@daslimshady1: I believe you are correct to call this a quasar but naming conventions of active galactic nuclei (AGN) is a matter of semantics. The more general term is to call it an active galaxy or an AGN in case you are ever confused.
The guy said that the strong concentration of photons (light basically) would seriously effect a planetary atmosphere.
If so, how bad?...Because you have to remember that when he says "strong concentration of photons" hes not on about a laser-pen... It's a supermassive blackhole...
Any civilization that might be in that galaxy would not only have a brilliantly interesting night sky, but a very useful power source for probes and spaceships (in one direction) - solar sails ahoy! :D
imagaineif they found 2 galaxies shooting those beams at each other by coincedence and having a beam struggle like out of dragonball z xD. the chance of that is amazingly humongously stupidly low though :(
This video is clearly a naive representation of the central part of a QSO with the clear intent of point to the discovery of the effects of a jet. There are many simplifications that have been done. Goal of such videos is to provide a broad picture,so I think that saying that it is totally wrong is a bit pointless
@Maridianokus 1) there are lots of proofs for the corona,and yes it is observable since it emits the hard X-ray spectrum of qso (via inverse compton emission);2) the dusty torus is much further away from the BH,beyond the accretion disk,so it cannot belong to the BH. I think you're mixing things. The BH is just the object that trigger the accretion,all the rest (disk,corona, plasma,jets, dusty torus) is -of course- outside the event horizon. "Broad line region": region of hot-high speed gas.
So were are the errors in this video? It's not an exact representation even of what we know it's there: no hot corona, no broad line region and even no dusty torus. I would point to such features instead. What's wrong with the jets? They do not originate close to the event horizon...
I am totally calm. But, sorry, you cannot say that there are observations at this spatial resolution, simply because there are not!! So, actually, we don't know "exactly" how an accretion disk in a qso looks like.
No. There are no observations like this, because no telescope can reach that resolutions (we're talking of sub milli-arcsecond), not even radio telescopes. And if you put it like this, then colors ARE important. Such colors make sense only if you view them as false color representing a temperature gradient. And the "inside structure": to me it may represent just plasma dragged by the magnetic field.
That has little to do with astrophysics and more with graphics I would say. Furthermore, there is no observation available at the moment, to prove **exactly** how the accretion disk looks like...
No words are adequate, to describe what just played, but I would love it if NASA/ESA/JPL or whoever names these phenomena would name something a "nuclear shit thingy xray"! Brilliant!
Hmmm......what do you use that was a "newer" technology (newer meaning the last 500 years) that "nerds" didn't affect? This is one of the last things you should worry about as far as your "tax dollars" are concerned.
Muito bom. Bastante informativo.
cml794 1 month ago
IT'S A TRAP!!!
animationhero421 3 months ago
this is fake!
enoquelopez 3 months ago
Now you will witness the power of this fully armed and OPERATIONAL black hole!
TheGuyWithTheSniper 5 months ago
am i right to say this is a quasar
daslimshady1 7 months ago
@daslimshady1: I believe you are correct to call this a quasar but naming conventions of active galactic nuclei (AGN) is a matter of semantics. The more general term is to call it an active galaxy or an AGN in case you are ever confused.
CutzmanX 6 months ago
The guy said that the strong concentration of photons (light basically) would seriously effect a planetary atmosphere.
If so, how bad?...Because you have to remember that when he says "strong concentration of photons" hes not on about a laser-pen... It's a supermassive blackhole...
This is basically galaxy death-match.
DaHurler1 7 months ago
Any civilization that might be in that galaxy would not only have a brilliantly interesting night sky, but a very useful power source for probes and spaceships (in one direction) - solar sails ahoy! :D
yushatak 7 months ago
Its a billion or so light years away think this is so long ago what we now see, I wonder how this galaxies is faring these days?
mity15 8 months ago
:47 fuck you distract fuckingly that voice coming from nowhere
valdastikvaldas 8 months ago
I didnt understand :(
floopalomp 9 months ago
hm..... based on video statistics it would seem russians are the most interested in this video after the americans; I wonder why?
bbphnix 11 months ago
imagaineif they found 2 galaxies shooting those beams at each other by coincedence and having a beam struggle like out of dragonball z xD. the chance of that is amazingly humongously stupidly low though :(
wo0obly 1 year ago
IS IT TRUE
IN GALAXY
Faizann23 1 year ago
@Faizann23 all of this is true you are all fucking retarted
sk8terguy110 11 months ago
lol epic fake
GIMMA96 1 year ago
ima firin my lazorz
ltzul2vi7l 1 year ago
@ltzul2vi7l blarrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrg
what...tha fuck?
booooooooooooooooooooooooooooooom
djFede97 1 year ago
jaysus i would hate to be stuck in a broken lift with this bunch of commentators
daithisogood 1 year ago 2
wow !
stybarrow 1 year ago
the most epic lazer!
TheChosenOneOfRussia 1 year ago
This video is clearly a naive representation of the central part of a QSO with the clear intent of point to the discovery of the effects of a jet. There are many simplifications that have been done. Goal of such videos is to provide a broad picture,so I think that saying that it is totally wrong is a bit pointless
supergiuovane 1 year ago
@Maridianokus 1) there are lots of proofs for the corona,and yes it is observable since it emits the hard X-ray spectrum of qso (via inverse compton emission);2) the dusty torus is much further away from the BH,beyond the accretion disk,so it cannot belong to the BH. I think you're mixing things. The BH is just the object that trigger the accretion,all the rest (disk,corona, plasma,jets, dusty torus) is -of course- outside the event horizon. "Broad line region": region of hot-high speed gas.
supergiuovane 1 year ago
So were are the errors in this video? It's not an exact representation even of what we know it's there: no hot corona, no broad line region and even no dusty torus. I would point to such features instead. What's wrong with the jets? They do not originate close to the event horizon...
supergiuovane 1 year ago
@Maridianokus Bullshit? Why exactly? What's wrong and how should it be and how do you know?
supergiuovane 1 year ago
I am totally calm. But, sorry, you cannot say that there are observations at this spatial resolution, simply because there are not!! So, actually, we don't know "exactly" how an accretion disk in a qso looks like.
supergiuovane 2 years ago
No. There are no observations like this, because no telescope can reach that resolutions (we're talking of sub milli-arcsecond), not even radio telescopes. And if you put it like this, then colors ARE important. Such colors make sense only if you view them as false color representing a temperature gradient. And the "inside structure": to me it may represent just plasma dragged by the magnetic field.
supergiuovane 2 years ago
That has little to do with astrophysics and more with graphics I would say. Furthermore, there is no observation available at the moment, to prove **exactly** how the accretion disk looks like...
supergiuovane 2 years ago
Why?What's wrong with that?
supergiuovane 2 years ago
2:10
shahrizal123 2 years ago
No words are adequate, to describe what just played, but I would love it if NASA/ESA/JPL or whoever names these phenomena would name something a "nuclear shit thingy xray"! Brilliant!
Siamesemama1 2 years ago
gamma rays nothing survives that
masxutesno 2 years ago
the blue thing you saw must be "Jet" a radiation nuclear shit thingy xray
ewegfyciwdcd11 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
HOLLY SHIT!!!
ur all a bunch of fucking nerds!!!
i cant belive im paying
tax money 4 people
2 look up somthing
from a fucking movie!!
ur takeing it 2 seriously!!!
Amekuro015 2 years ago
Hmmm......what do you use that was a "newer" technology (newer meaning the last 500 years) that "nerds" didn't affect? This is one of the last things you should worry about as far as your "tax dollars" are concerned.
Thulgore 2 years ago
please explain how im using your tax money to look this up... lol
klooger28 2 years ago
I cant believe your grammar is so poor!
When you start substituting words with numbers, you know you need to go back to school... I wont even start with your shitty spelling.
Kill yourself.
MikeRotten15 2 years ago
this animation may just be a movie but this really does exist. quite interesting
wendysisgay 2 years ago
You're right, shouldn't have rised your nose from your book...
Acrimonator 2 years ago
what is that?.. that think like a beam
it's that possible?-- it's seems like a cannon!
aioria911 2 years ago
The universe is weird
henryvoo 2 years ago
No sound! BOO!!!!!!
029560 2 years ago
Audio starts at 0:47
luxfair 2 years ago
there is no sound in space, whatd you expect
rhinonose 2 years ago
jajajajajaja!!!
aioria911 2 years ago
dude is this real?
ye3ala2 3 years ago
its called galaxy 3c321
LeoE08 2 years ago
What if this is like a natural phenomena being used as a weapon by one galaxy onto another? :)
cloud0123 3 years ago
Is this Real?
joenpamtorres 3 years ago
It was in the news recently. Search for watch?v=fTKi4etU32c for a video called 'black holes' for more info.
stevebd1 3 years ago
Wow.
jfooj 4 years ago
Very interesting video. It could use some music in the intro though.
teknomaker18 4 years ago 10