@LCPStud If there are any passengers on board, it would be impossible for them to sue NASA for they will be dead! And be rational! No one would be willing to die for a plane crash test! Think before you say anything
"plane crash test" ?? That's just an excuse, they just want to see a plane crashing and exploding on their very eyes..
And I'm amazed on how STUPID people are commenting on this video. If it's a crash test why would they put PASSENGERS inside a plane that they know it will used for a crash testing? MORONS! Read the description!
It was perfectly genuine. The plane was flown by remote control and was intended to test the safety benefits of a modified aviation fuel. The fuel had an additive that made it harder to ignite. This additive was removed en-route to the engines. The idea was that passengers can survive an exploding engine but can't survive an exploding fuel tank. Indeed, the main fuel tank within the plane did not explode, only the wing tanks ignited. The accident would have been survivable.
Just like a crazy penguin that could fly on fire and crashed and then just shattered.(just saying) In fact it's as if the plane wanted to die (again just saying)
They were testing a fuel which was supposed to resist igniting. I don't remember the details. The plane landed different then they wanted but still hit the razors on the ground that were supposed to slash open the fuel tanks. The test as you can see proved the fuel did not produce the desired results. Cameras and test dummies were in the plane. The inside view is unnerving because it shows the flames blasting into the cabin torching the dummies before the plane comes to a stop.
@SpaceRogue80 It produced surprisingly good results. Using standard aviation fuel, this would not be a survivable accident. Using this ignition-resistant fuel, maybe a third of the passengers would have walked away with minor injuries. (The fuel had an additive that made it harder to ignite. The additive was filtered out as the fuel was passed into the engines.) It wasn't an ideal result and it was a PR disaster, but it did prove the concept valid.
Don't you people get it?! It was George W. Bush's fault the plane crashed. He was flying the plane just prior to the accident and bailed out to save his life. Just like how he was responsible for 9/11 and the oil rig explosion in the Gulf of Mexico. We all know George swam to the bottom of the Gulf with a hacksaw and cut the drill pipe. I think W. had something to do with the Lindbergh kidnapping too. I just love tweaking the liberals. No disrespect to those who lost their lives! God bless'em.
It was a test of a new fuel formula ... The fuel had additives that were supposed to keep it from vaporizing ... The test went tragically, and expensively, wrong when the remote controller misjudged a couple of factors ... the metal structures were supposed to tear the wings open in a controlled manner but the plane landed in a configuration that allowed the fuel to vaporize anyway .... Nobody was hurt, except the tavpayers.
man some people have cool jobs. oh hey lets crash a plane today, and watch it blow up n shit. sure maybe they did more than just that but come on how cool of a job would that be.
Bullshit. It was a flight test in 1984. NASA were testing new fuels. You can see that the aircraft hits the ground and then impacts with "cutters" designed to ensure the fuel tanks were split and to ensure a controlled combustion of the fuel onboard.
There were NO passengers on board. Why do you thnk the video has a NASA symbol at the start of it? The 707 was radio controlled. It was on it's way to the scrap yard and NASA used it to test fuel additives that were designed to minimise fire post crash.
The fireball you see is because the plane is full of fuel (without fuel the experiment would have been useless) and because when the plane crashed on its' belly, its' engine impacted with the "cutters" (that are visible on the right of the screen at 0:12) instead of the wing only impacting with the cutters.
Exactly. No doubt it's a test. Whenever you conduct crash tests, you run the worst possible scenarios, in this case, loaded with fuel and headed straight for sharp, wing-cutting obstacles. I've seen this video many times before, and it's very famous. Clearly a test. I thought bustaphatty was joking, but, amazingly, he seems to actually believe his own story. Wow.
waste of a decent working plane i wish i had one of those babys to work on and i am an airccraft machanic the strongest of the ne samas councile in swenbabway
What are u talking about?! This was a controlled test with not a single human passenger, just crash test dummies! How could any passengers need medical assistance if there were no passengers in the first place?!
This was a remote controlled test for NASA testing the ignitability of a new experimental jetfuel. The plane was crashed on purpose and its wings sliced with large metal "teeth". It took off and "landed" by remote control by a real experienced pilot. Obviously, no one was inside but a couple hundred dummies.
you people are fucking stupid! NO-ONE WAS IN THE PLANE ITS RADIO CONTROLLED AS ITS A TEST TO SEE WHAT WILL HAPPEN WITH THE NEW FUEL THE PLANES ARE USING!! FUCKING HELL SOME PEOPLE ARE FUCKING STUPID!
No this was a NASA test. The pilot really screwed it up too. He was suppose to fly directly into the wall but ht hit wing low and rolled the plane. He'd never flown an RC plane before (he was an airline pilot). However, the test proved that the gell type fuel did not reduce burning in an accident.
True, they wanted to crash this landing, which is why the runway had these huge teethed ramps in order to rip the planed fuel tanks apart upon touch down, still the fireball was sufficient evidence that the gel type fuel wasn't sufficiently gelatinous.
It's a conundrum, how to make a fuel that will burn in the engines, but NOT upon impact, the only plane managing that is the SR-71 if I recall, but that fuel was extremely expensive.
I wonder if Diesel or other heavy fuels might be better...
fink some1 needs shaggin'! relief abit ov that pent up frustration! No need 2 get on ur high horse, It was only a joke pal! perhaps your humour died in the video's subject along with the dummies?
maybe the plane costs much money and you think its wasting of money, but if you wont test maybe 300 people will die next flight, lifes aren't for sale..
where's the rest of the video to show the results.... watch the other video where it tells you that, no engine parts were damaged from burning fuel or oil.
I have seen shows on Discovery channel about testing of new fuels for airliners that doesn't create a giant mist and explode if the tanks are ruptured during a crash. I think this was one of the tests.
nah....no 10 million nothing...just a few hundred grand...an airplane that woulda otherwise been dismanteled a bit slower and colder than that, and lots of conclusions on fire related aspects. Maybe the project cost millions, but the plane wasn´t the most expensive part for sure. That´s why they didn´t use a brand new 777
Sigh! This test was years.... no actually decades before 9/11.
It was to test an additive in the fuel to prevent the fireball that consumes planes so quickly after a serious crash. It didn't go as well as was hoped. In fact, it failed miserably. The idea was to give people more of a chance to escape a serious plane crash by giving them more time to get out.
No, not fake. They were actually testing a new fuel that was supposed to not create such a large fireball during a plane crash. It didn't work. There are some great shots of this on NASA's Dryden (sp?) web site, including some still shots of inside the plane during the test.
17 yards is pusseh. I got struck in the middle finger while i was flicking off a storm. I thought that hurt, so i told the storm to suck on my hairy ballz. couple secondds later, twin bolts of lightning zapped my boys clean off. that sucked. too bad i won't be able to have kids.
oh, and if you don't repaste this on 10 more videos it will happen to you. unless you're female, then it will be your breasts.
this was a trst to see the different fuel witch one was better and it proved that one of them left the cabin inside unharmed and passenges unharmed. It's not a fireball or crash!
What they were doing here was trying to demonstrate a new fuel mixture and tank design that would provide less fire risk in a crash. The jet was remote controlled into a belly landing so a steel cutting edge on the ground would shear through a wing tank. Unfortunately the cutter went straight through a running turbine engine and all hell broke loose.
wow..... this conversation is about the video of the remote controlled plane crash test, not america's fincial problems. "GET A FUCKING CLUE,JACKASS!"
NO thats what people say when fucktards like u dont know whts going on and try to get into a conversation that they dont belong in........so piss off.
what is your problem with america? someones got to do research. is your country one that does it? or one that benifits from it and lets everyone else do it?
did they died?
kiashadowwave 3 months ago
/watch?v=RadRJ7VGocc
654321234567890 5 months ago
What did they learn? Jet fuel is flammable?
taylorgpa 5 months ago 8
This proves that planes can crash. Well great spending I guess they didnt think about the 1 trillion dollar debt problem at the time.
Dominoes282 6 months ago
@LCPStud If there are any passengers on board, it would be impossible for them to sue NASA for they will be dead! And be rational! No one would be willing to die for a plane crash test! Think before you say anything
jiyonasu0503 6 months ago
"plane crash test" ?? That's just an excuse, they just want to see a plane crashing and exploding on their very eyes..
And I'm amazed on how STUPID people are commenting on this video. If it's a crash test why would they put PASSENGERS inside a plane that they know it will used for a crash testing? MORONS! Read the description!
jiyonasu0503 6 months ago
I hope the passengers sued NASA for deliberately crashing the plane they were on. Pretty messed up if you ask me?
LCPStud 6 months ago
And what they have learned from this "crash test" ???
marcolino54321 7 months ago
Now who in their right mind would ruin a perfectly good 707?
B1Studios 8 months ago
It was perfectly genuine. The plane was flown by remote control and was intended to test the safety benefits of a modified aviation fuel. The fuel had an additive that made it harder to ignite. This additive was removed en-route to the engines. The idea was that passengers can survive an exploding engine but can't survive an exploding fuel tank. Indeed, the main fuel tank within the plane did not explode, only the wing tanks ignited. The accident would have been survivable.
2206411411 9 months ago
Where...are...my...FUCKING MARSHMELLOWS!!!
HAZARDAR3 9 months ago
THAT WAS SO FAKE!!!!!
hammytj10 10 months ago
Was a test. Not fake.
MetalSights 9 months ago
Just like a crazy penguin that could fly on fire and crashed and then just shattered.(just saying) In fact it's as if the plane wanted to die (again just saying)
CeilingFans4UrLife 10 months ago
They were testing a fuel which was supposed to resist igniting. I don't remember the details. The plane landed different then they wanted but still hit the razors on the ground that were supposed to slash open the fuel tanks. The test as you can see proved the fuel did not produce the desired results. Cameras and test dummies were in the plane. The inside view is unnerving because it shows the flames blasting into the cabin torching the dummies before the plane comes to a stop.
SpaceRogue80 11 months ago
@SpaceRogue80 It produced surprisingly good results. Using standard aviation fuel, this would not be a survivable accident. Using this ignition-resistant fuel, maybe a third of the passengers would have walked away with minor injuries. (The fuel had an additive that made it harder to ignite. The additive was filtered out as the fuel was passed into the engines.) It wasn't an ideal result and it was a PR disaster, but it did prove the concept valid.
2206411411 9 months ago
Is the plane going to be okay?
SuperIuminal 1 year ago
Don't you people get it?! It was George W. Bush's fault the plane crashed. He was flying the plane just prior to the accident and bailed out to save his life. Just like how he was responsible for 9/11 and the oil rig explosion in the Gulf of Mexico. We all know George swam to the bottom of the Gulf with a hacksaw and cut the drill pipe. I think W. had something to do with the Lindbergh kidnapping too. I just love tweaking the liberals. No disrespect to those who lost their lives! God bless'em.
diggerHR 1 year ago 3
For sale:
Romote Controlled Boeing 707
Damage: leaking nose wheel brake, new engines low time
$2,500,000
Helicopterpilot16 1 year ago
To sale:
Nasa plane,
light damage
$:2500
georgalbert 1 year ago
thatd be the funniest job. to get paid to crash a plane without the risk of anyone getting hurt
CrazyFinnishKid 1 year ago
Wonder what the Blue Book value on that is now...
krayzeejojo 1 year ago
a PERFECT landing! XD
bobmclightning 1 year ago
They probably blew up alot of old passenger jets so they could get 911 to work out the way it did.
TheExeter 1 year ago
@TheExeter haha stupid
vidman520 1 year ago
all 651 passengers died, except for the pilot who was drinking in the terminal back in california
killgroy 1 year ago 5
It was a test of a new fuel formula ... The fuel had additives that were supposed to keep it from vaporizing ... The test went tragically, and expensively, wrong when the remote controller misjudged a couple of factors ... the metal structures were supposed to tear the wings open in a controlled manner but the plane landed in a configuration that allowed the fuel to vaporize anyway .... Nobody was hurt, except the tavpayers.
hammerogod 1 year ago
... yet the crashes on GTA seem soo fake.
AnthraxByEmail09 1 year ago
WHAT ? no comments about aliens and / or UFO's did it ?!? did all the weirdos and retards abandonned fucking Joe Tsjube ?!? oh no !
BOYCOT4YT 1 year ago
Broken.
jimmywrangles 1 year ago
best... job... EVAR!
okboy100 1 year ago
I remember this. It was actually a test of a new kind of fuel designed to not explode as you see it there.
jameszerukjr 1 year ago
@HereIsJesus we all know the answer.
MooseHunter911 1 year ago
man some people have cool jobs. oh hey lets crash a plane today, and watch it blow up n shit. sure maybe they did more than just that but come on how cool of a job would that be.
stonedsmurfz 1 year ago
this wasn't suppose to happend it had to make asmooth belly land and then go on fire
DataC0llect0r 1 year ago
something inside must exploded and caught fire plus it was scratching the motors and you could see some stuff went into the motor...
pyromaanisi 1 year ago
@pyromaanisi Wonder what motor on a jet?
Dmetrey437 1 year ago
oh thats reassuring....
j69d 1 year ago
I remember seeing this on TV a long time ago. Maybe on Ripley's Believe It or Not
HarryHydro 1 year ago
That plane crash in die hard 2 wasn't that far off.
Racecarlock 2 years ago
Is "NASA Plane Crash Test" not clear enough for some of you imbeciles?
awachtel 2 years ago 5
hego is right. i saw it on tv ages ago... they were testing the fuels n how the plane would burn. that plane was full of dummies
floydy22 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
it was prob one of the 9/11 planes they dont want you to know about
bustaphatty 2 years ago
You are the King Retard.
gabesprofile 2 years ago 2
This comment has received too many negative votes show
both pilots died
bustaphatty 2 years ago
Bullshit. It was a flight test in 1984. NASA were testing new fuels. You can see that the aircraft hits the ground and then impacts with "cutters" designed to ensure the fuel tanks were split and to ensure a controlled combustion of the fuel onboard.
Hego1983 2 years ago 3
This comment has received too many negative votes show
@Hego1983 bullshit, if they where crashing the plane on purpose why would they load it with fuel. all 300 passengers died, r.i.p
bustaphatty 2 years ago
There were NO passengers on board. Why do you thnk the video has a NASA symbol at the start of it? The 707 was radio controlled. It was on it's way to the scrap yard and NASA used it to test fuel additives that were designed to minimise fire post crash.
Hego1983 2 years ago 6
The fireball you see is because the plane is full of fuel (without fuel the experiment would have been useless) and because when the plane crashed on its' belly, its' engine impacted with the "cutters" (that are visible on the right of the screen at 0:12) instead of the wing only impacting with the cutters.
Hego1983 2 years ago 7
Exactly. No doubt it's a test. Whenever you conduct crash tests, you run the worst possible scenarios, in this case, loaded with fuel and headed straight for sharp, wing-cutting obstacles. I've seen this video many times before, and it's very famous. Clearly a test. I thought bustaphatty was joking, but, amazingly, he seems to actually believe his own story. Wow.
spinalTapSoundGuy 2 years ago
Your a Moron. was a NASA Fuel Coagulant Test dipshit. Lol
drumdude46 2 years ago
@drumdude46 If you are going to call someone a moron...Learn how to SPELL! You're a moron.
hitman748 1 year ago
i ain't had no book lernin' you idat i cun spel reel guuud how darr yu ensultt 'ma spillin' abilaty's 'ya MORE-ON! Lol
drumdude46 1 year ago
waste of a decent working plane i wish i had one of those babys to work on and i am an airccraft machanic the strongest of the ne samas councile in swenbabway
caloom1991 2 years ago
Oooooo listen to Caloom....! Fucking show off ;)
Mate i know what you mean, what a waste of money, time and effort....!
You in the RAF then?
Im in the process of joining the Marines mate..!
magnumforce1983 2 years ago
HUGE FIRETRANGLE :D
SimiZ15 2 years ago
i hate when i watch a video and all the comments are from a bunch of know it all pricks
buickgrandnatty 2 years ago
Oh srry for knowing stuff moron
new129 2 years ago 2
This comment has received too many negative votes show
nasa is retarded
panzertank15 2 years ago
it looks like a really good animation lol
BlingBlingStudios 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
All passengers survived, with three taken to hospital for treatment of minor burns.
peerless77 2 years ago
What are u talking about?! This was a controlled test with not a single human passenger, just crash test dummies! How could any passengers need medical assistance if there were no passengers in the first place?!
banger1454 2 years ago 41
Thank god someone who knows what their talking about
new129 2 years ago
Maybe peerless is schizophrenic?
Patriotfrosh15 2 years ago
@banger1454 a woman crash test dummy. ZING!!
AlphaGeese 1 year ago
what r u cnn!?!?!?!?
fuck!
Yourvideosucks09 2 years ago
stupid....it was a test Crash landing of NASA. without peonles onboard. The airplane was remotecontrolled.
Infomation first, bevor talking stupid.
1stSkyhawk 2 years ago 3
This was a remote controlled test for NASA testing the ignitability of a new experimental jetfuel. The plane was crashed on purpose and its wings sliced with large metal "teeth". It took off and "landed" by remote control by a real experienced pilot. Obviously, no one was inside but a couple hundred dummies.
sk8drumdie0116 2 years ago 3
The flammability was confirmed I would say...
ronprivat 2 years ago 6
a few million tax dollars later and we know that crashing planes is a bad idea... maybe we could have built a wall on the mexican boarder?
mattie5960 2 years ago 4
ha ha so true
david1965af 2 years ago 2
Hmm, I want to get paid to destroy things... :(
MusicDemonWCIII 2 years ago 5
you people are fucking stupid! NO-ONE WAS IN THE PLANE ITS RADIO CONTROLLED AS ITS A TEST TO SEE WHAT WILL HAPPEN WITH THE NEW FUEL THE PLANES ARE USING!! FUCKING HELL SOME PEOPLE ARE FUCKING STUPID!
royal1marines 2 years ago 3
This comment has received too many negative votes show
uh uh. it was filled with people.
RevDrFaux 2 years ago
no it wasnt. This whas a test for NASA, which is down the line, a puzzle piece for 9/11.
1053857 2 years ago
No this was a NASA test. The pilot really screwed it up too. He was suppose to fly directly into the wall but ht hit wing low and rolled the plane. He'd never flown an RC plane before (he was an airline pilot). However, the test proved that the gell type fuel did not reduce burning in an accident.
RobertGary1 2 years ago
True, they wanted to crash this landing, which is why the runway had these huge teethed ramps in order to rip the planed fuel tanks apart upon touch down, still the fireball was sufficient evidence that the gel type fuel wasn't sufficiently gelatinous.
It's a conundrum, how to make a fuel that will burn in the engines, but NOT upon impact, the only plane managing that is the SR-71 if I recall, but that fuel was extremely expensive.
I wonder if Diesel or other heavy fuels might be better...
AGrandt 2 years ago
gawd , a youtube video of a youtube video. comon stop reposting videos that have been seen a trillion times.
Skurgefaust 2 years ago 2
how did it fly?
radio control?
was it launched?
cubosensaj 2 years ago
"how did it fly?"
With aerodynamics and thrust
"radio control?"
Yep.
"was it launched? "
Nope.
AGrandt 2 years ago
i just wanted t know that
cubosensaj 2 years ago
The plane was piloted by remote control, and if I recall it took off like any other plane.
Landing is not easy...
AGrandt 2 years ago
RIP!
kbuwerks 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
u fucking retard
mbmjdudes 2 years ago
I was not being humorous, some people use the acronym "RTP" as a form of respect not a joke. Your commit is out of line...mbmjdudes.
kbuwerks 2 years ago 2
it was a test u know
666zeon666 2 years ago
no one was on it
lisamoret1 2 years ago
I saw this on TLC. They were testing these things that would shear off the wings so they could save the fuelsalge as much as possible. It worked.
delamoursbassace 3 years ago
the test was TEST the new fuel that they thought would be harder to ignite during a fuel tank rupture
ManingGi 3 years ago
Didnt this test help them make a fuel that gells up when exposed or something
jordanhoffman 3 years ago
This was actually a test for a fuel additive that was designed to help avoid a fireball on impact. Obviously the test was deemed a failure.
wanabeepilot 3 years ago 4
well i think the test went quite well huh guys?
rumsaudomyandlash 3 years ago 24
hahahahahahahahahahahahaha
kornamo 3 years ago
LOL stupid much?
whaffles1688 3 years ago
fink some1 needs shaggin'! relief abit ov that pent up frustration! No need 2 get on ur high horse, It was only a joke pal! perhaps your humour died in the video's subject along with the dummies?
pello1978 3 years ago
TAXI !
pello1978 3 years ago
Oh ok, you'd rather fly in an untested aircraft then? You'd get a much closer, first-0hand look at a plane crash in that case.
SilentoGamer 3 years ago
fake hats a test crash from NASA
majo1424 3 years ago
fake
liveitup2020 3 years ago
not fake! actually it wuz a crash test
catwithhotfish 3 years ago
Oh ok, you'd rather fly in an untested aircraft then? You'd get a much closer, first-0hand look at a plane crash in that case.
SilentoGamer 3 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
i can cos im jesus
poo123mongoosepancak 3 years ago
burn in hell
ShenmueCampaign 3 years ago
poor 707 sad to see her leave the world in flames.
UAL4ever 3 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
plane go bye bye!
jamesy0012 3 years ago 2
cool
halo3isawsome321 3 years ago
yeah like thx that the engine parts arent damage...fuck the fucking engineparts dude !!
aikidoka20 3 years ago
maybe the plane costs much money and you think its wasting of money, but if you wont test maybe 300 people will die next flight, lifes aren't for sale..
jstyloo 3 years ago
a crash test.
jimmyxx3 3 years ago 2
where's the rest of the video to show the results.... watch the other video where it tells you that, no engine parts were damaged from burning fuel or oil.
ronniboe 3 years ago
'mr. president here we have ground-breaking technology in plane crash safety."
**goes up in huge fireball
lol wtf the fire so random
forbasketballonly 3 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
LOL WOW MOTHER FUCKER FAKE!!!!
supernintendokidfuck 3 years ago
now thats a plane fire-drift xD
NeOVidas 3 years ago
one of the funnest jobs ever
Fall3nSoul21 3 years ago 18
Lol, good one xD
GeneralAnimator 3 years ago
It's not fake, they were testing new feuls to see if they could make a less combustable one that wouldnt egnite as easily on impact. DUUUUHHHH
samuria1952 4 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
fake ass
RealMovieManjaroStar 4 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
STUPID!!!
Jaykaybee 4 years ago
Its a test asshole
Jagermeister196 3 years ago 3
i'm gald it was a test because that would have sucked big time
Jimmy9554 4 years ago
Wtf how could u b horny from this???
hardyboy1654 4 years ago 3
"Flight is the safest way to travel"...lol
westcoastkid94 4 years ago
nice, i do love a good fire ball lol, great way to wake you up on a saturday morning lol
bangerracer33 4 years ago
I have seen shows on Discovery channel about testing of new fuels for airliners that doesn't create a giant mist and explode if the tanks are ruptured during a crash. I think this was one of the tests.
outindast 4 years ago
how do they manage to test that? was there a pilot who ejects or sumthing :S
WADEYDUD69 4 years ago
mb it's r/c
xlqex 4 years ago
a what...10 million dollar r/c???
rich mans toy...
666excorsist666 4 years ago 2
yeah, well a 10 million dollar remote-controlled plane, or a 10 million dollar plane + pilot's life. I'd go for the remote-controlled one.
xlqex 4 years ago
nah....no 10 million nothing...just a few hundred grand...an airplane that woulda otherwise been dismanteled a bit slower and colder than that, and lots of conclusions on fire related aspects. Maybe the project cost millions, but the plane wasn´t the most expensive part for sure. That´s why they didn´t use a brand new 777
flchange 4 years ago
It's remote controlled.. not joking.. this was on Discovery channel years ago.
jmr604 4 years ago
wow
Amanda2546 4 years ago
I find it funny how so many of these people are trash talking America but know NOTHING about it. Wtf.
phoenix847 4 years ago
NIIIIIICE
speedofsound95 4 years ago
FAKE!
jellosoup 4 years ago
that was gay
neeheeheerichee 4 years ago
is this computer generated?
serpent71 4 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
not fake. this was tested for the invesitgation of the plane that crashed into the pentagon on 9/11
TheBsEr 4 years ago
Wow, you're a blithering idiot.
LaugnaSeca 4 years ago 2
Sigh! This test was years.... no actually decades before 9/11.
It was to test an additive in the fuel to prevent the fireball that consumes planes so quickly after a serious crash. It didn't go as well as was hoped. In fact, it failed miserably. The idea was to give people more of a chance to escape a serious plane crash by giving them more time to get out.
tbd1000 4 years ago 2
Agreed
Crashsilumator26343 3 years ago
TheBsEr you are completely a dumbass this was to test a fuel and it was made in 1984
Crashsilumator26343 3 years ago
man tahts a test
eppesuig75 4 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
fake
Thief1337 4 years ago
No, not fake. They were actually testing a new fuel that was supposed to not create such a large fireball during a plane crash. It didn't work. There are some great shots of this on NASA's Dryden (sp?) web site, including some still shots of inside the plane during the test.
tbd1000 4 years ago 3
I was just tired. I know it's no fake. :D
Thief1337 4 years ago
ehheheh YOURe WELCOME
heynice 4 years ago
Fuk guy MY TAX burning. soo dat is why govenment takez TAX.
evildeath3ever 4 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
17 yards is pusseh. I got struck in the middle finger while i was flicking off a storm. I thought that hurt, so i told the storm to suck on my hairy ballz. couple secondds later, twin bolts of lightning zapped my boys clean off. that sucked. too bad i won't be able to have kids.
oh, and if you don't repaste this on 10 more videos it will happen to you. unless you're female, then it will be your breasts.
cubswillwinin07 4 years ago
dang...
yoshiguy5 4 years ago
for real gore check out crash vid by Sanovskiy
ghodium 4 years ago
Fire gives me an erection
Rbickert 4 years ago
why do people insist on having a go at each other. Nice video. Without these tests, science would not advance.
kazzyg4408 4 years ago
LMFAO
great
pazakka 4 years ago
I'm kinda horny from this to
Rain2638 4 years ago
You guys are all retards just like Tim.
cruddneck 4 years ago
this was a trst to see the different fuel witch one was better and it proved that one of them left the cabin inside unharmed and passenges unharmed. It's not a fireball or crash!
drummer200796 4 years ago
no,it was full of children from Iowa
ww2footage 4 years ago
it was on remote control for fuel test to find out wich fuel is the best of worse
SpetsnazRUS 4 years ago
read satweavers comment
ChallengerGuy22 4 years ago
omg wat iz wrong wit them?
they r retarted they dont how to land a plane
lmao! haha
newjersey8 4 years ago
satweavers is right
FATTYWANNAc0oKiE 4 years ago
nasa test?
aviationvidsDOTcom 4 years ago
so when do they let out those little yellow slide things for the passangers to get out of the plane (after removing all high heeled shoes of course!)
Scr33nag3r 4 years ago
funny how yall get so amped up over a simple video.
dizzastrpiece 4 years ago
That plane was from NASA They crash test it to see what would happens if it would hit a car or something like a wall.
putfit15 4 years ago
whoa, that is awesome.
SethOlson1992 4 years ago
What they were doing here was trying to demonstrate a new fuel mixture and tank design that would provide less fire risk in a crash. The jet was remote controlled into a belly landing so a steel cutting edge on the ground would shear through a wing tank. Unfortunately the cutter went straight through a running turbine engine and all hell broke loose.
satweavers 4 years ago
Drunken pilot? :P
lune66 4 years ago
THERE WAS PLANES IN 9/11 stupid.....Well,not in the Pentagon,they only released a 5 frame video of a explosion....-.-
Shack11 4 years ago
What the hell r u talking about?!?!?!?!?!........this whole conversation is on wheather the U.S. is in debt...GET A FUCKING CLUE, JACKASS!
Evn6 4 years ago
wow..... this conversation is about the video of the remote controlled plane crash test, not america's fincial problems. "GET A FUCKING CLUE,JACKASS!"
SCMugen 4 years ago 2
Piss off.
Evn6 4 years ago
Nice intellectual reply, that's what ignorant people generally do when confronted and proven wrong.
SCMugen 4 years ago
NO thats what people say when fucktards like u dont know whts going on and try to get into a conversation that they dont belong in........so piss off.
Evn6 4 years ago
there WERE planes
frozenpxl 4 years ago
ur a dickhead, they have videos of planes crashing into the towers.
titsmcgee852 4 years ago
sexy
ballinbahamasss 4 years ago
it cost $12 million to destroy it
titsmcgee852 4 years ago
No not really, fucktard........
Evn6 4 years ago
what is your problem with america? someones got to do research. is your country one that does it? or one that benifits from it and lets everyone else do it?
Nyriko 4 years ago