapor trails? Normally, a falling steel beam, for example, would be falling without a vapor trail. What is actually happening in the 9/11 pictures is the vapor trails connected with the falling objects are, in fact, objects in the process of disintegrating while they fall, turning into fine dust!
mujaku 2 months ago 2
You people have WAYYYYYY too much time on your hands. Next time you see the Presidential Freemason Illuminati Jewish Alien Antichrist with his HAARP gun tell me conspiracy geniuses.
TopstillSpinning2888 3 months ago
Oh yeah, 1:47:25. A bullet will bounce off a steel girder--that's a very misleading analogy. A 767 going in excess of 500mph can certainly crash through the bolted-together steel facade of a building. The face of the WTC was NOT solid steel; it was a bunch of steel sections with spaces for the windows, all bolted together. You can see clearly by the shape of the hole, they just snapped. No laws of physics violated.
belowthepovertyline 3 months ago
@belowthepovertyline okay so if the planes are the only thing that brought down the twin towers then how would you explain the third building that fell that day? or are you part of the many ignorant americans who don't even know a third building fell that day.
daylatedollashort 3 months ago
@daylatedollashort I'm well aware of WTC7, but whatever you think happened to it, it was not brought down by energy weapons. If you're in the controlled demo camp, that's fine, I'm not debating that. But these arguments in this video are ludicrous.
belowthepovertyline 3 months ago
@belowthepovertyline your on a 911 conspiracy video, or corse there going to be ludicrous arguments. I honestly have no idea what happened to it, but i can tell you that there is some extremely sketchy shit involving 911. no sky scrapper in history has ever fallen from just fire alone, on this day it happened 3 times. not to mention they "never found the black boxes" the odds of not finding any of the 4 black boxes is less than 1%.
daylatedollashort 3 months ago
@daylatedollashort I can't tell you what happened to the black boxes from the NY planes, so I can't argue that for sure. They did recover the ones for flights 77 and 93, and the transcripts were released for the latter. Yeah, it's a conspiracy video here, but there's not going to be any resolution because JW's "science" isn't science. To MOST of us with a science background, her theories don't make any sense.
belowthepovertyline 3 months ago
Her answer to everything, "Well, I just look at the evidence" is so fucking old. It's been TEN YEARS. Get to a point, any point. If you see a connection between Erin and 9/11, state it clearly.
And please, those jumpers jumped. You don't have to read minds to figure out a reason--people do that when they can't escape a fire, it's happened many times. That's silly and disrespectful.
belowthepovertyline 3 months ago
@belowthepovertyline "It's been TEN YEARS"
Perhaps it's been 10 years because people have been bickering over theories instead of looking at the evidence (with a sense of awe and humility, rather than ego and uptightness).
RE: jumpers. They were not on fire, they were not even dirty with soot or scorched and they were mostly hanging out of the windows meaning they had air.
Yet they chose to jump to a certain death???
Perhaps if they had been on fire, but otherwise it makes no sense.
project3ss 3 months ago
@project3ss Yes, it does make sense. People jump because of heat and smoke and seeing that escape is impossible--the women did it in the Triangle Shirtwaist factory fire and people did it in the Joelma fire in Brazil. For the latter, there's a video right here on youtube. That's the truth, and it's a far better explanation than them being hit with an energy weapon.
belowthepovertyline 3 months ago
Watch for Demitri Khalezov. He can explain what is behing the distification and the long life heat spots.
Freiheitstraeumer 3 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
the interviewer is a slug and needs a dick up his ass, better video is "Dr.judy wood- Where Did the Towers Go?"
sirpico123 3 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
SUPPORT THE SEPT 11TH RESEARCH AND DISCOVERY PROJECT!
SUBSCRIBE TODAY!
Sept11Discovery 3 months ago
And obviously these people are not metallurgist
layneblevins100 3 months ago
There were also 5 stories underground along with a subway
layneblevins100 3 months ago
Bullshit the towers were hit by planes I was there don't you even dare say it was fake
layneblevins100 3 months ago
What a dreadful interview - shame- it could haver been so good.
Hensen1954 4 months ago
Its unfortunate, that the lady in America is poorly recorded, and not very good at explanation, and the interviewer is also a bit woolly.
Hensen1954 4 months ago
I really don't know enough about the credibility of Dr Woods background or the background of directed energy weapons and there existence, so it's frustrating trying to piece together whether they are on to something or just reading too far into evidence that is shaky to begin with, i.e. poor camera quality (disappearing columns)
Something else went on that day, WTC 7 is always the card that trumps all others,I'm just not sure we're going to know for sure for many, many years.
SupersonicUK 4 months ago
@SupersonicUK One major clue that something "different" happened to the towers than the official explanation is that there was insufficient seismic signature detected from huge amounts of building debris hitting the ground; the buildings appeared to just "dustify", the facts tend to agree.
anotherblonde 3 months ago
OMG what ur ass the FBI and the CIA hide a mic in ur ass and they fallow u !!!!!!
bobilator1 4 months ago
you are all Stupid IT WAS A COMMERCIAL AIRLINER HIJACKED BY TERRORIST you have not seen the origianal video you have seen videos being edited already by anti-americans deleting the aircraft ah i smell kids here and villains
ceboym 4 months ago
you are all Stupid IT WAS A COMMERCIAL AIRLINER HIJACKED BY TERRORIST you have seen not the origianal video being edited already by anti-americans deleting the aircraft
ceboym 4 months ago
@Junglhorse: Your grandiloquence rates preposterous --- it is not about this or that political movement that is under consideration, it is determination of facts that Dr. Judy Wood et al strives to establish, re the 9 11 event(s); specifically, what became of a) the twin towers, b) building 7, c) what occurred with certain peripheral vicinity anomalies, d) what continued to occur at the site in the protracted aftermath of the event(s), e) evaluation of extant analysts' reports
CarCriticAssessor 4 months ago
see rosieandthecat
rosemarypcancellieri 4 months ago
Hope you're not confusing Saturn with Satan, totally different roots. Saturn was the Roman god of agriculture. Saturnalia a huge party following the harvest, much like Thanksgiving, but probably also involving intoxicants. In terms of Saturna Aggregate, Saturna is the name of the nearby (to me) island from which it was mined.
FirstUsedBooks 4 months ago
Yes, it was a directed energy weapon, to hell with the fact commercial jets packed with tons of jet fuel crashed into the buildings...
cynthiav67 5 months ago
@cynthiav67 the buildings were designed to withstand the impact of commercial airliners. The engineers said they would probably withstand multiple impacts. I dont believe the planes brought them down, but i sure as hell dont believe it was directed energy weapons.
dominic150 5 months ago
@cynthiav67 and i guess to hell with the fact that fire cant melt or weken steel like that?
HigherrConsciousness 5 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
REVIEW SERIES, re eg, nano-crystalline and quasi-crystalline structures, as per inert gas techniques for creation of nano-materials: preparation of nano-materials by divergent routes: see this Indian VID series on u-tube: Lec-3 Nano Crystalline Materials ... there are many illuminating relevant parts to this stellar series ..... Lec-17 Mechanical Alloying; Lec-16 Rapid Solidification Processing. Thanks Dr Wood, intriguing perspective, worthy, too, of nano-analysis.
CarCriticAssessor 5 months ago
Ashayana Deane, Voyagers II, p.407-410. [published in 2002!] --- There you have your "directed energy weapon". Actually it was a sub-atomic Sonic Pulse/Beam released by the "Jehovian-Anunnaki" to fully activate their wormhole system. WTC is right above the Manhatten Vortex .The "terrorist attacks" were staged to create a public smoke screen should these Sonic Pulses cause damage/collapse of the buildings. Matches perfectly with the empirical record: Nanothermite + "Hutchison-Effect"!
Mikro1312 5 months ago
Here's a fun thought, to those who are familiar with Judy Wood. The eye of hurricane Erin (2001) was geometric. Saturn's pole is geometric. Jupiter has a strange spot on it and one of it's bands is about to reappear. Juno is en route to Jupiter to "Explore and study Jupiter’s magnetosphere near the planet’s poles, especially the auroras..." Thunderstorm Solar Power Satellite? How much direct-able energy could Jupiter and Saturn generate between them? Just some things I find TERRIBLY interesting.
HomogenizingHegemony 5 months ago
people have to come to terms with the fact that the majority of the steel in that building did not hit the ground. period. basic physics proves this. advanced physics explains what you see going on. do research, stop speculation
mfrank165 5 months ago
Assuming that planes did indeed hit the buildings, could they not have dissolved quickly like the buildings did? That would explain why there is little to no evidence of them, wouldn't it?
LeeAnn663 5 months ago
@LeeAnn663 They didn't dissolve (it's not a solute/solvent issue).
But yes, there was little evidence of the planes because they were mostly destroyed in the impacts. Hitting a skyscraper with tons of jet fuel will do that.
10 years later, this is still a question?
belowthepovertyline 5 months ago
@belowthepovertyline jet fuel can't vaporize planes and buildings.
TSMPimpDaddyPain 5 months ago
@TSMPimpDaddyPain Troll puts words in my mouth.
belowthepovertyline 5 months ago
@belowthepovertyline oh no, you called me a troll because I made you look like a fool. Great, original comeback.
TSMPimpDaddyPain 5 months ago
Assuming that planes did indeed hit the buildings, could they not have dissolved quickly like the buildings did?
LeeAnn663 5 months ago
@LeeAnn663 newton tells us that yes, since the Harder and Denser material dissolved, then the (comparativly) light and weak plane should "dissolve" also, but that still doesnt explain why there isnt a 200,000 metric ton pile of steel beams at the base when this is over, which one would expect from a fire and kinetic damage from a fall. i Dare you to light a tank on fire, drop it off a cliff, and watch it disappear....
mfrank165 5 months ago
Um yeah, i'm not convinced.
the1log 6 months ago
I wish Dr Judy the best of luck she can possibly receive. I had two accounts on scribd in dedication to this matter, with multiple evidence, and twice the accounts were removed with no warning or explanation.
sackfulofnews 6 months ago
@friedstuffable Simpsons did it.
HomersIlliad 6 months ago
Stupid question wxhy the car turn upside down from the shock blast of the falling tons and tons of debris , why why why you keep on asking why because you have no bloody idea why it was why you people are making your own imagination
ceboym 6 months ago
@ 30:35 Dr. Wood says: "I'm not proposing at all, a ray beam from outer space. That is not what this is about. This is about an energy field. An interference of energy fields."
zonsb 6 months ago
Wow, these 3 people talk a lot of crap, I have seen lots of documentaries and they are not prepare for such video.
Yes, Dr, we do have Alka Seltzer in the UK.
What about the WIND direction, I bet you did not think of that.
Dr?? It was an alien ship that shot the ray you mention, LOL!!!!!
And the presenter asks some things as if he did not research it first.
PerivaleBuses 6 months ago
@PerivaleBuses "Dr?? It was an alien ship that shot the ray you mention, LOL!!!!!" You just lied.
zonsb 6 months ago
This theory is interesting but the only problem I have with it is kinda the same as the rest of the people, evidence but no conclusions, she goes as far as to say directed energy weapons were used, but won't say where they come from. I mean you have to have some kind of theory where it came from if you're going to say it was used.
MetalHeadKLR650 6 months ago
@MetalHeadKLR650 I think you're asking too much. It's like people asking Richard Gage who the real culprits were. It's not his job - he's an architect, and studies buildings. Dr Wood is a scientist. Neither of them are criminal investigators. They just present the evidence - it's an entirely different field of expertise in determining the surrounding circumstances.
zapproowsdower 6 months ago
She gives a terrible interview. She should have someone else present the evidence for her. ITs intruiging but when you listen to her its not believable
BrianSStaveley 6 months ago
The photos of burnt out cars with tires and seats left intact is consistent with other photos documented. Meaning that the photos Judy Woods has produced of the burnt cars is not unusual .
I would find it unusual if there were any evidence that the cars were on FDR Drive when they actually caught fire. Being four blocks away from the WTC demoltion would make that very suspicious. However, maybe FDR Drive was only used to stockpile burnt cars that were towed in from the WTC site and fires
Chidanandaji 6 months ago
Bottom Line...The Luciferians have their hands on the button. Most of these idiots die off, except the Jesuits. These demons are constant. They have had posession of Directed Energy since the 1980's. They murder people left right and centre, even their own Cardinals are afraid of them.To save the career of their own Puppet, Prime Minister, in Ireland, Bertie Ahearn, they murdered his opponent in Moscow, Liam Lawlor, also Ahearns local priest Father Kennedy, Iona Rd, murdered 2004. RIP.
commins100 7 months ago
To chasluim34,
dr. judy wood is 100% DISINFORMATION AND MISINFORMATION.
Case closed - Nano Thermite + other explosives were used to bring down all THREE World Trade Centers.
Your favorites look ok , lets not forget
"The Tavistock Institue of Human Relations" & "the commitee of 300" by Dr John coleman.
secret societes Fabians, Freemasons, Jesuits,etc...& Bankers.
search: Norman Dodd, Depopulation (Georgia Guide Stones), Bolshevik Revolution, UNCED agenda 21, codex alimentarius, Niels Harrit
letsgomd 7 months ago
To chasluim34,
dr. judy wood is 100% DISINFORMATION AND MISINFORMATION.
Case closed - Nano Thermite and other explosives were used to bring down all THREE World Trade Centers.
Focus on the world wide coupe to Depopulate (Georgia Guide Stones)
Your other video favorites look at first glance to be on target, lets not forget
"The Tavistock Institue of Human Relations" & "the commitee of 300" by Dr John colman.
secret societes Fabians, Freemasons, Jesuits,etc... & Bankers.
search Norman Dodd.
letsgomd 7 months ago
@letsgomd Wow - no evidence referenced for your accusations - then you dive off into other matters not even mentioned in this video. Isn't this itself a clear indication of disinformation at work? Looks that way to me. So where is the Nano-thermite/thermite based court case or other legal action? I think you'll find it doesn't exist. If you google "thermite free rfc" (or look for that video on my channel), you will find out why.
checktheevidence 7 months ago
This is The JFK Thing All Over Again...Sadly We Wont Ever Know The Truth Until The Conspirators Are All Long Dead & Gone....This is Some Pretty Compelling Evidence, But I Lean Towards a Combination of Nano-Thermite, Explosives & Some Type of Microwave or Plasma Weapon...This Isn't Any Great Consolation to The People Who Lost Loved Ones on 911, But Every Action in Life Has Either a Negative or Positive Return & That Applies to Everyone.......
CelticBadBoyPoet7 7 months ago
@nebula25x Well said, and 100% accurate. I belong to AE911truth and I really like Richard Gage but I like Judy's BALLS?
godbluffvdgg 7 months ago
Woods, to me was the first one to make sense of the DEMOLITIONS of the towers. Her education is impeccable. And, it makes sense when you consider the speed of the collapse and the outlying unusual damage. I believe this is the Hutchinson effect on steroids. Or, more likely some deep level five beta test in real time. The deaths were an ancillary benefit to the neo cons to institute their wars so as to provide the trillions they wanted to steal. The business of U.S.A is war and business is good.
godbluffvdgg 7 months ago
WHERE DID THE BUILDINGS GO? 2. Concrete is a mixture of cement, sand and aggregate. Cement is a powder of limestone (calcuim carbonate) and clay. Aggregate is small rock or gravel. Concrete varies in weight according to type of aggregate used. I have held a type called Saturna Aggregate, a volcanic minteral so light it floats in water, used for making lightest weight concrete. Of what was towers' concrete composed? How much did it weigh?
FirstUsedBooks 7 months ago
@FirstUsedBooks Saturna? do you know what that means? i wouldnt be surprised if that was the concrete used
Lsduende1 4 months ago
WHERE DID THE BUILDINGS GO? 1. The award winning innovative feature of this at the time new type of tower design was that it used less material and provided greater rentable space than types hitherto used. Most of the material consisted of steel columns, concrete floors, and light gauge steel trusses. We know that the concrete was pulverized and distributed throughout Manhattan. We know that the basement was 60-70 ft deep, deep enough to hold most of remaining material?
FirstUsedBooks 7 months ago
DISSOLVING STEEL COLUMN, which is the main stimulus for this theory. I'm thinking it's a combination of two things. The column section is breaking and tipping as it falls, disturbing the cement-dust laden air, and the cameraman is doing a fade-out. Net result is a ghostly apparition of where the column had been before it dropped out of picture.
FirstUsedBooks 7 months ago
Burnt out police car with rust holes in floor between seats (if I've understood correctly): Seems to me these "rust holes" are more likely to have been screw holes to which the support stand for the cop's computer was anchored.
FirstUsedBooks 7 months ago
Trucks carting in and removing soil (1:21:38) is called site remediation, removing toxins. Laws determine a maximum contaminatiion for material dumped into the ocean. Instead of one highly contaminated bargeful (above the legal limit), you bring in fresh uncontaminated soil to dilure, and then you dump five bargefuls. The guy around 1:20 is washing off the hose of his pump which has presumably been in a contaminated liquid that he doesn't want to bring home.
FirstUsedBooks 7 months ago
For me, this is a new theory. I've seen nano-termites, thermonuclear charges and a couple of others. The intriguing thing is not which is right or wrong, but how all of them offer a more plausible explantion than the official 9/11 account.
FirstUsedBooks 7 months ago
anyone who believes this bullshit has no practical sense whatsoever. idiots.
stepthrutuner 7 months ago
@stepthrutuner After 25 mins of it, I'd say she's making quite a bit of sense, enough to keep me viewing and to go looking for other pro & con points of view.
FirstUsedBooks 7 months ago
@FirstUsedBooks the only 'directed energy weapons' that hit the towers on that day were planes.
stepthrutuner 7 months ago
@stepthrutuner You are most likely right, but until we have a theory that adequately explains events, it is best not to summarily dismiss alternatives. IMO it's better to review and analyze and use logic to explain and refute. I'm assuming that you are not content with the official version, otherwise why would you be clicking on this kind of stuff at all? Good thing about this video was that it reminded me of the dissolving column, which I'd been puzzled by 10 years ago.
FirstUsedBooks 7 months ago
@stepthrutuner What degrees do you have??? Oh, that's right you stayed at a holiday inn. Suck dick you pussy ass traitor mook.
godbluffvdgg 7 months ago
@godbluffvdgg my degree is in common sense you cow fucking moron
stepthrutuner 7 months ago
@stepthrutuner Yeah, you have a lot of sense...NONSENSE. Now, go blow a duck (sic), ya homeless dirtbag asslicker!
godbluffvdgg 7 months ago
hahaha what a load of total and complete bullshiTT
stepthrutuner 7 months ago
@nebula25x That's great! I stand corrected. Unfortunately there's no platform for these "credible" people to be heard from other than youtube and "fringe" sites... which I don't think broadly sweeps them aside - just it's much harder for the general public to get on board. What's the solution? Ron Paul!
ouluvme2 7 months ago
While I don't believe the official story - I certainly don't think some lady in her 50's skyping us through what she believes is the "silver bullet" theory - yeah... I'll pass on this one.
Unless it's from credible, established, licensed and hands on investigators - it's all conjecture and quackery till then!
ouluvme2 7 months ago
Analyze the behavior of the dust from a fluid dynamics point of view...
LuminosityEntangled 7 months ago
WTC1 & 2 weighed 500,000 tons each, & WTC7 weighed 40,000 tons? There should be 1,040,000 tons of collapsed debris. How much of it was dustified & where did the dust go? How much of it has been received at the various places it was supposedly taken away to for recycling & whatever? Do the photos show the full picture or just a partial one? Is the evidence misleading?
Galv140577 8 months ago
im still on the fence about this new theory Judy woods has came out with, I agree that 9/11 was an inside job but i think the David Ray Griffin Theory is more accurate
633390 8 months ago
Judy Wood is one of these techies who is almost inarticulate. It's really quite funny. Whatever you wanna call it it's directed weapon that's a weapon with energy which is directed it isn't kinetic energy that's something differnt ya just have ta look at the evidence these people repeat what they're told because it's what they bin told so they just repeat it it seems to be a new type a weapon it looks like cylindrtical holes they are real round scaling it they look bigger when you look closer
rerevisionist 8 months ago
@rerevisionist Yeah, you're a fucking genius...NOT. Here... It's the phone... It's your brain... It misses you.
godbluffvdgg 7 months ago
@godbluffvdgg - thanks for your useful contribution. Next time you're tempted to write trash, reconsider.
rerevisionist 7 months ago
3 NUKES 5 BOMBS A MISSILE A DEMOLITION CREW AND A LOT OF LIES = 911
dhudson369 8 months ago
The 1,000 toasted cars and millions of bits of unharmed paper floating in the air are the 2 smoking guns for me.
shackle5 9 months ago
911 : THE ACCUSATION - KEVIN SMITH SH0W & ROBERT JAN KELDER
LATELIERDELALIBERTE 9 months ago
I HAVE read what YOU'VE said, but YOU'RE NOT getting the point.
It takes ages to get through the FACTS that the planes are forged, you hinder the info, thus making it look less valid to your viewers! You have a vital role as mediator to the viewers.
Anrdew Johson looked well pissed off with you! haha have a look at it again!?!?
It could've done with solid evidence for the plane forgery, generally it's a great explaination of the crazy physics involved.
Don't reply again, I won't, you're boring
BailedSkateboards 10 months ago