Yeah for sure, its not the complete Instrumentalpart, but isn't that better than NOT playing Ripples? 10 Minutes like on the Album would have been too much time for a STADIUM audience. There are always songs that are working better in halls than in stadiums... And I have to say that Cinema is one of them.At least the Full Version.
The instrumental part of Ripples would lose its intimate mood in front of over 100.000 people i think. And its sstill a better choice than In too deep :D
Weak edited version! Why in the world did they cut out the best part of the middle instumental section. They had too many edited songs on the 2007 tour!
una obra maestra de este tipo no importa si se le baja el tono para que el senor collins pueda cantarla mas tranquilo... ripples... never come back!!!!
Just read that Phil is retiring. If this is true, then this song has even a greater meaning than ever before. So happy they did this in concert. So sad I did not go and see them one last time. So much of today's music is crap. Not all, mind you, but a large portion of it. When I look around and see what today offers us, musically, I can't help but be a little sad, for it is yesterday that holds the hapiest days of my life.
@pelle9114 Ich war dabei Live in Hannover. Kriege Heute noch eine Gänsehaut!!!! Bin Jahrgang 61 und mit Genesis groß geworden. Das war noch Musik, und nicht so'n Scheiß wie heute!!!
A shame Phil was a bit off his game with this performance. Voice ran out of gas on some of the vocals. He did an excellent job with it on the When in Rome dvd, though. As usual, the instrumentals are stellar.
You must be kidding. The studio version puts this to shame. The best part of the instumental part is cut out here. This is an embarrassing edited version with average musicianship. The 1978 or the 1980 versions blow this away.
Yup! The 2007 tour had too many edited songs. To cutout the best part of Ripples was horrible! This is a weak edited farce! Which is worse, this or the only 2 minutes of Duke's Travels they did.
I prefer his voice back when he had the beard. 1980 is voice sounded best!! But he sounds great for his late 50's. I miss when he had more power in his voice.
This song brings both good and bad memories back but no matter how bad it is, this song makes you happy and if the memories are good this song makes them better. Genesis has made a song that will last for century's.
Unfortunately I know what you mean. I don't think it's so much that his voice per se has deteriorated but more that it's very very hard to sing without decent hearing in one ear....
For my very dear friend, Matt, who sadly passed. We enjoyed many Genesis concerts together over the years & you died much, much too young. I know you are in a happier place now, but I miss you terribly. Until we meet again my friend...
I still think this is one awsome song,i used to do roady work for GENTLE GIANT,and they to played a similar kind of sound,and i love tat piano piece that goes into the instrumental bit.
This version can't hold a candle to the one on Genesis Archive #2. That version is so powerful. This one....isn't. Yeah I know they're all 27 years older, but still. Phil can't even do this song with half the energy he sang this with in 1980.
I like this much better. With the ,,Pheel" of 1980 it's a little bit too ,,Heavy Metal". This ist with more Energy, and the Rome Concert was much better.
Yes, it's not performed with the same passion as in the older days. Also it is slower, and in a lower key. But it is still a good performance, I think.
Sure it is, but my heart is a little bit upset, when I see new shows and old ones. I bought a 1976 dvd yesterday. They had so much power and fun. It looks at me they haven't the same fun like in old days.
Phil's voice may not be the same as it once was. The instrumentation may not be the original, The flow might be a tad off, as has been pointed out in other posts. But, it's still great to hear this song again. Folks- life changes, that's what this song is about. "And the face in the water looks up and she shakes her head as if to say that it's the last time you'll look like today sail away away you know that ripples never come back"
Daryl's solo on this rendition of the song gives me chills every time I hear it. They couldn't have found anyone better to replace the great Steve Hackett.
Yes, my idols are getting older, they'd come with me long years of growing. I never forget my times as a teenager, sitting in front of my window, listen to this song and forget my world around...! When I see this version I hope that they never forget, that they started as a prog band!!!! Keep on boys, and make a last great progalbum with Peter and Steve..only for a moment be a part of many good memories...
It does seem a bit stilted and not flowing smoothly like the original,plus Phil cant help putting in the 'stylings' in his voice that he's picked up since the late 70s,that have put so many people off him..is a shame as 'Trick Of The Tail' and 'Wind And Wuthering' are still my favourite Genesis albums,and i actually prefer Phil's live version of 'Supper's Ready' on 'Seconds Out'.
You know, even though Phil's voice has gotten deeper and isn't quite as powerful as it used to be, I love how he sang it in this version. You can tell he's really trying. And the guitar in the middle was every bit as effective as on the album.
For example, the way they played Firth Of Fifth didn't give me any goosebumps like the original version or some of Steve's versions. Sometimes they lack "that feel" by just playing hard on drums and keyboard and putting that awful Daryl's guitar solo. However, songs like Tonight Tonight Tonight, Mama and Land of Confusion were very very nice. But they are from the pop era. They're different.
I think we get different impressions from the songs. I'm not saying that they didn't do well recently, but that some songs simply don't match the original stuff.
I know that music is a matter of taste and I just told you my opinion. But, I don't think they played that good. Phil's voice is getting tired, Daryl's guitar is no match for Steve's guitar and Chester didn't put that "deepness" required for playing Ripples like in the original version. Putting all these things together, even if the results are good, they aren't as good as it could be. Plus, its normal that they change style after some time and the new style doesn't fit the mood of the songs.
Yes i really dont agree with you, but i do see that in this video his voice did not sound that good. I have other versions from his 2007 tour and they play it mutch better.
however its amazing how Phil's voice sounds just like it always has. but theres no doubt the man is not the 18 year old he was before, and those of you who are big fans of him like me know that he planned his touring days on his 2005 farewell, but the stage is his home, he cant leave it- no matter how much he wants to
You know, some bands were so good at some point of their carreers that they could never match the quality of their own material a few years later. How can we expect Ripples to be at least as good as the original version without Hackett, without Phil's voice the way it was and without him on drums? I think the only way one could make Ripples better was to hire an orchestra, a bunch of talented musicians, a female singer, call Steve back and really work on the song again. :P
Frankly, I don't think "Ripples" has ever sounded more beautiful than it did last year. Same goes for "Carpet Crawlers". I don't feel that the band members have to be in their physical and creative prime to sound as good or even better than they did in the past. IMHO, at least half of the set last year was the best they'd ever played those songs.
Well, it's weird for me to think how people can prefer the regular version of Carpet Crawlers after hearing Carpet Crawlers 1999. If the whole Lamb was reworked like that, it would be one of the best albuns in the world, ever.
this is actually the first time they ever played this song live on tour,they also never played trick of the tail live either. phil said trick was strictly a studio song,that wouldn't translate live well
@yesshows100 I've heard the studio version of Ripples and the 1978, 1980 and 2007 live versions - and I can NOT tell any difference - as far as I'm concerned, there are no edits.
Are you kidding. Listen again! The 2007 version has on a small portion of the instumental part, then they end it where the 2nd part is suppose to begin. Many people have noticed this. There are posts all over youtube. The best part is missing. Plus the 1978 & 1980 version have way more power. Instruments and voice. That's why the 2007 versions are 8 minutes instead of around 10 minutes. The studio version is in a class by itself!
Here is someone's comment from this video. I think the decision to cut the instrumental section in half was moronic. They left out the BEST PART!! WHO'S IDEA WAS THIS ?
Here is someone's comment from the 2007 Rome Ripples. What a bunch of shortchanging wankers they are, not playing the 2nd half of the Ripples middle solo. Keep it short for the dumbeed down masses. They are a dead band. Forget it, just watch them in 1978 and 1980 for the real Ripples.
I listen to Genesis more than anyone, and it took me 2 listenings to realize what they did. Thinking they were going to do Duke's Travel's / Duke's End I have friends that were going to fly to NY from Fla. to see the show at MSG. They cancelled the trip when they heard this, and that Duke's End was at the beginning of the show and Duke's Travels was only the last 2 minutes in the medley with the vocal part cut out! When Phil is suppose start singing, it never happens!
This takes me back to September 07 when Genesis played in Toronto when I was in attendance. I cannot wait for the release of the concert recorded in Rome that will be released in North America next month.
Ademàs el solo de èste video me gustò mucho. Daryl tambièn tiene mucha melodia al tocar pero tambièn otro sonido, quizà no tan original, pero me gusta igual.
Digamos que hackett es un guitarrista con màs sentimiento pero menos virtuoso. Daryl es màs virtuoso pero menos "sentimental". Hackett te llega a la mèdula, Daryl... a los ojos. Los dos son grandes guitarrista y aportaron mucho a la banda pero de ahì a mencionar que Stuermer es horrible, me parece una falta de coherencia y visiòn absoluta por parte del imbècil que dijo eso. Lo puedo aceptar de Mike Rutherford porque no es tan buen guitarrista como bajista pero tal denostaciòn hacia Daryl, no.
Digamos que hackett es un guitarrista con màs sentimiento pero menos virtuoso. Daryl es màs virtuoso pero menos "sentimental". Hackett te llega a la mèdula, Daryl... a los ojos. Los dos son grandes guitarrista y aportaron mucho a la banda pero de ahì a mencionar que Stuermer es horrible, me parece una falta de coherencia y visiòn absoluta por parte del imbècil que dijo eso. Lo puedo aceptar de Mike Rutherford porque no es tan buen guitarrista como bajista pero tal denostaciòn hacia Daryl, no.
Sounds great, but he does sound like he's struggling....is it true they're dumping this song for Hold on My Heart? I think that would be b/c it's easier for him to sing (notes not as high)....someone correct me if I'm wrong, but that's what I heard....
No, but Hold on My Heart was part of the set. You're right though, about the notes being a bit too high for him, but I think he got more comfortable with the song as the tour went on. Remember, this was pretty early in the tour...
a Diegoquemero: se ve que eres un ignorante. Yo vi a Genesis en vivo y este guitarrista es fabuloso. Hackett y Peter Gabriel deben estar arrepentidos de irse de Genesis....y en el fondo menos mal se fueron, porque nadie es indispensable y ahora es que hay Genesis para rato.
Mi opinion va para el usuario chupacabras, asi que no se porque me dices groserias. Guevada me parece una pesima palabra y hasta vulgar, no se si en tu pais sera una bobadita pero en mi pais es una falta de respeto. Genesis facturo y sigue facturando sin Hackett y sin Gabriel.
Desde mi punto de vista la salida de Hackett y Gabriel hacen que Genesis se vuelva menos vanguardista pero mas digerible y profesional sin demerito del virtuosismo de sus integrantes. Stuermer y Hackett son estilos diferentes. Es obvio que Darryl no se vea como Hackett que participaba en las composiciones y arreglos y las llegaba a sentir suyas. Creo que para entender y disfrutar a Genesis plenamente hay que tener siempre presente sus diversas epocas.
Yeah for sure, its not the complete Instrumentalpart, but isn't that better than NOT playing Ripples? 10 Minutes like on the Album would have been too much time for a STADIUM audience. There are always songs that are working better in halls than in stadiums... And I have to say that Cinema is one of them.At least the Full Version.
The instrumental part of Ripples would lose its intimate mood in front of over 100.000 people i think. And its sstill a better choice than In too deep :D
illegalalien2 3 weeks ago
The band has zero energy! Dead in the water. In 2007, they were probably too tired to do the entire song.
yesshows100 1 month ago
Weak edited version! Why in the world did they cut out the best part of the middle instumental section. They had too many edited songs on the 2007 tour!
yesshows100 1 month ago
una obra maestra de este tipo no importa si se le baja el tono para que el senor collins pueda cantarla mas tranquilo... ripples... never come back!!!!
tanoliam 1 month ago
Chester Thompson on drums...
hongkong506 8 months ago
I have forever love this song..Its beautiful,its amazing and its by a rock band...Its just such an amazemnt
Tod661 10 months ago
Just read that Phil is retiring. If this is true, then this song has even a greater meaning than ever before. So happy they did this in concert. So sad I did not go and see them one last time. So much of today's music is crap. Not all, mind you, but a large portion of it. When I look around and see what today offers us, musically, I can't help but be a little sad, for it is yesterday that holds the hapiest days of my life.
combatvf24 10 months ago 3
No hay mejor sonido que el de la guitarra de Steve Hackett..... Un groso!!!!!
mariov2880 11 months ago
Ripples ! Ein Song zum träumen und abheben. Und dies nun schon seit über 30 Jahren!
pelle9114 1 year ago
@pelle9114 Ich war dabei Live in Hannover. Kriege Heute noch eine Gänsehaut!!!! Bin Jahrgang 61 und mit Genesis groß geworden. Das war noch Musik, und nicht so'n Scheiß wie heute!!!
Wolfgang19611 11 months ago
A shame Phil was a bit off his game with this performance. Voice ran out of gas on some of the vocals. He did an excellent job with it on the When in Rome dvd, though. As usual, the instrumentals are stellar.
MrJamesonStyles 1 year ago
davvero niente male...
TheMony71 1 year ago
I think this live version is superior to the album version :)
SPeacock 1 year ago
@SPeacock
You must be kidding. The studio version puts this to shame. The best part of the instumental part is cut out here. This is an embarrassing edited version with average musicianship. The 1978 or the 1980 versions blow this away.
yesshows100 1 month ago
@SPeacock dude...not even close...they altered it,it's ok,but ok is not good for a band like Genesis !
ksjoyjespeace 2 weeks ago
I think the decision to cut the instrumental section in half was moronic. They left out the BEST PART!! WHO'S IDEA WAS THIS ?
hubiex 1 year ago
@hubiex I'm guessing....theirs?
kamwrites 1 year ago
@hubiex I didn't even notice.
SPeacock 5 months ago
@hubiex
Yup! The 2007 tour had too many edited songs. To cutout the best part of Ripples was horrible! This is a weak edited farce! Which is worse, this or the only 2 minutes of Duke's Travels they did.
yesshows100 1 month ago
I prefer his voice back when he had the beard. 1980 is voice sounded best!! But he sounds great for his late 50's. I miss when he had more power in his voice.
bassmanjoe 1 year ago
@bassmanjoe I think phil is a better singer now in a technical standpoint.. but he lost that quality he had back in the day
KMatteKudasaiC 1 year ago
Great, but I continue to prefer the original version.
kuren444 1 year ago
Beautiful song. :) I want to play this as a lullaby to my son or daughter one day.
SPeacock 2 years ago 8
Ein pure Diamant in der unendlichkeit des Pop Rock gedudels! Schade das Phil kaum noch was hört!
Haivieh 2 years ago
Love Daryl Steurmer's playing in this. In fact he seemed to have a better sound than previously in general in this tour...
cosmicjazzer 2 years ago
This song brings both good and bad memories back but no matter how bad it is, this song makes you happy and if the memories are good this song makes them better. Genesis has made a song that will last for century's.
kingofkeyboards 2 years ago 4
TRES BELLE VIDEO GRAND GENESIS..
70genesis 2 years ago
que buen sonido sale de la MESA.!!! IMPRECIONANTE LOS INGENIEROS
teclasnegrasnet 2 years ago
Que buena cancion!. La verdad una de las mejores que e escuchado de Genesis!.
Excelente!
octaviador 2 years ago
my best friend died and he loved this song so we played it at his funeral
warrock408 2 years ago 33
Wolf.-Dieses Video hat alle 3 Sek. aussetzer obwohl der Flashplayer geladen ist ( bei Titel Firth of Firth u. anderen auch --Aufnahmen Düsseldorf ).
bin schon stink sauer !
wolfgangmeisel 2 years ago
Die beste Video/ Tonqualität ! Danke.
wolfgangmeisel 2 years ago
Wolf.28.08.09Ich war mit meinem FREUND
auf diesem Konzert. Ripples ist mein FIRST SONG from1976. Das Medley der
80´er vor allem war Live ein Genuss!
wolfgangmeisel 2 years ago
Just shows you how far Phils voice has lost it. I know its 30 years plus since this was originally recorded, but he sounds awful.
badrogue66 2 years ago
Unfortunately I know what you mean. I don't think it's so much that his voice per se has deteriorated but more that it's very very hard to sing without decent hearing in one ear....
cosmicjazzer 2 years ago
@cosmicjazzer He went partially deaf?
KMatteKudasaiC 1 year ago
Unfortunately, yes. P C lost much of his hearing in one ear some years ago.
cosmicjazzer 1 year ago
For my very dear friend, Matt, who sadly passed. We enjoyed many Genesis concerts together over the years & you died much, much too young. I know you are in a happier place now, but I miss you terribly. Until we meet again my friend...
RipplesBlueGirl 2 years ago 4
Masters of their instruments !
OurVirtualJourney 2 years ago
I still think this is one awsome song,i used to do roady work for GENTLE GIANT,and they to played a similar kind of sound,and i love tat piano piece that goes into the instrumental bit.
BON VOYAGE.
citroeno 2 years ago
Two weeks in Spain!!!!!
mugencart 2 years ago
1:46 tony is drinking some beer :]
TheJohn01456 2 years ago 4
BLISS !!:-)
sanzip 2 years ago
I love the instrumental and Daryl's Guitarsound
PhilCollins93 2 years ago
This version can't hold a candle to the one on Genesis Archive #2. That version is so powerful. This one....isn't. Yeah I know they're all 27 years older, but still. Phil can't even do this song with half the energy he sang this with in 1980.
TheJman2600 2 years ago
Give him props for standing up there and doing it....even though he is clearly struggling here, he's pulling off as decent a version as he can.
rafalweb 2 years ago
He's trying to pay tribute to Steve and put his own stamp on it
fcernig33 2 years ago
I like this much better. With the ,,Pheel" of 1980 it's a little bit too ,,Heavy Metal". This ist with more Energy, and the Rome Concert was much better.
More Atmosphere, more Feel. That's how i like it.
A very good perfomance, anyway
chinwildc 2 years ago
Ripples 1976 doing shroomers in Saratoga Ca UNbelievable
jimmybfan 2 years ago
@jimmybfan
They didn't do Ripples in 1976. 1978 was the first time live.
yesshows100 1 month ago
Brilliant! They were so good before they became a singles band.
jackHNv 2 years ago
Amen Jack.
DrBones666 2 years ago
The best song ever !!!!
mackytikalika 2 years ago
Still shows what they used to be. The GREATEST band EVER!
jcoleman200439 2 years ago
Hm, looks like they are frightend to play with full power & heart. Remembers me to an old man not having sex to aware a heartattack.
Sorry, I'm a big genesis fan but...
SireThomasAsh 2 years ago
Reply to 'SireThomasAsh'
Yes, it's not performed with the same passion as in the older days. Also it is slower, and in a lower key. But it is still a good performance, I think.
123ThisIsMe 2 years ago
Sure it is, but my heart is a little bit upset, when I see new shows and old ones. I bought a 1976 dvd yesterday. They had so much power and fun. It looks at me they haven't the same fun like in old days.
SireThomasAsh 2 years ago
Just want to say, 1976 was 33 years ago, im sure they all had more energy back then!
zoebenton 2 years ago
Exelente. Un emblema. Inagotable!!!
palu2004 2 years ago
lkooc 2 years ago 2
grandi grandi grandi!!!!!!
60davide 2 years ago
Daryl's solo on this rendition of the song gives me chills every time I hear it. They couldn't have found anyone better to replace the great Steve Hackett.
JXCphoenix 2 years ago
how do they make an acoustic sound with electric guitars?
1musicman123 2 years ago
The guitar, more than likely, is equipped with a piezo pickup in the bridge that allows it to have a more acoustic sound.
keithpas 2 years ago
I like this version but it´s a shame that the guys shortened the guitar solo in the middle. Although it sounds pretty impressive!
These guys made my childhood brighter, it´s my first real love :-)))))
Hope they´ll come back one day.... I believe!!! YES THEY CAN!!! :-)))
Weihbischof1 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Algumas músicas nos remete ao passado, pois fazem parte de nossas vidas. Essa é uma delas!!!
paulorgloria 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Algumas músicas nos remete ao passado, pois fazem parte de nossas vidas. Essa é uma delas!!!
paulorgloria 2 years ago
Algumas músicas nos remete ao passado, pois fazem parte de nossas vidas. Essa é uma delas!!!
paulorgloria 2 years ago
Lindo... maravilhosa música. Volto à minha adolescência nos anos 70. O Genesis é demais! Parabéns para quem incluiu a música Ripples.
Giovannifialhonetto 3 years ago
Yes, my idols are getting older, they'd come with me long years of growing. I never forget my times as a teenager, sitting in front of my window, listen to this song and forget my world around...! When I see this version I hope that they never forget, that they started as a prog band!!!! Keep on boys, and make a last great progalbum with Peter and Steve..only for a moment be a part of many good memories...
tivedenkung 3 years ago
It does seem a bit stilted and not flowing smoothly like the original,plus Phil cant help putting in the 'stylings' in his voice that he's picked up since the late 70s,that have put so many people off him..is a shame as 'Trick Of The Tail' and 'Wind And Wuthering' are still my favourite Genesis albums,and i actually prefer Phil's live version of 'Supper's Ready' on 'Seconds Out'.
ProfessorPipkin 3 years ago
You know, even though Phil's voice has gotten deeper and isn't quite as powerful as it used to be, I love how he sang it in this version. You can tell he's really trying. And the guitar in the middle was every bit as effective as on the album.
Cotygeek 3 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Why didn't they call this song "Nipples" instead of "Ripples".....Damn it!
The Nagh ;-)
Nagheod 3 years ago
They did this song much better back on the
duke tour.Listen to the version on the box
set 1976 1982,it blows me away!!!!!!!!!!
bassmanjoe 3 years ago
For example, the way they played Firth Of Fifth didn't give me any goosebumps like the original version or some of Steve's versions. Sometimes they lack "that feel" by just playing hard on drums and keyboard and putting that awful Daryl's guitar solo. However, songs like Tonight Tonight Tonight, Mama and Land of Confusion were very very nice. But they are from the pop era. They're different.
afsartori 3 years ago
I think we get different impressions from the songs. I'm not saying that they didn't do well recently, but that some songs simply don't match the original stuff.
afsartori 3 years ago
I know that music is a matter of taste and I just told you my opinion. But, I don't think they played that good. Phil's voice is getting tired, Daryl's guitar is no match for Steve's guitar and Chester didn't put that "deepness" required for playing Ripples like in the original version. Putting all these things together, even if the results are good, they aren't as good as it could be. Plus, its normal that they change style after some time and the new style doesn't fit the mood of the songs.
afsartori 3 years ago
Yes i really dont agree with you, but i do see that in this video his voice did not sound that good. I have other versions from his 2007 tour and they play it mutch better.
Mumbleslove 3 years ago
Painful as it is i gotta agree with u.
however its amazing how Phil's voice sounds just like it always has. but theres no doubt the man is not the 18 year old he was before, and those of you who are big fans of him like me know that he planned his touring days on his 2005 farewell, but the stage is his home, he cant leave it- no matter how much he wants to
PearlyILoveYou 3 years ago
You know, some bands were so good at some point of their carreers that they could never match the quality of their own material a few years later. How can we expect Ripples to be at least as good as the original version without Hackett, without Phil's voice the way it was and without him on drums? I think the only way one could make Ripples better was to hire an orchestra, a bunch of talented musicians, a female singer, call Steve back and really work on the song again. :P
afsartori 3 years ago
Frankly, I don't think "Ripples" has ever sounded more beautiful than it did last year. Same goes for "Carpet Crawlers". I don't feel that the band members have to be in their physical and creative prime to sound as good or even better than they did in the past. IMHO, at least half of the set last year was the best they'd ever played those songs.
kylehudson00 3 years ago
Well, it's weird for me to think how people can prefer the regular version of Carpet Crawlers after hearing Carpet Crawlers 1999. If the whole Lamb was reworked like that, it would be one of the best albuns in the world, ever.
afsartori 3 years ago
This songs fuckin awesome!!
Twigboyone 3 years ago
Bleh, a step down.
Does anyone know if there's a song they didn't do a step down on this tour? Did they tune/transpose their instruments down a step?
rdnzl23 3 years ago
Who gives a f**k? They played "Ripples"! *salivates*
kylehudson00 3 years ago 2
This comment has received too many negative votes show
phils voice is totally fucked
MrFloydPink 3 years ago
pittfan, you're right,sorry
Goldengirl3896 3 years ago
You know, I hate to say this but this is a better version (visually) than the one on the Rome DVD. Anyone know who directed this?
yuga2 3 years ago
Damn. Even the actual band is playing the solo wrong. Steve Hackett originally used a hand-held synthesizer on the solo called an E-bow.
girvan123 3 years ago
I love Rutherford's double neck instrument!
jumpy27 3 years ago
Shergold
MrFloydPink 3 years ago
this is actually the first time they ever played this song live on tour,they also never played trick of the tail live either. phil said trick was strictly a studio song,that wouldn't translate live well
Goldengirl3896 3 years ago
WRONG. They played this on the Duke tour and the ATTWT tour
PittFan88 3 years ago
They played this at Knebworth Park in 1978
MrFloydPink 3 years ago
@Goldengirl3896
They did Ripples live in 1978 and 1980. Those versions blow this away, and are not edited like this one.
yesshows100 1 month ago
@yesshows100 I've heard the studio version of Ripples and the 1978, 1980 and 2007 live versions - and I can NOT tell any difference - as far as I'm concerned, there are no edits.
SPeacock 1 month ago
@SPeacock
Are you kidding. Listen again! The 2007 version has on a small portion of the instumental part, then they end it where the 2nd part is suppose to begin. Many people have noticed this. There are posts all over youtube. The best part is missing. Plus the 1978 & 1980 version have way more power. Instruments and voice. That's why the 2007 versions are 8 minutes instead of around 10 minutes. The studio version is in a class by itself!
yesshows100 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@SPeacock
Here is someone's comment from this video. I think the decision to cut the instrumental section in half was moronic. They left out the BEST PART!! WHO'S IDEA WAS THIS ?
Here is someone's comment from the 2007 Rome Ripples. What a bunch of shortchanging wankers they are, not playing the 2nd half of the Ripples middle solo. Keep it short for the dumbeed down masses. They are a dead band. Forget it, just watch them in 1978 and 1980 for the real Ripples.
.
yesshows100 1 month ago
@SPeacock
Time them. The middle section here is around 1 minute, 30 seconds. The version from 1978 is around 3 minutes!
yesshows100 1 month ago
@yesshows100 I've done what you've said... and you're right. (to the band) You FOOLS!!
SPeacock 1 month ago
@SPeacock
I listen to Genesis more than anyone, and it took me 2 listenings to realize what they did. Thinking they were going to do Duke's Travel's / Duke's End I have friends that were going to fly to NY from Fla. to see the show at MSG. They cancelled the trip when they heard this, and that Duke's End was at the beginning of the show and Duke's Travels was only the last 2 minutes in the medley with the vocal part cut out! When Phil is suppose start singing, it never happens!
yesshows100 1 month ago
@SPeacock
After they fade out of Duke's Travels, they do a crummy version of Afterglow!
yesshows100 1 month ago
I can't hear any kind of typical stadium reverb. That's why the sound is not so deep and fascinating as the cd.
salmacis81 3 years ago
The guy who posted it here mixed the 5.1 sound of this broadcast without the rear speakers. That's why it is sounding so soundboard.
rodolfostanic 3 years ago
Truly a great song,everything seemed to slow down when they did this in concert.
I went from being part of the show to observing it as a whole in the 4th row.
Harrybigloaf 3 years ago
Darryl's guitar solo on this track is unbelievable; gives me goosebumps every time.
JXCphoenix 3 years ago 2
This takes me back to September 07 when Genesis played in Toronto when I was in attendance. I cannot wait for the release of the concert recorded in Rome that will be released in North America next month.
DCB316 3 years ago
Ademàs el solo de èste video me gustò mucho. Daryl tambièn tiene mucha melodia al tocar pero tambièn otro sonido, quizà no tan original, pero me gusta igual.
salmacis81 3 years ago
Digamos que hackett es un guitarrista con màs sentimiento pero menos virtuoso. Daryl es màs virtuoso pero menos "sentimental". Hackett te llega a la mèdula, Daryl... a los ojos. Los dos son grandes guitarrista y aportaron mucho a la banda pero de ahì a mencionar que Stuermer es horrible, me parece una falta de coherencia y visiòn absoluta por parte del imbècil que dijo eso. Lo puedo aceptar de Mike Rutherford porque no es tan buen guitarrista como bajista pero tal denostaciòn hacia Daryl, no.
salmacis81 3 years ago
Digamos que hackett es un guitarrista con màs sentimiento pero menos virtuoso. Daryl es màs virtuoso pero menos "sentimental". Hackett te llega a la mèdula, Daryl... a los ojos. Los dos son grandes guitarrista y aportaron mucho a la banda pero de ahì a mencionar que Stuermer es horrible, me parece una falta de coherencia y visiòn absoluta por parte del imbècil que dijo eso. Lo puedo aceptar de Mike Rutherford porque no es tan buen guitarrista como bajista pero tal denostaciòn hacia Daryl, no.
salmacis81 3 years ago
I love this video!
Very high quality, Phil sing very good here
robrandongirl 3 years ago
Oh what a beautiful song! I heard it standing in pouring rain in Chorzów in Poland and almost cried! It was an amazing experience!
andruszek13 4 years ago
Sounds great, but he does sound like he's struggling....is it true they're dumping this song for Hold on My Heart? I think that would be b/c it's easier for him to sing (notes not as high)....someone correct me if I'm wrong, but that's what I heard....
rafalweb 4 years ago
No, but Hold on My Heart was part of the set. You're right though, about the notes being a bit too high for him, but I think he got more comfortable with the song as the tour went on. Remember, this was pretty early in the tour...
Admiral321007 4 years ago 4
The version on the CD is pretty good.
smadurski 4 years ago
I am still amazed they played this song. Wish I could have seen it.
smadurski 4 years ago 4
Absolutly the best song on the tour!
Slidetuba 4 years ago
superb
GibbonFrog 4 years ago 2
This comment has received too many negative votes show
darryl stummer sos horrible tocando
nunca podrás igualar el solo de steve hackett
cuando volverás steve?? te extrañamos
Diegoquemero 4 years ago
a Diegoquemero: se ve que eres un ignorante. Yo vi a Genesis en vivo y este guitarrista es fabuloso. Hackett y Peter Gabriel deben estar arrepentidos de irse de Genesis....y en el fondo menos mal se fueron, porque nadie es indispensable y ahora es que hay Genesis para rato.
karejimenez 4 years ago
Si es un excellente guitarrista pero Steve Hackett es mas que excellente. Yo si noto la diferencia.
chupacabras101 4 years ago
¿Arrepentidos? ¿Porqué? ¿Por el hecho de que ahora Genesis factura millones? ¿O habrá sido por una cuestión artística y de relaciones humanas?
Es decir, ¿no acabás de decir una tremenda güevada?.
arleco12 4 years ago
Mi opinion va para el usuario chupacabras, asi que no se porque me dices groserias. Guevada me parece una pesima palabra y hasta vulgar, no se si en tu pais sera una bobadita pero en mi pais es una falta de respeto. Genesis facturo y sigue facturando sin Hackett y sin Gabriel.
karejimenez 4 years ago
Desde mi punto de vista la salida de Hackett y Gabriel hacen que Genesis se vuelva menos vanguardista pero mas digerible y profesional sin demerito del virtuosismo de sus integrantes. Stuermer y Hackett son estilos diferentes. Es obvio que Darryl no se vea como Hackett que participaba en las composiciones y arreglos y las llegaba a sentir suyas. Creo que para entender y disfrutar a Genesis plenamente hay que tener siempre presente sus diversas epocas.
gusgus1961 3 years ago
wow i went to see them in toronto, love these guys.
TheTayMan 4 years ago 5
saw it live a few times this year.....
I love bluegirls
excelerater 4 years ago
Beautiful, beautiful..... I love Genesis
karejimenez 4 years ago 2
I can't thank you enough for posting this. I cried!!
CivilizedJerk 4 years ago 3
so beautiful!
SoulM8dSunshine 4 years ago 3
This has been flagged as spam show
Breathtaking...such a beautiful song!
SoulM8dSunshine 4 years ago 2
BEAUTIFUL
AeroZach1029 4 years ago 4
This is perfect!
heidi7t 4 years ago 5
NICE VID
vendetta1007 4 years ago 2
Wonderful...
alexandor 4 years ago 3