Added: 4 years ago
From: areyoustilllistening
Views: 1,860,337
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (108,786)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • Wait, you guys mean that this is not how evolution works? And here I've been waiting like a fool all day hoping for energies to somehow do stuff and magically create a horse I could ride to the liquor store. Fine, I'll go myself. Stupid evolution doesn't work.

  • Since God has always physically looked like a male human, why does God have dick/balls/nipples? The anatomy of homo sapiens is adapted to environmental needs, without the environment there is no environmental pressure to demand these traits, so why does the biblical God have them?

    Since man was made first, why do men have nipples? Science shows us they are vestigial because embryos always develop as female first while the Y chromosome is expressed later, but creation myths contradict this data.

  • Comment removed

  • LOL. A new study of 137 countries has confirmed that people with lower IQ's are more likely to believe in God entities/religion.

  • This is freaking awesome.

    The argument is so ridiculous it's just amazing.

  • Why people who don't understand science shouldn't talk about it.

  • I am a Christian. I don't believe in naturalism. Yet despite that, I find this video ridiculous....

  • i realy dont think they even have the slightest idea of what science is.

  • /facepalm

  • I love how many dislikes this video has. it shows how much atheists troll and how much God is on their mind, lol. Why spend so much time trying to contradict something you don't believe in? After all, you're only waisting you're time right? I don't get it. Oh, that's right, i guess you need faith not to believe in God. Problem solved.

  • @177deerhunter "Oh, that's right, i guess you need faith not to believe in God"

    Not really. All you need to do to not believe in god is to follow the evidence and not shove and unknown and untraceable entity into the gaps that may appear in places.

    Though to answer your question we debate because we want to, because it is a very important philosophical topic and because we don't agree with the things that strong/religious belief in god requires, mainly.

  • @177deerhunter

    "Why spend so much time trying to contradict something you dont believe in"

    Because cooperation and sharing of information is a characteristic inherent to bipedal primates

    And science is what advances life in the cosmos. Religion is what holds them back. Its goal is to keep people on a lower level for control & profit

    Religion is actually a way to measure the progress of sentient life; The more religion they have, the less technology and knowledge they possess

  • What does the creation of life have to do with evolution?! Serious fail.

  • this makes me really freaking sad. people like this exist....

  • WTF? Peanut Butter? New life? Are these people delusional?

  • Wth even, i dont even. What the fuck

  • does anyone notice the holes in the peanut butter.

    god damn theists opened the jar before the video and took the new life out

    evolution exists

    QED

  • this is a true genious. I bet his parents were brother and sister

  • @Cantjeuh Nope for this kind of stupidity your looking at a father/daughter union....

  • @MW2PeteB11 yeah, that is more likely

  • so stupid i feel my iq points decreasing

  • This man knows as little about science as my 10yo brother!!!!

  • Every major scientist know evolutions is impossible. You folks have to find a different lie to dispute the Creator, because your old lie is old, tired and dead.

  • @HUDARE46B

    "Every major scientist know evolutions is impossible"

    Oh, you mean every major christian "scientist" who's field of study has nothing to do with biology or chemistry?

    Yeah, most of those people would tend to agree with their religion rather than with the facts.

  • @HUDARE46B The National Academy of Sciences acknowledges evolution to be a factual scientific observation. Nice try though. If you can name even one "major scientist" that thinks evolution is false, hit me up.

  • "Nice try though. If you can name even one "major scientist" that thinks evolution is false, hit me up." Oh there are plenty, but anyone I would name you'd use the One True Scotsman Fallacy and try to tell me he doesn't count. You'll move the goal posts to suit your need. I know your kind. BTW The National Academy of Sciences is a fukking joke.

  • @MaximusArurealius Wow, can't tell if trolling or actually stupid. Here is why.

    You calling a logical fallacy on me before I've even said anything is a fucking cop out. You just can't answer the question and are avoiding it.

    Right after calling the One True Scotsman, you called the NAS a joke which can easily be translated to "they aren't true scientists" making you a hypocrite and a logical failure.

    Next?

  • @Rygads Oh wah wah wah

    hahahahahahahahaaa what a crybaby. FACT: NAS IS a joke. AND you're an idiot. I caught you at your own game. Pisses you off doesn't it?

  • @MaximusArurealius Lol, I can just imagine you smashing the keys on your keyboard as you typed that. Careful not to wake your parents up, they might yell at you.

  • @Rygads His complete lack of intelligence is staggering to behold isn't it. One could easily have a more intelligent conversation with an armadillo that has been hit by a semi.

  • @HUDARE46B Oh, and I mean scientists that have at least studies biology. Anybody who knows anything about biology knows that evolution is fact.

  • @Rygads Atheists acknowledge this, atheists acknowledge that. Who cares? They're all going to hell and will be rowing you down the lake of fire.

  • @whatswithalltheblack

    Hell sounds fun, I might give it a try.

  • @Protection220 Give it a try? There is no coming back. You're already doomed anyway for thinking that this is a light hearted issue. God has your number and will be calling it soon enough.

  • @whatswithalltheblack

    I thought he loved me, damn.

    What a shame.

  • @Protection220 Nope. You had your chance. He loved you when you were a child, then you became wicked and chose to be a sinner. You'll find out when the rapture comes.

  • @whatswithalltheblack The rapture that was claimed to happen at least 100 times already yet for some reason the dates always come and go??

  • Oh and whatswithalltheblack, I have a question, will I go to hell if I say god likes to fuck his son jesus in the ass with his huge ass dick and then cum in his eyes and piss down his throat?

    I sure do hope not cause I don't wanna go to hell.

  • @mastrtonberry2 Who are you to judge God on when he will choose the rapture. All I can say is sit back and enjoy your detriments for as long as you can as you're not going to have much of an afterlife. Only burning and endless agony. Sorry. I don't know if you have time to make up for your ways or not. I'd begin now.

  • @whatswithalltheblack

    "All I can say is sit back and enjoy your detriments"

    And we expect nothing more from you. Theists dont understand science and therefore cant form logical arguments. All they do is hold up peanut butter or bury their heads in ancient mythical literature and tell themselves that there's a magical place in the clouds where all the mean smart people won't be and you'll get to run around forever in God's fields full of rainbows and constant lightning, AWW

  • @confettibrains Atheists don't understand modern science in all it's falsehoods. The bible says that in the final days there will be an ever increasing spate of non-believers. You are helping to prove my point and the allmighty absolutely correct.(not that God could be wrong). That 'ancient mythical literature' is the word of God himself and is 'historical science'. A science that must be believed by you or it will be at your own peril. God loves you but is hurt by you.

  • @whatswithalltheblack So theists understand science better than atheists, then?

    In the vast majority of cases, this is simply incorrect.

  • @whatswithalltheblack Since modern science is not filled with falsehoods, it looks like you and your nonexistent sky daddy are up shit creek. There is no evidence that the bible is the word of god or that the insane evangelical god even exists. The bible contains no valid science at all.

  • @Atalatl Historical science says it is. Modern Science has proved nothing to the contrary.

  • @whatswithalltheblack "Atheists don't understand modern science in all it's falsehoods."

    what stupid crap

    " The bible says "

    So your really a sock puppet of poetgb

    "That 'ancient mythical literature' is the word of God himself "

    Prove it

    "God loves you but is hurt by you."

    Prove it

  • @whatswithalltheblack

    "The bible says that in the final days there will be an ever increasing spate of non-believers"

    And the bible writers wrote that because they realized knowledge always increases with time, and that people in the future would be able to discredit the mythical stories in the bible. So they prophecize things like "the end is near if people dont believe this religion!" and "people will one day not believe the bible, thereby making all of it true!"

  • @whatswithalltheblack

    "That 'ancient mythical literature' is the word of God himself"

    So God looks like a male human and he likes having animals sacrified to him and their carcasses burned on an altar along with fat taken from the animal's flanks and taken from around its kidneys?

    That has the vestiges of archaic human imagination all over it. God looks like a male human being, cock and balls and the whole works? That is evidence of primitive human imagination, not of God

  • @confettibrains Yes, God looks like a male human, as we were created in his image. The sacrifices ares omething that can only be understood by the all-knowing himself.

    It's not evidence of human imagination. These are straight from the Lord's word.

  • @whatswithalltheblack Who the hell are you to claim a god cannot be judged? Anyone may offer a critique of the invisible sky daddy and his zombie Nazarene son and be perfectly valid in doing it. You are like the idiot Islamists who claim Mohammed may never be depicted on pain of death...as though depicting the pedophile would change anything...

  • @Atalatl You can judge God if you like but it would be unwise. It's your eternal soul that will be burdened by your actions. It's up to you but i'd repent immediately.

  • @Protection220 Hell is cool, abot 90 minutes southwest of Detroit, not too far from Ann Arbor. Unfortunately, Satan is no longer in residence, having gone to Bratislava to play pro hockey.

  • @DClayTorosco

    Shit, I thought hell was Detroit.

  • @whatswithalltheblack You believe that, huh? There is an ever expansive invisible place full of unlimited combustion and brimstone that we magically transport to, post-mortum, where a dude with horns pokes you and tortures you for being evil, despite the fact that he himself loves evil. A place that our ever loving god created to burn his beloved children literally forever as punishment for sin that lasted a blink of an eye in comparison. This is your fair and just God. HAH! Bullshit.

  • @Rygads You've summed it up. At least you know what will happen if you don't repent immediately. If there still is time, that is.

  • @whatswithalltheblack Okay, bud, whatever you say in your land of fairy tales and magic spells.

  • I rage quit. I can't argue with you evangelicals if you won't take a basic bio class.

  • there could be microscopic life. but before it can evolve...you eat it

  • It's funny he says that we haven't been able to create new life from as they call it 'matter'. Because I seem to recall in my biology class my professor going over experiments in which scientists have managed to do just that; create organic molecules from the inorganic, and then have these molecules form a 'protocell'.....But if this theory of evolution wasn't real this wouldn't be possible now would it??

  • @MaximusArurealius Apparently you are so deeply misguided by your belief in what is, in all essence, a fairy tale, that you cannot except the truth. You don't believe it is possible for man to create new life, fine, but that doesn't mean that we aren't within years maybe even months of doing just that. Scientists have already created a 'protocell' (a precursor to a true living, reproducing and growing cell) out of inorganic molecules (i.e. molecules that can be found in a rock)....

  • @MW2PeteB11 Also, you have absolutely no right in calling my professor a liar. He is obviously more educated on the subject than both you and I (has his PhD in Biology), which would mean that he generally knows what he is talking about when it comes to the biological world. You have no more right to call him a liar than I do to call your pastor or reverend a liar, which I have not done (as tempting as it may be).

  • @MW2PeteB11 Actually to rephrase my first reply scientists have in fact 'created life' (which I found out after a 5 second Google search). We as a human species have actually managed to create cells from scratch that have the ability to reproduce (replicate). It's amazing how science has advanced in the last few hundred years...Religion on the otherhand, hasn't really advanced much (unless you count the invention of Scientology, that was a pretty big break through for religious beliefs ).

  • Americans.

  • @Xander51 lolz

  • God damn this guy is one of the biggest dickwads I've even seen before.

  • @podoau Maxy is truly a wonder of the vast reaches of human intellect.

    He deserves a serious award for his contributions to biology and philosophy, not to mention he can further advance the sum total of human knowledge with his outstanding theories.

    You really should listen to him, before you sink further into the fallacious pit known as biological 'evolutionary theory'.

    His insight will definitely further our race as a whole.

  • @KingLeonidaz Oh you poor thing, no argument, no substance, no verification of anything just blubbering and crying. KingDingBat, You don't even have a good insulting insult.

    HAR HAR HAR HAR HAR HAR HAR HAR HAR HAR HAR HAR

    A dunce is as a dunce does. hahahahahahahahhaaaa

    Keep the laughter coming dunce boy, keep the laughter coming.

  • @KingLeonidaz ROFL, well said my friend, well said...

  • Oh shit is Maxy still on here ranting?

    LOL

  • @KingLeonidaz A good troll never quits, and religious ones are even worse.

  • @MW2PeteB11 I really cannot tell if he's trolling or if he's serious, he posts with such unflinching conviction.

  • @manknowyourself i have yet to see a narrow minded atheist fool prove anything other than his own self righteous stupidity. as i recall you didnt give me one fact for evolution, and i dont think you can honestly because there isnt any out there. Winning the arguement? lol if you mean being a dumb ass for the duration and resorting to personal insult to justify your own fucked up mentality then i guess you could say so.

  • @SamuelJCir "you didnt give me one fact for evolution, and i dont think you can honestly because there isnt any out there."

    You dont get out much do you.

  • @podoau OH YEAH, I KNOW there's mountains, tons, hills and valleys just chock full of evidence for evolution. It's just that one of you poor dumb evotards must have misplaced it. OH look there it is! Piltdown man, Nebraska man, how are you? HAR HAR HAR

  • @SamuelJCir What kind of evidence towards evolution are you looking for, I'll gladly provide. Let's start with the main idea behind evolution, that natural selection provides the mechanism that drives evolution. Experiments have taken place with bacteria. When a culture was placed in an environment with a plentiful food source and were allowed to reproduce for several generations, no changes in size or fitness of the population were observed; thus evolution did not take place. For trial 2.......

  • @MW2PeteB11 another culture was placed in an environment with a food source that could not support the entire population, thus encouraging competition. The culture was left to reproduce through several generations and low and behold, the bacteria in the second trial exhibited increased levels of fitness and size; thus evolution did occur. This provides evidence for the theory that through the process of natural selection, evolution does take place. In other words, evolution is a FACT OF LIFE.

  • @MW2PeteB11 God created all. Your so called 'science' is a joke.

  • Peanut butter is people!

  • What the fuck am I watching?

  • "The idea that genetic mutation cannot accumulate in a genome over long periods of time, is virtually impossible in a world governed by physical and chemical laws"

    "Creationists are idiots."

  • Max has no idea what he's even reading. LMAO

  • @shitforbrains "Max has no idea what he's even reading" Great argument. Afraid to explain it? HAR HAR HAR HAR HAR

  • Why the fuck do I keep trolling myself...my guess is others who came here did the same :)

  • I have a headache now. I thought ray comforts banana was the worst. Well, maybe it still is lol

  • *Just face palms*

  • Evolution is not about life springing from nothing. It's about existing life forms undergoing subtle changes over millions of years in order to suit their environments.

  • This is damn funny!!!

  • This is ignorance taken to a whole new level.

  • -_-

  • Because, obviously, life being "created" because of energy and light etc (even though matter can't actually be destroyed or created but whatever) is less plausible than a man with magic powers creating people to spend their life worshipping him.

  • why does he think new life forms in a jar of peanut butter? it's just peanut butter, how could new life form in it?! anyone explain this to me

  • This can't be serious. It can't.

  • Do these guys think the "primordial soup" was peanut butter? That would be an interesting discovery.

  • Ohhh I sure will not forget this.. probably not for the reasons he was hoping for though

  • If youre mad you lose.

  • this is the argument... this is what they are saying to descredit evolution lmao... oh my god

  • @TEEPO129

    "this is the argument... this is what they are saying to descredit evolution"

    Many creationists really do think it's that easy to disprove chemical and biological laws and principles, and over 150 years of empirical data.

    And when the scientific community doesn't take their childish endeavors seriously, the creationists scream, "OMG conspiracy!! Tha scientists are hiding tha truth! Conspiracy I tell ya! My proof is flawless and unscientifically-well-founded! derpderpderp"

  • NO SHIT THERE'S NO LIFE IN PEANUT BUTTER. it's a closed environment, AIR TIGHT. Do you think the Earth is a closed environment? of course not! Sunlight, other worldly particles, they all enter through the atmosphere. There's no fucking lid on this planet, let alone a PLASTIC SEAL.

  • The obvious truth is that goat herders living in tents 4000 years ago on a supposedly flat earth at the beginning and center of the universe knew more about life, truth, and the universe than modern day scientists do. Duh. These are the same people who have heart attacks while preaching heatedly in church about the "fallacy of evolution" who are then rushed to the hospital and saved by doctors who treat patients not with prayers, but with medicine created based on the study of evolution.

  • I wasn't aware that peanut butter contained all the building blocks and conditions required to spawn self replicating life.

  • @Rygads Really, you must have taken the wrong bio course, cause at my university we are taught that the inside of the jar of peanut butter is where the universe all began....;p

  • @MW2PeteB11 Lol'd

  • This is hilarious.

  • All life needs oxygen... -_-

  • If your sceptical then check out the biblically archeological work of a man named Ron Wyatt. He has discovered Mt Siani, the Red sea crossing, Noahs Ark, Sodom and Gomorrah and was even lead to the Ark of the Covenant by the Holy Spirit. Hard hearted scoffers were prophesied in the bible so your mocking sarcasm is nothing new and according to the bible dead branches bearing no fruit will be tossed into the fire. Just a heads up. Soften your heart and pay attention before you start stuttering in

  • @N0TS0SUBTLE The Da Vinci Code had some real places and events in it, that doesn't mean it's any less a fictional story. What you are really asking is for us to soften our minds.

  • @N0TS0SUBTLE No man, you got your shit all wrong, it was Indiana Jones who found the Ark of the Covenant, they made a documentary about it; as I recall it was a big hit.

  • If the bible is a fairy tale why then are there Jews today since there are over 400 prophecies in the OT alone which point to a coming Messiah in which only Jesus could have fulfilled. Wouldnt you think the Jews who just made it all up would have seen the Messiah they arbitrarily and seemingly unknowingly concocted? Until scientist can spontaneously generate life from nothing, ill stick to Gods version.

  • @N0TS0SUBTLE Amen SCIENCE WILL NEVER HAVE ALL THE ANSWERS TO THINGS WE CANT SEE.. ITS JUST THERE AND WE HAVE TO ACCEPT IT. ALL WE CAN DO IS PROVIDE THEM WITH THE TRUTH.. IF THERE IGNORANT THEY ll FIND OUT ON JUDGEMENT DAY

  • @1xThreeDaysGrace1x WELL YOU BETTER EXCEPT THAT THERE IS AN INVISIBLE, INTANGIBLE DRAGON LIVING IN MY GARAGE, CAUSE I KNOW HE EXISTS AND THAT'S THE TRUTH, I EVEN WROTE SHIT ABOUT ON PAPER! SO YOU NO FOR A FACT THAT HE MUST BE REAL. AND ONE DAY, THAT DRAGON IS GONNA GET REAL PISSED AND GO ON A RAMPAGE AND ONLY THE ONES WHO BELIEVE IN HIM WILL BE SAFE CAUSE THAT JUST MAKES SENSE. BUT DON'T WORRY, I WROTE DOWN SOME INSTRUCTIONS ON HOW TO LIVE SO THE DRAGON WON'T HURT YOU, JUST GOTTA FOLLOW'EM.

  • @MW2PeteB11 ahhh shit I spelled accept wrong.....damn

  • @N0TS0SUBTLE dude, Google 'Scientists create life', it's really not that hard to educate your mind a little once in a while.

  • @MW2PeteB11 Google 'god created life' Educate yourself you might learn something.

  • It's sad how little people appreciate the infinitesimal odds that created our form of life. To think the amount of random occurrences that occur in non life matter in just Earth alone is a big enough sample size to disprove our birth cheapens our existence.

  • I hope the 4807 likes are just people being sarcastic

  • It's astonishing how ignorant Christians sometimes are. While there's nothing wrong with not knowing much about science per se, to go on like you do know when everything you say shows otherwise is an invitation to ridicule. I almost feel sympathetic embarrassment for these people.

  • Two things are infinite.

    the universe and stupidity.

  • @1xThreeDaysGrace1x Science has never and will never claim to know all the answers. That is the point of since, to push on into the unknown and try to explain it. Only the religious believe that science thinks it can solve all the questions.

    This is how I see religion, someone can't believe in a system that doesn't hold the answers to everything they want to know so they make up some random shit that gives them a way to explain everything.

    So they can be like, "What did that?" answer: GOD!!!!

  • @MW2PeteB11 "Only the religious believe that science thinks it can solve all the questions" Actually that an atheist concept. Look it up under materialism. Everything is knowable.

    SCHOOLED

  • @MaximusArurealius Materialism

    From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

    In philosophy, the theory of materialism holds that the only thing that exists is matter or energy; that all things are composed of material and all phenomena (including consciousness) are the result of material interactions. In other words, matter is the only substance, and reality is identical with the actually occurring states of energy and matter.

    So where exactly does this say science thinks it can solve all the answers?

  • swab that shit and put it in a pantery dish and tell me theres no fucking bacteria

  • PUBLIC NOTE: MaximusArurealius DON'T UNDERSTAND SARCASM!

    The evidence :''Here's what MrThaPatrick said to the whole comment section:"No we are the idiots who get pwnd all the time by the mighty max and jack!!"

    HAR HAR HAR

    SELF-PWNING AT ITS FINEST''

    Way to go max, how many times now you proved to everyone you don't understand sarcasm?

    Or are you under the impression some one really believes I meant that to be serious?You do? Ah you'er stupidity really knows no boundary's!

    Thanks for the fun

  • @MaximusArurealius Yo max you don't have Youtube celebrity you have notoriety, there is a clear difference between the two (though honestly you probably don't no what it is).

  • @MW2PeteB11 Don't worry about it. You wouldn't be able to explain it anyway.

  • @MaximusArurealius At least someone here makes some sense and has some intelligence. Good for you sir. Eternity and bliss for us both.

  • @whatswithalltheblack If you think max makes sense your are either psychotic or a sock of max's. Max hasn't made any sense in his entire time on YouTube.

  • @DClayTorosco He's the most sensical one on this page. The only other that I've seen make sense here is poetgb.

  • Is this guy actually F***ing serious? Peanut butter! Actually, that peanut butter is intelligent, compared to the nutjob whose hand it is in

  • @1stClassSoldier Do you realize what you're saying by calling God a liar? The Bible says it clearly, ' LET GOD BE TRUE,BUT EVERY MAN A LIAR '. The Bible says ' THE DEVIL IS A LIAR AND THE FATHER OF IT '. You are mixed up.The Bible says ' WOE TO THEM THAT CALL EVIL GOOD AND GOOD EVIL '. God always speaks the truth.The Bible is God's Word in written form.God speaks to us through His Word.Jesus said ' I AM THE WAY,THE TRUTH,AND THE LIFE '. God is the highest Authority.Your authority is below

  • @Urfullobull I don't know the reason behind your harsh statements against God,but to call God evil,now that's blasphemy.You are so out of line that it is pathetic.Do you think for one second you can get away with charging God and judging God? You don't even realize I'm trying to help you,to persuade you to repent and come to the knowledge of the truth.There's a saying, 'never bite the hand that feeds you', I am feeding you the truth,but you reject it.If you remain in your unbelief,you will fall

  • Wow. What a crock of shit. LOL

  • @confettibrains

    "And why do you think the DNA molecule is static and not subject to same chemical rules like any other polymere is?"

    All chemicals, including DNA, are subject to chemical laws. However, the point to be emphasized is that the *genetic code* - that is, its mapping pattern of codons --> amino acid is not simply the result of chemical laws. E.g., there is no chemical law that states ATG must encode methionine. That is the point.

  • If evolution (the belief that mankind descended from inorganic molecules) is true, then we should be able to verify it by means of independent testing in lab controlled environments. Testing is, after all, the basis of scientific knowledge. Since no such experiment exists, then the grand claim of evolution is pure speculation only...not a scientific theory...and no one ought to believe it to be scientific.

  • @sbgtrading "Since no such experiment exists" is not equivalent to "Since I can't be bothered to do any research and examine the experiments that have in fact been done"

    speciation has been observed in the lab. look up "drosophilia evolution"

  • @sbgtrading

    You are confusing evolution with abiogenesis. You dumb shit.

    How do you explain AB resistance without using evolution theory?

    btw...AB resistance is observed daily in any hospital.

  • @transtlantic abiogenesis is related to broad scale evolution. Broad scale evolution is the alternative to a supernatural creation they are mutually exclusive in their full scale. Therefore, abiogenesis is required for broad scale evolution.

  • @transtlantic (4) If the eyes had evolved in this way, where did our eye-lids come from, and the tear factor to protect our eyes from dirt and dust? Explain these factors.

  • @sethblatt All it took to find out was a quick google search:

    1 photosensitive cell

    2 aggregates of pigment cells without a nerve

    3 an optic nerve surrounded by pigment cells and covered by translucent skin

    4 pigment cells forming a small depression

    5 pigment cells forming a deeper depression

    6 the skin over the depression taking a lens shape

    7 muscles allowing the lens to adjust

    All of these steps are known to be viable because all exist in animals living today.

    -TalkOrigins.