People used to give large portions of their income to private charities. Hospitals for the poor were run by charities and churches. Big government put many of these out of business or corrupted them to the point of absurdity.
@JoeyFudd, if you really think that all of your taxes go to 'freeloaders'. What about that $1 trillion dollar war? In 2008, the US accounted for 48% of the worlds military spending. Do you think your taxes would be so high if we didn't spend so much just to kill other people?
Once again it's the People's Economist, the great Dr. Walter E. Williams, turning back the frontiers of ignorance while guest hosting for Rush Limbaugh!
He has trouble getting to the point, goes on tangents, and wastes words too much for my liking. He finally made the case around time 3:16. But did not mention that if I work 40 hours/week to make $2,000, and the government taxes me at 55% -- including state, federal, sales and gas tax -- then they have taken my time. Involuntary servitude. I have to work Mon, Tu, and til 3pm on Wed., every week for them! They take my time and money and misspend it. That's immoral, to reward freeloaders.
So it's not immoral if they give the money to people who aren't freeloaders? I disagree there. It's still immoral cus they're still stealing your money.
It's not so much that it's immoral but that it's economically retarded & serves lobbying interests who want to enforce current demand for their goods not to allow a consumer sovereignty. When we conflate economic growth with current demand for final goods we may as well stop saving and live on subsistence. Fiscal Stimulus makes no economic sense whatsoever. It ignores people's differing marginal utilities & time preference for future consumption & limits growth for present consumption. Tyranny.
that it's immoral or not is subjective. Also "economically retarded" is value-laden. A value-free statement (here I'm using "value" to mean "moral judgment" or "moral value") would be something like "fiscal stimulus is inefficient, doesn't actually stimulate the economy as a whole, and often stimulates production of goods that people don't actually want at the prices they're produced at"
Simple and well put. And this is the hole that we have been digging since the 1930's. We can correct this, but it going to take new leadership... {Not Obama!} And reeducation about how wealth is produced. The brilliance of Walter Williams
Bankers want to print money so they can control investment by distorting prices. Bankers know that this delusion of the price system to stop it translating actual relative scarcities between sectors, deludes their investment as well as to the state of market demand for whatever sector. They therefore need a cartel of bailout banks to remove 100% of the risk from their necessarily MALinvestment so investors take stipulation power from lenders (depositors).
Walter Williams is awesome! RP 2012!!
bjarnet3 1 year ago
Awsome, I love Walter Williams. I think a Ron Paul Walter Williams combo would be great!
enduro0276 1 year ago 2
People used to give large portions of their income to private charities. Hospitals for the poor were run by charities and churches. Big government put many of these out of business or corrupted them to the point of absurdity.
jamo387 1 year ago 2
Have anyone notice the leftists will emmedietly called these individuals "uncle" just because they are great thinkers, and conservatives.
macdogq 1 year ago
@JoeyFudd, if you really think that all of your taxes go to 'freeloaders'. What about that $1 trillion dollar war? In 2008, the US accounted for 48% of the worlds military spending. Do you think your taxes would be so high if we didn't spend so much just to kill other people?
elennon720 1 year ago
two-thirds of the federal budget goes to benevolence. The only thing the feds should spend money on is defense
stater68 1 year ago
Once again it's the People's Economist, the great Dr. Walter E. Williams, turning back the frontiers of ignorance while guest hosting for Rush Limbaugh!
bravo0105 2 years ago 2
He has trouble getting to the point, goes on tangents, and wastes words too much for my liking. He finally made the case around time 3:16. But did not mention that if I work 40 hours/week to make $2,000, and the government taxes me at 55% -- including state, federal, sales and gas tax -- then they have taken my time. Involuntary servitude. I have to work Mon, Tu, and til 3pm on Wed., every week for them! They take my time and money and misspend it. That's immoral, to reward freeloaders.
JoeyFudd 2 years ago 5
So it's not immoral if they give the money to people who aren't freeloaders? I disagree there. It's still immoral cus they're still stealing your money.
;-)
stealthswimmer 2 years ago 9
It's not so much that it's immoral but that it's economically retarded & serves lobbying interests who want to enforce current demand for their goods not to allow a consumer sovereignty. When we conflate economic growth with current demand for final goods we may as well stop saving and live on subsistence. Fiscal Stimulus makes no economic sense whatsoever. It ignores people's differing marginal utilities & time preference for future consumption & limits growth for present consumption. Tyranny.
Nintendomanwill 1 year ago
@Nintendomanwill
that it's immoral or not is subjective. Also "economically retarded" is value-laden. A value-free statement (here I'm using "value" to mean "moral judgment" or "moral value") would be something like "fiscal stimulus is inefficient, doesn't actually stimulate the economy as a whole, and often stimulates production of goods that people don't actually want at the prices they're produced at"
stealthswimmer 1 year ago
The fact that you equate 40 hrs with $2000.00 tells me all I need to know about you.
TravisBickle2 2 years ago
Simple and well put. And this is the hole that we have been digging since the 1930's. We can correct this, but it going to take new leadership... {Not Obama!} And reeducation about how wealth is produced. The brilliance of Walter Williams
KiddGalaxxy 2 years ago 3
Is Thomas a monetarist?
Betty5150 2 years ago
i think hes chicago school
Weeth 2 years ago
Simply put and to the fundamental point. Simple enough, even a liberal could understand it.
am60mo 2 years ago 6
We cant even get rid of Charlie Rangel, how does anyone think the fed could stimulate anything except disgust.
phantomcharger 2 years ago 4
Has anyone read his books ? Which one is the best to start with ?
oli1233 2 years ago 2
I'm not even american, and i love Walter Williams.
kjakobsen 2 years ago 6
You don't have to live here to be.
yammyspeed13 2 years ago
People are so wrong thinking that when somethingis legal its automaticlly moral.
NivoUF 2 years ago 6
People think that morality somehow comes floating down from the sky as soon as you're dealing with majorities.
ForABetterTomorrow 2 years ago 2
Would I be too much of a nerd if i said I have a favorite economist and his name is Walter Williams?
TheKuffarKid 2 years ago 6
Unfortunately you would be a respectable person, not a nerd :>
Also check out Thomas Sowell and Ayn Rand!
ForABetterTomorrow 2 years ago 3
Printing money by the FED = Legal
Printing money in your Basement = Illegal
TheLiberalssuckdick 2 years ago 18
Bankers want to print money so they can control investment by distorting prices. Bankers know that this delusion of the price system to stop it translating actual relative scarcities between sectors, deludes their investment as well as to the state of market demand for whatever sector. They therefore need a cartel of bailout banks to remove 100% of the risk from their necessarily MALinvestment so investors take stipulation power from lenders (depositors).
Bailouts=theft to enable zero risk.
Nintendomanwill 1 year ago