Fun fact: Son of Frankenstein was originally supposed to be shot in color, but they couldn't get the make up for the monster to look right in color so they kept it black and white.
EVEN THOUGH IT WAS SHORT IT WAS REALLY SWEET, FRANKENSTEIN LOOKS AWESOME IN COLOR. ITS LIKE SEEING THE HULK IN COLOR FOR THE FIRST TIME , NOT COMPARING THE MOVIES JUST THE CHARACTERS.
I can't say I disagree with 801 liveable, in the sense that I have never heard or read of early tinted Frankenstein move. I also have never heard of green being associated with fear.
@younghoss "THE PSYCHOTRONIC ENCYCLODEDIA of FEAR", pgs. 256-257 by MICHAEL WELDON..states "some of the original prints were tinted with the color of green, the color of fear". WELDON, says other early UNIVERSAL, horor films were also tinted..thanks for not judging before getting any information. i guess you can judge now..appreciate it..
This was Photoshopped huh? It must have been a pain to color it frame by frame. I made a Caramelldansen video that I had to edit frame by frame. I didn't have to colorize it or anything but I had to cut out the character from the background and add in another background which took awhile for each frame.
originally SON OF FRANKENSTEIN was going to be filmed in color but JACK PIERCE confered with UNIVERSAL STUDIO heads telling them shooting in color would create problems with the KARLOFF make-up thus black and white..
And according to Famous Monsters magazine, Pierce's makeup-on Karloff was greenish, so that when it was filmed in BW, he would appear a ghostly pale, or bloodless grey to moviegoers. So he was to appear pale to moviegoers, and filming in color would have required all new make-up to achieve the desired effect- that the monster's skin was grey.
@younghoss since we're discussing the color green, i read that a couple of early prints of "FRAKENSTEIN" were filmed with a tint of green..the reason given: green is the color of fear..
The only 'colorized' film I've seen was "Dr.X" (1932) which seemed like a nice experiment, giving the film a weird, psychadelic feel.
Interesting fact though: Marvel's The Hulk was originally based on Karloff's Frankenstein and was originally grey, then almost bluish before becoming green ... while some maniac once planned to turn him red for the TV-show!
@fenriz218 Note - DOCTOR X was not colorized. It was actually filmed in early two-strip Technicolor, although there is a black and white version too. It was filmed with two camera at the same time so they could have a color negative and a B&W negative for making cheaper B&W prints.
@fenriz218 HAHA ha a red hulk thats funny NOOO wait their is a new hulk in the comic books and he is red-------Now green hulk fights red hulk --- Can sell more hulk toys now and have some cool fights between them..
Awesome colorization work! I'm a huge fan of the old Universal and Hammer Horror monsters, and I miss the days of late night horror movie hosts like Count Gore DeVol and Ghost Host Theater. I'm always glad to meet someone else with a similar passion for the classics.
Very well done! Having done similar experiments in Photoshop, frame by frame, I appreciate the enormous amount of time you put into this brief clip. BTW, the Monster was indeed green as evidenced by Karloff's home movie from Son of Frankenstein which is readily available on YouTube.
there's no doubt about it, the use of b/w in the frankenstein movies of that era, particularly son of frankenstein, was a stunning example of cinematic expressionism, but i found this short flash with karloff in color rather thrilling.
Very nice video. I've read where the producers of "Son of Frankenstein" were actually thinking of filming the movie in color but decided it would cost too much so changed their minds.
The point of this little experiment was not to show the monster's true color, just to have some fun adding color to a scene. Karloff's make-up was actually reported to be a grayish green, which was chosen for the way it photographed in B&W. And though there were many green depictions of Frankenstein before the Munsters, Herman Munster was never green. There are many color photos and the color movie MUNSTER GO HOME (plus later TV movies) which show Herman as sort of blueish gray.
If you have an authentic color photo of Karloff as Frankenstein (besides those home movies shot during Son of Frankenstein) you have something no other film researcher in the last 75 years has been able to find. The closest thing we have is a pastel portrait by Rolf Armstrong done from life during the making of Bride of Frankenstein.
@kgammill i found it at comic con this year i took a picture of it and its now the wallpaper for my phone i found it in a stack of pictures at some guys stand but it was to expensive for me to buy so i just toke a picture of it
@grimlockfire How do you know it was an original color photo and not hand tinted which was VERY common then. He was a grayish green. Check out the 1938 KODACHROME 16mm home movies Karloff had shot of himself in character. You can see the set guys at work in the background. Kodachrome had the green spectrum improved in July 1939 making that portion of the color spectrum stronger to more closely reflect reality. Therefore, the way he looks in make up could have a bit stronger of a green cast.
@grimlockfire Actually there is a color home movie that shows Karloff and makeup man Jack Pierce clowning around. Karloff's makeup was green as it was in the original...
@grimlockfire Wrong. He was green. It was necessary for him to look the way he did in black and white. AND there is some honest to god COLOR home movie footage from Son Of Frankenstein showing Karloff in makeup playing around a bit with Jack Pierce. And he was GREEN. So shut your piehole grimlockfire. What Kerry Gammill has done is accurate and cool as hell.
@grimlockfire It's funny, I've known about that Kodachrome clip for probably 20 years as I simply saw it on TV during a monster special. I guess you guys must be pretty young.
@grimlockfire Actually, when you look at the actual color film taken on the set of "Son of Frankenstein," the color was green although that was only because green photographed better in b&w. Although it's true that corpses do turn green at one point so it wouldn't be preposterous for the monster to be green.
Not true. The Jack Pierce make-up was indeed green for the son of frankenstein and indeed amateur cine film exists of a green colored monster messing about with jack pierce. The only reason you believe he was pale white is because thats how he looked in a b&w movie.
Son of Frankenstein was originally going to be shot in color but Universal went back to B&W as it was difficult to make the monster's makeup look right. A documentary I saw had color home movie film of Karloff in costume clowning around on the set. Wish someone would find that and post it as well.
LOL. Do you know how long it takes to transfer ten seconds of films to photoshop a frame at a time, colorize each separate frame, then put it back together into a quicktime movie? Sorry that wasn't good enough for you.
@kgammill I don't know about those technicalities ... couple of minutes? So, when will you post the entire film in color? And, just to make sure and since people tend to complain anyway, better make two versions ... one in green and one in light blue ... ;)
From what I heard the movie was originally meant to be in technicolor. The Monster's sweater was supposed to help with the color coming out or something like that despite Karloff's annoyance with it. However it was ultimately filmed in b&w. It's not a problem really, I think b&w is fine. We colorized It's a Wonderful Life and it looks okay, but it doesn't have the same appeal. There's just a more emotional and artistic look to b&w and it focuses on the actors more. Regardless great job on this.
As both Jack Pierce and Mary Shelley made the monster, he was actually more of a pale yellow. Although, Shelley's monster was not made of dead people.
the hulk was based in part on the frankenstein monster. i dug how universal serialized the frankenstein franchise. it created a frankenstein universal universe that culminated in the munsters when it had grown too corny. but i loved it anyway. hammer didnt do to bad either. none of the modern versions in my opinion capture that feel of the old days.
Universal Studios had the foresight to patent that image to forever be identified as Frankenstein. What all the Studios created in the 30's & 40's including the star system will outlive anything created by "hollywood" today.
I agree. In todays multicolored, Hi-Def world, I find that B&W film is very soothing to the eyes and mind. I know it sounds funny, but I even like the soft popping and crackling of the old soundtrack, I find it relaxing.
I feel the exact same way. In fact, I'm on an active hunt for good B&W films, going back to the vault to discover stuff that is old, but new to me. B&W is VERY relaxing and atmospheric.
But somehow the image stuck and survived beyond the original B&W films. There are many depictions of Frankenstein as a "green" monster. In posters, drawings, etc.
I don't mind it, I can accept a variety of "Frankensteins"
I think this Great!!!!!could you try a snippit od Dracula,Your work is really great, and much appreciated.This from a old old horror fan, bring on the COLOR!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
that was neat. i have no idea how accurate the colors were, yet i still liked it. on the other hand, i'm not so sure that i'd wish to see the whole movie in color. for nostalgic reasons, i prefer seeing movies the way the original audience would have seen it. in some ways, watching a colorized movie seems like cheating.
The color film that exists is not a Technicolor test, it's a 16mm home movie taken by Karloff's family on the set. The color may not be completely accurate because of the film type and the lights used, but it's the only color film we have of the Frankenstein make-up. It doesn't represent the way the monster would have looked in a color movie. The greenish make-up gave the monster a pale grayish look on black and white film.
@kgammill It is true. Karloff's daughter came to a local theater here and showed footage of him in the make up chair. I dig your vids! I love colorized stuff. It really does make classic flicks a whole new viewing experience! I would love to see a clip of The Black Cat with Karloff and Lugosi colorized. It has so much potential.
There are technicolor screen tests that exist - you can see one on the DVD extras of the frankenstein legacy collection. Yes, it looks horrible - like wizard of Oz or something. The make up is bright green. The original make up is grey, to look like a corpse, and to show up better on B/W film. The bright green thing was for the posters.
ohhhhhhhhhhhhh i hate when classics with karloff and lugosi when they put it in color it ruins how authentic and inventive it once was and still is today
Actually, because of other movies from 1939 being made in color, namely Gone With the Wind and Wizard of Oz, Universal decided to make Son of Frankenstein in color. However, about midway into production, after watching the "rushes", the studio decided that the monster's makeup was too green looking and decided to go back and remake what they'd already done in B&W.
Wonderful! It would be great to see the entire film like this. Just as good, the 1929 "MYSTERIOUS ISLAND" retinted and colorized (to replace the lost color footage that only survives in b/w)
Fun fact: Son of Frankenstein was originally supposed to be shot in color, but they couldn't get the make up for the monster to look right in color so they kept it black and white.
Hawdkoah 1 month ago
EVEN THOUGH IT WAS SHORT IT WAS REALLY SWEET, FRANKENSTEIN LOOKS AWESOME IN COLOR. ITS LIKE SEEING THE HULK IN COLOR FOR THE FIRST TIME , NOT COMPARING THE MOVIES JUST THE CHARACTERS.
MultiJman69 2 months ago
My all time favorite Movie and in color. Wow guys more pleeze. King Karloff prowls again. thank you so very much for posting. love it.
TheShotgunslade 3 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
These movies need to remain in color.
FoxPlant2006 3 months ago
Comment removed
FoxPlant2006 3 months ago
BOO!!!!
cstoczyn 3 months ago
Happy Halloween!!!!
cstoczyn 3 months ago
I can't say I disagree with 801 liveable, in the sense that I have never heard or read of early tinted Frankenstein move. I also have never heard of green being associated with fear.
younghoss 3 months ago
@younghoss Me Neither
cstoczyn 3 months ago
@younghoss "THE PSYCHOTRONIC ENCYCLODEDIA of FEAR", pgs. 256-257 by MICHAEL WELDON..states "some of the original prints were tinted with the color of green, the color of fear". WELDON, says other early UNIVERSAL, horor films were also tinted..thanks for not judging before getting any information. i guess you can judge now..appreciate it..
801liveable 3 months ago
Awesome!
Sawlon 3 months ago
@Sawlon MMM HMM
cstoczyn 3 months ago
long live colorization!
monk22yrs 3 months ago
@monk22yrs HUZZAH!
cstoczyn 3 months ago
I'm feeling a bit lost myself.
georgee895 3 months ago
@georgee895 I Don't
cstoczyn 3 months ago
This was Photoshopped huh? It must have been a pain to color it frame by frame. I made a Caramelldansen video that I had to edit frame by frame. I didn't have to colorize it or anything but I had to cut out the character from the background and add in another background which took awhile for each frame.
twilightwindwaker 3 months ago
uurrrrrrrr COLOR BAD, COLOR BAD!!!!!
metaldave08096 4 months ago
@metaldave08096 OMG!
cstoczyn 3 months ago
Not bad, but it's much better in B&W.
IDaCashman 4 months ago
@IDaCashman Actually, I Like Both
cstoczyn 3 months ago
that was nice.
JBoogeyman 5 months ago
originally SON OF FRANKENSTEIN was going to be filmed in color but JACK PIERCE confered with UNIVERSAL STUDIO heads telling them shooting in color would create problems with the KARLOFF make-up thus black and white..
801liveable 5 months ago
@801liveable
And according to Famous Monsters magazine, Pierce's makeup-on Karloff was greenish, so that when it was filmed in BW, he would appear a ghostly pale, or bloodless grey to moviegoers. So he was to appear pale to moviegoers, and filming in color would have required all new make-up to achieve the desired effect- that the monster's skin was grey.
younghoss 3 months ago
@younghoss since we're discussing the color green, i read that a couple of early prints of "FRAKENSTEIN" were filmed with a tint of green..the reason given: green is the color of fear..
801liveable 3 months ago
@801liveable Oh, It Is Green, Huh?
cstoczyn 3 months ago
@younghoss I Thought His Skin Was Green!
cstoczyn 3 months ago
Remember when he tore those kids apart in the sewers under Derry?
splayedcadaver 6 months ago
The only 'colorized' film I've seen was "Dr.X" (1932) which seemed like a nice experiment, giving the film a weird, psychadelic feel.
Interesting fact though: Marvel's The Hulk was originally based on Karloff's Frankenstein and was originally grey, then almost bluish before becoming green ... while some maniac once planned to turn him red for the TV-show!
fenriz218 7 months ago
@fenriz218 Note - DOCTOR X was not colorized. It was actually filmed in early two-strip Technicolor, although there is a black and white version too. It was filmed with two camera at the same time so they could have a color negative and a B&W negative for making cheaper B&W prints.
kgammill 7 months ago
@fenriz218 HAHA ha a red hulk thats funny NOOO wait their is a new hulk in the comic books and he is red-------Now green hulk fights red hulk --- Can sell more hulk toys now and have some cool fights between them..
TheMaskaz 3 months ago
Awesome colorization work! I'm a huge fan of the old Universal and Hammer Horror monsters, and I miss the days of late night horror movie hosts like Count Gore DeVol and Ghost Host Theater. I'm always glad to meet someone else with a similar passion for the classics.
Karloff12969 8 months ago
Very well done! Having done similar experiments in Photoshop, frame by frame, I appreciate the enormous amount of time you put into this brief clip. BTW, the Monster was indeed green as evidenced by Karloff's home movie from Son of Frankenstein which is readily available on YouTube.
GTinsdale 9 months ago
Horror novel see video book trailer
dltanner99 10 months ago
Nice Work.
I wish they would colorized all the Universal Classics.
grapper6676 11 months ago
there's no doubt about it, the use of b/w in the frankenstein movies of that era, particularly son of frankenstein, was a stunning example of cinematic expressionism, but i found this short flash with karloff in color rather thrilling.
jimmysudar 1 year ago
you dont half get some idiots on youtube who do stupid things like this
we can all see its fake as fuck
redfenderguy 1 year ago
@redfenderguy
what?
kgammill 1 year ago
@kgammill Don't worry about redfenderguy. That's probably just the methadone talking.
CAPNMRVL 1 year ago
@redfenderguy Tell me please, how fake is fuck? LOL???
MrFBCBSALES 2 months ago
fake
indiemen 1 year ago
no shit
BobaFettRules321 1 year ago
I love colorisation....who did the job on WEIRD SCIENCE ? The Phantom looks really good, and the Karloff and Wolfman sequence.....
mytube5090able 1 year ago
Wonder what color the Monster was on that "Route 66" episode?
pylgrym 1 year ago
Very nice video. I've read where the producers of "Son of Frankenstein" were actually thinking of filming the movie in color but decided it would cost too much so changed their minds.
rider012 1 year ago
plus boris karloff was not green he was pale white the green frankenstien came from the munsters
grimlockfire 1 year ago
@grimlockfire
The point of this little experiment was not to show the monster's true color, just to have some fun adding color to a scene. Karloff's make-up was actually reported to be a grayish green, which was chosen for the way it photographed in B&W. And though there were many green depictions of Frankenstein before the Munsters, Herman Munster was never green. There are many color photos and the color movie MUNSTER GO HOME (plus later TV movies) which show Herman as sort of blueish gray.
kgammill 1 year ago
@kgammill i happen to have an orgianal picture of karloffs frankenstien and he was pale white not grayish green
grimlockfire 1 year ago
@grimlockfire
If you have an authentic color photo of Karloff as Frankenstein (besides those home movies shot during Son of Frankenstein) you have something no other film researcher in the last 75 years has been able to find. The closest thing we have is a pastel portrait by Rolf Armstrong done from life during the making of Bride of Frankenstein.
kgammill 1 year ago
@kgammill i found it at comic con this year i took a picture of it and its now the wallpaper for my phone i found it in a stack of pictures at some guys stand but it was to expensive for me to buy so i just toke a picture of it
grimlockfire 1 year ago
@kgammill See what I've just written.
paullubliner 11 months ago
@kgammill Sorry but those film researchers missed that 16mm Kodachrome clip!
paullubliner 11 months ago
@grimlockfire How do you know it was an original color photo and not hand tinted which was VERY common then. He was a grayish green. Check out the 1938 KODACHROME 16mm home movies Karloff had shot of himself in character. You can see the set guys at work in the background. Kodachrome had the green spectrum improved in July 1939 making that portion of the color spectrum stronger to more closely reflect reality. Therefore, the way he looks in make up could have a bit stronger of a green cast.
paullubliner 11 months ago
@kgammill But I like the way bsil Gogos 'colorized' FrankenKarloff, on the cover of FM# 21.
TheClam88 1 year ago
@grimlockfire Actually there is a color home movie that shows Karloff and makeup man Jack Pierce clowning around. Karloff's makeup was green as it was in the original...
paperraven 1 year ago
@grimlockfire Wrong. He was green. It was necessary for him to look the way he did in black and white. AND there is some honest to god COLOR home movie footage from Son Of Frankenstein showing Karloff in makeup playing around a bit with Jack Pierce. And he was GREEN. So shut your piehole grimlockfire. What Kerry Gammill has done is accurate and cool as hell.
CAPNMRVL 1 year ago
@grimlockfire It's funny, I've known about that Kodachrome clip for probably 20 years as I simply saw it on TV during a monster special. I guess you guys must be pretty young.
paullubliner 11 months ago
@grimlockfire Actually, when you look at the actual color film taken on the set of "Son of Frankenstein," the color was green although that was only because green photographed better in b&w. Although it's true that corpses do turn green at one point so it wouldn't be preposterous for the monster to be green.
Onlymusical 10 months ago
@grimlockfire
Not true. The Jack Pierce make-up was indeed green for the son of frankenstein and indeed amateur cine film exists of a green colored monster messing about with jack pierce. The only reason you believe he was pale white is because thats how he looked in a b&w movie.
hermankatnip 8 months ago
IMPRESSIVE!
yoshiofdeath 1 year ago
love boris karloff and frankenstein we ain't got films like this no more
trex6321 1 year ago
Son of Frankenstein was originally going to be shot in color but Universal went back to B&W as it was difficult to make the monster's makeup look right. A documentary I saw had color home movie film of Karloff in costume clowning around on the set. Wish someone would find that and post it as well.
jlovebirch 1 year ago
OOO now do the old phantom of the opera :D
invaderpink 1 year ago
Lovely job!!
Crackpot7272 1 year ago
That looks like ass.
Leatherbubba 1 year ago
wow how long did it take
georgechimpanzee 1 year ago
Comment removed
bobszvetics1 1 year ago
@bobszvetics1
LOL. Do you know how long it takes to transfer ten seconds of films to photoshop a frame at a time, colorize each separate frame, then put it back together into a quicktime movie? Sorry that wasn't good enough for you.
kgammill 1 year ago 23
@kgammill Amazing work... Looking forward to seeing future clips, do "Frankenstein Jr." :) "SUBSCRIBED"
PrimaveraPictures 1 year ago
@kgammill 100%
seriesdetv 1 year ago
@kgammill Fantastic job, thank you for sharing.
DammitDrag 1 year ago
@kgammill I don't know about those technicalities ... couple of minutes? So, when will you post the entire film in color? And, just to make sure and since people tend to complain anyway, better make two versions ... one in green and one in light blue ... ;)
fenriz218 7 months ago
Comment removed
artdamaged 2 months ago
@artdamaged Yes. Thanks!
kgammill 2 months ago
@kgammill Are you the same Kerry Gammil who used to work for Marvel Comics? If so, I loved your stuff.
artdamaged 2 months ago
Boris Karloff narrates "Peter and the Wolf," 1940s recording:
watch?v=EmgNPA5EwmM
thanks and regards.
classicvinylbiz 1 year ago
What...that was it?
MuzzleBlast357 1 year ago
From what I heard the movie was originally meant to be in technicolor. The Monster's sweater was supposed to help with the color coming out or something like that despite Karloff's annoyance with it. However it was ultimately filmed in b&w. It's not a problem really, I think b&w is fine. We colorized It's a Wonderful Life and it looks okay, but it doesn't have the same appeal. There's just a more emotional and artistic look to b&w and it focuses on the actors more. Regardless great job on this.
balrog13571 1 year ago
is that it??????
redfenderguy 1 year ago
you people dont know wat frakenstien is its a classic for the best horror movie is thats so manny ppl love it ?
mandy3784 1 year ago
Why not give fans the choice-you can always turn off the color. I'd repurchase em'all.
rickw1100 1 year ago
Wow , that looked awesome man. Big Thumbs uppy.
jayce79 1 year ago
people think that frankenstein monster is green because in the time the movie was made the monster was green in all the posters and publicity artwork
bernardoohara 1 year ago
Why do people think Frankenstein's monster would be green?
He is made of dead people so if anything he'd be pale white cause he's made of dead Caucasians (not Martians).
He'd only be green if he had some serious infections going on inside there.
FlamingoKicker 1 year ago
@FlamingoKicker
As both Jack Pierce and Mary Shelley made the monster, he was actually more of a pale yellow. Although, Shelley's monster was not made of dead people.
mouthfungus 1 year ago
A lot of the original Frankenstein movie posters were illustrated with him having green skin.
VinBad007 1 year ago
huh im lost lol
MrAchmed123456 2 years ago 2
Super job...from the few colour stills I've seen, you have his skin tone down perfectly...
joeyvader 2 years ago
Holy crap! Woah! Universal should hire this guy! Woah! It's better than those fake color versions they always do. This is great!
docbrownenterprises 2 years ago
the hulk was based in part on the frankenstein monster. i dug how universal serialized the frankenstein franchise. it created a frankenstein universal universe that culminated in the munsters when it had grown too corny. but i loved it anyway. hammer didnt do to bad either. none of the modern versions in my opinion capture that feel of the old days.
oldschoolsituationz 2 years ago
looks like hulk
wowarenthebuffle 2 years ago
wow do you do that ? thats awesome 5/5
brenwicru 2 years ago
Comment removed
Blackdragon52k 2 years ago
GUH-GUH-GUH-GUH-GO KILL YOURSELF BlackDragon :-D
Jeffzkrazie 2 years ago
im sorry =--(
Blackdragon52k 2 years ago
Does anyone know how to do something like that? I would appreciate if you told me.
TheUndead3eyedBeast 2 years ago
Incredible Frankenstein
mclein1097 2 years ago
It looks like a 1960 japenese movie in color !
1952kid 2 years ago
a nanosecond of frankestein in colour!!! how AWSOME is that?!!!1
s3ct4u 2 years ago
wow frankenstein looks fat
NazKing12 2 years ago
its his son...
SuperPingvinen 2 years ago
No....the doctor in this movie is the son of Henry Frankenstein, the doctor in the first....
supermax1998 2 years ago
you mean victor frankenstein?
arandomperson240 2 years ago
Well, in the 1931 Frankenstein they renamed him Henry, and this movie is a continuation of the original, so I used the name Henry.
supermax1998 2 years ago
lol
She80 2 years ago
damn kerry, i bet that took a bit of time! Victory Rolls is obviously an idiot not to think that was fun to see.
ki55army 2 years ago
Without the black and white
it just doesn't look the same...
it an old movie soo I hope that
people won't try to chance them ALL (old movies)
into color..!!! It as if they want to chance the history
of movie making..!!!!
VictoryRolls17 2 years ago 7
I love it! it looks very nice in colour!
54spiritedwill54 2 years ago
I agree!
aijinita60 2 years ago
Oh wow that looked Excellent!
alwaysxnever 2 years ago
Boris was the man! He played the best Frankenstein monster ever! he really gave him life!
gre2381 2 years ago 4
The Grinch stolen the christmas again... háa háaa...
jerryaltman 2 years ago
where did that come from?
emoviebuff87 3 years ago
Universal Studios had the foresight to patent that image to forever be identified as Frankenstein. What all the Studios created in the 30's & 40's including the star system will outlive anything created by "hollywood" today.
IMBakz 3 years ago
In the movie Weird Science, the whole creation scene is in colour
imbo8w 3 years ago
scary
ScrooYooTube 3 years ago
I agree. In todays multicolored, Hi-Def world, I find that B&W film is very soothing to the eyes and mind. I know it sounds funny, but I even like the soft popping and crackling of the old soundtrack, I find it relaxing.
Anyone else feel that way?
utube9000 3 years ago 40
Oh yeah, It's sort of like when Philip Glass did that new alternate score for the
Bela Lugosi 1931 Dracula film by The Cronos Quartet,
It's really irritating to the ears.
cha5 3 years ago
I feel the exact same way. In fact, I'm on an active hunt for good B&W films, going back to the vault to discover stuff that is old, but new to me. B&W is VERY relaxing and atmospheric.
wanghobb 3 years ago
@utube9000 I do and I always have love B&W movies the best because they actually had plots, etc... whereas in todays CGI crap the CGI is the story.
GhostOfACPast 1 year ago
@utube9000 Yep, sure do
MrWesdotcom 1 year ago
Very good 5/5
KaptainChronic69 3 years ago
you shoul try wolfman
RJGoldenPictures 3 years ago
Very nice little clip. Great job.
couchpotatotheatre 3 years ago
Yeah in the first two films, Frankenstein, The Bride Of Frankenstein the dead grey skin that you have for the monster is perfect,
Green skin really looks cheezy IMHO.
cha5 3 years ago
No. No. No. Black & White Classic ONLY.
yardleyaloe 3 years ago 5
Nice, though he shouldn't be green...
StephenCollins 3 years ago
FYI, there's a rare color clip on Youtube of Karloff as Frankenstein and the skin tone of the makeup is green.
utube9000 3 years ago
The make up was green to look pale & dead on black & white film. Pale make up would photograph 'blown out' and with no detail.
StephenCollins 3 years ago
Good point, I am sure you are right about that.
But somehow the image stuck and survived beyond the original B&W films. There are many depictions of Frankenstein as a "green" monster. In posters, drawings, etc.
I don't mind it, I can accept a variety of "Frankensteins"
utube9000 3 years ago
good color
warmachine1983 3 years ago
green is not such a dead color... ill say bluemis
BIackwatch 3 years ago
In the novel, he's described as yellow.
DrazharX 3 years ago
I think this Great!!!!!could you try a snippit od Dracula,Your work is really great, and much appreciated.This from a old old horror fan, bring on the COLOR!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
dominick03 3 years ago
that was neat. i have no idea how accurate the colors were, yet i still liked it. on the other hand, i'm not so sure that i'd wish to see the whole movie in color. for nostalgic reasons, i prefer seeing movies the way the original audience would have seen it. in some ways, watching a colorized movie seems like cheating.
coventrygardens 3 years ago 2
how did you do that
Cocainetheclown 3 years ago
i remember watching weird science and they were watching the origanal frankenstein in color. is there a colorized version of this film?
hymmie4 3 years ago
I tried that with Dracula. It's lot of work: you have to rembember all the colour proportions, colouring frame by frame...
Skawucheck 3 years ago
That's true..but?
There are some photos of Boris celebrating his birthday
on the set with Basil,Bela and Jack Pierce. He is seen blowing out the candles on his birthday
cake..messing up his sheepsking vest and smiling infront
of the cake and a bowl of popcorn.
143AC 3 years ago
I wish that that color home movie footage
taken of Boris in his "Frankenstein Monster's"
make..also showed him in character celebrating
his birthday with Bela,Basil and with Jack Pierce.
143AC 3 years ago
I think Karloff's wife was a little too busy to be taking home movies that day. She was giving birth to Karloff's daughter Sara. :-)
kgammill 3 years ago
Not bad! That colorization was actually pretty good! You deserve a cookie, Kerry.
brnleague99 4 years ago
The color film that exists is not a Technicolor test, it's a 16mm home movie taken by Karloff's family on the set. The color may not be completely accurate because of the film type and the lights used, but it's the only color film we have of the Frankenstein make-up. It doesn't represent the way the monster would have looked in a color movie. The greenish make-up gave the monster a pale grayish look on black and white film.
kgammill 4 years ago
Ah right, I must of remembered that wrong then... I just e
remember the horrible bright colours and thought of technicolor.
indiesloth 3 years ago
@kgammill It is true. Karloff's daughter came to a local theater here and showed footage of him in the make up chair. I dig your vids! I love colorized stuff. It really does make classic flicks a whole new viewing experience! I would love to see a clip of The Black Cat with Karloff and Lugosi colorized. It has so much potential.
honestabe666 1 year ago
There are technicolor screen tests that exist - you can see one on the DVD extras of the frankenstein legacy collection. Yes, it looks horrible - like wizard of Oz or something. The make up is bright green. The original make up is grey, to look like a corpse, and to show up better on B/W film. The bright green thing was for the posters.
indiesloth 4 years ago
The Original "Son of Frankenstein" was to be filmed in TECHNICOLOR.
I know! I am the Crimson Skull....
TheCrimsonSkull 4 years ago 3
This is true. I do think some of it was even filmed in color.....but is long since lost.
Good job to the original poster, BTW. Nice.
mickeeteeze 4 years ago
I don't like it. Looks horrible.
vamfv 4 years ago
Looks great
anton1990 4 years ago
Beautiful work, Kerry!
drjitters 4 years ago
I like it. A lot of people don't know that 'Son Of Frankenstein' was considered for color-in fact color test footage was done. Great Job!
Ganavon 4 years ago
Nahhhhhhhh...leave it alone! Keep it B&W.
horstrnr 4 years ago 3
Well said!
kgammill 4 years ago
Even though i love black and white, it would be interesting to see "Son of Frankenstein" which is terrific by the way, in color.
anton1990 4 years ago
ohhhhhhhhhhhhh i hate when classics with karloff and lugosi when they put it in color it ruins how authentic and inventive it once was and still is today
Kratos3993 4 years ago
i agree. it takes away from the creepy factor too.
nader112389 4 years ago 2
I agree
filmaddict818 4 years ago
I love it! I don't care who doesn't like colorization. Kerry Gammill is a famous comic artist, so he gets to.
axecalibore 4 years ago
dam just a tease
jmet718 4 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Actually, because of other movies from 1939 being made in color, namely Gone With the Wind and Wizard of Oz, Universal decided to make Son of Frankenstein in color. However, about midway into production, after watching the "rushes", the studio decided that the monster's makeup was too green looking and decided to go back and remake what they'd already done in B&W.
NorbertZF 4 years ago 2
Colorization.....Yuck! At least I give him credit for basing the colors on the home movie footage incolor showing Karloff on the set during filming.
GregK 4 years ago
Amen! I really hate Colorization,
It always looks like someone colored it in with crayons or puke.
cha5 4 years ago
Wow!
tintinesk 4 years ago
it looks very nice in colour!
but I still like the black and white
karloff4 4 years ago
I agree, it does look nice, but the BW version is still the only one for me
filmaddict818 4 years ago 2
Wonderful! It would be great to see the entire film like this. Just as good, the 1929 "MYSTERIOUS ISLAND" retinted and colorized (to replace the lost color footage that only survives in b/w)
Ganavon 4 years ago
Great stuff--Color Karloff! Reminds me of the color cover to FM# 21--by Basdil Gogos!! Great Job, Ken. From a fellow monstermag collector.
ghoulsI 4 years ago