The Air Force used recycled CH-53D's for Pave Low's. Tail rotor stands straight in the air, no 20 degree tilt. Don't be confused the Pave Low fleet was made up of used CH-53D's from the Marine Corps. They were stripped to the frame; still bad ass! Used many CH-53E parts!
This is not a CH-53. @.30 you can clearly see the nose extension and radome which is exclusive to the Air Force "MH" Pave Low that retired in 2008. Listen to what Stickmanfe is saying. We are both veterans of this aircraft.
I just had two of these fly over my high school today when I was outside for gym. You could hear the rotorwash from like 8 miles away, this things are epic
@zvmk yeah I have a cousin in the marines that works on helicopters and he said the apache and the blackhawks are the 2 helicopters that malfunction a lot
@wrs8574 The MH-53s in the video were MH-53Ms, not Js. This video was shot in Balad, Iraq around 2005. The only Pave Lows we had deployed to Iraq at that time were the Ms. The Js stayed at Hurlburt and Kirtland for local training only.
seen one of those land on my ship.. that sucker was a monster.. 6 blades and all those ponies..... we normally carrieed ch-46 seaknights.. some bad mamma jamma's too .. marines have all the fun
UH-60 is a good helicopter and so is the CH-53 remember Sikorsky has made both of these helicopters. The Different roles in different helicopters vary.. UH-60 has its roles and CH-53 has its roles as well.
yea man they are the best ever made and in 2011 they are coming out with the CH-53k wich will have 3 engines in it with 3000 hp each, ITS GONNA BE SWEEEEEEETTTTT!!!!
Yah, Ive been trying to get on that project for the past year. Its going on in WPB, FL. I would hope they have a little more horses than 3k. The E models engines are rated @ 4380.
2 Engines, 6 Blades, Pave Package up Front W/2 Aux. Fuel tanks on the side! Its a pavelow! This is coming from an x mh-53 crew chief. You don't forget them!
My 2 cents :-) When I was in the 1st gulf war I was on "d" models back then. We had a small detachment of RH-53's with us that was detached from a reservist base... it was essentially a CH-53d with a refueling probe and utility hoist and drop tanks. Thats what they look like to me.
Anybody who says any variation of a CH-53 is garage is just a stupid F#*K
Marineair21 1 month ago
The Air Force used recycled CH-53D's for Pave Low's. Tail rotor stands straight in the air, no 20 degree tilt. Don't be confused the Pave Low fleet was made up of used CH-53D's from the Marine Corps. They were stripped to the frame; still bad ass! Used many CH-53E parts!
Marineair21 1 month ago
This is not a CH-53. @.30 you can clearly see the nose extension and radome which is exclusive to the Air Force "MH" Pave Low that retired in 2008. Listen to what Stickmanfe is saying. We are both veterans of this aircraft.
hcoptertx 5 months ago
I just had two of these fly over my high school today when I was outside for gym. You could hear the rotorwash from like 8 miles away, this things are epic
xgeneralzimx 9 months ago
@zvmk yeah I have a cousin in the marines that works on helicopters and he said the apache and the blackhawks are the 2 helicopters that malfunction a lot
war159753 1 year ago
if u asked somebody what a CH-53 was some people would look at u you like your crazy but when u say a pavelow they know all about it
war159753 1 year ago
@zvmk the CH-53 Pave Low is possibly the greatest helicopter ever...maybe along wih the AH-64 Apache
not your little bitchy Black Cock
VVilliegie 2 years ago
@VVilliegie
The CH-53 is a Super Sea Stallion.
The MH-53J is a Pave Low.
wrs8574 1 year ago
@wrs8574 The MH-53s in the video were MH-53Ms, not Js. This video was shot in Balad, Iraq around 2005. The only Pave Lows we had deployed to Iraq at that time were the Ms. The Js stayed at Hurlburt and Kirtland for local training only.
Stickman53fe 1 year ago
@VVilliegie The Pave Low was an MH-53, not a CH. We flew two variants up until it's retirement in 2008, the MH-53J and the MH-53M.
Stickman53fe 1 year ago
Wanna see real highspeed low flying? Search for CH-53 Nazgul ;) 25ft at max. speed.
eisregen1983 2 years ago
almost didn't rate it 5/5 if it wasn't for the maneuver
platinumsalamander 2 years ago
Point of correction, this is not a CH-53. In fact this is a MH-53 Pavelow.
Pavescout 2 years ago
Comment removed
Pavescout 2 years ago
Gee, how nice of that pilot to swerve, and not deafen you by flying directly overhead.
sigmasquadleader 2 years ago
so those are not pave lows but almost the same the are ch53e super stalions and they have 7 rotor blades for lift and yes we do have all the fun
prodjectj 2 years ago
seen one of those land on my ship.. that sucker was a monster.. 6 blades and all those ponies..... we normally carrieed ch-46 seaknights.. some bad mamma jamma's too .. marines have all the fun
/. chris
cutter043 2 years ago
The Shittah.
I hear those bitches coming for at least 5 miles..
KNKX-KNJK..Right over my house here in Alpine.
motokid032 2 years ago
That's bad ass!
kentuckyhellfire 2 years ago
sorry to say you're wrong those are pavelows the HH-60 is the pavehawk
h60gunner 3 years ago
im sorry to say, but those are not pavelow's. Pavelows are hh-60's
cdyff 3 years ago
UH-60 is a good helicopter and so is the CH-53 remember Sikorsky has made both of these helicopters. The Different roles in different helicopters vary.. UH-60 has its roles and CH-53 has its roles as well.
ww2corsair 3 years ago
nice video very nice
pompierke2 3 years ago
your ass is on crooked, best helo ever made
Heist527 3 years ago
yea man they are the best ever made and in 2011 they are coming out with the CH-53k wich will have 3 engines in it with 3000 hp each, ITS GONNA BE SWEEEEEEETTTTT!!!!
BoneBone2012 3 years ago
Yah, Ive been trying to get on that project for the past year. Its going on in WPB, FL. I would hope they have a little more horses than 3k. The E models engines are rated @ 4380.
Heist527 3 years ago
I would love to work/fly one , i know a guy works on the aerodynamics of the upcoming k model at the Shlensky helicopter place in north texas.
BoneBone2012 3 years ago
Those are MH-53J Pave Low's from the USAF not CH-53's
cpasley21 4 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
i dont give a shit
gregori46 4 years ago
You give enough of one to reply back to me ,loser
cpasley21 4 years ago
How can tou tell? Sir... They look like CH53 stallions to me. No disrespect.
ethiopianlover 4 years ago
2 Engines, 6 Blades, Pave Package up Front W/2 Aux. Fuel tanks on the side! Its a pavelow! This is coming from an x mh-53 crew chief. You don't forget them!
edoyles 4 years ago
refueling probe is the fist give away
warhammer72 4 years ago
My 2 cents :-) When I was in the 1st gulf war I was on "d" models back then. We had a small detachment of RH-53's with us that was detached from a reservist base... it was essentially a CH-53d with a refueling probe and utility hoist and drop tanks. Thats what they look like to me.
Heist527 3 years ago
wicked if only i could have one of those parked in my back garden id be happy.
raymondrayban 4 years ago 2