the thing i dont like about the ps1 version is that some parts of the environment dont move correctly with other parts. And its pretty easily noticeable too.
I got a problem saving the data on n64. I think it has to do with a controller pak but I don´t know what that is and I don´t have this problem with any other n64-game... What´s that about?
who cares about graphics. n64 version is a great port but its kinda blurry and bright on some spots and there's only 6 songs and each song is not the fully completed. ps1 version has better controle's and you it has all of the songs and there are fully completed. plus you can play it on your ps2. so ps1 wins!!! but n64 is still good.
Here's we have someone who doesn't know what they are talking about.
Cartridges are perfectly capable of playing video, it just takes up a ton of room, and cartridge space is limited. Later GBA carts, which were much larger, had a few movies distributed on them, like Shrek and Shrek 2.
The Nintendo 64 had no chipset flaws. I think what you are referring to is difficulty in programming, which the Nintendo 64 did not have. The PS2, however, did.
The reason the PSX won is because they didn't have to pay the licensing cost for each cart, and the medium was cheaper. $7 for each cart versus a couple of cent for each CD. That, combined with far greater capacity, won the developers over.
Nintendo 64 was better but it was way slower wich was more better and realistic, the colors was not as bright as playstation but nintendo version is better
Nah, I think DC's controller is the best for this game, the graphics and the smooth 60 fps framerate are fantastic features, considering the age of the game...
@DeeFutura news flash you can use a dc controller (or any other controller) with pc. =). Well now a days anyway lol. I actually prefer the ps1 controller for it. DC and N64 always seemed awkward to me.
@DeeFutura You're right on this one the Dreamcast version is the better version of this game the PS1 and PC versions both have a horrible view distance and choppy videos that run at 15fps while on Dreamcast you have an improved draw distance with videos running at 30fps
n64 = better graphics. playstation: better music. on hthe playstation version you get to hear the whole song instead of the annoying looped and edited songs on n64.
The PS1 version although had weak graphics compared to it's n64 counter part, there are more music tracks available and they are technically the full songs where as the N64 had to cut them short and remove some songs
@495194932634199719 No me jodas, el control de el N64 es mas comodo, puede usarse con mas juegos y mas gracias a su Analogic Stick, en el N64 se pueden perder datos si no cuidas bien los cartuchos, pero que me dices de los CDs?, ahi si hay que tener mucho cuidado, los CDs no duran nada! rayate el CD y te jodes, ademas en esos tiempos pirateaban los cds de PS1 como ahora con las peliculas... Yo jugue este juego en el nintendo y si es mucho mejor mas solido.
@AnthoniDelgado yo juge en la N64 y cuando le pegaba al catucho cagaba el juego, y los CDs no mas se raya la musica, tambien se cuidan como los cartuchos, ahora si los CDS se te rayan son mala calidad, o no sabes cuidar, io tngo el MMX6 desde el 2000 y todavia me funka a la perfeccion. y para que te duren los juegos tienes que tenerlos originales no piratas, y habian CDS negros que esos duran eternidades, como un Cd demo que tenia que esta mas rayado que el .... y todavia funka!!!
To me is clear that Nintendo 64 version is superior. PS1 3D worlds always get really distorted as you approximate polygons. Textures get gradually untwisted as you approach them also... it is maybe some technique to compensate for its low technical capabilities. N64 3D worlds look very solid. No weird distortions. This applies to any 3D PS1 game... just look at the building's windows in the first PS1 part.
@lightkuragari That is probably due to bad programming.Perfect example is the Crash Bandicoot series.I think that does not happen on Crash Bandicoot games,due to Naughty Dog's more aggressive style of usage of the CD drive (virtual memory).
@lightkuragari I've also noticed this, think it might be because N64 had superior graphics hardware. But keep in mind that PS1 had more room for detailed textures due to using CDs instead of cartridges.
@Farklu besides the Playstation version also ran 640x480 just as the n64 port did. It isn't like a poor 32x240 down scaled (hypothetically) A Saturn port or anything. so what if the PS games didn't really have straight lines that is the only issue. the reason is PS games had sharper graphics which resulted in aliasing. Clearer textures and more vibrant color. I would much rather play with a harder screen than a softer less content game.
@Farklu yes, PS1 version is faster, however it seems that was changed on purpose, it's not for some technical reason. I mean, that was developers' choice. I suppose PS1 version is more enjoyable because of this fast paced gameplay. But this is specific to this game... But graphics distortion happen in every 3D PS1 game, and it really bothers me when i play those. Can't stand it. Even if the soundtrack is indeed better or textures are more detailed. But that's just me, anyway. Long life to VG!
@lightkuragari sorry dude, graphics arent everything, the 64 for version loses massive points for not having the awesome soundtrack. ps1 was always the clear winner.
but then i got the dreamcast version christmas :) :) :) :) :) :) :)
@MrBurgundy76 Graphics aren't everything, i agree. But PS1 graphics are not even passable. Even with better textures (better textures that twist, by the way) or the coolest soundtrack (which is true for PS1 as well), I can't stand the PS1 3D rendering. It bothers my eyes. But yeah, that's just me anyway.
@lightkuragari N64's only benefit was the stable render of polygons. Everything else is a downside, the controller- the texturing, the texture filtering on low res texturing (I'd prefer nearest neighbor on textures that low res) and the blurry display of the N64 itself. I think the Dreamcast version is best of both worlds.
@InstinctualJealousy Actually you're right. If the PSX rendered polygons correctly, It's high res and nicely filtered and defined textures would be worthwile (they're not, but that's my own taste, as well as the controller, since i prefer the N64 controller). But it is unfair to say N64 is generally superior. And yes, of course Dreamcast is the best from both worlds. Although, to be fair again, Dreamcast is like the highly anticipated next generation console of that time.
@lightkuragari playstation 1 is still the better console though.. playing tony hawks with n64 controllers suck.. and ps1 has better sound quality to me thats more important than shit thats around me im looking at the skater and doing the tricks so yeah!
@cronochos Sound quality?Nope its the same. the disks get scratched its over and I can pirate ps1 games as for the controls you only need 4 buttons to play alot of games if thats not enough we have the dpad and cbuttons.
@sebkav88 maybe you dont notice but i sure do.. if you want argue with me that a cartridge will play just as well as a COMPACT DISC then by all means go for it.. the reason alot of developers went to playstation was because of these limitations.. low space and expensive to produce.. the disc is superior to the cartridge therefore its a better console
@sebkav88 im talking about space on the cartridge.. thats why as another poster stated N64 only had a few songs and the Playstation version could hold a full audio CD
The Dreamcast Version is the superior port, with improved character models and textures. Sadly the PC version didn't get these models. It would have made the game that much more worth it.
I had this on both consoles and I found the n64 to have a lack of a soundtrack but the ps1 had lack of GPX and Cds are easy to break and carts arent able to scratch up. So I prefered the n64
@theretrogamerno1 and you wont understand.. long time ago a guy said that dreamcast beat ps1 and 63... of course sega dreamcast is no competition for them it was competition for ps2 and gamecube.... not for ps1 or 64.... that is why i typed my little chart there... what game is comptetion for what game.. but its incomplete...
@carlosmonte500 of course you scumbag, its a LOT BETTER! but dreamcast its NOt n64 or ps1 rival, during dreamcast times the rivas were PS2 and Gamecube.... so dreamcast should be compared with Gamecube or PS2 you jackass.... is like comparing starfox 64 graphics with supernintendo starfox! DICKHEAD!
@algelitovirgin16 half the games on dreamcast were ports of n64 and ps1 third party games though, and nobody developed on the chipset because it was too goofy and there was no point. so you can compare the system to n64 or ps1 easily even though it had a 128bit processor it wasnt optimized just like the saturn
@KaloKross well i didnt know it was no one developed dreamcast original games... but for the time it was released, it should be compared with ps2 64 and maybe even xbox.
@algelitovirgin16 i know that you stupid i just was telling my opinion not comparing everyone knows that dreamcast is not comparable algelitovirgin16 don't knows that
@carlosmonte500 I played the PS1 version back in the day. Then I played the N64 version and the Dreamcast version, my favourite is the N64 version, because I love that console.
Playstation 1 was extremely popular in its time, but all in all, N64 is a better console because of better features and graphics, the N64 had more slots for the controllers and built-in memory to save games, graphics on the N64 is much cleaner and the pixels are not visible
Playstation 1 was extremely popular in its time, but all in all, N64 is a better console because of better features and graphics, the N64 had more slots for the controllers and built-in memory to save games, graphics on the N64 is much cleaner and the pixels are not visible, Playstation 1 games are cheaper and easy to purchase, games for N64 are expensive but very good quality, I personally think that the N64 is better and more advanced consoles
Playstation 1 was extremely popular in its time, but all in all, N64 is a better console because of better features and graphics, the N64 had more slots for the controllers and built-in memory to save games, graphics on the N64 is much cleaner and the pixels are not visible, Playstation 1 games are cheaper and easy to purchase, games for N64 are expensive but very good quality, I personally think that the N64 is better and more advanced consoles
n64 looks like muddy textures like hell. It's sad there graphics buffer was so small. It makes all the power of the system go to waste. There was a game that worked around the small graphics bugger however that wasnt muddy. konkers bad fur day.
It's hard to decide because while both look great, they still look different. For example, the PS1 excels in texture quality, color, and sound, but the N64 is better at resolution, dynamic lights, and framerate. So yeah, both look good in different ways.
When I first played this game years ago it was on N64 I had so much fun but the only thing that the N64 has over ps1 is graphics. Graphics are smoother on N64 but now ps1 got larger soundtrack with full tracks not just samples from a few songs like n64 also ps1 has blood when you bail and rumble when you grind. So ps1 takes it now the dreamcasr version is better than those two and for the big finale Tony hawk pro skater 2x which is the xbox version owns them all lmao
@adrixmega091 Actually the N64 had better audio when you look into their sound processors.
The deciding factor was that PS1 had CD ROM, which was like, 200x bigger in capacity than the N64 cartridge, so the PS1 could have more uncompressed sound and video at the cost of needing loading times
Thing is, the N64 doesn't have a dedicated sound processor. Audio processing is mostly shared with the RCP, which of course was the graphical workhorse for the system.
in Nintendo 64's graphics are far ahead in pixels are less noticeable ... osea pixels .. but the audio of the music is a bit poor and without brilloo ... playstation .... and the pixels are very noticeable and mapping on 3D objects imajenes as buildings or walls, it distorts the shape of the Imaje .... but the audio is bright and sharply .. that's my opinion!
en nintendo 64 los graficos tienen mucha ventaja en pixeles...osea son menos notables los pixeles.. pero el audio de la musica es un poco pobre y sin brilloo ...y en el playstation ....los pixeles son muy notables y el mapeado de imajenes en los objetos 3d como los edificios o muros,se distorciona la forma de la imajen.... pero el audio tiene brillo y nitides ..esa es mi opinion!!
the ps1 version looks very crapy how the buildings load look like shit ..the n64 looks like some kind of fog but that doesnt make the game look like the crappy ps1 version
as everyone would expect in a multiplatform game for ps1 and n64, the ps1 version has much better sound quality and the n64 version has noticably better graphics
the thing i dont like about the ps1 version is that some parts of the environment dont move correctly with other parts. And its pretty easily noticeable too.
ghk1d 1 week ago
Who give a crap. I can own all three for $20 at the Goodwill. HAHAHA
MrAndydudeta 1 week ago
I got a problem saving the data on n64. I think it has to do with a controller pak but I don´t know what that is and I don´t have this problem with any other n64-game... What´s that about?
coldgreenwater 3 weeks ago
aw HELL yes i got a ps1, thps2, RE nemesis, MGS, GT2< and syphon filter for christmas!
ninjapivotman1 1 month ago
@ninjapivotman1 and an a atari with a sh*tton of games controllers and catalogs
ninjapivotman1 1 month ago
who cares about graphics. n64 version is a great port but its kinda blurry and bright on some spots and there's only 6 songs and each song is not the fully completed. ps1 version has better controle's and you it has all of the songs and there are fully completed. plus you can play it on your ps2. so ps1 wins!!! but n64 is still good.
cyclonboys64 1 month ago 6
dreamcast version is the fucking best. The xbox version i don't really count as the same game
noideac 1 month ago
the ps1 was 32bit so when they made the n64 port of this it wasn't as graphically pleasing as the n64 however the ps1 is more nostalgic
Mac0901Games 1 month ago
add the fact ps 1 had 1 yr head start and broke very often ,
ninendowii2000 1 month ago
How come whenever I see N64 Tony Hawk game videos, you see white stuff along the edges of the screen?
TimeTurners 2 months ago
playstation supported bigger longer games and video playback within games and that's why it won from the n64.
the nintendo 64 also had serious chipset flaws which made it a nightmare for developers vs the original playstation.
foxsux6000 2 months ago
@foxsux6000
Here's we have someone who doesn't know what they are talking about.
Cartridges are perfectly capable of playing video, it just takes up a ton of room, and cartridge space is limited. Later GBA carts, which were much larger, had a few movies distributed on them, like Shrek and Shrek 2.
The Nintendo 64 had no chipset flaws. I think what you are referring to is difficulty in programming, which the Nintendo 64 did not have. The PS2, however, did.
Draknfyre 1 month ago
@foxsux6000
The reason the PSX won is because they didn't have to pay the licensing cost for each cart, and the medium was cheaper. $7 for each cart versus a couple of cent for each CD. That, combined with far greater capacity, won the developers over.
Draknfyre 1 month ago
psx had horrible graphics, i don't know how we got from the beauty of 16 bit era to this 3d shit, still had good games though lol.
JumpingBalrog 2 months ago
dreamcast is the clear winner here
NintendoFanboy1235 2 months ago
in my opinion n64 version is better. i like the music a lot more. ^^
lucariokiddo 3 months ago
the only difference i see is a different character model in the N64 version...
MegaZack30 3 months ago
ps1 better
CRIP1358 3 months ago
The Sega Dreamcast version of this game is the best version.
PrrrromotionGiven 3 months ago
Naww that was thps3 for n64!
YourLocalVlogService 4 months ago
Tonky Hawk Pro Skater 2 was the last commercial game for the Nintendo 64 in North America.
Draknfyre 4 months ago
@Draknfyre Correction: THPS3 was the last commercial game in North America!
Diegorsilva2007 1 month ago
Nintendo 64 was better but it was way slower wich was more better and realistic, the colors was not as bright as playstation but nintendo version is better
Butterxxxzzz 4 months ago
PS1- Better Textures, less boxy graphics, cd music
N64- blurry textures, crisper but boxier polygons, better render distance, crap music, slower gameplay, fewer levels.
MrAlienAssassin 4 months ago
N64 = better graphics but looks slower and less fun to play. IMO anyway.
KCwellard 4 months ago
And the best version of thps2 is... Sega Dreamcast's version. Hands down.
DeeFutura 4 months ago 17
@DeeFutura Yeah!
PrrrromotionGiven 3 months ago
@DeeFutura Xbox if you want the 4-Player action, while PC if you want netplay, THPS1 levels and even more hacking ability.
AgentPofNewVestroia 2 months ago
@DeeFutura The PC version is the best version.
shadowtsunami 1 month ago
@shadowtsunami
Nah, I think DC's controller is the best for this game, the graphics and the smooth 60 fps framerate are fantastic features, considering the age of the game...
DeeFutura 1 month ago
@DeeFutura news flash you can use a dc controller (or any other controller) with pc. =). Well now a days anyway lol. I actually prefer the ps1 controller for it. DC and N64 always seemed awkward to me.
shadowtsunami 1 month ago
@shadowtsunami
Yup, and PC plays pretty much the every version of this game, but it just doesn't feel the same...
DeeFutura 1 month ago
@DeeFutura You're right on this one the Dreamcast version is the better version of this game the PS1 and PC versions both have a horrible view distance and choppy videos that run at 15fps while on Dreamcast you have an improved draw distance with videos running at 30fps
thelongtimemagic 1 month ago
@thelongtimemagic
And not only that, the game runs at amazing 60 fps and with the VGA-connector the game looks nice and sharp.
DeeFutura 1 month ago
@DeeFutura agreed!
waxdrwest 6 days ago
@DeeFutura xbox?
riseandfall420 4 days ago
dc version pwns both anyway
extalia 4 months ago
n64 = better graphics. playstation: better music. on hthe playstation version you get to hear the whole song instead of the annoying looped and edited songs on n64.
punkrocknroll91 4 months ago
PLaystation 4 ever
FCfutbolistas 4 months ago
The PS1 version although had weak graphics compared to it's n64 counter part, there are more music tracks available and they are technically the full songs where as the N64 had to cut them short and remove some songs
lethalbullet1 5 months ago
PC version>all versions
Reinscorpion 5 months ago
la n64 tiene mnos detalles como por ej (la sangre, las chispas de la patineta)
encambio la PS1 tiene esos detalles, y su musica es mas completa y se puede ver videos
la Ps1 es mas comoda en control y la n64 no
la n64 no sufre deformaciones de grafica, la PS1 si..
la n64 no se rayan las canciones, la PS1 si
la n64 es mas facil perder datos, la PS1 no
495194932634199719 5 months ago
@495194932634199719 pues la ps1 en ciertos juegos tiene mejor grafica, pero en la mayoria
afavor del 70%n64 mejor que ps1
100yochingon 5 months ago
@495194932634199719 No me jodas, el control de el N64 es mas comodo, puede usarse con mas juegos y mas gracias a su Analogic Stick, en el N64 se pueden perder datos si no cuidas bien los cartuchos, pero que me dices de los CDs?, ahi si hay que tener mucho cuidado, los CDs no duran nada! rayate el CD y te jodes, ademas en esos tiempos pirateaban los cds de PS1 como ahora con las peliculas... Yo jugue este juego en el nintendo y si es mucho mejor mas solido.
AnthoniDelgado 5 months ago
@AnthoniDelgado yo juge en la N64 y cuando le pegaba al catucho cagaba el juego, y los CDs no mas se raya la musica, tambien se cuidan como los cartuchos, ahora si los CDS se te rayan son mala calidad, o no sabes cuidar, io tngo el MMX6 desde el 2000 y todavia me funka a la perfeccion. y para que te duren los juegos tienes que tenerlos originales no piratas, y habian CDS negros que esos duran eternidades, como un Cd demo que tenia que esta mas rayado que el .... y todavia funka!!!
495194932634199719 5 months ago
N64 had better graphics, PS1 had better controls NOBODY CAN DENY THIS
thewhitebrazilian 5 months ago
@thewhitebrazilian
Indeed
megamanx1291 5 months ago
2 things
Ocarina of time
Goldeneye 007
N64!
goutons 6 months ago
@goutons wow!I didn't like n64 at all,but 007 changed everything!
ksioamaral89 5 months ago
ps1 has tekken so.......... i guess it wins
mybuthurts123456789 6 months ago
Dreamcast wins
winlover37 6 months ago 3
n64 for 3d is way better the ps1 3d just looks bad
ghk1d 6 months ago 3
To me is clear that Nintendo 64 version is superior. PS1 3D worlds always get really distorted as you approximate polygons. Textures get gradually untwisted as you approach them also... it is maybe some technique to compensate for its low technical capabilities. N64 3D worlds look very solid. No weird distortions. This applies to any 3D PS1 game... just look at the building's windows in the first PS1 part.
lightkuragari 6 months ago 21
@lightkuragari That is probably due to bad programming.Perfect example is the Crash Bandicoot series.I think that does not happen on Crash Bandicoot games,due to Naughty Dog's more aggressive style of usage of the CD drive (virtual memory).
xan1242 5 months ago
@lightkuragari I've also noticed this, think it might be because N64 had superior graphics hardware. But keep in mind that PS1 had more room for detailed textures due to using CDs instead of cartridges.
dir390 4 months ago
@dir390 Yes, that's definitely right. A good example for this is Megaman Legends. Much better textures in PS1 version.
lightkuragari 4 months ago
@lightkuragari
Who the fuck cares about graphics ? The PS1 version is faster and has better music.
Farklu 3 months ago
@Farklu besides the Playstation version also ran 640x480 just as the n64 port did. It isn't like a poor 32x240 down scaled (hypothetically) A Saturn port or anything. so what if the PS games didn't really have straight lines that is the only issue. the reason is PS games had sharper graphics which resulted in aliasing. Clearer textures and more vibrant color. I would much rather play with a harder screen than a softer less content game.
squirrleydew 2 months ago
@squirrleydew
exactly sir :)
Farklu 2 months ago
@Farklu yes, PS1 version is faster, however it seems that was changed on purpose, it's not for some technical reason. I mean, that was developers' choice. I suppose PS1 version is more enjoyable because of this fast paced gameplay. But this is specific to this game... But graphics distortion happen in every 3D PS1 game, and it really bothers me when i play those. Can't stand it. Even if the soundtrack is indeed better or textures are more detailed. But that's just me, anyway. Long life to VG!
lightkuragari 2 months ago
@lightkuragari sorry dude, graphics arent everything, the 64 for version loses massive points for not having the awesome soundtrack. ps1 was always the clear winner.
but then i got the dreamcast version christmas :) :) :) :) :) :) :)
MrBurgundy76 2 months ago
@MrBurgundy76 Graphics aren't everything, i agree. But PS1 graphics are not even passable. Even with better textures (better textures that twist, by the way) or the coolest soundtrack (which is true for PS1 as well), I can't stand the PS1 3D rendering. It bothers my eyes. But yeah, that's just me anyway.
lightkuragari 2 months ago
@lightkuragari N64's only benefit was the stable render of polygons. Everything else is a downside, the controller- the texturing, the texture filtering on low res texturing (I'd prefer nearest neighbor on textures that low res) and the blurry display of the N64 itself. I think the Dreamcast version is best of both worlds.
InstinctualJealousy 1 month ago
@InstinctualJealousy Actually you're right. If the PSX rendered polygons correctly, It's high res and nicely filtered and defined textures would be worthwile (they're not, but that's my own taste, as well as the controller, since i prefer the N64 controller). But it is unfair to say N64 is generally superior. And yes, of course Dreamcast is the best from both worlds. Although, to be fair again, Dreamcast is like the highly anticipated next generation console of that time.
lightkuragari 1 month ago
@lightkuragari playstation 1 is still the better console though.. playing tony hawks with n64 controllers suck.. and ps1 has better sound quality to me thats more important than shit thats around me im looking at the skater and doing the tricks so yeah!
cronochos 1 month ago 2
@cronochos Sound quality?Nope its the same. the disks get scratched its over and I can pirate ps1 games as for the controls you only need 4 buttons to play alot of games if thats not enough we have the dpad and cbuttons.
sebkav88 2 weeks ago
@sebkav88 maybe you dont notice but i sure do.. if you want argue with me that a cartridge will play just as well as a COMPACT DISC then by all means go for it.. the reason alot of developers went to playstation was because of these limitations.. low space and expensive to produce.. the disc is superior to the cartridge therefore its a better console
cronochos 2 weeks ago 2
@cronochos I agree with the expensive.but the limitations they had the expansion when needed.
sebkav88 2 weeks ago
@sebkav88 im talking about space on the cartridge.. thats why as another poster stated N64 only had a few songs and the Playstation version could hold a full audio CD
cronochos 2 weeks ago
@cronochos True,but I can easily just get my cd player and play a song better then this
sebkav88 2 weeks ago
@sebkav88 wow way to defend your original argument.. im done with you man
cronochos 2 weeks ago
@cronochos yup bye I win.
sebkav88 2 weeks ago
@sebkav88 lol
cronochos 2 weeks ago
@cronochos trolololol
sebkav88 2 weeks ago
whats the song at the beginning.
PS1 is btter
nikobelic25000 6 months ago
ps 1 is better
MrJabox9 6 months ago
Playstaitio
n
Justinmeatybonds 6 months ago
i'm kicking the game in the dreamcast right now
carlosmonte500 6 months ago
The Dreamcast Version is the superior port, with improved character models and textures. Sadly the PC version didn't get these models. It would have made the game that much more worth it.
Ultimaflims 6 months ago
wow who cares if n64's audio quality was not as good as the ps1's, just the fact that they managed to put the soundtrack in is quite impressive...
Supertomiman 7 months ago
Dreamcast wins.
venom13194 7 months ago
cara de todos prefiro o tony hawks proving graund do xbox 360
rsrsrsrsrs
100ViniciusPimenta 7 months ago
I had this on both consoles and I found the n64 to have a lack of a soundtrack but the ps1 had lack of GPX and Cds are easy to break and carts arent able to scratch up. So I prefered the n64
toot1231 7 months ago
can you do gc vs dc
carlosmonte500 7 months ago
PS1 Wins. Fatality
jogodoido1 7 months ago
Comment removed
emacdaddyfunk 7 months ago
there is no such thing as linear textures, clown.
dacealksne 7 months ago
who cares which of the 5th gen versions are better? the Dreamcast version stomps both of these
noideac 7 months ago
@noideac i agree
carlosmonte500 7 months ago
PS1: Better Music
N64: Better Graphics and Gameplay
TheJmanMaster 7 months ago
@TheJmanMaster Id pick music over graphics, N64 mearly had samples of songs
robdelabassist 7 months ago
n64 for smoother graphics and non linear textures
ps1 for the soundtrack and FMVs
both are great :D
BronzeTurd 7 months ago
n64
christianmiguel224 7 months ago
n64 better ps1 skipping sound tracks kinda good graphics but n64 has better graphics ,but still both or great ;)
christianmiguel224 7 months ago
is there a reason the audio is skipping on the PS?
killervacuum 8 months ago
As much as I love both consoles, the PS1 just is better to me :)
ThePhoneUpdate 8 months ago
love this game. ps1 has better play and graphics i gotta admit
liamisalegend22 8 months ago
n64 for pixel smoothing and non-linear textures
ps1 for less censorship, FMVs, and better sound
any version is good IMO, thats why i like the ps1 version of tony hawk 4 better than the ps2 version
BronzeTurd 8 months ago
win n64
alexmolinacriado 8 months ago
Play it on ps3 it works and better graphics
iplaythps 8 months ago
Ps1 has more detail and less pop up but is not as smooth around the edges
michigan1777 8 months ago
chuck norris can do that without his board
dogukan830 9 months ago
@dogukan830 well ican ramp without a ramp
justinjacobe 8 months ago
Supernintendo vs Sega Genesis
PS1 vs Nintendo 64 vs Sega Saturn
PS2 vs Gamecube vs Sega Dreamcast
PS3 vs Wii....... unfortunatly no Sega competitor..
algelitovirgin16 9 months ago 18
@algelitovirgin16 i think will be better
ps3 vs xbox360
carlosmonte500 6 months ago
@algelitovirgin16 It seems that Nintendo was always an enemy to everyone.
xan1242 5 months ago
@algelitovirgin16 you forgot microsoft
yoshie257 5 months ago
@yoshie257 no he didnt
nullhunnad 5 months ago
@algelitovirgin16 Ringedge anbd ringwide are fakes btw.
TheLingaling 4 months ago
@algelitovirgin16 Sega was replaced with xbox 360. Unfortunatly no atari or sega or odessy.
zukodude487987 4 months ago
@algelitovirgin16 I don't get what you mean i really don't!
theretrogamerno1 3 months ago
@theretrogamerno1 and you wont understand.. long time ago a guy said that dreamcast beat ps1 and 63... of course sega dreamcast is no competition for them it was competition for ps2 and gamecube.... not for ps1 or 64.... that is why i typed my little chart there... what game is comptetion for what game.. but its incomplete...
but people had helped completeing it!
algelitovirgin16 3 months ago
@algelitovirgin16 U have problems
theretrogamerno1 3 months ago
played this on ps1 fucking love this game
d3vils4t4n 9 months ago
how i hated these golf cars.. xD
ShiggyRecordZz 9 months ago
lol draw distance
wisdumcube 9 months ago
its the dreamcast version
dreamcast version beat the n64 and ps1 for 10000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000times
carlosmonte500 9 months ago
@carlosmonte500 dreamcast cant compete against any of these you dummy, sega saturn maybe the rival, dreamcast is gamecube and ps2 rival.
algelitovirgin16 9 months ago
@algelitovirgin16 fuck you you fucking asshole if played this game on the dreamcast you see that this graphics are much better.
carlosmonte500 9 months ago
@carlosmonte500 of course you scumbag, its a LOT BETTER! but dreamcast its NOt n64 or ps1 rival, during dreamcast times the rivas were PS2 and Gamecube.... so dreamcast should be compared with Gamecube or PS2 you jackass.... is like comparing starfox 64 graphics with supernintendo starfox! DICKHEAD!
algelitovirgin16 9 months ago
@algelitovirgin16 half the games on dreamcast were ports of n64 and ps1 third party games though, and nobody developed on the chipset because it was too goofy and there was no point. so you can compare the system to n64 or ps1 easily even though it had a 128bit processor it wasnt optimized just like the saturn
KaloKross 8 months ago
@KaloKross well i didnt know it was no one developed dreamcast original games... but for the time it was released, it should be compared with ps2 64 and maybe even xbox.
algelitovirgin16 8 months ago
@algelitovirgin16 i know that you stupid i just was telling my opinion not comparing everyone knows that dreamcast is not comparable algelitovirgin16 don't knows that
carlosmonte500 7 months ago
@algelitovirgin16 bitch
carlosmonte500 7 months ago
@carlosmonte500 WTF is wrong you dude?
algelitovirgin16 7 months ago
@carlosmonte500 I played the PS1 version back in the day. Then I played the N64 version and the Dreamcast version, my favourite is the N64 version, because I love that console.
DLDAcoustics 9 months ago
what I want to know is what the hell version is ported to the ipod? None of these look like it.
MonkeyMojo54 9 months ago
@MonkeyMojo54
Dreamcast.
leangreenbean333 8 months ago
seems that you played broken the Ps1 version
skeven0 9 months ago
I owned it on both consoles. Loved both versions for different reasons, didn't prefer one over the other.
TheBardsSongCGS 9 months ago
i used to hate that golf cart man ._.
iOnePab 9 months ago
graphics dont make the games
FurryNiGhTFoX 9 months ago
iPod touch wins haha
bananaphone1987 10 months ago
need side by side comparison coz i really cant tell anyway difference
xierotron 10 months ago
PC version is, and will always be the best one
Reinscorpion 10 months ago
@Reinscorpion who plays pc games? I dont think anyone like typing in order to play lol
ScorePN44 9 months ago
@ScorePN44 pc>consoles lol
Reinscorpion 9 months ago
@ScorePN44 + pc has better graphics
Reinscorpion 9 months ago
well playstation 1 had better control but the n64 had better graphics
GlobalCrisisMaker 10 months ago
Playstation 1 was extremely popular in its time, but all in all, N64 is a better console because of better features and graphics, the N64 had more slots for the controllers and built-in memory to save games, graphics on the N64 is much cleaner and the pixels are not visible
Ivan19Hr 10 months ago
Playstation 1 was extremely popular in its time, but all in all, N64 is a better console because of better features and graphics, the N64 had more slots for the controllers and built-in memory to save games, graphics on the N64 is much cleaner and the pixels are not visible, Playstation 1 games are cheaper and easy to purchase, games for N64 are expensive but very good quality, I personally think that the N64 is better and more advanced consoles
Ivan19Hr 10 months ago
Playstation 1 was extremely popular in its time, but all in all, N64 is a better console because of better features and graphics, the N64 had more slots for the controllers and built-in memory to save games, graphics on the N64 is much cleaner and the pixels are not visible, Playstation 1 games are cheaper and easy to purchase, games for N64 are expensive but very good quality, I personally think that the N64 is better and more advanced consoles
Ivan19Hr 10 months ago
lol the n64 has no videos and no blood hahaha,,, ps1 owns n64 cmon
aldrum420 10 months ago
PS1 ROCK´S
nilzen100 10 months ago
i have both versions also the gba,pc,xbox(THPS2x) but the but the best version is the dc version
vicecity80sforever 11 months ago
Comment removed
MrGeo7k 11 months ago
ps1 games looks grainy and n64 games looks too edgey lol.
dweem2009able 11 months ago
Don't hate on the often-ignored Dreamcast version.
sonicheroes777 11 months ago
@sonicheroes777 Well sadly its an often ignored console :\
I own pro skater 1 and 2 for dreamcast and love em
bullethead2202 10 months ago
@sonicheroes777 it easily the best version, so theres no point in even comparing them
noideac 10 months ago
n64 looks like muddy textures like hell. It's sad there graphics buffer was so small. It makes all the power of the system go to waste. There was a game that worked around the small graphics bugger however that wasnt muddy. konkers bad fur day.
athletichunta 11 months ago
It's hard to decide because while both look great, they still look different. For example, the PS1 excels in texture quality, color, and sound, but the N64 is better at resolution, dynamic lights, and framerate. So yeah, both look good in different ways.
Deiphiz 11 months ago
n64
pokepetshop 11 months ago
N64, I preffer
LucasTheFodao 11 months ago
n64 hands down. If n64 games were discs instead of cartridges it would rape ps2.
torontoraps8 1 year ago
I remember I used to play the PS1 version of this game at McDonalds. It was addicting.. lol
MechWarrior324 1 year ago
When I first played this game years ago it was on N64 I had so much fun but the only thing that the N64 has over ps1 is graphics. Graphics are smoother on N64 but now ps1 got larger soundtrack with full tracks not just samples from a few songs like n64 also ps1 has blood when you bail and rumble when you grind. So ps1 takes it now the dreamcasr version is better than those two and for the big finale Tony hawk pro skater 2x which is the xbox version owns them all lmao
ETV101 1 year ago
PC Forever ! :D
Gonchalo1000 1 year ago
PSONE WINS
FATALITY!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
rennan197 1 year ago
The sound and frame rate seem better on the psx version while the textures and shadows look better on the N64 version
cgentero 1 year ago
for me its like this
n64 better grafics
ps1 better audio quality
adrixmega091 1 year ago 17
@adrixmega091 Actually the N64 had better audio when you look into their sound processors.
The deciding factor was that PS1 had CD ROM, which was like, 200x bigger in capacity than the N64 cartridge, so the PS1 could have more uncompressed sound and video at the cost of needing loading times
xilefian 1 year ago
@xilefian
Thing is, the N64 doesn't have a dedicated sound processor. Audio processing is mostly shared with the RCP, which of course was the graphical workhorse for the system.
dunnono00 11 months ago
@adrixmega091 You blind ?
themaniacboy 8 months ago
whatabout dreamcast
DrNo0Entertainment1 1 year ago
Lol @ Playstatio n
Dude0Vinni0Dude 1 year ago
in Nintendo 64's graphics are far ahead in pixels are less noticeable ... osea pixels .. but the audio of the music is a bit poor and without brilloo ... playstation .... and the pixels are very noticeable and mapping on 3D objects imajenes as buildings or walls, it distorts the shape of the Imaje .... but the audio is bright and sharply .. that's my opinion!
elio2488 1 year ago
@elio2488 aprende a hablar ingles idiota hahah
Flaitesexy 1 year ago
@Flaitesexy oyee relajate,,, si quieres corrijelo tu .en fin ... puedes darle tus quejas a google traductor..OK
elio2488 1 year ago
en nintendo 64 los graficos tienen mucha ventaja en pixeles...osea son menos notables los pixeles.. pero el audio de la musica es un poco pobre y sin brilloo ...y en el playstation ....los pixeles son muy notables y el mapeado de imajenes en los objetos 3d como los edificios o muros,se distorciona la forma de la imajen.... pero el audio tiene brillo y nitides ..esa es mi opinion!!
elio2488 1 year ago
win nintendo 64
GustavoBR1000 1 year ago
this game looks the same on both consoles :|
ciprianos4 1 year ago
And the dreamcast is better than both of these cause it was a 6th generation while the ps1 and n64 were fifth gen
shadowloks2292 1 year ago
Does anybody notice that the ps1 is more fast paced than the 64
shadowloks2292 1 year ago
the ps1 version looks very crapy how the buildings load look like shit ..the n64 looks like some kind of fog but that doesnt make the game look like the crappy ps1 version
666AnDrEz666 1 year ago
hang on hang on,PS3 PS3 PS3 PS3
hiranura 1 year ago
i gota admit, im a huge playstaion fan but in this game nintendo 64 has the better graphics,so nintendo 64 for me
hiranura 1 year ago
as everyone would expect in a multiplatform game for ps1 and n64, the ps1 version has much better sound quality and the n64 version has noticably better graphics
kR0B45 1 year ago
dreamcast looks better than both
slashrocks59 1 year ago
listen, dooche bags tht lov the ps1, IT FRIKEN SUKS. DEAL WITH IT!!!
scotts2300 1 year ago