Added: 3 months ago
From: telegraphtv
Views: 7,020
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (49)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • i didn't understand a thing he said, he was talking nonsense

  • "Privacy's for paedos" HAHA

    

  • What a cunt.

  • He's a total bullshitter, what on Earth is he going on about with Coogan and grant? they don't 'bang on about their privacy', they have been caught by nosy journalists, all they choose to do is act, write, etc...can't stand this repulsive creep with double standards who has this loathing for people who happen to be famous and who have had successful careers when they, despite their scandalous private lives, still have a much greater grasp of morals than Paul...

  • he's clearly lost the plot in his head, he can't accept what a twat he is so he'll never admit to being in the wrong, he's the worst type of human being.

  • He's got to live with himself. Imagine how hard that is.

  • I like him! haha

  • hope that scar on his face is from someone pouring acid over him.

    Papers are a relic of a bygone age. News is now old by time it makes press and papers now just go about quoting twitter accounts we all can access.

  • What an idiot.

    

  • Well...gotta respect his candor...

  • i did a story about..err...two girls in a bubble bath with robert deniro

  • it really is beyond parody

  • A morally dubious character to say the least. The fact he is still boastful about his 'exciting car chase life' under such close scrutiny also makes him an idiot.

  • dont worry paul theres always suicide to fall back on!

  • What a *revolting* person!

  • well at least he's honest, he knows what he says would be unpopular but still goes ahead with it LOL

  • This guy has the cold dead eyes of a shark.

  • This man is completely nuts! Has anyone got the full video of his evidence to the enquiry because I missed the show?

  • I have the right to privacy no matter who I am unless there is real eveidence that what I am doing may be illegal or can be proven to be in the public interest. I am the owner of my own privacy and if I choose to talk about it in public that is my choice. It does not automatically give anyone else the right to talk about without my consent.

  • This guy is a real bottom feeder. He is the most odious hypocrital, ignorant and stupid man I have ever come across. He actually doesn't realise that most tabloid editors and jouranalist watching this will be "shut up' you are making the case for press regulation a lot stronger than it already was.

  • Scum

  • Comment removed

  • I watched it live and thought that Leveson tried to stop him tell the whole story. he stopped him and told him not to incriminate himself. The qusetions where did he know of anyone around him, who did, may have said they did, or he know they did. So it is all hearsay. Looks like it going to be a cover up. Paul was going to tell all. I thought that is what we where looking for.

  • I wonder if this guy would be happy if we installed a webcam to his bathroom and bedroom for 24-hour streaming on the internet. Just, y'know, so we know he's not a paedo.

  • What a sad and appalling human being

  • Someone once told me that he is definitely a pedophile. I just cant remember what that persons name or even what he or she looked like.

  • Paul McMullan didn't wipe his bum properly the other day and was seen scratching at his crack every few minutes, sources say. A quick check of his laundry basket (while he had a wank over X Factor in the other room) revealed a crusty skidmark of 1 and 3/4 inch length. He also uses prostitutes, eats Pot Noodles and sometimes doesn't brush his teeth. Not a fan of shopping, Paul intends to strategically re-gift his least liked presents from last year to close friends this Christmas. /satire

  • Privacy's for paedophiles? This guy is fucking mental.

  • "So there's two of us, in our underpants, running through a nunnery..."

    Does he think he's on a f*cking panel show?

  • what. a. shit. And an idiot - He is clearly incapable of structuring a proper moral argument about privacy and fame.

    This is the very reason we need to properly regulate the press. Sadly it is wholly incapable of self-regulation as it has repeatedly shown.

  • Thanks for posting this vid. Guess the number of dislikes are aimed at McMullan not your vid. I feel the need to have a shower after watching that guy. And to think, he's the nice honest one...

  • if privacy is so evil, McMullan you little cunt, publish the address of your residence

  • The guy so embodies the kind of stereotypical sewer rat tabloid journalist that its almost like he's putting it on. Seems like someone with a chip on his shoulder, perhaps cos his life has never amounted to more than being a third rate journalist. Now the jumped up shit shoveler senses an opportunity to make a name for himself as this sort of grotesque voice of the media. He says sensational things because thats the world he lives in - suddenly he can see himself in the headlines.

  • completely pointless individual

  • jumped up little cunt

  • Paul McMullan is a cunt of a man. Fuck this guy

  • My jaw is on my lap... ffs... is it even human?

  • If McMullan had offered the bland, carefully spun testimony which is the norm, the response would've been muted. He doesn't deserve to be let off the hook, and perhaps his forthrightness was just tactical or self-indulgent, but he shouldn't be the target of stronger criticism on the basis of being more upfront than can be expected of his colleagues. Let's be just as outraged at those who the evidence shows believed and behaved the same, but pretend otherwise.

  • He talks about hypocrisy, it would be funny if it weren't so sick. Everyone else is a criminal but he thinks the things he's done are OK then?

  • Privacy is for pedos? Opening a can of worms there buddy.

    You see - if privacy is for pedos then why do politicians need it? I always thought it was kind of strange entrusting public funds with people who are so private about their lives considering the technology we have.

    I say if he truly believes that privacy is for pedos, then he should demonstrate this fact by publishing the mobile phone numbers of his family members, unless of course he suspects that they are pedos and need their privacy

  • What a massive twat

  • So he doesn't think people should have privacy? How about we post every minute of his day online for the world to see. Cameras in his bog, bedroom, car, following him wherever he goes. Let's have constant access to his bank account and shopping receipts to see what he spends money on. Let's monitor him at work and allow people to give constant feedback on his performance. I was going to say let's monitor him having sex and viewers could rate him...but clearly the man is dickless.

  • @koalabravo Well said sir. How could it be in the public interest to know the intricacies of some actor or writer's private life? Aside from the obvious moral implications to the individual concerned - I think it causes a much more serious toll to society as a whole. Without the relentless coverage of footballers and celeb wages, who they sleep with and what they spend their money on then maybe there would be such prevalent issues with fidelity, unemployment and looting in the case of the riots.

  • A shit in martyrs clothing.

  • Well...at least he's honest? o_O

  • He's a comedy character, right?

  • Man this guy is such a dick!

Loading...
Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more