But have you re-watched this series within the last two years?
Whether you like it or not, the art direction of the new series is much more skillful. Camera shots evoke emotion well, characters' motivations are more understandable, and battles are more actively interesting. It is a modern show; it won't follow the history exactly. But neither did Luo Guanzhong's SGYY.
And if your argument is simply that the new director "does gay things", stop. Just stop.
@kanraga the battles contain reused footage and there are less battles in the 2010 version. I can tell you that every major battle in the old TV series (from Wan castle to Jiang Wei's campaigns) is unique, and elaborately explained. The battles, believe it or not, are less realistic in the 2010 version solely due to the fact that everyone has armor. Several characters who were featured prominently in the 1994 version (e.g Guo Jia) got much less screentime.
@ShaotheGreat Whether or not the battles are unique shots is a moot point. If they aren't interesting, if the characters' motivations for fighting aren't clearly shown through their *own* actions and not through the mood-interrupting narration, and if the soldiers themselves don't look like they want to be there, I would rather have stock footage instead. I think the old series' lackluster, unenthusiastic soldiers look far more unrealistic than the new series' armored footmen.
@kanraga It is not a moot point! Battles were more than 70% of what the time period was. You didn't watch the battles for the enthusiasm of peasants, you watched for the strategies and the generals. You watch the ebb and flow of battles such as Guan Du and He Fei. You watch the stellar acting of people like Bao An Guo as Cao Cao. The narration does not interrupt the mood, because the narrator's voice is awesome. You also seem to forget that they used "mood-interrupting" narration in the new one
@ShaotheGreat I will give you that the new series didn't do long-distance views of battles very well. But what the new series did do was explain battles properly, give reasons for why and how they occurred, and what the outcome would mean - using only characters. Unlike the old series, the new series neither had nor needed episodic, expository narration, because it told its basic story well. I liked the narrator's voice, but he should not have been *necessary* to understand the plot.
@ShaotheGreat In any case, youtube is not a good place to begin heavy discussion on the relative merits of the old and new series. If you'd like to talk further, may I suggest the Scholars of Shen Zhou forums? Threads would allow us to talk more freely than these character-limited comment boxes, and also avoid spamming OP's video thread. I'm "Nazne" there.
@kanraga the art directions are more skillful because they have to -- like if you don't sleep well the the other night you probably need to wear makeup. i'm not saying that i'm against post processing, but only post processing is not enough. the characters' personalities are written on their very face because their understanding is so shallow that they are afraid if they don't do so the audience won't understand. truth is their audience probably read the original novel more times that they did
I still prefer everything about this version compared to the 2010 version. Modern movies like Red Cliff, Three Kingdoms and The Lost Bladesman are still pale in comparison compared to this.
It's a shame that they didn't cover the story till the very end (i.e. Fall of Wu), though.
I guess it depends how you were brought up. For us who grew up in mainland China, whatever came out of Hong Kong or Taiwan were, well, may or may not be good, plenty of them were awesome, yet they still, comparing to shows produced in mainland China, couldn't capture the, you know, the historical significance of historical events. I dont know how you feel, but whenever I see an show ostensibly "historical show" from hong kong or taiwan, I can't help but wondering: man, this can't be
I can't be agree more. historical background shows from mainland China usually are much better than the ones from Hong Kong. Especailly the recent movies from Hong Kong, they look like a joke rather than a histrical movie.
@tomcat815 I agree with you very much. The background music, sound effects, tools are "modernized". Compared to the new version of Romance of the Three Kingdoms (2010), I still favour this version.
true cuz I might not be sure what history, politics, or culture was really about. I'm pretty about it's not really about some juvenile problems the protagonists have with his or her parents or siblings. As cynical as shows produced in mainland might sound, IMHO, it captures what happens in real life much mors so than shows from much more commercialized societies, which, almost invariably, always reduce historically significantly events into petty squabbles about
I totally agree! All original ones are really high quality, and leave deep and good impression in ppl's mind. I dont know why some stupid guys wasted money to make new ones??? why not use the money to support poor ppl? ppl who are like wu yu sen, they are good at making low quality films, boring ones, kinda of porn, they stupid!
老家穷,90年代后才通电,有电视后印象最深的就是三国了,难忘经典。
mingtiannihao 1 month ago
翻拍4大名著的导演都是脑白吃,吴宇森是只能拍色情片的货,凑他妈什么热闹侮辱名著. 现在的傻比演员都是没文化的没素质的白吃,跟导演上床就能上镜头,整个都是垃圾 .
fwyy 4 months ago
以前那些演员是演艺圈的,现在这些是娱乐圈的....
tureforest 4 months ago 3
新版华而不实。武打倒是还不错, 但是对话台词平俗, 昔日驰骋疆场,留名千史的人物被排的一点气势和深度都没有, 文化水平接近我六岁时读的画书版的三国演义。。。这个版本虽然没有新版那么华丽, 但是人物刻画到点, 对话经典含蓄。演义中古人的那股豪爽, 朴素, 以及乱世中英雄辈出的环境, 都刻画得比新版好不止一个档次。 这才更符合我们心中的三国!!
thedoomedninjia 5 months ago
@thedoomedninjia 新版把钱都花在道具,服装等次要上了,主要的人物给人感觉非常粗糙,没有好的人物设定为基础,场景跟道具再华丽整部剧给人的感觉还是很粗糙.
aviationyu 4 months ago
But have you re-watched this series within the last two years?
Whether you like it or not, the art direction of the new series is much more skillful. Camera shots evoke emotion well, characters' motivations are more understandable, and battles are more actively interesting. It is a modern show; it won't follow the history exactly. But neither did Luo Guanzhong's SGYY.
And if your argument is simply that the new director "does gay things", stop. Just stop.
kanraga 6 months ago
@kanraga the battles contain reused footage and there are less battles in the 2010 version. I can tell you that every major battle in the old TV series (from Wan castle to Jiang Wei's campaigns) is unique, and elaborately explained. The battles, believe it or not, are less realistic in the 2010 version solely due to the fact that everyone has armor. Several characters who were featured prominently in the 1994 version (e.g Guo Jia) got much less screentime.
These are only some of the differences
ShaotheGreat 5 months ago
@ShaotheGreat Whether or not the battles are unique shots is a moot point. If they aren't interesting, if the characters' motivations for fighting aren't clearly shown through their *own* actions and not through the mood-interrupting narration, and if the soldiers themselves don't look like they want to be there, I would rather have stock footage instead. I think the old series' lackluster, unenthusiastic soldiers look far more unrealistic than the new series' armored footmen.
kanraga 5 months ago
@kanraga It is not a moot point! Battles were more than 70% of what the time period was. You didn't watch the battles for the enthusiasm of peasants, you watched for the strategies and the generals. You watch the ebb and flow of battles such as Guan Du and He Fei. You watch the stellar acting of people like Bao An Guo as Cao Cao. The narration does not interrupt the mood, because the narrator's voice is awesome. You also seem to forget that they used "mood-interrupting" narration in the new one
ShaotheGreat 5 months ago
@ShaotheGreat I will give you that the new series didn't do long-distance views of battles very well. But what the new series did do was explain battles properly, give reasons for why and how they occurred, and what the outcome would mean - using only characters. Unlike the old series, the new series neither had nor needed episodic, expository narration, because it told its basic story well. I liked the narrator's voice, but he should not have been *necessary* to understand the plot.
kanraga 5 months ago
@ShaotheGreat In any case, youtube is not a good place to begin heavy discussion on the relative merits of the old and new series. If you'd like to talk further, may I suggest the Scholars of Shen Zhou forums? Threads would allow us to talk more freely than these character-limited comment boxes, and also avoid spamming OP's video thread. I'm "Nazne" there.
kanraga 5 months ago
Comment removed
silencecf 4 months ago
Comment removed
silencecf 4 months ago
@kanraga the art directions are more skillful because they have to -- like if you don't sleep well the the other night you probably need to wear makeup. i'm not saying that i'm against post processing, but only post processing is not enough. the characters' personalities are written on their very face because their understanding is so shallow that they are afraid if they don't do so the audience won't understand. truth is their audience probably read the original novel more times that they did
silencecf 4 months ago
I still prefer everything about this version compared to the 2010 version. Modern movies like Red Cliff, Three Kingdoms and The Lost Bladesman are still pale in comparison compared to this.
It's a shame that they didn't cover the story till the very end (i.e. Fall of Wu), though.
JohnathanLeeSprite 6 months ago
我也同意大家说得,四大名著本来原版拍得很成功,很深入人心, 不知道那些神经病所谓的导演又重拍什么?! 有多余的钱捐给希望工程阿. 还有,拜托那些港台的屁导演少参与大陆的历史剧,把精力放在那些戏说和嬉皮笑脸剧就行了!
fwyy 7 months ago 3
袁紹様大好き♡
田豊や沮授は、荀彧や程昱に太刀打ちできる器量だったのに、
活かしきれなかったのが残念
そういう人間くさい袁紹様が好き♡
甄夫人も好き♡
kazutosi26 7 months ago
老版的服装道具才叫一个考究啊!
tuxianyu 11 months ago 4
这些人的长相才是曹操,孙权,诸葛亮,刘关张么,看看现在的新版简直就是恶心,于光荣的眼睛为了体现出丹凤,没有拉出什么病来就好,五子良将之一的夏侯惇怎么看怎么像是蹲窑子的猥琐大叔,一代虎将啊,就这么被毁了
Rekenfuckusa 1 year ago
@Rekenfuckusa 夏侯敦好像不是五子良将之一哦。。。不过的确, 太多的英雄人物为了体现其他“主角” 的厉害 都被拍成熊样了, 郁闷
thedoomedninjia 5 months ago
I went to the little town where they did the shooting of this when i was 10, its pretty epic...
51674 1 year ago
滾滾長江東逝水,浪花淘盡英雄。是非成敗轉頭空,青山依舊在,幾度夕陽紅?
白髮漁樵江渚上,慣看秋月春風。一壺濁酒喜相逢,古今多少事,都付笑談中。
dannyfong71 1 year ago
还有比这个更经典的三国演义曲子吗?我不知道,如果你知道,请告诉我.
eatfastnoodle 1 year ago 3
這個版本不好聽, 還是以前亞洲電視播的時候好聽
mskcwong 1 year ago
@mskcwong
I guess it depends how you were brought up. For us who grew up in mainland China, whatever came out of Hong Kong or Taiwan were, well, may or may not be good, plenty of them were awesome, yet they still, comparing to shows produced in mainland China, couldn't capture the, you know, the historical significance of historical events. I dont know how you feel, but whenever I see an show ostensibly "historical show" from hong kong or taiwan, I can't help but wondering: man, this can't be
eatfastnoodle 1 year ago
@eatfastnoodle
I can't be agree more. historical background shows from mainland China usually are much better than the ones from Hong Kong. Especailly the recent movies from Hong Kong, they look like a joke rather than a histrical movie.
tomcat815 1 year ago
@tomcat815 I agree with you very much. The background music, sound effects, tools are "modernized". Compared to the new version of Romance of the Three Kingdoms (2010), I still favour this version.
adriank0615 6 months ago
@mskcwong
true cuz I might not be sure what history, politics, or culture was really about. I'm pretty about it's not really about some juvenile problems the protagonists have with his or her parents or siblings. As cynical as shows produced in mainland might sound, IMHO, it captures what happens in real life much mors so than shows from much more commercialized societies, which, almost invariably, always reduce historically significantly events into petty squabbles about
eatfastnoodle 1 year ago
@mskcwong love affairs between men and women
eatfastnoodle 1 year ago
@mskcwong nuts!
leoforce2002 1 year ago
老板的人物,对白,加上赤壁的服饰,道具(除了夸张的装甲部队),可能就完美了
gocymru 1 year ago
@gocymru 老般的演员外形跟妆容打扮以及剧情跟台词 + 赤壁跟新三的武戏/战争戏,道具,场景 = 完美
aviationyu 4 months ago
潛規則多了,好片也就少了,獸獸這樣的蕩婦博取大眾視線的時候,我們還能對這個娛樂圈說些什麽?
duanlimian 1 year ago
宇宙无敌版三国演义
当时我记得和外婆讨论百花奖最佳演员到底给鲍国安还是唐国强。。
陆树铭演员找的也极为神似,太牛了实在是
Shin Sangoku Musou!!
SonyWilliam 1 year ago
一切翻拍名著的企图都是狗尾续貂
qiaoermiao 1 year ago
我看新版的西游记红楼梦三国演义之类的也不顺眼,看来我已经老了,世界已经属于那帮孙子了
andrewsengland 2 years ago 10
喜欢老版的三国,这才是我想象中的那个传奇的时代,鲍国安演的曹操太棒了,关羽刘备张飞也很像,唐国强演的诸葛亮也不错,周瑜那个演员太阴柔了
viennalx 2 years ago 5
杨慎这首实在是绝了
panpanppy 2 years ago
以前拍片就是为了拍出好片。现在是为了赚钱。。。当然不一样了。。以前的很多老片都是经典。。
不过在这个向钱看的时代了,几乎已经看不见英雄了。有的只是官商勾结的小人和地痞。。。。。
yanggc12 2 years ago 4
好辞啊!!小时候就看三国演义,但不是很懂,现在越看越有味道!
MrQianli 2 years ago 2
I totally agree! All original ones are really high quality, and leave deep and good impression in ppl's mind. I dont know why some stupid guys wasted money to make new ones??? why not use the money to support poor ppl? ppl who are like wu yu sen, they are good at making low quality films, boring ones, kinda of porn, they stupid!
fwyy 2 years ago 2
老版的场景道具粗糙了点但人物,对白,音乐都得神髓。吴宇森喜欢同性恋,变态性虐,暴力。本可随他,可那垃圾偏偏自不量力的排三国。。。恶心死我了。诸葛亮,周瑜就差没给他俩安排床戏了。。。什么东西。 鄙视吴宇森!!!
IwantaYBaccount 2 years ago 85
說得好!吳宇森只是一個變態,沒出息。
EmperorChiCheung 2 years ago 6
大陆拍不了武侠,太死板,侠客象土匪,香港台湾拍不了古典名著还有其他历史大片,眼界太小,老是纠缠男人女人那点事情。最好还是各安本分,干自己干的好的。
eatfastnoodle 1 year ago 13
@eatfastnoodle 张纪中版的笑傲江湖,个人还是挺喜欢的。
lin05292008 8 months ago
@IwantaYBaccount 哈哈哈,朋友,老版的道具可一点都不粗糙,当年都是在社科院的老专家指导下制造出来的,衣服都是根据出土文献的记载手工缝制出来的,花了很多心血啊,但是原汁原味的还原了历史场景,三国时代的东西没有那么华丽的。
yulecat 1 year ago 6
片尾曲历史的星辰也很不错
szdp55123 3 years ago 4
对,毛阿敏不错
jesuisamok 2 years ago
oh~ this is a great movie!!!!
tzuqiu2008 3 years ago
经典。红楼梦和三国演义是同一个导演。科技进步了,片子拍的没那么好看了。
jadebai 3 years ago 11
我听过鲍国安说他演曹操那会儿,为了那著名的三声大笑,每天都不停的捉摸
commonfeeling 2 years ago 17
哎。。。现在的人越来越活回去了。。。一代不如一代。。
dogdog1030 2 years ago 5
给你个拇指
jadebai 2 years ago
现在的片子太商业了
slzNO1 3 years ago
为啥现在拍的什么都没有以前好呢?红楼,西游。。。难道人活回去了,还是由于这些是第二部没有第一部这样让人印象深刻,或者深入人心呢?不明白。。。理论上不应该阿。科学进步,无论设备还是道具都要会让电视剧更加好才是啊。奇怪。。
dogdog1030 3 years ago
你倒不明白,中国古代东西的确比现代很不同。你讲的是经典之作呢,怎么能相比了。你不知道中国的事物是古老的,用现代科技是不能满足的,好比西方文化跟中国文化截然不同。
chucky0404 3 years ago
还是不明白为啥现在新出的东西人家都在骂,为啥高科技超越不了当年的经典。。算了管它呢。跟我也没多大关系。。
dogdog1030 3 years ago
第一部拍摄的人是用心去拍得,而不是为钱拍的。
比如第一部红楼梦的时候,女演员的选取都是综合考虑小说里面的人物特点,全国范围里面找出来的。而且演员每天都要求要读红楼梦,认真体会人物。哪像现在,找几个脸蛋好的,没读过红楼的去演,都跟妓女似的
commonfeeling 2 years ago 77
应该说,找几个愿意陪睡的辍学少女演的。
strongestass 2 years ago
@commonfeeling
还是老电视剧好 有深邃 现在的没法比
JTryan02 1 year ago
@commonfeeling 旧版红楼演员都是从天上来人间的,新版红楼演员都是从天上人间来的
yulecat 8 months ago 2
词作者可是成都新都的大明正德状元哦
shrin2008 3 years ago
永远的经典啊,现在拍的一点韵味都没有
417558235 3 years ago
這才是真正的歷史片!!
現在的電影越拍越爛了!!
zusocfc 3 years ago 8
當年拍的東西多正!演員怎么看怎么像歷史人物
《赤壁》太垃圾了,簡直沒法比
FishiceYu 3 years ago 7
汝說言甚得吾心!
TanQinJi 3 years ago
我觉得三国的片头曲永远都是不朽的经典歌曲,三国的那种气势是任何一个朝代所不能比拟的,而这首歌曲的气势又非常恰当地唱出了三国乱世中那种群雄争霸,明争暗斗,英雄之心都写了出来,真的不失为永恒的经典啊,太棒了!!!!!!!!
huxiaoran1994 3 years ago 6
你看过战国策吗?
rongjingji 3 years ago
看过,但是没看全哦,太深奥了!!!!!!!!
huxiaoran1994 3 years ago
Kanu and Koumei were suitable for my image.
JIJIKK39 3 years ago
明朝杨慎的词
我看明朝那些事刚知道的:)
顺便向大家推荐一下这本书
andrewsengland 3 years ago 2
我也看了,
杨慎这厮纠集了几十个年轻小官员就想在皇宫里面把自己老爹的政敌当场打死。真不愧是天下第一太子党。
呵呵
ArthurMolen 3 years ago
四大名著里我最欣赏三国,特别喜欢那个战乱年代,驰骋沙场的英雄们,慧者们之间的智慧较量,军事战争,三国是一个很雄伟的年代!
huxiaoran1994 3 years ago 3
我不但喜欢这首歌曲,还很喜欢罗贯中的词,感觉把三国的那种气势都写出来了!歌曲的气势也很好,特别像三国那种战乱年代的气势......总之,太棒了!!
huxiaoran1994 3 years ago 2
这是明朝大才子杨慎杨静庵在贬谪路上所作
liubebo 3 years ago
原来如此,可我 看的《三国演义》上没有说哎,不过杨静庵是谁?我并不认识额他既然是贬谛路上所作,那为什么用在三国里这么恰当,好像专门为三国乱世所作一样。
huxiaoran1994 3 years ago
清代毛宗岗父子加进去的好像。罗贯中写就的是《三国志通俗演义》,准确地说应该是整理收集评论话本写就的。如今的《三国演义》是由毛宗岗父子定本的。
imsailin 3 years ago
说的是杨慎的词《临江仙》。
imsailin 3 years ago
这是小说的起首词。
《肉蒲团》这本小说的起首词也很有意思,呵呵。
ArthurMolen 3 years ago
《满庭芳》:黑发难留,朱颜易变,人生不比青松。名消利息,一派落花风。悔杀少年不乐,风流院,放逐衰翁。王孙辈,听歌金缕,及早恋芳药。世间真乐地,算来算去,还数房中。不比荣华境,欢始愁终。得趣朝朝,燕酣眠处,怕响晨钟。睁眼看,乾坤覆载,一幅大春宫。
ArthurMolen 3 years ago
真是好词啊,世间沧桑纷繁万事都付渔樵浊酒笑谈中。
crukta 3 years ago 7
mmmxcy 3 years ago 6
有气势
btester 3 years ago 2
经典, 中国难得拍的有有气势的影片, 经典
chenchen2007 3 years ago 2
Very Nice, Very Very Nice
iTrilobite 3 years ago 3
太棒了太棒了太棒了太棒了
awesomeawesomeawesomeawesome
Can't always do a direct translation. English is easy. CUPCAKE>
Renaissancedehuaxia 3 years ago 3
关于awesome这个词,我一直以为是"可怕"的意思......没想到也可以是指非常好~
英语实在太难了
wuxiangjinxing 3 years ago 4
英语不难,awesome的意思就是"太棒了"的那个意思。
macbookhl 3 years ago
awesome means NB :D
eatshityoutwo 3 years ago
杨慎 临江仙 二十一史弹词
iamjc01 4 years ago 2
有没有人知道这首歌的词?
ZJH89 4 years ago 2
词就是 三国演义 书的开头
zhengchengwenzaici 4 years ago 2
我已经知道这首歌的名字。我要知道这首歌的词。
ZJH89 4 years ago 2
滚滚长江东逝水,浪花淘尽英雄。是非成败转头空。青山依旧在,几度夕阳红。白发鱼樵江煮上,惯看秋月春风。一壶浊酒喜相逢。古今多少事,都付笑谈中。
hphottie713 4 years ago 3
好好!!!!!
zhengchengwenzaici 4 years ago 2
Great
true1983 4 years ago 2
awesome
championofcathay 4 years ago 2