Psychic Witch Finds Little Boy Lost in 3 Mins +61402793604

[geoff2204]

Let's see her do it three times in a row.

Then I'll be impressed.

Until then, as Mr Burns said: "Continue the research..."

[ewetube546]

Oh yes we can all make guesses which turn out to be right. This does not indicate psychic ability. It just mean you made a lucky guess. Taking money for 'psychic services' is fraud unless you say your just guessing. @shambhallah yes I have spent my life working for charities and in the CFA etc helping people on a daily basis.

[ewetube546]

Its necessary to look at not just the hits (confirmation bias) but also the misses plus all the significant events that were not mentioned (in a reading). When you do this you find that so called psychic ability is no more than guess work. Someone without psychic ability will achieve exactly the same result, without the supernatural explanation which explains nothing, just raises more questions.

[shambhallah]

@ewetube546

How would you know? How many people have you helped and lives have you saved???

[shambhallah]

@shambhallah They send me letters of thanks...

[skepticzonepodcast]

Shé you may split the money with anyone you like. We await your email.

[shambhallah]

@skepticzonepodcast

Got to get through this month... very busy - will organise it in Dec for the new year

[skepticzonepodcast]

@shambhallah That's OK. On this video you say you have the abilities of psychometry and remote viewing. Are those something we can start to formulate a test on? For example only, we give you at random 1 of 10 watches belonging to 1 of 10 volunteers. You then use your remote viewing to zero in on where that person might be. (You would have clear choice of 10 locations) We repeat this a number of times, say 10 times and if you get 7 right we would then do the money test. Am I on the right track?

[tvdd1973]

So, within a strictly-defined patch of fairly open woodland a woman runs around a bit and then stumbles across the boy in his sleeping bag. THAT'S your evidence of paranormal power? Really? I could've found him. ANYONE could've found him; he obviously wasn't far away from their 'base' and there would've been footprints of the camera crew, production assistants etc. This is terrible.

[KenTheWillsy]

@tvdd1973 If anyone could how come the other five didn't ? - She Ran straight there! no mucking around....Boy place in at top She placed in at bottom - Shé went in the opposite direction from the others - so no foot prints you idiot! Skeptic supervisor Richard Saunders said to me before the test under the standards he set started ... "If any body does get this task they must be psychic.".... so ... if it walks like a duck and quacks like a duck....

[tvdd1973]

@KenTheWillsy You're hilarious. What standards are you talking about? A boy and a few members of a TV crew go and hide in the woods and six 'psychics' try and find him. Of the six, one woman DOES find him. Big deal. If she'd stayed put and TOLD people exactly where the boy was I'd have been a little more impressed (not convinced but more impressed) but the fact they all physically went LOOKING for the boy renders this 'test' as irrelevent. It's just hide and seek with pyscho-babble.

[KenTheWillsy]

@tvdd1973

The arrogance of assumption - of cause that happened - Shé drew a map where she was going before she started - but that got edited out - Haven't you heard ???- When you ASSUME you make and ASS out of U & You.

[tvdd1973]

@KenTheWillsy Mmm. So, in a programme purporting to offer 'evidence' of psychic powers the editors edit out the only piece of evidence that might have offered even a vaguely interesting discussion point? Mmm. I find that difficult to believe. Also, before you start calling other people an 'ass' you might want to do do a spelling and grammar check through your work. I'm going to leave this discussion and let you carry on supporting this fraudster, whom you appear to have a vested interest in.

[AGolstonT]

It's a good thing the cameras were in place near the boy first or we would have missed it!

[shambhallah]

@AGolstonT

Guy with  Steady Cam following us

[camx90]

Thumbs up if you searched: lost little witch (Left 4 dead 2)

[NMWMN]

Propoganda!

[ROTFLxLAWL]

Witch!! Wiiiitttcchhhh1!!!!! Kill it ! Kill it!!

[JoshFritz561]

there are 2 explainations..... either fake or real..... if real... most major religions state it's from the devil... if fake... then it's fake =P

[KenTheWillsy]

@JoshFritz561 Most major religions, base their religions on saints that do this kinda shit... for real...

[TheWICCACHANNEL]

i helped several cold cases.sadly...the one i remember,the girl was found dead, by my instructions.

[yournamehere954]

shes kinda hott

[Wehearthannahmontana]

everyone is psychic! you all just have to "awaken" you ability's.Which is very cool! :D

[leahcortina]

OMG! deja vu! LOL! i think ive seen that out cropping in my dream? then again..... maybe im psychic! YAY me! XD

[loudmouthspeaker]

there is so secret to what these familular spirits can do or the information these spirits will give people...

remember she is a toy forthe spirits they are in control... the deeper you go the more dangerious it gets..

its the spirits not her ... all dangerious

[downunderkiwi]

what is dangerous is the bible followers who think it there job to step in and burn the witch at the stake to free the so called dark spirits from there soul and then hope the witch finds peace with god. Yet you also belive that we have only been on earth for 6000 years and god placed earth here first and then made the sun.... and a place called hell so your loving god can place his children there forever and not feel bad about it at all. No thanks I take the risk of living with my witch  :)

[shambhallah]

Hahahhahahhahah er...em... have you ever considered that there may be another possibility???

[k0smon]

@loudmouthspeaker :: Please tell us what is so 'dangerous' about it.

[dharmathai]

anyone who markets themself is usually a fake and abusing people. People with real ability do not normally take money for helping others. Although some people do develp abilities but abuse them, They will have to deal with some karma for this.

I find this kind of commercial advertising really bad

glad she found the boy though

[shambhallah]

@dharmathai People with real abilities do not set up karmic debit for themselves or others by disabusing their abilitities for the ungreatful and the curious - universal law says Action, Reaction and cost - it is Newtonian.

[JealousInquiry]

I'd like to see James Randi get at her. Who knows.

[shambhallah]

Love to have an honest chat with our Mr. Randi....

Please introduce us in a public forum.

BB

Shé

[JealousInquiry]

Uh, I don't know him. I'm just expressing my opinion on the video presented and see how he would debunk her, if at all. >>;

[shambhallah]

Happy to take any reasonable test...

BTW this stuff is proven and scientific - there are technologies using it - and have been since the 1970s

Its not complicated - works like a crystal radio set

[wuweido]

you can find the james randi foundation here on youtube, and you can contact him.

[shambhallah]

Cool. !!

I have seen his debunking methods deterotate into mud slinging when he gets cornered though.

It is hard to respect that!

[wuweido]

Yeah I agree

[aikidunk]

just a chat, why dont you take the million dollar paranormal challange ?

[shambhallah]

I have offered several times over the last 20 years...

They won't take up my offer....

In fact the skeptic association was repersented at this test only went on the proviso that the reward was canceled before hand.

[aikidunk]

id imagine the skeptic association cancelled the reward because they had no part in setting the conditions of the test for this tv show, i predict (like iam a psychic) that you will never take the million dollar paranormal challenge!

[skepticzonepodcast]

@shambhallah Happy to test you any time. Forgive me but when did you offer to be tested and to whom from the Skeptics did you deal with?

The Australian Skeptics reward was never part of THE ONE from the start.

[shambhallah]

Hey Richard,

Fantabulous! Would love to be finally tested. Have requested it for 20 years

Isn't that what I just said about the reward.

Ps I believe that Dick Smith, the person who formerly backed the skepics reward, paid the $1 million ransome money of the kidnapped journalist that I confirmed was still alive in Somalia. To me that was better than me getting the reward myself

[skepticzonepodcast]

OK.. we are still trying to find out who at the skeptics you talked to over the 20 years. Could you let us know?

[shambhallah]

I'm not sure.

I have never been personally bothered with it - I have always seen it as school yard bulling But I am always willing to stand up to bullies...

The last time before the show was about 10 years ago, a few people that I had helped led by Linda um can think of her surname will try and find it, they wrote in lots of letters and endorsements about me to the then address for TSS. I wrote in several letters when James Randi was here bulling people offering to be tested aroundDon Lane time

[skepticzonepodcast]

Since we have no record of your attempts to be tested, we need to start from scratch. The Australian Skeptics challenge has nothing to do with James Randi. I'll have our challenge coordinator contract you and we can take it from there.

[KenTheWillsy]

@skepticzonepodcast Still waiting!!!!!! Here's Shé's phone number 0402793604

[skepticzonepodcast]

@KenTheWillsy Shé seemed to demand that she sues us depending on the outcome of a test. I say again that we are not calling her a fraud, we are offering her a prize. All she has to do is pass a mutually agreed test to see if she has any magic powers. If she does we can then test her, mutually agreed conditions again, for the $100,000. It is that simple and the same rules apply for anyone who wants to try. If she wins, she wins and walks away with the money.

[skepticzonepodcast]

@KenTheWillsy If not, oh well at least she tried. We are not making legal threats about suing anyone and indeed if she wins it will be us out of pocket. We are the ones putting our money on the line.

[skepticzonepodcast]

@KenTheWillsy What we do need is for Shé to write to us stating very clearly and concisely:

1. What exactly is her paranormal claim

2. Under what conditions can she perform her claim

3. What success rate does she expect

Then and only then can we begin to design a test, one that is in accord with her claims. We look forward to an email with the above-mentioned information. You can send it to our Challenge Coordinator, Mr. Ian Bryce - nsw AT skeptics DOT com DOT au

[EvanJCastle]

@skepticzonepodcast

Here's hoping Shé comes through and gets tested. It'd be great to finally find a real psychic out there amongst the pretenders.

Here's cheers to Shé! We're behind you! Take the challenge! Take the cash!

[shambhallah]

@skepticzonepodcast This has been done many times .... why wont they take me up on the offer???

[skepticzonepodcast]

@shambhallah We are taking you up on your offer to be tested! We just have no record of you ever sending us the following:

1. What exactly is your paranormal claim

2. Under what conditions can you perform your claim

3. What success rate do you expect

and we need that in order to start the process. We await those details. Please send to our Challenge Coordinator, Mr. Ian Bryce - nsw AT skeptics DOT com DOT au

[shambhallah]

@skepticzonepodcast

I think you have seen what I can do... But I will not subject my self to bullying pseudo testing!

The tests must meet the criteria for scientific and legal proof - must be judged by neutral parties.

I am happy to repeat the Brian Josephson tests

I would like it set up by a neutral third party... My son, who has an off the scale IQ and is currently doing a science degree could have some people set it up at his uni

Acceptance of credibility must be above statically averages

[skepticzonepodcast]

@shambhallah Unless you write to to our Challenge Coordinator, Mr. Ian Bryce - nsw AT skeptics DOT com DOT au with the requested information, we cannot test you. We will not test you on what we think is your claim, we will only test you on what you tell us, clearly, concisely and exactly IS your claim, under what conditions you can perform and your expected success rate. Once we have that we can suggest to you a testing protocol.

[shambhallah]

@skepticzonepodcast will do.... but as I have said it will only be under strict true scientific (not psudo-scientific) conditions - not like the crap bullying randi does... Are you familiar with any of the true scientific studies ... including Josephson?

[skepticzonepodcast]

@shambhallah Unless YOU and WE are happy with the final conditions on any test, it does not go forward. Believe me any test will be scientific and will have a clear result one way or the other and will be documented. If Josephson or anyone else, Nobel prize or not wants to apply for our prize, they are welcome to do so.

[shambhallah]

@skepticzonepodcast Richard, I have not seen any skeptic test that could be considered clinical scientific conditions - certinlly would not get FDA approval. Most of the testing videos I have seen are skeptics trying to label apples as oranges... I am happy to repeat a clincal scientific test that has already proved in the affirmative - under clinical conditions with real scientists - I have before many times - I am happy to split any reward with the origional scientist for further true studies

[shambhallah]

@skepticzonepodcast PS Thanks for that - I will contact Josepheson and the others and let them know to claim the prize immedately. They can use the money for further research funding - You are only 37 years late in paying him - will they be entitled to interest?

[shambhallah]

@skepticzonepodcast Ok Ok ... Keep your shirt on! I have contacted Proff Josephson at Cambridge University's Parapsychology dept and am asking his advise on the requirements I should stipulate and also consulting with another psychic who presented scientifcly tested proof to the "Aust Skeptics" to have them tell him that being set up under university lab conditions wasn't good enough...??!!??

You know how much I like to get things just right and not just spray stuff around hap-hazzardly

[EvanJCastle]

@shambhallah How about actually send through some information on how you would like to be tested. Call their bluff. Say you'd like to be tested under certain conditions and explain the conditions.

If they accept, then you know you have set the conditions you're happy with, so you should be comfortable.

If they say "no, we'll change it to this" and you aren't happy with the change, pull out! Who have you hurt? No one.

[shambhallah]

I would agree to true scientific testing - not psudo stuff, of he kind conducted by nobel prize winning Dr. Brian Josephson,in 1974, or by Dr Braud professor at Huston uni & others by Hickman, Mishlove, Kmertz & Lorenz conducted on Matthew Manning in 1977 proving in the affirmative

I have offered my own reward in the past for anybody that can prove I am doing anything fraudulent or even disprove my abilities in 20 years no skeptic has been able to claim that reward either...

[skepticzonepodcast]

You have? That's news to us. OK.. I'm up for that. What is your prize money?

[shambhallah]

No Money! I am not a millionaire, I am a minister But I am very good a publicity & have promised to send it out to all my contacts newsletter readers and periodicals, Now about 90,0000

But it is a double jeopardy

Must meet legal standards of proof for which I could be sued for deliberate fraud but the deal is if you fail I sue you for defamation

REAL STAKES

In addition, are you willing to try to disprove the Nobel Prize winner who found in the affirmative of psychic abilities?

[skepticzonepodcast]

The only stakes are our $100,000 which is what we offer. We are not calling you a fraud or a fake or whatever. It's a prize that is yours if you can do what you claim under agreed test conditions. If someone else, Nobel Prize winner or not, wants to also apply they are free to do so.

[Johngold1111]

Ths woman is an AMAZING paychic. I've had a reading with her and she was absolutely spot on in every respect. As far as I am concerned she is The One.