Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)
- Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
or sign in to load a different list.
Loading...Saving...
Loading...Saving...
This has been flagged as spam show
FUK U ETERNAL HYPOCRITES.U AINT SHIT.NOV NPO?LOL.BOOKMARK TRUTH ON U WIKIPEDIA-WATCH ORG GIVE PRINT TO ALL!SUK IT REAL HARD CHILDHOMOs 24 7 RAPISTS!
wikipedosuk 9 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
The Murder of Meredith Kercher wikipedia article is being used as a platform to publicly prosecute Amanda Knox, by a crew of hostile editors/administrator that have interest in Amanda's Knox's conviction, who I suspect are contracted. Jimbo Wales got involved however the situation has not changed much. The truth is still being censored and the word smithing continues to spin the article to present a concept of guilt.
yoyohooyo 10 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Fuck Wikimedia.
zimm1986 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
At Wikipedia, well organized gangs of administrators capture and control controversial articles, banning their opponents and relentlessly churning out propaganda. For further information, search YouTube for "Wikipedia: an introduction, part III"
OzziePerch 1 year ago
Search YouTube for "Wikipedia: an introduction". One video is worth more than a thousand words.
OzziePerch 1 year ago
Reply: On any controversial topic, I do my own research. At Wikipedia, you must go back through the article history, see what information has been edit-warred in or out of the article. It helps to know who the main administrators are and which ones "own" which topics, and what their agendas are. Accept nothing at face value.
OzziePerch 1 year ago
Brilliant video to inform people what Wikipedia is really about.
Devourer09 1 year ago
Since high-ranking Wikipedia editors ignore the "neutrality" rule in order to push propaganda, this video is misleading.
OzziePerch 1 year ago
@OzziePerch:
Brush statement, much?
Akatam0t0ma 1 year ago
@OzziePerch {{cn|{{subst:DATE}}}}
Devourer09 1 year ago
@OzziePerch What alternative do you use?
mrhnm 1 year ago
@OzziePerch Some people do ignore the "neutrality" rule. Bias usually sticks out and is easily recognised. If you believe an article is biased, then do as this video suggests and redress the balance. If the unbiased material is uncited, then you can just delete it, but explain why you did in both on your edit and also on the discussion page.
Every editor has an equal say. If you are acting sincerely, and stand your ground, the truth always wins out. All in all, it promotes great articles.
SugarTomAppleRoger 1 year ago
1st
CR055H41RZ 1 year ago
@CR055H41RZ Way to go buddy! Keep up the good work.
Devourer09 1 year ago