Why the Moon Hoax makes no sense : Part 2

[yaluobud]

NASA still has an Apollo mission promotions department to keep the pathetic 'Lie' alive. It is a given it was all faked, yet some patriotic morons just can't accept that they had been lied to and that the US government could do such a thing.

Oh Machiavellian propaganda, how deceitful thou art!

[williamrobinsonb]

the Russian monkeys and astronauts got fried by radiation documented fact!!!!!

and the space shuttle got to close to the van allin belts the lone astronaut feared for his life and hid behind the led battery's ordered by nassa to hide there.

funny how the moon shot went threw then during a solar storm with no radiation affects high. only an intellectual idiot could say we went to the moon back then or an indoctrinated fool.

[mddawson1]

@williamrobinsonb James Van Allen (the person who discovered these) has public stated that people can travel safely through them. How about you do a bit of research first rather than confirming that you are a fool?

[lapmarty]

@williamrobinsonb exactly like other have answer the van belt thing is overrule, james van allen have stated like the comment below says, to have got enought radiation to fried the astronaut would have had to be in the direct path of a solar flare and they are rare, and to get in the path you have to be really unlucky cause the space is so vast,

how many sateliute have been lost in the last decade?? not much because of radiation burst

[astonbrock]

@williamrobinsonb An intellectual idiot? An interesting opinion from someone who can't spell 'Van Allen', 'lead', 'Nasa', 'effects', 'through', 'batteries'...

[GlowWorm1962]

For the proof Apollo was real, that hoaxtards don't want you to see: watch?v=Dwib6nve_0k

[Serpico261]

i can refute all conspiracy arguments with very very simple physical arguemnts...

the funny thing is that most of the people regard the moon pictures as hoax evidences...this photos become a symbol for a huge conspiracy...

thats so sad...actually this photos proof the truth of this mission

by the way..this is the worst power point presentation in history...i mean hes right but pp is so bad

[karmaverick]

The best proof that it isnt a hoax wud be for another country to take pics of the usa landing site if there is one and show it to the world.Those who believe completely that the moon landing is real are rite up there with the "conspiracy theorists".None of them have been to the moon, almost none work for NASA,those who do work, it's not like anyone wud tell them shit, probably unless ur high ranked.They have been conditioned and are being fed the facts just as the "theorists".

[mddawson1]

Unfortunately all the current probes sent to the moon (Japanese, Chinese & Indian) are not fitted with cameras that can pick up the Apollo landers (eg: Google Kaguya image gallery). Anyway it wouldn't matter to the deniers, they would just claim the new photos were part of the cover-up. The will study the photos looking for anomilies & because they know FA about photography, will claim that the slight faults (that are common to all photos) they find are proof the photos are fake.

[newdad1107]

I think the only way to prove it to them is to give the most academically qualified theorist a ride, with whomever goes next (even if its just laps around the moon). As if bouncing lasers off of man made retroreflectors on the moon wasnt proof enough.

[dantheman1507]

tell you what... if the Japanese find apollo 11, I will believe the americans went on the moon.

Until then, I'm not trusting the US even for a microsec.

[AutoYorn1]

Ive always been very suspicious of the Moon Landings based on pure Logic, common sense and rational objective critical thinking.

After hearing NASAs side of the story and the Hoaxers Opinions, i cide with the Hoaxers as having the Truth.

Most people speak of the Moon Landings as 'no big deal, it happened, just a typical usual space mission etc' NEVER thinking about the immense complexity and sophistication it would take to Land men and have them return safely with such precision

[mddawson1]

Pity you didnt apply logic to your belief. Yes it was immensely complex & NASA never denied that. Just because talk like its no big deal isnt proof it didn't happen. What you have to consider is how much more trouble it would be to create a hoax that would fool the 1000s involved in the several countries involved. The transmissions were picked up in Australia. The USSR were monitoring transmissions from the moon, there was nowhere else they could come from. They would immediately exposed a hoax.

[karmaverick]

Simple question again?Y hasnt Russia sent anyone to the moon and y has it sat back and taken the insult?

[mddawson1]

Once the US beat them there (to beat the commie bastards) the USSRs political incentive (to beat the imperialist dogs) was gone. You obviously do not understand the political nature of the times & that the USSR was monitoring the moon landings as closely as NASA. Just think about it - if the transmission had come from anywhere other than the moon it would have been immediately obvious. The USSR scientists would have noticed their antenna were pointed in the wrong direction.

[yaluobud]

@mddawson1

In 1970 I talked to one of the tracking dish operators at NASA's Honeysuckle Creek Tracking Station (the first place to receive images) who believed he was following the signals from the moon and moving the dish to get best reception as Earth rotated. When he finished his shift and went outside and looked up, the dish wasn't even pointing at the moon, he had been tracking a communications satellite all along. Global TV coverage was achieved in 1967 & NASA used that system to fool us.

[mddawson1]

@yaluobud - is this the best BS you can come up with??? What was his name? You don't know because you are lying. Go to honeysucklecreek dotnet to read the truth.

[yaluobud]

@mddawson1

It is not BS, I was there and it was not a lie. No I do not know his name but he was quite amazed by the situation why the dish wasn't pointing towards the moon. Take it or leave it!

[mddawson1]

@yaluobud - If you don't know who he was then there is no way you can confirm his story. Check out that website I mentioned as it is run by the people who were actually working there at the time, not some anonymous person you claimed to have talked to.

[crazyanimeguy]

For those people who thinks we landed the moon at least twice, and 4 of them were faked. Why 4 of them are hoax and 2 of them real??

[ThirstyonThursday]

Great video.

haha LOL at alot of these comments, moon hoax/9-11/haarp videos really bring out the psychopaths.

Check out dbootsthediva for the average intellectual capacity of these people.

[legioninhell]

This man insane but after all he is from worthless land down under.

They just have penis I mean rocket envy because they can't get it up. A rocket that is.

Legion

[RoadRunnerLaser]

Hey, come on legioninhell... Greenmagoos might be a worthless individual but please don't taint all Aussies with that slur...

The Aussies were instrumental in the Apollo missions especially in tracking and relaying TV pictures. Maybe they didn't launch any of their own guys to the moon but they helped those who did and earned their place in history.

[snoberts]

While I'm still able to post here can anyone let me know what other names greenmagoos goes by. He's responsible for at least half of these moronic hoax sites and I suspect he has made even more under other names. It is clear he is a very disturbed individual and if he has been spending all his time creating these videos I'm sure it must be against his doctor's wishes. If you have family GM, think of what this paranoid obsession is doing to them and seek help.

[snoberts]

Hi Greenmagoos and other reason-blockers. The dust kicked up by the rover is spread through an arc of about 45 degrees from horizontal, limited by the dust guard on the wheel. At 8 mph (the typical cruising speed of the rover) this means a maximum height of 1.97 metres, entirely consistent with the moon footage. Of course not all the particles come off the wheels at the same speed or the same elevation so it spreads in wave-like patterns as each particle follows its perfect parabolic arc.

[horror11]

@SpreadingtheMuse

you are a physicist you state.

how is it possible for moondust to remain in midair when the rover droves over the surface?

where is the perfect parabolic arch of an atmosphereless moon?

[degrangier]

If you ever want to proof you have on the moon, it's very simple. You go to the moon with an Hasselblad camera, loaded with 1600 asa film. You put it in pause some minutes in direction of the sky, and due to absence of atmosphere you make beautifull high resolution photos of the sky. Whith this photo, an astronomer will tell you exactly where you where and at what time.

We are desesperately seeking only one photo of the sky in all the Apollo program.

End of the story.

[RoadRunnerLaser]

@Degrangier:

"We are desesperately seeking only one photo of the sky in all the Apollo program."

There's plenty of them. Research the Lunar Observatory, delivered and operated by Apollo astronauts.

[degrangier]

So tell me where I could see these photos?

If there is plenty of them, give me some links to them.

[RoadRunnerLaser]

watch?v=Z1aixi_Sj24

Try that for size. YT comments isn't an easy place to post complex links. That should start you off in the right direction.

If I recall correctly, the lunar observatory operated by Apollo 16 took around 170 photos.

[degrangier]

The doubt is installed now in my mind. These specific photos setup does not proof something for me. I do not ask for high technologic photos, but simple photos taken by the astronauts with hasselbad cameras. Look, there is no atmosphere. If you only shoot the sky, you definitely get wonderfull sky photos. There is no reflexion from the moon surface in the vacuum. The sky from the moon, must be an unforgetable experience, that you surely want at least remember by a photo.

[RoadRunnerLaser]

If someone showed you a photo of the starry sky and told you that it was taken from the moon, would you say "Oh... But I need to see something in the foreground like an astronaut or the LEM to prove this was on the moon..."

How would an astronaut photograph the lunar sky ? He'd have to lie on his back very still ! The camera was mounted to his chest !

Even on Earth, we need long exposure photography. Those cameras were not configured for taking stellar photography.

[RoadRunnerLaser]

You said:

"Whith this photo, an astronomer will tell you exactly where you where and at what time.

We are desesperately seeking only one photo of the sky in all the Apollo program.

End of the story. "

Someone did exactly that with the photo from the Lunar Observatory and gave you the very proof you asked for and now you complain.

As you said, the doubt is installed in your mind. Permanently! You will not allow anything to remove it because you WANT to believe in nonsense.

End of story!

[degrangier]

I am willing to get something real. Even on the earth, with atmosphere, when the sun is low you can see planets and stars of big magnitude, in the day light. You do not need to have a long exposition. All the films are stored and photos seen in chronological order. One unique photo would be a clue. This fact is not determinant, there is an ocean of doubts and impossible videos.(I don't need to convince you!. I wait for the LRO hiRes feed videos, and what will unleash Nasa.

[RoadRunnerLaser]

There's a big difference between the sensitivity of our eyes and the useful range of photographic film. I repeat, the camera was mounted to the chest of the astronaut. How is he going to point it up at the sky and make a long enough exposure to capture stars ?

They took equipment specifically to record the stars, they had no need to make astronauts lie in the dust to take them.

You simply don't want to accept what you demanded because it destroys the basis for your delusions.

[degrangier]

I do not want to make you change your mind. You simply did'nt found the right arguments. There is a lot of photos that have been said mostly impossible to make with the camera on the chest. I think it is really not believable that stars are not visible, at least one time, even blurred by lack of stability. This not determinant anyway. This is not a major issue anyway. It's just one thing in a bunch of doubtfull facts.

[RoadRunnerLaser]

No. I didn't find the arguments convincing.

There's a lot of photos which have been said to...???? Pah !!

You asked for photos. I showed you a video containing those photos against a star-map, as you requested and now you waffle on about more nutjob claims...

SEMMELWEIS REFLEX - Do you know what that is ?

[degrangier]

Yes, you'r really the one exemple. Any well technically aware people only rely on reproductable and verifiable assertion. A lot of photos and video are obviously faked. You can write wat you want, you have no chance against the evidence. Stay in your world.

The need to be right is a mark of vulgar spirit.

[RoadRunnerLaser]

"The need to be right is a mark of vulgar spirit."

That's just hogwash created by someone incapable of being right.

Being right is somewhat essential when it comes to life.

"Is this activity going to kill me ?"

"Is that a predator?"

"Is this nutritious or toxic?"

Is the need to survive the mark of a vulgar spirit too ?

I provided you with exactly what you asked for and you cry "Fake" because to do otherwise would be to admit to living a fantasy. Psychoceramics 101.

[degrangier]

What you say is a confirmation of what I told you.

[RoadRunnerLaser]

I suggest that you come back and talk to me when you've outgrown the schoolyard mentality.

I have a tendancy to ridicule the ridiculous and as you've been shown what you asked for and have been unable to debate your position, to continue in your ludicrous behaviour is to willingly expose yourself to well-deserved ridicule.

Subtitles for the hard-of-thinking:

Now would be a good time for you to STFU.

[degrangier]

You better talk to your psychanalist. And not abuse of neuroleptics.

Waff! Waff!

[keflar5]

speak up you mumbling little bitch, your right tho mate

[EGMAG]

I already have a college education,<<

Good for you! Did you do the hazing or get hazed quite a bit; because your fucked up on something!

[SpreadingtheMuse]

So says the fruitcake with his laundry list of conspiracy cliches that he KNOWS to be true!

911? Found the dumbest theory you could find and fell for it.

Apollo? Found the dumbest theory you could find and fell for it.

Iraq? If there's a dumb theory, I'll bet you believe it. ;)

This is how college helps Eg. You learn how not to base your emotional balance on transparently stupid ideas, and have a life other than your collection of quack pages.

[EGMAG]

I hope this guy don't get paid for this bullshit-cover-up-crap!

[SpreadingtheMuse]

But why is it that the debunkers always have more facts and sound smarter than people like you?

[EGMAG]

SpreadingtheMuse

smarter <<

They have much more to hide and are blinded by false bravado and insecure nationalism!

[SpreadingtheMuse]

Sounds like you're believing your own propaganda. ;)

If or when you can produce a moon kook who actually has a college education, I'd be happy to talk to them. ;)

Since I already have one, I can guarantee my bravado is anything but "false," but I cant speak for you. ;)

[jamesdt1980]

'facts'? it's called conspiracy 'theory'.

[SpreadingtheMuse]

HA! You're right of course, but dont tell that to any of the fruitloops here, they'd get their feelings hurt.

[allymetoo]

Funny, how he walks around his windows task bar for an hour.

Seems, he doesn't even know how to use his PowerPoint App.

Skeptics Inc.

Funny Crap, really.

[darthrubikscubevader]

i think it's funny (yet odd) that every comment posted is of huge length compared to other videos on youtube. but anyway, what i was going to say is, before i watched this video, i didn't place any credence whatsoever on the concept that the moon landing could ever have been faked. but now that i have seen this, i'm not so sure...

[mia624]

I type 120 words per minute too, so it didn't take me a half hour, or even 5 minutes, to type and send you those messages. But thanks for your concern though. I will however, agree with you that we (U.S.A.) did in FACT land on the Moon! The flag is waveing in the wind because the Moon has a very thin atmosphere and even some cloud cover. The government DID however, add faked footage to the REAL Armstrong landing though....

[mia624]

And why are you putting up messages that start with "Yes folks"? What folks? You have NO AUDIENCE to address! And I'm delusional?! Shea bra! Suppose you're one of those idiots that believe the Earth rotates around the Sun because of the Rousch Field huh? LOL, If you had a brain-cell, it would die of loneliness....FOOL....

[mia624]

And by the way, I NEVER said Sitchin was 100% or even 75% right, you obviously forget about L.A. Waddle, Dr. Arthur David Horn, Maurice Ewing, Professor S.A. Jordan, Alex Christopher, William Bramley, Brian Desborough, and THE BRITISH MUSEUMS'S OWN CURATORS AND INFORMATION!

[mia624]

I see you're still on here! Jeez man, you either need to move out of your mom's basement or get some pussy cause your CONSTANT messaging ALL THE TIME makes it so apparent that you have absolutely NO SOCIAL LIFE what-so-ever, it's pretty pathetic.

[msdnvp]

Peter Barrett of the Canberra Skeptics, do you seek attention ? these people that say the moon hoax makes no sence are really crazy more then those who believe usa landed on the moon seriously now ! explain the moving flag. the shadows etc to much.

[fonna]

Alrighty then. We can take pictures, (pretty good ones, too) of Mars 35 million miles away. How come we cannot take pictures of the moon's surface via Hubble telescope and get those detailed shots of the flag? Just wondering.

That would be conclusive evidence, wouldn't it?

[mddawson1]

Because Hubble can only resolve objects 10 metres or larger at the moons distance. The Apollo lander bases are 9m diameter so would be smaller than 1 pixel in a Hubble photo. I don't know about the recent Japanese satellite sent to the moon but the US will send 1 able to photograph Apollo sites next year.

[TheCruizer]

Yes mddowson1, but then, we have the next conspiracy! They will say, that the new NASA-pics are also faked and the Japs are paid from NASA to fake their pics too. It is like figthing against windmills... ;-)

[whitiedave]

good point and so far nothing!!!

[GavinPiano]

Hubble can't even resolve that much. I worked it out at roughly 4 times to small to resolve to one pixel for the Lunar bases.

[tim1990nissan]

moon landing is fake end of story

[mddawson1]

How would you know? You were not even alive at the time.

[Peltris]

Here's a plan Take 10 people who don't belive in the moon landings and send them to the moon. let them take as many cameras as they want. this would prove once and for all that America went to the moon. anyone after that who would call the second set of moon landings fake would just be moronic and infantile.

[mddawson1]

Can we leave the deniers up there?

[mia624]

Go ahead and answer to that because I'm never coming back to see this FAKE, RIDICULOUS video again! Have fun being LIED to for the rest of your PATHETIC, MEANINGLESS LIFE! 2 words to describe sheeple like yourself, FOOLISH PRIDE....

[mddawson1]

Yes folks, mia624 represents exactly the type of people who believe in conspiracy theories. They lack basic reasoning skills & combined with paranoid delusions believe in all sorts of nonsense. Take your lithium dude.

[mia624]

I DONE with your IGNORANT ass! You're not worth one more minute of my time because you are a MORON. You CLEARLY have either FEAR ISSUES that you can't face or are a stupid skeptic that either LIKES to ARGUE and thinks he knows everything or has an INFERIORITY COMPLEX and needs to try to prove himself to other people by debating ALL THE TIME! You are now a FART IN THE WIND TO ME!

[mddawson1]

Thats funny because it must have taken you at least a half hour to write those 2 retarded private messages you sent me.

[mddawson1]

"Clearly, Sitchin is a smart man. He weaves a complicated tale from the bits & pieces of evidence that survive from ancient Sumeria to the present day. Just as clearly, Sitchin is capable of academic transgressions (fracturing quotes, ignoring dissenting facts), theft of intellectual property (those tables he copied) & flights of intellectual fancy (the whole book, really).

[mddawson1]

Worst of all, he is almost utterly innocent of astronomy & other assorted fields of modern science. In the end, he's just another nut making a living selling books that treat folks to a tale they want to believe in." Rob Hafernik

[mddawson1]

"Instead of quoting standard translations for Biblical verses, Sitchin makes up his own translations, based on his interpretation of 'the parallel Sumerian and Akkadian texts/tales'. Unfortunately, he is using those verses to support his interpretation of those texts." Rob Hafernik

[mddawson1]

"[Sitchin] demonstrates a consistent lack of appreciation of even some of the most basic fundamentals of Sumerian & Akkadian grammar, even to the extent of regularly failing to distinguish between the 2 entirely different languages, & mixing words from each in interpreting the syllables of longer compound words." This mixing of languages allows Sitchin to make amazing "discoveries." Sumerian linguist (who requested anonymity to avoid the onslaught of hate-mail from ancient astronaut believers)

[mddawson1]

"Sitchin's claim to fame is announcing that he alone correctly reads ancient Sumerian clay tablets. All other scholars have misread these tablets which, according to Sitchin, reveal that gods from another planet (Niburu, which orbits our Sun every 3,600 years) arrived on Earth some 450,000 years ago & created humans by some genetic engineering with female apes." Skeptics Dictionary

[mia624]

Except for saying this one more time- They DID NOT personify star constellations into mythological characters! This is REALLY what tells me that you HAVE NO IDEA WHAT YOU'RE TALKING ABOUT and that you are just shooting you mouth off before doing ANY research at all because of the FACT that you have PRE-CONCIEVED BELIEFS of what you WANT to be true!

[mddawson1]

The only person here with pre-concieved beliefs is you. You have fallen hook line & sinker for Sitchins lies. I have no doubt you won't look at the website SitchinIsWrong dot com because it will shatter your delusions.

[mia624]

I'm NOT taking this conversation any further UNTIL I get ALL of my questions ANSWERED! Until then, I'M DONE....

[mddawson1]

I have answered all your questions Sitchin is a fraud & a liar & you are a fool for believing in him.

[mia624]

And by the way, Von Daniken DID NOT make ANYTHING up! Like Sitchin, just because he was wrong on a few things DOES NOT give you the right or the LOGIC to discredit EVERYTHING he and Sitchin HAVE found and PROVEN! You've been reading too many skeptic magazines and websites! I get the feeling that you're a christian or a religious person that has FEAR issues....

[mddawson1]

I am an atheist. I think it would be wonderful to contact intelligent alien life but I am not foolish enough to believe a fraud like Sitchin whose only interest is to rip-off people like you.

[mia624]

Well you believe everything nasa says without going into space to check for yourself so why don't you apply your "reasoning" to the Sumerian culture?

[mddawson1]

I don't believe third rate scholars who make up stuff so they can sell their stupid ideas to retards.

[mia624]

"One obvious answer to all your questions is that just like Von Daniken, Zecharia Sitchin made it all up - after all I cannot read ancient Sumerian to check if he is lying."

[mia624]

spell check- forth

[mia624]

Plus, Sitchin IS wrong on a few of his translations but that doesn't give IGNORANT people the right to shrug off and ridicule a WHOLE CIVILIZATION! Especially when it's the 1st one that has sprug for HUNDREDS of methods and beliefs that we still hold and practice today!

[mia624]

mddawson1, you have STILL FAILED to answer ANY of my questions. And that total CRAP about Sitchin " making it all up" is absolutely RIDICULOUS! EVERY SINGLE Sumerologist on the planet have ALL agreed on the MAIN translations and themes of the Sumerian Tablets! Plus, I CAN read SOME Sumerian and early Egyptian, since I've taken courses on it in College so your "bible/christian clinging", fear based ideas aren't grounded in FACTS or reality....

[mddawson1]

Everyone agrees with Sitchin? I think not: SitchinIsWrong dot com

[mddawson1]

NASA will be sending a satellite next year that will photograph the entire moon. Its resolution will be high enough to photograph the Apollo sites. The new spacecraft is meant to be ready by 2010. The lunar base is expected to be permanently staffed by 2024.

[quaheedus]

I hope you are right about the resolution of the photos..but the CT'S will still say they are fake,or that NASA just shot objects to the moon such as the LEM base,lunar rover etc and that man still did not land on the moon despite all the evidence ..its just ridiculous and the only thing more frightening than the the way that these conpiracist think is the fact that they can vote.

[mddawson1]

I always thought the problem with CTs was they can't think.

[quaheedus]

No.its not the fact that they cant think that bothers me...its the fact that they can vote and possibly affect my life..otherwise let them be stupid.

[mia624]

Those were just a few of the AMAZING "unanswerable questions" (unless you accept DIRECT E.T. INTERVENTION) that the Sumerians left us! You answer ALL of the questions I posed to you and the rest of the RETARDED skeptical society and PRESENT EVIDENCE and/or SOURCES of that EVIDENCE to back up your claims and maybe, just MAYBE I'll then have alittle bit of REPECT for you! Until that time, you and the rest of the skeptics are ALL just what I KNOW you are...SHEEP...or rather, SHEEPLE!

[mddawson1]

One obvious answer to all your questions is that just like Von Daniken, Zecharia Sitchin made it all up - after all I cannot read ancient Sumerian to check if he is lying.

[mddawson1]

Google zecharia Sitchin bad astronomer or the website sitchiniswrong(dot)com for why its Sitchin is full of BS.

[mia624]

And how did Homo-neanderthalus evolve into Cro-magnon man/Homo-sapien in a matter of less than 2 centuries time?!!! How were they able to take BILLIONS of years of evolution and alter and SPEED IT UP to where they changed their physical form in less than a couple hundred years and increase their brain capacity by almost 20%?!!! HOW, HOW, HOW!!!

[mddawson1]

Neanderthals didn't evolve, they died out.

[mia624]

How did they invent the Sexagesmal number system that to this very day has STILL NOT been bettered, advanced, or replaced because of it's AMAZING PERFECTION that even Mathmaticians DROOL OVER and are completely stumped about how a "stone-age" culture could, in a period of 70-125 years, advance from hunter gatherers/ Nomadic tribes into a full-blown ADVANCED society even by TODAY'S STANDARDS?

[mddawson1]

It doesn't take a whole culture to come up with advanced ideas, it is usually a few individuals whose ideas are adopted by the society. Its not that unusual.

[mia624]

How were they able to accurately predict and list small, medium, and large Sun cycles that started THOUSANDS of years BEFORE their civilization and ended thousands of years AFTER they fell away? How did they know EXACTLY what elements that our (new) Moon harbors!

[mia624]

How did they know that Neptune and Uranus are BOTH covered by water and call them "the blue-green twins" without useing VERY powerful telescopes? Even with telescopes, the color of those 2 planets CANNOT be determined nor can it be determined that they're BOTH covered by water unless with the aid of SATALITES/cameras!

[mia624]

And how did they know how many planets our solar system had/has? How were they able to 100% accurately list how many moons that each of our solar system's planets had orbiting around them and which of those moons had water, BY NAME and description?!

[mia624]

And most importantly, how did the Sumerians know about D.N.A.'s existance at all, genetic manipulation, the FACT that there are 22 gene sequences that are found in Human D.N.A., and what the MICROSCOPIC D.N.A. Molecule (the double-helix spiral/Cadeucus symbol) looked like under the microscope?

[mia624]

Thirdly, Zecharia Sitchin IS NOT the only Sumerologist that knows how to translate Sumerian Cuneiform. There are a whole list of other HIGHLY RESPECTED Sumerologists that ALL, I repeat, ALL have said the EXACT SAME BASIC THINGS of the Sumerians and their writtings! Dr. David Horn, Alan Walton, and William Bramley are just a few of the many of them!

[mia624]

Secondly, they DID NOT personify star constellations into mythological characters! This is REALLY what tells me that you HAVE NO IDEA WHAT YOU'RE TALKING ABOUT and that you are just shooting you mouth off before doing ANY research at all because of the FACT that you have PRE-CONCIEVED BELIEFS of what you WANT to be true!

[mia624]

First off, the Sumerians CLEARLY state in WAY MORE than acouple of their tablets that the ANUNNAKI "were flesh and blood beings" and that "they PHYSICALLY descended to Earth and TAUGHT man ALL of the different attributes of civilization"!

[mia624]

mddawson1, you OBVIOUSLY have done ZERO research on the Sumerian civilization! What you said about Sitchin is 100% WRONG! "His whole argument is based on flawed logic. The Sumerians were interested in stars & attributed gods to them - then he jumps to the conclusion aliens."

[bohemiangrove]

there is only one good reason to think that they acctually went to the moon and that is because the Summerian tablets say it's all ready possible. They are either hiding something from us, which they can't tell or they infact didn't went to the moon

[mddawson1]

What do Summerian tablets have to do with it?

[bohemiangrove]

according to some scientist, they believe space traveling has been done many times in the past. That's what they read from the tablets. Either we don't know how to get to the moon or they are not telling us the truth.

[mddawson1]

Who is this scientist? He sounds retarded. No ancient cultures had the technology to fly let alone go to the moon. We knew how to get to the moon in the early 20th cent & had the technology by the 1960s - build a powerful rocket, stick an airtight capsule on it, point it at the moon then fire. The Sumarian tablets are just BS.

[bohemiangrove]

Yes you are right, we are alone in this universe. Have a nice day

[mddawson1]

You say Sumarien tablets, a scientist - both vague references that are impossible to follow up on. If you want your arguments to be taken seriously then provide some info.

[mddawson1]

I checked your video & I assume you are talking about Zecharia Sitchin. His whole argument is based on flawed logic. The Sumerians were interested in stars & attributed gods to them - then he jumps to the conclusion aliens. He also thinks we are alien/human hybreds. How could alien DNA evolving in an alien environment be compatible with human DNA? We cannot reproduce with our closest relatives (chimps) let alone an alien. Why choose this one retarded "scientist" over all the other sane ones?

[mddawson1]

Now to the assumption that I think we are alone in the universe. I believe we are not alone & that there is life on other planets. I have no evidence to back this up other than the life on Earth. That said, the chances of intelligent life is much more unlikely although not impossible. If there was intelligent life the chances that they have visited us is nil given the timeframes for the evolution of intelligent life & the distances required to get here.

[usabr2]

Poor apresentation and in text, off course they don't want show they fake pictures...

[igrecman]

Children at school in Russia and many other countries are thought that the moon landings never happend.

[mddawson1]

They were also taught that Communism was the greatest thing since sliced bread - this does not make the hoax true.

[TreeLaufe]

What a lazy-ass. Why can't he do a powerpoint presentation instead of just shoving a word document up there?

[dragonofthesea]

they landed on the moon it's sad to think people are still saying it's a hoaz

[dharmamark]

Your ring finger goes on the X, not the little finger on the Z. Don't people proofread their comments, or do you mess around with hoaz. lol

[Vegetable4]

It's hard to understand him over the echo.

[dharmamark]

Who needs to hear it...he's full of it!

[InsideOutAnus]

Full of what? You don't believe the moon landing was a hoax, do you? I'll bet you also believe the government caused 9/11 and the drinking water is slowly causing your brain to rot.

lol retards.