How come Dick Grayson as Nightwing isn't a option because he's another superhero, while
Jason Todd is also another supervillain as Red Hood. By that logic Tim Drake should be the new batman. In my opinion though Dick Grayson is the better choise as he has more experience.
Well this argument is futile cause he did become Batman before Bruce came back, I'm sure that would of became permanent in the 'unlikely' event DC kept Bruce dead.
@unamaxify The classification of tomato is sometimes fruit and sometimes vegetable, depending on who is classifying it. A botanist would call it a fruit, a cook would call it a vegetable. So sometimes it's a fruit and sometimes it's a vegetable. But it's never a suspension bridge.
@unamaxify Look up the supreme court case Nix v. Hedden.
A tomato is never the same as a bridge. You're saying they're both electrical signals in my brain? No, the tomato itself is not an electrical signal. Just like if I take a picture of a tomato and a bridge, that doesn't make the tomato and bridge both pictures, therefore the same thing.
No my appeal to solipsism was to show you your contradiction about your
absolute certainty that the tomato was never in the same category than a bride.
I wanted to show you that your standards to determine the level of wrong
was entirely arbitrary and not based on logic. (please don't straw-men me)
My argument against gradations of wrong still is that "wrong" isn't weakened by an arbitrary defined similarity to right. 1=1,01 is just as wrong as 1=5000
@unamaxify I didn't bring up absolute certainty. All I did was make a true statement.
You have no argument to refute about certainty. You're resorting to solipsism, which is a pathetic attempt to save face in any conversation.
A number can always be rounded. And the point of rounding is so that you're not making up arbitrary numbers. If I drove 2 feet and measured it to 2.00000001 feet with a meter stick, then I would have to round that to 2, since the .00000001 would be arbitrary.
@ninjajesus81 "All I made was a true statement" You say that you didn't bring up certainty, so your statement could just as well be false -> what's the point then ? (a truth claim isn't tethered to certainty ?) - true you can round any number, just as well as you can add 5 to any number the fact is after that operation it wont be the same any more. - You're implying that without gradations of wrong we can't have decimal numbers (integer only) ? ->that's a false dichotomy fallacy
And that's called: extending someone's argument to ridiculous proportions fallacy.
Could you please for once not violate logic, it makes you look like a fool.
You stated gradations of wrong could existed because you were certain about the nature of a tomato. I just showed you that you can't use that to support your argument
because you can't be certain about it.
Your hole argument is based on everyday-speech error tolerance, not logic.
@unamaxify Extending to ridiculous proportions? Why should I believe you wouldn't appeal to solipsism in every argument where you're backed into a corner about a specific factual statement?
There is not one single thing you can say where I can't apply solipsism to say you don't know for absolute certainty that what you said is true.
That's what you did, even though I never claimed absolute certainty, you keep acting like I did.
@unamaxify And if you're going to say I can't be certain about a tomato because we can only be certain of ourselves, then that means you can't be certain about anything, including your certainty that I can't be certain about the nature of a tomato. So not only is your argument pointless and an obvious attempt to save face, but your argument can also be turned back around on you.
@unamaxify Not to mention you're all over the place with your argument. You tried negating my statement that a tomato and a bridge are never the same by saying that they can both be electrical signals in my brain (as if they both actually turn into electrical signals). Now you've abandoned that and went on to solipsism, which has nothing to do with the electrical signal thing.
I guess you realized that was a stupid argument and went to your last resort which you probably always use.
Victory ? is there a competition ? what's the price ?
-
Well i asked if i was to interpreted your previous comment as concession
since you didn't bring forth any argument, or respond to the one i previously made
-> You know the one about how you solve the problem of arbitrariness how one measures the similarity of 2 objects, and at what point you were justified to label them being the same as "half wrong" (or give me a precise definition of "half wrong")
"how you solve the problem of arbitrariness how one measures the similarity of 2 objects, and at what point you were justified to label them being the same as "half wrong" (or give me a definition of "half wrong")"
-
Last time you just gave an example
of which i disputed the validity, you just claimed certainty without proving it.
To avoid this i want you to give a precise formal definition of half-wrong not an example.
@ninjajesus81 Exactly! Well put! Even if you omit that it is sometimes called a vegetable, a tomato is related to a vegetable by simply being a plant. The only relation a tomato has with a suspension bridge is that they are both made up of matter which makes for a very very loose relation.
While something can only be right or wrong, the degree to which something is right or wrong is certainly subject to gradation. Our justice system subjects criminals to sentences based on how 'wrong' they are.
Sheldon is right! Batman is not a killer and is heavily opposed to guns. Jason is a merciless killer with a heavy use of guns, not to say that he isn't a "hero" in his own right. Also, Dick evolved into Nightwing as a form of promotion, he was always being groomed to be the next Batman, it is simply another promotion in his life. It's what Bruce would have wanted. Not to say Jason wouldn't bring interesting new light to the character, but he is far from made for the job. He is best as Red Hood.
I don't know one single person who supported JASON TODD as batman. Maybe they're trying to play Stuart up as some kind of rebel with different ideas. But if that is the case then they really should have chosen a better way of doing so. Because even if Stuart wanted Jason to be the next batman was there ever really any chance of that happening? I really doupt that. And even if i accept that. Why did Sheldon not at any point later gloat about being right? I thought he'd be all over that.
i agree with Sheldon. If Bruce really is dead, Dick should be Batman. I love Jason Todd but he really shouldn't be Batman. I agree with most everything he stands for but... Batman? sorry Jay. (the damn reboot is really screwing with my headcannon and theories)
I'm just trying to imagine batman and robin with Jason and Damian. It would probably lead to more mayhem in Gotham than all the super villains combined!
Jason Todd? Is he joking? He thinks the Red Hood who kills people should take over the cowl? Well jokes on him because Dick does become Batman and he's way better than Jason!
Jason Todd? Is he joking? He thinks the Red Hood who kills people should take over the cowl? Well jokes on him because Dick does become Batman and he's way better than Jason!
Apparently you're not keeping up with the comic books. In one of the universes, batman DID die and Dick Grayson took on the role of the batman after Bruce was killed. They're not wrong, you're just misinformed.
@YouSmellLikeACat The event they are talking about takes place way before Terry's time. In 'Battle for the Cowl' all four robins fight for batman's cowl because they thought he was dead. Dick wins and is currently fulfilling the role of Batman in Gotham along side Damian Wayne (AKA Bruce's bastard child). Later on through the effort of Tim (who SHOULD have been the successor to the cowl in my opinion) it was found out that Bruce is indeed not dead (just busy). ^_^
@Dranzira I'm assuming that you think that because it's how it happened in the movie Under the Red Hood, but actually Jason wasn't brought back my Ra's. He was resurrected when Super Boy Prime ripped a hole in time and space. And if fact, it was Tala Al-Gul that put Jason in the Lazarus pit to restore his mind (because he was in a coma-like state). Ra's wanted Tala to kill Jason. If anyone wants the story, they should read the mini series, Red Hood: The Lost Days (it's only 6 books).
@hammermjh Sheldon is right about everything. Even about reserving a seat on his sofa. It is his home and therefore rules. If someone considers it rude their interpretation is subjective. Any argument against Sheldon about morals and social convention is logically wrong as they were instituted by man, (containing judgement by a human mind) and ergo are also subjective. Sheldon is always right!
It's not more wrong to call a tomato a vegetable than a suspension bridge, both statements are incorrect, correction is a boolean variable, it's either true or false and both of the statements are false, just because a tomatoe may appear to be a vegetable doesn't make it more right that saying it's a suspension bridge. Spartans in Halo look like robots but they are neither robots nor aircraft carriers
That argument makes no sense. A vegetable is as much not a fruit as a sspension bridge is not a fruit. The overlap of produce is insignificant if the tomato is specifically referred to as a vegetable, which it is 100% not, just as it is 100% not a suspension bridge. One of have to argue a tomato is at least 0.01% vegetable for it to be less wrong than a suspension bridge.
@AfroNinja0077 Stewart was right about one thing, Nightwing was a superhero in his own right. When I found out that Dick Grason became the new Batman, I cheered.
@Lumberjackington Yes, it is basic Batman knowledge the Jason Todd kicked the metaphorical bucket in A Death in the Family. However in 2005 the Under the Red Hood storyline was created. It was revealed in Batman #638 that the new Red Hood was actually Jason Todd who had been brought back to life. He has since become somewhat of an antihero character and is currently in jail after the events of Batman and Robin #6. (Although apparently not for long when Batman and Robin # 23 comes out in May.)
While I do agree with Stuart that Nightwing is a superhero in his own right, I must side with Sheldon about Dick Grayson becoming Batman's successor. (Imagine my joy when it actually happened in the comics.)
This happened to me in class. I solved a math equation and my teacher said "Oh I'm afraid you couldn't be more wrong" then I looked at him... well you just watched the video I think you know what happened
@MissQuattrone Actually Sheldon was right. At the end of the Battle for the Cowl series Dick Grayson took up the mantel as Batman with Damian Wayne as Robin. Bruce has since then returned, proving not to have been dead but rather lost in time. Now both Bruce Wayne and Dick Grayson are Batman, Bruce is traveling around the world creating Batman Inc. while Dick stays in Gotham to protect the city. If you don't believe me look it up on Wikipedia, although I suggest reading the comics.
@Telele2 not to mention that jason todd became red hood so his arument fro dick not becoming batman because he became batman is moot the only way his argument wouldve proven true is if he suggested tim drake who at the time had not become red robin but in the end dick grayson was the best choice even if nightwing is great
I like Stewart.
evandergeld 1 week ago
sheldon is so right
11Lodestar 1 week ago
as we know now, Sheldon is correct. Team Dick! (no homo)
MyTubeIsBetter20 2 weeks ago
tomatoes are fruits botanically and vegetables culinarily!
gablison 2 weeks ago
Really dude?
Thaheadband33 1 month ago
How come Dick Grayson as Nightwing isn't a option because he's another superhero, while
Jason Todd is also another supervillain as Red Hood. By that logic Tim Drake should be the new batman. In my opinion though Dick Grayson is the better choise as he has more experience.
9thshaolindragon 1 month ago 5
@9thshaolindragon
Well this argument is futile cause he did become Batman before Bruce came back, I'm sure that would of became permanent in the 'unlikely' event DC kept Bruce dead.
RomulanStar 1 week ago
@9thshaolindragon Tim Drake is a hero in his own right as well... Red Robin.
TheThreeHeadedDragon 1 week ago
@unamaxify & ninjajesus81: I agree with Stuart on one point: these guys can be very stubborn.
Merti63 1 month ago
Sheldon is right in this one but Stuart later counters with a post-InfCri Joe Chill,which is completely valid!
FearlessSpinner 1 month ago
Comment removed
FearlessSpinner 1 month ago
The best thing is that Sheldon is absolutely RIGHT!!!!
If Stuart was right, Batman would be a murderous sociopath
comicmaster217 1 month ago
i can't say anything about the batman argument
but Sheldon is right when he says that "wrong" is not subject to gradation
the tomato being a vegetable is 100% wrong just as it being a bridge.
A fruit is more similar to a vegetable than to a bridge is entirely subjective
& doesn't make mistaking a tomato for a vegetable any less wrong.
unamaxify 1 month ago
@unamaxify The classification of tomato is sometimes fruit and sometimes vegetable, depending on who is classifying it. A botanist would call it a fruit, a cook would call it a vegetable. So sometimes it's a fruit and sometimes it's a vegetable. But it's never a suspension bridge.
ninjajesus81 1 month ago
@ninjajesus81
yeah i don't buy that.
A cook has no authority over plant-classification.
A botanist on the other-hand has.
Your argument said that the definition of the tomato is depending on the frame of reference(either the cook's or the botanist's view)
and you say the tomato is never the same as a bridge:
-Your brain interprets reality as electrical signals.
-so in that frame of reference a tomato and a bridge are the same thing
-they are information in your brain
= you're wrong
unamaxify 1 month ago
@unamaxify Look up the supreme court case Nix v. Hedden.
A tomato is never the same as a bridge. You're saying they're both electrical signals in my brain? No, the tomato itself is not an electrical signal. Just like if I take a picture of a tomato and a bridge, that doesn't make the tomato and bridge both pictures, therefore the same thing.
ninjajesus81 1 month ago
@ninjajesus81
Your argument fails because there is no absolute certainty about reality
other than "I think therefor my mind exists"
It could be that the tomato is nothing else than electrical signals in your brain.
(think hyper-realistic virtual reality)
Because you don't know for sure you can only make claims about the nature of the tomato in a subjective reference frame.
Subjective reference frames however are not relevant for questions about
right or wrong.
Do you get it now ?
unamaxify 1 month ago
@unamaxify Well if you're going to appeal to solipsism as a last resort, then there's nothing left to talk about.
Absolute certainty is meaningless, because we don't really "know" anything. Which means you could resort to solipsism in any argument about any topic.
So all it proves is you realize you were backed into a corner and you had no real argument left.
Not to mention you contradict yourself by stating for absolutely certain that there's no absolute certainty.
ninjajesus81 1 month ago
CTN
“contradicting yourself by stating for absolutely certain that there's no absolute certainty”
No i'm stating with absolute certainty that there is no certainty other than the existence of ones own mind outside a subjective reference frame.
Within a subjective reference frame i can be certain of all kinds of things like math, logic or the above statement.
Logic in it's self is a subjective reference frame, outside of it one could define one with different logical rules.
unamaxify 1 month ago
@ninjajesus81
No my appeal to solipsism was to show you your contradiction about your
absolute certainty that the tomato was never in the same category than a bride.
I wanted to show you that your standards to determine the level of wrong
was entirely arbitrary and not based on logic. (please don't straw-men me)
My argument against gradations of wrong still is that "wrong" isn't weakened by an arbitrary defined similarity to right. 1=1,01 is just as wrong as 1=5000
CTN
unamaxify 1 month ago
@unamaxify I never claimed absolute certainty. You're the one bringing that up.
And again, you're wrong. 1.01 can be equal to 1 if you round to 1 decimal place. 5000 can never be rounded to 1.
And you can stop with the rambling about absolute certainty. All you're doing is trying to save face.
ninjajesus81 1 month ago
@ninjajesus81
you brought up certainty: "No the tomato is not an electrical signal in the brain"
-
So you don't refute my argument about certainty
and just respond with ad hominem.
-
So how do you determine the upper boundary: at what point a number can't be rounded anymore, without making it up arbitrarily.
Because if you argue that that the border of wrong is arbitrarily i can justify everything, math, logic & morality would be devoid of meaning.
No more special pleading fallacy
unamaxify 1 month ago
@unamaxify I didn't bring up absolute certainty. All I did was make a true statement.
You have no argument to refute about certainty. You're resorting to solipsism, which is a pathetic attempt to save face in any conversation.
A number can always be rounded. And the point of rounding is so that you're not making up arbitrary numbers. If I drove 2 feet and measured it to 2.00000001 feet with a meter stick, then I would have to round that to 2, since the .00000001 would be arbitrary.
ninjajesus81 1 month ago
unamaxify 1 month ago
@unamaxify So your argument is that we shouldn't say anything, because we can't be absolutely certain about anything?
Is that what your argument has suddenly become?
ninjajesus81 1 month ago
@ninjajesus81
And that's called: extending someone's argument to ridiculous proportions fallacy.
Could you please for once not violate logic, it makes you look like a fool.
You stated gradations of wrong could existed because you were certain about the nature of a tomato. I just showed you that you can't use that to support your argument
because you can't be certain about it.
Your hole argument is based on everyday-speech error tolerance, not logic.
"wrong" is Boolean, face it
unamaxify 1 month ago
@unamaxify Extending to ridiculous proportions? Why should I believe you wouldn't appeal to solipsism in every argument where you're backed into a corner about a specific factual statement?
There is not one single thing you can say where I can't apply solipsism to say you don't know for absolute certainty that what you said is true.
That's what you did, even though I never claimed absolute certainty, you keep acting like I did.
ninjajesus81 1 month ago
@unamaxify And if you're going to say I can't be certain about a tomato because we can only be certain of ourselves, then that means you can't be certain about anything, including your certainty that I can't be certain about the nature of a tomato. So not only is your argument pointless and an obvious attempt to save face, but your argument can also be turned back around on you.
ninjajesus81 1 month ago
@unamaxify Not to mention you're all over the place with your argument. You tried negating my statement that a tomato and a bridge are never the same by saying that they can both be electrical signals in my brain (as if they both actually turn into electrical signals). Now you've abandoned that and went on to solipsism, which has nothing to do with the electrical signal thing.
I guess you realized that was a stupid argument and went to your last resort which you probably always use.
ninjajesus81 1 month ago
@ninjajesus81
Oh boy did i hit a nerve ?
You're all over the place ripping parts of my arguments out context
piling on more logical fallacies.
Its like a vicious circle every-time i expose a part of your argument as a logical fallacy
you come up with a new fallacy, it's becoming a bit tedious.
_
A bridge & a tomato are both matter (protons electrons & neutrons)
-Their similarity is depending on: at what scale you measure.
-I could argue two tomatoes are never or always the same.
unamaxify 1 month ago
@unamaxify Good troll tactic; call everything a fallacy without explaining what was the fallacy or why it's a fallacy.
Just stop.
ninjajesus81 1 month ago
@ninjajesus81
Well your last comment was a 3-Part answers,
i was just too lazy to deconstruct all that.
Partly because i already refuted most of it in previous comments.
But i'm happy to see that you finally came to your senses
and finally accepted that gradations of wrong can't be rationalized.
Or am i to understand that you think that calling me a troll would
prove you right ?
Oh wait that would be another Ad Hominem fallacy.
unamaxify 1 month ago
@unamaxify Now you're claiming victory, proving you never cared about what was true, only that you can consider this a win on your record.
ninjajesus81 1 month ago
@ninjajesus81
Victory ? is there a competition ? what's the price ?
-
Well i asked if i was to interpreted your previous comment as concession
since you didn't bring forth any argument, or respond to the one i previously made
-> You know the one about how you solve the problem of arbitrariness how one measures the similarity of 2 objects, and at what point you were justified to label them being the same as "half wrong" (or give me a precise definition of "half wrong")
unamaxify 1 month ago
@unamaxify This was over the moment you brought up absolute certainty. That proved you had nothing to say.
ninjajesus81 1 month ago
@ninjajesus81
So are going to answer ?
"how you solve the problem of arbitrariness how one measures the similarity of 2 objects, and at what point you were justified to label them being the same as "half wrong" (or give me a definition of "half wrong")"
-
Last time you just gave an example
of which i disputed the validity, you just claimed certainty without proving it.
To avoid this i want you to give a precise formal definition of half-wrong not an example.
(no circular logic pls)
unamaxify 1 month ago
@ninjajesus81 Exactly! Well put! Even if you omit that it is sometimes called a vegetable, a tomato is related to a vegetable by simply being a plant. The only relation a tomato has with a suspension bridge is that they are both made up of matter which makes for a very very loose relation.
While something can only be right or wrong, the degree to which something is right or wrong is certainly subject to gradation. Our justice system subjects criminals to sentences based on how 'wrong' they are.
thecodewerks 1 month ago
@thecodewerks Good point. Jaywalking doesn't carry the same punishment as genocide. I guess that other guy thinks it should.
ninjajesus81 1 month ago
Sheldon is right! Batman is not a killer and is heavily opposed to guns. Jason is a merciless killer with a heavy use of guns, not to say that he isn't a "hero" in his own right. Also, Dick evolved into Nightwing as a form of promotion, he was always being groomed to be the next Batman, it is simply another promotion in his life. It's what Bruce would have wanted. Not to say Jason wouldn't bring interesting new light to the character, but he is far from made for the job. He is best as Red Hood.
PeriwinkleOctopussy 1 month ago
"tea for me please"
aliciathefatpenguin 2 months ago
Kicker: Sheldon was RIGHT!
oneperson2person 2 months ago
But Dick did become Batman and Damien was Robin, neither Jason nor Tim. and anyway JASON IS EVIL, HE WILL NEVER BE BATMAN!
ZADER4427 2 months ago
@ZADER4427 he's not exactly evil he just does bad things for a good reason he's more of an anti-hero
TheEastunder 2 months ago
@TheEastunder Well yeah.... that's what I meant to say
ZADER4427 2 months ago
I don't know one single person who supported JASON TODD as batman. Maybe they're trying to play Stuart up as some kind of rebel with different ideas. But if that is the case then they really should have chosen a better way of doing so. Because even if Stuart wanted Jason to be the next batman was there ever really any chance of that happening? I really doupt that. And even if i accept that. Why did Sheldon not at any point later gloat about being right? I thought he'd be all over that.
loanser 2 months ago
@loanser It would've been funny if this had been mentioned in a later episode. A little easter egg for fans. ^.^
oneperson2person 2 months ago
lolwut jason todd is evil
hibbityhooblah07 3 months ago
...I have never liked this show, but if they continue this conversation, not only will I begin watching, I will buy every season.
On Bluray.
This is not a joke.
BlyssfulStorm 3 months ago
i agree with Sheldon. If Bruce really is dead, Dick should be Batman. I love Jason Todd but he really shouldn't be Batman. I agree with most everything he stands for but... Batman? sorry Jay. (the damn reboot is really screwing with my headcannon and theories)
havshee 3 months ago
I groooaned in pain when Sheldon followed them in...
HittokiriBatosai 3 months ago
what episode is this ?
miki7ish 3 months ago
@miki7ish Season 2 Episode 20, The Hofstadter Isotope
thecodewerks 3 months ago
cock blocked.
letsgo2marsdude 3 months ago
I would like to have coffee with her...... :) coffe = sex
JimPickins 4 months ago
wait doesn't Jason become the Red Hood?
transformersfan17 4 months ago
@transformersfan17 yep
1020Shane 3 months ago
I'm just trying to imagine batman and robin with Jason and Damian. It would probably lead to more mayhem in Gotham than all the super villains combined!
HolyinserthereBatman 5 months ago
"it's a little wrong to say a tomato is a vegetable, its very wrong to say its a suspension bridge" a keen and swift refutation.
tuseroni 5 months ago 17
This has been flagged as spam show
Jason Todd? Is he joking? He thinks the Red Hood who kills people should take over the cowl? Well jokes on him because Dick does become Batman and he's way better than Jason!
Abducted777 5 months ago
Jason Todd? Is he joking? He thinks the Red Hood who kills people should take over the cowl? Well jokes on him because Dick does become Batman and he's way better than Jason!
Abducted777 5 months ago
Terry McGuinness succeeded batman before he died so they're both wrong.
YouSmellLikeACat 6 months ago
@YouSmellLikeACat
Apparently you're not keeping up with the comic books. In one of the universes, batman DID die and Dick Grayson took on the role of the batman after Bruce was killed. They're not wrong, you're just misinformed.
DeShoXX 6 months ago
@YouSmellLikeACat The event they are talking about takes place way before Terry's time. In 'Battle for the Cowl' all four robins fight for batman's cowl because they thought he was dead. Dick wins and is currently fulfilling the role of Batman in Gotham along side Damian Wayne (AKA Bruce's bastard child). Later on through the effort of Tim (who SHOULD have been the successor to the cowl in my opinion) it was found out that Bruce is indeed not dead (just busy). ^_^
Dranzira 6 months ago
@YouSmellLikeACat That's true. (I liked Terry McGuinness.)
pyrogyra72 5 months ago
batman 2 cant be jason tood because wasent he killed by the joker? correct me if im wrong
DeathByChocolate1995 6 months ago
@DeathByChocolate1995 He was brought back to life by good-ol Ras-al-gul. Lazarus pits are amazing things...
Dranzira 6 months ago
@Dranzira dang im really behind on my batman arent I? hmm cool glad 2 know he's alive always liked him
DeathByChocolate1995 6 months ago
@Dranzira I'm assuming that you think that because it's how it happened in the movie Under the Red Hood, but actually Jason wasn't brought back my Ra's. He was resurrected when Super Boy Prime ripped a hole in time and space. And if fact, it was Tala Al-Gul that put Jason in the Lazarus pit to restore his mind (because he was in a coma-like state). Ra's wanted Tala to kill Jason. If anyone wants the story, they should read the mini series, Red Hood: The Lost Days (it's only 6 books).
Abducted777 5 months ago
@Abducted777 the best part about this post is if you dont know anything about the series every 3rd word is gibberish.
tuseroni 3 months ago
Other than scientific things, this is the ONLY time in 4 seasons that Sheldon was right about anything.
hammermjh 7 months ago 3
@hammermjh right about gradations of wrong or right about the successor to the bat cowl?
thecodewerks 7 months ago
@thecodewerks Right about Batman.
hammermjh 6 months ago
@thecodewerks both
TheEastunder 2 months ago
@hammermjh Sheldon is right about everything. Even about reserving a seat on his sofa. It is his home and therefore rules. If someone considers it rude their interpretation is subjective. Any argument against Sheldon about morals and social convention is logically wrong as they were instituted by man, (containing judgement by a human mind) and ergo are also subjective. Sheldon is always right!
MrLamaj123 4 months ago
It's not more wrong to call a tomato a vegetable than a suspension bridge, both statements are incorrect, correction is a boolean variable, it's either true or false and both of the statements are false, just because a tomatoe may appear to be a vegetable doesn't make it more right that saying it's a suspension bridge. Spartans in Halo look like robots but they are neither robots nor aircraft carriers
BlackAssassinBlade 7 months ago
Jason Todd as Batman? Absolutely not.
Doesn't he know about The Red Hood incident? back then, it was either going to be Dick Greyson or Damian Wayne.
Pffft, Jason Todd, what a failure of a nerd.
Archedgar 7 months ago
Stuart yawning at 0:46 hahahaha sorry, it's one of those things that you don't usually notice... but accidentally, I DID! hahaha
lagalags 8 months ago
Sheldon: Moore Wrong 0_0 1:09
lol sheldon face Epic!
ThaSeeDzZ 8 months ago
That argument makes no sense. A vegetable is as much not a fruit as a sspension bridge is not a fruit. The overlap of produce is insignificant if the tomato is specifically referred to as a vegetable, which it is 100% not, just as it is 100% not a suspension bridge. One of have to argue a tomato is at least 0.01% vegetable for it to be less wrong than a suspension bridge.
VexonCross 9 months ago 2
@VexonCross Sheldon?!?!
mcohen29 7 months ago
Sheldon is always right. Dick Grayson is Batman and he is one hell of a Batman too.
AfroNinja0077 9 months ago 4
@AfroNinja0077 Stewart was right about one thing, Nightwing was a superhero in his own right. When I found out that Dick Grason became the new Batman, I cheered.
pyrogyra72 5 months ago
Although Batman did say In Hush that Jason will be the greatest detective ever, Jason dies. So you'd think that Stuart would know that.
Lumberjackington 11 months ago
@Lumberjackington Yes, it is basic Batman knowledge the Jason Todd kicked the metaphorical bucket in A Death in the Family. However in 2005 the Under the Red Hood storyline was created. It was revealed in Batman #638 that the new Red Hood was actually Jason Todd who had been brought back to life. He has since become somewhat of an antihero character and is currently in jail after the events of Batman and Robin #6. (Although apparently not for long when Batman and Robin # 23 comes out in May.)
chibibirdiechan 10 months ago
While I do agree with Stuart that Nightwing is a superhero in his own right, I must side with Sheldon about Dick Grayson becoming Batman's successor. (Imagine my joy when it actually happened in the comics.)
pyrogyra72 11 months ago
Sheldon the cock block.. i just realized it
Balmore91 11 months ago 5
LMAO - Sheldon invites himself in.
FavreianVengeance 1 year ago 3
This happened to me in class. I solved a math equation and my teacher said "Oh I'm afraid you couldn't be more wrong" then I looked at him... well you just watched the video I think you know what happened
XboxAnnihilator 1 year ago
I hope Leonard appreciates Sheldon after this because Penny (the loosey goosey that she is) looked like she was gonna rock Stuart's world.
TomatoeAssassin 1 year ago 3
Funny thing is Sheldon is right
HBoardy92 1 year ago
the second robin would kill joker
Scythemeup 1 year ago
They are both wrong about batman. Neither of the first 2 robins could be him.
MissQuattrone 1 year ago
@MissQuattrone Actually Sheldon was right. At the end of the Battle for the Cowl series Dick Grayson took up the mantel as Batman with Damian Wayne as Robin. Bruce has since then returned, proving not to have been dead but rather lost in time. Now both Bruce Wayne and Dick Grayson are Batman, Bruce is traveling around the world creating Batman Inc. while Dick stays in Gotham to protect the city. If you don't believe me look it up on Wikipedia, although I suggest reading the comics.
chibibirdiechan 1 year ago 2
@chibibirdiechan The only true batman is the Bruce Wayne, even if others follow in his footsteps.
MissQuattrone 1 year ago 3
@chibibirdiechan dude is going alpha-nerd on people ass)
voodooman08 10 months ago
One of my favorite jokes of the show ! Lol.
lumiere2020 1 year ago
cockblock
syaoranpies 1 year ago 3
Stuart supports Jason Todd as Batman? And they allow him to run a comic shop??
For SHAME!!
Telele2 1 year ago 57
@Telele2 I would stop giving him my business. I would take my business to either Hastings or Mile High.
pyrogyra72 8 months ago
@Telele2 Same guy who doesn't take the hint when Penny invites him in for coffee.
pyrogyra72 5 months ago
@Telele2
Why, the explanation for that is quite simple... Stuart is one of us. STUART IS A HOODIE! MWAHAHAHAHAHAH!
MeinosKaen 3 months ago
@Telele2 not to mention that jason todd became red hood so his arument fro dick not becoming batman because he became batman is moot the only way his argument wouldve proven true is if he suggested tim drake who at the time had not become red robin but in the end dick grayson was the best choice even if nightwing is great
TheEastunder 2 months ago
@TheEastunder woops i said batman because he became batman meant to say batman because he became nightwing my bad
TheEastunder 2 months ago
@Telele2 as Robin
donneric 2 months ago
Lol my favorite line by Stuart.
KairiPrincessOfHeart 1 year ago 29
@KairiPrincessOfHeart I love it because shuts Sheldon down and is an argument Sheldon cannot refute.
thecodewerks 1 year ago 16
@KairiPrincessOfHeart I think it's my favorite line on the entire show. Somehow it reminds me of the Relativity of Wrong by Isaac Asimov.
Tatarize 2 months ago
too late for coffeee LOOOOOOOOOL
angles19 1 year ago