If you compare only to what you know, you won't find 'the unknown' in the equation. Got to complete the equation [1][2]=[3] to prevent (subject). You may have to simplify or scale-down things first.
If a cause is not dealth with, *almost* nothing changes until a 1/2 'pos/neg-double-bell curve' cycle is completed. Inversion then occurs.
A full pos/neg-double-bell curve would be a wave. It might be stabilised, if understood what the "disturbances" are, and acted upon occordingly.
Excuse my Ignorance?Your definition mean that for example a paedophiles convicted of raping its own child & that child then goes into care. Now a prison is funded by the government to keep him/her in prison & the new carers for the child are paid benefits for adopting/fostering the child, all of which is making our GDP go up & isnt the GDP the single most important measure of macroeconomic performance? I prefer my definition, its more aligned with nature than your definition of a man made system
None of you here have the faintest understanding of a market economy or basic principles of economics. I therefore have no idea how to debate with you all because you don't understand what you are arguing against (the market economy in any form) and so your arguments are either irrelevant or patently absurd.
@Esoparagon Yes all that Quantitative easing is is very economic. Planned obsolescence is very economic,. This economy is so economic that 1% of the world owns 60% of the wealth leaving 99% of us to fight over 40% & we better be quick because that piece of the pie is getting smaller each day!
@MIKOLBZ That's a different definition; not what we are talking about. - An economy consists of the economic system of a country or other area; the labor, capital and land resources; and the manufacturing, production, trade, distribution, and consumption of goods and services of that area. A market economy is an economy in which decisions regarding investment, production and distribution are based on supply and demand and the prices of goods and services are determined in a free price system.
@MIKOLBZ Stop mixing up terms. Economic, economics and market economy are different things all together. You haven't got the fainted idea what my position is nor do you have the slightest understanding of how a market economy works. I don't advocate the current conditions!
@MIKOLBZ Case in point of your ignorance. An economy isn't a fixed sum of wealth that people fight over, it is an ever expanding pie that people produce. When someone earns $500 they have produced $500 worth of wealth. They didn't fight over it. It's not gone from the pie. The $500 represents the stored wealth they created that they may then trade back in the future. Every trade is results in new wealth.
@MIKOLBZ Therefore, given a market economy in which people truly have to earn their money, it doesn't matter how much they earn or how much of a percentage they have.
what this Linsely 121 is say is exactly what he is talking about, people dont get things aout of this air , all things will be hard, the thoughts of change will be hardest to do especially in the way things need to change. watch his again....
video was very informative, but what people was saying was stupid...oh the folks on the comments...wow oh and yes are born equally blank. hmm this guy has more engineering science u ever seen, wrong person to be going against....oh yeah you would have heard that if you paid better attention.
This isn't utopia. All of this reality have to change, and will. Believe me ... When the air becomes unpropriaty to us, the food, the quality of life as usual, you will beg for it.
Technology will eventually do away with the need for trade. When you have constant access to what you need and want, why would you need to trade with someone? The monetary system is outdated.
He is the davinci of the era. Think about this, if you talk to an indian from machu pichu who leaves on a village where he must walk for 2 days to obtain enough water for his family and you ask tell him that you could built a system in which he can obtain water from a foddet right in his home, The machu pichu indian will repsonde... What am i suppuse to do during the week. we must be open to this information and not make barries. Lets listen and ask question instead of blocking or denying
@ocarina2boy 1)) Its not surprising on how often i run into younglings that carry out the logic you just stated above. You say," 99% of the human inhabitants are completely fucked intellectually and do not deserve a better way of life, so fuck em"....I would love to see the proof you have that suggest 99% of humans are this way and even if this is correct you then need to "step out of the box" and understand why these people have this behavior... (cont)
@ocarina2boy 2)) (cont) which is simply because of their culture and conditioning, so don’t blame the people, because they don’t have a choice of what kind of conditioning their raised into..so its not their fault... If you continue to say "I don’t care" then you already let this negative conditioning and environment win the war. (cont)
@ocarina2boy 3)) (cont)And you say " I am NOT going to procreate, so I have no emotional stake in this planet's future", but you don’t even realize how ignorant and naive of a statement that is..because i bet you anything you have a family that tends to grow, i bet you have friends that will go on to live life and (possibly) have kids that you will gain a bond with, or even, I bet you will find a girl and whether its intentional or not you will probably have a kid. (cont)
@ocarina2boy 4)) The only people that I see that holds your logic are usually either minors that hold a lot of anger, minors that are assuming the way their mindset will be 10/20/30/40 years down the road, or people that have put in everything to only have lost everything. Don’t become such a hard headed individual, (cont)
@ocarina2boy 5)) (cont)becuz I’m sure you would want the world to become a better place (whether or not it will actually happen), but by flat out saying "fuck em all" and continuing with a negative outlook towards it is not helping the cause but hurting it even more. For example: if i raised a kid and always told him/her that they will NEVER learn to play an instrument, and i said this over and over...what do you think the chances will be of this kid actually learning an instrument. (cont)
@ocarina2boy 6) (cont) I’m sorry that you let society win, you let it make you give up on salvation, peace, and humanity…the reason you are alive is because of these “fucked up people”, so give them a chance. I just hope that you are a young guy, if so, then there is still much more for you to learn, therefore your attitude towards this movement will change drastically, if not, then I can only hope the best…(cont)
@ocarina2boy 7) (cont) for you. I use to look at things the way you do when I was a teen but now that I have opened my head, opened my education, and opened up to listening to others, I have gained a more optimistic perspective.
@ocarina2boy And that position is valid. However, if the crises are set to arrive in your lifetime, you do have a stake in the future: your own life. Of course, the degree to which this is true is the degree to which you should feel motivated.
@ocarina2boy You do realize that the structure of the human brain is slightly different, compared to gorillas, within anatomy, genetics, visual processes and speech it is clear why we show further consciousness. The extent of our brain is an evolutionary leap forward from the monkey family. So comparing such an act as you did so, as if it is a legitimate excuse, doesn’t seem to fully apply.
@ocarina2boy . Although, a prime ape has been seen to hold an impressive intelligence, it has to be understood that it must be raised in a positive environment that challenges the train of thought in order to do so. However, when man is brought up into an environment of similar qualities...cont.
@ocarina2boy an environment that cherishes others health, one that has no need to gain an upper hand over another for the sake of monetary related behaviors, one that stimulates the human creativity,& one that is able to express a full sense of spirituality would, in turn,show a tremendous ability(to not only survive)but to manage a world with plentiful resources and gain a true identification of an extra-terrestrial.Think of the difficulties of explaining our modern world to ancient Egypt.
@ocarina2boy With this insight, we can construct a glimpse of how society could drastically change due to the further understandings of our surrounding elements and the molding of our values over time within a given environment. It is a beautiful feeling to be standing on the shoulders of others in an endless amount of information growing through time.
@ocarina2boy Well if NO ONE does shit.. then you are not going to have a planet to live on. very long.. do you have any idea how Fast things are going to shit.. because people look the other way or sit on their hands and expect some Government to do it....? theextinctionprotocol (dot) wordpress(dot)com
I require a proof of claim that I have the responsibility to make the world a better place for everyone. That was just dropped in there nonchalantly as if it were self evident.
Do you require a proof of claim that you have the responsibility to live your life too? And if not why haven't you killed yourself? Responsibilities don't have to be met, but they should as meeting them results in long term benefits.
@Esoparagon You're part of everyone, aren't you? So that includes making things better for yourself. Which making things better for everyone is the best way to make things better for yourself.
@mmw818s No, it's not. Marginal utility clearly shows this is incorrect. I could work 10 hours and gain all the benefit for myself or I could work 10 hours and have all the work spread between me and the rest of everyone. In the second scenario I only get a tiny fraction of what I worked for. You have much more incentive and rational reason to work extra hours for yourself than you do to work extra hours and only see a tiny fraction of that benefit. Working for yourself is the best way.
@Esoparagon And then you get cancer, or you get in a car accident, or you can't afford gasoline. If any of these three problems were solved, everyone's lives including your own become much better. And trying to solve these problems with people is a lot easier than trying to solve them alone.
What you said would be true if you were the only one working for a total of 10 people. But if 10 people are working for each other, then what you said wouldn't be true.
@mmw818s I didn't say working alone, I said for myself. There is a big difference. Cooperating is the key to society but you do it to better your own life. Trade is mutually beneficial so you both benefit. The cancer researcher gets a salary. It might be true if I put in one extra hour of work and then everyone else also put in one extra hour of work then it would average out. But then if I want more, I must force everyone else to want more. I can't better myself by my own volition.
@Esoparagon It sounded like you meant working alone when you said you work for 10 hours and the benefits are spread across other people. That's only less efficient if the rest of the people are not working. Otherwise, it is true that it's better to work for everyone's benefit including your own, instead of just working for yourself.
What you said about cancer research is not entirely true. They profit off of continually treating people. If you cure the people, the treatments stop.
@Esoparagon Because this means a better world for you to live as well. Everything you thow around gets back at you. Whether actions or sentiments/ideas of your own, because you are/became/participate of that what you do/say/think. Ex: that will consequently bring like-minded individuous to be your friends, and if those are selfish as well, they won't really care about you and you'll be let down. Newton's third law applies to society in this context, understand...?
@mrhoustonn If everyone acts selfishly to make their own lives better through the mechanism of trade then that also means a better world for me. I want selfish people on this planet. I wouldn't want them to work towards anything other than their own self interest. That's what produces all the great things in society.
@Esoparagon The process you speak of is no longer tenable. Such a process has served its purpose, and must now be overcome. It must be overcome because it is punctuated with peril. Not just peril for humanity, but as well as total environment. To claim that the commerce or free markets (assuming this is your position), regardless of regulation or not, will somehow find a way out of its own demise, requires as much faith as Fresco's system, if not more.
@Esoparagon In fact, it requires more, because the trends of the current system have a lousy record, thus raising doubts about its ability to change. And if the crises that lay ahead are as true as scientists are predicting, and approaching faster than prediction, then everyone will be wise to awaken to the predicament facing civilization. To change, it requires crisis and new values. Fresco anticipates a crisis and he is preparing for it by planting seeds in values.
@Esoparagon It has been Fresco's attempt to change people's values so that they become functional toward a goal that serves a longer term: the future. If only people lived longer, they would recognize what they stand to gain by working toward a new system to avoid future crises. However, as it is, for the people who do fear, they fear for their children and grandchildren, and believe that the crises will only come in their time. Evidently, even this fear is not enough.
@Esoparagon 1))) I don’t get this sentence, "if everyone acts selfishly to make their own lives better through trade then that also means a better world for me".....how is it that a group of people that only cares about their individual self is suppose to make things better in the long run? if u understand human behavior then you will notice that selfish behavior will only create a disaster of chaos, this is obvious by looking at the world today. (cont)
@Esoparagon 2)) Ancient (and present) cultures (small tribes, that is) that uphold a resource based model hardly carry out violence or superiority...now look at the most capitalistic country on the planet (U.S) and you will see the opposite, carrying out the highest forms of violence amongst others. To be selfish will (without a doubt) create a negative correlation to social progress.(cont)
@Esoparagon Nothing in the universe is individual, for everything lives upon an environment that relies on the action and reaction of other energies, nature is a dictatorship, we must learn to live in harmony with it or suffer the inevitable consequences.
@Esoparagon You say"most violent societies that exist"..i would love 2 see the proof u have to back up that information.Horticultural soceities, such as the indians of north america, were very peaceful societies. & yet when u look at Columbus u notice a complete genoncide put out upon the indians by these religious finatics. I can tell that you have never taken a sociology class. Tribal societies virtually had no violence from within, it wasnt until someone invaded them then they would attack
@Linsley121 "most violent society" i just cant believe you would say that. I mean, gosh, the US is the only country who dropped the most terrifying bomb on a city of innocent people..and your telling me that indians, with their cultural values, are the most violent. im sorry ive never heard that accusation before
@Esoparagon how can you say the US (for example) is more civilized internally then tribal societies?? i would love to see the proof you have back up that statement. How is it that a small tribal society could live and contiue living with extreme internal violence?its impossible, thats why tribal societies are so peaceful (not to mention their morals play a factor) Dont you know that US (the most capitialist society) has the highest rates of internal violence compared to anyother nation??
@Linsley121 I said through trade. I didn't say if people did whatever they simply thought would benefit them in the moment. They make things better by producing and selling. There is more value for everyone. The more people want, the more they must produce and sell. If you understand basic economic theory, you understand how selfish behaviour channeled through trade will create wealth and prosperity.
@Esoparagon you say "selfish behavior channeled through trade will create wealth and prosperity"...ok so how is this?when you have a world that will always have more poor people then rich people because of the mechanics of the monetary system.I guess i could say i dont understand the economic theory because then again it is just a theory that capitalist uphold,as if this theory was created by people that actually knew the sciences of culture and behavior.These people never leave the money charts
@Esonparagon This is the 21stcentury,not the year100,therefore theres no reason why we need to uphold an ancient social stratified system.How is it that a CEO of a cigerette company creating wealth & prosperity for anybody besides the few selected within the company?How is it that a monetary system will even need to exist if technology keeps improving at the rate it has?Human labor will become a thing of the past & humanity will finally become the main priority once we stop chasing the $ signs
@Linsley121 If you don't understand how pivotal and vital the CEOs position in creating wealth is then you simply don't understand what a business is and what it is they do when they make profit through trade. Money will always have to exist for society to exist. Technological advancement doesn't do anything to effect its function. Human labour will always be necessary but will change in form as it has radically over the past 100 years. That will continue and that's good.
Human activity will always be necessary, but in a creative, challenging, problem-solving sense, not like many tasks today enforced by need for monetary values. Finance/money is just an inadequate system developed by mankind to manage resources. Once we remove boundaries in thinking, overcome egoism and enforced profit striving with its inhumane, exploitive impacts by creating unbiased sorrounding conditions, artificial scarcity will vanish and money will have no purpose anymore.
@Esoparagon The main purpose of technology is to free people from irrieelevent repetetive jobs. Now if you understand that you must know that we will get to a point in which technoology could advance to a point were we can use natural reseouceres to provide ilimitated amount of free reneweble energy and have the technology that will automate must of things. We must use technology to free us. It will not take 100 yeasr for it to happen,
@marioarce86 I agree on the point of technology. I agree eventually we will engineer very cheap energy. And I agree things will be automated. I disagree on the implications put forth. All these things could and would happen under laissez-faire capitalism and would not get rid of the need of money and so on.
@Esoparagon you need to do your research. money was intended to be a commodity not the essence of your existence. If you think that you need money to learn guitar explore the stars learn biology and surf every weekend to enjoy life that you CANT see outside the monetary system. In the system we live in now we are only able to do this with money. money is freedom hence no money means slave... A slaves keeps being a slave because he becomes comfortable with his current "standards" of living..
@marioarce86 Where are you going to get your biology text book? Where are you going to get your guitar? Or your guitar lessons? Where are you getting your surf board and the food that fuels it. What you just said to me is ridiculous. The act of surfing is free but it requires some materials. Reading is free but it requires things to read. I certainly don't think money is the essence of my existence. I said money is necessary for trade and thus for goods and services to be produced.
@Linsley121 2. (continued) the money that the lower class man pays into interest goes straight to the upperclass man with the 4% CD, therefore the rich is literally stealing money from the poor, only getting richer in the long run. And of coarse labor will be wipped out becuase of technology,MIT economist claim that within decades technology will destroy virtually all middle class jobs.So how will these billions of people get money for labor? we have to start rethinking what the use of(contiued
@Linsley121 3 (continued) human labor must be used towards and how that will completly dissolve the idea of money exchange. Its quite shocking to see how many people defend Capitalism and the US constitution not realizing how even the word capitialism or banking was never imprinted on the document anywhere. 90% of all crimes are monetary relatede one way or another, so right there you see that if we evolve from this primitive notion then we diminish nearly all crime.
@Linsley121 Well the current system in the US and elsewhere isn't ideal and should be changed but making interest on your bank deposits originally came from the fact that the bank would lend out some of your money at interest so that businesses could get capital up front that is otherwise just sitting around to undertake projects that great profit for them that they can then use to pay off the loan with and in return the bank gives you a cut from the interest repaid. No one steals anything.
@Linsley121 The idea that technology will lead to unemployment is such an old fallacy I don't know how to even get it across that it's a load of nonsense. Do you really think there will be robots creating goods and services and people sitting around with no money to buy them? It's just absurd. The types of jobs change as the technology around them advances. The jobs people will be doing in the future, we can't even fathom at present. Neo-luddite paranoia is all it is.
@Esoparagon 1 how is it that technology will not diminish human labor?u have 0 proof to back that up. look at youtube for example, its basically free to watch this video over and over..yes u have to pay to power ur computer but thats only because we live in a monetary system. How is it so hard for u to understand that we follow an ancient tradition that is no longer necessary? its like as if an astronomer still believed the Earth was flat, thats impossible..because once you open up to new (cont)
@Esoparagon 2 (cont) infromation and research (technology) you must let go of ancients notions of the way things work. Capitalism is your religion, i could easily illustrate how technology has been created a negative affect towards human labor since the invention of the cotton gin..man use to build cars, now machines do it..man use to drive car but now computer can do that..man use to do surgery now computers can do that. All service sectors have felt the affect of technology producing (cont0
@Esoparagon 3 (cont) more efficient products and a faster rate, also it is cost efficient for a business to buy machines because machines arent people. Like i said economist for MIT have already announced how middle wage jobs will become obsolete in the near future. The monetary system will be forced to change as technology grows, look at history, from egalitarian societies, to horticultural societies, to industrialism to capitalism and ect...the change is inevitable, capitalism will (cont0
@Esoparagon have to change, the monetary system is useless, now it holds man back from achieving their highest levels of education, nutrition, and social well being. and if u deny then please explain to me how capitalism is helping the thousands of african boys dying each day? or the islams dying because the US military must invade their country to illegally claim resources on foreign land? or the thousands of poverty stricken cities in the US alone? The day will come when (cont)
@Esoparagon 5 (cont) the people of the world will realize that we live on the same planet, therefore trading with ourselves is useless...we must work together if we tend to have our species exsist for the long run. Go back and study the begining of libraries, hard headed capitalist back then use to believe it would be impossible for man to borrow books without stealing them, but obviously they were wrong. Libraries should be the focus of the way we use products. People forget (cont)
@Esoparagon 6 (cont) that when they use a product, its not that they need to keep it, its just that they need to use it...if you cant understand why on a phinite planet everyone can not have one of everything (which is the exact mentality produced by capitalism). Did you know that today americans consume twice as much as they did 70years ago? did you know that if the entire world lived like americans then we would need 4 Earths to subside for the resources? Capitalism worked through a (cont)
@Esoparagon 7 (cont) narrow percpective that the earth couldnt run out of anything, with todays knowledge we know thats not true. There is not one resource today that isnt being threatened by our cyclical consumption. Most defenders of capitalism say that man will begin to only work through advertising..now i want to ask you..is that honestly a healthy task we should be putting our kids towards? something that conditions other people to by their products? i think thats ridicolous to (cont)
@Esoparagon 1.how have i not pointed out casual or realistic economics or true economic history? Do u know the word economics means to not waste and to conserve, so when you look at capitalism you can see how it is the opposite, completly wasteful for the sake of money. If you dont think inequality is importanat then your not recongizing it. How is trying to provide the highest forms of education to everyone bad?..(cont)
@Esoparagon 2.(cont) how is providing healthy food and resources for people bad (whether or not they were born rich or poor)? how is allowing people to grow up in a safe, respectable, caring environment bad? how is making everyone equal for the sake of allowing them to achieve what humans are successful at a bad thing? you defend the dollar sign like a christian defends the cross.
@Esoparagon 3And how is planned obsolescence not important?capitalist always say "if its a crappy product then people wont buy it"..thats such a false statement i cant believe people say that. Havnt you ever researched how bad the nutrition is in the food we eat? From a fast food restraunt (McDonalds) to a grocery store, people still buy that food even though its bad, Havnt u been to a Walmart?those products are made as cheap as they can get away with. Havnt you owned a car?those are some (cont
@Esoparagon 4 (cont) of the most inefficeint machines we build to this day. and if you still dont agree that planned obsolescence is not bad or does not go far in the free market, then i can easily name a million other examples (literally) and i bet you wont recongnise one of them for the sake of your religion. So with that said you begin to realize how much waste we create. even plastic is completly unecessary to still use. The fact that you dont think planned obsolescence is important (cont)
@Esoparagon 5(cont) proves my point on how hard it is for defenders of our current economic system donot recognize that we live on a phinite planet. we do not have unlimited resources here, but the concept of the amount of money can expand for an infinity.you have yet to show me any proof to your opinions, becuz you cant find any, and i dont mean by googling it, i mean actually researching. I can break down capitalism as easily as it is to break down christianity and all of there false claims.
@Linsley121 As the other guy said, economize, economics and economy have to different definitions. Economics analyzes the production, distribution, and consumption of goods and services. You're muddling up concepts and definitions.
@Esoparagon 8 (cont) turn generations of humans into slaves working day in and day out to promote a product for the sake of money (something that isnt physically tangible in the first place). The idea that equality is bad came from the conditioning of the US during the rise of communism (which isnt actually communism) the Soviets, china, cuba and so on were all dictatorships labeled as communism just to make it look bad. If u actually studied the logics and orgins of communism then you (cont)
@Esoparagon 9 (cont) would realize that its impossible for it to work through a monetary system because money is automatically unequal. if you went back to the 1600's and tried to explain to rich white protastants that in the future slavery will change and a black man would have just as much rights as a white man, they would laugh at u and say that impossible.(cont)
@Esoparagon 10 (cont) now thats just me outlining an analogy of how im telling you that money wont need to exsist, but you laugh at me and say thats impossible...see your not understanding how the human species is prone to change how it conducts itself over time and with further knowledge. The only reason most people defend capitalism is because the level of conditioning they have experienced, they dont know anything else, so y would then doubt it
@Linsley121 I do recognize inequality but I don't think it's important. We are born unequal. Get over it. Inequality isn't bad. Trying to make everyone equal is. Planned obsolescence isn't important. If a business does it, they will either go out of business as people go to a more reliable producer or they will not care enough because it's cheap enough for them not to care. Either way it doesn't matter.
@Esoparagon 1. Defenders of the capitalistic notion hardly recognize things such as "planned obsolesence", "structural classism", or even "inequality"...there notions or suggestions hardly even leave the money sequences. What proof do u have that shows wealth and prosperity has been increasing? how is it that an upper classman putting a million$ on a 4%cd at their bank(essentially making free money with no external output) helps the lower class man borrowing money at interest,because(continued
hey. please try to enable the stranscribed subtitles again. youtube sometimes tells you that "the auto transcription failed". but when you try again it succeeds. please try.
Great lecture, I appreciate how this one seems particularly well delivered in comparison to later ones that seem more chaotic, although the content is equally useful. Very nice.
I am sorry, but i dont like to see mr Fresco making drawings one over another.. i only can understand that there is no organization.. By the way, i really like mr Fresco. A LOT! :)
Jacque Fresco is a wonderful human being and to say he is a genius is to comment on the sky being blue..it's obvious and equally unimportant. The research and the message is undeniably true and we should focus on the research and these lessons, not idolize Fresco as that totally misses the point. Over the years I have scrutinized his work and looked at it from many angles...humanity will evolve into a type 1 society (re:Michio Kaku), but only if we implement the RBE...but this is 100 years away
Your ideas and insights for humankinds future is that of a pure genius.. Thankyou for waking me up from this nightmare world that i live in today and giving me hope for a better and beautiful future.
Jacque, I promise that i will continue with your dream any way I can. I believe in you and strangley understand you no matter how dificult of a topic you bring up. Your awareness is so precise and makes 100% perfect sense. You are that man dancing behind the flickering light and we will all become that highly advanced camera!
@Ken11091990 Yes. He believes that if someone were preserved for too long and then reintroduced to the world, they would have a very difficult time coping with the world around them. Daily life and the values of people would be so different.
@Ken11091990 Cryonics not cryongenics if you are talking about human cryopreservation.
He has, I have asked him this and his response was that he does not think that future civilizations will want to bring people back as it is hard enough trying to change the values of someone with out bringing them and their relatives back with old values. I meant my question to ask him if he thinks that the forward thinking nature of the cryopreserved meant future people would have empathy,but havent asked yet
@aprox23 Certainly. "The Best That Money Can't Buy" is best to read. However if you can't afford to buy it, you can get the ebook "Designing the Future" for free. His first book, "Looking Forward" has been converted to ebook and can also be found for free. That is all that is available online right now. Just search those titles. You'll find something.
@diegomur You fucking piece of shit. Go and die you worthless cum stain. Jacque and Roxanne have both worked tirelessly in this direction for the betterment of humankind for no monetary gains. They have put in many of their years and money in planning, designing and constructing elements of this vision without outside support. How about you get off Alex Jones' dick? He enjoys profiting from cunts like you who hook, line and sinker propaganda while you watch his advertisements. Reptilian fuckers.
@95ekim Fresco has always known the need to remove the monetary system. Here he is speaking at Nichols College which is a far right wing conservative pro free-market university. Speaking about the removal of the monetary system might have been too offensive for such people, and might have turned them off right away.
probably the best lecture ive seen of his - hes got hearing problems now and hes alittle slower - still sharp though - but more so here at i guess 81 ish
Me thinking:
If you compare only to what you know, you won't find 'the unknown' in the equation. Got to complete the equation [1][2]=[3] to prevent (subject). You may have to simplify or scale-down things first.
If a cause is not dealth with, *almost* nothing changes until a 1/2 'pos/neg-double-bell curve' cycle is completed. Inversion then occurs.
A full pos/neg-double-bell curve would be a wave. It might be stabilised, if understood what the "disturbances" are, and acted upon occordingly.
ergoTheVenusProject 2 days ago
needs 7 billion views
mysteryjet2007 2 days ago 4
Excuse my Ignorance?Your definition mean that for example a paedophiles convicted of raping its own child & that child then goes into care. Now a prison is funded by the government to keep him/her in prison & the new carers for the child are paid benefits for adopting/fostering the child, all of which is making our GDP go up & isnt the GDP the single most important measure of macroeconomic performance? I prefer my definition, its more aligned with nature than your definition of a man made system
MIKOLBZ 2 days ago
None of you here have the faintest understanding of a market economy or basic principles of economics. I therefore have no idea how to debate with you all because you don't understand what you are arguing against (the market economy in any form) and so your arguments are either irrelevant or patently absurd.
Esoparagon 3 days ago
@Esoparagon Whats economic about the ecenomics? How is a fiat currency with its infinite growth paradigm sustainable in a finite world?
MIKOLBZ 3 days ago
@MIKOLBZ Fiat money is not economics. Nor is it an intrinsic part of a market economy. Nor is it what I advocate.
Esoparagon 3 days ago
@MIKOLBZ In addition, infinite economic growth is possible with finite resources.
Esoparagon 3 days ago
@Esoparagon Yes all that Quantitative easing is is very economic. Planned obsolescence is very economic,. This economy is so economic that 1% of the world owns 60% of the wealth leaving 99% of us to fight over 40% & we better be quick because that piece of the pie is getting smaller each day!
MIKOLBZ 2 days ago
@MIKOLBZ Economy: Efficiently & conservatively orient the materials for production & distribution of life supporting goods.
MIKOLBZ 2 days ago
@MIKOLBZ That's a different definition; not what we are talking about. - An economy consists of the economic system of a country or other area; the labor, capital and land resources; and the manufacturing, production, trade, distribution, and consumption of goods and services of that area. A market economy is an economy in which decisions regarding investment, production and distribution are based on supply and demand and the prices of goods and services are determined in a free price system.
Esoparagon 2 days ago
@MIKOLBZ Stop mixing up terms. Economic, economics and market economy are different things all together. You haven't got the fainted idea what my position is nor do you have the slightest understanding of how a market economy works. I don't advocate the current conditions!
Esoparagon 2 days ago
@MIKOLBZ Case in point of your ignorance. An economy isn't a fixed sum of wealth that people fight over, it is an ever expanding pie that people produce. When someone earns $500 they have produced $500 worth of wealth. They didn't fight over it. It's not gone from the pie. The $500 represents the stored wealth they created that they may then trade back in the future. Every trade is results in new wealth.
Esoparagon 2 days ago
@MIKOLBZ Therefore, given a market economy in which people truly have to earn their money, it doesn't matter how much they earn or how much of a percentage they have.
Esoparagon 2 days ago
No way society will change its' mindset without destroying itself before. Task is far to large.
derek8171 4 days ago
@derek8171 We'll rebuild from the ashes and ruins then.
technatezin 3 days ago
this deserves more clicks. period.
kon4251 4 days ago
Genius. WHERE ARE THEEEESE PEOPLEEEEEEEE
labulashvili 5 days ago
contiued....
what this Linsely 121 is say is exactly what he is talking about, people dont get things aout of this air , all things will be hard, the thoughts of change will be hardest to do especially in the way things need to change. watch his again....
naturalbeautylvr 6 days ago in playlist Uploaded videos
video was very informative, but what people was saying was stupid...oh the folks on the comments...wow oh and yes are born equally blank. hmm this guy has more engineering science u ever seen, wrong person to be going against....oh yeah you would have heard that if you paid better attention.
naturalbeautylvr 6 days ago in playlist Uploaded videos
This isn't utopia. All of this reality have to change, and will. Believe me ... When the air becomes unpropriaty to us, the food, the quality of life as usual, you will beg for it.
We have to open ours minds, only this.
imortal999 6 days ago
Welcome to earth! We ignore the geniuses and give random people who simply assert "YES WE CAN" a fucking nobel peace prize. fucking bullshit.
dreamvoidTV 1 week ago
Technology will eventually do away with the need for trade. When you have constant access to what you need and want, why would you need to trade with someone? The monetary system is outdated.
knglerxst 1 week ago
He is the davinci of the era. Think about this, if you talk to an indian from machu pichu who leaves on a village where he must walk for 2 days to obtain enough water for his family and you ask tell him that you could built a system in which he can obtain water from a foddet right in his home, The machu pichu indian will repsonde... What am i suppuse to do during the week. we must be open to this information and not make barries. Lets listen and ask question instead of blocking or denying
marioarce86 1 week ago
So interesting.
ThatIsWhatYouGet 1 week ago in playlist Uploaded videos
Probably one of the greatest hours of my life. Thanks, Jacque.
givemericht 1 week ago
To clarify, "creating unbiased sourrounding conditions" will be with a sustainable resource-based economy.
Enrakon 1 week ago in playlist Favorite videos
It just keeps getting crazier and crazier....
VoidOnTuesday 1 week ago
religion is distortion, leadership is war, relationship is peace.
jinjanco23 2 weeks ago
Comment removed
jinjanco23 2 weeks ago
@ocarina2boy 1)) Its not surprising on how often i run into younglings that carry out the logic you just stated above. You say," 99% of the human inhabitants are completely fucked intellectually and do not deserve a better way of life, so fuck em"....I would love to see the proof you have that suggest 99% of humans are this way and even if this is correct you then need to "step out of the box" and understand why these people have this behavior... (cont)
Linsley121 2 weeks ago
@ocarina2boy 2)) (cont) which is simply because of their culture and conditioning, so don’t blame the people, because they don’t have a choice of what kind of conditioning their raised into..so its not their fault... If you continue to say "I don’t care" then you already let this negative conditioning and environment win the war. (cont)
Linsley121 2 weeks ago
@ocarina2boy 3)) (cont)And you say " I am NOT going to procreate, so I have no emotional stake in this planet's future", but you don’t even realize how ignorant and naive of a statement that is..because i bet you anything you have a family that tends to grow, i bet you have friends that will go on to live life and (possibly) have kids that you will gain a bond with, or even, I bet you will find a girl and whether its intentional or not you will probably have a kid. (cont)
Linsley121 2 weeks ago
@ocarina2boy 4)) The only people that I see that holds your logic are usually either minors that hold a lot of anger, minors that are assuming the way their mindset will be 10/20/30/40 years down the road, or people that have put in everything to only have lost everything. Don’t become such a hard headed individual, (cont)
Linsley121 2 weeks ago
@ocarina2boy 5)) (cont)becuz I’m sure you would want the world to become a better place (whether or not it will actually happen), but by flat out saying "fuck em all" and continuing with a negative outlook towards it is not helping the cause but hurting it even more. For example: if i raised a kid and always told him/her that they will NEVER learn to play an instrument, and i said this over and over...what do you think the chances will be of this kid actually learning an instrument. (cont)
Linsley121 2 weeks ago
@ocarina2boy 6) (cont) I’m sorry that you let society win, you let it make you give up on salvation, peace, and humanity…the reason you are alive is because of these “fucked up people”, so give them a chance. I just hope that you are a young guy, if so, then there is still much more for you to learn, therefore your attitude towards this movement will change drastically, if not, then I can only hope the best…(cont)
Linsley121 2 weeks ago
@ocarina2boy 7) (cont) for you. I use to look at things the way you do when I was a teen but now that I have opened my head, opened my education, and opened up to listening to others, I have gained a more optimistic perspective.
Linsley121 2 weeks ago
I agree 150% with this Man!!
Yooshei 2 weeks ago
@ocarina2boy Clearly you are part of that 99 percent.
jackbotman 2 weeks ago
@ocarina2boy And that position is valid. However, if the crises are set to arrive in your lifetime, you do have a stake in the future: your own life. Of course, the degree to which this is true is the degree to which you should feel motivated.
jacquefresco 2 weeks ago
@ocarina2boy You do realize that the structure of the human brain is slightly different, compared to gorillas, within anatomy, genetics, visual processes and speech it is clear why we show further consciousness. The extent of our brain is an evolutionary leap forward from the monkey family. So comparing such an act as you did so, as if it is a legitimate excuse, doesn’t seem to fully apply.
Linsley121 2 weeks ago
@ocarina2boy . Although, a prime ape has been seen to hold an impressive intelligence, it has to be understood that it must be raised in a positive environment that challenges the train of thought in order to do so. However, when man is brought up into an environment of similar qualities...cont.
Linsley121 2 weeks ago
@ocarina2boy an environment that cherishes others health, one that has no need to gain an upper hand over another for the sake of monetary related behaviors, one that stimulates the human creativity,& one that is able to express a full sense of spirituality would, in turn,show a tremendous ability(to not only survive)but to manage a world with plentiful resources and gain a true identification of an extra-terrestrial.Think of the difficulties of explaining our modern world to ancient Egypt.
Linsley121 2 weeks ago
@ocarina2boy With this insight, we can construct a glimpse of how society could drastically change due to the further understandings of our surrounding elements and the molding of our values over time within a given environment. It is a beautiful feeling to be standing on the shoulders of others in an endless amount of information growing through time.
Linsley121 2 weeks ago
@ocarina2boy Well if NO ONE does shit.. then you are not going to have a planet to live on. very long.. do you have any idea how Fast things are going to shit.. because people look the other way or sit on their hands and expect some Government to do it....? theextinctionprotocol (dot) wordpress(dot)com
Aeonpidotcom 2 weeks ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@ocarina2boy Run away, did you?
sunzoo1 2 weeks ago
@ocarina2boy Run away, did you?
sunzoo1 2 weeks ago
@ocarina2boy They are an endangered species after all.
jacquefresco 3 weeks ago
Starting at 34:58 is the most hilarious economics-fail ever. "derp. what are prices? how do they work?"
JesseForgione 4 weeks ago
I wish, I had learned that all at the time when i went to school.
MullinsM182 1 month ago
You know hes been around with all those impressions he picks up.
SorenK1987 1 month ago
I require a proof of claim that I have the responsibility to make the world a better place for everyone. That was just dropped in there nonchalantly as if it were self evident.
Esoparagon 1 month ago in playlist Uploaded videos
@Esoparagon Because it is functionally selfish to do so.
jacquefresco 1 month ago
@Esoparagon
Do you require a proof of claim that you have the responsibility to live your life too? And if not why haven't you killed yourself? Responsibilities don't have to be met, but they should as meeting them results in long term benefits.
donkisiko 1 month ago
@Esoparagon the proof is that if you make a world a better place, you will make a world a lot better for yourself.
pakau 1 month ago
@Esoparagon You're part of everyone, aren't you? So that includes making things better for yourself. Which making things better for everyone is the best way to make things better for yourself.
mmw818s 3 weeks ago
@mmw818s No, it's not. Marginal utility clearly shows this is incorrect. I could work 10 hours and gain all the benefit for myself or I could work 10 hours and have all the work spread between me and the rest of everyone. In the second scenario I only get a tiny fraction of what I worked for. You have much more incentive and rational reason to work extra hours for yourself than you do to work extra hours and only see a tiny fraction of that benefit. Working for yourself is the best way.
Esoparagon 3 weeks ago
@Esoparagon And then you get cancer, or you get in a car accident, or you can't afford gasoline. If any of these three problems were solved, everyone's lives including your own become much better. And trying to solve these problems with people is a lot easier than trying to solve them alone.
What you said would be true if you were the only one working for a total of 10 people. But if 10 people are working for each other, then what you said wouldn't be true.
mmw818s 3 weeks ago
@mmw818s I didn't say working alone, I said for myself. There is a big difference. Cooperating is the key to society but you do it to better your own life. Trade is mutually beneficial so you both benefit. The cancer researcher gets a salary. It might be true if I put in one extra hour of work and then everyone else also put in one extra hour of work then it would average out. But then if I want more, I must force everyone else to want more. I can't better myself by my own volition.
Esoparagon 3 weeks ago
@Esoparagon It sounded like you meant working alone when you said you work for 10 hours and the benefits are spread across other people. That's only less efficient if the rest of the people are not working. Otherwise, it is true that it's better to work for everyone's benefit including your own, instead of just working for yourself.
What you said about cancer research is not entirely true. They profit off of continually treating people. If you cure the people, the treatments stop.
mmw818s 3 weeks ago
@Esoparagon Because this means a better world for you to live as well. Everything you thow around gets back at you. Whether actions or sentiments/ideas of your own, because you are/became/participate of that what you do/say/think. Ex: that will consequently bring like-minded individuous to be your friends, and if those are selfish as well, they won't really care about you and you'll be let down. Newton's third law applies to society in this context, understand...?
think freely, learn, and share
mrhoustonn 2 weeks ago
@mrhoustonn If everyone acts selfishly to make their own lives better through the mechanism of trade then that also means a better world for me. I want selfish people on this planet. I wouldn't want them to work towards anything other than their own self interest. That's what produces all the great things in society.
Esoparagon 2 weeks ago
@Esoparagon The process you speak of is no longer tenable. Such a process has served its purpose, and must now be overcome. It must be overcome because it is punctuated with peril. Not just peril for humanity, but as well as total environment. To claim that the commerce or free markets (assuming this is your position), regardless of regulation or not, will somehow find a way out of its own demise, requires as much faith as Fresco's system, if not more.
jacquefresco 2 weeks ago
@Esoparagon In fact, it requires more, because the trends of the current system have a lousy record, thus raising doubts about its ability to change. And if the crises that lay ahead are as true as scientists are predicting, and approaching faster than prediction, then everyone will be wise to awaken to the predicament facing civilization. To change, it requires crisis and new values. Fresco anticipates a crisis and he is preparing for it by planting seeds in values.
jacquefresco 2 weeks ago
@Esoparagon It has been Fresco's attempt to change people's values so that they become functional toward a goal that serves a longer term: the future. If only people lived longer, they would recognize what they stand to gain by working toward a new system to avoid future crises. However, as it is, for the people who do fear, they fear for their children and grandchildren, and believe that the crises will only come in their time. Evidently, even this fear is not enough.
jacquefresco 2 weeks ago
@Esoparagon 1))) I don’t get this sentence, "if everyone acts selfishly to make their own lives better through trade then that also means a better world for me".....how is it that a group of people that only cares about their individual self is suppose to make things better in the long run? if u understand human behavior then you will notice that selfish behavior will only create a disaster of chaos, this is obvious by looking at the world today. (cont)
Linsley121 2 weeks ago
@Esoparagon 2)) Ancient (and present) cultures (small tribes, that is) that uphold a resource based model hardly carry out violence or superiority...now look at the most capitalistic country on the planet (U.S) and you will see the opposite, carrying out the highest forms of violence amongst others. To be selfish will (without a doubt) create a negative correlation to social progress.(cont)
Linsley121 2 weeks ago
@Esoparagon Nothing in the universe is individual, for everything lives upon an environment that relies on the action and reaction of other energies, nature is a dictatorship, we must learn to live in harmony with it or suffer the inevitable consequences.
Linsley121 2 weeks ago
@Linsley121 Please get a reality check. Tribes are the most violent, vile, primitive societies that exist.
Esoparagon 2 weeks ago
@Esoparagon You say"most violent societies that exist"..i would love 2 see the proof u have to back up that information.Horticultural soceities, such as the indians of north america, were very peaceful societies. & yet when u look at Columbus u notice a complete genoncide put out upon the indians by these religious finatics. I can tell that you have never taken a sociology class. Tribal societies virtually had no violence from within, it wasnt until someone invaded them then they would attack
Linsley121 2 weeks ago
@Linsley121 "most violent society" i just cant believe you would say that. I mean, gosh, the US is the only country who dropped the most terrifying bomb on a city of innocent people..and your telling me that indians, with their cultural values, are the most violent. im sorry ive never heard that accusation before
Linsley121 2 weeks ago
@Linsley121 I didn't say that externally nation states weren't violent. But internally they are much more civilized.
Esoparagon 2 weeks ago
@Esoparagon how can you say the US (for example) is more civilized internally then tribal societies?? i would love to see the proof you have back up that statement. How is it that a small tribal society could live and contiue living with extreme internal violence?its impossible, thats why tribal societies are so peaceful (not to mention their morals play a factor) Dont you know that US (the most capitialist society) has the highest rates of internal violence compared to anyother nation??
Linsley121 1 week ago
@Linsley121 That's just the myth of the noble savage. I've heard of it. It's bunk.
Esoparagon 2 weeks ago
@Esoparagon what is"the myth of the noble savage"? and where is your proof to back that claim?
Linsley121 1 week ago
@Linsley121 I said through trade. I didn't say if people did whatever they simply thought would benefit them in the moment. They make things better by producing and selling. There is more value for everyone. The more people want, the more they must produce and sell. If you understand basic economic theory, you understand how selfish behaviour channeled through trade will create wealth and prosperity.
Esoparagon 2 weeks ago
@Esoparagon This is short sighted. You have to look further.
jacquefresco 2 weeks ago
@Esoparagon you say "selfish behavior channeled through trade will create wealth and prosperity"...ok so how is this?when you have a world that will always have more poor people then rich people because of the mechanics of the monetary system.I guess i could say i dont understand the economic theory because then again it is just a theory that capitalist uphold,as if this theory was created by people that actually knew the sciences of culture and behavior.These people never leave the money charts
Linsley121 2 weeks ago
@Esonparagon This is the 21stcentury,not the year100,therefore theres no reason why we need to uphold an ancient social stratified system.How is it that a CEO of a cigerette company creating wealth & prosperity for anybody besides the few selected within the company?How is it that a monetary system will even need to exist if technology keeps improving at the rate it has?Human labor will become a thing of the past & humanity will finally become the main priority once we stop chasing the $ signs
Linsley121 2 weeks ago
@Linsley121 If you don't understand how pivotal and vital the CEOs position in creating wealth is then you simply don't understand what a business is and what it is they do when they make profit through trade. Money will always have to exist for society to exist. Technological advancement doesn't do anything to effect its function. Human labour will always be necessary but will change in form as it has radically over the past 100 years. That will continue and that's good.
Esoparagon 2 weeks ago
Human activity will always be necessary, but in a creative, challenging, problem-solving sense, not like many tasks today enforced by need for monetary values. Finance/money is just an inadequate system developed by mankind to manage resources. Once we remove boundaries in thinking, overcome egoism and enforced profit striving with its inhumane, exploitive impacts by creating unbiased sorrounding conditions, artificial scarcity will vanish and money will have no purpose anymore.
Enrakon 1 week ago in playlist Liked videos
@Esoparagon The main purpose of technology is to free people from irrieelevent repetetive jobs. Now if you understand that you must know that we will get to a point in which technoology could advance to a point were we can use natural reseouceres to provide ilimitated amount of free reneweble energy and have the technology that will automate must of things. We must use technology to free us. It will not take 100 yeasr for it to happen,
marioarce86 1 week ago
@marioarce86 I agree on the point of technology. I agree eventually we will engineer very cheap energy. And I agree things will be automated. I disagree on the implications put forth. All these things could and would happen under laissez-faire capitalism and would not get rid of the need of money and so on.
Esoparagon 1 week ago
@Esoparagon you need to do your research. money was intended to be a commodity not the essence of your existence. If you think that you need money to learn guitar explore the stars learn biology and surf every weekend to enjoy life that you CANT see outside the monetary system. In the system we live in now we are only able to do this with money. money is freedom hence no money means slave... A slaves keeps being a slave because he becomes comfortable with his current "standards" of living..
marioarce86 1 week ago
@marioarce86 Where are you going to get your biology text book? Where are you going to get your guitar? Or your guitar lessons? Where are you getting your surf board and the food that fuels it. What you just said to me is ridiculous. The act of surfing is free but it requires some materials. Reading is free but it requires things to read. I certainly don't think money is the essence of my existence. I said money is necessary for trade and thus for goods and services to be produced.
Esoparagon 1 week ago
@Linsley121 2. (continued) the money that the lower class man pays into interest goes straight to the upperclass man with the 4% CD, therefore the rich is literally stealing money from the poor, only getting richer in the long run. And of coarse labor will be wipped out becuase of technology,MIT economist claim that within decades technology will destroy virtually all middle class jobs.So how will these billions of people get money for labor? we have to start rethinking what the use of(contiued
Linsley121 1 week ago
@Linsley121 3 (continued) human labor must be used towards and how that will completly dissolve the idea of money exchange. Its quite shocking to see how many people defend Capitalism and the US constitution not realizing how even the word capitialism or banking was never imprinted on the document anywhere. 90% of all crimes are monetary relatede one way or another, so right there you see that if we evolve from this primitive notion then we diminish nearly all crime.
Linsley121 1 week ago
@Linsley121 Well the current system in the US and elsewhere isn't ideal and should be changed but making interest on your bank deposits originally came from the fact that the bank would lend out some of your money at interest so that businesses could get capital up front that is otherwise just sitting around to undertake projects that great profit for them that they can then use to pay off the loan with and in return the bank gives you a cut from the interest repaid. No one steals anything.
Esoparagon 1 week ago
@Linsley121 The idea that technology will lead to unemployment is such an old fallacy I don't know how to even get it across that it's a load of nonsense. Do you really think there will be robots creating goods and services and people sitting around with no money to buy them? It's just absurd. The types of jobs change as the technology around them advances. The jobs people will be doing in the future, we can't even fathom at present. Neo-luddite paranoia is all it is.
Esoparagon 1 week ago
@Esoparagon how could this movement be a neo-luddite paranoia when this is probably the most techophilic utopia that i have ever heard.
kingmu1 1 week ago in playlist Jaques Fresco
@Esoparagon 1 how is it that technology will not diminish human labor?u have 0 proof to back that up. look at youtube for example, its basically free to watch this video over and over..yes u have to pay to power ur computer but thats only because we live in a monetary system. How is it so hard for u to understand that we follow an ancient tradition that is no longer necessary? its like as if an astronomer still believed the Earth was flat, thats impossible..because once you open up to new (cont)
Linsley121 6 days ago
@Esoparagon 2 (cont) infromation and research (technology) you must let go of ancients notions of the way things work. Capitalism is your religion, i could easily illustrate how technology has been created a negative affect towards human labor since the invention of the cotton gin..man use to build cars, now machines do it..man use to drive car but now computer can do that..man use to do surgery now computers can do that. All service sectors have felt the affect of technology producing (cont0
Linsley121 6 days ago
@Esoparagon 3 (cont) more efficient products and a faster rate, also it is cost efficient for a business to buy machines because machines arent people. Like i said economist for MIT have already announced how middle wage jobs will become obsolete in the near future. The monetary system will be forced to change as technology grows, look at history, from egalitarian societies, to horticultural societies, to industrialism to capitalism and ect...the change is inevitable, capitalism will (cont0
Linsley121 6 days ago
@Esoparagon have to change, the monetary system is useless, now it holds man back from achieving their highest levels of education, nutrition, and social well being. and if u deny then please explain to me how capitalism is helping the thousands of african boys dying each day? or the islams dying because the US military must invade their country to illegally claim resources on foreign land? or the thousands of poverty stricken cities in the US alone? The day will come when (cont)
Linsley121 6 days ago
@Esoparagon 5 (cont) the people of the world will realize that we live on the same planet, therefore trading with ourselves is useless...we must work together if we tend to have our species exsist for the long run. Go back and study the begining of libraries, hard headed capitalist back then use to believe it would be impossible for man to borrow books without stealing them, but obviously they were wrong. Libraries should be the focus of the way we use products. People forget (cont)
Linsley121 6 days ago
@Esoparagon 6 (cont) that when they use a product, its not that they need to keep it, its just that they need to use it...if you cant understand why on a phinite planet everyone can not have one of everything (which is the exact mentality produced by capitalism). Did you know that today americans consume twice as much as they did 70years ago? did you know that if the entire world lived like americans then we would need 4 Earths to subside for the resources? Capitalism worked through a (cont)
Linsley121 6 days ago
@Esoparagon 7 (cont) narrow percpective that the earth couldnt run out of anything, with todays knowledge we know thats not true. There is not one resource today that isnt being threatened by our cyclical consumption. Most defenders of capitalism say that man will begin to only work through advertising..now i want to ask you..is that honestly a healthy task we should be putting our kids towards? something that conditions other people to by their products? i think thats ridicolous to (cont)
Linsley121 6 days ago
@Linsley121 Please learn some causal-realist economics and economic history.
Esoparagon 5 days ago
@Esoparagon 1.how have i not pointed out casual or realistic economics or true economic history? Do u know the word economics means to not waste and to conserve, so when you look at capitalism you can see how it is the opposite, completly wasteful for the sake of money. If you dont think inequality is importanat then your not recongizing it. How is trying to provide the highest forms of education to everyone bad?..(cont)
Linsley121 4 days ago
@Esoparagon 2.(cont) how is providing healthy food and resources for people bad (whether or not they were born rich or poor)? how is allowing people to grow up in a safe, respectable, caring environment bad? how is making everyone equal for the sake of allowing them to achieve what humans are successful at a bad thing? you defend the dollar sign like a christian defends the cross.
Linsley121 4 days ago
@Esoparagon 3And how is planned obsolescence not important?capitalist always say "if its a crappy product then people wont buy it"..thats such a false statement i cant believe people say that. Havnt you ever researched how bad the nutrition is in the food we eat? From a fast food restraunt (McDonalds) to a grocery store, people still buy that food even though its bad, Havnt u been to a Walmart?those products are made as cheap as they can get away with. Havnt you owned a car?those are some (cont
Linsley121 4 days ago
Comment removed
Linsley121 4 days ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@Esoparagon 4 (cont) of the most inefficeint machines we build to this day. and if you still dont agree that planned obsolescence is not bad or does not go far in the free market, then i can easily name a million other examples (literally) and i bet you wont recongnise one of them for the sake of your religion. So with that said you begin to realize how much waste we create. even plastic is completly unecessary to still use. The fact that you dont think planned obsolescence is important (cont)
Linsley121 4 days ago
@Esoparagon 5(cont) proves my point on how hard it is for defenders of our current economic system donot recognize that we live on a phinite planet. we do not have unlimited resources here, but the concept of the amount of money can expand for an infinity.you have yet to show me any proof to your opinions, becuz you cant find any, and i dont mean by googling it, i mean actually researching. I can break down capitalism as easily as it is to break down christianity and all of there false claims.
Linsley121 4 days ago
Comment removed
Linsley121 4 days ago
@Esoparagon to economize means to not waste. so we can go as far as call our economy an anti-economy because we are not economizing
Linsley121 4 days ago
@Linsley121 Exactly, because economy actually means house hold management.
muffinspuffinsEE 4 days ago
@muffinspuffinsEE yes but to economize and economy have to different definitions in a common dictionary.
Linsley121 4 days ago
@Linsley121 As the other guy said, economize, economics and economy have to different definitions. Economics analyzes the production, distribution, and consumption of goods and services. You're muddling up concepts and definitions.
Esoparagon 3 days ago
@Esoparagon 8 (cont) turn generations of humans into slaves working day in and day out to promote a product for the sake of money (something that isnt physically tangible in the first place). The idea that equality is bad came from the conditioning of the US during the rise of communism (which isnt actually communism) the Soviets, china, cuba and so on were all dictatorships labeled as communism just to make it look bad. If u actually studied the logics and orgins of communism then you (cont)
Linsley121 4 days ago
@Esoparagon 9 (cont) would realize that its impossible for it to work through a monetary system because money is automatically unequal. if you went back to the 1600's and tried to explain to rich white protastants that in the future slavery will change and a black man would have just as much rights as a white man, they would laugh at u and say that impossible.(cont)
Linsley121 4 days ago
@Esoparagon 10 (cont) now thats just me outlining an analogy of how im telling you that money wont need to exsist, but you laugh at me and say thats impossible...see your not understanding how the human species is prone to change how it conducts itself over time and with further knowledge. The only reason most people defend capitalism is because the level of conditioning they have experienced, they dont know anything else, so y would then doubt it
Linsley121 4 days ago
@Linsley121 I do recognize inequality but I don't think it's important. We are born unequal. Get over it. Inequality isn't bad. Trying to make everyone equal is. Planned obsolescence isn't important. If a business does it, they will either go out of business as people go to a more reliable producer or they will not care enough because it's cheap enough for them not to care. Either way it doesn't matter.
Esoparagon 1 week ago
@Esoparagon 1. Defenders of the capitalistic notion hardly recognize things such as "planned obsolesence", "structural classism", or even "inequality"...there notions or suggestions hardly even leave the money sequences. What proof do u have that shows wealth and prosperity has been increasing? how is it that an upper classman putting a million$ on a 4%cd at their bank(essentially making free money with no external output) helps the lower class man borrowing money at interest,because(continued
Linsley121 1 week ago
cameraman u could use some more schoooooooling
bfine123 1 month ago
Thank you
MsOksana1979 1 month ago
this is gold
immortal6699 1 month ago
hey. please try to enable the stranscribed subtitles again. youtube sometimes tells you that "the auto transcription failed". but when you try again it succeeds. please try.
imslicc 1 month ago
@imslicc It doesn't let me.
jacquefresco 1 month ago
what a FIND!!!!!
meadowsirl 1 month ago
this man's words will stand the test of time..
thedarkcow64 1 month ago 4
Great lecture, I appreciate how this one seems particularly well delivered in comparison to later ones that seem more chaotic, although the content is equally useful. Very nice.
gabssnake 1 month ago 3
Excellent.
Das0s 1 month ago
Absolutely amazing. Thank you for sharing. - Martin
JacqueFrescoTVP 1 month ago
This man is a genius
flassk7 2 months ago 21
what he said in 48:13 was genius and so well put....
alternativeknowledge 2 months ago
This was incredible
Hoady101 2 months ago in playlist Uploaded videos 16
@24:18 "OH I just LOOVE that hat"
PlatoTheForms 2 months ago
A big centrifue, thy put a human being in it and they whirl it around, they say "how are you doing?" lmao
PlatoTheForms 2 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
I wish my body had a water table regulator to monitor the level of water inside...WOW!
packleader1215 2 months ago
I wish my body had a water table regulator to monitor the level of water inside.....WOW!
packleader1215 2 months ago
I am sorry, but i dont like to see mr Fresco making drawings one over another.. i only can understand that there is no organization.. By the way, i really like mr Fresco. A LOT! :)
johnyboy6405 2 months ago
Jacque Fresco is a wonderful human being and to say he is a genius is to comment on the sky being blue..it's obvious and equally unimportant. The research and the message is undeniably true and we should focus on the research and these lessons, not idolize Fresco as that totally misses the point. Over the years I have scrutinized his work and looked at it from many angles...humanity will evolve into a type 1 society (re:Michio Kaku), but only if we implement the RBE...but this is 100 years away
thewestcoasttruth 2 months ago 4
@thewestcoasttruth
Id say by the end of this century we should see us being type 1 civilization if all goes well.
TheNotoriousJesus 2 months ago in playlist Uploaded videos 3
I like the way he thinks
CylenthVision 2 months ago
If i had to describe Jacques in one word (if that is even possible) that word would be "decrapifier".
crashmer 3 months ago 2
Great stuff.... he would not like this, but i call him a genius :)
Asimovsfuture 3 months ago
He was right, it DID change my life
MrHectorMaximus 3 months ago
Comment removed
MrHectorMaximus 3 months ago
Your ideas and insights for humankinds future is that of a pure genius.. Thankyou for waking me up from this nightmare world that i live in today and giving me hope for a better and beautiful future.
TheErickent 3 months ago 5
Jacque, I promise that i will continue with your dream any way I can. I believe in you and strangley understand you no matter how dificult of a topic you bring up. Your awareness is so precise and makes 100% perfect sense. You are that man dancing behind the flickering light and we will all become that highly advanced camera!
TheErickent 3 months ago
@TheErickent respect my friend!!!
kornboy3 3 months ago
Has Jacque Fresco ever said anything about cryogenics and his thoughts about it?
Ken11091990 3 months ago
@Ken11091990 Yes. He believes that if someone were preserved for too long and then reintroduced to the world, they would have a very difficult time coping with the world around them. Daily life and the values of people would be so different.
jacquefresco 3 months ago 15
@jacquefresco lol like fry from futurama..
WhenYourStrange93 1 month ago
@Ken11091990 also he says they'd just bring back old rotten values from price system days.
thevenusprojectmedia 3 months ago
@Ken11091990 Cryonics not cryongenics if you are talking about human cryopreservation.
He has, I have asked him this and his response was that he does not think that future civilizations will want to bring people back as it is hard enough trying to change the values of someone with out bringing them and their relatives back with old values. I meant my question to ask him if he thinks that the forward thinking nature of the cryopreserved meant future people would have empathy,but havent asked yet
Slayer2kable 3 months ago
Not immortal... At some point he has to die so you will have to think for yourself!!!
But my guess is that he wouldnt want to be immortal either.
BlackS3th 3 months ago
@jacquefresco
Oh, makes sense. Thanks for the reply.
95ekim 3 months ago
Does Jacque Fresco have any books out?
aprox23 3 months ago 5
@aprox23 Certainly. "The Best That Money Can't Buy" is best to read. However if you can't afford to buy it, you can get the ebook "Designing the Future" for free. His first book, "Looking Forward" has been converted to ebook and can also be found for free. That is all that is available online right now. Just search those titles. You'll find something.
jacquefresco 3 months ago 16
@jacquefresco Looking Forward is one of the most mind blowing books that I've ever read.
stjamal11 2 months ago
@aprox23 Yep, "The Best That Money Can't Buy" is an awesome book. Worth its weight in gold!
lordlazerwolf 3 months ago
@lordlazerwolf Oh, and you can order it at The Venus Project web site.
lordlazerwolf 3 months ago
@aprox23 yes The venus project. google it
andrewdeese 2 months ago
@IanDryden1981 Well said.
jacquefresco 3 months ago
Tic, toc, tic, toc, every passing second brings us closer to the end of the monetary system and the beginning of a better future for humanity... :D
VisionsOfTheNobody 3 months ago
@diegomur You fucking piece of shit. Go and die you worthless cum stain. Jacque and Roxanne have both worked tirelessly in this direction for the betterment of humankind for no monetary gains. They have put in many of their years and money in planning, designing and constructing elements of this vision without outside support. How about you get off Alex Jones' dick? He enjoys profiting from cunts like you who hook, line and sinker propaganda while you watch his advertisements. Reptilian fuckers.
IAM18YEARSOLDANDOVER 3 months ago
@IAM18YEARSOLDANDOVER I don't Jaque would approve of this comment.
sfgox10 3 months ago
una TRADUCCION al ESPAÑOL por favor! :'(
we (sudamerica) don`t speak english...
washanwear 3 months ago
In my understanding, at that time he didn't have the idea of ending the monetary system.
95ekim 3 months ago
@95ekim as he says "gradually accumulating information, bits and bits" So yeah now he knows more about it,.
HajtomY 3 months ago
@95ekim Fresco has always known the need to remove the monetary system. Here he is speaking at Nichols College which is a far right wing conservative pro free-market university. Speaking about the removal of the monetary system might have been too offensive for such people, and might have turned them off right away.
jacquefresco 3 months ago 4
@95ekim Yeah, Larry King interview from 1974 makes this clear.
aTrulyPowerfulSpirit 3 months ago
probably the best lecture ive seen of his - hes got hearing problems now and hes alittle slower - still sharp though - but more so here at i guess 81 ish
MrIzzyDizzy 3 months ago