Added: 4 years ago
From: FrictionTV
Views: 10,390
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (111)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • Comment removed

  • Comment removed

  • It's upsetting that animals are used as our test subjects, but how else are we supposed to advance our sciences? Would everyone prefer to use humans instead? And let's not forget that all our medicines are derived via animal testing. So if you have a problem with it, just don't use any medicines whatsoever.

  • who the fuck are you people to try and say stop animal testing? i would rather have an animal die in pain then a human being...thst why they fuckin do the tests....animals are here for one reason, for humans...we are the smartest form of life on this planet and thats that. animals are here for our consumption and such...SHUT THE FUCK UP you fags who are saying how would you like to be in a cage....animals arent goin through this for no reason its for our won saftey....so shut your fuckin mouths

  • @andrewdevito81012 you are so wrong. If humans died out, the planet would flourish with life. If all animals died out, the planet would be doomed.

  • @andrewdevito81012 "fags" yeah you sound the smartest form of life dear, hey why don't you go and do research and see how actually animal testing majority of the time FAILS? if it's for humans it's safer and better to test on humans and then you get accurate results, you ignorant piece of shit

  • without animal testing we would all be dead by now. Get over it.

  • Comment removed

  • @medomuffen

    ..just fuck off.

  • @medomuffen That's why we put fucktards like you in cages instead of them.

  • MODERATE MY ASS your such a *** like the government your messing around and watch things won't go so well lter

  • Mankind is truly evil, ...EVIL

  • 1983

    The great majority of perinatal toxicological studies seem to be intended to convey medico-legal protection to the pharmaceutical houses and political protection to the official regulatory bodies, rather than produce information that might be of value in human therapeutics. Prof Hawkins, Drugs and Pregnancy: Human Teratogenesis and Related Problems, p 41-49 (publ. Churchill Livingstone).

  • It’s been well known for maybe two decades that many of these preclinical human cancer models have very little predictive power in terms of how actual human beings – actual human tumours inside patients – will respond…Preclinical models of human cancer, in large part, stink…Hundreds of millions of dollars are being wasted every year by drug companies using these [animal] models…Prof. Robert Weinberg, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Fortune, 9th March.2004

    curedisease. net

  • I worked on case studies using animals in US and quit because I couldn't take it anymore, (transcribing job only-ALL tox reports/studies) doesn't meant it stopped, I'm not exposed anymore.

    Scary part for us is some "tested" drugs were deemed unsafe but still got pushed out the door via pay off to FDA. Documents are protected, due to "privileged/confidential/propr­ietary" information, by US Congress. Ever seen "recalls" commercials? Until we stop human cruelty, animals (land/sea/air) have no hope

  • @emmalenesmom Thanks for exposing corruption int eh FDA. Drug co's FDA govt all in this fraud together.“Animal studies are done for legal reasons and not for scientific reasons. The predictive value of such studies for man is meaningless.”; - Dr James D. Gallagher; Director of Medical Research; Lederle Laboratories; Journal of the American Medical Association; March 14 1964.; curedisease. net

  • I wonder if any other intelligent species did anything like this in They're history. Eh, maybe. Not the Grey's... MAYBE.

  • testing on an innocent rabbit or a convicted child serial killer..

    easy choice for me

  • @HdjoRn The rabbit

  • Humans ARE animals themselves. Blood runs though our vein just like them, yet humans think they have the right to do this? To whoever supports this: I hope you burn in hell. Why cant people just let things be? I support this lady 110% and i think people are making a huge mistake fucking around with this kind of stuff. This is pure selfishness, causing this kind of suffering to animals so they can test this bullshit. I would like to see these people suffer instead of the animals.

  • Here are my views. Before you start saying shit about how im a animal hater and stuff think about this. We know most about the human body from Galileo digging up graves and the Nazi atrocities that were commited. If it werent for those acts, we would have substantially lower knowledge. I'm not saying its justified as WWII was really terrifying, but im sayin that the concept lies there.

    Animals are no different.

  • she's right. no matter what, no matter how you look at it, animal testing is sick and fucking wrong

  • ya know, maybe we should worry about ourselves instead of animals first. We are in one of the worst states the world has ever been in and we cant waste a minute on anything else

    P.S. I LOVE animals but its just drastic how much we deal with them

  • excuse me but you do not LOVE animals if you are willing to suggest it's okay to allow them to suffer barbarically just because humans are suffering. One has nothing to do with the other except for those that can sit back and allow animal suffering most likely would allow a child to suffer. Idiot.

  • @anim8er7 I believe we are connected with animals more than you think right now. How can we humans think these kind of "people" work to help us, when they keep playing this evil game in their labs with creatures who can't even say "It hurts". Injecting human diseases to healthy animals means changing the cause of the disease, the origin. And that means... dead end. These bastards should be banned from working as scientists, they are businessmen. New medicines coming frm this make us sicker!

  • This cracks me up. How does she define "substantial suffering," and how does she expect to find cures without animal testing? Should we just be like "Here kid, try this drug out. Maybe it will work." If she is really against animal testing, maybe she should step up to the plate and offer herself up as a test subject in the name of medical and scientific progress. It might set a good example.

    "Hating what is wrong and feeling right about it is not the same as doing what is right."

  • funny you should write this... can you name a cure for anything where animal experimentation was used? and also, yes many vaccines and drugs we use were tested on children, African Americans and other segments of the population.

  • You don't even know what you are talking about, many ill people stand up for testing hoping to find a cure for them selves and other people. It is obvious this kind of treatment and testing they are doing is abusive and straight out killing an innocent animal that did not sign up for this. How would you feel if strangers took your healthy child with out you having a word to say and did experiments on them making them feel pain every day until they died? these animals do not deserve this.

  • well they did it to children concerning cigarettes. Americans did again with DDT. And they are doing it again with the pig flu vaccine. And AGAIN when the UN did not accept the cure for AIDS that had been found by an African doctor. etc etc need I go on?

  • Animals substantially suffer during experimentation/vivisection you idiot. This lady is a hero for speaking out against this evil.

  • From a moral perspective, animal experiments are abhorrent. However, it is even more important to focus on the human cost of animal tests. Big pharma would love nothing more than to spread the idea that it is a choice between a human and an animal, it is not. These tests are unscientific, they have stalled progress, many have died from tested drugs.

    Watch: The human cost of animal testing (here on YouTube)

    Only buy products from companies that dont test on animals & let companies know.

  • All of your comments are rediculous. Put yourselves all into a cage for a couple of weeks.. Lets experiment on you.

  • i dont see any shocking images. that was nothing check out a video called The Truth About Make up and you'll see some shocking images

  • Dear Michelle...I'm wondering..what do you considerete as "21 century animal cures"?...and how can be achive?.

  • most of the scientists doin it are probably nerds that have no social lives and suck at sport :/

  • How do u know that?....:D...u dont even understand the meanig of the word "science"?....u dont even know the motivation or waht do u need to be prepare to do if u want to became a scientist. So sush!.

  • I don't have a social life and I don't do sports, but what the *bleep* does that matter!?

    This is not about scientists!

    You can't measure how evil someone is with the zeitgeist that has not arrived yet!

    Ad hominem arguments are for losers btw... Roflmao, bithszh!

  • stupid jock!

  • Leaving an intelligent animal to just die for the sake of 'human progress'? What kind of people are these scientist that they just watch that unaffected. I don't care how many smart asses may try and justify these actions with that 'well they only use 1% cats and dogs in research' bullshit! This is disgusting, I'm going to do my utmost to stop it continuing. If you can do this to living creatures and can see the pain it's in you can do it to humans.

  • I hate Those scientists so bad. I am crying right now because I love animals soooooooooooooo much and they cant just kill them! :(

  • Do you use aspirine?.....Hypocrite!

  • WTF!?!

  • I don't feel that this is about the love of animals other than ourselves. I think what really matters is the pain and suffering that are inflicted by us; our egocentric love is trivial.

    Science is so incredible important and I really think we should emphasize on producing results through means that does not inflict pain and suffering.

  • i'd take the place of animals and agree to do clinical trials and drug testing, animals cant tell us when they are in pain the bastards that test on animals deserve to be put through what theyve done to poor animals

  • Yes..they can the us if the feel pain....in a way far from what do you understand.

  • fuck animal testing...animal testing is not the same as testing on humans...animals are not humans therefore animals react differently...I hope the sorry sick fuckers who torture the animals in their tests are castrated, shot in their knee caps, doused in gasoline and burned alive muahhahahahahahahahahahahaahaa­aaa

  • Hypocrite!

    Here you are trying to stop pain from being inflicted at the same time as you talk proudly of inflicting pain on others!

    I hope you die painfully!

    ...ehe, sorry, I meant to say that I really love you... ;)

  • quit it!

  • 61% of medicine that makes it into the market ends up killing or seriously harming humans. keep in mind it passed in animal experimention. why you ask? because humans and animals are very different in many ways.

  • yes they are. humans have no brains and animals are spiritual evolved! shut just your damn mouth!! you'll see what happen a later time... you'll just see!

  • God will make you pay for what you support. Animal testing is animal cruelty and you turn the blind eye on them because they are animals? how cruel and patethic your soul is.

    When you cry alone and see yourself with cancer or your kids or the kids of your kids. Just remember this "what goes around, comes around", you are messing with God's creatures and karma? KARMA does exist.

  • @Chris19CHUPAPINGAS listen, testing is horrible and since animals are not completely like us the results from medical testing is NOT completely accurate. So, yeah. I would like to see you suffer from a disease from testing that won't help society at all.

  • @SceneQueensss Rats are not even like mice when it comes to medical research..."Given substances are not necessarily carcinogenic to all species. Studies show that 46% of chemicals found to be carcinogenic in rats were not carcinogenic in mice.(DiCarlo DrugMet Rev,15; p409-131984). If species as closely related as mice to rats do not even contract cancer similarly, it's not surprising that 19 out of 20 compounds that are safe for humans caused cancer in animals. (Mutagenesis1987;2:73-78.)

  • If you believe in God so much why do cast your own judgement on these people who do these expiriments on these animals. Also your using karma as if karma is supirior to god because god helps you through your path of life he dosn't just send a lightning bolt to you if you did evil. Ex: in the 1930's hitler created many concentration camps and put jews in them at was considered evil but our USSR ally made hitler a little school boy. Also i support medical study for expirimentationnot the stuff...

  • @Chris19CHUPAPINGAS that makes you look like a fresh looking lady. Ex you might have not known this but most of the little thing like painkillers and anti-depresents are tested on animals so that we don't die from them. Back to Faith, I know your just saying this out of hatred but you should try to save the people who run these animal labs if you thinks its wrong or why not you volunteer to get a doctor to slice your brain in half. If you want to fight my arguement then go ahead its1st amendment

  • @Chris19CHUPAPINGAS In the bible. Animals have no souls. why would god care?

  • @Chris19CHUPAPINGAS fraid I'm an atheist so this upsets me even more.

  • why are we humans doing this Can we not all help stop this , one person does make a diffrance ,, it would be diffrant if it was a human , people want human rights can we not start first with animal rights , STOP ANIMAL CRUELTY < X

  • (cont) And with a free conscience.

  • I'm just investigating this stuff today, but I can imagine how new nano technology experimentation, for instance, in the biological field gets to be first "tried" out on monkeys, etc. We couldn't even imagine the potentially excruciating torture these creatures might endure 2 see effects & unseen reprecussions. If medical science and breakthrough technology are reliant and derived from these human evils, you can have it. Sometimes I truly wish I were a Quaker, under Gods rules and living simply.

  • rust never sleeps

  • BUAV "the leading organisation campaigning against vivisection worldwide?" You must think we are all idiots with short memories; the BUAV hasn't been doing anything to stop vivisection for decades and is now the most thoroughly infiltrated of all AV organisations. They were exposed in the 80s by Hans Ruesch, but too few listened. Question: why has the BUAV NEVER undertaken a hard-hitting medical campaign against vivisection? Because their paymasters in the drugs industry forbid it.

  • People who support animal experimentation have a poor argument in saying that it's 'necessary'. How necessary would it be for an advanced alien race to carry-out chilling experiments on humans, simply on the basis of being more intelligent than humans?

  • We are actually preparing a debate in my class on animal research. It's fun to see how people get all emotional about the poor animals. But it is also interesting to hear all the other points of view based on reason.

    Truth is: not many big animals are used. It's mainly rats and fishes. We as a society need animal research to survive. It's agreed that many testings are needless (such as those to test cosmetics). But there's just no other way to obtain some type of info. So sorry ratatouille!

  • just jump of a cliff or something

  • hhahahahahahha

    what freaks.

    :D

  • over half of our medicines are from animal experimentations. EVERYTHING FROM: Blood transfusion, implants for parkinsons disease, vaccinations, the discovery of germs, the creation of the germ theory, flu medicine, cold medicine, heart transplants, implants for just about anything you can think of, chemotherapy, medical therapies for breast cancer. If you take out animal experimentation you take out new medicines.

    Research it for yourself next time...Idiots.

  • Animal experiments will continue so long as we have legal abortions. Once we rationalized that, any fucking thing goes.

  • i think the nhs should have a list of all these members of that gruop she represents, and they should not be allowed to benefit from medical advances animal testing has given us.

  • BUAV, PETA and similar organizations are about as misanthropic as organized religion.

  • People...do you not understand that there is no need to test on animals...1) Why not use ourselves, WE are the ones the product will be used on, not animals. 2)there are many alternatives that we can use.

    Why do you think it is fair to use animals for OUR benefit?

    If a human comes up with a disease, let them die...It's MEANT to be.

  • come back and say that when some1 u love is dieing and can be helped with a anmial tested treatment

  • Dear, you have a point. But the fact that someone you love is dying does not justify the need to use an animal to save a life. In a nut shell, plain and simple....let animals live their life, and we live ours.

  • well i do think it justifys it becuse i dont see animals as my equal and i would kill evry dog in the world if it would save some1 i love. do u realize that we are the only once that cares (if we dont include pets) about other animals. other animals dont give a shit about u or any other animal, for them its only about survival. i love animals 2 but not enough to let ppl die

  • Well the promlem is, killing every dog in the world doesn't save anyone.

  • Only 1-1.5% of dogs and cats are actually used in animal testing annually

  • Well, there is no need to use animals..it's 2008 there are plenty other things that we can use to test things on.with the way technology has changed, animals shouldn't even be a factor..we don't need to take something/someone who is helpless and not an equal being like us, and use them for our benefit..its very unfair and just goes to show that people have no empathy for other creatures that live on this earth..and that's the sort of the thing I'm talkin about..why don't you think they're equal?

  • they are not equal becuse i have no idea, is just how i feel.

    so ur saying that scientest knows thier are other ways to test medicine but they chose to ignore it so they can continue abusing animals becuse they get off on it?

    btw how the hell are u supose to test how a living biengs body is gona react to a new drug without using an animal?

  • cloning human skin?

  • ok, soo many products dont soo i dont get the point it is a waist to test on animals

  • Why make out that only bad has come out of testing on animals? Your Life or an animal suffering, Pick One.Nah you love the animals too much right? just make sure if your daughter/son falls ill with a disease that may had been cured with testing on animals to tell him/her you were the one who helped close animal testing "you're dying because i didnt want to see the poor animals suffering" say those words please =D

  • you guys are bitching about animals experimentation? wow, how else are we to even SUGGEST the medical procedure would be safe for humans without testing on the next thing to humans? even know humans are like big animals. you know animal ''rights'' really only came into existance around 50 years ago, beyond that, animals were a means to mankinds end thousands of years before the 50's

  • god never made it that we needed to use animals for experiments for somethig that is our benifit

    if we need it so bad, i'd like to do it to you

    fuck, take a whole bunch of emo ppl from the world, they dont deserve life.

    animals have the sam amount right to live on the world with us without being butchered for our own sick reasonings.

  • u should know that god made animals for adam and eve as food, and jesus casted out a demon from a person and placed it in a bunch of pigs instead, so witch god are u talking about?

  • for food, yes

    not for experimentation.

    they dont deserve that

    & since when do we eat monkeys???

  • there are ppl in the world that do eat monkeys

  • you guys are bitching about animals experimentation? wow, how else are we to even SUGGEST the medical procedure would be safe for humans without testing on the next thing to humans? even know humans are like big animals. you know animal ''rights'' really only came into existance around 50 years ago, beyond that, animals were a means to mankinds end thousands of years before the 50's

  • without these images u would have died of breast cancer some long time ago .. and ironically u wouldnt be showing ur video here .. think my lady before u speak

  • Marios:  They have created and cured cancer in mice for 30 years and yet haven't made ANY PROGRESS in preventing cancer or curing it in humans. Just how brain washed are you? There is no cure for breast cancer!!!! There is only earlier diagnoses for it jackass.

  • boreing

  • 'n' aye i dont give a **** about human suffering were the dominant species we solve our problems, we can choose, animals cant, id much rather 100random humans die than a rat

  • your so right!!!!!! god some1 who thinks like meh!!!!! did you hear bout the cat Kogenta search for it kogenta cat touture on google its horrible had me crying a lot! poor kitty STUPID MAN I WANT HIM TO DIE WHEN IM BIG IM GONNA GO TO JAPAN AND KILL HIM!!!!plz respond to me I need some1 who hates animal cruelty(sp?) as much as I do

  • aye and as shocking as it is i favour my 14year old dalmations life over my mums :P and aye i still live wit her :P

  • yeah I know how you feel I rather save my cats then my friends, I mean my I just love my cats soooo much there my babys ! animals are way to inccoent and humans who abuse of them sould(sp?) be killed slowly! im gonna add u as a friend :)

  • aye ty not tat i ever make vids but aye :P

  • hey my cats they where posiend all 5 of them, by my neighbor on pourpos(sp?) I NEEDD TO KILL THEM!!! Im crying so bad ill never see them agai n I miss them a lot

  • well do what i do whenever i get upset. think to myself "if i ever get to pissed off. or i find out i got leek 3days to live. get the biggest wepon i can find (minigun most perferd) and go two a slaughter house. and kill them cuntflaps" cheers me up =D orrr. maybe just tie 1 up by a leg. and tie his arms behind his back. then slash at his torso with a cleaver 2times. chop his arms and legs off. and leave him there to die =D

  • haha

    XD

  • This is so true even in the USA. Check out my hidden footage at the University Of Wisconsin called BUCKYSTEIN #4. Stop the insanity!

  • whoever thinks this is cruel, your cruel u eat slaughterd animals go watch a slaughter house thingy on here, its horrific, u claim this is cruel your jsut as bad if u eat meat, and aye people shud volenteer or get paid to test drugs or w/e on humans, gives u a big smile when u find out 7died =D

  • Dougpecklord, you have no idea what you are talking about do you? Did you even watch my video called "BUCKYSTEIN #4" before you wrote this comment? WATCH IT AND LEARN THE TRUTH!

  • no i didnt

  • yes you did.....dougpeckerlord

  • did i? i doubt i did

  • ...........

Loading...
Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more